Neither Cranks Nor Hacks Should Head HHS
RFK Jr. has had a crazy week. It will not be his last, alas.
On Wednesday, during a signing ceremony for some Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) initiatives in Texas, a visiting Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., said, "I know what a healthy child is supposed to look like. I'm looking at kids as I walk through the airports today, as I walk down the street, and I see these kids that are just overburdened with mitochondrial challenges, with inflammation. You can tell from their faces, from their body movements, and from their lack of social connection. And I know that that's not how our children are supposed to look."
The corresponding C-SPAN clip went viral, triggering a fresh round of Wait, THIS guy is in charge of the federal government's public health apparatus? "He literally makes zero sense," opined radiologist, pandemic-policy critic, and National Review contributor Pradheep Shanker. "Wacky, flat-earth, voodoo stuff," added Biden-administration Covid-19 response coordinator Ashish Jha. The Bulwark's culture editor went with "dumbass fucking witch doctor charlatan."
Such exasperated vitriol is common among RFK Jr.'s critics, and has so far produced about the same real-world political results as 10 years' worth of sputtering in the general direction of President Donald Trump. Kennedy remains the second Trump administration's most popular Cabinet member, and the president definitively has his secretary's back in the face of high-level Centers for Disease Control (CDC) firings, COVID vaccine restrictions, mass-shooting hypotheticals, medical-school MAHA retrofits, plus 750 HHS employees jointly accusing their boss of "repeatedly spreading inaccurate health information."
Kennedy was the member of the Cabinet whom Trump first called on during his three-plus-hour meeting Tuesday, encouraging the decades-long vaccine skeptic and autism theorist to hurry up with his federal investigation into the causes of increased autism diagnoses. "The autism is such a tremendous horror show," the president said. "When you see the kind of numbers that you have today versus 20 years ago…there has to be something artificially causing this, meaning a drug or something."
Rebuttals to critiques of RFK Jr.'s voluminous, multidisciplinary record of illiberal crankery tend to come in three varieties: 1) political scoreboard-watching ("It was President Trump who was overwhelmingly reelected on November 5," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday, in defense of Trump firing CDC Director Susan Monarez one month into her job. "This woman has never received a vote in her life, and the president has the authority to fire those who are not aligned with his mission"); 2) benefit-of-the-doubt-giving on discrete pieces of MAHA ("There's certain things [he] oversees that seem to be supported in a bipartisan way — like getting terrible toxic stuff out of our kids' food," cousin-in-law Chris Pratt recently told Bill Maher. "I think that's a great thing"); and 3) furious denunciation of the culture/regime Kennedy seeks to supplant.
"Anyone who had any power or leadership role at the CDC during Covid deserves to be fired," conservative media personality Buck Sexton tweeted this week. "The failure was that universal and cowardice that widespread."
It's that last category of complaint whose potency seems undimmed a decade into Trumpism. Trump (like his counterpart on the populist left, Bernie Sanders), arose at a time of profound citizen revulsion at bipartisan elite failure: failing to prevent and then overreacting to the attacks of 9/11, the subsequent nation-building fiascos in Iraq and Afghanistan, the botched response to Hurricane Katrina, the financial crisis and bailouts, plus all the issues (especially immigration) that the two main political parties seemed to prefer campaigning on rather than solving. The great derangements of Covid, the summer of 2020, and the Jan. 6, 2021, ransacking of the Capitol seemed to vindicate that bitter alienation from the ruling class, albeit in ideologically polarized ways.
Each main political team in the United States likes to tell itself a soothing fairytale. For Democrats, it's that they are the party of "science" and adult-like dedication to norms of impartiality. For Republicans, it's that they are the party of "truth" and the courage to tell it. When cross-examined at any length about dubious fidelity to these values, each side will beat a hasty retreat to what the other guys made them do. Or worse yet, they won't even know about their own side's glaring flaws.
RFK Jr. is to truth what a fish is to basketball. But Buck Sexton is absolutely right about the CDC serially botching its job during the pandemic. Has there been anything like a reckoning among the Democratic and managerial left since then? Or are they content to point at RFK and snicker?
