The Microschool Revolution Is Just Getting Started
Microschools are giving educators the freedom to innovate. Regulators need to get out of the way.

Forget apples—this Teacher Appreciation Week, how about giving educators something they can actually use: freedom. Florida did this with a 2024 law that opened the door for educational innovation by easing zoning and land-use restrictions on microschools, making it easier for alternative learning models to flourish outside the traditional system.
Following the passage of House Bill 1285, veteran educator Alison Rini repurposed a vacant day care center in the middle of a government housing project in Sarasota, Florida, and opened a microschool. A microschool generally refers to elementary, middle, or high school programs that are tiny by design, averaging just 16 students each.
Parents at Rini's school previously sent their children on a seven-mile bus ride to the nearest public school. But now they can enroll their kindergartners in a neighborhood program just steps from home. Rini is still a teacher, but she is also her own boss.
And she is not alone. Rini's enterprise, Star Lab, is part of a national movement that took off during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some parents, frustrated by the quality of online instruction, formed informal homeschool co-ops and learning pods as alternatives. These groups rotate teaching duties among themselves or pool their resources and hire professional educators.
Parents usually take the lead, but teachers are also getting involved. Many educators have left the public school system and launched microschools in homes, churches, libraries, strip malls, converted office spaces, and even wilderness retreats.
Former public school teacher April Jackson opened PASS Pod, a microschool in Atlanta, to help children from her predominantly black community learn to read at grade level. Former public school teacher Shiren Rattigan founded Colossal Academy, a microschool in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, with classes three days a week on a farm.
States should embrace this can-do attitude that gives parents, students, and teachers more choices. But across most of the nation, policymakers and teachers unions see microschools as a threat. Education industry insiders have an $857 billion monopoly, and they do not want money leaking out—even through microcracks.
The most common regulatory weapon is to define microschools as private schools. This triggers a host of one-size-fits-all regulations designed for much larger campuses—the kinds with ball fields, gymnasiums, cafeterias, hallways, nursing offices, and multiple classrooms.
Instead of focusing on instruction, teachers who strike out on their own must navigate bureaucratic red tape, pass on-site inspections, and respond to demands for unnecessary building and fire safety upgrades. At some point, the regulatory burdens become unbearable, and teachers can find themselves trapped in the same system they previously escaped.
These code compliance rules kick in as soon as any K-12 enterprise grows beyond a certain point. The threshold in Wisconsin is any "instructional program provided to more than one family unit." The threshold in North Carolina is more than two families. Imagine needing lockdown drills and $97,000 fire sprinklers for groups this small.
Our organization, the Institute for Justice, saw this abuse firsthand when a fire marshal in Cobb County, Georgia, tried to shut down St. John the Baptist Hybrid School—a microschool offering supplemental instruction for homeschoolers—overlooking a 2021 state law that protected microschools from over-the-top code enforcement.
Once our firm reminded the county of this reality, officials backed down.
Besides Florida and Georgia, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia have taken steps in the right direction. Based on the current regulatory climate, any move toward more robust school choice is welcome. The market is ready for an overhaul.
"A school no longer means 800 kids in 60 classrooms on two floors," says Rini, who was motivated to take action in Florida after seeing the postpandemic learning loss.
At its core, education simply requires students and teachers. Parents can fill the educator role, if they prefer, or hire someone else. The Supreme Court recognizes their right to direct the upbringing and education of their children.
Teachers like Rini stand ready to help.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
A true libertarian article would say there should be no public schools at all. Poor people can suck it.
Or maybe the [WE] Identify-as 'poor' can LEARN that *EARNING* is a part of getting ... instead of compulsively resorting to pulling-out 'Guns' (Gov-Guns) against their neighbors for everything they want/need.
How-bout that. A learned lesson (very basic one) already happening before the program even gets started.
Poor people can ask millionaires like Bernie Sanders for money for their kids' education or billionaires like Soros.
I'm sure they will be more than happy to give their money to such a worthy cause as education.
That can't be... I'm told endlessly that learning just can't/won't ever happen unless [our] Gov-Gun-Gods steals and dictates. /s
School choice means diddly-squat when all children take the same tests. End the standardized testing monopoly in education, and pedagogical options will flourish.
Protectionist regulations and anti-choice bias long predate mandatory standardized testing.
I agree that the standardized tests experiment has failed and that they are doing more harm than good. I just don't think that ending them will automatically fix the rest of what's broken in our educational system.
Correct. Hiring those who have been LEARNT by the system is nothing more than kicking cans down the road. The competent (i.e. 'productive') sector need to be the teachers. Company-hiring certification courses and such should be the 'standard' setters as they are in the hiring screening.
It is baffling how stupid it was to disconnect learning from competency.
"I just don't think that ending them will automatically fix the rest of what's broken in our educational system."
That's a silly argument. "The system is broken. Removing what is broken won't fix it."
-- Thomas Sowell
What does it matter to anybody else if children are taught that the Earth is flat or 6000 years old? Unless they want to get a job as a cartographer or paleontologist, they hurt nobody. Contrast that with mandating woke racism in teachers.
Oh heavens-no. Competent people who understand how things work, how to create, how to fix and how to balance their budgets might start surpassing (on legitimate tests) the academics of political correctness.
Such silly talk could change our world as we know it! /s
The alternative to a microschool - that doesn't require code/zoning changes and isn't basically some real estate play - is called a 'classroom'.
Both still require some element of public approval for the diversion/use/oversight of public funds. The difference is that a classroom can be 'rented' for one hour from the public school and the cost of that can quite literally be nothing if the school (already paid for via taxes) has vacant space available. Regardless - eliminate the facility cost - and the cost of that
classroommicroschool might be low enough so the parent can pay for the choice of that micro education option. Even cheaper if the teacher is, during other hours, teaching in the regularschool option. Even cheaper if the school facility lease revenues are used to create an endowment for poorer kids/parents who can't afford the now dirt cheap option of an asset-light microschool - aka classroom.yes. more of this, until all public schools are gone
"Microschools are giving educators the freedom to innovate. Regulators need to get out of the way."
The teachers' unions in the US are one of the strongest lobbyists in our country, so you can forget about any changes in the way American kids are made illiterate.
The teachers' unions in the US are one of the strongest lobbyists in our country, so you can forget about any changes in the way American kids are made illiterate.
Administrators run the schools and administrators run the unions. Any option that could possibly decrease administrative cost is a non-stater.
Administrative cost is what has caused the cost of education to rampantly outpace inflation. Administration is the grift.