Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Destroy Thousands of Acres of Tomato Crops in Florida
“Between the cost of labor and the inputs that goes in, it’s more cost-effective for farmers” to plow over ripe tomatoes, said one expert.

Thousands of unharvested tomatoes are being plowed over in South Florida in a sign of what is to come under President Donald Trump's tariffs—or tariff threats—and immigration policies. Reporting by Miami's local Fox affiliate, WVSN, revealed that farmers are cutting their losses and letting crops go to waste due to increased picking and packing costs.
"You can't even afford to pick them right now," Heather Moehling, president of Miami-Dade County Farm Bureau, told WVSN. "Between the cost of labor and the inputs that goes in, it's more cost-effective for farmers to just plow them right now." Tomatoes are currently selling between $3 and $5. Farmers need to sell them for closer to $11 to breakeven.
American farmers haven't been able to out-compete cheaper Mexican tomatoes currently flooding the market, according to Tony DiMare, president of DiMare Homestead, which owns over 4,000 acres of tomato farms in Florida and California.
Even though the tariffs on Mexican imports never took effect for goods compliant with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, including U.S. tomatoes, the threat of tariffs alone was enough to disrupt the U.S. market, Dimare told WVSN. "The Mexican industry exported, in some cases, double and triple the daily volumes to beat being subject to the 25 percent tariff in February and March and the 10 percent tariffs in April. That just devastated our markets in the U.S.," DiMare said.
To protect U.S. tomato farmers from the harm caused by tariff policies, Trump plans to impose an import duty of 20.91 percent on most tomato imports from Mexico starting in July. The action, which will end a 2019 trade agreement establishing a minimum price on Mexican imported tomatoes, is expected to drive up the cost of tomatoes for U.S. consumers, according to Michael Strain, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
Other South Florida crops are also being impacted by the Trump administration's trade war. Dimare told WVSN that some Florida watermelon farmers are seeing their Canadian clients source their watermelons from Mexico to avoid Canada's retaliatory 25 percent tariff on American melons.
Labor is another concern: Immigration changes have driven pickers away. One homestead farmer, who chose to stay anonymous for fear of deportation, told WVSN: "A lot of people are really afraid and sometimes they come, sometimes they don't come, and the harvest is lost because it cannot be harvested, so that's why so much produce is lost."
The Trump administration is aware of the strain fluctuating policies are having on the nation's farmers. In April, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said her agency is preparing a contingency bailout plan for farmers should the trade wars continue to escalate. "We are working on that. We are preparing for it. We don't believe it will be necessary," said Rollins. She also noted the federal government gave $28 billion to farmers during Trump's first trade war.
While Trump is touting his recent deals with the United Kingdom and China as examples of how his trade policies are working, the Florida tomato industry serves as a real-world reminder that unpredictable policies can have far-reaching and unintended consequences on Americans' livelihoods. On some level, Trump knows this and has admitted that Americans will have to make do with less, despite being voted in to bring down the cost of living. The president's attempts at centralized planning will continue to drive prices up, and Americans will be the ones paying the price.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Once again, the real problem is .... government.
Trump's policies may be the latest trigger, but Biden flooding in the cheap immigrants was the previous policy trigger, Obama using prosecutorial discretion to not deport illegal immigrants with young children was a previous trigger, courts OKing such prosecutorial discretion was a previous trigger. Let's not forget Congress passing the buck to the Presidency because they don't want the responsibility that goes with the perks of office.
It's government all the way down. Blaming politicians who take advantage of government is a simple excuse to hate on the politicians of choice. It does nothing to solve the problem.
Not much different than FDR ordering the destruction of crops and livestock to prop up prices and help farmers, with the result being starvation.
Tomatoes are currently selling between $3 and $5. Farmers need to sell them for closer to $11 to breakeven.
So even if the labor was paying for the privilege to pick, it’s still a loser.
Plant something else.
Plant something else? Like plant SHITLOADS of bribes... Ooops, I mean campaign cuntributions... Into the palms of Dear Orange Leader and Fellow Trumpanzees Gone Apeshit? And beg and plead and plead and BOW LOW AND KISS THE RING for "special exceptions for Special People and Their Businesses", exemptions from tariff-taxes?
Yeah, I bet that THAT might work!!!
Nothing you say would work.