If contrarian kookery and nihilism are bad policy responses on the right, so, too, is autopilot managerial liberalism on the left. Kennedy's predecessor, Xavier Becerra, appointed and confirmed in the teeth of the pandemic, was an absolute political hack with no relevant health-policy experience, touted at the time for being a Latino. He was, predictably, terrible on vaccine mandates and government censoriousness. And probably received 1/1000th the negative press that RFK Jr. has.
American governance will continue to spiral downward until voters start demanding something more than Well, the other guy is worse. Neither Kennedy nor his predecessor were fit for this job; may we one day have a politics where that easy truth isn't so rare to acknowledge.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
This guy shouldn't be in charge of the federal government's public health apparatus because nobody should be in charge of the federal government's public health apparatus. Public health is not in the federal government's mandate.
The only public health activities that are even arguably in the federal government's mandate are pandemics requiring a coordinated response across state lines. And the last time we had one of those, the fed's response was so abysmal that it's obvious to any sane observer that we'd have been better off with no one in the role than the clown-car response we got.
Amen! I wish Reason would remember it's supposed to be a libertarian magazine and at least pay some lip service to reducing government rather than just trying to "improve" it by wishing for the non-existent angels that would be necessary.
They give up on libertarianism a long time ago.
The only public health activities that are even arguably in the federal government's mandate are pandemics requiring a coordinated response across state lines.
Even at that there's a reasonable case to be had that they are only to buttress one state or the other, not supersede both states with their own agenda. Even in some sort of situation where half the population drops dead from a fingersnap, the FedGov doesn't appoint a replacement governor, SoS, etc., etc., etc. it figures out how the state is supposed to have elections and helps conduct them accordingly.
Agree on who shouldn't be in charge. But the only federal response to a pandemic should be to control the international border. States can handle their own responses and can't for the life of me think why the can't coordinate between each other without the feds.
Because there are 50 States (not including DC, Puerto Rico etc).
So what do you think will work ?
1/ a coordinated action plan led by the Feds
2/ Each State talking with every other State
Dumbass
There is one Democratic Party and each blue big city manages to fuck up public safety royally for the average law-abiding citizens.
You'll need to explain why they need to coordinate, first.
Bravo. Heaven forbid the federal government do those things constitutionally mandated - and ONLY those things,
I agree except the federal government has taken upon themselves at the demands of activists to pay for health care. That being the case, they do have a say in it. RFK Jr has a point. There is no argument that you can step into any classroom, mall or other setting and see kids that are sickly, overweight or zoned out on various drugs and know something isn't right.
Abolish?
But then we won't know what's in it. Plus doo processesses and something something independent agencies are untouchable.
Anyone selling that Gov - 'Guns' are going to make you healthy is selling snake oil.
Wrong Tool for the job.
Anyone criticizing RFK Jr for trying to get HHS under control should first be forced to do 50 pullups and 100 pushups. If you can't then shut the fuck up. Our country is suffering from a health crisis forced on us by Big Pharma that has bought and paid for Congress to run a line that a pill will solve everything. RFK Jr is saying Nope. Eat right, get some fucking exercise and Big Pharma can kiss our ass with their cozy congressional arrangement.
How would "Big Pharma" buy Congress if Congress Healthcare (hut hum: HHS) didn't exist?
That is the biggest nonsense here.
The left complains about "crony ?what?" (it is socialism) while being the very lobbyists for it.
It's nothing but Self-Projection and attempts at Blame-Shifting exactly what they've done on someone else.
Pass the non GMO lentils.
This is getting boring.
Waiting -- well, no, I'm not -- for sarcasmic to come along and shout WHATABOUTISM YOU MUST BE A TRUMP LOVER.
Not exactly a whatabout when you're arguing that there is suck on both sides, rather than defending one. It happens that RFKjr sucks worse because he's such an extreme nutjob.
Is he? We’ve had a man who thinks he’s a woman in a similar position.
