Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Joe Biden

Biden's Cancer

Plus: That big, beautiful bill; Romanian election results; China's pivot to nuclear; and more...

Liz Wolfe | 5.19.2025 9:37 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Joe Biden and Jill Biden at Pope Francis' funeral |  Francesco Fotia/AGF/Universal Images Group/Newscom
( Francesco Fotia/AGF/Universal Images Group/Newscom)

No more criticizing, say Dems: Former President Joe Biden was diagnosed on Friday with an aggressive form of prostate cancer that has metastasized to the bone. David Axelrod, a Democratic operative, argued on CNN that conversations about Biden's mental acuity "should be more muted and set aside for now as he's struggling through this." He was referring to the discourse around Original Sin, a book by Axios reporter Alex Thompson and CNN anchor Jake Tapper that chronicles the coverup of Biden's mental decline by those around him as he was seeking reelection.

But if anything, the announcement raises more questions. Less than a year ago, Biden's physician claimed he was a "healthy, active, robust 81-year-old male, who remains fit to successfully execute the duties of the Presidency." This already strained credulity for people who noticed his mental decline; it is still more suspicious now, in light of this stage four diagnosis, signs of which were likely present 10 months ago.

Reason Roundup inline form

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The Axelrod line is an attempt to ensure there's never a reckoning. You can be sensitive toward Biden's condition, which is surely very sad for his family, while also trying to uncover which operatives tried to perpetrate a fraud, lying to the American people about the man for whom they were going to be asked to vote. In fact, the two aren't really in tension at all. Which Democratic aides, staffers, and decision makers tried to pull the wool over people's eyes? It's important to suss out how culpable the Bidens were in all this, yes; but the former president doesn't have some long political career ahead of him, whereas some of the people who were complicit in all this might have many decades left.

I truly hope the former President makes a full recovery. I also suspect this was yet another serious lie of omission during his Presidency about his health (& there's ample reason not to give them benefit of doubt). They're using a more sympathetic, smaller lie to deflect from… https://t.co/Zg1Wcw6aID

— Mary Katharine Ham (@mkhammer) May 18, 2025

House budget committee approves the "big, beautiful bill": Yesterday, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R–La.) appears to have convinced the deficit hawks to give up for now and do President Donald Trump's bidding.

Sunday's vote was 17–16, with four Republicans voting present and all Democrats opposed to the measure; the deficit hawks who reversed their stances (voting present instead of no) are Republican Reps. Chip Roy of Texas, Ralph Norman of South Carolina, Andrew Clyde of Georgia, and Josh Brecheen of Oklahoma.

During earlier negotiations, this group had "blocked their own party's sprawling domestic policy measure from advancing out of a key committee on Friday" due to their "fundamentally different view of federal spending and debt than the rest of the G.O.P.," reports The New York Times. "They are single-mindedly focused on slashing deficits by restructuring the government to dramatically scale back social programs, whatever the political consequences." Music to my ears. But that's not what's ultimately going to happen.

It's unclear what concessions were made to win the support of Roy and company, but the Associated Press reports that the bill "permanently extends the existing income tax cuts that were approved during Trump's first term, in 2017 and adds temporary new ones that the president campaigned on in 2024, including no taxes on tips, overtime pay and auto loan interest payments. The measure also proposes big spending increases for border security and defense. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan fiscal watchdog group, estimates that the House bill is shaping up to add roughly $3.3 trillion to the debt over the next decade." In other words: plenty of reason for spending hawks to be concerned.

"If you are an American, you should feel shame that your elected officials are proposing that this is the bill that gets passed," said David Friedberg, on the All In podcast. "That we vaporize this much money, that we put ourselves this much further in debt, that we do not treat the situation as the fiscal emergency that it is."

" We are now burning an additional $2.5T a year adding to our debt load. We are in a fiscal crisis and we're not willing to admit it," he added. "If you look across the board, all of these programs are…being proposed to run at a a cost that's well in excess of their pre-COVID levels." Friedberg said that if he were in charge, he would force spending to remain, at minimum, at pre-COVID levels, not post-, and that no new programs ought to be proposed.


Scenes from New York: A Rwandan man who settled in the Hamptons as a beekeeper allegedly lied to immigration officials when he sought refugee status back in 2003; prosecutors say that he was actually an active participant in the genocide against the Tutsi.


QUICK HITS

  • Related to House GOP infighting: "The US government lost its last triple-A credit score from a major international ratings firm after a downgrade by Moody's Investors Service on May 16, in a bleak milestone for the world's largest economy," reports Bloomberg. "Moody's analysts cited more than a decade of inaction by successive US administrations and Congress to arrest a trend of large fiscal deficits. The government's debt-interest costs ballooned when inflation spiked in the aftermath of Covid-19, and are forecast to reach $1 trillion this year, up from $263 billion in 2017, according to Congress's Government Accountability Office."
  • Someone bombed a Palm Springs fertility clinic, killing one person and injuring four others, in what the FBI called an "intentional act of terrorism." Katherine Dee discusses the bomber's motives here.
  • On Saturday, a Mexican Navy ship crashed into the Brooklyn Bridge, killing two crew members and injuring 22 others. It's possible that there were mechanical issues, or that the tugboat that was assisting it back out of the harbor did not properly guide it; the ship was not supposed to sail toward the bridge, but veered off route.
  • Bucharest's mayor, Nicusor Dan, who is pro–European Union and lefty-centrist, won Romania's presidential election. "George Simion, the leader of the far-right AUR party, won a dramatic first-round victory earlier this month, riding a wave of anger from Romanians who had seen the presidential race annulled late last year because of claims of Russian interference," adds the BBC. Dan defeated Simion in the latest round, winning it all. Simion had stepped in, essentially in place of Calin Georgescu, who had won a first-round presidential victory last year before authorities chalked the result up to "Russian interference" and declared it invalid. Asked by the BBC whether he was merely Georgescu's puppet, Simion said: "The puppets are those who annulled the elections….I am a man of my people and my people voted for Calin Georgescu. Do we like democracy only when the good guy has won? I don't think this is an option." (We spoke about the Romanian elections—and whether the annulment is an assault on democracy—with Matt Taibbi on Just Asking Questions.)

  • This is insane:

China is building nuclear with costs comparable to natural gas plants in the U.S.

$2.3 million per megawatt.

Let that sink in. pic.twitter.com/vOszOdnsOT

— isabelle ???? (@isabelleboemeke) May 18, 2025

  • Fascinated by le privilège du blanc:

Why did Queen Letizia of Spain wear all white in the presence of Pope Leo XIV, while all the other women wore the traditional black? Many media outlets praised the Queen's 'disruptive' all-white style.

They are, unfortunately, ignorant of the tradition of Le privilège du blanc.… pic.twitter.com/5czbpkq3k8

— Dr Taylor Marshall™️ (@TaylorRMarshall) May 18, 2025

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Americans, Especially Women, Feel Less Free. They're Not Wrong.

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Joe BidenBiden AdministrationElection 2024Democratic PartyTrump AdministrationBudgetGovernment SpendingPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (330)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Former President Joe Biden was diagnosed on Friday with an aggressive form of prostate cancer that has metastasized to the bone.

    Best wishes but, yeah, I'm sure there was no indication of this when he was still running.

    1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      I hate that for him. Most men who get prostate cancer die WITH prostate cancer, not of it, even if largely left untreated. To be among the subset that gets the really bad kind of prostate cancer is really bad luck. I do have to wonder how it was missed during all his excellent health checkups?

      1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

        It wasn't missed. It was ignored. There's nothing transparent about the previous administration.

        1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

          How could they ignore it when the prostate cancer was so close to his brain?

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

            Easy. They didn’t need his brain. They needed his autopen signature.

        2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

          Perhaps I should have written

          do have to wonder how it was "missed" during all his excellent health checkups?

          which was my implication all along.

        3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          I disagree. The Biden administration was transparently corrupt. And so were their media allies.

          1. Commenter_XY   2 months ago

            Yes

        4. mad.casual   2 months ago

          Yup.

      2. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

        It is quite possible he had this since the 1980's.

    2. Randy Sax   2 months ago

      Can I be the first one to not say "best wishes"? I'm not wishing death on the man, but I also couldn't give a shit if he dropped dead this second.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

        Likewise. I’ve refrained from commenting on it in other social media with the old axiom about not saying anything if you can’t say something nice.

