Court Frees Palestinian Student Arrested by ICE at His U.S. Citizenship Hearing
A U.S. district judge called Mohsen Mahdawi’s detention a “great harm to a person who has been charged with no crime.”

The arrest of Mohsen Mahdawi was a test of just how far President Donald Trump's power over immigrants could go. Mahdawi, a ten-year legal U.S. resident and a student at Columbia University, was at his interview to become a U.S. citizen earlier this month. But because he wasn't a citizen yet, the Trump administration argued that it could deport Mahdawi for his protest activity, and had Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents pick him up at the immigration center.
On Wednesday, however, a federal judge ordered ICE to free Mahdawi, who was born in a refugee camp in the Palestinian territories, while his case proceeded. "The two weeks of detention so far demonstrate great harm to a person who has been charged with no crime," U.S. District Judge Geoffrey Crawford said at the hearing, according to ABC News. "Mr. Mahdawi, I will order you released."
Although he didn't rule directly on Mahdawi's case, Crawford said that Mahdawi was likely to succeed on the merits, and that keeping him locked up would "likely have a chilling effect" on the First Amendment.
"The court also considers the extraordinary setting of this case and others like it. Legal residents—not charged with crimes or misconduct—are being arrested and threatened with deportation for stating their views on the political issues of the day," he wrote in his ruling.
In a speech outside the courthouse, Mahdawi struck a patriotic tone. "For anybody who is doubting justice, this is a light of hope and faith in the justice system in America," he said. "To President Trump and his cabinet: I am not afraid of you," he added. The court order doesn't stop the deportation, but allows Mahdawi to walk free while his case is ongoing, reports Politico.
"I have showed my will, my desire to become an American in a place that I call home in Vermont," Mahdawi had told NPR from his cell. "And the American government has denied me this opportunity by setting me up, actually deceiving me. So now it's up to the American people to decide what path they would want to take, whether to have the path where they welcome me as a citizen of this country or not."
The administration had argued in court that Mahdawi's very presence in America "would have serious adverse foreign policy consequences and would compromise a compelling U.S. foreign policy interest" because campus protests could "potentially undermine the peace process underway in the Middle East."
It was an ironic accusation to level against Mahdawi specifically. Although his family had a history of armed rebellion against Israel—and he himself had witnessed killings and was shot in the leg by an Israeli soldier at age 15—Mahdawi had gotten into Buddhism and dialogue with Israeli peace activists during his time in America. He called himself "pro-peace and antiwar" in his courthouse speech.
The Trump administration is still holding at least two other foreign students over pro-Palestinian campus activities. Mahmoud Khalil, the first student to be detained as part of this campaign, cofounded the Palestinian Student Union at Columbia with Mahdawi. He missed the birth of his American son last week. Rümeysa Öztürk, a Turkish doctoral student at Tufts University who simply wrote a school newspaper editorial calling to divest from Israeli companies, has a court hearing scheduled for May 6.
The administration is also trying to deport Badar Khan Suri, an Indian postdoctoral fellow at Georgetown University. The Department of Homeland Security alleged that he has "close connections" to Hamas because his wife is the daughter of a deputy cabinet official in the Hamas-run government of Gaza, and that he was "promoting antisemitism on social media."
Secretary of State Marco Rubio has argued that the administration doesn't have a high burden to prove its case. "No one has a right to a student visa. No one has a right to a green card, by the way. So when you apply for a student visa or any visa to enter the United States, we have a right to deny you for virtually any reason," he told journalists last month.
While he conceded that the government has very broad immigration powers, Crawford strongly disagreed that those powers were unlimited.
"Noncitizen residents like Mr. Mahdawi enjoy First Amendment rights in this country to the same extent as United States Citizens," he emphasized. "If the Government detained Mr. Mahdawi as punishment for his speech, that purpose is not legitimate, regardless of any alleged First Amendment violation. Immigration detention cannot be motivated by a punitive purpose. Nor can it be motivated by the desire to deter others from speaking."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The sweet misunderstood terrorist sympathizer is finally released.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1913184390877790477.html
If only congress would change visa and green card laws to disallowing the executive to remove people who have ties or support for terrorism. That's how this works, the executive has to ask congress or else due as current law asks?
I had a feeling Petti wasn't telling us the whole story. It's obvious that Reason has given up any pretense of credibility.
If only an Israeli decided to demonstrate FAFO...
