Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Media Criticism

Yes, the Media Covered for Biden

It wasn't just staffers and strategists.

Robby Soave | 5.1.2025 4:39 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Joe Biden walks hand-in-hand with Dr. Jill Biden at Pope Francis' funeral | Francesco Fotia/AGF/Universal Images Group/Newscom
Joe Biden (Francesco Fotia/AGF/Universal Images Group/Newscom)

The mainstream media's failure to swiftly cover former President Joe Biden's cognitive decline was again a topic of conversation this week, after Axios reporter Alex Thompson gently chided fellow journalists during his remarks at the White House Correspondents' Dinner.

You are reading Free Media from Robby Soave and Reason. Get more of Robby's on-the-media, disinformation, and free speech coverage.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The 2025 dinner, which I attended, was a muted affair when compared with previous years: The evening's preplanned entertainment, comedian Amber Ruffin, was canceled in advance, and President Donald Trump declined to participate. Thompson thus attracted most of the headlines; accepting an award for his own reporting, he conceded that the press corp was far too deferential to Biden's inner circle on the topic of the president's fitness for office.

"President Biden's decline and its cover-up by the people around him is a reminder that every White House, regardless of party, is capable of deception," said Thompson. "We, myself included, missed a lot of this story. And some people trust us less because of it."

"We bear some responsibility for faith in the media being at such lows. I say this because acknowledging errors builds trust, and being defensive about them further erodes it. We should have done better."
My thoughts at the WHCA dinner on covering Biden. pic.twitter.com/V16yQkPh5n

— Alex Thompson (@AlexThomp) April 27, 2025

Thompson's frankness garnered polite applause at the dinner. But not everyone has been so willing to admit error. Consider Chuck Todd, former host of NBC's Meet the Press program, who was unusually strident when tackling this subject on Chris Cillizza's podcast this week.

.@chucktodd went OFF on the "virtue signaling" of reporters who play into the Trump narrative of a cover-up of Biden's health by the media pic.twitter.com/VUCYsz4K1r

— Chris Cillizza (@ChrisCillizza) April 28, 2025

"I refuse to accept this stupid premise because it's a manufactured right-wing premise to stain the media….There are MSNBC and CNN pundits that absolutely carried water for Joe Biden, but they're not journalists, they're former strategists," said Todd. "This is an attempt by some to virtue signal, it's pitting different news organizations against each other."

Distinguishing mainstream media pundits from mainstream media journalists is not as easy as Todd suggests. Cable news is full of programs that mix news and opinion and feature perspectives that straddle this line. For instance, how should we classify MSNBC host Jen Psaki? Journalist? Pundit? Ex-Biden White House staffer? All three things?

But the fact of that matter is, no matter how you tally the score, mainstream personalities—journalists, commentators, etc.—either missed the story of Biden's cognitive decline or were hesitant to look into it too closely. And when anti-Biden commentators really started venting about how old and out of it the president appeared on camera, mainstream media didn't just ignore the story: They adopted the framing of Biden's defenders and pushed the idea that conservatives were making it all up.

Lyin' About Biden

In June 2024, when Biden's appearances at a slew of public events were raising questions, the media ran headline after headline berating Republicans for trying to make this a thing. The Washington Post repeatedly slammed "misleading videos" purporting to show Biden flailing. And The New York Times similarly chose the word "misleading" for its headlines on this subject. 

For what it's worth, a few weeks earlier, The New York Times had actually published an article with the following headline: "For Joe Biden, What Seems Like Age Might Instead Be Style." Perhaps the art critic of The New York Times is not, strictly speaking, a reporter—but he isn't an ex-Biden strategist, either.

NBC News, Todd's own former network, engaged in much the same defensive behavior. News reporters at many mainstream organizations largely handled the Biden age questions in a manner that accorded with how the White House wanted them handled.

Todd is not wrong that the American people should reserve a great deal of anger for the actual Biden staffers, strategists, and Democratic Party leaders who were clearly aware of Biden's cognitive decline and tried to cover it up. These folks have utterly discredited themselves. But it's fair to say that much of the media went along for the ride.

This Week on Free Media

I am joined by Amber Duke to discuss Biden's decline, Pete Buttigieg, deportations, 60 Minutes, and biased news coverage.

