Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Donald Trump

Enigmas Never Age

Plus: Throuple reproduction, weight-loss drug competition, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 7.18.2025 9:34 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Photo of Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump help up in congressional hearing | Rod Lamkey - CNP/Sipa USA/Newscom
(Rod Lamkey - CNP/Sipa USA/Newscom)

May every day be another wonderful…secret? Yesterday, The Wall Street Journal published new revelations about the relationship between financier/pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and President Donald Trump. For Epstein's 50th birthday, his longtime partner Ghislaine Maxwell put together a leather-bound book with notes from his friends. One was allegedly written and signed by Trump.

Trump's entry "contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker. A pair of small arcs denotes the woman's breasts, and the future president's signature is a squiggly 'Donald' below her waist, mimicking pubic hair," reports The Wall Street Journal. The text within the naked-lady outline appears to be an imagined conversation between Epstein and Trump. "Voice Over: There must be more to life than having everything," the note begins.

Donald: Yes, there is, but I won't tell you what it is.

Jeffrey: Nor will I, since I also know what it is. 

Donald: We have certain things in common, Jeffrey.

Jeffrey: Yes, we do, come to think of it. 

Donald: Enigmas never age, have you noticed that? 

Jeffrey: As a matter of fact, it was clear to me the last time I saw you. 

Trump: A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday—and may every day be another wonderful secret.

"This is not me," said Trump. "This is a fake thing. It's a fake Wall Street Journal story. I never wrote a picture in my life. I don't draw pictures of women," he said. "It's not my language. It's not my words."

Epstein has a long track record of sexually abusing young girls. He died in 2019 in jail under circumstances still debated to this day (suicide? Offed by someone who wanted him dead?) after being arrested by the FBI on sex trafficking charges. This was his second round: In 2008, he had pleaded guilty to a state charge of procuring a minor for prostitution and served 18 months; he had received extraordinarily lenient treatment in prison, which sure looked a bit like corruption. His associate/girlfriend, Maxwell, was convicted in 2021 for sex trafficking and conspiracy, helping Epstein procure girls as young as 14 for prostitution.

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

An outstanding question is how much his rich and famous friends knew about his perversions and horrifying crimes. "I've known Jeff for 15 years," Trump told New York magazine back in 2002. "Terrific guy."

"It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side," said Trump. "No doubt about it—Jeffrey enjoys his social life."

Trump appears all over Epstein's flight logs, indicating he took trips with him on his private jet: Trump's name appears four times in 1993, once in 1994, once in 1995, and once in 1997. One of Epstein's victims said she was recruited by Epstein while at Trump's club, Mar-a-Lago, and that she was "passed around like a platter of fruit" as a teenager to the rich and famous of Palm Beach. (The woman who was abused as a teenager died by suicide earlier this year.)

Trump's base has long been riled up about what the government might be hiding about Epstein, and Trump has at times stoked this, at other times hedged, saying that there might be "phony stuff in there." The Department of Justice and the FBI under Trump have indicated that the uncovered Epstein files don't include evidence that justifies further, deeper investigations into specific linked parties. "The video recordings of child sexual abuse material found by investigators were not videos that Mr. Epstein recorded of crimes by himself or his friends, but material he downloaded," according to Attorney General Pam Bondi, per a New York Times writeup. Phase 1 of the Epstein files release—initially lauded as a Trump administration attempt at transparency—came under lots of heat because a) they were released to various right-wing influencers who don't have great reporting chops, per se, and b) they didn't really contain anything new or of note that wasn't already public.

"I don't understand it—why they would be so interested," Trump said of his base. "He's dead for a long time. He was never a big factor in terms of life. I don't understand what the interest or what the fascination is, I really don't."

Now, following The Wall Street Journal's reporting on the Trump signature-as-pubic-hair story and the "enigmas never age" thing, Trump has threatened to sue the Journal.

"The Wall Street Journal, and Rupert Murdoch, personally, were warned directly by President Donald J. Trump that the supposed letter they printed by President Trump to Epstein was a FAKE and, if they print it, they will be sued. Mr. Murdoch stated that he would take care of it but, obviously, did not have the power to do so. The Editor of The Wall Street Journal, Emma Tucker, was told directly by Karoline Leavitt, and by President Trump, that the letter was a FAKE, but Emma Tucker didn't want to hear that. Instead, they are going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story anyway. President Trump will be suing The Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp, and Mr. Murdoch, shortly," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "The Press has to learn to be truthful, and not rely on sources that probably don't even exist. President Trump has already beaten George Stephanopoulos/ABC, 60 Minutes/CBS, and others, and looks forward to suing and holding accountable the once great Wall Street Journal. It has truly turned out to be a 'Disgusting and Filthy Rag' and, writing defamatory lies like this, shows their desperation to remain relevant. If there were any truth at all on the Epstein Hoax, as it pertains to President Trump, this information would have been revealed by Comey, Brennan, Crooked Hillary, and other Radical Left Lunatics years ago. It certainly would not have sat in a file waiting for 'TRUMP' to have won three Elections. This is yet another example of FAKE NEWS!"

I like that he says "sources that probably don't exist" (emphasis mine). He seems moderately sure that this defense will work, but not completely, like he wants to keep the door open to take another tack if need be. And now, vast swaths of the right wing keep coming to Trump's defense, claiming the Journal—not a particularly left-wing paper, mind you!—fabricated it all.

This is not how Trump talks at all. I don't believe it. https://t.co/XVAReN80ZL

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) July 17, 2025

This is the dumbest attempted hit piece I've ever read. https://t.co/QSPdtnNWat

— Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) July 17, 2025

Trump doesn't talk like this at all. And this was several years before Epstein was originally arrested https://t.co/O8mWy2XrQh

— Jack Poso ???????? (@JackPosobiec) July 17, 2025

Forgive my language but this story is complete and utter bullshit. The WSJ should be ashamed for publishing it.

Where is this letter? Would you be shocked to learn they never showed it to us before publishing it? Does anyone honestly believe this sounds like Donald Trump? https://t.co/KHsTFOSl34

— JD Vance (@JDVance) July 17, 2025

I don't know what's true or false here, what's being hidden, what the Journal's sourcing is like (though they tend to be pretty careful with their reporting), what is boilerplate bawdiness versus admission of knowledge of Epstein's crimes. I won't claim to. I do find it extremely implausible, though, that you can be friends with someone for decades, and travel with them on their private jet, and have no awareness of their horrifying and perverted sex crimes. Powerful people enabled this man in some form. I can't judge the extent of their knowledge; I shudder at the extent of their soul-rot. Also, it's a little wild that Trump indulged the conspiracy-obsessed wing of his base, and then has now chosen to backpedal and be rather dismissive of them. Will this create political backlash within Trumpworld, or does their loyalty to him run deeper than this?


Scenes from New York: You've had enough, what with all the Epstein and Trump.


QUICK HITS

  • Our long national nightmare is over. Perhaps John Oliver can be next?
  • Bloomberg investigates "how Hims became the king of knockoff weight-loss drugs."
  • "Eight healthy babies who have genes derived from three different parents have been born healthy in the United Kingdom," reports Ronald Bailey for Reason, calling it a "happy result." He continues: "The treatment involved taking the nucleus from a fertilized egg that contained defective mitochondria and installing it into a donor egg with healthy mitochondria whose nucleus had been removed. Thus, the DNA comprising these babies' genes are derived from the mothers, fathers, and the egg donors." I fear there will increasingly be a difference of opinion between libertarians of faith, like myself, who are concerned about what we lose or destroy when humans play God, and libertarians who greet assisted reproductive technology developments as progress to be welcomed, and who cheer our increasing ability to master and control our biological limitations.
  • A very good point:

My sense from a million miles away is that undergraduate education has rapidly become more pre-professional (look at the flows into and out of comp-sci, for example, in the last few years) and much less about "reading books, getting drunk, and going to parties."

But college… https://t.co/LvFcCpJ9Gp

— Derek Thompson (@DKThomp) July 17, 2025

  • Darkly funny:

Someone at Fox has must've hit the emergency switch because now they're airing a Biden blunder mix pic.twitter.com/0aiEoAHlYR

— Acyn (@Acyn) July 18, 2025

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Conservatives Shouldn't Oppose California's Potential Zoning Reforms

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Donald TrumpJeffrey EpsteinTrump AdministrationScandalConspiracy TheoriesMAGAPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (354)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Chumby   2 months ago

    I’m beginning to think the akita knew the dangers of monkeypox.

    1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      The akita was just angry that he wasn't getting any of that ass.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    ...The Wall Street Journal published new revelations about the relationship between financier/pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and President Donald Trump.

    "New." "Revelations."

    1. Minadin   2 months ago

      It doesn't read like anything he would normally say, and it doesn't seem like the WSJ produced any actual evidence if the existence of this thing they claim is real.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        What about "sources say"?

        1. Jim Conley   2 months ago

          Unnamed sources are the gold-standard of journalistic sources. Unlike on-the-record named sources they have no agenda.

        2. Chumby   2 months ago

          Psaki psays

      2. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

        Meh, Bush put on a Texas accennt when he wanted to and Hillary well

        https://youtu.be/6FlpbRFXC9E?si=Mqc3Asrut-NMtFDz

        1. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

          I'm no fan of W, but he seemed to always have that slight Texas accent every time I heard him speak. He would always say Terr for Terror when talking about the "war on terror."

          not the greatest boaf sides argument.

          1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

            So Connecticut born and raised, but always had that Texas Twang?

            And here's some highlights of Trump and how he has changed his speach from 80s young Trump to campaign Trump

            https://youtu.be/QNwjcoCTtsU?si=kMMsBHhix-vaLTQv

            I don't know anyone who doesn't change their speech patterns over time and settings. And as a master, truly, of persuasion as Scott Adams observed, I'm 100% positive Trump changes his tone, vocabulary and speech patterns based on his audience. He has confirmed that, with "Locker Room Talk" with Billy Bush.

