Georgia Man Who Spent 6 Weeks in Jail on a Kidnapping Charge Says He Was Helping a Falling Child
Mahendra Patel was charged with battery, assault, and attempted kidnapping. He was granted bond.

After spending 45 days in a Cobb County, Georgia, jail on a charge of attempted kidnapping, Mahendra Patel was released on Tuesday on a $10,000 bond after a judge determined he was not a threat to the community. Patel, 57, was arrested on March 18 and initially denied bail after a mother accused him of trying to kidnap her 2-year-old son in an Atlanta-area Walmart.
According to the police report, Patel approached 26-year-old Caroline Miller and her two young children in the Walmart to ask for help finding Tylenol. Miller was sitting on a motorized shopping cart provided for disabled customers (even though she is not disabled) and had her toddler son on her lap. Miller told WSB-TV Atlanta that Patel grabbed the toddler and started "tug of warring" with her before letting go. Miller later reported the incident to 911 operators. "I had to rip my baby out of some other man's hands because he was trying to snatch him," Miller told the operator. "It all happened so fast, and he was out of the store, and while I was talking to the manager, he left."
Patel was subsequently arrested and charged with assault, battery, and kidnapping, which was later amended to attempted kidnapping.
However, security footage shown during Patel's latest bail hearing has been used to question the mother's claims. Patel's attorney, Ashleigh Merchant, claimed that Patel believed Miller was disabled due to the motorized cart and was merely trying to help stabilize the toddler as the mother began standing up from the cart. Merchant argued that Patel had no intention of taking the boy. Witnesses also failed to corroborate Miller's story and did not recall seeing any kind of attempted kidnapping. "The video couldn't be clearer: Mr. Patel did not try to kidnap this child," said Merchant.
Prosecutor Jesse Evans, on the other hand, argued that the security footage does in fact back up the mother's story and shows Patel tugging on the 2-year-old boy's leg before returning her son to her lap. Evans also highlighted Patel's criminal history—a past low-level felony conviction and a pending DUI case—and evidence that Patel may have been intoxicated during the incident (a point refuted by the defense). Additionally, Evans argued that Patel's statements during an interview with police that he knew Miller thought he was taking her kid and wanted to apologize for what he had done were further proof that Patel is a danger to the community.
After hearing both arguments, the judge presiding over the bail hearing determined that Patel was "entitled to a bond" and "doesn't have any type of conviction that bothers me in terms of any type of violent behavior." Patel was granted a bond and released later the same day after spending over six weeks in custody. He still faces charges, including attempted kidnapping. An individual is considered guilty in the state of Georgia of attempted kidnapping if found to have attempted to "abduct or steal away another person without lawful authority or warrant and holds such a person against his or her will," and includes even "slight movement" of another person. If convicted, Patel faces between one and 30 years in prison.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Might be nice to see the security footage. I see lots of links to news reports, and maybe one or more show it, but I'm not so curious as to start checking them.
And Reason has a reputation for glossing over all the inculpating details while exaggerating the exculpating ones. So Ima gonna hold back my outrage over him, and just wonder why the hell it takes 45 days just to get to this stage? This is the kind of simple alleged crime which should have been resolved by now. The security footage should have been available within hours. Why not hold the trial the next day? Show the jury the security footage. Let them hear the mother and defendant and the other witnesses. What else needs investigation that isn't settled now, 45 days later, and needs who knows how much longer before it gets to trial? What precedents matter and need to be looked up in duty law libraries?
Justice delayed is justice denied.
I took the time to look for you, it starts around 42 minutes into the hearing livestream. There is only one view of the incident and the camera, Patel's back, and Miller are almost perfectly in line making it almost completely useless. The defense attorney puts a lot of emphasis on how afterwards Patel walked past and interacted with Miller 3 more times as evidence in his favor, but it appears to me that the repeated interactions are actually what convinced Miller that this was a serious issue rather than an awkward misunderstanding. Also there is one witness to the event, and he both didn't actually see it and doesn't speak English (He was around the corner in the next aisle.)