        1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

          old axiom about not saying anything if you can’t say something nice.

          Is that what it was? My grandma always told me, "If you can't say something nice, say something nasty."

          1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

            If you can't say something nice, you must be talking about a real asshole.

            1. Zeb   2 months ago

              Either that or be a real asshole.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

        Part of me only has sympathy insomuch as this is looking like the most egregious case of elder abuse in the nation's history, all so Choco Jesus could get the shadow presidency he always wanted, while "Dr. Jill" could enjoy the luxuries of being First Lady. I was even calling it that back in 2020 when it was obvious that Biden was a shell of himself.

        He's never had a high intelligence and ran his mouth all the time, and there's even talk that they'd seen this as far back as 2015, but it was clear as crystal that he wasn't fit for office by the time that desiccated shitbag Jim Clyburn came out and endorsed him, with everyone else falling in line within a couple of weeks. Shit, Julian Castro said it right to his face during one of the debates that he wasn't all there.

        1. Sun Wukong   2 months ago

          Every time I want to blame Jill Biden for elder abuse, I remember she was married to the old bastard for decades. Jill no doubt hates his guts, how could she not? She probably rightfully figured she was entitled to some pay back for putting up with him. Joe Biden is the worst person ever to hold high office in the history of this country.

          1. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

            *cough* Bill Clinton, Lyndon Johnson *cough*

            Of course even though Bill and Lyndon were slightly worse persons, they were far more competent.

            1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

              Clinton was a poonhound, but he wasn't an awful President insofar as he generally kept the nation on an economically stable course and our military adventures were mostly police action type of bullshit (although he deserves to get dinged for not taking out Bin Laden after the Cole and Khobar Towers attacks).

              The issue with Bill was really more his power-thirsty wife, not him. If he hadn't married Hillary, he'd probably have remained Governor of Arkansas through Y2K and beyond, and spending most of his time banging luscious Southern honeys.

              I consider LBJ to be the worst President in US history, even more than Wilson or Buchanan (at least FDR recognized that the devil finds work for idle hands and focused on jobs programs during the Depression, even if they ultimately didn't bring it to an end). His toxic "guns and butter" administrative policies epitomize the utopian thinking of the American left after Wilson took charge.

              1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                Yeah, LBJ gave us the toxic hybrid of race-centered mercenary politics of the South and (then) new-age welfare state socialism of progressive Democrats.

                1. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

                  Sun Wukong said "Joe Biden is the worst person", not 'worst president'.

                  Bill and LJB were both far more personally murderous and evil, even if they were more competent at their job.

              2. Sun Wukong   2 months ago

                There were worse Presidents, but no one was a worse person than Biden. LBJ never showered with his daughters.

                1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

                  But he did lift up dogs by their ears.

                2. Zeb   2 months ago

                  I really don't care much if presidents are terrible people in their personal lives. Anyone who can get to that position without losing it must be some kind of psycho. If one made a real effort to significantly cut government spending and relieve regulatory and tax burdens and keep us out of pointless wars, I would put up with a lot of questionable behavior.

                  1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

                    Sounds a lot like Trump.

                    It's amusing how Americans will ignore the warts of their candidates as long as the politics are aligned.

                    1. Zeb   2 months ago

                      Pretty much. I'm hardly a Trump booster, but I probably sound like one to some of my lefty friends and family. My response (when I bother) to people pointing out how Trump is a bad person in whatever way (some of which I agree with) is just to ask where the decent, competent, consistent and effective alternative was? Especially in 2024. Someone who was just going to be a normal, boring, competent president was just not in the cards.

              3. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

                ""he'd probably have remained Governor of Arkansas through Y2K and beyond,""

                Term limits said no.

                Interesting, AR's gov term limit is two consecutive terms. Bill won, people didn't like him. He lost to Frank White on the next election who people hated more, then reelected Bill twice.

                1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

                  They would have grandfathered him in. The only reason the referendum went through was because he ran for President.

              4. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

                "Clinton was a poonhound, but he wasn't an awful President "

                Clinton and LBJ were worse people than Biden. As far as I'm aware, Biden didn't have inconvenient people executed. Those two did. A lot of people died on their orders.
                Don't get me wrong, Biden was a child molesting con man, but he wasn't smart enough to be as evil as LBJ and Clinton. His death toll didn't hold a candle to the other two.

        2. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

          Biden was a shell of himself.

          I'm pretty sure he was declared "past his prime" immediately after being born.

          1. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

            Biden's birth year was closer to the Lincoln presidency, than it was to his own presidency.

        3. Randy Sax   2 months ago

          And they're still trotting his dying ass out there to give speeches for millions in donor money.

      3. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

        He is a corrupt traitorous pedofile. This is less than he deserves

    3. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      I mean he did say he had cancer in 2022 which the media blamed on a stutter.

      1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        Hah, I had forgotten about that.

    4. BYODB   2 months ago

      Yeah, it's not believable that they didn't know this earlier given Presidential health checkups and his age.

      It's a bit sad he probably won't be able to enjoy his final years outside the public eye, but then that's what he choose too.

    5. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      On a related note:

      Author and “Dilbert” creator Scott Adams announced on Monday that he was diagnosed with terminal prostate cancer and is not expected to live past this summer.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Less than a year ago, Biden's physician claimed he was a "healthy, active, robust 81-year-old male, who remains fit to successfully execute the duties of the Presidency."

    ...or else.

    1. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

      HEALTHY ACTIVE MEN DON'T HAVE STUTTERS.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

        King George VI (who managed it well) says differently.

        1. Wizzle Bizzle   2 months ago

          D-d-d-does he?

    2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      Seeing as Trump getting shot was announced as loud noises causes SS to intervene, how would they cover this for trump?

      1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

        A shard of glass bounced off his prostate?

    3. Longtobefree   2 months ago

      So when does that quack lose his license?

      1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        Haha, funny.

    4. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

      Does the physician lying about that, in order to help Biden win the election (as he was still running when the doctor made that claim), count as election interference? I would say it doesn't, but there was this one obscure case in the last couple years where a guy was convicted of 34 felonies, premised *in part on the defendant trying to influence an election.

      *or not in part, as the jury could just pick and choose anything in order to find the defendant guilty of felonies instead of misdemeanors

  3. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    David Axelrod, a Democratic operative, argued on CNN that conversations about Biden's mental acuity "should be more muted and set aside for now as he's struggling through this."

    After which let's all agree to a general amnesty on lying about who was running the country.

    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      The dems say similar shit when the right's attention is turned to some pol's kid. Then completely butcher republican children in the next breath.

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

      Axelrod couldn't have made it more obvious that the announcement is an effort to get the attention off of whose hands were up Biden's ass and using him as a meat puppet, than if he held up a huge neon sign saying "Nothing to see here, move along."

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Given the recent shenanigans of the DNC-media, what are the odds that Biden's cancer diagnosis is all or part bullshit?

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

        Probably about 25%, to be honest. Biden is old as shit and him getting prostate cancer isn't all that out of the realm of probability, especially with that kind of cancer becoming increasingly prevalent after the clot shot.

    4. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

      It's this similar to the classic dem strategy. Claim it doesn't exist, and then when it is undeniable claim it's old news and we are not going to look back.

    5. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      Facts changed!

  4. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    The measure also proposes big spending increases for border security and defense.

    I don't suppose cutting the ivy league school endowments will offset any of this. (Not that that is apparently really going to happen anyway.)

    1. damikesc   2 months ago

      I like temporary increases to deport people is the same to Reason as continuous ongoing payments to illegals.

  5. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    "should be more muted and set aside for now as he's struggling through this"

    Now who sounds like Hur?

    "You can be sensitive toward Biden's condition, which is surely very sad for his family, while also trying to uncover which operatives tried to perpetrate a fraud, lying to the American people about the man for whom they were going to be asked to vote."

    THIS.

    1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

      "should be more muted"

      Maybe sarc can get hired on as a consultant...

      1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

        If so, they won’t post a list.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    "That we vaporize this much money, that we put ourselves this much further in debt, that we do not treat the situation as the fiscal emergency that it is."

    Maybe someone can inform Trump that all of the federal government is against him so he should start slashing out of spite.

    1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

      How would that be any different from what he's already been doing?

      1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

        Poor sarc.

      2. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

        Remember when you used to copy-paste "fuck you, cut spending"?

        1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

          Pepperidge Farm remembers.