            Not saying any of this report is true, or whether it has anything to do with some illicit conduct. Trump for all we know was just flattering Jeffrey to get him to invest in Trump.

            But since he is protecting the pedos protectors (CIA most likely); fuck him anyway.

            1. Sam Bankman-Fried   2 months ago

              Hastert and Foley and Epstein—the Gay Old Pedos! So the Epstein list has more Republicans than Democrats unfortunately Foley couldn’t be prosecuted but Hastert could. Biden was able to figure out how to prosecute Ghizzstain.

              1. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

                "So the Epstein list has more Republicans than Democrats"

                No it doesn't Shrike. You just say any old bullshit now, huh?

                1. Chumby   2 months ago

                  That's what I love about these high school boys, man. I get older, they stay the same age.

                  - Pluggo’s Glazed and Confused

                  1. InsaneTrollLogic (Muting Sarc like he mutes us)   2 months ago

                    Being Shrike, those are junior high school boys.

            2. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 months ago

              "I know words. I have the best words."

      3. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

        I can't picture Trump doing anything that creative. He's no theater kid.

        1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

          He's no theater kid.

          https://m.imdb.com/name/nm0874339/

          1. Super Scary   2 months ago

            To be fair (to be faaaaaaaiiiiirrrr), almost all of those are just him playing himself. There are few where he's essentially just "super rich guy," but that's what everyone considered him before he got into politics.

            1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

              I don't know, I think his performance in wrestlemania 23 could have given Daniel Day Lewis a run for his money.

              1. Super Scary   2 months ago

                Oh wait, that's true! I forgot about his WWE stuff. He did as good of a job as everyone else involved in that sort of thing so I'll give him props for that.

            2. Chumby   2 months ago

              Trump singing green acres:

              https://m.youtube.com/shorts/c1oAU6Wsd5o

      4. Sir Chips Alot   2 months ago

        Atouk alounda Lana

      5. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

        “It’s a little wild that……”

        Um, Liz….. pull on that thread just a bit more. If the don knew that this “letter” was out there somewhere, why would he have “indulge(d) the conspiracy obsessed wing of his base” in the first place?

        It’s definitely “a little wild” what news reporting has become in the last 10 years.

      6. con_fuse9   2 months ago

        Of course, I wouldn't think that he would say "grab them by the..." but I was wrong.

        Trump and Clinton are cut from the same cloth. A slimy one at that.
        But they both, at the right time, seemed to be able to fool enough of the American people.

      7. Kords   2 months ago

        Maybe not something he would say *now,* but it was 20+ years ago. And I'm afraid that none of us has any real knowledge of how Trump expressed himself in private letters to friends at that time. It would be ridiculously foolish to dismiss the WSJ as a fake simply because you don't think the syntax matches up with your idea of how Trump talks.

    2. Jerry B.   2 months ago

      "New." "Revelations."

      Hopefully, the last chapter.

    3. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      51 intelligence officers have confirmed the 'Trump Letter' to be authentic and not Russian disinformation.

      1. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

        What's Dan Rather doing nowadays?

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          Still writing fiction?

        2. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

          Listening to What's the Frequency, Kenneth by REM?

          1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

            Did we ever find out what the frequency is?

            1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

              Michael stipe was too depressed to tell us.

              Poor guy.

        3. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

          He wanders the Earth undead.

    4. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      If anyone who red the text typed words on that think it was from trump is quite frankly retarded. Sounds nothing like him.

      Yet another fake scandal too juicy to take a second. Wsj didnt even get the original letter lol.

    5. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

      Is there a portrait of Trump wearing a blue dress?

    6. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      I saw someone ask grok how many times Trump has used the word enigma in every single one of his social media posts. The answer was zero.

      1. 5Arete22   2 months ago

        Trump's using the word enigma: https://x.com/Thiss_Youu/status/1946049530492748214

        Article on the subject: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nj.com/politics/2025/07/magas-defense-of-trump-over-1-word-is-immediately-debunked.html%3foutputType=amp

        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

          Page not found.

          1. 5Arete22   2 months ago

            GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND, both links worked when I tried them again a minute ago. I expect that you could find similar material as I did, by web searching on "trump word enigma".

            1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

              The poof is he said enigma one time in the last 25 years?

              1. Chumby   2 months ago

                That Austrian painter’s military used a machine called enigma. Hence, Trump is a nazi!!!!! Arrrrggghhhhh.

              2. Chuck the Sarcasm Police   2 months ago

                Buncha fucking idiots.

                They think Donald used his "special word" between him and his bestie Jeffrey to deride Ben Carson? How much stupider can this get?

          2. Kords   2 months ago

            https://www.nj.com/politics/2025/07/magas-defense-of-trump-over-1-word-is-immediately-debunked.html

      2. n00bdragon   2 months ago

        Gee, I wonder if asking an LLM for factual information could possibly give me the wrong answer?

        It's literally autocorrect, just like on your phone. It predicts the next word in a string and writes that.

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

          As a TDS-addled pile of shit, of course you believe that.

          1. 5Arete22   2 months ago

            Sevo, your argument against n00bdragon's skepticism over the reliability of the AI Grok is that n00bdragon holds this view because you believe that n00bdragon dislikes Pres. Trump.

            Does this argument apply to skepticism toward other AIs, e.g., Microsoft Copilot?

            What is the connection between dislike of Pres. Trump and skepticism toward Grok?

            What us

            1. 5Arete22   2 months ago

              Disregard "What us" in my comment above.

              1. Chumby   2 months ago

                I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say that Sevo likely disregarded the entire post.

      3. con_fuse9   2 months ago

        4 syllables?
        Unlikelikly.

    7. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      Lol.

      Susan Crabtree
      @susancrabtree
      #BREAKING SCOOP re:
      TRUMP’S ALLEGED EPSTEIN BDAY LETTER: The Wall Street Journal reporter who broke the “blockbuster” story alleging a letter Trump wrote to Epstein for his 50th birthday included some tawdry elements previously worked for Main Justice (his only prior reporting experience listed in his bio).

      Main Justice was Glenn Simpson’s wife’s publication. Simpson founded Fusion GPS, which was paid by Hillary Clinton/the DNC (through Perkins Coie) to produce the Steele Dossier at the center of the Russian hoax against Trump.

      Both Glenn Simpson and his wife, Mary Jacoby, worked for the Wall Street Journal before launching their own enterprises.

      Trump is now suing the Wall Street Journal over the “blockbuster” letter story, arguing that it’s bogus and they never showed him it so he could comment.

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        Julie H Wright
        @juliew38138
        ·
        Follow
        Replying to @susancrabtree
        Want to dive even deeper? Mary’s daddy is Jon E.M. Jacoby. He’s a longtime executive at Stephens Investments in Little Rock. Guess who their attorney was? HRC, Rose Law. It’s a small world.

        1. Fetterman's Hump   2 months ago

          Jacobins. All of 'em.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    "I never wrote a picture in my life. I don't draw pictures of women," he said. "It's not my language. It's not my words."

    I believe the president when he claims he never wrote a picture.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Do hurricane maps count?

  4. Chumby   2 months ago

    Enigmas never age

    The song Return to Innocence still holds up.

    1. Wizzle Bizzle   2 months ago

      Yes. It sucks just as much ass now as it did back then.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    He died in 2019 in jail under circumstances still debated to this day (suicide? Offed by someone who wanted him dead?) after being arrested by the FBI on sex trafficking charges.

    I WILL NOT BE PARTY TO A COMMENTS SECTION THAT TRAFFICS IN CONSPIRACY THEORIES.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      What if it's a really cool party on some private island?

    2. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

      So you are going off the grid, then?

    3. Jim Conley   2 months ago

      Why Liz be blamin' de Jews?

      1. Chumby   2 months ago

        Simping for the caliphate about to take control of NYC. Not sure she’ll like it when vaping gets banned.

  6. Chumby   2 months ago

    Meanwhile at Koch Industries HQ

    Staffer 3: Sir, the president just called. He wanted to speak; I reminded him we’re sticking with the standard protocol. He left a message.

    CK: Good. Good. Very good. I don’t want to talk with him. What’s the message?

    Staffer 3: Sir, he reiterated he is still reviewing your proposal.

    CK: What the fuck is taking him so long? Why the fuck is he dragging on this? I sent that to him months ago!

    Staffer 3: Sir, they constructed a pilot facility for testing and are now reviewing the data.

    CK: Oh. I see. Did he say how that went?

    Staffer 3: Sir, yes. He said that this could get green lit. Shortly. They are just working out a few kinks.

    CK: Kinks? What kinks.

    Staffer 3: Sir, they brought in some Amnesty International observers and some journalists…

    CK: …Jesus Christ! Why the fuck did he do that?!?! What the fuck was he thinking?

    Staffer 3: Sir, I had the same thought. He said that he wanted to test real world conditions.

    CK: Couldn’t he fucking wait?

    Staffer 3: Sir, I think so but that’s where the problems developed.

    CK: Problems? What problems?

    Staffer 3: Sir, the kinks. We thought that Akita Alcatraz would be welcoming to visitors; the presence of the dogs would put them at ease. But the akitas did not respect the observers and growled at the journalists.

    CK: What? Why the fuck is that a problem?

    Staffer 3: Sir, it doesn’t match the modeling that Grok performed.

    CK: I don’t see a problem. Tell him to put it into production. Now. We are woefully behind schedule.

    Staffer 3: Sir, understood. One other thing. We uploaded the new data into Grok for further analysis. And, uh, well…he had some things to say. Interesting thin…

    CK: Shit! You’ll have to tell me later. I’ve got a hair appointment in 3 minutes.

