The Decentralized Master Planning of Seaside, Florida
The city where The Truman Show was filmed balances communal norms with private preferences.

This is part of Reason's 2025 summer travel issue. Click here to read the rest of the issue.
You might not expect there to be much for libertarians to like about a town that boasts a master plan, where design conformity is rigorously enforced across virtually every building and street, and whose admirers wax poetic about a building code that covers "everything from building materials to roof pitch."
But Seaside, Florida, often defies expectations. It's a town built on political contradictions: Its surfaces are planned and regulated down to the last nail, but it boasts of individual freedom in its building designs. It was founded on neo-hippie environmental and communitarian ideals, but it was privately built on explicitly capitalist notions of urban development. It's designed to feel like both a tiny town and a big city, with the comfortable intimacy of small village life and the walkable amenities of a major metro area. It's a haven for structural conformity, but it played an important role in bringing more choice in education to one of America's biggest states. It's a utopian architectural vision that resists pure utopianism.
If you know one thing about Seaside, it's probably that it was the principal filming location for the 1998 film The Truman Show—the story of a man living a life of seemingly idyllic ordinariness in what amounts to a fantasy of American small-town life. It turns out that every aspect of his life has been contrived and constructed for other people's entertainment: He's the sole nonactor in a television show about his life, and his perfect little town is actually a vast set on the world's largest soundstage, with every detail, from tiny interactions with neighbors to the timing of the sunrise, stage-managed by a godlike producer character watching over his every move. (Amusingly, the house used in the movie is the childhood beach getaway of Matt Gaetz, the controversial former congressman whom Donald Trump nominated to be attorney general.)
The Truman Show is a story of liberatory self-awakening, in which a man must escape from a planned paradise that is also a prison. But in the real world, Seaside is the sort of place people want to escape to—precisely because of the meticulous planning.
Envisioned in the 1970s by a group of young, forward-thinking architects who saw themselves as holistic community planners rather than merely building designers, Seaside was meant to embody an ideal of unhurried, beachside life, away from both the stress of the big cities and the cookie-cutter isolation of the suburbs. Over the years, it has become ground zero for a popular and influential vision of American city planning known as New Urbanism.
Building began in 1981 with what the city's founder Robert Davis has described as a "conservative business plan and a progressive, perhaps even radical, social plan." In the 2013 book Visions of Seaside, a collection of essays on the town's architectural history and ideals edited by Dhiru A. Thadani, Seaside's planners and residents write expansively about the alleged evils of suburban sprawl and necessity of "liberating" people from cars. But they also position the town's development within the context of "the specific, distinctly, if not quite uniquely, American tradition of capitalist-sponsored town development, a tradition that existed for 100 years before World War II."
Seaside isn't a movie set, but even apart from its connection to The Truman Show, it can feel like one. The town employs a distinctive color scheme of weathered whites and beachy pastels, with wood slat home construction and community buildings that show off stately columns meant to evoke a nostalgic Americana. On sunny spring days, the streets are crowded with tourists, many of whom come simply for the town's ambiance.
If you're planning your own trip to Seaside, make sure to book several hours just for walking around. The town sits on some of Florida's most stunning beachside real estate, with soft sand that is nearly snow white and Gulf waves that sparkle emerald green in the right light.
Beyond the natural amenities, commerce is central to the town's vision of itself. Walk in from the beach and you'll find a boardwalk speckled with cute, quaint shops, selling beachy clothes and ice cream. Stroll across the street and you'll encounter the grand lawn, surrounded by shops that have become a central part of the town's character, including Sundog Books and Modica Market, a deli and specialty grocery market that was featured in The Truman Show. And if you're staying for a meal, be sure to stop in at Bud and Alley's, a Seaside institution that has been in business since 1986, and which was named after two of the town's earliest residents, a dog (Bud) and a cat (Alley).
Combined with the tidy meticulousness of the townscape, the throngs of flip-flop–wearing tourists can make Seaside feel a bit like Disneyland. It's no surprise, then, that Seaside's closest analog—and, perhaps, competitor—is the central Florida town of Celebration, a master-planned community founded in the 1990s by The Walt Disney Company.
