Pennsylvania Gives Amazon Potentially Unlimited Sales Tax Exemption
The tech and online retail giant will build at least two data centers in the Keystone State but pay no sales taxes on equipment.

Amazon, the tech and online retail juggernaut, is expanding its physical footprint, with a little help from Pennsylvania taxpayers.
"Amazon plans to spend $20 billion to build two data centers in Pennsylvania, a move that state officials say will generate thousands of jobs over the next decade and stoke considerable economic activity," wrote Stephen Caruso and Kate Huangpu of Spotlight PA, an independent media outlet. "But many key details, like the centers' full impact on electricity supply and prices, and the amount of tax revenue the state will forfeit to Amazon, are still unknown."
"In March 2024, Talen Energy sold its 960-megawatt (MW) data center to Amazon Web Services (AWS) for $650 million," Jeff Luse wrote in November 2024 for Reason. "The data center is a co-located facility, meaning it will draw electricity directly from Susquehanna Steam Electric Station—a nuclear power plant that generates 2.5 gigawatts of power annually—rather than from the grid." The other facility will be located in a former U.S. Steel mill and hook into the state's existing power grid, and there is the possibility of a third facility later on.
The data centers will support Amazon's artificial intelligence and cloud computing, which require substantial processing power. Rick Siger, secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development, said the project "will drive enormous positive tax impacts for our Commonwealth, counties, and municipalities, and will create at least 1,250 high-paying, high-tech jobs as well as thousands of construction jobs."
Unfortunately, that's not a guarantee. "The data center industry has grown rapidly in recent years, and state governors have touted the jobs it would create," Ellen Thomas wrote at Business Insider. But "once built, data center facilities don't employ large numbers of permanent employees, and the economic development contracts they sign in exchange for tax incentives often reflect that."
Data centers do initially create plenty of work for construction crews, but once operational, they require only a small permanent staff for general upkeep. "Most permanent data center jobs are in security and landscaping, alongside a handful of technicians who monitor the facilities' computers," write Caruso and Huangpu, citing Greg LeRoy of public subsidy watchdog organization Good Jobs First.
In fairness, Pennsylvania is spending considerably less taxpayer money than most states do to attract new businesses. Officials in St. Joseph County, Indiana, voted last year to give Amazon tax breaks and incentives worth $4 billion or more, to build a data center in the area. Arlington County, Virginia, offered Amazon as much as $750 million to build its second corporate headquarters there.
On the other hand, Pennsylvania's "only direct financial investment" in its Amazon data centers will come in the form of "$10 million for 'targeted workforce development efforts,'" Caruso and Huangpu write. But that doesn't mean Keystone State taxpayers are otherwise off the hook: "Pennsylvania didn't offer a new, targeted incentive package to Amazon, but the tech giant has already been approved for a tax break that the commonwealth gives to companies that build data centers here."
A state program exempts large data centers from paying sales tax on any purchases of certain "computer data center equipment." Any company that spends at least $75 million of "new investment" to create a data center that "creates 25 new jobs" in a county with no more than 250,000 residents, and pays at least $1 million in annual payroll at the site, can apply for an exemption from all sales taxes paid to purchase equipment to operate servers, including software, cooling systems, and security and monitoring equipment.
"The law requires neither the buyer nor the seller to report the cost of exempt transactions to the state," Caruso and Huangpu add. "That means the exact cost is unknown. Still, the state estimates the lost tax revenue in budgets." In his budget proposal for the 2025–26 fiscal year, Gov. Josh Shapiro estimated $43.1 million in lost tax revenue from the program, growing to $51.1 million by the end of the decade. Former Gov. Tom Wolf predicted in his proposal for the 2022–23 fiscal year that by 2025, the program would cost nearly $75 million in lost revenue. "Jeffrey Johnson, a spokesperson for the Department of Revenue, said the original projection was reduced after lower-than-expected use in early years," Caruso and Huangpu write.
Still, it's worth remembering that Amazon—the world's second-largest company by revenue, behind only Walmart—committed to spend $20 billion on data centers in Pennsylvania alone. Clearly, the tech giant is not hurting for cash, and Pennsylvania taxpayers should not be on the hook for a potentially unlimited cash giveaway to a private company.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Most permanent data center jobs are in security and landscaping, alongside a handful of technicians who monitor the facilities' computers,"
And even some of those can be outsourced to India.
AI can monitor security cameras and aim lasers.
AI can monitor other AI.
So it comes down to the gardeners.
Oh, well; at least Amazon will reduce prices because of the tax savings, right?
So, the jobs of the illegal Mexicans will be spared.
Does anything else matter?
Four Seasons Landscaping will get the contract!
Any company that spends at least $75 million of "new investment" to create a data center that "creates 25 new jobs" in a county with no more than 250,000 residents, and pays at least $1 million in annual payroll at the site, can apply for an exemption from all sales taxes paid to purchase equipment to operate servers, including software, cooling systems, and security and monitoring equipment.
Wow, 25 whole jobs created at least!
A lower bar is hard to imagine.
At least 25 jobs and at least $1M in payroll.