    Staffer 3: Sir, understood. Sir, didn’t you get a haircut on Tuesday?

    CK: Yes, I did. Robby is coming in and I’ve got 20 minutes to run my fingers through his locks. Dismissed.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

      Epic.

      1. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 months ago

        Funny stuff. Akita Matata.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    This is the dumbest attempted hit piece I've ever read.

    It's so incredibly dumb that I'm almost inclined to believe it. The alternate theory is that the WSJ is full of TDS addled morons.

    1. The Average Dude (Who's Smarter Than You)   2 months ago

      For MAGA, the latter is obvious.

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        Found a retard who believes it.

    2. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

      "a squiggly 'Donald' below her waist, mimicking pubic hair"

      If the WaPo is dumb enough (they are) to try manufacture a smear using Epstein, why the pubic hair? The whole point is the pedophilia, not escorts.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Didn't the Epstein era coincide with the full Brazilian fad? Or maybe he started it.

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

          In the world of Epstein the landing strips are on the plane.

      2. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

        Puberty starts when now?

        1. Chumby   2 months ago

          Which puberty? The one determined by biology or the cosplay one via pharmaceuticals?

          1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

            Biology

          2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

            Hey, doesn't the school district get a say?

        2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

          These days it can be permanently avoided.

      3. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        WSJ is the source.

    3. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

      I don't see what the big deal is even if he did write the letter.

      A naked woman (with pubic hair so we can assume an adult as ML pointed out) shaped paragraph written before Epstein was a known pedo.

      Did we not already know Trump was a little racy? What am I missing?

      1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

        What am I missing?

        Legitimacy of the WSJ story. It it's real, display it. Until then, it is DNC fantasy.

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

          Yeah we have a verbal description, that's it. Apparently WSJ refused to show it to team Trump.

        2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          True or false, why does it matter?

          If it's true, as QB says, so what?
          If it's false, oh no, your opinion on the legacy media will go down. Quelle horreur! Can it possibly go down from zero?

          Don't see the big deal here.

          OH oh wait, I know: if it's true, it means ammunition for The Left against Trump. And that is intolerable! It is the Most Important Thing to stop The Left at all costs, even if it means altering reality itself. So the claim must be denied even if true.

          1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

            Now pretend it was FOX doing the same thing (unfounded pedo accusations) to Clinton, Obama, AOC, or Biden. You purple haired freaks would be burning shit in leftist cities.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              Oh there we go, the WHATABOUTISM DEFLECTION maneuver!

              All of the people you mention have had their fair share of sex-based smears against them. Clinton - I don't even have to mention. How many times did we hear that Obama had a gay Chicago lover? Or that Michelle Obama was really a transsexual? How many times did we hear about Biden being a pervert and a creep?

              You all really have some nerve. Your team STEALS Biden's daughter's diary and splashes it all over the Internet, having zero shame about sharing all of her innermost secrets, and then try to claim foul play even if this one Trump-Epstein letter turns out to be false.

              1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                Weak.

                1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

                  Jeffy is really bad at this.

                  1. Chumby   2 months ago

                    And portion control.

                    1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                      And not drooling when stories of child porn hit.

                      His Squid game would be an all you can eat buffet on one path and CP on the other.

              2. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

                Whenever Jeffy is caught in hypocrisy he immediately runs to the whataboutism deflection.

                Even the wiki has noticed this technique:

                "Whataboutism can provide necessary context into whether or not a particular line of critique is relevant or fair, and behavior that may be imperfect by international standards may be appropriate in a given geopolitical neighborhood.[8]
                Accusing an interlocutor of whataboutism can also in itself be manipulative and serve the motive of discrediting, as critical talking points can be used selectively and purposefully even as the starting point of the conversation (cf. agenda setting, framing, framing effect, priming, cherry picking).
                The deviation from them can then be branded as whataboutism. Both whataboutism and the accusation of it are forms of strategic framing and have a framing effect.[9]"

                1. Chuck the Sarcasm Police   2 months ago

                  Dissemble. Deflect. Distract.

                  Somebody else did the lying, so he can get right into the deflection.

                2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                  Wait wait I thought Wikipedia was leftwing propaganda. NOW it is a reliable source? Funny how that works.

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

                  From a logical and argumentative point of view, whataboutism is considered a variant of the tu-quoque pattern (Latin 'you too', term for a counter-accusation), which is a subtype of the ad-hominem argument.[2][3][4][5]

                  The communication intent is often to distract from the content of a topic (red herring). The goal may also be to question the justification for criticism and the legitimacy, integrity, and fairness of the critic, which can take on the character of discrediting the criticism, which may or may not be justified. Common accusations include double standards, and hypocrisy, but it can also be used to relativize criticism of one's own viewpoints or behaviors. (A: "Long-term unemployment often means poverty in Germany." B: "And what about the starving in Africa and Asia?").[6] Related manipulation and propaganda techniques in the sense of rhetorical evasion of the topic are the change of topic and false balance (bothsidesism).[7]

                  Funny how you left this part out of your uncited Wikipedia article.

                  But this little side-tangent itself is one of your distraction techniques because you know I'm right but will refuse to admit it.

                  Fuck off gaslighting troll. Your role here is just to muddy the waters, throw sand in the air to obscure the conversation, and that is how you "win".

                  1. InsaneTrollLogic (Muting Sarc like he mutes us)   2 months ago

                    And here I thought Sarc was into projection. Turns out, Jeffy makes Sarc look like an amateur.

                  2. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

                    "Wait wait I thought Wikipedia was leftwing propaganda"?

                    When did I say that? All the political articles have Democratic Party politruks like you working in shifts on the revert edit buttons, but that doesn't mean it's all corrupted.

                    "Funny how you left this part out of your uncited Wikipedia article."

                    Nice try, sealion, but everyone already knows what the definition of 'whataboutism' is, so there was no point in posting the whole fucking article when the paragraphs dealing with the point would do.

                    Also: your uncited Wikipedia article

                    I literally said it was from the wiki article in my comment. You want to talk about gaslighting, you overpaid shill? THAT'S gaslighting.

                    Thank goodness you're so shit at your job, or discrediting you and pointing out your tricks would have been hard.

              3. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

                Clinton was smeared? That’s new to me.

              4. Alberto Balsalm   2 months ago

                100% correct. It's much easier to weaponize sex when you have no idea how to fix the problems of the country. Fire them all. Elon can't start a third party quick enough.

                1. VinniUSMC   2 months ago

                  Why? You'd still be voting for Harris.

                  1. Sam Bankman-Fried   2 months ago

                    The Bush bros protected Epstein because the Page Scandal would have been so much worse had the Bushes not given Epstein a sweetheart deal. Obama still figured out a way to prosecute Hastert. A Marine that was a a member of the GOP—Gay Old Pedos!! Lololololololol!!!

                    1. InsaneTrollLogic (Muting Sarc like he mutes us)   2 months ago

                      Are you retarded or something?

                    2. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

                      He sure is.
                      Somehow he thinks MAGA and the neocons are the same thing when the entire Bush administration told people to vote Kamala last year.
                      Pluggo's political zeitgeist is from 25 years ago.

                2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                  So you were never against DOGE and cuts/audits prior?

                  Another failing lefty who is pretending to be libertarian now that he lost.

              5. InsaneTrollLogic (Muting Sarc like he mutes us)   2 months ago

                So many words to say so little.

          2. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

            True or false, why does it matter?

            Russian election interference
            Trump hooker pee tapes
            Russian bounties on US troops in Iraq
            Fine people on both sides
            Hunter's laptop
            Joes dementia

            1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

              Trump Russia.
              Troop losers.
              Child paegent rapist.
              Trump is hitler.

              Jeff loves all the bullshit the left generates.

              1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                Jeff loves even more that Superior People believe all the bullshit the left generates. Challenging the propaganda system is what really pisses him off.

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                  Oh LOL. You're not challenging the propaganda system, you're trying to usurp it.

                  1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

                    Yes, we’ve started a competitor to the WSJ.

            2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              So what? All of those stories, you believe were deliberate lies foisted by the legacy media on the people in the service of a political agenda. No?

              So if this Trump-Epstein letter turns out to be fabricated, then this would be just one more lie added on to the huge list. Your trust in legacy media would stay exactly the same, at a level of 0.0%. It's like if the View ladies spouted off again against Trump. Who cares at this point?

              1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

                Idiots believe that nonsense then vote. The draw back of democracy. If the dems didn't think the lies influenced people, why keep making new ones?

                1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                  Like all religious zealots, they can't stop themselves.

                2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                  Sure, right. This is some honest desire to stick up for the concept of true and accurate reporting. LOL no one seriously believes this.

                  1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

                    Nobody’s interested in your opinion regarding honesty, Lying Jeffy.

                    This is pathetic.

                    1. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

                      He really is such a piece of shit.

                3. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                  If the dems all politicians everywhere didn't think the lies influenced people, why keep making new ones?

                  there, FIFY

              2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

                You're right. Some people did some stuff. At this point, what difference does it make?

          3. Chumby   2 months ago

            So you are ok with legacy media knowingly publishing a fake story?

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              So you are okay with the government and its media allies jawboning one media outlet into suppressing newsworthy stories if it makes the government look bad?

              1. Chumby   2 months ago

                You answered my question. Thanks.

                1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

                  We all already knew the answer, but it was nice of Lying Jeffy to confirm.

                  1. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

                    Not only is Lying Jeffy okay with it, he wants to make it mandatory. Pravda had nothing on Jeffy's vision for the future.

                    1. Chumby   2 months ago

                      The rear ends justify the means.

            2. Alberto Balsalm   2 months ago

              So you are ok with legacy media knowingly publishing a fake story?

