Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

School Choice

As Public School Enrollment Drops, Alternative Options Gain Traction

Private schools, charter schools, and homeschooling add students despite dwindling numbers of kids.

J.D. Tuccille | 9.3.2025 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
A mother puts her arm around her son's shoulder as he works on a laptop at the kitchen table. | Creatista | Dreamstime.com
(Creatista | Dreamstime.com)

A new school year is here, and while millions of students still trudge off to public school classrooms and days divided by subjects, there are fewer kids making that trek than in the past, and their experiences aren't nearly so similar as once was the case. The ranks of public school students are thinning, partly because of the declining birth rate, but also because a growing share of the population prefers alternatives like private schools and homeschooling. They're increasingly assisted with funding from education choice programs.

It's a familiar journey to me, since my wife and I mostly homeschooled our son, with detours through charter and private schools. We're less alone in our choices than ever before.

You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Fewer Kids and a Lot Fewer Public School Students

"K-12 enrollment is on the decline between a combination of dropping birth rates and more school choice options, putting schools in a tight bind," Lexi Lonas Cochran reported for The Hill at the end of August. "The public school system is expected to see a drop of millions of students over the next five years, a hit that will affect schools financially and potentially lead to the closure of more districts."

Cochran noted that the U.S. fertility rate, declining like that in many other countries around the world, hit historic lows in recent years. Fewer births mean fewer children to educate in years to come. But, adds Cochran, "since COVID-19, the interest in homeschooling and private school options has exploded, especially as states pass legislation making it easier for children to go to other schools, and taking some money from public school systems to do it."

According to the National Center for Education Statistics, total public elementary and secondary school enrollment fell from a peak of 50.8 million in 2019 to 49.6 million in 2022. It's believed to be under 49 million now and expected to fall below 47 million in 2030.

The effects are felt all over the country. In Florida, Miami-Dade County Public School enrollment is down by more than 12,000 students from last year. In Texas, the large Houston-area Cypress–Fairbanks school district is down by 6,400 students in the same period; a report presented to the school board noted that "students are increasingly transferring out of Cy-Fair ISD to pursue other education options, such as charters, private schools and homeschooling." In Nevada, the Clark County School District dropped from more than 330,000 students in 2019 to fewer than 286,000 now; the Las Vegas Review-Journal editorial board acknowledges fertility decline but adds that charter schools "have seen their enrollment skyrocket" and that families also increasingly favor homeschooling and private schools.

As Public Schools Disappoint, Other Options Gain Favor

Overall, Genevieve Smith and Angela R. Watson write in Harvard's EducationNext, as of 2023, "nearly 6 percent of all school-aged children nationwide were reported as homeschooled during the 2022–23 school year. This compares to 10 percent of students in private schools and 84 percent in public schools." That partially obscures the degree of change, since about 7 percent of public school students now attend privately managed, publicly funded charter schools, up from 4 percent in 2010. The share of homeschoolers doubled just since 2020, increasing from around 3 percent of students.

The "why" of these shifts in where and how students are educated has many causes, including disappointment with public school quality, proliferating options, and the ease with which educational materials can be accessed over the Internet. But, as Tara Moon observes in coverage of declining public school enrollment for FutureEd, "the pandemic played a major role in accelerating the decline…. Some families withdrew their children entirely and educated them at home, while others opted for private schools, many of which resumed in-person learning sooner than public schools."

Many families were horrified by learning losses they saw in their children when schools bungled remote learning during pandemic lockdowns. They were often equally disturbed by what they saw over their kids' shoulders in terms of lesson content. Recent polling finds that "nearly two-thirds (64%) of school parents say K-12 education is headed in the wrong direction, up eight points from last year." Thirty-six percent of parents say they would send their children to private school if they could, 14 percent would choose homeschooling, 10 percent prefer charter schools, and 40 percent would stick with traditional public schools. Existing private school parents report the highest satisfaction with their choice, followed by homeschoolers and charter school parents, with traditional public school parents at the rear.

The more families unhappy with traditional schooling who turned to private schools or decided to teach their own kids, either alone or in arrangements like learning pods and microschools, the more awareness of and comfort with education options increased. That has driven demand for reforms that ease access to education choices other than traditional public schools.

