The Next Wave of Socialist Politicians Will Bring Crisis, Not Change
From free buses to rent control, their big promises ignore the hard lessons of socialism’s failures.

The Socialist politicians are coming!
In Minneapolis, Democratic Socialist Omar Fateh is favored to be Minneapolis' next mayor.
In New York City, bettors say there's an 80 percent chance that socialist Zohran Mamdani will be the next mayor.
"We have to continue to elect more socialists, and we have to ensure we are unapologetic about our socialism," says Mamdani.
But he should be apologetic! Socialism wrecks lives.
My last column/video covered some of Mamdani's bad ideas, but he has so many, I needed part II:
Mamdani promises buses "fast and free for every New Yorker."
Free would be nice, if the city could afford it. It can't.
And it's a peculiar proposal from a man who complains about what government does now: "These are the slowest buses in the country!"
Will they move faster when they're free?
Public transport is a good example of socialist confusion about what makes things work.
I ask people, "Who do you think built New York's subways?" Most say: "the government."
Who else could afford to dig tunnels and buy trains so everyone, rich and poor, can ride? Private businesses wouldn't do it. They wouldn't be able to charge enough to cover their costs. That's why government must do it!
But actually, private companies built most of New York's subways. The trains only became government-run after 1939, when the capitalists proposed raising the fare from 5 to 7 cents.
NYC's mayor called that "a grab for the public's pocket" and took control.
He promised they wouldn't raise the fare.
But within a few years, the fare was 10 cents. Now it's $2.90.
And when NYC tries to build new subways, they struggle to get it done.
One train line was supposed to be finished in 1938. Then they said 1980. Today, it's still not done, but it's already the world's most expensive subway.
They work so slowly that subway cars built for it (they cost a million dollars each) can no longer be used; they don't fit the tracks.
That's government work.
Mamdani also promises to make workers' lives better by raising the minimum wage to $30 an hour.
That's popular. But just dumb.
Last year, California demanded fast-food workers be paid at least $20 an hour. Unions and politicians cheered.
But when companies have to pay even beginners $20 an hour, they employ fewer people.
Pizza Hut laid off 1,200.
Over the next year, while other states added jobs, 18,000 California fast food workers lost jobs.
Customers also get hit. Even Good Morning America noticed: "Restaurants in the state have increased prices by 10% faster than all other states."
Finally, "Freeze the rent!" shouts Mamdani. Socialists like rent control.
Most voters do, too. But that's because most don't realize that, aside from bombing a city, little destroys apartment buildings more than rent control.
Saint Paul, Minnesota, imposed rent control in 2021. Multifamily building permits fell by 80 percent. In Minneapolis, its twin city, building permits increased.
So St. Paul rolled back its rent control.
But now Minneapolis' likely new mayor wants to impose it? Don't socialists ever learn?
No.
The vice president of the Minneapolis City Council is a socialist. I once asked her, "Where has [socialism] ever worked?"
She was silent an interminable nine seconds.
Finally, she said, "I'm doing a fine job representing my community."
Her policies would wreck her community.
George Will says he wants Mamdani to win because, "Every 20 years, we need to experiment with socialism" so people can watch it fail.
But can't the model of failure be what Gov. J.B. Pritzker is doing to Illinois? Gov. Gavin Newsom bankrupting California? We need a third example?
Sadly, we're about to get one.
I want to ask my likely new mayor, "How will your socialism succeed when every other, everywhere in the world, brought poverty and misery?"
So far, he hasn't responded to my interview requests.
COPYRIGHT 2025 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
[sing-songy voice] not a socialiiiiiist
They will fuck up too, causing “not socialist” socialists to socialist harder.
Just need to tweak social security, implement a national healthcare plan, crack down on dangerous right-wing speech (aka domestic terrorists), get increasing rent under control, and pass some common sense gun control laws. You know, essentially libertarianism.
Amazing how fast the USA got conquered and bankrupt once the So[zi]alist[s] came to town.