Liar. There has been no trans woman as HHS Secretary.
Oh that’s right, it was the Office of Nuclear Energy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Levine
Rachel Leland Levine (/ləˈviːn/ lə-VEEN; born October 28, 1957)[1] is an American pediatrician who served as the United States assistant secretary for health, the admiral in charge of the United States Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, from 2021 until 2025.[2]
Rachel Levine was both an officer and a gentleman.
Don’t skirt the issue.
He might have aspired to become a rear admiral.
What you takin about, bra?
They just want to tuck away Levine, or stuff him in a wardrobe.
“In a similar position”
Do you also have a third Harvard PhD in remedial reading comprehension?
Tell that to sarc. He even brought up past comparisons to claim Trump was worse than past Presidents, then accused me of whataboutism for daring to bring up actual specific instances where past Presidents behaved worse.
You don't need to be an expert to hold this job (that's why you have experts).
What you need is to be a decent manager, with political acumen.
What you definitely shouldn't be is a conspiracy nut job.
Becerra was touted as being a Latino, KJP was a black lesbian, Buttplug was gay. They were all touted as some special class but none were touted as being competent and qualified for the job. We just saw another gay orgy aficionado who was more worried about the effects monkey pox would have on bathhouse hookups than public health.
People advocating for a “red wedding” against conservative journalists such as Robby Soave, who also happens to be homosexual, probably shouldn’t be working for a “libertarian” publication.
Abolish HHS.
I can't see a Matt Welch article without thinking of that. Consequently, I read this sentence in that light: RFK Jr. has had a crazy week. It will not be his last, alas. Is Matt Welch dreaming of a "red wedding" with RFK Jr in attendance?
You beat me to it.
I still can't believe he is out and proud as a conservative. I mean, maybe he's bi... says conservative shit, but votes Democrat when he visits the public restroom.
I'm gonna MISS Dicky Jim the Hostbutter
The main reason MAGAs want to attack public health is they did not like to be told how not to spread covid.
Especially when said commands were known to be bullshit at the time -- hand sanitizer, masking, six feet distancing, quarantining the healthy and not the sick. All wrong, all lies, all useless, unless your goal is to crash the economy and wield power.
What are the chances Tony face diapered with current thing messaging on them?
Hopefully he’s still getting booster shots.
Tony gets a lot of booster shots in his rear.
Shoe washing stations, wiping down groceries, N95 masks hung on doorknobs and worn for weeks, plastic feng shui magical shields in grocery lines and cafeteria tables, wait staff wearing masks, patrons not, the vaccinated are being endangered by the unvaccinated, it's equally deadly to your 6 month old as it is your 90 yr old grandma with COPD, pouring black dye in lakes to make them unappealing to tourists, arresting paddleboarders while screeching "what lockdowns?"
Never fucking forget. Never. Ever. Ever.
I'll never forget and so won't my wife. We refused to get the experimental gene therapy because what the "experts" were saying made no sense. We refused to wear mask and walked around the grocery store as we pleased instead of following those stupid footprints. When people said something I told them to go fuck themselves. I was driving a semi at the time and when I went into a customer that told me I had to wear a mask I said no and if they didn't like it I'd take the shipment right back where it came. They all knew it was bullshit and just asked me to sit in the truck which was fine by me. I will never forget the fascism the Dems and Karens tried to enforce on me. Screw all of them
Nor forget Communivirus Gestapo chase scenes with Remy on a surfboard!
No shit. The fascist policies reached the absurd level when they chased that guy on the surfboard down when he was all by himself and filled in skateboard parks with sand. I think that was the point a whole lot of people started saying "hold on a sec".
Or maybe they realize your own Individual Liberty (to lock yourself in a bubble so you chose) is more important than Communist Tyrants having 'Guns' shoot you for not obeying their holier-than-thou 'centrally planned' dictates.
Now do HIV.
check out the lockdown aficionado
Yes MAGAs wanted freedom (and I do too)...and now they support the guy who is on the verge of preventing people from getting the jab if they want it.
preventing? go ahead, you seem to take bad advice often, go ahead and get another jab.
