Iowa Landowners Fight Seizure of Private Property for a Pipeline
The proposed 2,500-mile pipeline would transfer carbon dioxide from ethanol plants in five states to a permanent storage site in North Dakota.

A privately owned company is proposing a pipeline across five states. While some of the state governments appear to be on board, the project is facing backlash from a large and formidable population: property owners.
The pipeline, known as Summit Carbon Solutions, would span 2,500 miles and transport carbon dioxide (CO2) captured at 57 ethanol plants in Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, and the Dakotas to a permanent underground storage site in North Dakota. Construction of the $9 billion pipeline is expected to begin this year, with operations kicking off in 2026.
In June 2024, the project received regulatory approval from the Iowa Utilities Commission, despite landowner protests.
Julie Glade and her husband, Paul, are Iowans who oppose the project because of its use of eminent domain. Their property aligns with the proposed route, and in 2022 the couple was visited by a land agent. "The guy who came to our door wanted us to sit down and sign it without reading it," Glade tells Reason. "They swooped in and tried to contact as many people as possible right away before the people knew what the consequences were. It's very unethical."
Several other landowners in the state share the Glades' worries. During a hearing conducted by the Iowa Utility Commission, landowner Joan Gaul testified against the pipeline, which she said would cross a large portion of her farmland.
Gaul said Summit Carbon Solutions mailed two easements, which would give the pipeline a legal right to her land, to her without notice.
"This letter came telling us about taking our land using eminent domain. It was a difficult pill to swallow," she said. Gaul said she didn't accept the easements and has indicated that she will continue to fight the project.
The Glades visit the Iowa Capitol nearly every week to voice their opposition to the pipeline. They are joined by what the couple calls a diverse coalition united by their concern for the basic constitutional right to land ownership.
"We have MAGA Republicans and we have lefties. We put our differences aside and we work together," she says.
The Glades' efforts could soon pay off. In May the state Senate passed House File 639, which would prevent CO2 pipelines from using eminent domain unless the company proves the pipeline meets the definition of public use. The bill would also prevent CO2 pipelines from operating longer than 25 years. The bill is awaiting the signature of Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds, who is reportedly weighing opinions from pipeline supporters and detractors.
If passed, the bill would represent a significant win for the rights of Iowa property owners. It would also be the latest setback for the Summit Carbon Solutions project. After the company launched a blitz of eminent domain lawsuits in South Dakota, Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden signed a bill into law in March preventing carbon dioxide pipelines from receiving eminent domain permission in the state.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Look, are we going to save the planet or not? Step aside, the climate is being fixed.
Though a bit ironic that the biggest ethanol subsidies base (Iowa) is now having to deal with some of the force they’ve been more then willing to use against others.
That said, end privatized eminent domain. And ethanol subsidies.
I always thought it fair that the government should pay you three times the fair market value in an ED taking. They’re taking someone’s stuff, so why not at least leave a windfall. Likely would also reduce the litigation.
The Vogons may have other plans.
Storing carbon dioxide is stupid. Eminent domain to accomplish it, also stupid.
^THIS! sums up all my thoughts on the matter.
There’s gold in them thar climate scams.
Another reason not to subsidize ethanol.
Big soda is behind this.
The pipeline, known as Summit Carbon Solutions, would span 2,500 miles and transport carbon dioxide (CO2) captured at 57 ethanol plants in Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, and the Dakotas to a permanent underground storage site in North Dakota.
So, a total boondoggle waste of time that does no good to anyone.
Can’t imagine why those property owners might have a problem with that.
At least oil and gas pipelines carry a necessary economic input to be used somewhere for productive use. CO2 is not a pollutant. It never has been, and it never will be. It’s a necessary trace gas that is literally converted into oxygen in the environment, you utter retard.
The Glades visit the Iowa Capitol nearly every week to voice their opposition to the pipeline. They are joined by what the couple calls a diverse coalition united by their concern for the basic constitutional right to land ownership.
“We have MAGA Republicans and we have lefties. We put our differences aside and we work together,” she says.
So, turns out that the lefty green types aren’t so hip on regulating CO2 when it directly effects them.
Gee, it’s almost like they don’t believe it will end the world after all. If they did believe that, wouldn’t they think that their land is a small price to pay for saving the entire planet? If anything, this makes them doubly unethical and doubly retarded.
At least oil and gas pipelines carry a necessary economic input to be used somewhere for productive use. CO2 is not a pollutant. It never has been, and it never will be. It’s a necessary trace gas that is literally converted into oxygen in the environment, you utter retard.
+1 Pipelines for oil and gas, water, and power… roads… all at least bring a direct and tangible benefit to the consumers even if land owners stand in the way. Carbon sequestration doesn’t even do that. Even the assertions of real estate development are assertions of development. Carbon sequestration, OTOH, even if the premise is presumed, the pipeline couldn’t move enough to make a dent. Just shy of straight up “We’re taking your land because our God-King has decreed it to be so.”/FYTW.
I thought ethanol was already green? Was I lied to?
Why not just call it a leftist land grab and money laundering operation and be done with it?
The pipeline, known as Summit Carbon Solutions, would span 2,500 miles and transport carbon dioxide (CO2) captured at 57 ethanol plants in Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, and the Dakotas to a permanent underground storage site in North Dakota.
I think we need to ask Greta about this. Hey… Greta, I have so many questions…. a CO2 pipeline? Also, why is green ethanol producing it? Also, “permanent underground storage site?” So… like literally burying the problem? Greta? Can… can you help us out with this?
Guys, where’s Greta?
How Dare You! Actually Greta burst into flames on her 17th birthday. The Greta on the selfie ship is an imposter.
Greta is gonna get raped in a IDF detention center.
You mean alcohol production yields CO2 as a byproduct? Who woodhave thunk?
As a native Iowa. And current resident, yes, quit with the eminent domain for an at best margins le project. I have heard all kinds of crazy science over it. A big waste of effort.