10 of the Worst State Laws Going Into Effect in July
From minimum wage hikes to bans on cellphones in public schools, here are some of the most ridiculous ways state governments are interfering with Americans’ lives.

Even though most state legislatures are done for the year, Americans can expect the government to keep interfering with their lives. Starting July 1, many new state laws take effect. Here are 10 of the most ridiculous.
1. Florida Requires Schools To Call the Gulf of Mexico the 'Gulf of America'
On Inauguration Day, President Donald Trump signed an executive order renaming the Gulf of Mexico the "Gulf of America." In response, Florida passed House Bill 549, which, effective July 1, requires state agencies to update geographic materials to reflect the new federal designation. The law also requires "each district school board or charter school governing board" to adopt "instructional materials…and library media center collections that reflect" the new designation of the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America.
H.B. 549 is not only intrusive to local school districts' authority over what their students should learn but also costly to the taxpayers who are funding the purchase of all new materials.
2. Minimum Wage Hikes Across 3 States
Across the country, minimum wage increases will take effect on July 1. In Alaska, the minimum wage is increasing from $11.91 per hour to $13 per hour. In Oregon, the standard minimum wage will rise from $14.70 per hour to $15.05 per hour. And in Washington, D.C., the minimum wage will hike from $17.50 per hour to $17.95 per hour.
Proponents of raising the minimum wage argue that an increase is necessary to ensure everyone is given a "living wage." But these actions can have unintended consequences, like causing overall employment to decrease, increasing prices for consumers, or causing businesses to close. In D.C., a minimum wage increase for tipped workers was paused until October due to many restaurants being unable to afford the increase from $10 per hour to $12 per hour for these employees.
3. Alabama Bans Smokable Hemp Products
Under a new Alabama law, H.B. 445, it will be illegal to sell or possess smokable hemp products. While consumable hemp products like gummies or drinks will be allowed, smokable products are specifically excluded and banned. "Possession or sale of those products on or after July 1, 2025 could subject an individual to prosecution for a Class C felony," the attorney general's office said. In Alabama, a Class C felony is punishable by one to 10 years of imprisonment.
The remainder of the legislation, which sets requirements for the sale of edible hemp products, dosage limitations, and enforcement by the Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, won't take effect until 2026.
4. Vape Registration in Wisconsin
Starting July 1, vape product manufacturers must certify with the Wisconsin Department of Revenue that their products have been authorized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or have submitted a premarket tobacco product application annually. The goal of the law is to deter tobacco shops from selling harmful products, but few vapor products have received FDA approval. Critics say the legislation will hurt small business owners and their employees. "Pretty much every vapor product across the board is effectively banned," Amber Crawford, a Wisconsin vape shop owner, told WQOW, an ABC News affiliate. "It's about 70% of my revenue," Crawford said. "We're going to lose dozens of jobs of people that care about it deeply. Chances are I will get laid off and the store will close."
5. Cellphones Banned in Virginia Public Schools
Beginning July 1, Virginia school boards will be required to implement policies restricting cellphone possession and use by students during school hours. The bill aims to reduce learning disruptions, like bullying and harassment, while carving out exceptions—like to address a health concern—and dictates that punishments for cellphone possession alone shall not include a school resource officer, suspension, or expulsion.
Such bans have increased in popularity in part because smart devices have been blamed for causing more depression, anxiety, and bullying among kids and teens, but implementing state-wide policies could backfire. The data are unclear on whether devices are the cause of concerning mental health trends among school-age children, and parents aren't sold on banning devices. A survey earlier this year found that most parents believe cellphones have a positive effect on their kids' lives. Regardless of their impact, there is no clear one-size-fits-all solution.
6. Virginia Expands Cyberbullying Prevention Policies in Public Schools
Public schools in Virginia must also include procedures for preventing and prohibiting cyberbullying both on and off school property in their guidelines and codes of conduct starting July 1. The legislation defines cyberbullying as "bullying that occurs through the use of technology…capable of accessing the internet." It also mandates that schools provide protections so that students aren't deterred from reporting bullying and provide resources and support for student victims of cyberbullying. Forcing schools to regulate speech outside of school property introduces First Amendment concerns if policies are overly broad or vague.