        2. Sun Wukong   2 months ago

          I think the real "sarcasmic" died in an auto accident or something around 2015 and the handle has since been used by the Shreek franchise.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

            That would explain a lot.

          2. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

            the real "sarcasmic" died in an auto accident

            That or Tulpa drove him into an insane asylum.

            1. Sun Wukong   2 months ago

              He was kind of a troubled guy. It just seemed like the kind of guy who got hit in the road walking home drunk one night or was just getting his life together only to be killed by a drunk driver or something. I bet this isn't the same person and is just some leftist piece of shit who stole his screen name.

      3. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        You've defended all the judges ordering hundreds of billions in dispersement of dollars lol.

  7. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

    A more true headline: Asshole Joe Biden being attacked by Joe Biden's asshole.

    I wonder how long it will be before it's blamed on Trump?

    1. Randy Sax   2 months ago

      JD Vance is wrong about Biden's asshole.

    2. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      Biden's cancer is from climate change. It's the GOP's fault, not just Trump.

      1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

        I blame the raccoon dogs.

        1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          If we just released some genetically modified mosquitos with some RNA the cancer would not have happened.

          1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

            More testing needed!

            1. Eeyore   2 months ago

              I'm sure he is now behind on his jab schedule and should prioritize getting up to date.

      2. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

        Does anyone else remember a couple years ago when Biden was giving a speech about the environment, and how in DE he'd get oil slick on the windshield? He dropped the bomb that it gave him cancer. Immediately afterwards the White House came out saying that Biden misspoke, and he doesn't have cancer.

        Now I'm wondering if Biden really did have the cancer then (perhaps diagnosed even earlier than that speech, or at least right before that speech) and Biden's mush brain just let the cat out of the bag.

  8. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    "Reps. Chip Roy of Texas"

    During the whole last Speakership debacle, Chip Roy was among the vote-getting leaders for a long time. Wishing he had won...

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

      The biggest issue the Congressional Republicans have is that no one really has the combination of public profile and fundraising power that Pelosi displayed during most of the last 25 years. The last person with that kind of Q rating was probably Gingrich.

  9. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    A Rwandan man who settled in the Hamptons as a beekeeper allegedly lied to immigration officials when he sought refugee status back in 2003; prosecutors say that he was actually an active participant in the genocide against the Tutsi.

    Is this another cause célèbre that I need to steel myself for? Are we going to be writing about this for the next few months?

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

      We still go after former Nazis who lied to get here. What makes this guy any different?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Skin color. Duh.

        1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

          It’s the most important thing.

      2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        Did Bad Orange Man go after Nazis?

        1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

          He did threaten to stop funding the ukraine

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

            But those are our Nazis.

            1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

              There are good Nazis on both sides.

    2. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

      Marylan father is out, NY beekeeper is in

    3. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

      prosecutors say that he was actually an active participant in the genocide against the Tutsi.

      His Tutsi role was genocide?

      1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

        +1

      2. Ersatz   2 months ago

        genocide flavored

    4. mad.casual   2 months ago

      No.

      Like the 10 yr. old rape victim, this story only has a few inches of explorable depth before your average person starts asking questions like, "So a bunch of black Africans colonized the region and started genociding the indigenous Tutsi?"

      At which point, everyone either goes through the elaborate history of African Tribal warfare for the last 5K yrs. *or* changes the subject.

      1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        Yeah, now is NOT the time to be discussing genocide in Africa.

      2. Zeb   2 months ago

        You omit the Belgian king's influence. People love to go on about that too.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

          Rwanda was a British colony.

          1. Zeb   2 months ago

            No it wasn't. It was German and then Belgian. The Belgians did a lot to enforce the Hutu/Tutsi distinction and were the colonial power from after WWI until independence.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

              Thanks, I was mistaken. For some reason I thought it went to the British as a mandate.

            2. Square = Circle   2 months ago

              The Belgians did a lot to enforce the Hutu/Tutsi distinction

              ^

              They actually raised up the Tutsi minority over the Hutu majority because the Tutsi have an almost Indian look while the Hutu look more like West Africans, leading Belgian phrenologists to conclude that the Tutsi were a somewhat superior race to the Hutu and were capable of being clerks, in contrast to Hutu who were regarded as only capable of manual labor.

              The resentment of the Hutu persists to present times.

  10. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

    You can be sensitive toward Biden's condition

    Or not; Karma's* a bitch. Hopefully he gets pumped full of all the experimental drugs he wants and they don't work.

    *I understand most Hindu/Buddhist teachings ain't this.

    1. Longtobefree   2 months ago

      Yet another example why we shouldn't depend on wind power!

  11. Randy Sax   2 months ago

    Mexican Navy ship crashed

    Mexico has a navy? There's no lawns to mow in the ocean.

    1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

      It’s a food boat.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

        A giant taco salad.

        1. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

          Wonder how many illegals were stowed below?

    2. Public Entelectual   2 months ago

      I did an iPhone video frame analysis of the speed of the Brooklyn Bridge impact, using the 25 meter mast spacing of the Goast Guard barque I sailed into the same dock in OpSail '76.

      The 4+ knot result greatly exceeded the nearly slack tidal current, suggesting Cuauhtemoc's aging engine transmission got stuck in reverse. A NY harbor pilot was aboard,

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Gender?

        1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

          Xwer / Hazerach.

        2. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

          Skin color?

      2. Randy Sax   2 months ago

        How long did it take to hit? No call to "get away from the masts, hide below"?

        1. BYODB   2 months ago

          Yeah, that was my question as well. It seems at least one of people killed was a naval cadet and it seems this was at least partially, if not entirely, a training vessel so perhaps we shouldn't be surprised. Especially given Mexico's 'navy'.

          I mean, it was a sail ship. That says a lot.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

            Even the USCG puts cadets on sailing ships to learn the basics of seamanship.

            1. BYODB   2 months ago

              True, but at the same time a cadet might not have the presence of mind to get to the deck when they're about to hit a bridge. I'm assuming she was a spotter on top of a mast or something.

      3. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

        "I did an iPhone video frame analysis of the speed of the Brooklyn Bridge impact"

        No you didn't.

        1. Public Entelectual   2 months ago

          Foremast 24 meters forward of the main folded ~7 seconds after the main topmast .
          Do the math.

          1. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

            Maybe so, but I'm still saying you didn't do an 'iPhone video frame analysis'.

            1. Public Entelectual   2 months ago

              Your words frequently do not mean what you think they do.

              What do you call counting frames on an iPhone video to time the interval between two events?

              1. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

                I quoted you exactly, you fucking retard. Those are your own words, copied and pasted. You don't even manage to remember the bullshit lies you type just a few hours later.

                1. Public Entelectual   2 months ago

                  Keep digging.

      4. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

        Which type of harbor pilot seems to be the question. There’s harbor pilots and docking pilots in New York. One is to get in and out of the harbor. The other is a tugboat company employee to get in and out of the berth.

        1. Public Entelectual   2 months ago

          Harbor , it seems, as they flew the ' Pilot Aboard " H " flag throughout the evolution, and were not under sail.

    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

      I'd honestly like to know what the fuck a Mexican Navy ship was doing in New York in the first place.

      1. Randy Sax   2 months ago

        Can we officially call it "an invasion" now?

      2. mad.casual   2 months ago

        After they changed the sign to "Gulf of America" they had to park it somewhere else.

      3. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

        It was on a global goodwill tour and setting sail for Iceland. Let’s be honest, people like seeing tall ships.

        1. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

          I do. I've never been on one that wasn't a display, but I would like to do a daytrip on a calm day on one.

          1. Public Entelectual   2 months ago

            " I would like to do a daytrip on a calm day on one."

            That could be a rather long day.

            https://x.com/RussellSeitz/status/1924301391868149961

      4. Public Entelectual   2 months ago

        Their Armada wants to rediscover Gulf of Vespucci so they can rename it The Gulf of Mexico at America's Semiquinceria Party next year.

    4. Ersatz   2 months ago

      isnt that where they plant all those offshore wind turbines?

  12. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Moody's analysts cited more than a decade of inaction by successive US administrations and Congress to arrest a trend of large fiscal deficits.

    This is transphobic.

  13. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Someone bombed a Palm Springs fertility clinic, killing one person and injuring four others, in what the FBI called an "intentional act of terrorism."