If we don’t cleanse America of the democrat party, they will fill our country with this Islamist filth. Just like their European counterparts have done with Britain and the EU.
Democrats have no right to exist.
Rule 1: kill all marxists
Rule 2: kill all islamists
Immigration detention cannot be motivated by a punitive purpose. Nor can it be motivated by the desire to deter others from speaking.
What law says that? Or is that just an ass-pull?
As Jesse's link shows this isn't about an op ed he wrote for the school paper. He was actively involved with named terrorists. Why does Reason always pick the wrong heros?
Why does Reason always pick the wrong heros?
The good answer is that they're really stupid.
It's worse, they don't know what moral is
Because they have no legitimate heroes. This is the best they can come up with.
Reason pushes indefensible narratives based on lies and distortions.
Try Magna Carta for openers , and proceed directly to the Bill of Rights.
Then get your act together and defend and uphold both.
Which parts specifically? Because i can cite the regulations around immigration and visas.
"Which parts specifically?
In re Magna Carta, the common law doctrine of Habeas corpus, and as to the Bill of Rights , all those it innumerates.
In eliding or confusing regulation and law, are you speaking in your capacity as an ignoramus or simply as a hypocrite?
So you've got nothing and are ignorant to what the laws actually are.
Glad we could clear that up.
Don't you have a scam websight to go to?
That quote cannot be operative as it would mean every deportation after arrest would be non viable. I'm not surprised terrorist supporting judges go this way just saddened there are so many of them and not enough stout trees.
I missed the part in the 1st Amendment that says our government can't revoke citizenship for what an applicant stands for.
Again with the "filtering the border" = violation of speech/religion BS.
No. Immigration law =/= passing laws against speech/religion dipsh*t judges.
Immigration law is passing laws about who (selectively) is invited to be a US citizen. That selectivity =/= laws against speech/religion. Rubio says it spot-on. THERE IS NO RIGHTS here.
https://www.nytimes.com/1981/01/22/us/justices-revoke-us-citizenship-of-a-nazi-guard.html
They can revoked citizenship for lying on the green card application too.
Right... "The government is censoring my lies on my application for citizenship!!! 1st Amendment violation!!!"??? /s
Nazis wanted to kill Jews. That was bad. Hamas wants to kill Jews but that's kinda okay. Trying to keep up but it's getting hard to do.
He was forcibly preventing people from going to class. I agree he should not be deported, he should be killed
Immigration detention cannot be motivated by a punitive purpose. Nor can it be motivated by the desire to deter others from speaking.
So all the Russians we tossed out for interfering in elections with memes on Twitter are as free to stay and speak as Hunter Biden?
It's funny the way Reason and The Media continue on with this crap and then continue to question "Why don't people trust the media?" and "Why is free speech in decline?"
You motherfuckers. You are the reason free speech is in decline. If a well educated populace is a requisite to a functioning democracy you fuckups can't even educate yourselves out of a wet paper bag.
That is, of course, (D)ifferent.
If "Team Rethugglican" reveals shitself to be hateful, foam-at-the-mouth Tribalists... Blaming EVERYTHING (Including SHIT'S OWN EVILS) on the Demon-Craps... Then that is (R)epulsive and i(RR)esponsible!
Your "IF" doesn't hold any water.
Maybe "Team Rethugglican" doesn't hold any water... 'Cause they pissed shit ALL away sucking Orange Penis!!!
How's yer "tariffs = tax breaks" working for YE?!?!?
https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2025/are-tariffs-tax-cuts/
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt says tariffs are ‘a tax cut.’ Economists say they aren’t
"Oh look over there ... a unicorn!", SQRLSY changing the goal-post.
"The Tax-Cuts and Jobs Act didn't happen!", SQRLSY on "how to deny reality" class.
So then Ye PervFectly AGREE with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt when She (AND Queen Spermy Daniels) say that "tariffs are a tax cut"? How's Yer PervFected "Tax cut" working for YE?
Court Frees Palestinian Student Arrested by ICE at His U.S. Citizenship Hearing
ICE then says oh no you don't. Rearrests him. Puts him on a helicopter and drops him from 12,000 feet into the Mexican waters of the Gulf of America. Goes to court and tells the judge - We don't know where he is but we think he's in Mexico. Can you refile the paperwork?
Oopsie!
Fair enough. There's no reason to have kept this guy in custody. He's being deported because he's fomenting rebellion, not actually *committing* rebellion.
Another judge, making up new standards on the fly for immigrants.