Along with COVID for the 43rd time.
Preventing? I have not seen him say anything of the sort. If you want to get your 9th ineffectual booster go ahead. Myself, I'd like to see the emergency authorization ended and the shots be adequately tested for safety and efficacy. You know, science.
You had to be someone calling unvaccinated murderers. Because you keep proving the useful idiot you are with every post.
Correct. But libertarians seem to think that there is more freedom when you can kill someone with impunity.
Travel restrictions in a 1793 pandemic were far more draconian. We cared about life more back then.
People were dumber back then
They were particularly draconian for some people owned by folks living in Democratic Party strongholds who weren’t allowed to travel until 1865 when a Republican president lifted said restrictions.
It is not OTHER PEOPLES job to ensure YOUR safety.
That's IS YOUR JOB!
And within that train of selfish-entitlement right there is the very reason our government has gone rogue.
If you think others are harming you on purpose take it through the justice system on a sue for damages case.
To a point, your correct but I know zero about how an airplane engine works for example. Someone who does should make sure its built, tested and maintained correctly as it's hard to sue for damages after you hit the ground at 700mph.
Do you really think that if everyone died in an airplane crash that it would go completely UN-investigated because everyone is dead and no-one is left to "sue for damages"?
You're selling a wild 'excuse' to meet the agenda that "only 'Guns' against the people will save them!" - otherwise those 'Guns' would be used to ensure Justice after 'damages' not preemptively turn everyone/thing into criminals until x,y,z tyrannical-mandate is met.
Everything in life is a risk/benefit equation. You chose your level of safety costs with every decision out there. The difference between the two is some think using 'Guns' to demand the cost of safety will magically make those costs ?free?.
“We cared more about life back then”
In 1793? What are you? Hank Phillips?
Nothing shows you ?care? more than sticking more 'Guns' (Gov-Guns) in their faces.
I believe all the death from the Revolutionary War would say their are more important things to human-life than being a safe-robot programmed by the State.
Iffen it's not in the Wholly Bauble, the 14 Commandments or the Ku-Klux Kreed with its sublime Principles of Pure Americanism, it ain't MAGA! Ask Michael Heise.
Your dementia specialized assisted living center needs to put you back in restraints and up your Thorazine dosage.
It took a lot of courage for Robby to come out as a conservative and for Liz to admit she voted for Trump. I'm guessing the Reason cocktail party conversation can get a little frosty these days. Maybe Welch and Bailey just hang out at the bar until someone shouts Tariffs! to break the ice. Always a croud pleaser.
And don’t you know they really want to break the ICE.
Kennedy is not a conservative. He just isn't a wild eyed fanatical leftist. He is one of the dying breed of rational democrats.
This piece by Welch shows remarkable insensitivity to the scores of children overburdened with mitochondrial challenges, and to all mitochondrially challenged individuals generally.
Chuck Norris has never been mitochondrially challenged. The mitochondria know better.
You monster! What about the people that identify as mitochondrially challenged ?
May their bones be processed into mitochondroitin.
kids are effin OBESE, depressed, drugged, asocial. HALF THE SHITE THEY EAT ISN'T FOOD. SO YES...WE HAVE A PROBHLEM
The USA is not a [WE] problem...
It is founded on Individual Liberty and Justice for all.
Don't you have a red wedding to be guest of honor at? Sorry, you were wishing a gruesome murder on everyone you disagree with and now you think you have any authority to tell anyone anything? Fuck you, if anything, your bias should preclude you from being a journalist or in public anywhere but I'll settle for ignoring your ravings.
RFK Jr. is one dumb motherfucker. His brain is all scrambled and half the shit he says makes no sense.
Or maybe you can’t comprehend it.
Then half makes sense. That's more than Biden or Harris.
Another LGBTQ community member calling for jihad against Christians:
https://x.com/ShadowofEzra/status/1961446298143408543
What's I2MAP+? Chopped liver?
Is that community shooting up schools and dropping tranifestos threatening or calling for that to occur?