7. Prohibiting Gender Transition Treatments for Minors in Kansas
Under the Help Not Harm Act, minors will be restricted from certain gender treatments beginning July 1, after the Legislature successfully overrode Gov. Laura Kelly's (D–Kan.) veto in February. Under the new law, gender transition treatments, including hormone blockers and surgery, are prohibited, and state funds, including Medicaid, cannot be used to pay for these treatments. Providing such treatments is defined under the law as unprofessional conduct, and those who violate the law can have their license revoked and be held strictly liable if sued.
The legislation is meant to protect children "from the irreversible harms of experimental gender transition surgeries and medicines," according to a joint statement from Republican state Reps. Chris Croft, Dan Hawkins, and Blake Carpenter regarding the veto override. But whether these treatments are deemed beneficial or harmful, the practical implication of this new law is that parents now have less authority over the care their children receive.
8. Wyoming Restricts Access to Bathrooms and Other Public Facilities
Joining 18 other states with public bathroom restrictions, Wyoming's H.B. 72 requires persons to use the bathrooms, locker rooms, and showers in public facilities that correspond to their biological sex. Rather than punish individuals either civilly or criminally for using the wrong facility, it is up to the government body operating the facility to enforce the law, or face civil liabilities. But like other states that have tried to enforce bathroom use based on sex, the law creates fear and uncertainty about what is permissible use and what the consequences of any violations may be.
9. Gender Identity Removed From Iowa Civil Rights Act
Under Iowa Senate File 418, gender identity is no longer protected from discrimination in housing, employment, wages, and public accommodations under the state's civil rights code. Additionally, Iowans can no longer change their sex designation on a birth certificate after undergoing a medical gender transition. Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds stated that before the bill was signed, "the Civil Rights Code blurred the biological line between the sexes" and put commonsense protections for women and girls at risk. Iowa will be the first state in the country to take away civil rights from a group it previously protected since 2007.
10. The Sunshine State Expands Death Penalty Executions
Florida has carried out seven executions in 2025, with an eighth scheduled for July. To continue these executions, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis signed H.B. 903, authorizing the state of Florida to use any execution method "not deemed unconstitutional," including firing squads, nitrogen gas, and hanging. There are 269 inmates currently on death row.
Since the reinstatement of the death penalty in 1976, Florida has executed 113 people by either electrocution or lethal injection. In that same time, 30 people sentenced to death in the state have been exonerated. The death penalty remains controversial for many reasons, not least of which is the significant risk of executing an innocent person.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
" Wyoming's H.B. 72 requires persons to use the bathrooms, locker rooms, and showers in public facilities that correspond to their biological sex."
This is bad law because it is logical, make sense and offends only the really stupid morons on the left, isn't that right, Billings?
No, it's bad because how you going to enforce it ? Am I going to be strip searched everytime I want to use the ladies room ? Who is going to decide if I am woman-looking enough to warrant scrutiny ? How hard is it to get a fake ID with whatever gender I want on it ? Is some goon going to try make raise my skirt so he can double check ? How is anyone going to know if the creep trying to check me is actually just getting his rocks off ? This whole thing creates more problems than it solves.
No thanks.
Edit: And no ... having a female goon squad do it doesn't make it any less invasive, either.
No, it's bad because how you going to enforce it ?
The same time honored fashion we used to use. A dude in the girls room gets arrested (or his ass kicked).
Yeah back in the day brothers and uncles and fathers took care of that shit but that was deemed toxic. Still going on under the radar.
You are ignoring the obvious ... how are you going to know who is what ? Especially without damn near breaking the law yourself ?
https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/local/collin-county/man-follows-woman-into-restroom-after-mistaking-her-for-a-man/287-160568442
It’s usually really fucking obvious. Except for in your extreme far left hypothetical imagination. And FYI, for male trannies, hands are always a dead giveaway.
