The U.K.'s Roundabouts Free Drivers From the Tyranny of Traffic Lights
Roundabouts are more efficient because they let drivers rely on themselves, not an inert piece of infrastructure.

This is part of Reason's 2025 summer travel issue. Click here to read the rest of the issue.
Americans don't agree on much, but nobody enjoys traffic. Our commutes often leave us feeling like we're going in circles. But what if I told you that literally driving in circles is the best, safest, and most efficient form of civil engineering?
Roundabouts are an alternative to traffic lights and stop signs in which the road forms a circle at an intersection. Instead of coming to a complete stop before going straight or turning, cars enter and move clockwise through the circle, yielding to those already in motion but otherwise maintaining some level of speed before exiting in their desired direction. (Though visually similar, roundabouts are different from traffic circles, which have larger medians and lower capacities. While still preferable to traffic lights or stop signs, traffic circles are otherwise mostly decorative. And the less said about traffic lights in roundabouts, the better.)
The law demands a motorist come to a complete stop at a stop sign, no matter if any cars are coming. Traffic lights can offer an advantage: Some use magnets to detect traffic loads, but others run on timers, switching to red even if there's no traffic going the other way. In either case, traffic lights can malfunction, turning into a de facto stop sign the same way a broken escalator becomes an expensive staircase. Besides, frequently stopping, starting, and idling wastes time, wastes gas, and puts unnecessary wear and tear on your brakes.
But at a roundabout, motorists keep driving through the intersection so long as it's safe to do so. This sounds risky, but since everyone slows down a little bit and every car is constantly turning, roundabouts significantly lower the risk of high-speed impacts. "The net result of lower speeds and reduced conflicts at roundabouts is an environment where crashes that cause injury or fatality are substantially reduced," according to the U.S. Federal Highway Administration.
Further, roundabouts are perhaps the least infantilizing form of traffic control. Red lights are just crossing guards for adults, and stop signs require you to wait your turn even if you're the only one waiting. Roundabouts are more efficient because they let drivers rely on themselves, not an inert piece of infrastructure.
Some drivers don't like roundabouts or find them confusing. While there are estimated to be more than 9,000 in the U.S., the modern concept originated in Europe, where drivers are more accustomed to them. "The roundabout is said to have flourished in Britain because it requires the British virtues of compromise and cooperation," London-based journalist Stephen Beard wrote in 2013. "The U.S.'s more aggressive, confrontational culture may explain why the roundabout has not been more widely adopted by Americans."
One particularly complex example is the Magic Roundabout in Swindon, England, built in 1972 and effectively unchanged since. That junction, which connects five roads at a busy intersection, is one giant roundabout that also contains five smaller ones on its outer edges, plus another that runs in the opposite direction around the central median. The complex design allows drivers to take more straightforward routes through the circle, yielding to but otherwise swirling around one another.
Reception is mixed: Last year, the Roundabout Appreciation Society (yes, there is such a thing) named it the U.K. Roundabout of the Year, while in 2007, the BBC named it one of the country's "10 scariest junctions." But despite its complexity and reputation, the Magic Roundabout is very safe, registering only 14 serious accidents in its first 25 years of use.
Of course, there is no such thing as a perfect solution. Some motorists will hate roundabouts or have trouble getting used to them. For that matter, they may not work in every application. But roundabouts ease traffic congestion in perhaps the most libertarian way possible: by empowering motorists to make their own decision at an intersection, rather than having a sign or a signal make it for them.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Roundabouts Free Drivers From the Tyranny of Traffic Lights."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
they let drivers rely on themselves
But they also require relying on other drivers, who are often drunk, retarded, or senile. The best figures I've seen indicate that switching from lights to a traffic circle slightly increases the number of collisions, but reduces the number of collisions with serious injuries or damages. More fender benders, less flying through the windshield.
And Muslim, or woman
Or Haitian.
Whatever data you're looking at is nonsense. Roundabouts greatly reduce serious accidents and slightly reduce all accidents- even in the US where drivers receive zero training/info in how to navigate one. And a well designed roundabout doesn't depend on other drivers so much as it requires slower speed (which is always faster than stopping). Most American roundabouts are poorly designed and require signs/paint to slow drivers down. The road itself should slow drivers down. Both in the approach and with the reverse camber of the roundabout itself. The problem is American road designers engineer roads so drivers are comfortable at the highest speed possible.
You really have no idea how and why streets and roads are designed as they are. Engineers for years have tried to calm residential traffic with narrower streets and on-street parking. Fire departments get pissed off and demand that streets be made to accommodate their biggest trucks at speeds well above the designated speed limit. Fault them.
When road engineers actually close some roads to drivers (spec thru traffic and rat runs), then I will fault fire depts.
