Neither Cranks Nor Hacks Should Head HHS
RFK Jr. has had a crazy week. It will not be his last, alas.

On Wednesday, during a signing ceremony for some Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) initiatives in Texas, a visiting Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., said, "I know what a healthy child is supposed to look like. I'm looking at kids as I walk through the airports today, as I walk down the street, and I see these kids that are just overburdened with mitochondrial challenges, with inflammation. You can tell from their faces, from their body movements, and from their lack of social connection. And I know that that's not how our children are supposed to look."
The corresponding C-SPAN clip went viral, triggering a fresh round of Wait, THIS guy is in charge of the federal government's public health apparatus? "He literally makes zero sense," opined radiologist, pandemic-policy critic, and National Review contributor Pradheep Shanker. "Wacky, flat-earth, voodoo stuff," added Biden-administration Covid-19 response coordinator Ashish Jha. The Bulwark's culture editor went with "dumbass fucking witch doctor charlatan."
Such exasperated vitriol is common among RFK Jr.'s critics, and has so far produced about the same real-world political results as 10 years' worth of sputtering in the general direction of President Donald Trump. Kennedy remains the second Trump administration's most popular Cabinet member, and the president definitively has his secretary's back in the face of high-level Centers for Disease Control (CDC) firings, COVID vaccine restrictions, mass-shooting hypotheticals, medical-school MAHA retrofits, plus 750 HHS employees jointly accusing their boss of "repeatedly spreading inaccurate health information."
Kennedy was the member of the Cabinet whom Trump first called on during his three-plus-hour meeting Tuesday, encouraging the decades-long vaccine skeptic and autism theorist to hurry up with his federal investigation into the causes of increased autism diagnoses. "The autism is such a tremendous horror show," the president said. "When you see the kind of numbers that you have today versus 20 years ago…there has to be something artificially causing this, meaning a drug or something."
Rebuttals to critiques of RFK Jr.'s voluminous, multidisciplinary record of illiberal crankery tend to come in three varieties: 1) political scoreboard-watching ("It was President Trump who was overwhelmingly reelected on November 5," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday, in defense of Trump firing CDC Director Susan Monarez one month into her job. "This woman has never received a vote in her life, and the president has the authority to fire those who are not aligned with his mission"); 2) benefit-of-the-doubt-giving on discrete pieces of MAHA ("There's certain things [he] oversees that seem to be supported in a bipartisan way — like getting terrible toxic stuff out of our kids' food," cousin-in-law Chris Pratt recently told Bill Maher. "I think that's a great thing"); and 3) furious denunciation of the culture/regime Kennedy seeks to supplant.
"Anyone who had any power or leadership role at the CDC during Covid deserves to be fired," conservative media personality Buck Sexton tweeted this week. "The failure was that universal and cowardice that widespread."
It's that last category of complaint whose potency seems undimmed a decade into Trumpism. Trump (like his counterpart on the populist left, Bernie Sanders), arose at a time of profound citizen revulsion at bipartisan elite failure: failing to prevent and then overreacting to the attacks of 9/11, the subsequent nation-building fiascos in Iraq and Afghanistan, the botched response to Hurricane Katrina, the financial crisis and bailouts, plus all the issues (especially immigration) that the two main political parties seemed to prefer campaigning on rather than solving. The great derangements of Covid, the summer of 2020, and the Jan. 6, 2021, ransacking of the Capitol seemed to vindicate that bitter alienation from the ruling class, albeit in ideologically polarized ways.
Each main political team in the United States likes to tell itself a soothing fairytale. For Democrats, it's that they are the party of "science" and adult-like dedication to norms of impartiality. For Republicans, it's that they are the party of "truth" and the courage to tell it. When cross-examined at any length about dubious fidelity to these values, each side will beat a hasty retreat to what the other guys made them do. Or worse yet, they won't even know about their own side's glaring flaws.
RFK Jr. is to truth what a fish is to basketball. But Buck Sexton is absolutely right about the CDC serially botching its job during the pandemic. Has there been anything like a reckoning among the Democratic and managerial left since then? Or are they content to point at RFK and snicker?
If contrarian kookery and nihilism are bad policy responses on the right, so, too, is autopilot managerial liberalism on the left. Kennedy's predecessor, Xavier Becerra, appointed and confirmed in the teeth of the pandemic, was an absolute political hack with no relevant health-policy experience, touted at the time for being a Latino. He was, predictably, terrible on vaccine mandates and government censoriousness. And probably received 1/1000th the negative press that RFK Jr. has.