No ... it is not always obvious. The most victimized are actual women who don't fit the norm. (i.e. - short hair lesbians, butch-types, women with hormone issues, etc. ) All at the mercy of over-eager busybodies trying to police others instead of minding their own business.
https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/women-boston-liberty-hotel-bathroom-gender/
https://www.boredpanda.com/athlete-kicked-out-of-womens-restroom-by-gender-police-who-thought-she-was-a-man/
https://www.yahoo.com/news/boebert-tries-evict-guy-ladies-001042065.html
You’re flailing, so you pull the bullshit that your kind always do. Find a few extreme outliers to justify stupid, malignant policies. And these are outliers.
My statement is correct, and still stands.
so you pull the bullshit that your kind always do.
Think ahead of the consequences before doing an action ?
Consider who might be harmed by the unintended fallout ?
Contemplate what the implementation of an action will actually look like ?
Yes... thinking, rational people do all of these things before plowing ahead with some half-baked idea that sounds good in their head, but has real world consequences to somebody else.
You aren't the one that is going to have to live with a full body check every time you want to use the bathroom. It's amazing how much people want to lord over things that will never affect them personally.
Call the TSA.
When a dude who "identifies as a woman" undresses to shower in the ladies' locker room at the gym and his penis is flopping around, I'm pretty sure even you will be able to tell that a cis-male is in a female designated space.
Why did trans people feel they needed special permission to use a particular bathroom when, as you say, it was always unenforceable?
Keep in mind laws like this are a downstream result of trans people making it into an issue, not an instigating event.
Make something stupid into a splinter issue, and win stupid prizes.
I think some of the goons who voted for that law WANT to strip search more women.
I don't care what bathroom you use I just want you to wash your hands afterwards.
Yeah, but you’re just a far left deviant. Decent people, don’t want that shit going on. Especially women and young girls who don’t want some freak show tranny with a dick in their space while they’re trying to change clothes or do their business.
And don’t try any of that willfully obtuse bullshit you democrats are infamous for.
It's really easy Liberty_Dunce. If you go in the female restroom and little Suzy is forced to see your little willy, little Suzy's mom calls the police and you get a vacation to the men's jail.
All emotional knee-jerking, zero practicality.
How are you going to find out who belongs ? Is little Suzy and little Suzy's Mom going to be thrown against a wall and spread-eagled by the gestapo so your morbid curiosity of what they're packing is satisfied ?
Billings is a pedofile cancer and deserves to be fed to the woodchipper
The parents of the two girls raped by a tranny boy in W.V. would have a few words to say.
The Libertarian position on this should be obvious and clear.
It is one thing for state run public facilities. There is understandable controversy there.
However, for private businesses, the government shouldn't be dictating bathroom policy either way.
Let the individual business make their own policy. If this is an important issue to people they can choose to only patron businesses that are in line with their values.
Since when doe libertarians believe the state should be in charge of dictating moral or culture issues? Let individual businesses decide their own policies and keep the state out of it.
Yes, this!
Well said!
Is #1 really the worst law ever?
Apart from #2, they look pretty good actually.
This is a really, really weak list. No cellphones in schools, 3 dealing with tranys. Making sure vapes aren't chinese knockoffs that are going to kill you. This is it?
Regardless of their impact, there is no clear one-size-fits-all solution.
Yes, there is. Kids should not be on the damned phone during class. Why is this even a discussion?
The idea that banning a cell phone in a class room is "one of the top ten worst laws being passed in AmeriKKKa" is so hilarious I think it might be parody.
agreed
If that’s truly in the top ten, then things are going pretty well. And really, about half of this list are good things. Unless you’re a am extreme far left democrat deviant.
It isn't a new law in VA. They started last year. Enforcement hasn't been too crazy in our district. Apparently even students see a positive impact.
Yeah, your right.
No kidding. That take is so retarded I am forced to assume every other law she opposed is pretty great. Guess I have to rethink my stance on the minimum wage now, Billings. Thanks, you ditzy hag.