Well yeah, I have too much dignity and self-respect to Kiss Donald's Orange Ass to get "special exceptions for Special People and Their Businesses", exemptions from tariff-taxes...
Now PervFected YOU, on the udder hand, I bet, could EASILY AND SLEAZILY pull that shit off!!!
How many tomatoes? Is this per pound? Per bushel? This whole article is retarded gibberish and should be an object of scorn and derision.
>>it’s more cost-effective for farmers” to plow over ripe tomatoes
provided he is in his own field any farmer plowing over ripe tomatoes is destroying his own crop ...
Wherein it's claimed that a total loss on a crop is 'more profitable' than selling fewer of them.
I'd be a little more sympathetic if I wasn't aware of the many subsidies farmers get, even to the point of being paid to not grow things.
And the subsidies are because Dear Orange Leader PROTECTS us all from the free market! With stupid trade wars! If only farmers and other stupid people would just STOP voting for Trumpanzees Gone Apeshit, the TRULY free market could work for us!
Autumn, did you fail basic math?
Your premise makes no sense se.
I have never seen tomato's sell for $11. Ever. And if they are selling for 3 to 5, then the tariffs would be 200% to compete at $11.
This entire premise makes no fucking sense at all.
Do you really think she’s saying per tomato?
Every time I think you can’t possibly say anything stupider than you have before, you rise to the challenge.
Fuck you're dumb Nelson. I used a plural retard.
Way to fail yet again. Common theme for you.
Wow your intellectual veneer disappears quickly when you're clearly busted being an idiot (the $11 number is what they would HAVE to sell at to break even - had you bothered to read the article that would have been obvious).
The premise makes no sense to you because you don't read and have no interest in learning anything that challenges your preconceived notions - namely that Trump is God and is omniscient and thou shall not ever be challenged.
Try reading the article. Then read it again. Pay special attention to the 4th paragraph. You got this.
Did you think you actually made an intellectual or logical point dumbass?
The prices listed don't matter if it's a bag or a bushels which you don't seem to give 2 fucks about in your blind acceptance of a narrative.
Show me with any quantity where 11 is a break even point. Not for lb (consumer) or bushels (store).
Talk about being a retarded fuck and not even thinking past your first impressions lol.
The 4th paragraph doesn't explain the pricing used by autumn or this farmer dumbfuck. You just blindly accept things don't you?
God damn you're as dumb as Nelson.
Here is another hint for you. Commodities go up and down all the time. With or without tariffs. But you're one of the retards who thinks everything is always static so you can push a retarded narrative.
“ Show me with any quantity where 11 is a break even point. Not for lb (consumer) or bushels (store).”
There’s a pretty funny book called “The $64 Tomato” that might help you understand what production costs are, Jesse.
The break-even point is the price where the cost of producing something matches the sale price. The whole point of the article was that it is too high for any farmer to be willing to pay the cost of harvesting. It isn’t worth spending more money to harvest a crop that you will sell at a loss. Especially at a large loss, in this case.
This is also the general point about tariffs that you are too intellectually challenged to understand. They drive up production costs, causing companies to either raise prices or choose not to produce goods (a smaller supply), which also raises prices.
No, no. YOU are the idiot.
“ Fuck you're dumb Nelson. I used a plural retard.”
No, you used the singular possessive.
But I’ll pretend you’re making a good-faith argument. What is the unit size of tomatoes that you are talking about? You apparently know what it is because you assure us that they’ve never reached that level.
“ I have never seen tomato's sell for $11. Ever.”
How many tomatoes are you referring to? What unit of measurement? Do you even know?
I'm guessing she means bushels? But then she says a 21% tariff on Mexico will raise costs on Americans. What happens to the tariff free tomatoes Florida farmers are plowing under? It doesn't sound like they can compete under any circumstances. A little editing would go along way here,
A little editing would go along way here,
I'm dubious Autumn works in Ag Economics and has her hand on the pulse of the tomato trade. It seems likely either DiMare has generated these figures themselves or they reported a longer, more nuanced conversation that got screened through the OrangeManBad filter.
Reason is basically Rolling Stone without the music coverage.
"A little editing would go along way here" should be the new Reason motto.
lol
How many "editors" are on staff here? Most of them are bigger idiots than Autumn
Quick look at bushel prices and don't see anything close to $11. Most are stating $20 range. More for organics and specialty.
I figured that would be crazy cheap but pounds don't work either. Honestly Reason should publish a correction. These numbers make no sense.