              They've been doing it for decades you braindead idiot. Not just the media; elected officials, pundits, assholes like you etc. Maybe you can join Misek in trying to outlaw lying.

              1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                Calls others assholes while defending media lying about people. Amusing.

                1. Alberto Balsalm   2 months ago

                  Calls others assholes

                  Not "others". Just Chumby. But you are also an asshole.

                  while defending media lying about people.

                  I did no such thing. Not "defending" them, just pointing out that they do lie often, just like you.

                  1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                    Yes. Defending them. I see zero criticism. You responded against someone criticizing them. Lol.

              2. Chumby   2 months ago

                Because someone does it you are ok with it?

                And that’s too bad your akita stopped respecting you.

            3. Super Scary   2 months ago

              I'm going to be bold and say no to that question. That answer may be harder for others to give.

          4. Nobartium   2 months ago

            Defamation, but don't let that stop you from coming down to the level you claim to despise.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              In order for defamation to be *actionable*, there must be some tangible material harm that is produced as a result. What harm is that at this point? As QB said, it's not exactly impugning Trump's character. It would be totally on brand for him to have written that type of letter to one of his "bros".

              1. Chuck the Sarcasm Police   2 months ago

                It would be totally on brand for him to have written that type of letter to one of his "bros".

                Cite? That "letter" is considerably distant from "grab them by the pussy".

              2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

                In order for defamation to be *actionable*, there must be some tangible material harm that is produced as a result.

                Incorrect. Look up "libel per se".

                1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                  Guess I can remind everybody jeff supported the 1.5B judgement against Alex Jones despite zero harm.

                  1. Minadin   2 months ago

                    Well, that's inconvenient, isn't it?

          5. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

            Lying Jeffy doesn’t see the big deal with the press lying. Shocking!

            1. Chumby   2 months ago

              Makes him feel better about himself. Not as much as pounding two bags of Double Stuff Oreos down his gullet in 5 minutes, but he does feel better.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (Muting Sarc like he mutes us)   2 months ago

                Which size bags? The typical ones, or the Sam’s/Costco sized ones?

        3. Kungpowderfinger   2 months ago

          LOL, I remember when WSJ ran a “Warning: The following contains adult content and may be offensive to some readers” when they published a Monica Lewinsky deposition during the Clinton’s “troubles”.

          I guess things have changed quite a bit at the WSJ, I haven’t read it in years.

          1. Chumby   2 months ago

            You suggesting the current offerings are a stain on their reputation?

          2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

            Lying Jeffy claimed the Lewinsky scandal was a smear above.

            1. Chumby   2 months ago

              It was splashed across the headlines.

            2. InsaneTrollLogic (Muting Sarc like he mutes us)   2 months ago

              I think Lying Jeffy actually believed Slick Wllie when he claimed he didn’t have sex with that woman.

          3. Sam Bankman-Fried   2 months ago

            Dear Penthouse,

            The president was about to sign a bill to make it a law and I asked him if he had a pen in his pocket or if he was just happy to see me. He asked me if I had 10 minutes for a “pocket veto”. 1996 is going to be a wild erection…I mean election.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Muting Sarc like he mutes us)   2 months ago

              You don’t need to republish your own fantasies here, Sam.

      2. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

        Damn those democracts using puberty blockers on adults?

        1. Chumby   2 months ago

          Hair raising. Oh wait.

  8. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    You've had enough, what with all the Epstein and Trump.

    NYC is the center of the universe. If that place has become too boring to talk about then all is lost.

  9. damikesc   2 months ago

    The WSJ told Leavitt they did not even HAVE the letter.

    This sounds totes legit.

    1. Chumby   2 months ago

      Is this like Dan Rather and the W Bush national guard documents?

      1. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

        The Hitler Dairies.

        They want it to be true even if they have to make it so.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          Why else go to journalism school?

          1. Chumby   2 months ago

            Food trucks and Mexican ass sex?

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

              Is that the Tuesday lunch special?

            2. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 months ago

              lalalalalalabumba...

      2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        Fake but true?

      3. Sam Bankman-Fried   2 months ago

        No, Benghazi! Lolololololol!!

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

      How many layers of anonymous hearsay does it take to get published in the WSJ?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        In 2025, to slam Trump or Musk, none.

    3. Super Scary   2 months ago

      Sure, but 30 anonymous people familiar with writing letters confirmed it was a letter. Case closed!

  10. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    I don't know what's true or false here, what's being hidden, what the Journal's sourcing is like (though they tend to be pretty careful with their reporting)...

    Unless, of course, it's a Democrat's questionable foreign business connections or obvious cognitive decline. Otherwise they're total bloodhounds for the truth.

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Is the truth masked and double-vaxxed or is it just wearing horse-paste and a plainly-visible moustache while tying little old ladies to the railroad track like Dick Dastardly?

  11. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Our long national nightmare is over.

    The Colbert Show is dying? Probably the clot shot finally got it.

    1. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

      I'm old enough to remember before the Democratic Party got behind it, when Colbert was mocking the vaccine.

      He switched narratives without even taking a breath between. He was principled like that.

      1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

        This was true of every DNC talking head back then.

        "I refuse to take the Trump poison!!!" to "If you don't take the Fauci Ouchie, you're gonna kill grandma!!!"

        Same mother fuckers.

      2. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

        What year was Colbert mocking the vaccine? When did the Democrats start supporting Colbert? If you can answer both correctly you will see the error in your statement.

        1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

          Aren't you past due for a hormone blocker?

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

            And if so, how 'bout some Jonestown Kool-aid?

        2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          What year did boars grow tits?

        3. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

          In 2012 Colbert had the second most liberal audience, only behind Madow.

          And here is a link with video of Colbert saying not to trust the Trump vaccine in July of 2020, before switching to supporting it after Biden became president.

          1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

            Don't waste facts on Molly.

            1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

              The only thing commie scum deserve is helicopter rides.

          2. Alberto Balsalm   2 months ago

            He ceased being funny when he left the Colbert report and just became a useless pundit like Fallon, Kimmel et al.

          3. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

            I didn't know Colbert was dissing the vaccine but I guess most Dems were before they weren't.

            1. Sam Bankman-Fried   2 months ago

              Except Democrats got vaccinated and Democratic and wealthy Republican populations avoided the Delta death surge. Low educated Republican populations took ivermectin and had an entirely avoidable Delta wave.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (Muting Sarc like he mutes us)   2 months ago

                Cite?

              2. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

                "the Delta death surge"

                That didn't actually exist, you retard.

        4. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

          LOL!
          https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladityaray/2025/07/18/cbss-cancellation-of-colberts-late-show-called-out-by-democrats-and-trump-critics/

        5. InsaneTrollLogic (Muting Sarc like he mutes us)   2 months ago

          Anytime prior to January 20, 2021. You’re supposed to be a PhD, retard, look it up.

        6. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

          Once again, MollyGodiva says someone is wrong, that person produces evidence to show MG is full of shit, and MG doesn't even give the smallest mea culpa.

        7. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

          2020. Duh. The same year every prominent democrat with a microphone in front of their dirty pie hole said that they would “not trust a vaccine developed under this administration.”

          But by Inauguration Day the same fucking vax was a miracle of science. 6 months later they tried to mandate it while accusing R’s of….. (and this is the really funny part, molly….) “spreading misinformation causing vaccine hesitancy”.

          Lol. Do you see why you are losing now, Dr. idiot?

  12. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'the Journal—not a particularly left-wing paper, mind you!'

    Well, not in 2025, after the latest Overton media shifts.

  13. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Eight healthy babies who have genes derived from three different parents have been born healthy in the United Kingdom...

    All of them migrants.

    1. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

      Every time they do gene editing on someone this happens. It also happens when you catch a virus.

      The amount of people who have virion "parents" is quite high.

      The only change here is to their maternally derived mtDNA lineage, which is a tiny fraction of the genes inherited from your mother.

      1. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

        And mtDNA has nothing to with your physical characteristics. Mitochrondria are considered as a type symbiotic organism.

        1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

          And if your count is high enough, you can become a Force-user.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Speaking of multi-parent migrants, are any of them from "traditional cultures" where a pregnant woman quickly sleeps around so that every guy in the village has an uncertain paternity claim?

      1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

        Where do such cultures exist?

        1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

          In every Midwestern city with an Appalachian expat community.

          1. VinniUSMC   2 months ago

            That's inbreeding. Different culture.

          2. mad.casual   2 months ago

            And yet, when the dark specters of HIV and monkey pox are visited upon these quiet little burbs, their door knocks go unanswered and there's nary a peep from the locals.

            Probably because the one pregnant woman is employing the classic prophylactic technique of manning a glory hole.

          3. Chumby   2 months ago

            When Tom Brady went to Tampa, he became an ex Pat.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Muting Sarc like he mutes us)   2 months ago

              That must have been deflating.

        2. Minadin   2 months ago

          Maury Povich.

  14. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    My sense from a million miles away is that undergraduate education has rapidly become more pre-professional...

    Extended daycare.

  15. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Someone at Fox has must've hit the emergency switch because now they're airing a Biden blunder mix...

    Remember when we all pretended it was totally normal for him to be president?

    1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

      I'll never get tired of watching him wander into the rain forest.

      1. Chumby   2 months ago

        What was he supposed to do, ride a bicycle?

  16. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'My sense from a million miles away is that undergraduate education has rapidly become more pre-professional (look at the flows into and out of comp-sci, for example, in the last few years) and much less about "reading books, getting drunk, and going to parties."'

    In other words, many people have finally realized that the original college model, where a tiny group mostly from elite families could party (and bond) with similar people and then go on to very successful lives, does not work for the rest of society. Instead, these students need practical training that leads to financial returns on time and money.

    1. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

      precisely.

      The vast majority of students in college would be far better served (along with society) with learning a trade, a craft, or frankly just skipping college and being a server/barista/whatever.