    We shan't speak of this again.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

      Given that the perpetrator was anti-pro-life and anti-natalism, this story will be memory-holed before you can blink.

      1. BYODB   2 months ago

        Yeah, that's what I'm assuming too.

        If it was a pro-life bomber we'd never hear the end of it, although it would be pretty ironic for someone to be pro-life then bomb an abortion clinic.

    2. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

      Somehow, yet again, this won't count in the next left vs right terrorism stats.

    3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      Syrian "asylum seeker" on the run from deportation enforcement goes on stabbing rampage...at least the 8th similar incident in Germany this year alone.

      https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/05/18/bielefeld-revellers-attacked-outside-a-bar-police-classify-the-offence-as-planned-assault

      According to witnesses, the perpetrator attacked his victims indiscriminately with a knife and a cane sword. Footage from the crime scene shows forensics securing a weapon - a walking stick with a retractable blade.

      Other guests overpowered the attacker and inflicted facial injuries in the process. Nevertheless, he managed to break away and flee on foot. He left a rucksack at the scene of the crime.

      Investigators from the "Kurfürst" homicide squad, led by First Chief Inspector Markus Mertens, recovered the rucksack from the area around the crime scene. According to BILD, it contained further weapons, a bottle of flammable liquid and a residence permit issued to a Syrian national. According to the newspaper, the police are currently categorising the attack as a premeditated assault.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        In Britain he would get a cultural achievement award.

      2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        Cultural knife fight.

      3. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        Yeah but he makes the most delicious Syrian food in his truck.

        1. Public Entelectual   2 months ago

          it takes a real artist to slice shawarma with a sword cane while lighting a molotov cocktail.

    4. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

      based on the shooter's writings, there are probably a few super specific and terrible sub reddits that lost a mod today

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

        Reddit Lies on X might be able to tell us.

        1. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

          He sounds exactly like Buttplug, Jeff, Nelson/KAR:

          Meet "IndictEvolution," the likely online persona of the alleged fertility clinic suicide bomber.

          IndictEvolution was not a "right-wing Christian", rather he believed in a niche secular philosophy called "Efilism" which calls for extinction of all life to eliminate suffering.

          Quote: "I just wanted to say, you're god definitely doesn't exist, but if he did I'd choose satan" over your evil god. Did you ever think that the bible is mainly just slander against satan, and that satan just realized what a creep your god is???"

          The ideology of Efilism has roots in antinatalism (which believes procreation is a fundamental evil) but goes a step beyond, calling for the mass extinction of all life on Earth.

          The core value of this ideology is the hyper-rationalization of "nothing consents to existence"

          In the weeks leading up to the bombing, IndictEvolution was making posts discussing fabricating bombs on a website called "SanctionedSuicide"

          Pro-extinction communities on reddit and other platforms that are predicated on secular hatred for life have now spurred multiple violent attacks.

          This marks the birth of an anti-religion hyper-rational anti-human death cult.

          People need to realize this is the same ideology that motivated the Sandy Hook killer too. He specifically name-dropped Inmendham, the guy who coined this ideology, in one of his old YouTube videos. This is one of the most dangerous leftwing nihilist ideas and yet it's promoted.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

            Just. Fucking. Wow.

            I really hate when I’m right.

          2. BYODB   2 months ago


            The core value of this ideology is the hyper-rationalization of "nothing consents to existence"

            Of course, this is obvious bullshit since lots of life forms are able to kill themselves. The fact they don't equals consent.

            Also, if they are hung up on consent, do the things or people they kill consent to death?

    5. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

      Oh the anti-humanity!

  14. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    " including no taxes on tips, overtime pay and auto loan interest payments"

    While I say fuck you cut spending, and taxes are theft...to single these out for special treatment is a HORRIBLE idea, and will ultimately lead to huge increases in the tax code so as to define who may or may not be paid in tips, who may get overtime pay that is not taxed, and subsidizes auto loans (why?), which will be abused and require more pages of tax code to define what is and is not a valid auto loan that comprises interest that need not taxed (e.g., loans on Bentleys not taxed?).

    A broader change, e.g., even larger standard deduction would have covered those at the lower end on the income scale being paid in tips AND everyone else. Why are tipped workers the only ones getting new tax relief?

    And increasing SALT limits just bails out those high-tax blue states to allow them to never face any pressure from their own citizens to lower the tax burden.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Flat tax with no deductions.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        That's almost as bad as the current income tax.

        Whenever taxation is discussed, someone inevitably will posit "What we need is a 10% flat tax on all income, no exclusions, no deductions..." or a close facsimile of this statement.

        A “flat tax” sounds nice. All your income taxed at one flat rate. What could be simpler? But a flat tax simply removes the progressive structure (different rates for different income levels and/or types of income). This has two problems. First, much of the tax code exists simply to define what constitutes "income". Second, if anything is deductible, such as charitable donations, then much of the tax code will continue to be required to define exactly how this should work. Mountains of paperwork and 10s of thousands of pages of tax code will be involved in defining what is deductible, etc. just as it does today. Armies of accountants and attorneys and IRS agents will remain in place.

        If you want to say "All income is taxable income, no deductions" that's fine. But it probably won't work.

        The current tax code recognizes that not every penny that lands in your pocket represents "income". For pretty good reasons, the tax code endeavors to distinguish between gross income, net income (adjusted gross income) and taxable income (AGI less deductions).

        As an example, if every penny that lands in your hands is taxable, then when Grandma gives little Johnny a birthday card with $10 in it, Johnny must file a tax return and account for that $10, and Grandma may be required to file a correspond 1099MISC to document that she transferred monies to Johnny. Failure to do so on either party's part obviously is tax evasion and a clear failure to comply with the tax code. If this situation is undesirable, then exclusions must be written and further, the definition of “gift” must be codified so as to avoid certain abuses that would inevitably occur.

        Now consider the nature of a gift exclusion that allows small amounts to be gifted without a need to report as income on the part of the recipient (or file a 1099MISC). First, how small is small? $10, $100, $1000, is that indexed to inflation? Can Grandma give $1000 *and* Grandpa give $1000 each? How often can a gift be given? Or is the limit a cumulative annual amount? If it's $10, then lots of people will have to file 1099 and cause way more work than it's worth. If it's $1000, a lot of people will start black-marketing "gifts": e.g. maybe I can convince my boss to "gift" me the maximum amount every year? Etc. Etc.

        1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

          If I loaned $750 to someone, who paid me back $1000 (i.e. repay $750 and pay $250 in interest), the $1000 check is not all income to me right? Income in this case would be $250, the interest paid, the other $750 is simply returning my money. What if I loaned my brother $5000, with a contract, interest payment and everything, then 5 years later decide that he doesn't have to pay it back? Is that a gift? Have I violated the gifting rules? Is that loan income to him? Is it a loss for me? Can I use it to offset other income? Etc. Etc.

          If my house burns down and the insurance company writes me a check for $100,000 is that income? What if the insurance pays more than I paid for the house? But what if it pays less than the house is worth?

          More rules will be needed to clarify these situations too. That’s just defining “income”…and those are the easy examples.

          Unless you really mean a flat tax applies to all income regardless of source and nothing is deductible, then defining the various things that constitute gross income, net income, and taxable income will consume a large portion of the tax code and will continue to chew us up in compliance overhead. Futher even if you do mean all income, including Grandma's $10 gift to little Johnny bear in mind the thousands of 1099MISC forms that will need to be filed.

          The benefit of a “flat tax” in this situation is negligible.

        2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          Almost as bad is still better.

          And sure, tax all income of all kinds. As for 5 year-old Johnny, I doubt the IRS will target him for $100 birthday gifts.

          1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

            I doubt the IRS will target him for $100 birthday gifts.

            I do not share your optimism.

          2. BYODB   2 months ago

            Well, in that imagined future utopia cash won't exist and the tax will automatically be applied to all money transfers including little Johnny's birthday money.

          3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

            The only things "flat tax" does is change the calculations from:

            "If your income is greater than $A and less then $B, then your tax is $X plus %Y times the amount over $A", for about 7 values of A and B.

            The replacement is simply "Your tax is Y% times your income". So Replacing a simple lookup and very simple equation with one somewhat simpler equation. Which is already done by your local tax prep software so you don't even have to do the lookup or the math. Or, for the stupid people, there's the lookup table: https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i1040tt--2024.pdf, so no math.