Surging Participation in School Choice

Writing for EdChoice, Brandon Ruder reported last week that "in just one year, the total number of students participating in private school choice programs across the nation skyrocketed, increasing by 25%." Nationally, over 1.3 million children now use such programs—Education Savings Accounts (ESAs), in particular. The details vary from state to state, but ESAs make education funding portable, allocating money that follows students to the schooling of their choice rather than assigning it to a building or district. That eases matters for families that would otherwise pay for tuition or education materials on top of the burden of taxes that support public schools.

Similarly, the Johns Hopkins School of Education Homeschool Hub revealed last year that "twenty-one states have reported homeschool participation for 2023-2024. Of those, only two show a decline." Of the two states reporting a decline, New Hampshire stopped counting homeschooled students who receive ESA funding as homeschoolers, "so, this decline may not truly reflect a decrease in actual homeschool participation, but may be just a change in how students are counted in this state."

For the 2023–2024 school year, the Homeschool Hub found the highest shares of homeschooled students in Alaska (16.15 percent), Tennessee (10.75 percent), and Montana (9.03 percent). The lowest shares were in Connecticut (3.01 percent), Washington, D.C. (3.04 percent), and Massachusetts (3.39 percent).

And remember that the ranks of students in charter schools, private schools, and homeschooling are increasing not only as the number of students in traditional public schools declines but as the total number of school-age children falls. In the years to come, there will be fewer kids overall, and their education experiences will vary far more widely than those of recent generations.

From experience, I assure parents and students alike that this changing environment will work out just fine. School days will come and go, as always. But they'll be better, since the schools will be chosen by families, not just assigned by default.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Brickbat: Up in Smoke

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

School ChoicePublic schoolsHomeschoolingCharter SchoolsEducationTeachers
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (38)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Chumby   2 days ago

    End all tax money going to the education industrial complex.

    Your kids, you educate provide daycare for them.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 days ago

      Can they learn to polish monocles?

      Log in to Reply
  2. Kemuel   2 days ago

    For most students public school is daycare after 10th grade. Just give them a diploma and tell them to get a job. Those not on the advanced placement track are not learning anything.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Wizzle Bizzle   1 day ago

      Sorry, but without a magic libertarian wand that dissolves the welfare state, you're just adding millions of citizens to the dole. The idea that the kids who aren't getting anything out of school are going to go find and keep a job is nonsensical. And all we need is millions more bored, undereducated teens running around our towns and cities 365 days a year. Make America DC Again!

      Don't know about where you live, but around here pretty much every district has vocational training at the high school level. Our kids leave the main campus 2 days a week to take anything from aerospace to nursing. They can leave high school with a realtors license or the like in their chosen path. And my district doesn't have crazy levels of funding. We certainly pay less in property taxes than the tuition at a private school.

      Log in to Reply
  3. Mickey Rat   2 days ago

    England sends five armed police to arrest comedy writer over mean tweets.

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/09/englands-arrest-of-graham-linehan-was-an-act-of-calculated-tyranny/

    " In England, yesterday afternoon, the police deliberately arrested a man who was flying in from the United States because he had expressed views on Twitter that the British government does not like. England — not North Korea, or Russia, or China. England — the land of John Stuart Mill and Thomas Paine and Monty Python. For tweets on transgender issues. Tweets — not threats of imminent violence, or a credible vow to blow up the airport upon arrival. Tweets — on issues about which people profoundly disagree."

    "The nature of his arrest renders the contrast as clear as it could possibly be. Yesterday, Linehan was in the United States — living his life, sharing his opinions, enjoying his independence. Today, he is in England — under observation, subject to surveillance, at liberty only if he vows not to speak where people might hear. This is not, I’m afraid to say, one of those questions of taste: In this matter, America has got it right, and England has got it wrong. What was done to Graham Linehan was an act of calculated tyranny of the sort to which the British have become far too accustomed in recent decades."