      Society needs the trades, we need skilled workers, we need the workforce. We dont need unlimited amounts of X-ethnicity-studies, critical___theory, literature, poetry, philosophy, psych majors.

      In times of old, as you said, these things would be reserved for the children of nobles, to navel gaze, wax poetic, and waste mommy and daddy's money and time, and then fall into a cush life/career involving inheriting the family business and wealth. We dont need 10,000 Jane-problem-glasses-Schmoes, with a degree in BIPOC women's studies and philosophy (fully financed by the tax payer), that has no useful function in society. This is really a societal engineering problem, and our (western) societies have collectively produced an unlimited supply of widgets that aren't functional in the assembly line in any capacity, so we make them all HR or DEI workers, and pretend we can keep this pyramid scheme going until infinity

  17. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

    I fear there will increasingly be a difference of opinion

    I think you should rejoice, 8 new children have been born into this world.

    1. VinniUSMC   2 months ago

      Only a few hundred million more to go to stop the population collapse.

      1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

        Elon is working on it.

  18. Chuck the Sarcasm Police   2 months ago

    I don't have a lot of respect for Donald Trump, but how could anyone ever seriously believe he signed his name as a cunt? The psychology of it is all wrong. The guy who posted a picture of himself eating a taco salad on Cinco de Mayo and paid to sleep with a fake-titty porn star also wrote an enigmatic love note to Epstein?

    Seriously, this is as bad as the pee tapes. I suspect it is meant to be so degrading as to incite the President into illegal action to suppress it. They so badly want him to punish them to kick off the revolution.

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      Trump's been 'under investigation' for anything from littering to murder for at least 10 years now by every prosecutor holding office in the US, and NOW we're to believe this 'revelation'?!
      TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!
      Seems being a TDS-addled lying pile of slimy shit is a requirement for being a Reason employee.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic (Muting Sarc like he mutes us)   2 months ago

      Essentially, in wanting him to kick off the revolution, they’re looking for plausible deniability and the moral high ground. Problem for them is that they lack any morals whatsoever and have no plausible deniability.

  19. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'Someone at Fox has must’ve hit the emergency switch because now they’re airing a Biden blunder mix'

    Would you rather they wait until Joe's funeral?

    1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

      Five years too late?

    2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

      Would you rather they wait until Joe's funeral?

      No. That will be the time for the "Biden finally did something I like" clip.

  20. Chumby   2 months ago

    A diddle, wrapped in a Mister E, inside an enema.

  21. Longtobefree   2 months ago

    "I don't know what's true or false here, what's being hidden, what the Journal's sourcing is like (though they tend to be pretty careful with their reporting . . . "

    Which is why the "report" has multiple named, verifiable, reliable sources, and they have the letter?

    Russia 2.0 (or 7.6 or something)

  22. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    Has the WSJ written about Ashley Biden's diary and the showers therein? Why not?

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      DON'T believe her!

    2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      The FBI was put on the case to squash that release. They may have used unmarked vans too.

      1. Chupacabra   2 months ago

        But they did they wear masks?!?

        1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          Masks get wet in the shower.

          1. Chumby   2 months ago

            But tranny women with axewounds can’t.

  23. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    Prosecutor in Diddy and Epstein cases fired by US justice department
    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdjxkkpgn1ko

    The US Department of Justice has fired a federal prosecutor who worked on the cases against sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, and hip hop mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs.

    It is not clear why Maurene Comey was removed from her job at the Southern District of New York. But a day after she was fired, Comey told former colleagues that "fear is the tool of a tyrant, wielded to supress independent thought".

    She is the daughter of former FBI Director James Comey, who was fired by President Donald Trump in 2017....

    1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      More recent reporting states she is the one who sent the affidavit to the judge to continue hiding all epstein material on a judicial block. Court orders to not release "due to appeals."

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Muting Sarc like he mutes us)   2 months ago

        Given all that, I can’t even begin to imagine why she would be fired. Maybe it’s her total incompetence, maybe it’s that she got the job through nepotism, or maybe that she’s a malicious bitch protecting a pedophile. Maybe it’s all of the above and more.

    2. Moonrocks   2 months ago

      How did she coincidentally get assigned to all three of those cases?

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Muting Sarc like he mutes us)   2 months ago

        (D)ifferent reasons.

  24. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    'Well trained' at what? I thought they were devoting their lives to Doing Good Things and Helping Others.

    https://notthebee.com/article/federal-employees-admit-to-staging-international-color-revolutions-and-discuss-plans-for-a-us-version

    ‘Take it from those of us who worked in authoritarian countries: We've become one,' said a currently employed federal official, who spoke to NOTUS on condition of anonymity. ‘They were so quick to disband AID, the group that supposedly instigates color revolutions. But they've done a very foolish thing. You just released a bunch of well-trained individuals into your population. If you kept our offices going and had us play solitaire in the office, it might have been safer to keep your regime.'

    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      If you kept our offices going and had us play solitaire in the office, it might have been safer to keep your regime.

      Extortion threat, but not very scary.

      Ever read Unintended Consequences?

      I can tell the USAID fools never did.

    2. Super Scary   2 months ago

      Trump better watch out! They'll sow discord from the drive-in window at Burger King.

  25. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    The leopard ate her face.

    A Pride flag ban sparks accusations of betrayal in tiny Michigan city
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/09/16/hamtramck-michigan-pride-flag-ban/

    HAMTRAMCK, Mich. — This city of 28,000 was once so Polish it was dubbed “Little Warsaw.” But in recent decades, an influx of immigrants gave Hamtramck a new character. Bengali and Arabic joined English on signs at City Hall. Yemeni and Bangladeshi mosques, restaurants and shops proliferated....

    ...Yet the ethnic, cultural and religious diversity that made Hamtramck something of a model is being put severely to the test. In June, after divisive debate, the six-member council blocked the display of Pride flags on city property — action that has angered allies and members of the LGBTQ+ community, who say that the support they provided the immigrant groups has been reciprocated with betrayal.

    “We welcomed you,” former council member Catrina Stackpoole, a retired social worker who identifies as gay, recalls telling the council this summer. “We created nonprofits to help feed, clothe, find housing. We did everything we could to make your transition here easier, and this is how you repay us, by stabbing us in the back?”

    1. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

      They have control. They no longer need the Stackpoles anymore.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Turns out the Caliphate does not support DEI.

      2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

        You can't spend your whole life worrying about your mistakes! You fucked up... you trusted us!

    2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      The Useful Idiots never figure out that they're always the first against the wall.

  26. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    Alone and Exploited, Migrant Children Work Brutal Jobs Across the U.S.
    Arriving in record numbers, they’re ending up in dangerous jobs that violate child labor laws — including in factories that make products for well-known brands like Cheetos and Fruit of the Loom.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/25/us/unaccompanied-migrant-child-workers-exploitation.html

    ...Unlike the foster care system, in which all children get case management, H.H.S. provides this service to about a third of children who pass through its care, and usually for just four months. Tens of thousands of other children are sent to their sponsors with little but the phone number for a national hotline. From there, they are often on their own: There is no formal follow-up from any federal or local agencies to ensure that sponsors are not putting children to work illegally.

    In Pennsylvania, one case worker told The Times he went to check on a child released to a man who had applied to sponsor 20 other minors. The boy had vanished. In Texas, another case worker said she had encountered a man who had been targeting poor families in Guatemala, promising to help them get rich if they sent their children across the border. He had sponsored 13 children.

    “If you’ve been in this field for any amount of time, you know that there’s what the sponsors agree to, and what they’re actually doing,” said Bernal Cruz Munoz, a caseworker supervisor in Oregon.

    1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      Jeffsarc loves child labor and child rape.

      Citation same as the WSJ story. Except have links to their comments.

      1. Chupacabra   2 months ago

        As long as the rapist feels bad about it afterwards, it's totally fine.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          But we need migrant kids to do the sex work that American kids refuse to do!

        2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

          And at least some of the fellow gang rapists just jackoff on the victim, so that's alright, too, because "their culture" or something.

      2. Chuck the Sarcasm Police   2 months ago

        Quicktown Brix (MikeGTP), is up for defending child slavery as well. Yesterday he compared the illegal kids liberated from the CA pot farm to kids on US family owned farms. Claimed to have worked on a dairy farm and wished he had been able to work on a pot farm.

        We need higher quality trolls. Never thought I would wax nostalgic for arguing Michael Hihn on the 2nd amendment. RIGHTS IN CONFLICT

        1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          Well Mike is a leftist retard. California even bars people under age from doing anything with pot.

        2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          Oh LOL. The only people around here who defend child slavery, or at least willing to turn a blind eye to it, are the closed-border crowd. Because, for the most part, they are fine with crimes against children, as long as they are foreign children and the crimes are occurring somewhere else, not America.

          1. Chuck the Sarcasm Police   2 months ago

            What the fuck are you going on about? That makes zero sense. The exploitation of the kids was happening in CA.

            You know what is about the only thing the US can do about foreign child labor short of waging war? Put tariffs on those countries.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              The exploitation of the kids was happening in CA.

              What is your team's preferred solution? Deport them. To places where they are even more likely to be exploited.

              You know what is about the only thing the US can do about foreign child labor short of waging war? Put tariffs on those countries.

              No, there is also this concept called "amnesty" which your team now rejects.

              1. VinniUSMC   2 months ago

                Good old reliable jeffsarc. Keeps getting more retarded. Every day, I think "he must have hit the bottom by now". Every day, you prove me wrong.

                1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                  Jeff is a bottom? Does his akita know?

                  1. InsaneTrollLogic (Muting Sarc like he mutes us)   2 months ago

                    So who’s the top? It sure as fuck isn’t Sarc.