There is no amount of 'calming' that can occur when peds, bikes, SUV's and other traffic mix
I agree on that point, I find calming circles end up pushing a car into conflict if I'm walking/running when we reach an intersection and both are going straight. In the past we'd both have room (stop sign or uncontrolled intersection) now we both share the same spot to go straight at the intersection as they have been pushed outward to "slow" which really isn't happening and instead two different parties with different modes of transportation are upset.
Policing and emergency response is considered in neighborhood and road system designs.
Traffic circles are the best. Los Angeles smog would most likely decrease from traffic circles. because cars are not sitting there idling.
The UAE has virtually no lights. Every intersection is a traffic circle.
If you want to turn left on main roads or access businesses on the other side of the road you actually go into a U turn lane. The opposing traffic has large speed bumps which force them to slow down where the U turn entrances are so incoming traffic can merge.
You really do not stop driving until you reach your destination for the most part throughout Abu Dhabi or Dubai.
I'd think America would support this traffic circle and u turn design as it reduces traffic and time travelling helping keep the rat race on the go.
Yes, comparison of such disparate sized territories is always useful.
That's a fair assessment from SE Massachusetts where we have both roundabouts and traffic circles.
But, the roundabout does require the drivers to 1) know the rules and 2) give a damn. If you have an area filled with (M)assholes, these things will increase your blood pressure for sure. OTOH, if the drivers understand that the thing is to do a gentle merge into flowing traffic, and then use their blinkers when about to exit, and not try to treat it all as just one more excuse to move one more carlength ahead, then fine.
Not a fan.
I find a roundabout benefits a taker and to that point I guess they work. The timid give way to the aggressive and reduce wrecks where as the 4 way or uncontrolled require a recognition more fully of first come first serve model. I don't see studies addressing this as the factor for less (however small or large less) wrecks (also ignoring for this point the severity part mentioned below).
Also, ask the Native Americans how trading real estate for infrastructure and logistics worked out.
Look kids, Big Ben. And there’s Parliament.
You know who else went on vacation in Europe?
The black plague had a European tour.
I heard a lot of people participated.
The 8th Airforce?
""The roundabout is said to have flourished in Britain because it requires the British virtues of compromise and cooperation," London-based journalist Stephen Beard wrote in 2013. "The U.S.'s more aggressive, confrontational culture may explain why the roundabout has not been more widely adopted by Americans.""
Typical British blowing smoke up their own nether regions, but those British virtues have led to their current authoritarian government, where free speech is under grave threat and out group preference is such a norm, the systemic rape of British girls is covered up for fear of inciting tensions.
They have themselves to blame.
They should have kicked the Rothchilds**** out of the country long ago.
The U.K. is now an occupied country where the most common name for a newborn male is....Muhammed.
Are you saying that many Muslims have moved to Britain because a Jewish family runs the country?
The law demands a motorist come to a complete stop at a stop sign, no matter if any cars are coming.
Ya, but no one does. You slow down, then roll through.
I stop. Not doing so ingrains the habit of rolling through when it is not all clear. I’m not rushing home to catch a cable tv cartoon depicting a tiny penis.
I recall being warned, that as a "flatlander" with out of state plates in a small VT town, to stop, count to three, and then drive. The alternative was apparently a prime source of income for the town.
Roundabouts have made their way up here in Northern Michigan ie: Traverse City and after several years many still don't get it.
Elderly don't like them at all. Then, there are those who don't care.
The streets and main roads through T.C. have been choked with traffic due to population increase.
Well, you have to be crazy to live in northern Michigan in the winter, so keep that in mind.
We're all crazy up here but you have to be utterly nuts to live down below/ Grand Rapids, Lansing Detroit.
The problem is that they're moving up here.
The population of metropolitan Traverse City has grown to over 153,000! Just two weeks ago a mad slasher attacked nine people at the local Wal Mart.
Why was I not surprised or shocked?
I can deal with roundabouts. What I don't like are new-age intersections where turn lanes get separated and sent in various directions sometimes ending up on the left side of oncoming traffic, and with multiple signal lights to get through the intersection.
Supposedly those flow better than regular intersections because traffic is not waiting as long for the opposing traffic to turn.
They do help somewhat but not as good as a traffic circle.
One of my favorite road signs anywhere. And it's just a quarter mile down the road from this sign which isn't exactly accurate and doesn't match the markings on the roadway either. Rumor I've always heard is that this is a "Junior Expressway" and the guy who invented it killed himself.
I've never hated them, I just think they're overused and a bit faddish, often just an excuse to unnecessarily spend taxpayer money. They get thrown in too many intersections where they aren't needed or helpful.
But I'll admit this framing made me see roundabouts in a bit of a new light. I was just griping last night again about how stupid red left turn lights are. They are an obnoxious exercise in nannyism - "No, sorry, you're too stupid to decide that it's safe to make a left turn now even though the rest of your traffic flow gets to proceed and there's no oncoming traffic for a half mile."