    "In the year 2025, Britain has a parliament that can meet to help you kill yourself, but not to protect your speech; an exchequer that can pluck the population’s feathers from 9,000 different angles, but that has no interest in generating wealth; and a network of police forces that are incapable of solving the most sordid crimes imaginable, but that are sufficiently well-staffed to guarantee that if an outspoken Irish comedian steps off a plane from Arizona, he will be met by enough lawmen to fill a small office. During the worst days of Covid-19, the British government instructed the population to sacrifice every last human desire it had to ensure the survival and comfort of their state-provided nurses."

    Log in to Reply
    1. Quo Usque Tandem   2 days ago

      Read that on The Free Press this morning; the outcome of activists co-opting and weaponizing authorities to do their bidding.

      How to destroy a culture in four discreet steps:

      Take an issue [Trans Rights (Lie), Palestine, doesn't really matter so long as it gets some traction]

      Open Overton's Window

      Normalize it

      Use it to cancel, and progress to enforcement

      Log in to Reply
      1. Chumby   2 days ago

        Set VPN to the UK, post away, watch Scotland Yard work tirelessly to track you down.

        Log in to Reply
      2. Mickey Rat   1 day ago

        Also, Linehan was likely in the United States when he made those tweets. Might be something to consider if you are thinking of visiting Ol' Blighty in the near future.

        Log in to Reply
        1. Wizzle Bizzle   1 day ago

          My clan left that monarchical shithole generations ago, for good reason. The idea that I would return to anything other than rub excrement on Buckingham Palace is absurd.

          Log in to Reply
    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 days ago

      The UK is lost.

      IMO the best path forward is to "encourage" people in the US who like this nanny-authoritarian bullshit to move there, and leave the rest of us alone. We could even rescue the remaining Brits who prefer freedom on the return flights.

      Log in to Reply
  4. diver64   2 days ago

    Don't worry, old Randi is on the case funneling over $40 million in union dues to left wing groups pushing trans stuff, social justice coordinators in schools, queer advisors etc.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 days ago

    Hey, Reason, good job choosing the stock/AI photo for this article, with a couple of "modern" people of indeterminate race. But you will have to do better on gender, since they look distinctly female and male.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Wizzle Bizzle   1 day ago

      You know, I was going to mock you for picking nits when somebody at Reason actually wrote a libertarian article. But you forced me to scroll back up and actually look at the photo.

      You were right. Sigh.

      Log in to Reply
  6. JasonT20   2 days ago

    From experience, I assure parents and students alike that this changing environment will work out just fine. School days will come and go, as always. But they'll be better, since the schools will be chosen by families, not just assigned by default.

    I'm not a parent. If I was, I would not want Tucille's assurance that this "will work out just fine." I would want data showing that the children in private schools and being homeschooled are actually better off there than in public school. No anecdotes, no assumptions that the invisible hand of the market will make schools better, but objective, reliable data. I mean, for one thing, how is a parent supposed to choose a better school if they don't have any objective evidence about which schools are better?

    Log in to Reply
    1. Stupid Government Tricks   2 days ago

      So you assume government knows best, in spite of no objective reliable data, but you won't assume parents know best, because that would be anecdotal.

      Good thinking, bud. That's the kind of anecdotal data which shows you went to public schools.

      Log in to Reply
      1. JasonT20   1 day ago

        Are test scores not reliable objective data? If not, then why do public school critics so often point to test scores as proof of "failing" public schools? Why is there a > $1 billion/year K-12 testing industry?

        The voucher programs that many red states are pouring billions of dollars into so that parents can send kids to private schools where they don't take the same tests they give to public school students. Tests that kids in public schools usually have to pass to be promoted to 4th grade, graduate high school, and so on.

        Good thinking, bud. That's the kind of anecdotal data which shows you went to public schools.

        Sure did. Went to two public universities as well. I'm sure I could have done even better at private schools, assuming that I went to private schools that cost 50% or more what the public schools spend per pupil. That is mostly what you find whenever you search for the 'best private schools' in a given metro area, by the way - private schools with tuition approaching $20k in Florida where per pupil spending is under $10k a year, or private schools well over $40k a year in states with high per pupil spending between $20k and $30k a year. Unless, of course, you're talking about religious schools like Catholic schools that usually don't rely entirely on tuition to operate.