                2. Chuck the Sarcasm Police   2 months ago

                  I mean, holy fuck, Jeffy's argument is "better to exploit them here." What effect could amnesty have on child labor in another country?

              2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

                “Deport them. To places where they are even more likely to be exploited.”

                Lol. Careful, jeff. You’re getting dangerously close to suggesting that we do in fact have a “superior” culture in America.

                Why would we import people who are “more likely to exploit” children ?

                What the fuck is wrong with you?

            2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

              You know what is about the only thing the US can do about foreign child labor short of waging war

              How about arresting them and deporting them to shit hole countries where I'm sure there's no child labor?

              1. Chuck the Sarcasm Police   2 months ago

                Your reading comprehension is as bad as Jeffy.

                You can't deport "foreign child labor". It is perfectly clear from the context that I was referring to children laboring outside our borders, which is why a war would have to be waged to stop it.

                Be better.

                1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                  My mistake.

        3. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          Hi everyone. Meet my shadow, Chuck.

          We need higher quality trolls.

          I need a higher quality troll, that's for sure. Chuckie lives up my ass these days.

          Here's the context of the exchange yesterday, since Chuck skipped it to make it seem as bad as possible and missed the joke. Judge for yourself if I defended slavery or was taken out of context.

          https://reason.com/2025/07/17/death-to-big-bird/?comments=true#comment-11130177

          1. Chuck the Sarcasm Police   2 months ago

            Hi everyone. Meet my shadow, Chuck.

            Calling you out for continuing to be a cunt is not the loving affection you pretend it is.

            Chuck skipped it to make it seem as bad as possible and missed the joke.

            What joke? The context is your comments "If a minor has a job they are a slave?" and "I assume they agree to a fee for service".

            Seriously where is the fucking joke? Kids on a family farm get to go to school and have chores. Comparing that to forced labor with no compensation is fucking evil.

            1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

              Newsflash: some minors do labor for money. What kind of sheltered adolescence did you have?

              Calling you out for continuing to be a cunt is not the loving affection you pretend it is.

              Awwe.... You do protest too much!

              What joke?

              I can't school a humorless dried up mothball on how to find a joke. Maybe get the stick out of your ass for starters.

              Kids on a family farm get to go to school and have chores.

              Ever been to Amish country?

              Do these kids go to school? Are they being paid? Are they with their family? How many hours per day do they work? How old are they?You don't know any of that. You jump to conclusions then get huffy and puffy at me for questioning those assumptions. Then you come back with assumptions about me. Have some humility. You're not nearly as smart as you think you are.

              Comparing that to forced labor with no compensation is fucking evil.

              Mind that stick.

              1. Chuck the Sarcasm Police   2 months ago

                Keep digging, dude.

                1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                  This reminds me of the Beatles classic, No Reply.

    2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      Are we talking about actual children here, or 25-year-olds?

  27. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    MBE for man who led Muslim police boycott after grooming scandal
    https://anglicanmainstream.org/article/mbe-for-man-who-led-muslim-police-boycott-after-grooming-scandal/

    A man who led a Muslim community boycott of South Yorkshire police after the Rotherham grooming scandal has been awarded an MBE for “services to integration” and “cohesion”.

    Muhbeen Hussain called on Muslims to sever ties with the force and “take all the necessary action to protect ourselves” in October 2015, the year after the force’s failure to investigate thousands of allegations of abuse and rape had been exposed.

    His campaign group warned: “Any Muslim groups or institutions in Rotherham that do not adhere to this policy of disengagement will also be boycotted by the Muslim community.”

    1. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

      https://rightofcentre.uk/2025/07/08/sadiq-khans-silence-on-grooming-gangs-unfit-for-mayor-unworthy-of-knighthood/

      London Mayor Sadiq Khan, knighted in 2024 for “political and public service,” has once again shown why he’s unfit to lead our capital. In a January 2025 Mayor’s Question Time, Conservative Assembly Member Susan Hall pressed Khan nine times on whether London has a grooming gang problem akin to the horrors of Rotherham. His response? A shameful dodge, repeatedly asking Hall to define “grooming gangs” as if he’s clueless about the rape and trafficking of young girls by organised predators. This isn’t ignorance—it’s a calculated refusal to confront a scandal that risks alienating his core voter base, particularly British-Pakistani Muslims. Khan’s silence, as TalkTV’s Alex Phillips rightly blasted recently, is a “disgusting disservice” to victims and proof he’s neither suited to be Mayor nor deserving of a knighthood.

      Dodging the Truth to Protect Votes
      Khan’s performance at City Hall was a masterclass in evasion. When Hall referenced grooming gangs targeting young girls for sexual exploitation, Khan pivoted to “county lines” drug gangs or feigned confusion, demanding Hall clarify her terms. This wasn’t a quest for clarity—it was a trap to push Hall into mentioning ethnicity, letting Khan cry “Islamophobia” and dodge accountability. As Phillips fumed, he’s “trying to pull the race card” to shield himself from scrutiny. Why? Because Khan’s electoral success hinges on areas like Tower Hamlets, where he won 85% of the vote in 2021, bolstered by strong British-Pakistani support. Admitting grooming gangs exist, especially their ethnic profile, could fracture this base. So, Khan stonewalls, leaving victims—mostly vulnerable white working-class girls—in the dust.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        The UK is well and truly fucked.

        1. tracerv   2 months ago

          100%. They have truly been invaded and defeated. They should not make fun of the French anymore.

  28. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    Crazy golf trips, circus tickets and countless Amazon parcels: How cash-strapped councils are handing out gift cards and fun days to asylum seekers using taxpayer money
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14900141/councils-asylum-seekers-gift-cards-Amazon-crazy-golf.html

  29. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/covid-deaths-caused-infections-ventilators-pushed-feds-new-york-icu

    Bacterial infections associated with ventilators may have caused most of the deaths attributed to COVID-19 among intubated patients, according to a study funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases that reinforces ongoing scrutiny of early treatment protocols and official COVID death figures.

    The findings could help explain why New York City, where ventilators were heavily used early in the pandemic, experienced a dramatic spike in COVID mortality even among non-elderly people that wasn't seen in areas with similar demographics and climate.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

      They literally executed old people and they knew exactly what they were doing.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Hey, just trying to make Social Security solvent.

    2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      Man. Almost like many of us noted the high sepsis rate and said just this almost immediately after deaths began climbing...

      1. Chumby   2 months ago

        Died with sepsis

      2. mad.casual   2 months ago

        Once again, remember the planet-sized mountain of sheer scientific contextual BS going around too?

        People were talking about cytokine storm and TCID50 (50% lethality of tissue-culture infective doses) per liter of air.

        Every one of these MDs, PhDs, Biologists and similar should be asked to hold up their degrees in front of their faces and then punched.

  30. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/07/14/we-know-who-controlled-the-biden-autopenand-this-scandal-just-got-worse-n2660317

    Jeff Zients, the guy who pardoned Fauci, was the main social media censorship coordinator using the power of the White House to threaten Big Tech companies if they didn’t censor US citizens who questioned the Biden admin’s Covid policies.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Did he give himself the Medal of Freedom?

  31. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    Jill Biden Aid Pleads 5th: Refuses To Answer Questions On Autopen Scandal
    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/jill-biden-aid-pleads-5th-refuses-answer-questions-autopen-scandal

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      The Doctor is Out.

  32. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    https://freespeechunion.org/shopped-stewards-why-todays-trade-unions-police-speech-instead-of-protecting-workers-and-how-to-fix-it/

    How did trade unions go from defending their members’ right to free speech to encouraging their employers to discipline them for breaching workplace speech codes?

    Historically, trade unions championed the principle that ‘an injury to one is an injury to all’, standing in solidarity with workers against bosses. But at the Free Speech Union we’ve seen any number of cases that prove just how historical this is.

    Nowadays, workers under disciplinary investigation for dissenting from progressive orthodoxies to be supported by their unions, particularly on sex and gender issues. In fact, it’s often worse than that, with the unions themselves encouraging employers to discipline their members for breaching workplace speech codes.

  33. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    Gabriel Quadri: “Mexico is a totalitarian regime”
    https://www.public.news/p/gabriel-quadri-mexico-is-a-totalitarian

    Imagine a nation where people are required “to apologize daily during one month” on X for thought crimes; where your name can be entered “in a public registry of people that are aggressive against women” for insisting upon the biological reality of sex; and where the state is implementing digital ID along with “facial recognition systems” and “a new law for regulation of social media.”

  34. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    Unearthed chat sheds light on cozy ties between judges, climate activists, raising ethical concerns
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/unearthed-chat-sheds-light-cozy-183817643.html

    An environmental advocacy group accused of trying to manipulate judges organized a years-long, nationwide online forum with jurists to promote favorable info and litigation updates regarding climate issues – until the email-styled group chat was abruptly made private, Fox News Digital found.

    The Climate Judiciary Project (CJP) was founded in 2018 by a left-wing environmental nonprofit, the Environmental Law Institute (ELI), and pitches itself as a "first-of-its-kind effort" that "provides judges with authoritative, objective, and trusted education on climate science, the impacts of climate change, and the ways climate science is arising in the law."

    ...Fox News Digital obtained the archived chat history of the forum, which detailed numerous messages between at least five judges and CJP employees trading links on climate studies, congratulating one another on hosting recent environmental events, sharing updates on recent climate cases that were remanded to state courts, and encouraging each other to participate in other CJP meet-ups.

    One message posted by Delaware Judge Travis Laster, vice chancellor of the Delaware Court of Chancery, features a YouTube video of a 2022 climate presentation delivered by a Delaware official and a Columbia University professor that focused on the onslaught of climate lawsuits since the mid-2000s. It also included claims that such lawsuits could one day bankrupt the fuel industry.

