Trump Gets Bored With the War in Yemen
The pendulum within Trump’s Middle East policy has swung back toward deal making, for now.

The month was January 2025. The Houthis were not attacking American ships, and the U.S. was not bombing Yemen. The month is May 2025. The Houthis are not attacking American ships, and the U.S. is not bombing Yemen. In between, there was a whole lot of bombing.
President Donald Trump claimed victory over the Houthis on Tuesday afternoon, after several months of a U.S. air campaign against them. "They just don't want to fight, and we will honor that, and we will stop the bombings," he told reporters at the White House. Shortly after, the foreign ministry of Oman—the famously neutral sultanate bordering Yemen—announced that it had brokered a U.S.-Yemeni ceasefire deal "ensuring freedom of navigation and the smooth flow of international commercial shipping."
In fact, the Houthi movement, one of the two rival governments in Yemen, has not attacked commercial ships since the beginning of Trump's term, when Trump brokered a ceasefire in Gaza. (The Houthis had started the attacks in November 2023, demanding such a ceasefire.) Trump began an air campaign in Yemen three days before the Israeli-Palestinian ceasefire broke down. The new Yemeni ceasefire is simply a return to the status quo ante bellum, at least with regard to shipping.
Although no American troops have died during Trump's war in Yemen, the campaign has been incredibly costly for U.S. military preparedness. The military spent $1 billion in just the first three weeks, a U.S. official told CNN. Last week, the U.S. Navy accidentally dropped a $64 million fighter jet into the sea. It lost another one to a landing accident on Wednesday; the jet was returning to its carrier after the ceasefire was announced. And it's not just about the financial price tag. The Department of Defense warned Congress behind closed doors that it was "risking real operational problems" due to being stretched thin by the Middle Eastern war.
Significantly, Trump seems to be extracting the U.S. from Israel's war. Asked whether the deal included a Houthi-Israeli truce, State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce told reporters that "this is about the Red Sea, the attacking of ships." Israel was reportedly not even informed of the deal beforehand. After the deal was announced, Houthi leader Mahdi al-Mashat said that the attacks on Israel would continue and warned Israelis to "stay in your shelters." Trump told reporters at the White House that he "will discuss that if something happens with Israel and the Houthis."
Just three days ago, Houthi forces hit the international airport in Tel Aviv with a ballistic missile, wounding six people and shutting down all of Israel's international air traffic. American troops in Israel, armed with a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system, reportedly tried and failed to shoot down the missile. In response, Israeli planes bombed the airport in Sanaa and the port in Hodeida, killing seven people. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu promised to further retaliate against Iran, which arms the Houthis, "at a time and place of our choosing."
Along with stopping the Yemeni campaign, Trump hinted that there were more deals to be made. He promised to make "one of the most important announcements that have been made in many years about a certain subject," with "really, really positive" news, before leaving on a trip to the Middle East next week.
The U.S. and Iran have been negotiating for a deal to restrain the Iranian nuclear program, and the next round of talks is scheduled to take place in Oman over the weekend. U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff brokered the Yemeni deal expecting to build momentum with Iran, reports CNN.
Vice President J.D. Vance told an audience on Wednesday that negotiations were going well and that "there is a chance to reintegrate Iran into the global economy," although he said that the Trump administration would go to war before allowing Iran to build a nuclear weapon.
Egyptian sources also told The New Arab, a British newspaper, that Witkoff came to Egypt with a proposal to enforce a "long-term truce" in Gaza before Trump's visit to the region. Israel is mobilizing tens of thousands of troops for a new invasion of Gaza. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who oversees the administration of the Palestinian territories, told a conference that Gaza would be "totally destroyed" and the Palestinian population "concentrated" into a small area, after which they would "leave in great numbers" for other countries.
But Trump seems to be losing patience with the Middle East in general, and with Israeli demands in particular. The downfall of former National Security Adviser Mike Waltz symbolizes Trump's shifting attitude. Waltz was demoted after accidentally adding Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg, an inveterate war hawk and a personal enemy of Trump, to a group chat for discussing war plans in Yemen. But Waltz had already fallen out of grace—after Trump discovered that Waltz was talking to Netanyahu behind Trump's back about plans to attack Iran.