        I mean, it would have been awesome if the Florida voucher system had existed decades ago when I was in elementary and middle school here. My parents could have gotten a voucher covering almost half the cost of the tuition at an elite private school. They could have gotten that even if I had never been in a public school and even if they could easily afford the tuition without it.

        But hey, spending millions of dollars a year to send kids to private schools they were already attending, where the parents weren't even breaking a sweat to pay the tuition without vouchers, is a small price to pay to allow poor kids to escape failing public schools right?

        I mean, obviously, if those kids have parents that care about their education, they'll find a way to transport them several miles away or more to where the good private schools are. (I mean, seriously, who is going to try to set up a top private school in a broken down neighborhood?) Assuming, of course, that they can find one of those good private schools that will accept them.
        School choice works both ways, you know. Sure, the parents can choose a school, but the school can also choose whether to enroll their kid.

        Log in to Reply
        1. Stupid Government Tricks   1 day ago

          You tout testing for government schools only? Why would testing in private or charter or home schools be reliable and objective?

          You can't have it both ways. I don't think your public education done you much good.

          Log in to Reply
          1. JasonT20   1 day ago

            You tout testing for government schools only?

            Uh, no? How do you get that from what I wrote? I said that private schools receiving vouchers for students (at least in Florida, with one of the largest, if not the largest number of students using them) are not required to give voucher students the same tests that public school students take.

            To expand on this a little, the last time I checked into it, they do give the kids a test, but they choose which one from among several, and they don't have to publish any of that data publicly. They just send it to a research unit at Florida State University that compiles a report they send to the legislature. Few people even know that report exists, I'm sure.

            Why would testing in private or charter or home schools be reliable and objective?

            Republicans in Florida going back to Jeb Bush in the late 90s have insisted that all of this testing was the only way to be sure that public schools were doing their jobs. For them to not require that private schools (getting taxpayer money) give those same tests to those students in the voucher program is a ludicrous level of hypocrisy.

            But, if you don't trust that test data for private schools or homeschooled students, then I'm sure you'd support doing away with all of these testing requirements that eat up so much time and money in the public schools. (Charter schools do have to give state tests to students, those scores are published just like they are for regular public schools, and the charter schools get a A-F grade, just like the regular public schools. I have criticisms of some charter schools that are different from my criticisms of vouchers.)

            Log in to Reply
          2. JasonT20   1 day ago

            You can't have it both ways. I don't think your public education done you much good.

            Since I wasn't trying to have it both ways, I think that my public education has done me more good than whatever you got.

            Log in to Reply
    2. JFree   1 day ago

      This is why charter classrooms would be far more effective than charter schools. A charter school is far away from your home - with nothing other than the district or that schools marketing propaganda to provide info once a year or so. A charter classroom is inside your kids nearby school. If there is a curriculum/teacher that is succeeding (or failing), then everyone will know - and fast. Which also means that if its working, then it can be expanded quickly with simply an additional classroom or class time - with a very low marginal cost (ie paid by parents) because public schools are a club good (not a public good or a private good or a common resource).

      Course that requires that the focus be on wresting control of districts away from the professional union/pedagogue class and towards parents/teachers/neighbors. Which is not at all what school choice libertarians (or the Mises types here) want which is merely inserting cronyist decisions inside an already corrupted district/state mgmt.

      Log in to Reply
    3. I, Woodchipper   1 day ago

      I'm not a parent.

      opinion dismissed

      Log in to Reply
      1. Wizzle Bizzle   1 day ago

        There is definitely something to that. Granted, we could play that game all day: men get no say in the abortion debate; people who don't serve get no say in military matters; and so on. But yes, people without kids have very little idea about the realities of having kids, and they certainly don't have the same vested interest in the schooling system.

        I think that is one of the main drivers of shitty public schools. Go to the city, and the vast majority of residents (and teachers) are childless. What the fuck do they care if your kid can read and write? They want to make them good little soldiers of the omnicause. Come down to the suburbs where 9/10 households are parents or grandparents, and suddenly how your school performs matters a great deal.