As to the 45 days; I popped back through a couple of the articles and this was not his first hearing. But Georgia doesn't do bail hearings for felony offenses at the first appearance.
Thanks. I am both surprised and not surprised; Reason seems to go out of their way to only stoke one side of the outrage.
She already made a false rape claim of a Lyft driver. She needs to be executed
It is not in societal interest to make potential Good Samaritans afraid.
I do not know what he did or intended to do. But the drag of cases like this makes me furious at those who want to clog the courts with millions of illegals whose fate when Biden was herding them in no one cared about.
Good thing for him that he's not illegal, or he'd have been deported to a torture prison without any due process.
Good thing for him he isnt a conservative in 2020 or he'd be given no bail and held in jail for up to a year on a false charge decided by the SCOTUS as misapplied.
The difference here is that expedited removal is actually the law retard.
No conservatives were arrested or held in '20. Knock it off with the fucking lies. And even expedited removal still requires due process that many were denied. Just how many times did your momma drop you on your head?
Is that the best your weak little mind can do, drag out the Jesse signal instead of actually addressing the article itself? If you actually had a libertarian mind, and actually wanted to snark about how puny a 45 day delay is, you could have compared it to j6 insurrectionists who spent years in jail awaiting trial and got no bond hearing at all.
You are pathetic. Your one track anti-Jesse mind is pathetic.
You're still trying to kiss Jesse's ass and you call me pathetic. Too funny.
By the way, anything I write is a Jesse signal. The poor, pathetic man is obsessed with me. And you so desperately want him to be your friend. What a joke you are.
And you have no libertarian content to your comments. Are you proud of that? Are you proud of admitting your only purpose here is to trigger Jesse?
Pathetic doesn't begin to describe it.
You are the hero and victim in your own retardation it appears lol.
The Jesse signal should be on 24/7, since he's an utterly fake libertarian. Every J6 rioter got a bond hearing. If they were denied, it was because they were quite reasonably deemed a flight risk and their own unapologetic statements suggested that they'd be eager to engage in new crimes. That, and they just loved to drag their heels and paint themselves as martyrs.
Why is that funny to you? Are you sick
I never said it was funny.
Good, because you never are.
Look at you Sarc, shilling for a human trafficker.
That Ashleigh Merchant? The one that took down big fat Fani? I have no idea why or if any of this happened or didn't or why I should care. Doubt I could afford Merchant but if this guy can, carry on.
Additionally, Evans argued that Patel's statements during an interview with police that he knew Miller thought he was taking her kid and wanted to apologize for what he had done were further proof that Patel is a danger to the community.
Cares for women and children, empathetic and understanding of other's intentions, even if he thinks they're misunderstood or misguided, *and* male?
He *is* threat to rascal-driving-Wal-Mart Karens and their legal support community.
Is it really being a karen? If a man approached my wife and kid and touched the kid multiple times, she'd probably be paranoid too. Hell i probably would.
If you're a stranger to the kid, ask first. It is the norm.
I know Biden normalized touching and sniffing kids, but it ain't normal.
Moving the child into a safer position as they're just about to fold is not "abduction".
Chidlren are far more likely to slip and fall than they are to be abducted by a stranger.
She’s a racist piece of shit who has already been caught lying about being raped
Is it really being a karen?
Yes. Definitively. The whole "MUH KIDZ WUZ BEEING ABDUKTED!", even finding vagrants and minorities to pin the false allegations on, was explicitly early mainstream Karen behavior.
He didn't just approach them and start touching the kid. It sounds like a run-of-the-mill "Let me get that for you."/"Oh, sorry." moment that happens hundreds of times every day without anybody's kids getting kidnapped or anyone getting arrested.
Per the norm, potential mea culpa: it could be the case that Patel's car was searched and the white van was found to be full of candy and chloroform and Patel was a suspect in 3 other "attempted kidnappings" that never led to an arrest and Reason('s source) is skipping over all of that. But, as presented, it should be a nothingburger that Miller needlessly escalated to an arrest and trial.