I think it should be policy, I don't think it needs to be a legal issue. Making something a law always means that it will be enforced by the coercive power of government, meaning at gunpoint. If it's a policy, it's just dealing with the local level bureaucrats, but if it's a law, you're dealing with the state.
And if, for whatever reason, you need an exception (a kid with a specific health need or whatever), it's easier to go through the process with a principal or local school board than having to wrangle with the state. Now that it's law, local officials are going to be astonishingly unhelpful and will attempt to absolve themselves of any responsibility for both enforcement and adjudicating these decisions.
Finally, the tide is turning against the poisoning and mutilating of gay and mentally ill children. Instead of celebrating, Reason retarded perverts call it "ridiculous".
Florida Requires Schools To Call the Gulf of Mexico the 'Gulf of America'
That's not dumb. It is the Gulf of America.
You may as well say it's appropriate to demand they keep calling the Balkan states "Yugoslavia."
It's NOT Yugoslavia anymore.
Nor is it the Gulf of Mexico anymore.
Proponents of raising the minimum wage argue that an increase is necessary to ensure everyone is given a "living wage."
Still, nobody on Earth can seem to define the term "living wage." Or why it should be the basis of value for any job.
Alabama Bans Smokable Hemp Products
Drug laws are always welcome laws. (Felony! Nice!)
Now let's do something about the gummies and drinks too.
but few vapor products have received FDA approval
Why not?
Beginning July 1, Virginia school boards will be required to implement policies restricting cellphone possession and use by students during school hours.
This is nothing but helpful. AND folks are loving it.
Public schools in Virginia must also include procedures for preventing and prohibiting cyberbullying both on and off school property
This is kinda right there with "If you want a visa, then show me your social media history."
Meaning, it's a good thing.
No reason not to condition ones status as a student on said student not being a menace to the school or its student body.
after the Legislature successfully overrode Gov. Laura Kelly's (D–Kan.) veto in February
Will of the People, Autumn. They have firmly declared, "Stop mutilating the kids."
Respect it.
Wyoming's H.B. 72 requires persons to use the bathrooms, locker rooms, and showers in public facilities that correspond to their biological sex
And this is dumb why?
Under Iowa Senate File 418, gender identity is no longer protected from discrimination in housing, employment, wages, and public accommodations under the state's civil rights code.
Nor should it be. The LGBT Pedo tyranny's days are coming to an end.
Additionally, Iowans can no longer change their sex designation on a birth certificate after undergoing a medical gender transition.
Because cuttin' off your dingaling or grafting some non-functional cosmetic horror to your crotch ain't going to change your sex.
The Sunshine State Expands Death Penalty Executions
Not OK with that in general. Same reason abortion is 100% intolerable under any circumstances. Don't make mistakes you can't take back.
But...
authorizing the state of Florida to use any execution method "not deemed unconstitutional," including firing squads, nitrogen gas, and hanging.
As long as they're given a choice, I guess that's better than nothing.
Yes, we know you're an authoritarian who sees violence, especially government violence, as the solution to every problem in society.
Say "Gulf of America."
Be factually correct.
You can't do it, can you.
'Gulf of the Americas' would have been better, but of course Trump couldn't allow South America any skin in that game despite the Gulf spanning both continents.
It's dumb across the board. I thought Obama renaming mountains was just as idiotic.
South America has no skin in the game. Cuba, arguably - but screw them. The Gulf doesn't span both continents. WTF taught you geography?
Cuba is part of North America, you dumb motherfuckin' cracka
I get a kick out of the histrionics over Gulf of America. I agree, though in that Gulf of North America would be more accurate.
I prefer ‘Gulf of the United States of America’. No ambiguity, and it would anger the left even more.
I vote for Gulf of Columbus.
Changing the name only affects the US. It borders 3 countries and none of them have exclusive naming rights. Mexico refuses to call it Gulf of America, instead calling it América Mexicana as was first seen on maps in 1607, though this is probably just grandstanding. Cuba hasn't said an official word about it one way or the other.
That was then, this is now. Why do you insist on deadnaming the gulf?