American governance will continue to spiral downward until voters start demanding something more than Well, the other guy is worse. Neither Kennedy nor his predecessor were fit for this job; may we one day have a politics where that easy truth isn't so rare to acknowledge.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This guy shouldn't be in charge of the federal government's public health apparatus because nobody should be in charge of the federal government's public health apparatus. Public health is not in the federal government's mandate.
The only public health activities that are even arguably in the federal government's mandate are pandemics requiring a coordinated response across state lines. And the last time we had one of those, the fed's response was so abysmal that it's obvious to any sane observer that we'd have been better off with no one in the role than the clown-car response we got.
Amen! I wish Reason would remember it's supposed to be a libertarian magazine and at least pay some lip service to reducing government rather than just trying to "improve" it by wishing for the non-existent angels that would be necessary.
The only public health activities that are even arguably in the federal government's mandate are pandemics requiring a coordinated response across state lines.
Even at that there's a reasonable case to be had that they are only to buttress one state or the other, not supersede both states with their own agenda. Even in some sort of situation where half the population drops dead from a fingersnap, the FedGov doesn't appoint a replacement governor, SoS, etc., etc., etc. it figures out how the state is supposed to have elections and helps conduct them accordingly.
Agree on who shouldn't be in charge. But the only federal response to a pandemic should be to control the international border. States can handle their own responses and can't for the life of me think why the can't coordinate between each other without the feds.
Abolish?
But then we won't know what's in it. Plus doo processesses and something something independent agencies are untouchable.
Anyone selling that Gov - 'Guns' are going to make you healthy is selling snake oil.
Wrong Tool for the job.
Waiting -- well, no, I'm not -- for sarcasmic to come along and shout WHATABOUTISM YOU MUST BE A TRUMP LOVER.
Not exactly a whatabout when you're arguing that there is suck on both sides, rather than defending one. It happens that RFKjr sucks worse because he's such an extreme nutjob.
Is he? We’ve had a man who thinks he’s a woman in a similar position.
Liar. There has been no trans woman as HHS Secretary.
Oh that’s right, it was the Office of Nuclear Energy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Levine
Rachel Leland Levine (/ləˈviːn/ lə-VEEN; born October 28, 1957)[1] is an American pediatrician who served as the United States assistant secretary for health, the admiral in charge of the United States Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, from 2021 until 2025.[2]
Rachel Levine was both an officer and a gentleman.
Don’t skirt the issue.
He might have aspired to become a rear admiral.
Tell that to sarc. He even brought up past comparisons to claim Trump was worse than past Presidents, then accused me of whataboutism for daring to bring up actual specific instances where past Presidents behaved worse.
People advocating for a “red wedding” against conservative journalists such as Robby Soave, who also happens to be homosexual, probably shouldn’t be working for a “libertarian” publication.
Abolish HHS.
I can't see a Matt Welch article without thinking of that. Consequently, I read this sentence in that light: RFK Jr. has had a crazy week. It will not be his last, alas. Is Matt Welch dreaming of a "red wedding" with RFK Jr in attendance?
I still can't believe he is out and proud as a conservative. I mean, maybe he's bi... says conservative shit, but votes Democrat when he visits the public restroom.
The main reason MAGAs want to attack public health is they did not like to be told how not to spread covid.
Especially when said commands were known to be bullshit at the time -- hand sanitizer, masking, six feet distancing, quarantining the healthy and not the sick. All wrong, all lies, all useless, unless your goal is to crash the economy and wield power.
What are the chances Tony face diapered with current thing messaging on them?
Hopefully he’s still getting booster shots.
Shoe washing stations, wiping down groceries, N95 masks hung on doorknobs and worn for weeks, plastic feng shui magical shields in grocery lines and cafeteria tables, wait staff wearing masks, patrons not, the vaccinated are being endangered by the unvaccinated, it's equally deadly to your 6 month old as it is your 90 yr old grandma with COPD, pouring black dye in lakes to make them unappealing to tourists, arresting paddleboarders while screeching "what lockdowns?"
Never fucking forget. Never. Ever. Ever.
Or maybe they realize your own Individual Liberty (to lock yourself in a bubble so you chose) is more important than Communist Tyrants having 'Guns' shoot you for not obeying their holier-than-thou 'centrally planned' dictates.
Now do HIV.
check out the lockdown aficionado
Yes MAGAs wanted freedom (and I do too)...and now they support the guy who is on the verge of preventing people from getting the jab if they want it.
preventing? go ahead, you seem to take bad advice often, go ahead and get another jab.