"Neither cranks nor hacks should head HHS". Well, those are the only choices we are offered. I'll take hacks over cranks. Bring back Becerra, fire Kennedy.
Since Becerra was all in on forcing untested experimental shots on people and complete lockdowns and quarantines I'll take Kennedy who is advocating we make our own decisions.
If you have been to an airport or any crowded place, you know he isn’t wrong.
We had damn near five years of COVID horseshit that was literally voodoo and figuratively flat-earth shit. We've got supreme court justices ruling on cases that directly affect women's issues, who can't define what a woman is.
Look, I used to think that people who thought vaccines cause autism were crazy-pants cranks, but if I have to have one of them running HHS, but they're skeptical of the COVID/GENDER AFFIRMING CARE voodoo flat earth shit, then I'll take anyone who says:
"Anyone who had any power or leadership role at the CDC during Covid deserves to be fired," conservative media personality Buck Sexton tweeted this week. "The failure was that universal and cowardice that widespread."
I have no idea who Buck Sexton is-- and if you'd have just given me the name and not his pedigree, I'd have assumed "gay porn actor". But Buck Sexton is 100% right. Swamp: Drain it.
You are thinking of his cousin, Buck Naked.
ENB did an article about him. Vaguely recall his favorite fluffer being named Mike Laursen or something like that.
No, that would be Buck Wild. Buck Naked is his nephew. Sexton has a point. The entire health establishment that was pushing voodoo and treatments that had no scientific basis much less wearing masks and standing 6 feet from people or putting up plexiglass dividers in schools should be drummed out of the government forever.
Little known fact, Buck Sexton is in reality famed porno star Sex Buckston.
Thing is Welch, you guys think cranks and hacks are the people you disagree with. You think Fauci and company are the people to head these agencies.
*I* think Kennedy is less likely to do as much harm as the establishment voices - even including his crankery.
Kennedy isn't likely to 'diagnose' gun violence as an 'epidemic' so that it is now brought under the remit of the CDC. Kennedy isn't likely to promulgate bullshit nutritional advice as if it was settled science. Kennedy isn't likely to deliberately lie to you 'for the greater good'.
The choice right now is not between cranks and hacks, and 'the right people'. Its just between cranks and hacks.
And I choose the crank.
I'd rather my cranky hack reduce government meddling than increase it.
THAT OPTION IS NOT AVAILABLE
Qualified selfless people aren't an option. Not having HHS is not an option. You get a choice between hacks and cranks. That's it.
What about Hanks and Cracks?
I would support Hank for HHS Secretary.
"Qualified selfless people aren't an option. Not having HHS is not an option."
Ironically; Those two rather go hand-in-hand.
Qualified selfless people do charity (volunteer).
They don't become part of a tyrannical mob packing 'Guns' (HHS).
Me too. I see too many using the wrong criteria. They want to judge by the whole person, including their knowledge, instead of looking coldly and thinking, what actual good or harm is this person likely to do? The HHS secretary's diagnostic ability from looking at faces is irrelevant to this question.
The HHS is another useless, expensive and onerous bureaucracy the US can do without regardless of who is in charge of it.
Um, this is Reason and libertarian takes are not welcome.
+1000000. It was once upon a time a long time ago ... before Trump. I miss those days.
"He literally makes zero sense," opined radiologist, pandemic-policy critic, and National Review contributor Pradheep Shanker. "Wacky, flat-earth, voodoo stuff," added Biden-administration Covid-19 response coordinator Ashish Jha. The Bulwark's culture editor went with "dumbass fucking witch doctor charlatan."
Do men have periods? Can they get pregnant? What is chestfeeding? What in all that is holy is this demented cosplay? Do women get prostate cancer? What is the statistical likelihood of a family having multiple transgender children?
Glass houses, guys.
...
These tendentious critics would have you believe RFK to be some Lysenko who'll lead the country down a bad path. It's not like that. OK, so RFK puts on airs, pretending to diagnostic acumen he doesn't have. Whoopee. He's a politician. All he's saying is that the mental and physical well-being of the young can stand a good deal of improvement. He's never going to be in position to diagnose your children as they come off airplanes and order treatments for them.