Roundabouts put a lot more agency and freedom in drivers' hands and out of the control of traffic engineers.
I agree. Where appropriate, roundabouts can be great (if people know how to use them). But they do seem to be trendy and overused in some places. I know of several locally that could just be turning lanes and disrupt traffic less. Better than putting in a bunch of stop signs, though.
I think they can effectively replace 3 and 4 way stop signs, but my experience with them is that they are garbage on 4 lane roads in replacing stop lights. People don't know how to use them and they can get bogged down quickly by traffic coming from one direction.
Putting in roundabouts should lead to a rethink about how many intersections there are. Roundabouts work best when the traffic flows in all directions are reasonably comparable.
If you have an arterial going through residential areas, then the residential traffic should be channeled into fewer 'exits' to the world - with most other residential traffic for that residential area rather than for thru traffic. The one good idea of suburban street design was making streets hierarchical - accompanied with the windy roads (v a simple grid - which allows development over time) shit in those residential areas.
My biggest problem or peeve is that it's tit-for-tat for the vast majority of intersections and the intersections where roundabouts offer distinct advantage, they are seldom used.
The roundabout takes up more land and if traffic is so low that a stop sign or stoplight is doing the job, a roundabout is an attempt to fix what isn't broken. Even for the lights and turn lanes as you indicate, the two roads have to be of approximately equal traffic volume, otherwise unlike with stoplights that you can bias in one direction or the other, you're permanently fucking up the main road to serve a lesser side road equally.
It's when you have an intersection of several roads in less than the space of about a city block or in and around a major parking lot that roundabouts don't take up any more space than the fucked up geometry dictates and still facilitates the flow of traffic among all the routes through the intersection.
Yes!
To be accurate, what Lancaster calls a traffic circle is called a roundabout in Britain, and what he calls a roundabout is called a mini-roundabout.
Mini-roundabouts are vastly superior to the four-way stop signs that infest the US.
Amusingly, for years in France the rule was that motorists on the roundabout had to give priority to motorists entering it - but eventually they realised that this was stupid.
Akshually……
Central planners keep trying to make roundabouts a thing here, and to that I say: Get Bent.
Better, simpler idea: Replace Stop signs in lower traffic areas with Yield signs.
A roundabout is in effect a junction with unsigned yielding. but less uncertainty.
I suspect your opposition to roundabouts is based on two things, one, they're foreign, and two, it's too much of a change
My opposition to roundabouts stems from:
1. They take up significantly more room than is necessary for an interchange, especially when you put them at an intersection as simple as a 2, 3, or 4, way orthogonal.
2. City / traffic planners are seemingly wanting to put them in all sorts of places where they are not necessary, the like above mentioned simple intersections, and places without the traffic flow to justify them.
3. Many of these new ones are improperly sized to be conducive to the uninterrupted flow of traffic, but rather intended to impede it. A small roundabout at a simple intersection between two roads without much traffic isn't much more than a fancy, horizontal speed bump. So the central planners are either being very stupid or deliberately annoying. Or both.
4. People are bad enough drivers without asking them to navigate these things in places where they shouldn't be expected. Roundabouts cause more accidents than they prevent when they are used improperly.
5. I don't much care for city and highway planners in general, so they can suck it.
With regard to Point 4, there is an entire channel dedicated to drivers encountering just a single badly designed roundabout in Milwaukee:
https://www.youtube.com/@MilwaukeeRoundabout
Example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vmi8AjlNDlY&ab_channel=MilwaukeeRoundabout
This/these are the ones that irritate the hell out of me the most.
There is no way that isn't pure "I'm just fucking with you." You only have to play the "OK, this seems excessive. Which roundabout is the unnecessary one?" for about five seconds to realize it.
Roundabouts are great, as deployed in the British Isles. As deployed in the United States, they're very nearly as inefficient as stop signs.
The trouble is radius. In Britain, roundabouts often have a radius of 100m. This allows for a broad enough circle to keep traffic moving without too much braking required. American traffic engineers don't build them this way.....pretty much ever. Instead, they build tight-radius traffic circles that require slowing to 20 mph. They don't like to talk about that part, but they consider the slowing a feature, not a bug. What it does is to consume more of my brake lining and fuel on a long arterial than a chain of mostly green lights at 45 mph.
The US DOT Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices needs to be updated by the federal government to require states to expand roundabout radii under threat of losing federal tax dollars. Watch as the car haters who run blue state DOTs whine incessantly at having their favorite toy taken away.
Does anyone have a way to get a hold of Sean Duffy?