If Reason started publishing corrections of articles that don't make sense, half the content would be corrections.
Nelson seems to think he knows.
I have made no such claim. I pointed out Jesse doesn’t know what he’s talking about, but that’s because it’s a day ending in Y.
What amount of tomatoes needs to be $11?
I have no clue. But Jesse assured me that it was ridiculous, so I’m sure he can tell us. Because he would never say stupid and untrue things, according to him.
I can talk about international supply chain in mass market products because I worked in that arena. I have no clue about how farm pricing works or what units produce is sold in. All I know is the basic “production costs have to be lower than sale price”.
I can also extrapolate that, because there are two decision points weeks or months apart (whether or not to plant and then whether or not to harvest) that there is a point partway through the process where you can recalculate and decide whether or not to make the second investment. That isn’t the case in mass market products. You make the order and pay for it, then 3-4 months later you receive the products and deliver them.
It’s why the yes/no tariff actions are so disruptive for international supply chains. There’s no middle decision point where you can choose to cut bait, like they discuss in this article for farming.
So you don't know what the hell Autumn is talking about either.
“ What happens to the tariff free tomatoes Florida farmers are plowing under?”
The farmers have to decide right now if they want to invest in harvesting the tomatoes. That decision is based on what harvesting costs them now, factoring in what they think the market will look like when harvest comes (and the chaos makes that prediction problematic at best).
If the farmer doesn’t think the sale price will cover the added cost, they won’t harvest them.
Business decisions are made well ahead of the actual event, you know. The decisions businesses are making now about orders and purchasing and inventory are for deliveries that will arrive 3-4 months from now.
I thought cheap stuff and international trade was good? It almost seems like Reason doesn't actually have any stances at all except "Whatever Trump's stance is, except the opposite."
Just think, if we had repealed The Jones Act Mexican growers could ship them from Mexico cheaper than DiMare could ship them within the US!
The whole thing is very obviously built backwards from the 'tariffs bad' narrative.
This is like the story from Liz crying about the 250 dollar blouses the other day.
“ Just think, if we had repealed The Jones Act”
Now you’re just teasing free trade advocates like me. From your lips to God’s ears.
You’re not a’ free trade advocate’. GTFO.
Just think of how much cheeper things would be if we haven't banned domestic slavery.
[deleted]
She’s a clown. Nothing Reason publishes should be taken seriously anymore.
Hundreds of thousands of homeless and starving
peopleAmericans, including veterans, and we are destroying food not because it's bad ... but because it's unprofitable.Boo fucking Hoo.
Look at the lying leftist doing its imitation of a human being.
I give you a 2 out of 5.
Counter point:
If only those homeless, starving Americans could pick tomatoes.
I know when I'm hungry, I want a nice filling, calorie dense tomato. Alas. No more. We will starve just like the the poor Irish during the tomato famine.
I’m defo titled for getting rid of the democrat population.
Volunteers are everywhere. We are 75 million strong. We just need someone to cut the red tape & gives a damn enough.
https://nationalgleaningproject.org/gleaning-map/states/florida/?fwp_state=fl
“ Hundreds of thousands of homeless and starving people Americans, including veterans, and we are destroying food not because it's bad ... but because it's unprofitable.”
Yes, because that’s how farms are able to produce more food next year. They aren’t charities. They can’t pay for their operation with gratitude. If they are going to lose money, why should they go out of business faster by doubling down on their losses?
Tomatoes are currently selling between $3 and $5. Farmers need to sell them for closer to $11 to breakeven.
Huh. I wonder why anyone in a normal, straightforward economic situation would eat the loss on the whole $11 and plow it all under rather than take the profits even at $3-5.
It almost seems like this is a boutique farm, sorry, homestead that was already overpriced and non-competitive and wasn't the least bit risk tolerant if not just plain stupid and manipulative. It's not like they were commanding $16 previously, competing with Mexican tomatoes at $16 and, because of tariffs, The Mexicans just magically grew 3X as many tomatoes and pushed the price down.
This happens to other food too. The economics are simple: plowing them under is one pass with the tractor. Selling them requires a lot of labor to pick them, package them, and transport them, and the end result is selling them below that cost.
This is true. I'd presume the farmers are more aware of their costs than I am, but I'd have to guess that the loss they would incur from selling them is actually a bigger loss than they're going to take from simply plowing them over. A lesser loss is the sane choice.
