Political Violence Surges as the Use of Force Becomes Mainstream
Americans, especially on the left, are growing tolerant of using force to achieve ideological goals.

The apparent attempted murder over the weekend of Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro with an arson attack is, unfortunately, only part of the wave of political violence sweeping over the country. Recent months have seen assassinations and attempted killings, attacks on political headquarters, arson against Tesla cars and dealers, and other acts that make it clear that some people have gone beyond hardened political hostilities to assaults on people and property. Worse, Americans—especially those on the political left—seem increasingly open to violence as a means of settling ideological disputes.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
Political Violence Is 'Becoming Far Too Common'
"Last night we experienced an attack not just on our family but on the entire Commonwealth of Pennsylvania here at the governor's residence," Governor Shapiro, a Democrat, said after the governor's mansion in Harrisburg was set ablaze with Molotov cocktails. "We don't know the person's specific motive yet, but we do know a few truths. First, this type of violence is not okay. This kind of violence is becoming far too common in our society, and I don't give a damn if it's coming from one particular side or the other, directed at one particular party or another, or one particular person or another."
We've since learned more about Cody Balmer, who has been charged with the attack. He hates Shapiro, and before the attack "appeared to share anti-capitalist and anarchist posts on his Facebook," according to the U.K.'s The Times. Those included "a picture of an embroidery hoop featuring a hand-stitched flaming Molotov cocktail and the words 'Be the light you want to see in the world.'" The attack occurred at the beginning of Passover and Shapiro is Jewish, though it's unknown if that played a role.
Balmer also appears to be mentally unwell. That's not uncommon for people who try to set the world to their vision of right by hurting or killing people who disagree with them.
From Torching Teslas to Swatting
The choice of incendiary devices for the attack is a trendy one at the moment. An Albuquerque man, Jamison Wagner, was arrested and charged this week in connection with attacks on the headquarters of the Republican Party of New Mexico and a Tesla dealership.
Tesla vehicles and properties have been popular targets since Tesla head Elon Musk helped establish the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to cut government size and expense. Tesla superchargers have been torched, dealerships shot up and set ablaze, vehicles vandalized, and drivers harassed. All this is in protest of efforts to shrink government.
In recent months we've also seen a less explicitly violent, but still potentially lethal, surge in swatting attacks—bogus crime reports meant to draw police response to a targeted person's home.
"I want to address the alarming rise in 'Swatting' incidents targeting media figures," FBI Director Kash Patel commented on March 14. "The FBI is aware of this dangerous trend, and my team and I are already taking action to investigate and hold those responsible accountable."
Swatting can be and has been lethal if police open fire on awakened and unsuspecting residents.
CNN reported that "almost all the influencers who have publicized their recent swattings are conservative supporters of President Donald Trump. Many have also interacted with top Trump adviser and donor Elon Musk on X over the years, with Musk either replying to them or reposting their X posts."
That's an incomplete list of incidents just since the beginning of this year. If we go back to last year, we have two assassination attempts against then-presidential candidate Donald Trump, the murder of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson by—allegedly—a man who has since become a cult figure, a Democratic campaign office shot up in Arizona, and plenty more. Suffice to say that political relations in this country have been nasty for a while and are getting worse.
Political scientists have argued for years that the right is more prone to violence than the left. That always seemed a dubious claim subject more to the period selected for examination than any inherent disposition. It certainly has not been true in the U.S. since Republicans won the 2024 elections.
A Growing 'Assassination Culture' on the Left
Writing for the Brookings Institution in January, senior fellow Dana R. Fisher reported that participants in the anti-Trump People's March were surprisingly open to violence to achieve their political goals.
"A third of participants at the People's March (33%) reported that they believed that 'because things have gotten so far off track, Americans may have to resort to violence in order to save our country," Fisher wrote. She noted that the numbers represented a shift over time toward acceptance of violence on the left to the point where it met and exceeded similar attitudes on the right.
In March, after similar (35 percent) support for violence at the Stand Up for Science Rally, Fisher commented that "left-leaning Americans participating in peaceful, legally permitted demonstrations are starting to believe that political violence will be necessary to save America."