Which is only $40k/year/job.
Security guards and maintenance and landscaping.
Full time minimum wage in Seattle is $43k a year, so yeah not even minimum wage. Definitely doing the jobs that Nick Gillespie won't do.
In PA, minimum wage is $15k (federal minimum), possibly jumping to $25-30k next year (https://www.spotlightpa.org/news/2025/06/minimum-wage-15-pennsylvania-house-senate-philadelphia/).
Why would PA care what minimum wage is in Seattle?
Yeah, I did payroll myself for years. Either way for all those tax benefits 25 jobs seems like jack shit.
a move that state officials say will generate thousands of jobs over the next decade
and zero bathroom breaks.
"Pennsylvania Gives Amazon Potentially Unlimited Sales Tax Exemption."
Sounds good to me as long as PA gives other companies the same exemption.
Otherwise, the word "favoritism" might apply here.
$20B in data centers, if most of that expense is in equipment, that's $1.6B in sales tax?
But the program only costs $50M/year across all recipients?
Not collecting tax isn’t spending.
No, it's not. Letting businesses keep their own money is not a "cash giveaway".
And it's really bothering me that HyR bloggers keep trying to slip that one past the readers. Why do they do this? Are they following some ideology that says generality (rather than least total burden) of laws is the most important desideratum?
Fine. Repeal all taxes. Please post your address in your next comment so that I can come steal everything in your house. Since there are no taxes there will be no Socialist Police, no Socialist Prosecutors, no Socialist Judges, no Socialist Prisons, no consequences for any action. Come to think of it, I'll squat in your house and shoot you if you try to enter. Somalia doesn't have taxes you should move there.
Private police is a thing.
We don't need police to protect us from Leftist rainbow freaks. In fact, without police, Leftist rainbow freaks would find life much harder. Charliehall, not too bright.
Nice false dichotomy you have there. It's too bad you lack the imagination to conceive of any other way to fund government provided "services" or to provide for any of those services privately.
We definitely need less Socialist police and Socialist prosecutors and Socialist judges. Prosecutors take extra steps to "Win" once they pick the loser, and judges now are not enforcing the law for private citizens.
Let's check the math. Assume $75 million in equipment at 6% PA sales tax rate = $4,500,000. And assume the new 25 jobs are actually at $75,000/yr. That generates $75,000 x 25 x 3.07% PA income tax rate = $58,000/yr. Gee, it only takes PA 77 years to recover the $4.5 million in foregone sales taxes! Sounds like the kind of ROI that would have gotten me laughed out (or fired) had I proposed this to my boss in private industry.
Is the sole function of government to collect taxes?
Maybe. But for sure the sole function of private enterprise, and employees, is to pay taxes.
Most government subsidies to businesses are even bigger losers.
Corporate welfare at it's worst. Data centers provide no benefits to a community and drive up electric prices.
Then get the fuck off the internet, you stupid cunt.
Yup. Pennsylvania should know better.
How about that. NO TARIFFS (or I mean taxes)! /s
Talk about talking out of both sides of your faces Reason writers.
Reason commenters oppose all taxes except for the ones Trump likes.
And then theirs the truth on the matter, "Leftards support MORE taxes except for the ones Trump likes."
Because Self-Projection is all leftards have got.
Someday, some economically rational people would set tax policy, and eliminate taxes on businesses. And also subsidies.
In a pipe dream.
Only in a libertarian magazine could you get writers saying that not paying taxes is a cost and that a corporation's value to the public is mostly in the amount of tax it pays.
And the purpose of government is to maximize tax revenue.
Anyone who writes "power plant that generates 2.5 gigawatts of power annually" does not deserve to be paid, much less quoted.
Oh, for fuck's sake. This exemption isn't a special selected-by-a-crony lobbied-for handout specific to Amazon, this is a standard standing statutory tax exemption for what is, in this context, capital equipment. What's next, a shocking expose on the fact that Pennsylvania is one of the 42 states that don't charge sales tax for manufacturing equipment? If Toyota opens an auto plant in Harrisburg, it won't pay one cent in sales tax on all those big expensive machines used to make cars! What a huge taxpayer-paid subsidy!
Sigh.
If you tax the purchase of capital equipment -- and in a data center, the computers are capital equipment -- you simply convince capital-intensive businesses to that can locate elsewhere to do so, because you've made starting up operations in your state more expensive by the sales tax rate for no benefit to the company. And capital equipment is the key to economic productivity, so the resulting deadweight loss is particularly acute.
Thus the common manufacturing equipment exemption. And thus the two dozen or so states that have created exemptions for computers and related items (which are usually taxed as office equipment) when they are used in data centers.
Seriously, everybody involved in this article's publication should be fired from Reason for gross ignorance of basic capitalist economics. If they were alive today, Milton Friedman would bust a cap in Joe Lancaster's ass for claiming the exemption of capital equipment from a consumption tax was an "unlimited cash giveaway", Friedrich Hayek would stand guard to make sure Lancaster bled out, and Ludwig von Mises would walk around telling the witnesses they didn't see nuthin'.
Yes!