Did m.c just say something sensible? Fuck me blind, it's a miracle!
So in California they expect rampant redneck fossilism to generate Sharknados. In Geawgia folks expect wokies to cause Babynadoes. And these are the ones LeftandRightist monofilamenters consider sane and normal.
Ease up on the meth.
One time in a checkout queue, a child stood up in the baby-seat of the cart in front of me, and I saw a danger that she could get a foot tangled, lose balance and fall on her head; so I lifted her to the floor. I wonder now how I might be charged.
I think the key takeaway here is that motorized shopping carts shouldn't be a thing.
They make no sense in the first place. If you're genuinely handicapped, you're going to need assistance to reach top-shelf anyway. So, just get assistance the whole way through. If you're a fat lazy slob that's just going to stand up from the cart and reach the top shelf by yourself, then you don't need the cart in the first place.
Get rid of them. Their true purpose isn't for the handicapped. It's for the morbidly obese. And we need to stop pandering to those shamu gimps.
I appreciate your general intent, but I must inform you that your position is not accurate. Although I agree that many people abuse the provided motorized carts, perhaps even most, that is not the same as "all." Some people do actually need them, and some people that need them are actually... wait for it... not obese or lazy. My mother was hit head on by a drunk driver 30 years ago. The front of the car crumpled, forcing the dashboard panel into her knee, which then pressed straight back. Her femur was forced partially through her pelvis. As a result, her sciatic nerve was badly damaged, leaving her with a complete "drop leg." (meaning, she no longer felt any physical sensation in that leg, from hip to toe.) Could she walk? Yes, after a few years of physical therapy. Was it easy, safe, or quick? No, no, or no. Even with a cane, she moved at the speed of frozen molasses. She was 140 pounds, and those motorized carts turned 3-hour shopping trips into safe 30-minute shopping trips, and allowed her to keep her independence. She was the textbook reason of why disabled parking spaces and those carts exist. I would ask you to consider not painting with absolutist broad brushes in the future.
Oh don't even get me started with handicapped spaces. And "service" animals.
Look, I'm not trying to be a jerk to the genuine cases as you describe here. But the problem is that the sheer number of abusers ruin it for the genuinely needy. And while I sympathize with your mother's plight, the fact remains that - as you even acknowledge - the abuse is great. And that's a big problem in this country overall, and its incorrect notions of social equity/justice.
I'm sure you're familiar with the saying, "This is why we can't have nice things." Because we LITERALLY CAN'T. Not without the exploiters and abusers lining up to exploit and abuse it, and then defending doing so by trying to hate on anyone against them by equating it with being against folks like your mother.
It's a garbage game they play, and it's folks like your mom who ultimately suffer because of it. She can't have nice things - things that we do to accommodate and help her out of her genuine need and our genuine desire to help - because the dirtbags ruin it for everyone.
You give your mother my genuine apology, especially on Mother's Day - but I'm not pulling away from this position. You and she shouldn't be upset at me. You should be upset at all the cheats and liars and grifters who take advantage of our charity and compassion and willingness to accommodate.
Because they ruin it for everyone. They do it in every single version of this subject you can think of. Because NOBODY calls them out on their bad, exploitative behavior. And nobody holds them accountable for it.
That's what stocks and pillories were for, once upon a time. And frankly we need to bring them back. A public shaming and ridiculing of social dirtbags. A chance to throw rotten tomatoes at their face, because of how contemptuous they are and how contemptuous we find them.
Shame is a powerful weapon against indecency. It's why the left hates it so much.
Who is "we"?
Remember, supermarkets exist for the benefit of their shareholders first and their customers second, not some vague "Sense of fairness".
There is no need to discuss whether people "need" motorizing shopping carts or not. If some people find it convenient to use them, and it's profitable for the store to provide them, the store should be able to provide them. This is what free markets are all about.
You really missed the point in all that, I think.