Guess the USA better plan on another Civil War with the Party-of-Slavery because they just won't stop trying to STEAL/ENSLAVE everyone.
Let it fail, John.
The time to move out of NY is now.
"The Next Wave of Socialist Politicians Will Bring Crisis, Not Change."
In other news, scientists have discovered the sun's surface is a tad on the warm side.
As the USSR failed how did the socialists respond?
Hoarders!
There's always someone else to scapegoat.
There's always someone else to scapegoat.
One more thing you have in common with the leftists you hate.
One more thing you have in common with the leftists you hate.
This brings to mind an old Smothers Brothers bit I saw recently (paraphrasing, since I'm too lazy to look up a clip of it to verify the wording):
Tom: We should have a big convention where leaders of every religion come together, and meet, and talk about the one thing that they all have in common.
Dick: The one thing they all have in common? You mean a belief in a supreme being?
Tom: No, that they all think that they are the only ones that are right.
Once again we see sarc's assertions have literally no relationship to reality whatsoever. You'd think he'd eventually quit embarrassing himself but there's a reason I've always said the number one requirement to be a leftist is the willingness to say stupid shit in public.
"I don't know what a woman is, I'm not a biologist".
I thought George Will was smarter than this.
They will just blame it on capitalists picking on it. Wreckers. Kulaks. It's the same old story. Socialism never fails; it is always murdered by capitalists.
George Will says he wants Mamdani to win because, "Every 20 years, we need to experiment with socialism" so people can watch it fail.
That's like saying that we should make sure that there are large outbreaks of measles or polio very 20 years so that people will understand why vaccination is necessary.
Few if any desire to contract measles or polio. But there are many weasels that want to go socialist. If NYC wants this, let them have it good and hard.
But keeping it out of D.C. will be a trick.
Especially with NYC already mostly just a butt child of D.C.
The "conquer and consume" so[zi]alist head is all about "conquering and consuming" MORE and MORE and MORE and MORE. A whole slew of historical socialist nations trying to "conquer" other nations and "consume" their resources when their local well runs dry.
Which is exactly why Federal Taxes are so much more than State Taxes.
The [Na]tional expansion of failing So[zi]alist[s] criminal heads.
I agree with Will on this. A “hold my beer” moment for NYC. I hope they get all of it.
One of the things I like about my Chartertopia fantasy is the core government is powerless and anyone who wants more, like public schools, safety standards, contraband and taboos, is free to join together contractually for whatever government they want, the only exception being slavery; people are free to quit at any time, losing any vested Ponzi pensions or rent control seniority, but still able to quit.
I want that inoculation aspect. I think one of the biggest problems we have is all the rabble rousers spouting off nonsense that people have no way of countering. It's one thing to read about bread lines ("shows how much people like socialist bread" says Bernie) and empty store shelves in some foreign place where they don't even speak a civilized language, but that's about as useful as people who play war games and think they know how dangerous it is.
Whereas if there were little scattered socialist communities all around the place, if everyone lived within 50 or 100 miles of one, they'd meet those people daily, work with them, shop with them, and visit once in a while, and know how crappy their stores are and what miserable lives they lead, with so little of their own money to spend, embezzlement, corruption, the pigs that are more equal. The ones that required members to work and shop in government businesses would have less opportunity to mingle with free people, but word would always leak out.
These cities with their socialist mayors will just blame all their failures on capitalism, and most people simply have no way of knowing how wrong they are. That famous New Yorker cartoon of the world as seen from New York is true. They will just blame it on those people out there.
While true the left's ability to control public messaging is close to dead. Their own adherents will never learn but a material part of the country is unaligned and potentially persuadable either way. A couple of percentage points is a massive change.
John Stossel needs to stop for a minute and think about why people are voting for a socialist. Maybe because if you are member of the working poor the new OBBB is likely to cost you $1200 per year. Maybe because you are likely to lose Medicaid coverage. Maybe because you will be paying more because of tariffs. Socialism maybe bad but then again capitalism is not such a great things for you either. Yes capitalism is great if you are rich, but not if you are just a working stiff.