You had to be someone calling unvaccinated murderers. Because you keep proving the useful idiot you are with every post.
Correct. But libertarians seem to think that there is more freedom when you can kill someone with impunity.
Travel restrictions in a 1793 pandemic were far more draconian. We cared about life more back then.
People were dumber back then
They were particularly draconian for some people owned by folks living in Democratic Party strongholds who weren’t allowed to travel until 1865 when a Republican president lifted said restrictions.
It took a lot of courage for Robby to come out as a conservative and for Liz to admit she voted for Trump. I'm guessing the Reason cocktail party conversation can get a little frosty these days. Maybe Welch and Bailey just hang out at the bar until someone shouts Tariffs! to break the ice. Always a croud pleaser.
And don’t you know they really want to break the ICE.
This piece by Welch shows remarkable insensitivity to the scores of children overburdened with mitochondrial challenges, and to all mitochondrially challenged individuals generally.
Chuck Norris has never been mitochondrially challenged. The mitochondria know better.
You monster! What about the people that identify as mitochondrially challenged ?
kids are effin OBESE, depressed, drugged, asocial. HALF THE SHITE THEY EAT ISN'T FOOD. SO YES...WE HAVE A PROBHLEM
Don't you have a red wedding to be guest of honor at? Sorry, you were wishing a gruesome murder on everyone you disagree with and now you think you have any authority to tell anyone anything? Fuck you, if anything, your bias should preclude you from being a journalist or in public anywhere but I'll settle for ignoring your ravings.
RFK Jr. is one dumb motherfucker. His brain is all scrambled and half the shit he says makes no sense.
Or maybe you can’t comprehend it.
Then half makes sense. That's more than Biden or Harris.
Another LGBTQ community member calling for jihad against Christians:
https://x.com/ShadowofEzra/status/1961446298143408543
What's I2MAP+? Chopped liver?
Is that community shooting up schools and dropping tranifestos threatening or calling for that to occur?
"Neither cranks nor hacks should head HHS". Well, those are the only choices we are offered. I'll take hacks over cranks. Bring back Becerra, fire Kennedy.
If you have been to an airport or any crowded place, you know he isn’t wrong.
We had damn near five years of COVID horseshit that was literally voodoo and figuratively flat-earth shit. We've got supreme court justices ruling on cases that directly affect women's issues, who can't define what a woman is.
Look, I used to think that people who thought vaccines cause autism were crazy-pants cranks, but if I have to have one of them running HHS, but they're skeptical of the COVID/GENDER AFFIRMING CARE voodoo flat earth shit, then I'll take anyone who says:
"Anyone who had any power or leadership role at the CDC during Covid deserves to be fired," conservative media personality Buck Sexton tweeted this week. "The failure was that universal and cowardice that widespread."
I have no idea who Buck Sexton is-- and if you'd have just given me the name and not his pedigree, I'd have assumed "gay porn actor". But Buck Sexton is 100% right. Swamp: Drain it.
You are thinking of his cousin, Buck Naked.
ENB did an article about him. Vaguely recall his favorite fluffer being named Mike Laursen or something like that.
Thing is Welch, you guys think cranks and hacks are the people you disagree with. You think Fauci and company are the people to head these agencies.
*I* think Kennedy is less likely to do as much harm as the establishment voices - even including his crankery.
Kennedy isn't likely to 'diagnose' gun violence as an 'epidemic' so that it is now brought under the remit of the CDC. Kennedy isn't likely to promulgate bullshit nutritional advice as if it was settled science. Kennedy isn't likely to deliberately lie to you 'for the greater good'.
The choice right now is not between cranks and hacks, and 'the right people'. Its just between cranks and hacks.
And I choose the crank.
I'd rather my cranky hack reduce government meddling than increase it.
The HHS is another useless, expensive and onerous bureaucracy the US can do without regardless of who is in charge of it.
"He literally makes zero sense," opined radiologist, pandemic-policy critic, and National Review contributor Pradheep Shanker. "Wacky, flat-earth, voodoo stuff," added Biden-administration Covid-19 response coordinator Ashish Jha. The Bulwark's culture editor went with "dumbass fucking witch doctor charlatan."
Do men have periods? Can they get pregnant? What is chestfeeding? What in all that is holy is this demented cosplay? Do women get prostate cancer? What is the statistical likelihood of a family having multiple transgender children?
Glass houses, guys.