Last week, a report from the Network Contagion Research Institute and the Rutgers University Social Perception Lab warned that "a broader 'assassination culture' appears to be emerging within segments of the U.S. public on the extreme left, with expanding targets now including figures such as Donald Trump and Elon Musk." According to survey results in the report, "over half of those who self-identified as left of center (55.2%) reported that if someone murdered Donald Trump, they would be at least somewhat justified…. Similar proportions supported murdering Musk and destroying Tesla dealerships."
An earlier report published in December 2024 had found that fans of Luigi Mangione, the alleged assassin of Brian Thompson, are cheering each other on through social media platforms and communications, "creating widespread cultural shifts that lower moral boundaries for targeted violence against political, social, or class enemies."
After years of growing tension in the United States and demonization by partisans of those who disagree with them, the use of violence to punish political enemies and as a tool for achieving ideological goals is becoming more mainstream. The people who embrace violence then reinforce similar attitudes in others who share their ideological beliefs, making acceptance of violence even more common.
Unsurprisingly, the market for insurance against political violence is surging along with the risk.
Josh Shapiro survived the attempt against his life. We'll see if the country will be equally lucky.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Worse, Americans—especially those on the political left—seem increasingly open to violence as a means of settling ideological disputes.
Wait until they discover how many guns their targets have.
The people who embrace violence then reinforce similar attitudes in others who share their ideological beliefs, making acceptance of violence even more common.
And yet, they never ask, "Are we the baddies?" (as they breathlessly declare anyone but themselves to be "nazis").
Rethugglicans did shit first and worst, so shit is OK if Demon-Craps do shit, too!!!
Don't forget "Hang Mike Pence" and "Execute General Milley" from DEAR ORANGE LEADER SHITSELF!!! Twat a LOVERLY Imperial Example to set for the peons to follow!
Words are not violence and neither of those things happened.
Your speech (or silence) is violence. Their violence is just harmless speech.
Speech is violence.
Silence is violence.
Violence is 'Mostly peaceful' (when done by the left).
And I bet that You PervFectly ALSO believe that Jan 06 Trumpanzees Gone Apeshit-Rioting NEVER conducted ANY violence, too, right?
READ the below and hang your tiny brainless, power-lusting shit-head in SHAME for always taking the side of Trumpanzees, power-luster-pig!
https://www.jpost.com/international/kill-him-with-his-own-gun-dc-cop-talks-about-the-riot-655709 also https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/04/28/michael-fanone-trump-gop-riots/ ‘Kill him with his own gun’ – DC cop talks about Capitol riot
DC Police officer Michael Fanone: I had a choice to make: Use deadly force, which would likely result with the mob ending his life, or trying something else.
“Pro-law-and-order” Trumpturds take the side of trumpanzees going apeshit, making cops beg for their lives! For trying to defend democracy against mobocracy! Can you slime-wads sink ANY lower?!?!
Deepstate assets in the crowd made the calls for violence. Too bad the cops weren't clued in on the plan.
So sorry that this is happening to you, Shillsy.
Police warrant says arsonist targeted Pa. Gov. Shapiro for “what he wants to do to Palestinian people”
Altruist Totalitarian comes masked in fakeness to lecture no-aggression libertarians on how Christian National Socialist aggression goood and less-Christian International socialist aggression baaad.
You’re so retarded.
It’s increasingly common, and has always been the case, that leftists are mentally unwell.
I'm sick and tired of politicians lecturing us about this shit, when they can SNOT be bothered to police their own!!!
Marjorie Taylor Greene started shit all!!!
Marjorie Taylor Greene says execute democrats
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/26/politics/marjorie-taylor-greene-democrats-violence/index.html
Marjorie Taylor Greene indicated support for executing prominent Democrats in 2018 and 2019 before running for Congress
From there…
In one post, from January 2019, Greene liked a comment that said "a bullet to the head would be quicker" to remove House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. In other posts, Greene liked comments about executing FBI agents who, in her eyes, were part of the "deep state" working against Trump.
Also "team R" offending politician-asshole here:
https://www.newsweek.com/pro-trump-congressional-candidate-says-audit-all-50-states-execute-all-involved-1632838
Pro-Trump Congressional Candidate Says 'Audit All 50 states' and 'Execute All Involved'
How 'criminal' do you plan to make words against [Na]tional So[zi]alist[s]?
What did Bernie say he was again?
What does Bernie do for a living?