            The ENTIRE rest of the tax code remains, or gets markedly worse due to the "no deductions, no exclusions" which damn sure means Johnny's birthday gift is taxable income that must be reported and traced.

      2. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

        The is no political value in a flat tax. You can't have people "Lobby" politicians to make exceptions in the law for them.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          True. Then why even bother with "democracy"?

    2. Zeb   2 months ago

      Seriously, enough of this silly nonsense. Raise the deduction, cut rates and cut spending. No more using tax code to give out special favors. Unless we can all just start calling our income tips now.

      1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

        New rules for sex workers:
        Just the tip.

      2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        That's what the Trump tax cuts extension do. It doubles the prior standard deduction.

        Yet more often than not that extension is being discussed as a cost.

      3. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

        ""to give out special favors""

        This is the political way.

  15. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    It's possible that there were mechanical issues, or that the tugboat that was assisting it back out of the harbor did not properly guide it; the ship was not supposed to sail toward the bridge, but veered off route.

    The most boring theories.

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

      I've it on good authority* that the Trump admin gave them bad details so Trump could send this tweet:

      NO MEXICANS CAN ENTER THIS COUNTRY TILL THEY ADAPT THE IMPERIAL SYSTEM!

      *I just made it up.

      1. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

        Anonymous sources, am I right?

      2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        You can just write "anonymous sources within the Administration".

        1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

          “People familiar with the matter”.

      3. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

        Misses the mark by about two meters.

      4. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        We need to stop all Mexicans from entering the country until we figure out what the hell is going on with their large mast sailing ships!

    2. Ajsloss   2 months ago

      Would it be too racist to blame a certain wet____ market?

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Did they get confused with the Gulf of Brooklyn?

  16. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    In you can't hate media enough...

    Media says yes they could have done better exposing Joe Bidens cognitive issues... but they think their real scandal isn't going hard enough on Trump.

    https://legalinsurrection.com/2025/05/media-hot-take-the-real-scandal-was-the-msms-failure-to-stop-trumps-reelection/

    1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

      Because controlling elections is really their job.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

        They're still deluding themselves that their credibility hasn't been completely shot to hell from 2020 onward. That's why all these "we in the media are crucial to holding the powerful accountable" chest-puffing, onanistic puff pieces coming out lately are such a joke. Where the fuck have they been for the last five years other than running interference for their fellow Democrats?

      2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Be fair. They seek only to control public opinion and action. How people vote is up to chance.

    2. Zeb   2 months ago

      They just needed to call him a nazi a few more times and I'm sure it would have worked.

    3. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

      I like when they claim they were just saying what the Biden admiration was telling them. As if it's not a jouralist's job to ask questions. They are basically outing themselves as dem propagandists with that excuse.

    4. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

      Straight from the horse's mouth ass.

      1. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

        https://x.com/BuckSexton/status/1924179165261029580

  17. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    Joe Bidens job number revised down AGAIN. By another 400k.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/did-biden-admin-fudge-jobs-numbers-election-labor-dept-report-raises-questions

    1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

      We can’t talk about it because cancer.

      1. mad.casual   2 months ago

        What if we cache it in double-plus good thinkspeak?

        Like the outcome we hope for his cancer, Joe's job numbers are revealed to be in remission! Again!

    2. DesigNate   2 months ago

      But what about Trumps numbers!!!!! - sarc

  18. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

    The Axelrod line is an attempt to ensure there's never a reckoning.

    Which why there needs to be a reckoning. There needs to be a reckoning like there’s never been before. All of these assholes need to be brought up on subpoenas before Congress and maybe even charged by the DOJ. They damn well knew of Biden’s cancer and mental acuity in 2020. For Pete’s sake, it’s obvious the man even suffers from under treated Parkinson’s disease. Axelrod and his cohorts who perpetrated this should be rotting in a federal prison.

    1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      “subpoenas before Congress”

      Wouldn’t amount to anything.

      “maybe even charged by the DOJ.”

      That would be wonderful, I’m not holding my breath.

  19. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    Plans to use the Qatari jeft for Air Force One due to Boeing delays started under Biden.

    https://legalinsurrection.com/2025/05/sen-mullin-using-qatari-jet-as-temp-replacement-for-air-force-one-started-under-biden/

    1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

      Have you considered that facts may have changed?

      1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

        Democrats did it first, so it’s ok.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

          Isn’t that Sarc’s line?

          1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

            He won’t know I stole it because I’m “muted”.

            1. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

              The nice part is when you back him into a corner, but he can't reply because he's pretending that your muted, so he replies to someone else with a bunch of angry allusions to something he supposedly can't see.

              1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                One of my favorites. He did that in the prior thread.

              2. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

                When he really can't contain himself, he resorts to "the browser logged me out, so I was forced read your trump-loving drivel!"

            2. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

              Sarcastrated secret super power revealed.
              https://www.flickr.com/photos/66890686@N02/51100766405/in/dateposted-public/

              1. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

                He bought his crystal ball from the same shop.

      2. Sun Wukong   2 months ago

        Yes. When Trump does it, it is the worstest thing ever. We already knew that dumb ass.

      3. Zeb   2 months ago

        Well, facts have changed. Trump is president now.

  20. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Bucharest's mayor, Nicusor Dan, who is pro–European Union and lefty-centrist, won Romania's presidential election. "George Simion, the leader of the far-right AUR party, won a dramatic first-round victory earlier this month..."

    No "Russian interference" this time, I'm sure.

    1. Sun Wukong   2 months ago

      "He is a left centrist". Has there ever been a more mendacious term than "lefty centrist". There are no centrists on the left. There are just species of fanatical lunatics.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

        "Independents," in my experience, tend to be leftists who will vote for Democrats but don't want their mailbox stuffed with party flyers.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

      More like EUSSR interference.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

        Europe's politics since WW2 seems to confirm that they didn't have a problem with communism, just with Russia specifically. Which tends to confirm that if Hitler hadn't stupidly violated Molotov-Ribbentrop, the commies probably would have been working towards the fall of Britain instead.

  21. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    The demographics survey data on inflation belief is hilarious. Democrats are solely responsible for the bad numbers on estimates of inflation for the next 5 years.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/umich-sentiment-collapses-near-45-year-record-lows-democrats-inflation-dissonance

    1. BYODB   2 months ago

      As expected from idiotic survey data.

  22. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    China is building nuclear with costs comparable to natural gas plants in the U.S.

    A reverse China Syndrome is on its way.

    1. BYODB   2 months ago

      On the one hand, I don't believe China's numbers in really any circumstances.

      On the other hand, we should probably do that ourselves. I saw that OpenAI is opening data centers around the world, and at least one of them in Abu Dhabi is estimated to require 5-gigawatts of power which, notably, will require nuclear power. Several installations, actually.

      No wonder they aren't building them here.

      These AI companies might manage something no one else has managed to do: reform nuclear power in the U.S.

      Microsoft reopening 3 mile island to the overwhelming sound of crickets was an absolute fucking shock to me. I don't have a problem with that, but what astounds me is no one is being given a microphone that is against it. Normally the media falls all over themselves to get negative reactions to that kind of story.

    2. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 months ago

      Don't they call it the United States Syndrome in China?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        When little kids in China try to dig a hole all the way through the earth, where do they think they will end up?

        1. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 months ago

          My backyard?

        2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

          FREEDOM!

  23. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    Another inferior court judge stopped by appeals. This one regarding Trump dissolving public employee unions for areas considered a security interest.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2025/05/16/appeals-court-federal-worker-unions-00355375

  24. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    As the media plays the Trump is racist game for 57 white refugees from south africa... administration points out they've given refugee status to over 8600 people since January 20th.

    Imagine. Using the refugee program for directed uses and not broad base violations of immigration laws.

    Post

    See new posts
    Conversation
    Gunther Eagleman™
    @GuntherEagleman
    Watching
    @TriciaOhio
    deliver one hell of a master class to a nobody CNN host made me smile.

    "We have granted asylum to 8666 individuals since January 20th, regardless of color or creed."

    "It is, quite frankly, disturbing to me that members of the media, including people who are on this very network, are trying to whitewash the facts and whitewash the fact that these individuals have faced discrimination, racial violence, the seizure of their land based on nothing but their skin color alone."

    "This is the United States of America, a land of opportunity, and we will help those who are facing persecution from the government of South Africa."

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

      It’s bad because Trump isn’t flooding the country with faux refugees to cause disruption and vote for Democrats.