Bigot.
Dear Leader has said it is to be Gulf of America, so the little fascist fuckwit has to go along with it. And clearly you're unable to distinguish between the geographical and the political.
Dear LeaderBob has said it is to beGulf of AmericaMary, so the little fascist fuckwit has to go along with it. And clearly you're unable to distinguish between thegeographicaldelusions and thepoliticalreality .The concept of doing anything patriotic really is anathema to you, isn’t it?
Go back to England. They already have hardcore Marxists in charge. You’ll love it.
I think we should go back to calling it The Gulf of New Spain or Sea of The North. Maybe Gulf of Cortez if we really want to set the leftists off.
If we're going for historical symbolism, he should've gone full tilt on "Gulf of The Confederacy" and then compromised on "Gulf of America". Probably could've done it to critical acclaim [snickers to self] if he worked a "Gulf of 1619", "Gulf of Transatlantic Prisoners-with-jobs", or "Gulf of Low-Wage Immigrant Labor" in the middle.
^Dis' right heah^
It is the Gulf of Mexico. Has been for five centuries. Trump and Florida are like the Ministry of Truth, rewriting history. Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
Everything has always had the same name, since forever. Nothing changes, gender in particular.
Not anymore.
It's not rewriting history. It's correcting a historical injustice and/or keeping up with current events.
But go ahead and keep calling it Yugoslavia. That doesn't make you a moron.
You mean like renaming the Cleveland Indians or Washington Redskins?
Five centuries of history should not be disturbed. But, as a compensation prize to the historically-challenged, that portion of the Gulf of Mexico sweeping clockwise from the Rio Grande to key West can be named the "Bight of Moronica". MAGA! Moronica for Morons! (Three Stooges #44 (1940), "You Nazty Spy")
Five centuries of history should not be disturbed.
OK, go tell all the Muslims who raze Churches to build mosques over their remains.
Now do Constantinople.
"abortion is 100% intolerable under any circumstances"
Abortion saves women's lives in some circumstances. Judaism mandates it in those situations.
Doesn't make it any less intolerable.
Who uses their own child as a meat shield. I mean, ffs. Who sees their child in the path of a speeding train and doesn't risk everything - themselves included, even in futility - to try and save him?
What parent goes home after that, indifferent, and thinks, "Eh, there was nothing I could do. It was him or me."
A friggin' sociopath who doesn't belong on this planet, that's who.
What about the cases where the choice isn’t “him or me”, but rather “him or both of us”? Or the case where it is “I can carry this baby and it will die before it could live on its own”? Your idea that abortion is always about using a child as a “meat shield” is morally abhorrent.
And I’m not pro-abortion, but I’ve known people who had to have abortions they didn’t want and who were heart broken because they wanted that baby more than anything, but they also didn’t want to die. Your stupid reduction to an idiotic dichotomy is offensive to them and their situation beyond belief.
What about the cases where the choice isn’t “him or me”, but rather “him or both of us”?
What about them? It's like the rape case. Or the incest case. Exception fallacies. Pointing to outliers doesn't - and shouldn't - determine the norm.
We can discuss the outliers if you want as one-offs, it's important to consider them - but they will never change the fact that abortion itself, on general principle, is 100% intolerable.
The tenor of such a conversation might be, "What you're doing IS awful, make no mistake about that, but I can appreciate that it's slightly less awful than killing him electively because he's inconvenient."
Also, worthy of consideration: you ever read one of those books or seen one of those movies where the good guy knows he can't save his buddy as death is quickly approaching them both - and the buddy is like, "Go, save yourself!" And the good guy refuses, electing instead to give their buddy some company on that last train west. (See also: the Ranger Creed.)
I don't know about you man, but if that truck is barreling down on my baby, I'm not throwing my hands up in helplessness (or, worse, indifference). I'm rushing out there if for no other reason than to carry him to Heaven so he doesn't have to go alone.
And I question the fitness for parenting of anyone who wouldn't.
Or the case where it is “I can carry this baby and it will die before it could live on its own”?
aka "I'm going to kill him for his own good."