And the shift is not just a case of Trump's personal grudges. His base of support is increasingly fed up with Middle Eastern wars as well. "We've been told Iran is on the verge of having nuclear weapons at any moment for as long as I can remember," Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R–Ga.) wrote on X on Tuesday. "People just don't care anymore because none of these things actually affected our lives unless they were in the military and shipped over to these foreign countries and blown up."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Except that if the Houthis attack another ship, don't be surprised if Trump swiftly wipes them out (as he did with ISIS in his first term, and as Israel has done with Hezbollah and is now doing with Hamas), and allows Israel to take out Iran's nuclear weapon capabilities.
All money flushed down the toilet…wars are so stupid and a failure. Netanyahu’s weakness is why Israel was attacked on 10/7 because he was weak like Biden and Bush.
No faggot, the whole thing is Biden’s fault.
Israel was attacked…I read that Biden was the president of America?
The pendulum metaphor is my thing.
So the pendulum metaphor pendulum swings back to Fist of Etiquette.
Fist is the Alpha and Omega of the pendulum swing.
Throw Petti in the Pit. He'll never expect it, no one ever does.
Trump has to be a warmonger so the fact he isn't starting a war and making deals instead is that he's "just bored". /s
But make no mistake.. If Trump wasn't "just bored" he'd be starting a war! /s
Did I read that article correctly?
Nope.
Bored is just a projection by the writer.
When I see people making claims about how the president feels, I move on. It is not objective journalism unless the writer is reporting how Trump told him how he feels. It's not for the writer to assume.
No wonder citizen journalism is ruling the day.
Weakness is what starts wars—Netanyahu was weak like Biden.
I already straightened you out in this above, faggot. Time for you to GTFO.
I’m here to stay! I ruin every comment section I contribute to!!
This "pendulum" of which you speak is way too logical and predictable to be applied to any aspect of the Trump administration. The only conceptual pendulum that might be used to accurately, if not predictably, describe the "policies" of the Trump administration is this one: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=chaos+theory+pendulum+simulation#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:b3088cbb,vid:bXxCxhZCCUA,st:0
Funny how often Mathew comes out on the side of barbarous terrorists like all Leftists.
It is the Houthis free speech to fire missiles ar international shipping or something.
The insistance on scope creep, that the US interest in stopping the Houthis from threatening sea going trade shoukd also extend to stopping their attacks on Israel is just bizarre.
You can get them to stop by force or deal making. Does it matter when the goal is to get them to stop?
Pay no attention to the completely obliterated main/international airport that is a smoking ruin in Yemen. I'm sure that had nothing to do with the Yemini suddenly wanting to play nice.
"Trump Gets Bored With the War in Yemen
The pendulum within Trump’s Middle East policy has swung back toward deal making, for now.
The month was January 2025. The Houthis were not attacking American ships, and the U.S. was not bombing Yemen. The month is May 2025. The Houthis are not attacking American ships, and the U.S. is not bombing Yemen. In between, there was a whole lot of bombing."
Hahaha, this place, every day.
Here, let me help.
When then Houthis are not attacking Americans, America is not attacking the Houthis back.
Weird, huh?
Crazy!
We were attacked on 9/11 because Bush was weak.
Have you noticed no one responds to you anymore yet? It is because you are a complete weirdo with a creepy name and you make no sense, which is saying a lot on this site.
I’ve got a great name for the podcast with Pinker— Pinker and the Stinker!!!
Good call.
Are you a pinker man? Or a stinker man? You seem like a stinker man! 😉
I wonder if Reasonistas will EVER get bored with contorting every headline about Trump to be as irrelevant and degrading as humanly possible. Anyone with an ounce of discernment can see exactly what is going on and we are bored to death with the grade-school level psyop.
I guess I should stop calling them "Reasonistas." They probably think it's cool.