Butt, whatabout that them thar whatabouts? Twatabout Hillary? Whatabout OJ Simpson?
How many brain cells does it take to run a socio-political simulation on the following:
Judge and Jury: “Murderer, we find you guilty of murder! 20 years in the hoosegow for YOU! Now OFF with ye!”
Murderer: “But OJ Simpson got off for murder, why not me? We’re all equal, and need to be treated likewise-equal!”
Judge and Jury: “Oh, yes, sure, we forgot about that! You’re free to go! Have a good life, and try not to murder too many MORE people, please! Goodbye!”
Now WHERE does this line of thinking and acting lead to? Think REALLY-REALLY HARD now, please! What ABOUT OJ Simpson, now? Can we make progress towards peace & justice in this fashion?
(Ass for me, I think we should have PUT THE SQUEEZE on OJ!)
fuck off and die, spastic asshole.
Show us how shit's done, be an example to us all, Sevo the Pedo, Hippo in a Speedo! Else Ye are a PervFected hypocrite!
The only people committing violence are those on the left.
ANTIFA, BLM, Trans groups, anyone dumb enough to get caught up in leftist ideology which ultimately teaches them that violence is the only route to change.
Soldiers and policemen and policewomen of the USA are committing violence... Are they then ALL left-tits?
So, among many other things, you also don't understand the difference between a violent action (a cop getting too aggressive, for example) and political violence (terrorism).
"The only people committing violence are those on the left.", JohnZ wrote... With NO mention of "political" violence. If war and law enforcement are SNOT "political" (look it up; having to do with POWER and WHO makes decisions), then twat IS "political" to YOUR PervFected mind?
Political = relating to the government or the public affairs of a country.... Says The Google!!!
Sow the wind ...
Here's a Hint................
The left literally lobbies for Gov-Gun 'armed-theft' for their [WE] Identify-as gangs and likes to call it 'equality'.
Seriously. What did you expect to come from the left.
They're not against 'Guns' at all. Gov-'Guns' are their favorite tool.
They're just against YOU having a 'Gun'.
Leftists are inherently violent. News at 11.
He tries downplaying that this is the real story. The only example cited that you'd guess was from the right had no motivation or even a suspect. It really just sounded like kids with a bb gun.
The left is aggressive and violent. Until Reason decides to address this blatant truth they can't be trusted and their "both-sidesing" is a defense of the left that attempts to remove responsibility from them.
Always blame the other guy! You can NEVER go wrong, THAT a-way!!!
(We are all PervFected now, ass long ass ye are on MY Team.)
Nobody’s surprised sqrlsy’s here running cover for violent leftists, are they?
And Your PervFected quote or cite is...???
(WHY are Your running cover for Satanic necrophiliacs, anyway?)
I'm not worried about it. I know who owns the guns, and I know who knows how to use them. I've been predicting this for several years now. People have said talk of civil war was ridiculous. I beg to differ. There won't be armies arrayed against each other in fields. There was be squads attacking public targets one by one. And once it starts, a lot of big talkers will suddenly go silent.
So why no link to equally literate blog?
You mean like this one Hank?
https://libertariantranslator.wordpress.com/who-is-hank-phillips/
Political Violence Surges as the Use of Force Becomes Mainstream
After "We'll report violence as down until the FBI revises the numbers up, then we just won't report on it." *after* "Mostly peaceful protest." I wish I could believe you. Could believe that you believe you've actually discovered something real and turned a corner. Instead, I have to surmise that it's more of a "They're right to protect the environment, castration of children, international globalist trade, and Palestine/Ukraine... just not with *this kind* of violence."
Instead, I have to look at the broken clock reading the right time and rely on my knowledge that it's not right, because it's broken.
I see you've been reading Sullum articles.
The problem with "we have the guns" is that it isn't as easy as most people think to kill someone, even if your life is in danger; it isn't always possible to successfully defend yourself if they attack you without warning, or from hiding, or if they torch your home while you are asleep; it isn't easy to successfully defend yourself if you are in your car and being attacked by a mob; and if you are, in any of these situations, successful, you are more and more likely to be tried in a court of law. You may win, but you will have spent much of your savings and retirement on the defense either way.