Because that's not psychotic and horrible.
Your idea that abortion is always about using a child as a “meat shield” is morally abhorrent.
No it's not, because that's precisely what you're doing with it. I'm sorry you don't like it put into such stark contrast - but that's the reality of it all. It's ugly and horrible and grossly immoral.
Which is why it's intolerable.
From minimum wage hikes to bans on cellphones in public schools
When discussing "the worst" one of these is not like the other.
to adopt "instructional materials…and library media center collections that reflect" the new designation of the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America.
Look, I laugh at "The Gulf of Mexico" name change and yes, to me it's still "The Gulf of Mexico", but I still lovingly refer to Istanbul as "Constantinople". What I find extremely funny about how Journolismists seem to treat this controversy, is they believe the name "Gulf of Mexico" came down from God on some stone tablets.
Oh...
H.B. 549 is not only intrusive to local school districts' authority over what their students should learn but also costly to the taxpayers who are funding the purchase of all new materials.
Puhleeze.
Yes, the all new materials they're going to be buying anyway because textbooks are printed yearly.
School districts don't buy all new textbooks every year for every subject, of course, but science textbooks for biology are wrong the second they are printed so one assumes districts buy a lot of new books for a variety of dumb reasons.
Where was Reason moaning about all the money spent on new LGBTQI2MAP+ materials for the 'learning modules'?
, but science textbooks for biology are wrong the second they are printed
Exactly. On that Tuesday night in 2015, everyone on the planet knew what a "woman" was. By Wednesday morning...
I actually am referring to the fact that biology as a whole changes drastically from year to year. The entire 'science' is an exercise in recategorizing just about everything constantly so any textbook printed on the subject is out of date before it hits the shelf.
The jokes don't come with a roadmap...
[tilts hand] Sure, the blood you can see is blue in your veins isn't actually blue as it sits in the vacutainer, turns as bright red as arterial blood when exposed to air, and there are actual creatures with actually blue, copper-based blood, but the whole point of the lesson on the circulatory system isn't about how the lungs pump oxygen out to keep your veins blue and if that's the lesson/sperge dunk you took away from your Grade/High School biology/anatomy class, the textbook wasn't the problem.
Turns out the positive and negative poles on any given electrical circuit don't actually indicate the explicit direction electrons or "holes" flow either. Just like with sex and gender, doesn't mean all of electronics has been failing or only working out of a miraculous amount of luck for the last 100 yrs.
You do not know what a "woman" is.
Real lovers call it Byzantium.
Why on earth do Libertarians think that removing a previously-protected class from an antidiscrimination law is bad?
Why on earth do [libertarians] think that gender identity should have EVER been a government-defined 'protected class'? Especially when... if you know even a scintilla about how the courts have traditionally defined "protected classes"-- that those 'protected classes' are there because they might be discriminated against based on an immutable characteristic. Gender identity is definitionally mutable.
Because attempts at passing a law that says "Mind your own business and leave other people alone" never seemed to work.
Especially a protected class that has to tell you when they are a member, and can change their mind about it tomorrow.
There is absolutely nothing whatsoever stopping me from claiming to be trans to get a job, then after I'm hired saying 'oh, sorry, changed my mind. I'm a dude again!'.
Prove that those weren't sincerely held beliefs...you know...at the time.
Because there is no part of the Bill of Rights that says [WE] Identify-as the *special* people get to make DEMANDS on all those not special people.
Billings bewails the removal of gender identity from Iowa's Civil Rights Act. so "gender identity is no longer protected from discrimination in housing, employment, wages, and public accommodations".
Does this mean that in Iowa, bakers will be free to refuse to decorate cakes celebrating people's gender-ID changes, and photographers won't be compelled to provide their services for new-gender festivities? If so, that's indeed a sad encroachment on our liberties as free people.
Well, I'm not moving back to Illinois. I am the actual Iowa Native in my family. My wife and both kids were born in Illinois. They all gladly claim Iowa now. This is one more good reason.