The structures may be tightly controlled, but outside of the vast main lawn the landscaping is not: One of the early rules was that home builders could only clear a small buffer around the construction zone. The rest of the original foliage had to be left in place, unkempt and wild, which means that today the town's residential streets are marked by overgrown trees and bushes, giving the roads a lush, green, pleasantly shaggy character.

Even the town's zoning rules are derived from a more propertarian, decentralized understanding of city building codes: Seaside was an innovator in "form-based" building codes focused on aesthetics and ideals. This approach leaves individual property owners with far more flexibility to build personalized, individualized spaces, particularly when it comes to home interiors, than they have under more traditional zoning rules that focus more on strict land-use regulation.
Built on an initial plot of 80 acres that Davis' father purchased in the 1940s, Seaside is a grand vision of intimate small-town life, organized around a vast, grassy town center that features a mix of shops and community buildings, including a tiny post office. Serendipitous community engagement is part of the design schema: Many Seaside houses feature expansive screened-in porches meant to draw people out of their homes, originally built without air conditioning, on warm evenings. The design was meant to facilitate free-range childhoods: In Visions of Seaside, longtime resident Isaac Stein writes of walking and biking to school on his own as he grew up. "I thought it was normal for kids to be free after school to explore," he writes. "I felt more like an adult. I was able to mature at a young age, function on my own."
The city's approach to education also has more room than most places for innovation and local control. In the 1990s, a group of Seaside parents wanted to create a small, local school. The result was the Seaside Neighborhood School, which was built with funds raised from the filming of The Truman Show and went on to become one of Florida's earliest and most successful experiments with charter schooling. It helped kick-start Florida's education reform movement, and is now the oldest active charter school in the state.
The master-planned aesthetic order of Seaside won't be for everyone, and the control it exerts over its streets and houses will irk those freedom lovers who prefer a more anarchic urban disjunction. But the pleasures of Seaside—and even its critics tend to admit that it is exceptionally, perhaps even eerily, pleasant—have arisen primarily from private entrepreneurship and local efforts, from contractual controls and decentralized development, from the way it has balanced communal norms with private preferences. The most unexpected thing about Seaside is that it somehow channels all of these impulses simultaneously, pulling together disparate worldviews and ideologies into a coherent whole. It's restrictive. It's liberating. It's both—and that's what makes it so special.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "In Seaside, Living Is a Way of Life."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Okay, good, they're happy, I'm happy, and none of my business.
But I go with Jane Jacobs and Joel Kotkin et al. that that is not a good model in general.
None of this is libertarian. Reason lost the plot hundreds of miles ago
What's not libertarian about it? Is your idea of "libertarian" too narrow to sustain a monthly?
When our AI androids replace us, this will be their ideal community.
Well, either this, or the Los Angeles in the original Blade Runner.
The Nexus Sarc android would drink a lot and play the victim card. Less human than human.
Looks messy.
I guess it can be "libertarian" to deliberately give up freedom and live a life of conformance. But it sure doesn't feel right.
Conform scrupulously in public and on the surface, but do as you wish behind closed doors and drawn curtains. That's Victorianism, no libertarianism.
I think you at least see the problem with most of the comments here. I'm not sure why the whole covenant / HOA thing is such a trigger here. Nobody forced anyone to buy homes there. A private investor built a unique community with strict building codes so Captain Fweedom couldn't come put a junked out Duster on blocks in his front yard.
I don't particularly want to live there, though it's plainly nicer than some of the places I've lived. But if enough people choose to live there specifically because of the style and the codes, how is that not the very definition of free will?
Or is that not what you want? Do you want everyone to conform to your desire for no housing codes and no rules? Is that more choice or less choice? If you want anarchy, move to Africa or Central America. I'm sure you can keep goats in the front yard and paint the tin roof any color you want. Right before a drug lord comes along and rapes your daughter. But at least you didn't have to bow to that oppressive HOA board.
Always been my take as well.
I will criticize an HOA who tries to force non HOA property into their union though.
Agreed, and pretty much the inverse scenario. Set up the rules at the outset, let the free market play out, and then leave me the eff alone.
This is a personal trigger. If you have to have rules, changing them after the fact is what causes one person harm to help another. That's harmful and a power that leads to corruption.
Like you said, set rules up at the outset, before people decided to join, and then everyone's on the same playing field.