In a situation like this, ideology is much more important than knowledge. Cabinet secretary is a policy job. They have experts reporting to them, but the important outcome is not fact-based but values-based. See "The Myth of Scientific Public Policy" by Robert Formaini. RFK may be a crank, but he's a crank with the right stuff.
Right. Science can answer only scientific questions. Science cannot answer moral or ethical questions, nor tell us what we should value or what type of society we should strive for. At best, science can only advise us on the likely outcome of our choices.
And the only reason Lysenko was deleterious was that he was advising a government that was already in control of agriculture. Since RFK isn't seeking government control of medicine, his fanciful diagnoses of children's inflammatory and mitochondrial problems at a glance are harmless.
Bulwark ani oughtta know about dumbass fucking witch doctor charlatans, fer shoor.
Only one Nigerian exorcist wearing a feather necklace and speaking in tongues was on deck for the launch of the Great Barrington Declaration , and she was a nurse midwife, not a witch doctor.
True but you don't have to be Jonas Saulk to look at the childhood obesity epidemic and know something isn't right.
Reason used to be a libertarian publication. Nowhere in this article does it even pay lip service to the libertarian position that HHS shouldn't even exist because it's not mentioned in the Constitution as a function of the federal government. Doesn't matter who heads it if the agency isn't even Constitutional.
^this. Come on Reason. Who cares about HHS or who runs it? We should be talking about eliminating it entirely.
How libertarian could it even be if it used the US, or any country's or state's, constitution as a gnomon? If HHS were in the Constitution, that still wouldn't make it right, it'd just make the Constitution wrong.
Is there a reason you're spamming the comment section and making multiple nonsensical comments on the same article? You win Mute.
GOOD observation. The income tax and prohibition amendments, plus the fake 21st sort-of-repeal while worsening amendment woud all look good in a dustbin.
There used to be folks who complained bitterly that the federal government lacked a Prohibition Commissioner....
Sometimes when you remodel a house, you don’t merely repaint the walls, you have to tear it down to the studs. That is HHS. It has become a political institution, not a scientific one. After the COVID debacle where HHS doubled down on every stupid and ineffective policy despite clear data to the contrary, it needs to be gutted. After we saw first hand the revolving door between CDC and NIH and big pharma that forced ineffective and untested vaccines on millions of people that lead to thousands of deaths and millions of injuries, it needs to be razed to the foundations. I hope RFK Jr. does it.
"When you see the kind of numbers that you have today versus 20 years ago…there has to be something artificially causing this, meaning a drug or something."
Not merely true but self-evident.
Maybe or it could be that the diagnosis has either changed or become better. Instead of just pumping kids full of drugs to "treat" it wouldn't it be a good idea to explore what is going on first? The problem is that there is no money to be made in that, the money is the drugs.
The poor state of health of our children IS obvious. Yes, you can tell just by observing them. Maybe young people can't see it, but those of us who are old enough to remember what thriving children looked like see it. The obesity, the listlessness, the lack of muscle tone, the lack of social skills, the inhalers, the allergies, 9-year-olds hitting puberty, etc.—you're blind if you can't see it.
"Anyone who had any power or leadership role at the CDC during Covid deserves to be fired," conservative media personality Buck Sexton tweeted this week. "The failure was that universal and cowardice that widespread."
Absolutely. Firing is the LEAST that should be done. There really ought to be prosecutions, maybe even hangings.
So, some types of vaccines presently should be considered unsafe for certain sorts of people of category/categories. Or not.
But you would rather discuss mitochondrial DNA today and confuse the press.