This is not a scenario where the left will don a uniform and declare war, at which point we with the guns will don our uniforms and march off to battle. This is a guerilla war by the left and they are prosecuting it as such. Look at Kyle Rittenhouse. Attacked by a mob, fired three shots and killed or disabled three attackers, indicating a serious regard for human life. He was dragged through the court system and is still considered a murderer by most people sympathetic to what the left is doing to this country.
A carefully laid ambush lays waste to preparation unfortunately.
“disabled three attackers”
What other group of people could you shoot three of them and have them all be pedophiles?
Re: Rittenhouse
Kyle had serious regard for human life: His own. That kid did not shoot willy-nilly into a crowd, even though most in the crowd deserved it.
When the leftist mobs decide to start guerilla warfare, we don't wait to be burned out or killed in our sleep. The time for passivism will be over. Preemptive strikes will be required. They'll be easy to locate; they scream their positions on social media.
*We've since learned more about Cody Balmer, who has been charged with the attack. He hates Shapiro, and before the attack "appeared to share anti-capitalist and anarchist posts on his Facebook"*
Since when did Nick Gillespie start going by "Cody Balmer"? Between the leather jacket and the psychedelics, I feel like we all should have seen this coming.
Balmer was diagnosed as a Bi-polar schizophrenic. He had not been taking his prescribed medication either.
His mother called several law enforcement agencies to check on him and she was dismissed.
This, does not, however, excuse his actions.
Moron
January 6th
'the left' is not the violence problem
Vermin
Your side bombed the same building twice and the bombers were pardoned by Democrats.
The left is all about violence until the right gives them a taste of their own "liberating tolerance."
Indeed and that may happen sooner than later if the violence continues.
Shouldn't at least one person have died on January 6 for it to be violent?
Ashli Babbit....say her name.
She was shot by a cop, not harmed by the "rioters". That means the response to the incident was violent, not the incident itself. You're not really contradicting Rick's point yet.
Translation: when a cop does it it's not really killing. That's an "offissa-involved shooting" totally unrelated to the reprisal stalking and shooting of offissas. Meanwhile, in a totally distinct, separate and unrelated probability space, looter politicians twist their hankies in angst and order more goons out to initiate force against "other" looters straying from Jesus' path of gin, cigarettes, taxation and sacrifice.
That’s an awful translation. Did you actually read what he said Hank?
Don’t fear the revolt!
(insurrection)!
All our times have come
Here, but now they’re gone
Seasons don’t fear the revolt
Nor do the wind, the sun, or the rain
(We can be like they are)
Come on, baby
(Don’t fear the revolt)
Baby, take my hand
(Don’t fear the revolt)
We’ll be able to fly
Baby, I’m your man
La, la la, la la
La, la la, la la
Valentine is done
Here but now they’re gone
Horst Wessel and Ashli Babbs
Are together in eternity
(Horst Wessel and Ashli Babbitt)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horst_Wessel
Horst and Babbs both wanted to grab political power through violence, and got back, what they were dishing out. Karma is a bitch! Live by the sword, die by the sword!
Refute it, bitch!
All of the political violence is on the Left. It's not even 'especially' or 'predominantly'. It's ALL.
Indeed. Funded by far left groups. Some of them jews.
Go hang out with Misek, Nazi scum.
Two people involved in funding leftist violence are jews.
Seig Heil!
Also funded by us, thanks to USAID.
Idiot.
Jan 6 was a protest and steaming piles of lefty shit like you claim otherwise.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
Jan 6 may have been the least violent "riot" in history. You're going to have to do better than that to make your point.
Certainly the least violent "insurrection" ever. They failed to bag even one politician.
Hell, they didn't even bring their own weapons to the "insurrection. Just anti-American Lefties like TooSilly claim it was anything close to a horrible event.
Translation: my altruist gang is rubber, your altruist gang is glue...
First, this type of violence is not okay. This kind of violence is becoming far too common in our society, and I don't give a damn if it's coming from one particular side or the other, directed at one particular party or another, or one particular person or another."
One of the common tactics on the left is to characterize leftist sins as American sins, while conservative sins remain conservative. So this is an admission the arsonist was a left winger.
Note the difference when Gabby Giffords was shot and they believed because of the victim the shooter must be on the right. They cared greatly what the motive was then. Left wingers could stop the violence if they wanted to, Occam's Razor suggests the reason they don't is that they choose not to.