The U.S. and Iran have been negotiating for a deal to restrain the Iranian nuclear program,
Iran has not pursued a nuclear WEAPONS program since the Shah. They repudiated that via a fatwa in 2003. What they have never and will never give up is a nuclear ENERGY program. They have that right under the NPT - where the IAEA (not Israel - who is not even a party to the NPT) develops the 'safeguards' to distinguish the two.
As long as the US and Iran are able to interact directly, there is a reasonable possibility of a deal. Which will in fact look like Obama's deal but will be called Trump's deal.
If Israel succeeds in determining the adjective used, or manipulates the US media/voters into believing that the absence of an adjective = WEAPONS; then we will soon be dragged into war with Iran. Which has been Netanyahu's goal since at least 1996.
More "Dem Jooos be evil" nonsense? Really?
Thank you, Misek wannabe.
...how sad is it to be a friggin' WANNABE of Nazi Rob Misek?
What part of my comment do you not believe? That Netanyahu didn't make a speech to Congress in 1996 deliberately conflating nuclear weapons (re Iran) and nuclear energy (re Iran)>?
Ignore 99% of his speech - esp his crocodile tears about Rabin's assassination which he PERSONALLY provoked. He's a lying sack of shit and always has been. Unless it comes to his overt manipulation of American pols and media which he can do because he views them (and you) with utter contempt.
The most dangerous of these regimes is Iran, that has wed a cruel despotism to a fanatic militancy. If this regime, or its despotic neighbor Iraq, were to acquire nuclear weapons, this could presage catastrophic consequences, not only for my country, and not only for the Middle East, but for all mankind. I believe the international community must reinvigorate its efforts to isolate these regimes, and prevent them from acquiring atomic power.
You and your stupid racist alt right ilk always try to go Godwin by weaponizing anti-semitism when it comes to a lying fascist like Netanyahu who has ALWAYS been trying to drag the US into a regime change war with Iran.
Back on gray box
They have developed the capacity to build nuclear weapons you fucking retard. This was announced by Blinken last summer. And the current administration has verified this.
Your comment is a sad joke. Just like you.
Correct. This is a very important point that is lost on almost everyone.
Lol, many countries without a nuclear weapons program but with a nuclear energy program do not enrich uranium.
Canada builds the CANDU reactors for a global market and does not enrich uranium. Neither does the Netherlands, Brazil, Australia, or many others. It's unnecessary.
Iran is trying enrich uranium.
Saying that Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program is peak dishonesty.
Iran having an enrichment facility is not indicative of a weapons program. Other non-weapon states do enrichment. There is one major piece of evidence that leads one to believe that Iran is not developing a weapon, namely that they have not developed one yet. Iran could develop a weapon in no longer then two years, but they have not.
Nuclear weapons are not in Iran's best interests, and I think they know that.
Here you go Tony, you retarded fuck………..
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/19/world/video/antony-blinken-iran-nuclear-weapon-breakout-time-digvid
“US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said that Iran’s breakout time – the amount of time needed to produce enough weapons grade material for a nuclear weapon – “is now probably one or two weeks” as Tehran has continued to develop its nuclear program.”
You don’t reach that level of enrichment unless you’re planning on building weapons. And this is coming from your fellow travelers.
If the breakout time is on the order of weeks, why has Iran not broke out?
Also there are many valid reasons to enrich higher than 5%. Thorium breeders would work great with higher enriched uranium. Also they might be building a research reactor or a medical isotope production reactor.
Medical isotopes are required to 20%. Nuclear-powered submarines require 60% - so military but not weapons.
It's a shame we've gotten to the point where Iran thinks they might need nuclear-powered submarines - but given the decades of threats we and Israel have made to Iran - and the requirements to be silent/stealthy in both the Mediterranean and Diego Garcia rather than just the Persian Gulf - it's no surprise and is completely rational.
Israel has been fearmongering about breakout time for at least 30 years. It was roughly one year when the Shah was overthrown. At some point, Iran will make the decision to avoid the 'Libyan model' (where the target gives up a nuclear program in exchange for being sodomized to death).