 

Worth Watching

Once more the Sith will rule the galaxy! Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith has returned to theaters for its 20th anniversary. This is the third film in the Star Wars prequel trilogy, and it has always been my favorite of all Star Wars films. Until recently, that would have been considered a hot take; the prequel movies, Revenge included, were frequently derided by critics who misliked some of the cheap-looking CGI and wooden dialogue. They aren't necessarily wrong about any of that, but who cares? For Star Wars fans of a certain age—by which I mean my age—the prequels were the Star Wars films we grew up with, and we love them.

Today, a quarter century after their initial release, the prequels are enjoying something of a critical reappraisal. For one thing, Disney so ruined Star Wars with its truly dreadful sequel trilogy that even prequel haters are looking back at George Lucas' creation with something approaching fondness. At least he tried to tell a compelling story—with, you know, a semi-original plot—which is more than can be said for J.J. Abrams.

Anyway, Revenge is so, so great. I could go on and on about why I love it, but the core reason: Emperor Palpatine, portrayed with Shakespearean brilliance by veteran stage actor Ian McDiarmid, who nimbly shifts from subtle, Iago-esque manipulations to all-out malevolence and insanity. Even Mr. Plinkett, who gave Revenge one of the most negative movie reviews of all time, nevertheless concedes that "the emperor is just so wonderful anyway it doesn't matter." I also must salute Hayden Christensen, who had a really, really difficult job: Lucas did not write Anakin Skywalker to be particularly likable, but Christensen managed to wring some real pathos out of the role.

One other note in its favor: In my experience, Revenge has become by far the most frequently quoted Star Wars film, spawning more great memes than I can keep track of.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Did Mike Waltz Just Go Down John Bolton’s Path?

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Media CriticismJoe BidenBiden AdministrationJournalismMedia
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (50)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Stuck in California   2 months ago

    "How do you do, fellow kids?"

    1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      It's safe for Reason to state the obvious now.

      1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

        Didn’t bother reading. Was there even the slightest mea culpa?

        1. VULGAR MADMAN   2 months ago

          Are you kidding? These creeps are morally bankrupt.

        2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          Didn't either. But given their history I'm confident in saying no.

      2. Stuck in California   2 months ago

        Is it? Because Suave is still pulling all his punches.

        One example:

        Thompson's frankness garnered polite applause at the dinner. But not everyone has been so willing to admit error.

        Thompson wasn't frank at all. He acted like the White House deceived them, and how horrible it was that even a Democrat wouldn't be 100% honest. All of which is bullshit, he wasn't deceived, he lied. They all lied. They were entirely complicit. This wasn't an error, it was naked partisan propaganda. The partisanship very nakedly displayed by his "regardless of party" comment, as though the press' preferred party is squeaky clean but the icky other party is always lying.

        Reason needs to move out of DC.

        1. r   2 months ago

          Another pulled punch: The media "either missed the story of Biden's cognitive decline or were hesitant to look into it too closely."

          Remember, this is the media that gave the White House their questions in advance. And when Joe Biden got caught reading from note cards not only telling him who to call on, but writing out the reporter's question in full and writing out his answer, they completely ignored it - because they were part of it, they had agreed to it to gain access - they were 100% complicit.

          Now this same media is complaining because Trump's WH gave standing room only access to alternative media and is letting them ask a handful of questions each briefing. The arrogance and lack of self-awareness is amazing. Makes Baghdad Bob sound reasonable and humble in comparison

  2. Eeyore   2 months ago

    Why do these people have jobs? Oh right, because they are intellectual whores.

    1. VULGAR MADMAN   2 months ago

      Are sure about the “intellectual” part?

      1. Eeyore   2 months ago

        They are selling what capacity they have. An ugly woman who is a sexual whore might not have much to sell, but sell it she does.

    2. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

      They were doing their job.

      1. VULGAR MADMAN   2 months ago

        Even journalists got the rope at Nuremberg.

        1. Eeyore   2 months ago

          I look forward to the first youtube era Nuremberg.

          Watching the podcasts covering who swung today will be well worth it.

      2. r   2 months ago

        Their job is to prop up a senile President to prevent voters from knowing the truth?

        Journalism must've been redefined at some point while I was looking the other way

        1. Eeyore   2 months ago

          Your job is what the people paying you to do the job say it is. Propagandist might be a better term for the job they are being payed to do.

        2. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

          Oh I think I see where the confusion is coming from. Their job is to pretend to be journalists while spreading the propaganda given to them by their masters.

  3. VULGAR MADMAN   2 months ago

    If Biden had won reelection, the media, including Reason, would still be covering for him.

    1. r   2 months ago

      No, if Biden had won, they would be pressuring him to step aside now so that Harris could be the first Black Woman President.