Why would they stop their own footsoldiers?
I don't think the original plan was violence. Insisting your enemies are Hitler and spurring them to action claiming lives are at stake was originally designed to create reliable Dem voters regardless of the circumstances, which it does. It also has a side effect of making violence seem a reasonable response.
I suspect many people would prefer this side effect could be eliminated if it could be done without risking the votes the process generates. But it's 100% clear no one on the left is willing to risk losing those committed voters just to end the violence. To them it's a side effect that can be managed politically by media refusing to cover it and blaming the victims when it comes up.
Yes, and arsonists just like looking at the pretty flame, what's your point. Both intentionally unleashed destructive forces they cannot control so I don't care about the fantasy they concocted to justify their actions.
Reason: Slouching towards noticing something.
Violence on the right...Hmmmmm. For two years ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter rioted in every major city, causing $2 billion in losses due to looting, arson and outright destruction. Many people were assaulted and injured, some murdered. Cops were assaulted, cars set afire, all over the death of a career criminal and drug addict.
Now we witness the use of violence by the leftists as well as the continued existence of ANTIFA who should be treated no less than a terrorist organization.
The political violence from the left is being supported by shadow groups including Georgy Schwartz. These individuals need to be hunted down , arrested and charged accordingly.
IF leftist violence continues, it will worsen until the rest of us have had enough and bring about our own response. It is fast approaching that point.
The leftists are just bringing the way they conduct their personal lives onto the political stage with them.
Even Tuccille lazily resorts to the monotofilament line running from Stalin and Mao International Socialism through Zero Values at the center to Hitler and Nixon Christian National Socialism at "the other end." No surprise we are witnessing an infiltration-driven push away from the 1972 LP rejection of altruism and initiation of force. Looters of the materialist indoctrination sacrifice for rationing while religious racial collectivists sacrifice you to see who can excel at the initiation of deadly force for Jesus. The 2D quadrant in the plane valuing individual rights AND economic freedom from coercion is drained to enlarge the totalitarian quadrant crushing both and crowding out Reason.
Wow, what? I just want to know how Comstock fits in here?
Was is the left who was blasting people with firehoses and turning police dogs on peaceful protesters in the 60s ? Was it the left in sheets burning crosses on the front lawn ? Was it the left pointing the gov-guns at hippies ? Was it the left pepper-spraying sit-ins on college campuses ? Was it the left that passed a law to absolve motorist from striking protesters with a car in Iowa & Oklahoma ?
There is enough crazy to go around that nobody gets to stand on a soapbox.
Actually the KKK and Jim Crow laws were created by Democrats.
LBJ and his "Great Society" led to the destruction of black families. Now more than 75% of black children grow up in fatherless households.
"Was is the left who was blasting people with firehoses and turning police dogs on peaceful protesters in the 60s ?"
It was Democrats, yes.
"Was it the left in sheets burning crosses on the front lawn ?"
Also Democrats, yes.
"Was it the left pepper-spraying sit-ins on college campuses ?"
Feel free to list the campuses. For sit-ins --- pretty much almost guaranteed to be Democrats.
"Was it the left that passed a law to absolve motorist from striking protesters with a car in Iowa & Oklahoma ?"
The Left allowed them to cause people to die due to blocking medical care.
Do you want to go over the polling on the issue?
re: the Iowa law, you're talking about SF 342, correct?
If so, that law provides limited immunity to drivers exercising “due care” who nevertheless strike and injure someone who is participating in a “protest, demonstration, riot or unlawful assembly or who is engaging in disorderly conduct and is blocking traffic in a public street or highway.” The law does not apply if the injured person was participating in a permitted protest or if the driver was acting with “reckless or willful misconduct."
In other words, the law protects drivers who are trying to carefully maneuver out of an unlawful protest in which they have become trapped. Regardless of who passed it, I'm not seeing a problem with that law. If I've got my kids in the back seat and your rioting mob surrounds my car and threatens my ability to get them home safely, that's on you, not me.
"Was is the left who was blasting people with firehoses and turning police dogs on peaceful protesters in the 60s ? Was it the left in sheets burning crosses on the front lawn ? Was it the left pointing the gov-guns at hippies ? Was it the left pepper-spraying sit-ins on college campuses ? Was it the left that passed a law to absolve motorist from striking protesters with a car in Iowa & Oklahoma ?"