        Log in to Reply
        1. JasonT20   1 day ago

          Granted, we could play that game all day...

          Really, I regret even replying to his post. That was a completely disingenuous argument from someone that has no interest in thinking. He just wanted to throw what he imaged to be a clever retort out there. There's no point in feeding trolls.

          Log in to Reply
      2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 day ago

        Also nobody was shocked when he said that.

        Log in to Reply
      3. JFree   1 day ago

        Parents are only relevant to the choices made re curriculum/teaching/etc inside a classroom. The tax base re schools is generally (or should only be) property tax. Better if it were a land tax rather than a property tax but nevertheless that tax base is driven by land/property prices - and the benefits of that capital spending accrue to HOMEOWNERS.

        Everything about this charter school or school choice debate is deliberately deceptive. And libertarians in particular are completely corrupt when it comes to understanding the land-based elements of anything - including a tax system.

        Log in to Reply
        1. JasonT20   1 day ago

          Everything about this charter school or school choice debate is deliberately deceptive.

          On this, I agree completely, but probably for very different reasons. Since I completely disagree about basing education funding on anything to do with ownership of property or land. To the extent that geography matters at all, it should be to account for differences in the costs between different locations.

          My principle here is that public funding of education should not depend at all on the financial resources of parents. Equal opportunity for all children is not even theoretically possible if wealthy parents in wealthy neighborhoods can pay the same X% of their income toward schools as working class and poor families and yet get a far higher quality education from it. And this is still how it works in most of the country. The big (liberal) cities that spend large amounts above their state averages in low income urban school districts aren't getting better results for a lot of complicated reasons, I think. But that doesn't negate the clear advantages schools (and their students) in wealthy suburban districts have over those in more middle income urban areas and suburbs and small towns.

          If parents with greater means and/or a greater willingness to make financial sacrifices for their children want to go above and beyond what is funded by all taxpayers, that is their right. But if they opt out of the accountability of the publicly funded system, they should be opting all the way out of the funding itself, in my opinion. That is my problem with vouchers as advocated for by libertarians and conservatives and implemented by Republicans. They want to move the money from public schools to private schools and to parents homeschooling their children. But they want to do that without having any of the accountability measures they force on public schools apply. Along with none of the requirements public schools have to enroll and serve all students eligible to attend them, regardless of ability, special education status, language spoken at home, religious affiliation, or even whether their parents are LGBTQ+.

          It gets really hard not to see this as an attempt to bring back something in education the United States decided was wrong a long time ago...

          Log in to Reply
          1. JFree   1 day ago

            basing education funding on anything to do with ownership of property or land. To the extent that geography matters at all, it should be to account for differences in the costs between different locations.

            Well that is imo backwards. The capital spending on schools and other infrastructure is what provides value to the land. That infrastructure is a big reason why land in Manhattan costs more than land in Nebraska or why land in Omaha costs more than land in North Platte. It is the reason population goes to one area rather than another. Taxing that incremental value is a fee for enforcing the government-created monopoly over land title. Otherwise - what one is expecting is a free lunch.

            For that same reason, local spending OF that geographically based tax money should be accountable at the primary level to land owners and only at the secondary level (the level above where that spending returns more than it costs to land value) to residents. Most local spending IS geographically based - from roads to schools to police to fire. At least at the capital spending level - and the marginal/operations costs (eg the costs of setting aside a classroom for a particular teacher to teach a particular curriculum) are often very small. The latter are where imo parents should control the decisions (and should provide the marginal funding if necessary).

            For a similar reason, if an already-built school (say in a community that is declining in population) chooses to spend its taxes on a swimming pool or adult/career education or K-12 education or a conversion into a rec center or fire station or something else that maximizes the ROI of that facility, then that can ONLY happen in a community that recognizes the geographic basis of that tax base. Pretend that that can only be spent the way parents want, and you have simply created a free money fountain for parents.