      1. Eeyore   2 months ago

        Also the first "Joker" as President.

      2. Minadin   2 months ago

        Yeah, but we were saying that in late 2020, that they would invoke the 25th and oust him early on in his term. They didn't even do that after the debate debacle.

  4. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

    Even Democrats knew he was a senile toothless old fraud in the run-up to the 2020 election.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wy0UHUaWNQY&ab_channel=TheMajorityReportw%2FSamSeder

    1. Truthfulness   2 months ago

      The reaction to the election from the same guy was glorious to see:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNQHsm75YaI

  5. Dillinger   2 months ago

    too much too little too late to ever try again.

  6. Speaking for normal people   2 months ago

    REASON did it too. There are things right now you are blaming Trump for that you gave full pass to Biden for.

    Remember all the Libertarian talk about freedom and these two
    https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/11/sam-brinton-005.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&w=768

  7. Uncle Jay   2 months ago

    Of course the notorious MSM covered up Biden's cognitive decline.
    It's what the propaganda wing of the democrat party does.

  8. sarcasmic   2 months ago

    This article doesn't exist. Move along. Don't look at the contradiction of the narrative. Ignore it. Look away. Go away.

    1. VULGAR MADMAN   2 months ago

      Drunk child abuser says what?

      1. Eeyore   2 months ago

        Any good cocktail recipes or is the alcoholism to the point where you don't even bother putting it in a glass? Because there are days where I'm tempted to skip the gym and drink the whiskey neat.

        1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          Drinks it by the plastic bottle.

          1. Sam Bankman-Fried   2 months ago

            Remember when you thought a president getting a BJ was an impeachable offense because he was Commander in Chief?? And now we have a SecDef rawdogging married women with their family down the hall!! Praise Jesus!!

            1. Sailor1989   2 months ago

              The BJ was during his elected office you disingenuous fuck

    2. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 months ago

      I don't think that you get that the narrative you are looking to protect is three years gone at this stage.

      Oh, and your diatribe is trite at best. sigh.

  9. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 months ago

    masks. They don't work also.

  10. Lester75   2 months ago

    Yes they covered for Biden. It was unforgiveable. The 'lamestream' media won't get a chance to cover for Trump because his dementia will become so obvious over the next few years that his staff will minimize press exposure even to Fox. No one will get a look at him except AmericaOne and other state mouthpieces who will edit out the worst.

    1. damikesc   2 months ago

      ...yet he routinely gives hours of Q & A sessions with the press with nothing given to him in advance.

      Tell me more, please.

      1. Sam Bankman-Fried   2 months ago

        Melania is now president…she’s the First Whore! I guess it’s better than Epstein becoming president in Trump’s first term when Trump could still get hard…Epstein was Trump’s First Wingman which was more important than First Whore.

        1. VULGAR MADMAN   2 months ago

          “Im going to repeat things Republicans said because I’m incapable of original thought”

          1. Truthfulness   2 months ago

            Democrats*

  11. Minadin   2 months ago

    This is the third film in the Star Wars prequel trilogy, and it has always been my favorite of all Star Wars films.
    . . .
    For Star Wars fans of a certain age—by which I mean my age—the prequels were the Star Wars films we grew up with, and we love them.

    Ok, Robby, I love Revenge of the Sith, too, I'm with you there. It might even be my favorite (previous favorite was Return of the Jedi, even though most fans say Empire Strikes Back). And it's almost indisputably, by far the best of the prequels, but the other two kinda suck still, even if they are a lot better than the post-quels.

    1. NealAppeal   2 months ago

      "Ani, you're breaking my heart." - Padme
      Probably the worst written, screenplayed, and acted dialog in all the Star Wars universe. At the theater back at the OG release the theater broke into laughter many times during the "dramatic" moments at the end of the film. Being memed isn't necessarily an endorsement of quality. Just admit it is childhood nostalgia. I rewatch some of my favorites and am honest enough to see how flawed they were.

  12. AT   2 months ago

    "President Biden's decline and its cover-up by the people around him is a reminder that every White House, regardless of party, is capable of deception," said Thompson. "We, myself included, missed a lot of this story.

    The JoUrNaLiStS were literally the only people "deceived."

    1. Wizzle Bizzle   2 months ago

      You used "literally" correctly. You must not be a Millennial.

  13. Wizzle Bizzle   2 months ago

    Robby, you might be the closest this rag gets to journalism. So what the fuck? Everyone knew Biden was dementia-bound in 2019, particularly in his own party. Which is why they OBVIOUSLY hid him in the basement during the campaign.