Khalil, who was detained for pretty much the same reason, was ordered deported by the judge who initially halted his deportation and tasked the Trump admin to prove that he was hamas sympathizer. And they did, in spades. I'm sure the judge was itching at any chance to let him stay. But things like video evidence is hard to ignore. So MM will be likely gone too once his green card is revoked.
Again, if Madwhi spewed vitriol on any other race - Mexicans, blacks, Trans, gays, Asians - we're not having this conversation. There is no 1A guarantee of residency. Indeed like clockwork, the left wing is already wondering "how come we're not deporting white supremacists first". The notion that America willingly admitting people who hate a certain group of people and urge violence against its allies WON'T be a foreign policy disaster is absurd. You think our relationship with Mexico will not be strained if we gave people who beat up on Mexicans green cards?
Make an argument that we should give green cards to people who urge blacks to be lynched. Tell me that we should legalize Russians who support Putin and work to undermine the Ukrainian cause in our universities. Show me where the 1A forbids contracts based on speech.
Don't feed me this self serving "even the worst deserve due process". Yes they do. But if our government taking away assets of Russian oligarchs and guns via red flag laws without due process only gets mild concerns from the left/libertarians but doomsday bells ring over Trump deporting a human trafficker, I can't help but notice.
The Supreme Court recently cut off another path for judicial review of decisions by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) adjudicators. In Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, the Court held that a decision to revoke the prior approval of an immigrant visa petition filed by a U.S. citizen on behalf of her noncitizen spouse could not be reviewed because Congress intended the revocation decision to be completely within the agency’s discretion.
https://immigrationimpact.com/2025/01/10/supreme-court-cuts-judicial-review-uscis-decisions/
Interesting.
The on,y way to fix this is to cleanse the democrats and eliminate their party. They will never stop on their own and will, become more lawless and violent. Better to put an end to them now, before they can do more damage.
How can you legally and forcibly deport someone without detaining them? Just say "pretty please" and hope they'll make their own flight arrangements?
Just as you can't give them "notice" and expect them to show up for deportation.
That was Biden's whole border policy.
He prefers to fly them in anyways.
Grab them, take them straight to the airport, fly them out instantly.
I bet courts will not like it, but it assures they will not be "wrongfully imprisoned"
So arrest him again. Black bag him, deport him, and then smirk knowing there's not a damn thing anyone can do about it.
"Noncitizen residents like Mr. Mahdawi enjoy First Amendment rights in this country to the same extent as United States Citizens," he emphasized.
See, no they don't. They enjoy what we ALLOW them to enjoy at our own discretion and sufferance. Ghost him, revoke his status, and dump him somewhere other than America - and there won't be a single valid legal argument against it.
It's no different than being a guest in my house, and then deciding without my consent to have a drag show in my living room in front of my kids. No. I will throat-chop you right then and there, physically throw you out of my house, forbid you from coming back - and you should consider yourself lucky (not to mention grateful) that we didn't just flat out kill you.
Because honestly, that's where America's at with the illegals.
And what are you going to do, mewl about "free speech?" Yea, you don't have it. Not in my living room, and especially not while you're only there in the first place because I allowed you to be.
No different for this guy. Bag him, put him on a plane, and defy anyone to do anything but caterwaul about it.
The courts are a joke as long as we have democrat judges.
I disagree, but I take your point. When they're obviously coloring outside the lines, we need the States to challenge their position and demand their removal.
Problem is, it's mostly the federal judges that are causing the mayhem. And for that we need Congress. Who will do nothing.
Which is why my position is that the Trump Admin should just ignore the federal judiciary completely right now, because their orders are toothless. There's no consequence for ignoring them, and nothing the Courts can do about him ignoring them.
Can't say it's a position I would have seen myself taking 3, 5, 10, 20 years ago - but here we are. These clowns HAVE to know that they're ruling in favor of media narrative instead of legal enforceability. And if they're going to intentionally do that, then what else CAN one do but just ignore them knowing they have no teeth?
Remember when that idiot Roberts said there was no such thing as Republican or Democrat judges?
Good times.
USA will be conquered without any shots fired, and we will have welcomed the invaders with open arms.
It's already happened in Western Europe. We'll see if the Second Amendment makes any difference here. The surrender to COVID fascism by Americans makes me think it won't.
UK will be a failed state in 20 years. Hopefully USA can learn some lessons from UK and Germany. The French seem to be waking up somewhat.