            Log in to Reply
            1. JasonT20   22 hours ago

              Well that is imo backwards. The capital spending on schools and other infrastructure is what provides value to the land. That infrastructure is a big reason why land in Manhattan costs more than land in Nebraska or why land in Omaha costs more than land in North Platte. It is the reason population goes to one area rather than another. Taxing that incremental value is a fee for enforcing the government-created monopoly over land title. Otherwise - what one is expecting is a free lunch.

              You're missing something here. You're talking about a recipe that perpetuates the pooling of wealth in a small area. If good schools really are such a draw for people to live in an area (especially one as great as employment and business options, among other factors), it will be the people with wealth that will outbid people without wealth to live there. They will use those better schools to give their children that additional advantage of a higher quality education as adults. Those educated children will be far more likely than their peers from low income families to achieve economic success and accumulate the wealth to ensure that their children have that same advantage.

              That isn't theory or ideology, either. It is a statistical fact that is clear in all of the data that can be had to understand the relationship between family wealth, parental educational achievement, and a child's educational and later economic outcomes. It is also inevitable. The only remaining question is how much advantage society going to accept going to those at the top. So, baking anything into the system that increases the likelihood of economic inequality is a bad idea for multiple reasons.

              People don't stay blind to that inequality indefinitely. In a nation that allows all citizens to vote, the majority that are not wealthy won't keep voting against their own interests, and the interests of their children, forever. It is also economically inefficient. When the lower part of the population is denied economic opportunity, then children with inherent talent, drive, and imagination are left under-educated and won't fulfill their promise. All while their mediocre peers born into wealthy families take slots in colleges and jobs that they wouldn't have been able to earn without so many of their potential competitors left out of the pool. (Legacy admissions, the phone is for you.) Lastly, it just isn't moral or ethical to give unearned advantages like that to a small part of the population that happens to have been born into wealth. People don't stay blind to that either, and it adds to any dissatisfaction the voters already feel.

              Log in to Reply
            2. JasonT20   22 hours ago

              The last thing I want to add is this:

              Wealth and political power are always deeply intertwined, and power always protects itself. The people living in the wealthy areas, with the best schools, the best roads, and the cleanest streets, will use the political power that their money gives them to protect their way of life. One way they do so is by distorting markets, and that makes them even more inefficient. NIMBYism is all about people in nice, clean suburbs with great schools pulling the ladder up behind them to be sure that the "wrong" people can't move in and take advantage of what they have.

              The other way they protect their privilege, naturally, is to make sure that they control all aspects of government. They don't want to risk being outvoted, so they will try and find ways to make the politicians they supported with their money won't be voted out by candidates that will actually represent the majority that aren't wealthy.

              Log in to Reply
          2. Get To Da Chippah   17 hours ago

            That is my problem with vouchers as advocated for by libertarians and conservatives and implemented by Republicans. They want to move the money from public schools to private schools and to parents homeschooling their children. But they want to do that without having any of the accountability measures they force on public schools apply.

            Seems as though the GOP's sinister machinations would be easily thwarted if parents were happy with their local public school systems and just continued sending their kids there rather than clamor for other options.

            Log in to Reply
            1. JasonT20   6 hours ago

              Seems as though the GOP's sinister machinations would be easily thwarted if [all] parents were happy with their local public school systems and just continued sending their kids there rather than clamor for other options.

              FTFU

              Their "sinister machinations" only require that some parents won't be happy with their local public schools. They also only require that parents perceive that they are being given better options, not that they will have proof that they are being given better options. Nor do their plans depend on giving parents viable options. The illusion of choice can be subconsciously satisfying, even if you only have one practical option to choose. Besides, I've repeatedly pointed out how, most of the students using vouchers were already in private schools. The numbers of students actually leaving public schools is very small. (A couple of %)

              Their plans also become easier when they are the ones running the state government that makes all the large-scale education decisions. "Hey, our public schools aren't good enough! We need to give parents the option to send their kids to private schools instead! Ignore that we've been in charge of state government at all levels for over 25 years, where we've set the funding levels, state standards, testing requirements (including deciding every few years to make major changes to the tests), what textbooks can be used, etc.! Or that we did away with teacher tenure 15 years ago, and have been implementing "merit pay" plans that depend on formulas no one understands, and doing nothing about the thousands of positions that remain vacant at the start of the school year consistently for the last several years because of all of this."

