In Just 1 Year, 134 Lifeguards Cost Los Angeles Taxpayers $70 Million
The highest earner received a grand total of $523,351.

Summertime means hitting the beach and enjoying the open ocean. For taxpayers in Los Angeles County, these activities incur a substantial financial cost.
Recent reporting from Open the Books, a watchdog group, found that total compensation for 134 of the county's 1,500 lifeguards reached $70.8 million in 2024. Of this total, 34 earned $300,000 or more in their compensation package. Lifeguard Chief Fernando Boiteux was the top earner, receiving $523,351 in total compensation.
These numbers are a significant increase from 2021, when Open the Books "found 98 lifeguards earned at least $200,000 including benefits."
While base pay, time off, and health care benefits factor into these high costs, overtime pay is a major contributor to a lifeguard's compensation package. Open the Books found that 45 lifeguards "collected between $50,000 and $171,000" in overtime payments alone. The top overtime earner was Remy Smith, who received $171,000 in overtime and earned $468,556 in total compensation. All told, taxpayers have doled $4,782,570 to L.A.'s top overtime-earning lifeguards since 2020.
Lifeguards are also provided with a generous pension plan, which allows them to retire after 30 years and receive more than 70 percent of their annual pay.
The county's lifeguards earn significantly more than lifeguards in other coastal cities. In Miami Beach, the average lifeguard earns $65,471 annually, and the highest reported salary is only $96,291—and this rate is still 1,618 percent higher than the national average.
The county's ocean lifeguards also earn more than other lifeguards in the area. Lake and pool lifeguards, employed by the city's Parks and Recreation Department, make considerably less money. According to Open the Books, "the highest paid pool lifeguard was given $65,000 compensation—$53,000 in total pay, and $13,000 in benefits, which is about 12% that of the highest paid ocean lifeguard."
Lifeguards play a critical role in protecting people and saving lives. The United States Lifesaving Association estimates that 78,951 people across the country were rescued by lifeguards in 2024. But given how much people pay for the same work elsewhere—and given L.A.'s history of overpaying its public servants—taxpayers are forgiven for wondering whether their dollars could be used more wisely.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Could cause LA to be swimming in debt.
They can wave their budget goodbye.
Regardless, they’ll be drowning in red ink.
Just the swirling of dem politics. Tides will turn some day.
Will be a real beach to wade through this ocean of debt.
The sharks are circling.
On porpoise?
You're giving me a haddock.
Wasn’t going to let folks just skate by.
They could flounder.
No ray of hope?
Kind of misleading. Reason wants you to think that these are kids sitting by a pool, when some of these Lifeguards are highly trained water rescue specialists. Many of them are trained paramedics or EMT's. The unmentioned problem here is the power that California's Public Sector Unions have and how the State and Local Governments kow tow to them.
^This
Open the Books found that 45 lifeguards "collected between $50,000 and $171,000" in overtime payments alone.
This is usually fraud.
Your attention dips, yet some of these lifeguards are working 80+ hour weeks?
Probably. Guards are only posted during the prime beach months and they probably can't hire a lot so those the get on are getting all the overtime they can do during thosse months
Same as where I currently work. It's seasonal so a lot of us are trying to grab as many of shifts as possible.
True, but the season in Southern California is a hell of a lot longer than it is in Chicago. While our season lasts from late May/early June to late August/early September, theirs is almost year-round with temperatures in the high 70s in January and February when the Lake here is frozen over near shore.
The lifeguards could have animal companions to assist them with their job. Like K9 service dogs. But bears. Bears in trunks.
Who cares? Paramedics and EMT don't get $300K. Perhaps it is a union problem, but it is a problem.
Um, some C-suite employees don't make 300k a year. California is a cancer. Time to start testing tactical nukes in SoCal and NoCal.
Do you want to lose David Hasselhoff to the competition?
Some people stand in the darkness, afraid to step into the light.
Seared into my mind as well. I know what you were using that fist of etiquette for...
According to the Baywatch documentary, LA County lifeguards aren't just rescuing drowning kids and picking up chicks, they're solving crimes and stopping drug lords and human traffickers, and are in Olympic level shape, even past age 40. Of course they should be paid like cops.
The United States Lifesaving Association estimates that 78,951 people across the country were rescued by lifeguards in 2024.
And if the estimate was 10% of that number I might even believe it.
With or from covid?
All depends on what constitutes a "rescue".
That's over 200 people per day. You'd think we would hear more about it.
Lifeguards are also provided with a generous pension plan, which allows them to retire after 30 years
No one wants to look at a 48-year-old sitting in that big chair.
Lifeguard Chief Fernando Boiteux was the top earner, receiving $523,351 in total compensation.
That's weird, considering that $70.8 million divided by 134 lifeguards is over $529k.
Math is racist, you racist.
Number likely includes costs of retired lifeguards.
Some thing here
1. Ocean lifeguards are not doing the same job as lake guards.
2. The ocean off LA is very different than the ocean off Miami.
3. There is going to be a lot of overtime because this is a seasonal job with demanding physical requirements - you're not getting aot of qualified applicants and you need to incentivize returning (though 500k for the Chief is ridiculous).
4. Pension is iffy but you'd expect to need to retire your lifeguards early because of the physical requirements.
This doesn't mean the city isn't screwing taxpayers, but these items need to be considered when doing comparisons.
In addition, with 1,500 lifeguards in the county, the chief is not putting on sunblock. He's the chief administrator of a sizeable department. But $500k sounds way too high even for a top management position.
Should have sent them a resume when I got out of the Navy in the 80's. I could have retired by now.
A job of demanding physical requirements and attentive requirements shows detrimental drop off after a certain number of hours. Pushing overtime for more pay for the employee puts the actual taxpayers paying them at increased risk.
Of course he makes half a mil. You're talking about a state that thinks $30/hr is slave wages to hand out cold burgers and wrong change.
Just for the record:
A study by Redfin found that the income needed to buy a median-priced home in Los Angeles was over $220,000.
It's the CA death spiral. If they ever get housing prices down then there will be tons of severely overpaid people. If you can ride out a career in CA with these salaries and get that pension and then move into a low cost part of the country you will retire in style. Meanwhile, future CA taxpayers will subsidize this lifestyle
Even the leftists in California are starting to notice that most of their high taxes are going to public employees, their benefits, and pensions of former public employees, and not to all of the progressive programs they want the money to go to.
Public employee unions raise money, endorse candidates, and fund campaigns. Leftist politicians ensure that public employee unions have generous pay, generous benefits, generous pension plans, and lax policies for determining overtime and disability qualification.
Then they complain about the poor, heroic long-suffering public servants making due on a pittance, while advocating for housing set-asides and discounts for those poor public servants.
...because that's what happens when people flip the purpose of Gov 'Guns' on their head from defending Liberty and ensuring Justice to 'armed-theft' supply for them.
There is no supply-n-demand balance anymore and whom ever cries to the Gov-Gun-Gods the hardest gets to STEAL the most from those 'icky' people. Just like a criminal gang.
There is no such thing as a free lunch. Put the Gov-'Guns' back into there only humanitarian purpose (i.e. to ensuring Justice for all) instead of making them 'armed-theft' gangland criminals for hire.
You don't see private pools paying their lifeguards that much *because* private companies don't get to legally run around with 'Guns' STEALING from all the people.
Exactly how many lives did the 134 save?