At least try to keep on topic. The press can be guilty of having a short attention span and being prone to cover sensational notions such as mitochondrial DNA. Remember only a few years ago that mitochondrial DNA was found in dirt alone, and scientists were thrilled because they could use this dirt to reconstruct 0.5% of a woman's genome who lived thousands of years ago. Now I see Kennedy has a rather selective take on mitochondria by spotting it in people. Clearly the press have not covered this aura feature in fine enough detail to get it to make sense.
https://www.science.org/content/article/dna-dirt-can-offer-new-view-ancient-life# You really needed to click on that link ; )
But if a capful of dirt represents 0.5% of the whole person, then mitochondria must have something quite vivid to say with an human being present to examine on the very scene.
This was the dirt that I found when examining what the press had to say about RFK, Jr.
It is hard to imagine the press doing more damage to RFKJ than quoting him verbatim. Then again, the Jesus Caucus (formerly the LNC) need look no farther for platform-whacking voter-alienating bonkers wankers.
You give 'em hell, Matt! We're with ya...
The corresponding C-SPAN clip went viral, triggering a fresh round of Wait, THIS guy is in charge of the federal government's public health apparatus? "He literally makes zero sense," opined radiologist, pandemic-policy critic, and National Review contributor Pradheep Shanker. "Wacky, flat-earth, voodoo stuff," added Biden-administration Covid-19 response coordinator Ashish Jha. The Bulwark's culture editor went with "dumbass fucking witch doctor charlatan."
this is how you know he's not completely wrong. There's something to what he's saying
Matt, Of course RFK is far from perfect. However, the first step to improve health is to admit the USA has health problems. When RFK “sees kids at the airport” he sees a lot of huge obese kids. If you look at pictures of the USA in the 80’s you will see thin in-shape people that had very little chronic diseases. I didn’t hear Biden or Obama admit to the chronic health problems. Clearly the actions taken by the libs were not effective. RFK admits to the obesity, high-blood pressure, diabetes, and dementia problems and that is much better than I’ve seen from the far left.
Thinking obesity is a problem is white supremacy.
I'd settle for someone who knew and could enunciate Receptor Science.
What receptor science says about addictive drugs. Receptor Science (100+ years old) says drugs fill receptors. What empties those receptors (injury, PTSD) causes a desire for pain relieving drugs. People take pain relievers to relieve pain. The "recreation" in Recreational Drugs is pain relief.
"Receptor Science" by M. Simon - pass it on
https://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2025/08/receptor-science.html
"Anyone who had any power or leadership role at the CDC during Covid deserves to be fired," conservative media personality Buck Sexton tweeted this week.
Is this in doubt in the halls of Reason?
I hope not but considering the articles I've read lately I'm not so sure
One of the ironies of The Duopoly is that it's vice grip on political power, courtesy of Citizens United, guarantees that any insane spin from either of the two parties is guaranteed some success on the national applause meter.
Take a look at the interesting Op-Ed by 9 former CDC directors in today's NY Times.
RFK Jr is the best part of the second Trump administration. The HHS and other health related agencies have been sorely in need of a drastic culture change.
Our agencies have long been a vipers den of corruption and graft. Is everything that RFK Jr does perfect, no however mostly necessary and probably do go far enough, fast enough, and deep enough for what these agencies deserve.
Do we want to save our country from these un-elected bureaucrats who have ruled in-spite of election results? The federal government should be drastically slashed to 1/3 to 1/4 its current size. Many of the functions should be returned to the various states.
The alternative is to diminish the power of the various states and put all the power into the already massive federal government. One set of rules that applies to the entire country even if the rule is counterproductive is some regions. Increase the likelihood that a tin-pot dictator can wrestle control of the entire country and end our empire in a similar fashion that every other empire has gone towards its demise.
My choice is clearly to preserve and return to the intent of the founding of the country, not how it was implemented which had many flaws, but limited government for all citizens instead of just some.
"American governance will continue to spiral downward until voters start demanding something more ..."
No, voters demanding something more is what got us into this mess in the first place! Nothing can stop governance spiraling down into oblivion at this point, and I say, "Hear, hear!" And good riddance to American governance! The only thing that can restore good governance is when voters start demanding NOTHING from government except for constitutional enforcement of a very few, very simple, very obvious laws, and maintenance of an awesome national military defense ... and NOTHING MORE!