    Laster shared the video in the group with a disclaimer to others: "Because the link is of a judicial event that is otherwise not public, please do not forward or use without checking with me. I suspect that goes without saying, but the powers that be will be happier that I said it."

  35. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/10211443-it-is-simply-no-longer-possible-to-believe-much-of

    “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.”

  36. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    Posobiec's response was the best: "It's totally false, but even if it's true, so what?"

  37. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    Oh and here we have Ra's Al Gore doing his part to "push the panic button" and bring in all of these tangential stories to deflect from the Trump-Epstein connection. Good job! I am sure you will get a nice pat on the head from Team Red.

    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      What happened to - "It's totally false, but even if it's true, so what?"

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        You'll have to ask Posobiec about that.

        1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

          chemjeff radical individualist 25 minutes ago
          Posobiec's response was the best: "It's totally false, but even if it's true, so what?

          You are the one who claimed it was the best, then flipped like DNC supporter. But I repeat myself.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            Well gee, sorry if I left off my /sarc tag. I believe his is the "best" because of how hypocritical and two-faced it is. He wants to have it both ways: try to claim that it is both false, and also not a big deal even if true.

            But I think you knew that, and you are just being especially defensive today. Is having to defend Dear Leader Trump giving you the sadz?

            1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

              How would it be a “big deal” if true?

    2. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

      Yep, one questionable letter is the only news that is happening anywhere on the planet.

      Funny thing is, at this point, any real evidence against Trump will be dismissed as fake on the grounds of "given how much the political establishment wanted him gone and how far they will go to do it, anything real would have come out a long time ago".

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        YOU will dismiss ALL evidence against Trump as fake no matter what it is and how valid and truthful it is. And it is your job to keep it that way by enforcing party messaging. When it's a bad news day for Trump, deflect and distract by posting years-old stories about trannies behaving badly, or something.

        1. VinniUSMC   2 months ago

          You consider all rumors against Trump as true, no matter what it is, and regardless of whether there is any validity or truth or verifiability to it. So, um, yes, excuse us while we don't just believe fatass lying jeffsarc.

    3. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

      So weird, almost like RA Gore posts links like this all the time.

      1. VinniUSMC   2 months ago

        Nuh-uh, this time it's (D)ifferent! -pedojeffy

  38. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

    This obsession with Epstein is stupid, like with most of the conspiracies the MAGAs latch onto.

    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      While I realize transitioning must be difficult, I need to point out that EVERYONE wanted the E list after his "suicide". You revisionists are getting quite old, even when your sexual preferences do not.

    2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      Sort of like your fantasy of being other than a lying pile of slimy lefty shit?

    3. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      Hey doc retard... it is largely democrats demanding the release. See the two amendments they tried to push a few days ago dumdum.

    4. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      It IS stupid. But it is also fitting justice. Team Red has derived a lot of mileage about stoking popular anger and resentment based on FEELINGS instead of reality. This is just the chickens coming home to roost. Manipulation of public anger to obtain power only goes so far.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Sure, Jeffy. But they have a LONG way to go to catch up to the party that pioneered feelings and "lived experience" as replacement for logic and objectivity. You know, getting rid of "white culture".

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          Not really true. Team Red has for a long time believed in feelings over reality. They just lied to themselves a lot to justify it. Take their constant insistence that they are "Constitutional conservatives". Yet when you ask them about individual topics that the Constitution explicitly permits or forbids - religion in public schools, counting all residents for the census, their idiotic claim that peaceful migration is equivalent to the 18th century concept of INVASION - what they really mean is "the Constitution that is in their heads". Heck the people who are the first ones to shout how much they "love America" tend to be the ones who will deny the Declaration of Independent's claim that "all men are created equal and endowed with certain inalienable rights", when they want to deny rights to the dirty filthy illegals. The entire reason for their conservatism derives from their stirring feelings of patriotism and national pride. Not from some logical deduction or from reading John Locke. It's been that way for a long time, way before Trump.

    5. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Hey Molly--shouting "Conspiracy!" now has as much affect, outside of the college faculty lounge and LGBTQXYZ123 cell meeting, as shouting "Racist!". Zero.

  39. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    That story out of LA about an old woman kidnapped by ICE... yeap. Totally fake.

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mexican-woman-us-illegally-charged-faking-her-own-ice-kidnapping

    1. Chumby   2 months ago

      ¡Ay caramba!

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        As AOC would say? Or Sotomayor?

    2. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

      Is that one of them big booty Latinas?

  40. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    End Wokeness
    @EndWokeness
    Zohran Mamdani says he'd be in favor of the "abolition of private property"

    PolitFact: not a communist.

    1. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

      Mamdani is God's gift to the GOP for 2026 and 2028. Vance is going to make him the face of the Dems in 2028, assuming Mamdani isn't their nominee.

    2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      Oh, so he has a lot in common with MAGA who considers the entire nation to be 'public property' for purposes of immigration enforcement.

      1. VinniUSMC   2 months ago

        The only times jeffsarc cares about private property: to silence critics, and to invite cheap labor and undocumented children.

      2. Chumby   2 months ago

        And age of consent laws too. Those dastardly MAGA people.

  41. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    One of my favorite new talking points from open borders idiots is they should be going after employers not illegals. They have been the entire time. Wonder what the next talking point is.

    Nick Sortor
    @nicksortor
    BREAKING: The Trump admin has ARRESTED a Subway restauranteur for mass IMMIGRATION FRAUD

    The owner, Chandrakant Patel, helped HUNDREDS of Indians illegally receive visas by paying cops $5K for fake police reports, making the alien eligible for visas reserved for victims of crimes.

    Track down every single one of those illegitimate visa holders and SEND THEM BACK!

  42. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    UK goes full California.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/07/17/police-abandoning-shoplifting-as-a-crime/

    Talking about illegals is still a crime though.

    1. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

      We're abolishing private property.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Then zero property crime, right?

        Except, of course, claiming something as "yours".

    2. Chumby   2 months ago

      Gape Britain

  43. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    Eric Daugherty
    @EricLDaugh
    BREAKING: Democratic Party plummets to a whopping 19% APPROVAL rating, per Quinnipiac

    -53.

    19%-72%.

    Holy smokes.

    1. Chumby   2 months ago

      Then downward trend began when akitas stopped respecting them.

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        When you've lost the respect of akitas...

        1. Chumby   2 months ago

          Team D is bottoming out for sure. And that doesn’t poll well with the akitas.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (Muting Sarc like he mutes us)   2 months ago

            Does Chase Oliver know that Team D is a bottom?

            1. Chumby   2 months ago

              Sarc does and frequently is welcoming new members.

  44. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    Poor jeffsarc.

    https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/arkansas-wins-case-ban-critical-race-theory-schools

  45. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    "Urban League declares a ‘state of emergency’ for civil rights in the US in response to Trump"
    [...]
    "WASHINGTON (AP) — One of the nation’s oldest civil rights organizations on Thursday declared a “state of emergency” for antidiscrimination policies, personal freedoms and Black economic advancement in response to President Donald Trump ‘s upending of civil rights precedents and the federal agencies traditionally tasked with enforcing them..."
    https://apnews.com/article/urban-league-civil-rights-emergency-trump-74b79d4dba14a37d487f0504feb066cc

    My bet's on an 'emergency' in their funding, starting with the taxpayer money they were formerly handed for their racist bullshit.

    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      Says the black guy whose annual salary is $1,284,284.00.

      Sounds oppressed AF.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      But what are they gonna do with all the Uncle Toms who voted for Trump?

  46. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Scenes from NY:

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/mamdani-sparks-firestorm-with-resurfaced-comment-on-abolishing-private-property-he-s-a-communist/ar-AA1INEc1

    Zohran Mamdani's past comments are once again coming back to haunt his New York City mayoral campaign, as a resurfaced video reveals the socialist candidate floated the "abolition of private property."

    "My platform is that every single person should have housing, and I think faced with these two options, the system has hundreds of thousands of people unhoused, right? For what?" Mamdani questioned in a resurfaced video that has been clipped and reposted across conservative social media.

    "If there was any system that could guarantee each person housing, whether you call it the abolition of private property or you call it, you know, just a statewide housing guarantee, it is preferable to what is going on right now," Mamdani said.

    "People try and play like gotcha games about these kinds of things, and it's like, look, I care more about whether somebody has a home," he said.

    1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      Not a communist- politifact.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        That's what their communist girlfriends would tell them to say.

    2. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

      If you make them stop taking heroin or take their schizophrenia meds to get their 'free' housing, they won't go. If you don't, they destroy that property and terrorize the other 'unhoused'.

  47. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Just plain corruption, not deep state immigration conspiracy.

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/07/17/louisiana-police-chiefs-charged-visa-fraud-bribery/85254161007/

    A group of Louisiana police chiefs, a marshal and a Subway shop operator worked together for nearly a decade to create fake police reports so "hundreds" of people could apply for visas designed for victims of crime, officials alleged in an indictment.

    The law enforcement officials and shop operator, who also owns local convenience stores, were charged with 62 counts in a federal grand jury indictment revealed on July 16. The charges include conspiracy, immigration fraud, robbery, mail fraud and money laundering, Acting United States Attorney for the Western District of Louisiana Alexander C. Van Hook said. The five alleged co-conspirators were arrested on July 15 without incident, he said.

    Since at least late 2015, people seeking the so-called "U visas" would pay Chandrakant "Lala" Patel, the Subway operator and convenience store owner, thousands of dollars to help them fraudulently obtain status in the United States, Van Hook said. Patel would then pay the law enforcement officials to name them in fake police reports stating that they were victims of armed robberies so that they would qualify for the visas, Van Hook said.

    "We expect law enforcement officers to protect the public and to honor their trust, not to sell that trust and the honor of their badges for personal gain," Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's New Orleans office Jonathan Tapp said.