It was today's left, yes.
The liberalism of the sixties is embodied by MAGA today.
Get the fuck out of the road asshole.
All your other examples are Democrats.
Yes. It was. Literally. Democrats babe, Democrats have never changed.
Yes, the sheet wearers and cross burners were Democrats.
Yes, the cop pepper spraying was spraying at the order of Democrats.
No, it was conservatives that passed the common sense idea that if you are surrounded by people threatening your life you don't have to sit there and hope they're not actually violent.
Your side spent the entirety of 1968-1983 causing political violence, including murders and bombings, because you thought you were on the verge of overthrowing the US. Bryan Burrough's "Days of Rage" goes into intensive detail on it.
One of the problem with leftist violence is that it is being committed in leftist(democrat) run states and cities where criminals are released back onto the streets, where gang bangers are practically revered, police are defunded and crime is out of control.
The Democrat party shares a great deal of responsibility for excusing the violence during the George Floyd riots, ANTIFA riots and now for terrorist attacks against tesla dealerships as well as private owners.
The Democrat party has been infiltrated and take over by radical left wing extremists and post modernist neo-Marxists. Both ideologies espouse violence as a means for revolution.
For more than a century, the overwhelming majority of political violence and property damage has been organized and executed by the radical left.
By inviting DW Griffith to show the premiere of Birth of a Nation at the White House, Democrat President Woodrow Wilson encouraged and fueled racial hatred, segregation and political violence by the Ku Klux Klan in hundreds/thousands of cities and towns nationwide.
Just five years ago, Democrats and left wing media in Minnesota and nationwide falsely claimed criminal George Floyd was murdered by racist police in Minneapolis (when he died from a fentanyl overdose while in police custody), and organized violent race riots in hundreds of US cities, while Kamala Harris started go fund me website to bail out and provide legal defense for the scum bags who were arrested.
Meanwhile, Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, Maxine Waters and dozens/hundreds of other Democrats in Congress have publicly threatened Donald Trump, his supporters and a Supreme Court Justice, followed by at least three attempted assassinations of Donald Trump.
While Biden and many/most of his cabinet members falsely claimed while supremacists and MAGA supporters caused most political violence in the US, the evidence has clearly documented that left wingers are responsible for the vast majority of political violence in the US.
Oh look.
Turns out the guy who tried to bake Shapiro was a prog after all.
Pa. Gov. Shapiro was targeted for ‘what he wants to do to Palestinian people’: warrant
Every violent incident in America in the last decade was cooked up by the Democrats and the progs. And yes, that includes J6.
Sorry, J.D. but these are not JUST political disagreements, unless you consider the American Revolution or the Civil War to have been political disagreements!
Violence in the form of war has always been mainstream and acceptable in the defense of liberty when your liberty is being infringed upon with force, whether by government agents or by other private individuals or groups. In this case all other nonviolent options have been foreclosed by those who captured government power for their own purposes. Some who use violence now are wrong, as in the case of the socialists who, having imposed socialism on everyone over the last hundred years now seek to prevent the undoing of socialist institutions now.
How many right wingers are openly calling for violence? How many are assaulting people for their car choice? Burned down cities? Beat people over the head with bike locks? Set fire to homes while families sleep on them?
Screw you and you 'especially on the Left'.
>Recent months have seen assassinations and attempted killings, attacks on political headquarters, arson against Tesla cars and dealers, and other acts that make it clear that some people have gone beyond hardened political hostilities to assaults on people and property. Worse, Americans—especially those on the political left—seem increasingly open to violence as a means of settling ideological disputes.>
That is all, literally, from the Left.
So yeah, you're damned correct the Right is starting to consider hitting back.
Where has "J.D. Tuccille been?
The left has been employing violence to achieve their insane goals for well over 100 years.
Lenin used violence.
Stalin used violence.
Hitler used violence.
Mao used violence.
Castro used violence.
They all used violence to gain and maintain their power over the masses because without violence, the left would be irrelevant as fins on a car.
The one time a right winger claps back and they're all 'Pinochet was a monster!'
Well, at least the helicopter rides were fun for most of the people onboard.