Under the Help Not Harm Act, minors will be restricted from certain gender treatments beginning July 1, after the Legislature successfully overrode Gov. Laura Kelly's (D–Kan.) veto in February. Under the new law, gender transition treatments, including hormone blockers and surgery, are prohibited, and state funds, including Medicaid, cannot be used to pay for these treatments.
Really, Reason, you're going to go with THIS as one of the worst laws coming in 2025? When even Nick Fucking Gillespie kind of demurred on surgically sterilizing children? THIS is where you're going? Wow, we sure went licketysplit from "it's not happening", drove right past "Ok, it's happening but it's not as bad as you say" and are now cemented your feet right in "Yes it's happening, and it's a good thing".
Shut the fucking fuck up on "Gender Treatment". There literally is no such thing. Giving a kid cosmetic surgery and removing healthy organs and parts is not a 'treatment'. It's cosmetic surgery. And ghoulish cosmetic surgery at that-- on children who can't fucking consent.
If you can't even describe what this surgery and hormone therapies are "treating" then you can just fucking fuck right the fuck off.
It also limits parents authority over their children when they can't prostitute them out to random strangers, but somehow that's not considered a bad law for reasons.
Wow, we sure went licketysplit from "it's not happening", drove right past "Ok, it's happening but it's not as bad as you say" and are now cemented your feet right in "Yes it's happening, and it's a good thing".
Shut the fucking fuck up on "Gender Treatment".
Technically, we started out of the gate at "Reason" [drink] with, "Fuck your bigoted conservative moral panic, this is (just) about private restrooms that are owed to the public as accommodations."
Reason Magazine, brought to you by WPATH.
"Wyoming Restricts Access to Bathrooms and Other Public Facilities"
It will be hilarious when a big, hairy, burly trans man is forced to use the women's locker room. Is that really what they want?
You sound confused.
Male and female has nothing to do with the presence or absence of a cock, tits, or pussy.
How do sex segregation even make sense?
You sound even more confused.
I know many trans who completely pass for their new gender. Under this law they would have to use the locker room of their DNA sex. It is better to just let them use the locker room of their new gender.
Tell me you don’t have a daughter without saying you don’t have a daughter.
If they can pass as the opposite gender, then they can use the bathroom they always used and if no one notices, then they can continue to use that bathroom. They can do just as they could have done in 1954-- when if a man was caught in the woman's bathroom or changing room, he'd have been dragged downtown as a peeper.
As for women in the men's room, I still maintain, who gives a shit. You wanna stand next to me at the urinal Suzie Q, be my guest, just watch the sprinkles, kay?
"Completely pass for."
Meaning "not."
Nope. Man hands. Dead giveaway. Or are you just pouting because YOU can’t pass? Is that it Tony?
Of course they do. Don't be retarded.
The trannies should stop creating that problem by trying to live their fantasy.
big, hairy, burly trans man
It would be hilarious if Bigfoot used the bathroom too. But, what do these imaginary situations have to do with anything?
And not a single law from the homes of bad laws, Illinois, New York, and California. Minus those, it's an illegitimate and idiotic article presented solely from the liberal-tarians or libertines.
New York also passed a stupid cell phone ban for schools.
Why is it stupid?
7. Prohibiting Gender Transition Treatments for Minors in Kansas
Under the Help Not Harm Act, minors will be restricted from certain gender treatments beginning July 1, after the Legislature successfully overrode Gov. Laura Kelly's (D–Kan.) veto in February. Under the new law, gender transition treatments, including hormone blockers and surgery, are prohibited, and state funds, including Medicaid, cannot be used to pay for these treatments. Providing such treatments is defined under the law as unprofessional conduct, and those who violate the law can have their license revoked and be held strictly liable if sued.
The legislation is meant to protect children "from the irreversible harms of experimental gender transition surgeries and medicines," according to a joint statement from Republican state Reps. Chris Croft, Dan Hawkins, and Blake Carpenter regarding the veto override. But whether these treatments are deemed beneficial or harmful, the practical implication of this new law is that parents now have less authority over the care their children receive.