I don't see Iran having the technical capability for a nuclear sub for a long time.
Iran signed the Additional Protocols of the Nonproliferation Treaty. I don't see them building a bomb under the nose of the IAEA. No country has built a bomb that was a signatory to the NPT. They all either never signed or pulled out of the treaty. As long as the Additional Protocols are in place I feel good about Iran.
Iran graduates more engineers per year than Germany or Japan. Has for decades. The country is under sanctions - so they are massively underemployed. Those sanctions are 100% created by the US/Israel who both regularly and credibly threaten Iran's existence. That produces, in all countries, a 'rally to the flag' response.
They have three Tareq-class deep water submarines whose obvious purpose is to target Diego Garcia if the US attacks Iran. The weakness, from Iran's perspective, is that those particular subs are diesel-electric. Iran can already fit AIP (unlike say India). Nuclear propulsion would allow them to stay submerged for a few months - and would also force the US Navy to station its most modern elements in the Indian Ocean rather than semi-obsolescent elements. Which would be of great interest to both Russia and China. So there are many roads to achieving nuclear propulsion subs for Iran.
Iran has no interest in nuclear weapons. And there's no strategic value to having them - except as deterrence. Israel's bs and hype and 'intelligence' about Iran has not one scintilla of truth to it and is tactically stupid. The US/Israel's existential threats to Iran are the ONLY reason Iran may hit the tipping point re nuclear weapons.
Israel is not an existential threat to any peaceful country. Iran brought the Israeli hostility upon themselves. They could build a sub but I don't see that as a "weapon".
The CIA and Mossad built Savak (the Shah's torture police) in 1957. Khameini himself was arrested by Savak a half dozen times as early as 1963.
There's a long history that never gets into Western media
You don't ignore fascist pirates that threaten our cargo ships. We have to wipe these guys out. What would stop them from targeting a cruise ship? These guys play for team racial Islam. These MFers killed like 160 people at a Russian concert hall. You need hearts of steel to pull that off in Russia.
Biden did nothing to stop them. Trump pounded them, so they're willing to talk. We dropped bombs on their rank waiting to receive instructions. They'll think twice about threatening us now. Trump will bomb them. The guy won't draw red lines and hem and haw. He'll bomb you, and troll your deaths on Truth Social.
Who cares if they didn't attack us for 4 months? What, we're supposed to ignore threats if they don't act first? 10/7 doesn't happen if Netanyahu heeded intelligence. You don't let these cretins threaten your people.
India doesn't bomb Pakistan even Biden was still president. Enough of the world is getting tired of tolerating Muslim atrocities on civilians. No "war" is necessary. If you kill dozens of tourists minding their own business, we get to bomb your infrastructure. The Muslims will wail about dead children and women. Hopefully one of them will realize who holds the key to their kids and women not being bombed.
Trump surrendered to the Houthis just like he surrendered to the Taliban. Trump is a big flappy pussy that apparently believes in strength through weakness! I bet Melania, the First Whore, has a flappy pussy from getting security guard dick.
Even though I'm skeptical of Trump, I firmly believe that Trump is much less of a warmongering president that we have had for several decades. This does not mean that Trump will resort to force from time to time. The reality is that there is a military industrial complex that spans both sides of the warmongering uni-party swamp.
Trump is hated by the warmongering uni-party swamp because he tends to lean towards negotiations and even diplomacy rather than undeclared wars that every other president during my lifetime has gotten us into.
When Trump does utilize military force it is fast, hard and limited. Then he steps back expecting to negotiate a deal or utilize diplomacy to get what he wants. It not that Trump isn't a bully because he clearly is a bully, but a bully that is much less apt to engage in force than our previous presidents have.
We have had passive aggressive presidents, verbally elegant presidents, who play nice in public, but behind their fake public personas are wanton warmongers who capitulate to the military industrial complex.
I prefer the loud-mouth over exaggerated Trump who is less inclined towards military force, over a more verbally restrained president who speaks softly while bludgeoning other countries with constant undeclared wars and a complete capitulation to the military industrial complex.