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

      Nice to see the administration calling out that shithole government specifically.

      Wonder if the "center-right" would support the Boers breaking off from the communist ANC and given military equipment to resist being brought back under their orbit.

      1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

        Apartheid!!! I can hear it already.

        The western media would support genocidal communist blacks before the Boers. Skin color after all. And colonialism.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

          Wouldn’t be the first time. See Rhodesia for more.

    3. mad.casual   2 months ago

      "This is the United States of America, a land of opportunity, and we will help those who are facing persecution from the government of South Africa."

      On that sentiment, I give my up front endorsement to a race-swapped remake of Lethal Weapon 2 with Mel Gibson as Sgt. Murtaugh and Danny Glover as Sgt. Riggs.

      1. BYODB   2 months ago

        Mel is only allowed to play villains now (and he's damn good at it, despite his gross personality the man can act).

        Glover is...doing whatever the hell he wants I suppose. He's still in things, although not as a major cast member anymore. Which is kind of a shame since he too is a pretty good actor. He was never a Denzel though.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

          Mel is only allowed to play villains now (and he's damn good at it, despite his gross personality the man can act).

          He's a hell of a director, too. Anything he's done has been must-watch for me, although I didn't get a chance to catch Flight Risk in the theaters.

          1. BYODB   2 months ago

            I liked him as the villain in Boss Level even though it was an action comedy that riffed off of Groundhog Day. It was certainly better than the Tom Cruise led Edge of Tomorrow, but then that wasn't intended to be funny either.

      2. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

        “Diplomatic immunity.”

    4. BYODB   2 months ago

      Remember when Obama praised the government of South Africa under Mandela? Whoops.

  25. Sun Wukong   2 months ago

    Adam Conover might be the biggest douche bag in the universe. Christ what a smug, lying asshole.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIpFcBABojo

    1. Randy Sax   2 months ago

      He still believes the "Fine people on both sides" narrative. He also got shreked on Rogan a number of years ago.

      1. Sun Wukong   2 months ago

        When confronted with the proof otherwise, his response is "I don't know because I don't share your obsessions with Trump". I really wouldn't have blamed the guy interviewing Conover if he had just beaten the living shit out him.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

          He's no different than other passive-aggressive left-wing dickhead like Vaush, Destiny, or Hasan Piker. It's all about what serves the marxist revolution, not reality.

        2. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

          Also, Tim Pool is way too high-strung to bring a douchebag like Conover on without it devolving into a farce. Watch the Rogan podcast with Conover to see how you deal with disingenuous vermin like him.

          1. Sun Wukong   2 months ago

            Vermin is a good way to describe those people. You can't hold them in enough contempt.

          2. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

            The Rogan interview was really fantastic because it shows truly how little pushback these people are used to getting.

            To be able to say with such clarity that "ya, of course its a good thing to give kids hormones" and then see his sheer surprise at Rogan, who I am sure he considers to be leagues below him intellectually, to just give him the consistent and sane pushback of "the stuff you are saying is ridiculous" and offer a bunch of examples of how is position isnt rooted in any sort of common sense.

            Truly, the product of the blue bubble.

            1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

              Rogan wasn't even confrontational--all he's doing is asking Conover in a very anodyne manner to verify his sources and explain why he believes the policies he's pushing. And Conover later said it was the "most exhausting" interview he's ever done, because he spent so much energy trying to gaslight Rogan and utterly failing.

              Pool isn't equipped to interview someone like that, because he doesn't understand that people like Conover are propagandists at their core, and thus liars at the very foundation of their biological makeup.

    2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      Conover had no actual facts he knew of. Any time Tim tried to get Adam to use facts he would say, that's my assumption I don't have the facts on me. He sued appeals to emotion, appeals to his own ignorance, then attacked Tim when Tim pointed out his hypocrisy.

      It was like an hour long debate with jeffsarc.

    3. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

      Conover is a perfect avatar for the ultra smug 'highly educated' (with shitty non useful degrees) who cant debate because they truly dont actually know much of anything outside of what amounts to church orthodoxy.

      These people thought, with full conviction:

      Covid definitely came from a wet market
      1000s of children were on ventilators during COVID
      Healthy children, teens, 20 somethings absolutely needed the jab
      If you got the jab, you wouldn't get or spread COVID
      Little boys can and should be transed to little girls
      Trump said Nazis were fine people
      Racial hate crimes are rampant and happening everywhere

      They are just the modern clergy of an observably silly relogion detached from reality

    4. BYODB   2 months ago

      He was an insufferable asshole on his own show, so you know he's way worse than that in other venues.

  26. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

    including no taxes on tips, overtime pay and auto loan interest payments.

    Stupid gimmicks over Medicaid reductions; slaps face. Need to cut spending.

  27. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    During earlier negotiations, this group had "blocked their own party's sprawling domestic policy measure from advancing out of a key committee on Friday" due to their "fundamentally different view of federal spending and debt than the rest of the G.O.P.," reports The New York Times. "They are single-mindedly focused on slashing deficits by restructuring the government to dramatically scale back social programs, whatever the political consequences." Music to my ears. But that's not what's ultimately going to happen.

    Don't buy it. Chip Roy is apparently one of the people holding up the recission bill for cuts that DOGE has highlighted as well.

    He is seemingly doing everything he can to not get a single penny cut while claiming he wants cuts.

    1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

      This is known as the sarc method.

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        A mix of sarc and Reason. If not all cut at once it isn't worth doing.

    2. BYODB   2 months ago

      The fact he caved tells you how much he means what he says. They no doubt threw some pork his way and that got him to flip.

      That doesn't scream principled to me.

  28. Sun Wukong   2 months ago

    Sargon of Akkad making fun of reason darling Hassan Piker. It is a great watch.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ULyDcmk_uk&t=679s

    1. Randy Sax   2 months ago

      Everyone in that sphere shits on Hasan. Tim Pool, Ethan Klein, even Zack Hoyt (Asmon).

      1. Sun Wukong   2 months ago

        It is not like he Piker doesn't deserve it. Christ what an asshole.

    2. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

      Darling? They wrote one article about his boarder crossing kerfuffle and one titled "Against Champagne Socialists".

      1. Sun Wukong   2 months ago

        The article held him up as a hero, never mentioned his advocacy for terrorism and terrorists, and was a puff piece from start to finish. Yeah, he is a reason darling. Do you really think anyone on the Reason staff doesn't love the guy? Really?

  29. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan fiscal watchdog group, estimates that the House bill is shaping up to add roughly $3.3 trillion to the debt over the next decade." In other words: plenty of reason for spending hawks to be concerned.

    Spending goes down with this bill. But it doesn't increase taxes. This is the dishonesty of the narrative. Their estimates also use pretty low GDP and tax revenue growth as Bessent pointed out over the weekend. The same analysis was used in 2017 showing tax revenue decrease yet tax revenue went up after.

    Not sure why reason is so against consumption taxes but seems to be pining for an income tax increase. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    1. DesigNate   2 months ago

      That works out to roughly $300billion over budget per year.

      That’s a damn sight better than Pelosi’s and Johnson’s $1trillion+ deficits.

  30. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    They are, unfortunately, ignorant of the tradition of Le privilège du blanc.…

    Skynet would have known. The sooner it finishes taking over journalism, the better.

    1. BYODB   2 months ago

      Literally translated as 'white privilege' lol.

  31. Sarah Palin's Buttplug - Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)   2 months ago

    Biden's physician claimed he was a "healthy, active, robust 81-year-old male,

    And Fatass Donnie claims to be 6'3" and 225 lbs.

    1. Sun Wukong   2 months ago

      Tell us more how sharp Biden is you lying piece of shit.

    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

      And shrike claims the IT guy at reason hates him.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        Among many, many others. He is a slimy pile of shit.

    3. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

      Remember that time you managed to get your original account permanently banned here for posting hardcore dark web child porn links?

      Pepperidge Farm remembers.

    4. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      turd, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    5. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      "And Fatass Donnie claims to be 6'3" and 225 lbs."

      turd claims to be a sentient human being, but turd lies. It's what turd does.

    6. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

      "Fatass Donnie claims to be 6'3"

      How is Trump not 6'3"?
      He was listed that height for decades during his various TV careers too, and when you see him next to thousands of celebrities whose height we know, it checks out.

