Mississippi Is Ditching Its Income Tax. Other States Should Follow.
The poorest state in the nation just passed bold tax reform that empowers workers, attracts investment, and simplifies the system. It’s a model worth copying.

After months of politicians fighting, Mississippi has joined a small club of nine other states in passing legislation eliminating the state income tax—an outcome that will benefit Mississippians and hopefully encourage other states to follow suit.
House Bill 1, also known as the "Build Up Mississippi Act," will phase out the Magnolia State's income tax. Introduced by Rep. John Thomas "Trey" Lamar (R–Senatobia), the bill was transferred to the state Senate in January and amended last month to make its offerings more affordable and thorough. The persuasions were strong enough to flip the state House's previous stance on nonpassage, allowing Gov. Tate Reeves to sign the bill into law on March 27.
"I believe in a simple idea," Gov. Reeves remarked upon signage, "that government should take less so that you can keep more." The new legislation will gradually lower Mississippi's state income tax, currently sitting at 4.4 percent, to 3 percent by 2030. Further annual cuts depend on "growth triggers" linked to state revenue. This strategy will economically empower citizens and make the state's government more responsible. Mississippi proved that ambitious reform can occur, and other states should take similar action.
States with low-income taxes enjoy greater economic prosperity. Just compare Texas, which has no personal income tax, and Oklahoma, which has a top rate of 4.75 percent. Last month, the Tax Foundation found that Texas' economy grew roughly 35 percent faster than Oklahoma's over the last two decades, with Texas' personal incomes and gross state product being notably higher too.
A 2008 longitudinal study that analyzed economic growth in the States from 1964 to 2004 found that states with higher income taxes stifled economic growth, entrepreneurialism, and access to capital. Since Mississippi announced its cuts, Oklahoma's governor wants in on the change.
Low income tax makes states a magnet for investment. As noted by the Mississippi Center for Public Policy (MCPP), since the state reduced its income tax to a flat 4 percent in 2022, the Mississippi Development Agency reported a whopping $25 billion in inward investment. Businesses often consider tax burdens when deciding where to establish operations and maximize gains, while workers are drawn to areas where they can retain more of their earnings. According to interstate migration data by the U.S. Census Bureau, Americans flocked to low-tax states like South Carolina and Idaho in 2024. That same year, states like Florida, Tennessee, and Nevada—all with no income taxes—saw some of the strongest economic activity in the country.
As Mississippi stagnated in population growth last year, politicians hope this new economic relief will mobilize residents and ease aching wallets. Less income taxes can stimulate local economies by increasing consumer spending. States with lower income taxes typically have lighter tax burdens, meaning more take-home pay can be saved or reinvested in neighborhoods through everyday commercial purchases.
As the poorest state in the union, every dollar earned and kept in Mississippi is critical for survival. With time, a sizable cash flow can reinvigorate the overall financial situation and raise income per capita.
However, critics of the new legislation aren't focused on its potential, instead pouncing on a typo in the text. This error would dissolve the income tax sooner than intended, but there would still need to be a preceding surplus for every cut.
This oversight is an asset. Mistakes allow for increased flexibility and democratic debate regarding how states should enact tax policies and craft more ideal, air-tight rules. Suggestions and corrections can be issued with future legislation, like Mississippi's Senate Bill 3095 to cut grocery and income taxes, and other states can use these instances to draw public awareness to pressing state issues. As MCPP CEO Douglas Carswell wrote, "The revenue trigger still prevents reckless cuts that would harm the state's fiscal health."
Mississippi's new law embraces healthy competition, fiscal responsibility, and generational transformation. As states with low-income taxes have the best economic outlook, minimizing or abolishing the income tax is a growing trend. Other states should learn from Mississippi and forge more economic freedom for their residents.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Won't someone please think of the CPA's.
The BUM Act, known in come circles as The Don't Say CPA Act, unfairly discriminates against bureaucracy-oriented individuals.
Congrats, Mississippians(?).
^this
No word on what the property taxes are like in states without income tax.
Tax on an old refrigerator box is minimal, so you’re good.
They should do away with property tax. You should not lose your home because that.
But yeah, if you don’t cut spending the money will come from somewhere.
it's funny, Texas has no income tax but instead they use property tax to milk the middle class, while handing the 0.1% a shit ton of tax breaks and loop holes. I suspect this is what MAGAs in Mississippi will do, and a year after the plan goes into effect they will blame the democrats on the 5 billion dollar budget gap lmfao and act like they didn't just destroy their tax base. Also please note that texas is near the middle on tax load on average but is top 5 tax load if you carve out the top 10%, follow the money and you will always see what the grifters are up to.
Income tax = slavery
The income tax didn't vanish. Your implication that it did is typical misleading click-bait journalism.
I saw no mention of reduced spending. Two possibilities:
* The same bill also cuts spending in baby steps.
* Some other taxes are raised in baby steps.
I saw no actual numbers.
4332% of Mississippi's state revenue is from the income tax. I doubt they're eliminating 1/3 of the budget. Where's that money coming from?ETA: fixed typo.
You would think someone identifying as "Stupid Government Tricks" wouldn't forget option No. 3:
* The books get juggled so that there's more Federal Spending in the state.
You're right. I wasn't thinking stupid enough.
A man's got to know his limits, and obviously I blew that one.
Missouri's legislature is also considering reducing or eliminating the state personal income tax, but they're currently a bit bogged down in arguing / discussing the best way to keep the state's budget balanced after doing so - whether they need to lower spending, find additional various revenue streams, or some combination.
I thought decreasing taxes was “un libertarian?”
Amazing how Individual States in the Union can eliminate income tax and the [Na]tional So[zi]alist Empire in D.C. struggles to prevent bankruptcy while stealing more than half of your earnings. Course State capitals full of politicians probably aren't sucking up 5 times more than everyone else within States while producing absolutely nothing.
What horseshit. Mississippi is currently among the states that is most dependent on sales tax and on federal transfers (much of which goes to plantation owners). Not on income tax (which generally targets the middle class) or property tax (which generally targets the wealthy). One big reason they are basically a third world state with no economic infrastructure and no growth potential at all. That's not going to change by eliminating income tax. MS has shitty roads, dams/levees, water, sewage. An aging electric grid and purely average energy costs/infrastructure. The worst educated people at all levels with the highest disability rate, the lowest workforce participation, and the worst health. The only thing it spends a lot of money on is imprisoning a higher % of its population than Cuba, Russia, Iran -everywhere except El Salvador. There are no Fortune 500 companies and the two largest employers are a chicken farm and retail tires.
On what planet do they have a positive economic future based on lowering income tax?
"On what planet do they have a positive economic future based on lowering income tax"
Earth. Over and over and over again.
No significant employer will be moving to MS anytime soon. In 30 years, it will still be the poorest least educated least healthy state with even crappier infrastructure than now. All while taxing the poor and sucking at the federal tit.
The author was really dumb to compare the growth of Texas and Oklahoma. Of COURSE Texas grows faster than Oklahoma; it's a mammoth state with dynamic mega-metro areas. All Oklahoma has are a couple middling-size cities. No corporation in its right mind would choose to locate in Oklahoma City or Tulsa instead of Dallas or Houston or San Antonio or Austin.