    By 2021, he was shitting his pants and falling off steps. Which is why they OBVIOUSLY escorted him around by the elbows on camera every time he emerged from his burrow.

    By 2024, he had fallen asleep during numerous international confabs, called out for dead people at live events, confused every living politician for a dead politician, shat his pants some more, and drooled onto his bib while staring into the abyss in the few instances he actually took a question. In other words, he was OBVIOUSLY in such an advanced stage of dementia that only a Democratic operative could ignore it.

    Which is really the point, Robby. Anyone who didn't call this out years ago isn't just not a journalist. They're guilty of treason. The alphabet networks need to lose their broadcast licenses. Every major newspaper not owned by the Murdoch group needs to be banned from all governmental events until they fire every soul they employed during the Biden era. And everyone who works for an ostensibly libertarian publication who didn't call this out fervently and repeatedly starting shortly after the walking cadaver took office needs to take a lesson from the feudal Japanese and jam a blade through their organs.

    1. AT   2 months ago

      And before anyone says "they're guilty of treason" is hyperbole - ask yourself why these same people NEVER - NOT EVEN ONCE - asked "who's actually running the Executive Branch right now?"

      Because to this day, we still don't know. And we probably never will.

      If that doesn't shame, scare, and draw into question everything you know about American Civics and Representative Democracy - then I, for one, have a real problem with such a person being in this country.

      I don't like throwing the word "treason" around. I don't actually agree that it fits here. That said, any person - especially any "journalist" who refused to ask that question and demand an answer?

      They have no business being "journalists." And if they won't jam that blade through their organs, ngl I'm kinda OK with someone else jamming it in their organs for them. As enemies of the People and their State.

      You don't hate journalists enough. You think you do, but you don't.

  14. Marshal   2 months ago

    Todd is not wrong that the American people should reserve a great deal of anger for the actual Biden staffers, strategists, and Democratic Party leaders who were clearly aware of Biden's cognitive decline and tried to cover it up. These folks have utterly discredited themselves. But it's fair to say that much of the media went along for the ride.

    These cogs over here aren't the same as those cogs over there. You should reserve your anger for those cogs.

  15. DRM   2 months ago

    Yeah, so . . .

    "but they're not journalists, they're former strategists," said Todd.

    Distinction without a difference, Mr. Todd. Two words -- "George Stephanopoulos."

    I note that back in 1988, the Media Research Center started tracking the journalist/political operative "revolving door", with a regular section highlighting the cross-hirings in their MediaWatch newsletters.

    You don't have to like L. Brent Bozell (the conservative activist who founded the MRC), or agree with the political right, to draw the implications from the observable fact that the MRC was able to do a routine item on the crossovers. If there had ever been a real, important distinction between journalists and political operatives, routine coverage of the swaps couldn't have been possible. The rare cases of the "revolving door" would have been treated as important and scandalous by the news media itself.

    It wasn't rare or scandalous, because the news media itself didn't believe (whatever its occasional pious public claims) there was enough difference between "objective journalism", and what a Democratic congressional campaign spokesman or political strategist was doing, such that there could or should be any barrier to people from routinely passing from jobs on one side to the other and back.

  16. tennvol   2 months ago

    Fast forward 15 years as Robby reads article by GenZ writer praising the sequel trilogies as the best of the lot...

    Having been 11 years old when Episode iV was released, I will go to my grave knowing it was the best of the bunch, and it has nothing to do with acting or writing.

  17. Max Rocketanski   2 months ago

    What was Reason's take on President Biden's mental fitness during the years 2020 - 2024?

    1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      It was basically, "But TRUMP is old, too!"

  18. TJJ2000   2 months ago

    Great Article +10000000000000.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Keeps Most of Joe Biden's Energy Subsidies

Jeff Luse | 7.2.2025 4:44 PM

Florida Plans To Deputize 9 National Guardsmen as Immigration Judges To Increase Deportations

Autumn Billings | 7.2.2025 4:08 PM

The Tax Bill Rewards States for Higher Rates of Food Stamp Fraud

Eric Boehm | 7.2.2025 3:25 PM

By Settling Trump's Laughable Lawsuit Against CBS, Paramount Strikes a Blow at Freedom of the Press

Jacob Sullum | 7.2.2025 3:05 PM

A Federal Inmate Had a Limb Partially Amputated After Being Kept in Restraints for Two Days

C.J. Ciaramella | 7.2.2025 2:12 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!