      You have the most retarded conspiracy theories, Buttplug.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

        Well, Pluggo is a retard.

  32. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Military officers refusing to follow the law and court orders! Insurrection! Oh, never mind, it's just gun-controllers...

    A group had sued the Fort for failure to comply with the law. They won. The Fort says still not going to comply with the law. Fort being sued again. Plaintiffs seeking US Marshal's to enforce the court's rulings.

    https://thegunwriter.substack.com/p/fort-devens-loses-in-court-but-still

    Fort Devens is a reserve military installation in Massachusetts. As it's federal property and a military base, it's supposed to have its range open to private entities like local gun clubs. They can charge for the use of the range, but federal law makes it clear that the fees need to be reasonable.

    The small but legally proficient gun club had won their lawsuit against the Fort. It had filed suit against officials for violating federal law granting them access to military rifle ranges at reasonable rates, as well as violating their members’ constitutional rights to due process and equal protection under the law.

    According to new legal documents not yet filed by the gun club, which may seek a contempt order from the judge, Fort Devens commander, Lt. Col. Carlos Poventud-Estrada, and civilian Department of Defense lawyer, John Hollis, are personally responsible for ruining their range day.

    The documents allege that the two officials, “intentionally and deliberately ignored, undermined, and disregarded this Court’s March 20, 2025 Judgment and Order and has interposed upon plaintiff and its members contrived and arbitrary new conditions and requirements in a concerted effort to keep plaintiff off defendant’s firing ranges, including the absolutely outrageous misconduct it perpetrated upon plaintiff and plaintiff’s members on May 13, 2025.”

    The gun club may also seek a court to order U.S. Marshals to enforce the judge’s order “at the disobedient party’s expense.”

    These are nearly the same allegations contained in the gun club’s original lawsuit, which accused the Army staff of violating 10 U.S.C § 7409 by attempting to charge unreasonable and exorbitant range fees; violating 36 U.S.C § 40727 by failing to provide logistical support to a certified affiliate of the Civilian Marksmanship Program; violating 5 U.S.C. § 552 by failing to provide documents sought in a FOIA request, as well as violating the plaintiffs’ constitutional rights of due process and equal protection and treatment under the law.

    1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      Babylon Bee: Liberal Goes Back In Time to Fix the 2nd Amendment

      https://youtu.be/ow-N0d1QTS8

    2. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

      Seems like a call from the Commander in Chief is in order.

  33. Sarah Palin's Buttplug - Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)   2 months ago

    CUT SPENDING!

    The Stark Math on the GOP Tax Plan: It Doesn’t Cut the Deficit
    ...
    House Republicans advance bill late Sunday, as budget analysts across the political spectrum warn that the proposal worsens the U.S. fiscal picture

    https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/tax-plan-budget-national-debt-analysis-e9822072

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

      Remember that time you managed to get your original account permanently banned here for posting hardcore dark web child porn links?

      Pepperidge Farm remembers.

    2. sarcasmic   2 months ago

      Math is leftist.

      1. Mother's Lament - (Sarc's a Nazi, not even joking)   2 months ago

        Big government funders, Sarc and Buttplug, oppose tax cuts.

        Because neither actually read Buttplug's link:

        The current proposal would increase projected budget deficits by nearly $3 trillion through 2034, locking in tax cuts"

        1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          The irony here is that both are against tariffs. Last month it was 16B. This analysis doesn't include that revenue. Despite it being half the estimated deficit from not extending tax cuts.

          And as said elsewhere the tax revenue growth used in the analysis is the same failed revenue projections used to try to stop the 2017 cuts.

          So shrike and sarc are demanding increased income taxes instead of consumption taxes.

      2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        And you claim you're not on the left as you use their same talking points lol.

        Irony that you and others here have been wrong in every fucking discussion, dismissing actual data.

        Just a few days ago you claimed you didn't want to raise taxes, yet here you are again. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      3. Eeyore   2 months ago

        Wait....I thought math was racist?

        1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

          Depends on who is doing the math.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

            So if you’re doing the math, does that mean math is alcoholic?

            1. Eeyore   2 months ago

              If it's the math behind quantum computing - it is 100% alcoholic.

    3. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

  34. Sun Wukong   2 months ago

    https://x.com/kylenabecker/status/1924284883729289299/photo/1

    Tax filings show the Biden's cancer research foundation spent every dime on salaries and nothing on research. Irony really is a bitch sometimes.

    1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

      Sorry, but that’s funny.

      1. Sun Wukong   2 months ago

        It would take a heart of stone not to laugh at that.

    2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      Qb will be here shortly to tell us why 100% overhead is justified.

      1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

        Why don't you first explain how "overhead" would even be applicable to a charity that funds nothing? You warped the point of the post for a cheap jab.

        The percentage you use for your slander keeps going up too.

        Why don't you also tell us how you're such an expert on government grants?

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

          Whine more, loser.

        2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

          Wow.

        3. BYODB   2 months ago

          For starters, how is it a 'charity' if it funds nothing? Lets start there.

          1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

            Right. "Alleged charity"

    3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      Snopes bends over backwards to "clarify" the "misleading" stories...basically admitting that the purpose of the "charity" was to employ people who did nothing to cure cancer except to professionally shmooze. In other words, to provide money to Democrat voting grifters.

      ---------

      These stories are misleading because they give the appearance of malfeasance by falsely framing certain facts, namely the organization's mission. The Biden Cancer Initiative wasn't a research grant-giving organization, which is why it didn't grant funds toward cancer research. This information is readily available on the charity's website.

      Under the "Frequently Asked Questions" section of the organizations website, you can find the query, "Is the Biden Cancer Initiative a grant-giving organization?"

      The answer?

      "No. The Biden Cancer Initiative will largely not be a grant-giving organization and will accomplish its mission through convening, connecting partners, catalyzing new actions, and providing venues to discuss progress and develop new actions and collaborations."

      "The Biden Cancer Initiative never intended to make research grants because we had a $2.5 million budget which was dedicated to creating collaborations among companies, universities, nonprofits, patient groups, researchers, and the government," said Greg Simon, former president of the charity.

      1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

        How in the fcvk is that a charity?

        1. BYODB   2 months ago

          It's not.

        2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

          FYTW

    4. Roberta   2 months ago

      Most of the expense of research is usually salaries. Is there more to this story that makes this odd?

  35. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

    Let’s check in with a real libertarian for a moment.

    https://x.com/trhlofficial/status/1924150197132689728?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA

    We are in uncharted waters constitutionally, and it comes down to a Congress who was derelict in their duty to 25A an incompetent President. Has the outlined time for a check and balance expired? Biden’s out, but the consequences of the autopen will last decades to come.

    “It’s almost like it’s intentionally coming out now so the journalists can save face.”

    Tim Pool questions the odd and delayed release of corporate media audio exposing Joe Biden’s mental decline that casts doubt on his presidential decisions on @JesseBWatters

    With video.

    1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

      The only logical thing to do is void anything signed by autopen.
      And by autopen I mean joe Biden.

  36. Minadin   2 months ago

    Friedberg said that if he were in charge, he would force spending to remain, at minimum, at pre-COVID levels, not post-, and that no new programs ought to be proposed.

    I'm sort-of on-board with this idea, especially the first part. But as to the second - no new programs - I think that has the potential to prevent any sort of innovation. What if, instead, we said: any new programs need to be offset with spending cuts to prior programs or other items?

    1. Longtobefree   2 months ago

      NO!

      Any new program has to be accompanied by elimination (not cutting) of three existing programs with equivalent budgets.

    2. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 months ago

      This time we get it right? No. No new programs. How about for every new program not created we cut three existing ones.

  37. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    "...David Axelrod, a Democratic operative, argued on CNN that conversations about Biden's mental acuity "should be more muted and set aside for now as he's struggling through this."..."

    Axelrod can stuff his misdirection up his ass. He and many others need to be brought to account for the scandal of hiding Biden's condition from the public.
    Further, you expect me to believe this hasn't been known for a while and you were promoting a candidate who stands a good chance of not living for the period of his proposed second term? What were you going to do, build a robot and wrap it in a Joe Biden skin?

    1. BYODB   2 months ago

      It's FDR all over again. Hide the decline and lie, lie, lie.