This is probably doubly true since they likely get a payout from the government for a lost crop that defrays more of the loss than if they try to sell some part of the harvest. It's absurd, but that's what happens when you meddle in markets.
Yep, exactly. And all the Trumptards can say in response are things like "Boo fucking hoo..".
Trump truly does bring out the best in people.
Lol. Your comments just accept one quote from person for one year as indicative of the entire industry forever because you're a fucking moron.
Fucking hilarious.
Let me guess. You are still pro buggy whip and eager against cars don't you. Fucking moron.
Trump has fuck all to do with it, farmers have enjoyed extra special subsidy for far more years than you have IQ points and tariffs have nothing to do with this issue.
Farmers using illegal labor at below market rates and baking that into their future estimates was a critically stupid mistake and this is a direct consequence of that.
He’s certainly demonstrated what kind of filth you truly are. The next step is cleansing.
This is probably doubly true since they likely get a payout from the government for a lost crop that defrays more of the loss than if they try to sell some part of the harvest. It's absurd, but that's what happens when you meddle in markets.
As indicated below, I've plowed fields under unharvested. Most of the time, you have to plant in order to qualify for crop insurance and you wind up in this specific situation. Similar things happen with beef and chickens where it's easier to cull entire flocks 6 mos. early, let the price of eggs float, and reap the benefits once the next generation of birds are laying.
I don't know the ins and outs of this specific business either. I do know they claim to be vertically integrated and, somehow, are *also* getting beat on logistics and labor from outside the country well beyond anything the tariffs could've done with the 200% price differential; which almost makes it seem like a political ploy from the get go.
I should've used a /sarc tag. I've plowed under crops and played in unharvested fields left to pasture myself.
That's my/the point: the Mexicans didn't just produce twice as many tomatoes to flood the market before the tariffs hit. They aren't taking a hit on $3 tomatoes that used to sell for $11 or $16. Even if they did, labor and transportation costs are eating up almost half the price. Labor and transportation costs that are, somehow, less for Mexicans growers.
As I and others indicate above, the math doesn't add up. The story started with "tariffs bad" and worked backwards, cherry-picking which numbers and costs suited their numbers until they got to the bare minimum such that with anything less they wouldn't even be able to talk costs/economics.
Without the additional information this could be (intentionally) like trying to blame FDR for the dust bowl. And it certainly feels like "OMG! Have you seen the price of eggs? Tariffs!"
Edit: Matter of fact, it occurs to me that we were warned about the shortages and consequences of Trump's tariffs impending descent. Fist pointed out that we would certainly be notified if they were and I replied that his prediction might be too straightforward and we'd get some niche, vague, and contradictory trade/tariff reporting... and here we are.
It's like the climate change narrative where, if the temperature goes up, it's because of man-made global warming. If the temperature goes down, it's because of man-made global warming but with the collapse of the polar vortex and the thermohaline currents, the entire globe cooled. If it stays exactly the same it's just the mean between the two extremes of man-made global warming.
[deleted]
“ Huh. I wonder why anyone in a normal, straightforward economic situation would eat the loss on the whole $11 and plow it all under rather than take the profits even at $3-5.”
Because they haven’t spent $11 yet, they are deciding whether to do so or not. Harvest has associated costs, including labor, equipment, and transport charges. Spending more money to lose money is the best way to go out of business.
The folk wisdom says, “Don’t throw good money after bad”. In gambling it’s called “chasing your losses”. In business it’s called being stupid.
Raw tomatoes are disgusting anyway. Good riddance.
...farmers are cutting their losses and letting crops go to waste due to increased picking and packing costs.
"Between the cost of labor and the inputs that goes in, it's more cost-effective for farmers to just plow them right now."
So, American labor paid above board at the legal minimum is too expensive to make their operation profitable. That says a hell of a lot in one sentence.
Thanks for that price floor on labor, government.
Also, I think they just revealed that the labor they were using previously was, shall we say, not above board.
Also, I'll just go ahead and say it, this reads like a lament from the South after they lost the Civil War.
Oh no, labor is so expensive when we have to actually pay the assholes!
For all of Reason's 'defense' of the natural rights of illegal immigrants, it seems they give absolutely no fucks whatsoever about protectionist barriers that make this entire premise impossible.