              In Florida, they've never acted like they wanted public schools to succeed.

              Log in to Reply
              1. Get To Da Chippah   4 hours ago

                Their "sinister machinations" only require that some parents won't be happy with their local public schools.

                Which was clearly already the case and had been for awhile, as you yourself point out below.

                They also only require that parents perceive that they are being given better options, not that they will have proof that they are being given better options.

                Is this a 'parents are too dumb to understand what's really going on" argument? What is acceptable proof may well differ from one set of parents to another, or even from one parent to another within the same family. It may be enough that their kid seems to be doing better at basic math and doesn't have Mommy Has A Pecker for required reading in third grade.

                Nor do their plans depend on giving parents viable options. The illusion of choice can be subconsciously satisfying, even if you only have one practical option to choose.

                'Viable' and 'practical' also seem like terms open to individual interpretation.

                Besides, I've repeatedly pointed out how, most of the students using vouchers were already in private schools. The numbers of students actually leaving public schools is very small. (A couple of %)

                Let's say I agree with your statement that most of the people using vouchers were not in the public school system. Wouldn't that be indicative of their dissatisfaction with public schools? By and large these people are wealthy enough to be paying for public schools while also having enough money to ensure their kid or kids don't have to go to them.

                Further, as the article stated above:

                According to the National Center for Education Statistics, total public elementary and secondary school enrollment fell from a peak of 50.8 million in 2019 to 49.6 million in 2022. It's believed to be under 49 million now and expected to fall below 47 million in 2030.

                50.8 million to under 49 million student enrolled would represent a drop of roughly 4% nationwide. That may seem small, but it does mean 2 million fewer students, and financially that is not a "small" loss for the districts, as we can tell by their reactions.

                Log in to Reply
      4. JasonT20   1 day ago

        opinion dismissed

        Do I get to not pay taxes that fund either public schools or private school vouchers, then? Let me know when you'll vote for candidates that will only require parents to pay taxes that support education, then your comment will mean jack shit.

        Log in to Reply
        1. I, Woodchipper   1 day ago

          You're preaching to the choir here about having to pay taxes for things you don't support and have no control over. Did you just find this place?

          Log in to Reply
      5. EISTAU Gree-Vance   23 hours ago

        Dude says posting here stresses him out. No way he could raise kids.

        He’s weak, like most progs.

        Log in to Reply
  7. Apollo 1   2 days ago

    The Amish only went to school for 8 years. Sending your children to government schools with other students, who only want to disrupt, is a waste of time and money. Attaching the funds to the student, and not the school is better for parents, but not for teacher unions/politicians.

    Log in to Reply
  8. Truthteller1   1 day ago

    Hoisted by their own petard.

    Log in to Reply
  9. MWAocdoc   1 day ago

    "K-12 enrollment is on the decline ... putting schools in a tight bind"

    This is false. There is no "bind" on school districts that they haven't imposed on themselves. Aside from the fact that there should be no tax-funded school districts in the first place, there is no reason why existing school districts cannot "downsize" just like any other enterprise can. In fact, their status as not-for-profit enterprises makes it much easier for them to downsize - lay off teachers and maintenance employees, close extra buildings, cut taxes, consolidate with neighboring districts and so on. The only thing that might prevent that is their own cussedness, teachers unions, parent convenience and government regulation.

    Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Proposed Ban on Gun Possession by Transgender People Would Be Neither Legal Nor Constitutional

Jacob Sullum | 9.4.2025 8:50 PM

Uncle Sam Is Investing Now. What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

Veronique de Rugy | 9.4.2025 4:55 PM

Florida Gets Closer To Being a 'Free State' With Plan To End School Vaccine Mandate

Christian Britschgi | 9.4.2025 4:05 PM

The New Texas Ban on Cell-Cultured Protein Is an Unconstitutional Interstate Trade Barrier, a Lawsuit Says

Jacob Sullum | 9.4.2025 2:40 PM

Graham Linehan's Speech Must Be Defended

Robby Soave | 9.4.2025 1:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300