  38. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    "Why a contentious project to raise California’s Shasta Dam could move forward under Trump"
    [...]
    "“The winter run was the main sustenance source for the Winnemem Wintu throughout history,” said tribal member Gary Mulcahy. “We consider them the grandfather of all salmon.”
    For several years, Winnemem Wintu leaders have collaborated with state and federal officials to reintroduce the critically endangered fish to this wilderness waterway in a historic effort to revitalize the McCloud and reconnect with their past...."
    https://calmatters.org/environment/water/2025/05/shasta-dam-california-water-farmers-trump/

    1) We taxpayers pay for assholes like this to promote their religion, regardless of A-1
    2) That stopped being Winnemem Wintu land a long time ago.
    3) Trump, please make this happen. CA has doubled its population since 1975 and has added exactly zero water storage. We need that water.

    1. Eeyore   2 months ago

      They have removed dozens of dams with many more planned. In some cases they just don't want to pay for maintenance. Of course most of these dams are fairly small.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        Yes, but an obsolete culture is doing its best to block a very large one also:

        "...“Our governor has decided to sideline our most important public processes in order to build a 1.5 million-acre-foot reservoir on lands that are sacred to California Native American tribes,” said Regina Chichizola..."
        https://sacramento.newsreview.com/2024/12/17/sites-reservoir-in-the-sacramento-valley-remains-a-second-environmental-battlefront-between-newsom-and-california-tribes-and-conservation-groups/

        I.
        Don't.
        Care.
        About.
        Your.
        Religious.
        Beliefs.

        1. Eeyore   2 months ago

          I was not even aware of this project.

        2. BYODB   2 months ago

          Also it's unclear why the religious beliefs of an almost extinct culture takes precedence over the ability of millions of Californians to continue living.

          1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

            Why would you want Californians to keep living?

  39. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>No more criticizing, say Dems

    why, do they have cancer too?

  40. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>This already strained credulity for people who noticed his mental decline

    also strained credulity for everyone who knew he almost died in Las Vegas

  41. Randy Sax   2 months ago

    I wonder if the original plan was once biden was re-elected in 2024 he will die 2-3 years in and kamala will take over for him then run in 2028 as an incumbent.

    1. Dillinger   2 months ago

      weeks.

      1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

        IT WAS HER TURN!

      2. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

        Needs to be over the midpoint to not count as her first term. Not like he was in public at all so AI presidential appearances would have sufficed.

        1. Dillinger   2 months ago

          five seconds after midpoint, then.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      I always thought that was the plan in 2020. I had Sept. (~8 months after inauguration) in the local lunch-room betting...

  42. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>"They are single-mindedly focused on slashing deficits by restructuring the government to dramatically scale back social programs, whatever the political consequences."

    I can't fucking wait to see this.

  43. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>a Mexican Navy ship crashed into the Brooklyn Bridge

    stop messing with my switches yo!

  44. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>Related to House GOP infighting: "The US government lost its last triple-A credit score

    in the same way the STL Cardinals recent good fortune is related to my recent good pitching in my league, but okay

  45. Use the Schwartz   2 months ago

    Flesh is temporary but the autopen is forever.

  46. Longtobefree   2 months ago

    The only thing I need to know about Biden is:
    "Who was running the country while he was LARPing as president?"

    Sorry they finally released the diagnosis of a cancer he has had for years, but it is one more cover-up by 'the cabal' to distract from certain audio clips.

    There are one or more people who need to be on trial for illegal actions during the time Biden was NOT running the country.

    1. Eeyore   2 months ago

      Yes, whatever, and yes.

  47. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>Someone bombed a Palm Springs fertility clinic

    we believe in nothing, Lebowski, nothing!

    1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

      Nihilists! Fuck me. I mean, say what you want about the tenets of National Socialism, Dude, at least it's an ethos.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Sarcs Kampf mit der Realität)   2 months ago

        Well, they finally did it. They killed my fucking car.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          This will not stand, man.

          (I am getting to the point where I have to watch that movie every couple of months.)

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

        It's your brain on marxism--when you believe you were born into a world of oppressors that you never asked to join, who won't give you the life of hedonistic ease that you think is your birthright, as all marxists do, the logical conclusion is that no one should be born into it.

        1. Zeb   2 months ago

          Or is it the kind of mind that is attracted to marxism?

      3. BYODB   2 months ago

        May the bomber be chased by three men in black unitards with massive scissors for eternity.

  48. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>Fascinated by le privilège du blanc:

    wow total nontroversy though

    1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

      Privilege color is the most important thing.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      White supremacy.

    3. Eeyore   2 months ago

      I'm offended that I now know that someone cares about such things.

  49. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>We spoke about the Romanian elections—and whether the annulment is an assault on democracy

    did you ... speak about it in 48-point bold for an entire week of multi-author articles @Reason?

    1. Don't look at me! (I’ll post my list if you post yours)   2 months ago

      What about Joe biden’s annulment?

  50. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    "Biden White House ripped after Robert Hur audio revealed: "Scandal""
    [...]
    "In the Axios report, Biden can be heard taking elongated pauses, stumbling on key dates like the death of his son Beau Biden, and not finishing his train of thought.
    A clock can also be heard in the background, marking every second of elapsing time between thoughts.
    The interviews were held over a two-day period, with Axios reporting that the former president sounded "much more engaged and vigorous" on day two..."
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-white-house-ripped-after-robert-hur-audio-revealed-scandal/ar-AA1EW9TI?ocid=BingNewsVerp

    Too local? Robbie's covering it on Rising.

  51. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    SCOTUS says that President has the authority to rescind Biden's CHNV TPS program, effectively ending quasi-legal status for 500,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans who were flown into the US under the fraud-plagued program.

    I suppose more specifically that the district court's injunction preventing him from ending the protected status en mass was stayed, which effectively allows the announced termination date (April 24) to take effect.

    District court said each and every individual shall have a hearing. Trump just said "The program's over, your status is terminated, self-deport or face the consequences."

    https://x.com/AGHamilton29/status/1924508183483072512

    The Supreme Court has sided with the Trump administration (8-1 with Jackson dissenting) to stay an injunction from the lower court blocking the March cancellation of parole for migrants under the Biden administration's CHNV program.

    1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      "The matter is still being litigated in court, but the administration can proceed with revoking the legal status of those who entered the US under the CHNV program."

      1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

        I'm going to miss the BBQ Goose.

    2. BYODB   2 months ago

      District court said each and every individual shall have a hearing.

      Yeah fucking right.

    3. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      each and every individual shall have a hearing.

      Here's how the hearing should go: "Are you a US citizen?" "Yes." "Show us your Real ID, your passport or your naturalization papers." "I don't have them on me." "You have 24 hours to have them brought to us. In the meantime, you're detained."

      Or: "Are you a US citizen?" "No." "Shut up and get back in line."

      1. Incunabulum   2 months ago

        Uh, Americans are not legally required to have ID. And I do not want a country where that is required.

        And you all can shove 'Real ID' up your keisters.

        1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

          Americans are not legally required to have ID

          No, but it's retarded not to, so virtually everyone does.

  52. Public Entelectual   2 months ago

    Some insight into how much trouble the New York Pilot in charge of the Mexican tall ship may be in can be gained from one of the pre-Rawlsian foundations of libertarian legal theory.

    Britain's 14th century Black Book of Admiralty dictates that if a pilot takes a fee for safe guidance, but instead puts a ship in harms way with loss of life, the crew can take him forward of the mast and strike off his head on the Samson post.

    1. Incunabulum   2 months ago

      The pilot didn't do that though.

      The ship lost propulsion and drifted back in the current.

  53. Incunabulum   2 months ago

    I would like to clarify something - Romania is not a democracy. Not since the government stepped in to decide who could be voted for.

    The recent 'election' is a sham and Romanians should be ashamed for participating in their own enslavement. From now until they take back control they'll only be given a choice of which flavor of WEF they can vote for.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Portuguese Culture Makes It Easier To Parent

Liz Wolfe | From the August/September 2025 issue

How Trump's Travel Crackdown Is Hurting Americans at Home and Abroad

Matt Welch | From the August/September 2025 issue

Superman Is About the Anti-War Vibe Shift

Matthew Petti | 7.18.2025 5:23 PM

Why Are Students Using AI To Cheat? Maybe Because They Shouldn't Be In College At All

Emma Camp | 7.18.2025 4:00 PM

Although Meth Is Irresistible, The New York Times Says, Addicts Often Prefer Small Cash Rewards

Jacob Sullum | 7.18.2025 1:45 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!