What is bad about this law?
Hey Autum, do you know who also agrees that transing people is medical malpractice?
Wpath. Internal emails were leaked where the people in the number 1 transing organization said they were committing malpractice. Killnyourself
Groomers gonna groom.
#1 on this list is a silly, performative law that does no good - but it also does no harm. It's no worse than the hundreds of laws setting state birds, plants, crustaceans, etc. And it is not at all "intrusive to local school districts' authority" - they quite literally work for the legislature. I'm not sure this belongs on the list at all. It certainly doesn't belong at #1.
The other thing is . . . there is a legitimate disagreement on what to call it right so it's appropriate for the state to provide guidelines for state functions.
FL should not (and is not) mandating this outside the realm of the state.
It certainly doesn't belong at #1.
I was trying to pretend the list was "in no particular order", but even at that this is pretty dumb. More stupid and less consequential than saying the State shouldn't be able to dictate no smoking in State-owned/Government buildings.
Speaking of dumb, which three states are increasing their minimum wages? Alaska, Oregon and DC are the only jurisdictions listed.
Well, you know that Reason slaps "editor" on just about anyone.
Can I be "assistant comment editor"?
Ok.
1 & 5 seems fine. 7, 8, & 9 I'm happy with - you guys tried to use the government to make it all mandatory, lie in the bed you made.
The author of this complaint form has no problem, obviously with school children using their precious cell phone during class time. Is it any wonder so many young people suffer from ADD. I suppose this author will be complaining about the enforced discipline in the class rooms.
Men pretending to be women do not belong in women's facilities, or women's sports, period.! This mental illness has gone on long enough and it needs to be treated just as it is, a mental illness.
The real violation of rights is forcing everyone to believe and accept their mental illness as normal.
No, we do not have to.
a group it previously protected since 2007
That's some "We have always been at war with Eastasia. The Civil Rights protection ration has been decreased from 20g to 30g." Newspeak right there.
Fuck you Minitrue.
"Iowans can no longer change their sex designation on a birth certificate after undergoing a medical gender transition" -- why is that bad? The whole point of birth certificates is that they're trustworthy because there's no way to change them. Once there is a process to change something, it's much easier to change other things. If it's important to have the government endorse people's self-perceived gender then make some other document to formalize that, but don't touch birth certificates. Haven't we learned from the whole "birtherism" craze?
Whether government should be in the business of endorsing people's self-perceived gender at all is far from clear too. There are many self-perceived things central to people's identity -- e.g. religion -- but that's not normally enough to have the government affirm it and force everyone to affirm it as well.
Reason is all in on this tranny bullshit.
Not only should cell phones be banned from classrooms, so should computers and pads (with some exceptions). The best evidence is that technology has a null to negative impact on learning.
Bullshit. Parents retain just as much authority over the care their children receive. It just recognizes that that authority does not extend to elective body-altering "treatments". It's frankly no different than saying, "No, John Doe's Mom, you may not have John Doe's perfectly healthy legs amputated because little Johnny falsely believes he is a paraplegic nor because you think it would make you a more interesting mother."
Minimum wage going up 35 cents in one state, 45cent in another is about 1-3%, unlikely to keep up with inflation so workers at the end of the year will be poorer because the hike is so minimal.
INcrease unemployment? The studies show this is not the case. For instance in 1966, the same stingy assholds said that enforcing the national minimum wage on African Americans would cause unemployment to rise: in fact, it decreased by 20%.
In 2014, 13 states raise their minimum wages: the result in those state was faster economic growth and more jobs. "New data show that the 13 states that raised the minimum wage this year are adding jobs at a faster pace than those that did not.
State-by-state hiring data released Friday by the Labor Department reveal that in the 13 states that boosted minimum wages at the beginning of this year, the number of jobs grew an average of 0.85 percent from January to June. The average in the other 37 states was 0.61 percent, the Associated Press reports." Time.com
IN some cases in the past, the CBO predicted from zero to 500,000 job losses which 16 million had increased pay and 900,00 were lifted out of poverty.