The whole point of roundabouts is to slow traffic down - by road design rather than signs and paint. Not to make drivers comfortable at high speed
The purpose of road design should be to facilitate the safe free flow of traffic, not to deliberately slow people down just because you get a thrill out of controlling behavior. Totalitarians love that control shit, don't you?
Roundabouts?
No.
Roundabouts are fine for lower traffic situations, Lancaster. If you really want to move traffic, you time the signals and prohibit left turns like along 8 Mile Road, 16 Mile Road, or Telegraph Road around Metro Detroit. There, you can drive for miles on end without encountering a red signal. If you want to turn left, you go past the intersection to a u-turn area, and then you come back to the intersection to turn right.
When driving in Detroit, the best thing to do is to keep driving until you are no longer in Detroit, and keep going. No u turns.
. "The U.S.'s more aggressive, confrontational culture may explain why the roundabout has not been more widely adopted by Americans."
Um, they're all over the place in maga-flyover country, just so you know.
Oh, and to throw a wrench into my statement above, Seattle famously has no stop signs in many of it's in-city neighborhoods, just a little mini-roundabout in many (we call them a traffic revision) or everyone just kind of slows down yields and moves on.
More than 30 people a day are arrested in Britain for online posts. Thank god Lancaster is here to tell us about the libertarian traffic circles. The other thing is too local and has nothing to do with libertarianism.
They don't have an enumerated right to free speech so that doesn't really... oh wait...
Some roundabouts become so popular that they use...
...traffic lights to control access, like the one in this very picture.
Roundabouts are a "solution" in search of a problem in the sparsely inhabited West and Alaska, where I spend most of my time. Furthermore, snow removal within these "solutions" can be a bit problematic, in my experience.
Banked outward turns on roundabouts in snow icy areas can be fun...
I was promised flying cars... not smashing knuckleheads off the roundabout because they don't how to yield.
Roundabouts are the new thing in traffic control here in NEOH. They result in fewer fatalities than traditional crossing intersections, but they result in more accidents overall.
So....
Instead of coming to a complete stop before going straight or turning, cars enter and move clockwise through the circle
Some drivers don't like roundabouts or find them confusing.
You confused me right off the bat by saying you move CLOCKWISE through the circle. In the US we drive on the right side of the road, unlike Britain, so you'd proceed counter-clockwise through the roundabout.
I wonder if Lancaster just copied and pasted that sentence or paragraph from something published in Britain, where they do proceed clockwise through the roundabout. Or maybe he had AI write his copy and the AI didn't switch the direction of travel through the roundabout for an American reader. I know, we'd all be shocked, shocked I tell ya, to find out that Lancaster phones in his articles.
Circles/roundabouts are not a panacea, that's a myth. Once traffic gets heavy enough, the traffic circle completely breaks down. That's why I've seen many traffic circles in the UK with stop lights.
That was an evolutionary route many circles in NY & NJ went thru before being redone completely (as signalized intersections or over/underpass interchanges) as volumes continued to increase.
Funny choice of word: the roundabout itself is more inert than a stoplight.
Traffic circles, of whatever size and description, are a good control device within certain parameters of traffic volume. and a bad one outside them. Many interchanges/intersections that used to function well with circles and the prima facie rule of yielding to vehicles already in the circle needed to be retrofit with additional controls or redesigned or bypassed as traffic volume on one or more of the roads increased.
I had the essential difference between roundabout and traffic circle/rotary explained to me: that the circle (rotary) is a circular roadway with entrances and exits, while the roundabout is an intersection with an obstacle in the middle. Blay Tarnoff told me that when got driving licenses in France and Spain, he was taught to treat any intersection as if it had a little island in the center, which means cars approaching from opposite directions to turn left would have to go around each other instead of doing it in front of each other; the French-Spanish/roundabout way therefore is fucked, easily gridlocked. The Chicago boulevard "kamikaze" left turns were the opposite to the extreme.
Roundabouts would be more fun if they made them vertical.
I long ago decided that the solution to roundabouts and four-way stops that depend on the driver's knowledge of right-of-way was to have hood mounted gatling guns and rocket launchers installed on my vehicle.
But the stupid cops and state officials are all like, "Motorists can't just murder other motorists because they're stupid and in the way and slowing you down, AT."
I agree with that. I don't think EVERYONE should be allowed to have traffic clearing ordinance mounted to their cars. Just me.
I am willing to accept a concession with a law that says, "The only one allowed to drive is AT."
In driving in the UK for two weeks last year (for a total of ~1600 miles), I found three problems with roundabouts:
* If you have a roundabout with entrances A, B, and C, and there's a lot of traffic going from A to C, and you're trying to enter from B, you... can't.
* A little tiny paint-on-the-ground roundabout at the top of a T is still a roundabout, with the "first guy in wins" rule, but try telling that to the people who are crossing the top of the T while you're trying to come in through the stem.
* They simply suck for pedestrians.