If American labor is not competitive on the world stage, the only answer is deregulation here at home. More illegal immigrants working without labor protections or lawful right to be here in the first place is not a solution, it's living on the backs of a slave caste and calling it freedom.
And no, making them all 'citizens' or giving them a legal right to work in the U.S. isn't a solution either since that literally removes their only utility to the U.S. workforce as illustrated in this very article.
And no, making them all 'citizens' or giving them a legal right to work in the U.S. isn't a solution either since that literally removes their only utility to the U.S. workforce as illustrated in this very article.
It's also not good from a diversity, liberty, intellectual, and labor perspective. You drain brain and labor from other parts of the world and leave them with larger populations that serve no purpose other than slaves, there or here.
This is actually a substantive and nuanced post, so please take my response in the same spirit.
“ So, American labor paid above board at the legal minimum is too expensive to make their operation profitable.”
Yes, that’s the point. It’s true regardless of the industry. In 2010 the United Farm Workers had an event called “Take Our Jobs” (https://ufw.org/UFW-s-national-Take-Our-Jobs-campaign-invites-U-S-citizens-to-replace-immigrant-farm-workers/). Can you guess how many people took them up on it? And how many of those lasted?
The challenge is that food production is something that truly is a security issue. A country that can’t produce its own food is vulnerable. But the cost of harvesting is high. If we had ag workers at minimum wage, food costs would skyrocket.
Personally I think that there should be a massive guest worker program for harvest season. 30/60/90 day work visas (longer visas are earned by leaving at the end) with housing provided by the farm and minimum wage laws suspended for the workers. I don’t know if that would drive up the costs too much for farmers, but right now they are all illegal immigrants anyway. This way there would be more protections and they would be much easier to keep track of. They wouldn’t be “stealing” American jobs because Americans literally aren’t willing to do it at the price farmers can afford.
“ Also, I think they just revealed that the labor they were using previously was, shall we say, not above board.”
Anyone who lives near an agricultural area knows this is true. Why do you think the red states that voted for Trump were appalled when ICE started rounding up their workers? They didn’t think he meant *their* illegal immigrants. They thought it was a nod-nod-wink-wink thing. I don’t think anyone is surprised the farm workforce is largely illegals.
“ If American labor is not competitive on the world stage, the only answer is deregulation here at home”
Regulation isn’t the problem. We are a wealthy nation and the cost of living here makes the minimum labor cost too high for things like mass market manufacturing and agriculture. No amount of regulation reduction will make American labor cost-effective. The gap between what an American would work for and what the farmer can offer is too big.
For things like manufacturing, it isn’t dangerous for us to outsource to other countries. For our food supply, it’s a different story. So we have to find a way that we can lower production costs for farmers that makes it cost effective to grow here. I prefer a market-oriented approach, where a temporary/seasonal job is offered to someone who would voluntarily take it, which they could afford to do because they live somewhere with a much lower cost of living.
The other obvious option is subsidies, which I almost always oppose. They never work the way they claim, they are ripe for fraud and abuse, and they are less efficient than a voluntary agreement between employer and worker.
“ More illegal immigrants working without labor protections or lawful right to be here in the first place is not a solution”
Agreed. We need to figure out how to decrease illegal immigrants and work is a huge draw.
“ it's living on the backs of a slave caste and calling it freedom.”
Well said.
“ And no, making them all 'citizens' or giving them a legal right to work in the U.S. isn't a solution either”
Citizens? I would say no, but have a record of following the seasonal guest worker program count in their favor if they decide they want to naturalize. It would help identify the law-abiding, hard-working people who would make quality additions to our country.
Giving them the legal right to work here? I don’t see another way to get what we need (domestic food production) at the cost level that the country can afford. I think a guest worker program is better than outsourcing food production to other countries with cheap labor. And that doesn’t even account for the devastation that it would wreak in the farm belt and Plains states.
What would your solution be?
Sorry, but how have the tarrifs caused this? Are we saying Trump didn't do enough to make Mexican tomatoes expensive?
Trump is making American fruits and veggies too expensive to bother picking (by lazy and welfare-coddled Americans is out of the question), by demonizing the illegal sub-humans who would be happy to pick them for pay which is acceptable to them. Who wants to risk being sent to be tortured, without a trial, in El Salvador? Better to starve and let the fruits and veggies rot, than to risk being tortured in El Salvador!