    Van Hook said that while the defendants involved in law enforcement were corrupt, the public has no reason to be concerned about the remaining law enforcement officers in their communities.

    "We are not alleging that these are corrupt police departments," Van Hook said.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (Muting Sarc like he mutes us)   2 months ago

      How many of these fake visa holders are driving semis?

  48. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Media's Illegal alien sob story, with a new twist...

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/undocumented-woman-staged-fake-ice-kidnapping-to-generate-sympathy-and-donations-doj-claims/ar-AA1IOgpA

    An undocumented woman faked her own kidnapping and blamed it on Immigration and Customs Enforcement to generate sympathy and donations, the Justice Department has claimed.

    The DOJ said in a press release Thursday Yuriana Julia Pelaez Calderon, a 41-year-old from Los Angeles, was taken into ICE custody and charged with conspiracy and making false statements to federal officers.

    The case comes amid criticism of President Donald Trump’s mass immigration deportation efforts, which have brought a spike in immigration raids across the country.

    Federal prosecutors claimed, citing court documents filed Wednesday, that an attorney representing Calderon’s family held a press conference on June 30 saying the woman was kidnapped five days earlier in the parking lot of a fast food restaurant in Los Angeles.

    The lawyer claimed she was brought to San Ysidro near the southern border, where “she was presented to [a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement] staffer” and “presented with voluntary self-deportation paperwork,” prosecutors said.

    When Calderon refused to sign the papers and demanded to speak to a judge and a lawyer, “she was punished” and sent to a warehouse in an undisclosed location, the attorney claimed, according to prosecutors.

    A GoFundMe page with a fundraising goal of $4,500 was set up by Calderon’s daughter, who claimed her mother “was taken by masked men in an unmarked vehicle…when she was on her way to work,” according to the DOJ’s press release.

    1. Chuck the Sarcasm Police   2 months ago

      Migrants who stay are grifters. It used to be different when they came to work the fields and went home.

    2. Super Scary   2 months ago

      Wow, $4500? How close did they get?
      "When The Independent reached out to GoFundMe about the $80 raised on Calderon’s behalf"
      Pffffffft!

      1. mad.casual   2 months ago

        Beats the shit out of a hank of rope, a subway sandwich, and a hoax publicity stunt *at cost*.

    3. Minadin   2 months ago

      "a 41-year-old from Los Angeles"

      1. She's from Mexico.
      2. She looks like she's 61, yikes.

  49. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Racist, xenophobic Mexicans still failing to realize that there are no downsides to unchecked immigration of people who refuse to assimilate.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexico-city-s-plan-to-tackle-gentrification-after-angry-protests-against-overtourism/ar-AA1ILy9g

    During the protest, some people marched with signs reading “Gringo: Stop stealing our home” and “Housing regulations now!”

    The Mexico City Anti-Gentrification Front, one of the organizations behind the protest, said it was “completely against” any acts of physical violence and denied that the protests were xenophobic. Instead, the organization said the protest was a result of years of failures by the local government to address the root of the problems.

    1. Super Scary   2 months ago

      "“Gringo: Stop stealing our home”"
      Everytime I hear "gringo" I can't help but think of the local Mexican restaurant where I grew up and it had a "gringo menu" on the back of the regular menu that had hamburgers and spaghetti.

  50. VinniUSMC   2 months ago

    Trump appears all over Epstein's flight logs, indicating he took trips with him on his private jet: Trump's name appears four times in 1993, once in 1994, once in 1995, and once in 1997.

    Dumb, naive(?) Liz: "Trump appears ALL OVER the flight logs!!"
    Me: "Trump was constantly flying with Epstein to his island?"
    Lizzie: "Ummm, no. It was 4 times, with his family, and never to the island."
    Me: "Oh, so you're a liar. Ok."

    Bad Liz.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Yup. Too bad.

    2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      Yes we know, obviously hyperbolic statements like "all over" are to be taken exactly literally, whenever it is about mean things said about Trump.

      But you know, Trump can say whatever hyperbolic or exaggerated crap that he wants and everyone else has TDS for pointing it out. Got it.

      1. VinniUSMC   2 months ago

        "Anything is ok if it's mean to Trump!"

        Thanks for your insightful input, pedojeffy.

      2. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

        Wouldn't this be "whataboutism," which you were crying about earlier in the comment section for the roundup?

    3. mad.casual   2 months ago

      My understanding was also that for some or all of the trips, Epstein wasn't present. There's stronger evidence that Kato Kaelin murdered Nicole. Almost on par with the "No, but I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night!" commercials.

  51. Truthteller1   2 months ago

    It's fake, but that doesn't matter to the regime bootlickers and mentally ill democrats.

  52. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    https://x.com/nataliegwinters/status/1946199099688026576

    Wow, the
    @WSJ
    reporter behind the Trump-Epstein story was conveniently behind bogus Stormy Daniels reporting too.

    He was credited for “helping set in motion the first criminal prosecution of a former president” by
    @NYMag
    .

    1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      And connections to the Steele Dossier.

      1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

        Who would have imagined?

  53. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

    Well I have to say the WSJ story explains a lot about Trump's recent strange tweets. It's obvious now that he knew that this was coming and he sees it as yet another attempt to derail his agenda with a fake news hoax. The problem is the rest of us didn't know anything about this until yesterday. I personally have never thought Trump had any nefarious connection to Epstein or that he had any interest in underage girls. But there's a lot more to the Epstein story that we still don't know and we deserve transparency. Looks like Trump may have finally figured that out by telling Bondi to release the grand jury docs if possible. That won't be the end of the story either but it's a step in the right direction. Have to say overall this was very poorly handled with a lot of unforced errors that the Democrats are predictably exploiting. Of course it will all be forgotten in a week.

  54. JFree   2 months ago

    I fear there will increasingly be a difference of opinion between libertarians of faith, like myself, who are concerned about what we lose or destroy when humans play God

    As opposed to libertarians of faith, like yourself, who are totally ok when humans play God as long as they are merely headshotting children in Gaza.

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      Fuck off and die, Nazi scum.

    2. Chuck the Sarcasm Police   2 months ago

      headshotting children in Gaza

      There was a time that I did not consider you the worst of the Jeffys. What happened to you?

  55. mad.casual   2 months ago

    I fear there will increasingly be a difference of opinion between libertarians of faith, like myself, who are concerned about what we lose or destroy when humans play God, and libertarians who greet assisted reproductive technology developments as progress to be welcomed, and who cheer our increasing ability to master and control our biological limitations.

    I would add or differentiate a third group of people who cheer others' ability to master biology without mastering their own, but that would put me at odds with feminist, pro-abortion, single cat ladies.

  56. 5Arete22   2 months ago

    Trump's using the word enigma: https://x.com/Thiss_Youu/status/1946049530492748214

    Article on the subject: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nj.com/politics/2025/07/magas-defense-of-trump-over-1-word-is-immediately-debunked.html%3foutputType=amp

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      New TDS-addled slimy pile of shit, or sock?

      1. 5Arete22   2 months ago

        Sevo,

        "Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period."

        Are you paying for the privilege of posting?

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

          We're all grandfathered. Where did you come from?

  57. This Is The Zodiac Speaking   2 months ago

    They are really trying to bleed the freak. Talk about wallowing in a sea of sorrow

  58. Azathoth!!   2 months ago

    I do find it extremely implausible, though, that you can be friends with someone for decades, and travel with them on their private jet

    I have no idea of the details of most of my friends sex lives. I know they HAVE sex lives, but am not privy to the details.

    This is generally the norm.

    1. Chumby   2 months ago

      There was a story about a homosexual bottom whose akita didn’t even know his owner took cock in the ass until the akita saw it with his own eyes.

    2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      Beyond that, the world is full of psychopaths who engage in horrible behaviors while passing as normal to the people who know them. It's not unusual for serial killers to lead outwardly normal lives for decades. Maintaining a hidden side of oneself doesn't appear to be so difficult.

  59. charliehall   2 months ago

    Trump suing WSJ is the only way we are ever going to see the actual Epstein documents because Trump would be forced to provide them. I can't believe that his lawyers would be so stupid as to tell him to sue.

    1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      If there were anything on Trump in the Epstein files, I'm pretty sure they would have been leaked by now as a righteous action in the name of saving democracy. Biden admin had them in their hands for years and NOTHING.

    2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      He's suing them about a birthday card dumbass.

  60. JohnZ   2 months ago

    Give it some time and trump will begin to crack up. The pressure is enormous, unlike anything he's ever had to deal with and it's getting to him. Let's see if he makes it to September.
    His personality type suggest that if he can't control the message, and the situation, he will blow. He's already showing signs.
    Everybody needs to prepare for what's coming.
    Possible a total collapse of the Federal government and many state governments.
    When the SHTF be ready

    1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      They're not sending their best.

    2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      That's just silly. We just went through a President becoming incompetent in office and the sky did not fall. If Trump "cracks up", he'll be replaced, either behind the scenes as with Biden, or through the Constitutional processes that would put Vance in charge. His incapacity would not cause the government to collapse.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

House Republicans Just Voted To Give Even More Tariff Power Away to Trump

Jack Nicastro | 9.17.2025 4:00 PM

Jonathan Haidt: Kids Should Put Down the Phones and Take More Risks

John Stossel | 9.17.2025 2:40 PM

Trump's $15 Billion Lawsuit Against The New York Times Is His Craziest One Yet

Joe Lancaster | 9.17.2025 2:25 PM

'The Free Market Is Handling It Just Fine': How Left and Right Responded to Charlie Kirk's Murder

Robby Soave | 9.17.2025 12:45 PM

Parents Still Lose Kids to Discredited 'Shaken Baby' Claims

Lenore Skenazy | 9.17.2025 12:25 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300