I have the same problem with developers who buy a lot with restrictive zoning, get a big discount because of it, then get politicians they own to rezone it so they can build unrestricted.
At least with an HOA around here most CC&Rs are pretty binding without the overwhelming majority of the HOA members being on board. There can be petty squabbles, but it's a covenant between a hundred people, and relatively more restricted than a city (or larger) government in what they can do.
In most communities, the most common way to abrogate previous zoning for a developer is with the "Planned Unit Development" (PUD) process. It's basically a Get Out Of Your Zoning Free card that has stood up to court challenges.
Here it has been a few things, including suddenly zoning a whole neighborhood for Air BnB... not going to bitch about that one just now...
The LATEST is to use the state's affordable housing mandate that Reason loves so fucking much. Local lot with a group of stores, a restaurant, and a grocery store on it, that has been zoned only low density commercial/retail forever.
Developer bought it for relatively cheap, then got Sacramento to allow not only residential development, but even to go two stories taller than any other development in town has been allowed. Add some percentage of below market price units and you can build high density 5 story housing on what the city wouldn't allow the old owner to do for a decade.
Good trick. I mean, we get low income housing 6 blocks from the beach and everyone in the old city gets their views blocked, and the old owners could have sold for 2 million more or developed themselves if that was the law when the lot sold... I swear those fuckers want every place to be as shitty as the tenderloin in San Francisco.
I agree, in thought and action.
When we lived on the fringe of Houston, we bought a house in a neighborhood with a moderately strict HOA because many homes in the surrounding areas had "interesting" neighbors, expressing themselves in ways we did not want to live next to. We gave up some individual freedom, as a private market choice.
And I think of zoning in the same way. Although it gives many libertarians boners, undoing some types of residential zoning essentially steals from those who made free market choices, and often paid more. If you bought a single family lot without thinking--or thinking you would get the zoning changed so you could build a multiplex or apartment building--that's your problem, not an expression of government overreach.
100%
a junked out Duster on blocks in his front yard...goats in the front yard and paint the tin roof any color you want.
Are you looking at my house on Street View?
I'd make an exception for you. Just give me a minimum 2-house buffer zone.
BTW, did the Seaside aesthetic code also specify purple sky?
The magazine, like its subscribers and the 2024 LP POTUS candidate, isn’t libertarian.
Openly Gay, Closet Progressive
Only Reason could unironically write an article about a community which defines the platonic ideal of NIMBY type development rules, and respond with, "Groovy, outta sight!"
This community must be frequented by food trucks operated by illegal aliens that offer weed and Mexican ass sex.
With 16 yr old's on the pole... mandatory.
Is this a follow up article on the tourist trap theme?
communal norms
I'm guessing these are the 'right' communal norms, and not the 'wrong' communal norms, otherwise this article would look very different.
It's restrictive. It's liberating. It's both—and that's what makes it so special.
Like, far out, man. So like, dig, let's have a rap session about what we think about local zoning rules based on "communal norms" which might like, result in some bummer head trip NIMBYism, which might be overridden by some totally cool, way out YIMBY state rules that can only be described with two words: Right on!
Perfection
These answers puzzle me. What are the cereals approved for Libertarian breakfast? I don't live in Seaside so --- aside from this being a discussion site---- I'll say it: This is none of my business nor of any non-Seaside person.
If I have any Libertarian maxim it's "don't have an opinion on every damn thing "
Sarc’s breakfast is packaged in a bottle wrapped in a brown paper bag.
Since we're mostly old white American men here, cereal for breakfast is not a good idea—too much carbohydrate. Have a couple of eggs and some sausage.
It's a vacation community on one of the best stretches of beach in the US, that's why it succeeds.
I do not enjoy these planned, New Urbanist type of communities. We have one nearby in St. Charles, MO, called NewTown. And it isn't just that it feels kind of fake and out of place (it does). My main issue with them is that there simply isn't any sort of natural, intuitively understandable hierarchy between the buildings, roads, and open spaces, that happens when you allow an area to develop organically.
Everything is the way it is because someone deemed it so. You have large, 4 lane roads, that should feel like a main thoroughfare, but don't lead out or to any destination of note. You have large public buildings in the middle of a residential street. Courtyards and small parks in areas that don't really make any sense. This side of the street looks like New England, the other looks like Savannah. Why?