Trump is making American fruits and veggies too expensive to bother picking
LOL
Also, READ the article for more reasons why Trump's unprovoked trade wars are SNOT helping!!!
Even though the tariffs on Mexican imports never took effect for goods compliant with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, including U.S. tomatoes, the threat of tariffs alone was enough to disrupt the U.S. market, Dimare told WVSN. "The Mexican industry exported, in some cases, double and triple the daily volumes to beat being subject to the 25 percent tariff in February and March and the 10 percent tariffs in April. That just devastated our markets in the U.S.," DiMare said.
Also...
Other South Florida crops are also being impacted by the Trump administration's trade war. Dimare told WVSN that some Florida watermelon farmers are seeing their Canadian clients source their watermelons from Mexico to avoid Canada's retaliatory 25 percent tariff on American melons.
Canadians are ALSO boycotting American shit 'cause they are justifiably pissed off at "our" (Trump's) betrayal of them! For ALL of these TRUMP-SHIT reasons, they can't make any profits off of their crops!
I understand Canadians boycotting the USA, because why support your future totalitarian overlords?
Maybe we did deport all of the tomato pickers, but that doesn't really explain tarrifs causing this.
"The Mexican industry exported, in some cases, double and triple the daily volumes to beat being subject to the 25 percent tariff in February and March and the 10 percent tariffs in April. That just devastated our markets in the U.S.," DiMare said.
FEAR of tariffs alone will do this! Trump's itchy, irrational, unpredictable tariff-trigger-happy whims will do this!!! I personally bought butt-loads of shit from Amazon fearing the oncoming tariff frenzy, and now I am taking a break! I bet MANY others did the same, and now the economy will at least partially collapse!
(Also, fuck the stock market! I am staying OUT until stocks actually reflect somewhat predictable economic factors, snot endlessly random, haphazard Trump political whims! I'm tired of randomly being yanked around on Trump's puppet-master strings!)
Tomatoes are currently selling between $3 and $5. Farmers need to sell them for closer to $11 to breakeven.
Let's talk about that.
Oh. Never mind. You didn't talk about that at all. You just blamed Trump.
Actually, screw that. Time to take you to task, girl.
Tomatoes are currently selling between $3 and $5. Farmers need to sell them for closer to $11 to breakeven.
You are smoking crack. You're either talking about highly coveted preciously cultivated heirloom tomatoes, small-scale farmers markets, or profit margins.
But if you're talking about the tomato that goes into my Heinz 57 or that I chop into my pico de gallo, then you are smoking literal crack if you think that $11 is break even.
Are you smoking literal crack? You're a jOuRnaLiSt, so I have to ask.
American farmers haven't been able to out-compete cheaper Mexican tomatoes currently flooding the market
Gee, why is that?
"The Mexican industry exported, in some cases, double and triple the daily volumes
Gee, why are they capable of doing that?
Labor is another concern: Immigration changes have driven pickers away. One homestead farmer, who chose to stay anonymous for fear of deportation
Meaning, a border jumping criminal who offers better than minimum wage laws (ie. getting paid anything as opposed to getting paid nothing).
"A lot of people are really afraid and sometimes they come, sometimes they don't come, and the harvest is lost because it cannot be harvested, so that's why so much produce is lost."
Hire Americans. Oh, right, why would they pick tomatoes when they can leech off welfare, disability, and other government dispensations.
Which I notice you're not arguing against.
the Florida tomato industry serves as a real-world reminder that unpredictable policies can have far-reaching and unintended consequences on Americans' livelihoods.
Sounds like they have more of an impact on the illegitimate livelihoods of border-jumping fruit-picking criminals and those who employ them. If I have to go without ketchup for awhile, so be it.
Round 'em up, ship 'em out - do it as fast as possible before the Courts can get their robes on.
Sounds good to me. Next, let’s do the same to the democrats.
Will Americans pick crops? Reason says “no”
‘Cause no one but a Mexican would stoop so low
After all, even Egypt the Pharaohs
Had to import
Hebrew braceros.
Tom Lehrer being all relevant again after sixty years.
This is the worst article I've seen on here in months.
thousands of acres make Autumn sad but
Biden's millions of acres you don't care about !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BLM proposes opening 31M acres of public land to solar development
The updated Western Solar Plan proposal expands potential development by 9 million acres beyond the agency’s original proposal Aug. 30, 2024
autumn, just disgraceful your partisanship