Colossal Biosciences Resurrects Long-Extinct Dire Wolf
Next up are woolly mammoths, dodos, and Tasmanian wolves.

Dire wolves went extinct around 12,000 years ago, at the end of the last ice age. Weighing around 150 pounds, they were about twice the size of today's gray wolves. Dire wolves roamed both North and South America, preying on ancient horses, camels, sloths, and bison.
Colossal Biosciences, the private company aiming to bring back from extinction the woolly mammoth, announced today that it had produced three dire wolf pups using genetic editing and cloning. The researchers at the company extracted and sequenced the genomes of dire wolves from a 13,000-year-old tooth from Ohio and a 72,000-year-old skull from Idaho. The researchers then made 15 key edits in gray wolf genomes to more closely match the genomes of dire wolves. The nuclei of the edited cells were then inserted into the enucleated dog eggs that were installed in the wombs of surrogate mother dogs. The result was the birth of four dire wolf pups (one died 10 days after birth).
The two six-month-old male pups are named Romulus and Remus, after the founders of Rome who were raised by wolves. The two-month-old female is Khaleesi, a title from Game of Thrones. The new dire wolves have thick white coat and are bigger than gray wolves, with more powerful shoulders, wider heads, larger teeth and jaws, and more muscular legs.
Currently, the wolves are living on a private 2,000-acre facility at an undisclosed location in the northern United States. Some native nations have expressed interest in eventually providing land where dire wolves can once again roam freely.
Colossal Biosciences continues its work to bring woolly mammoths, dodos, and the Tasmanian wolves back from extinction.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Oooh, I know! Let’s bring back dinosaurs!
Please Noone would pay to see resurrected dinosaurs
Dinosaurs are still here with us today. They are called birds.
That’s overly simplistic.
It's as close to be a true fact as charliehall! is capable of. Give it a tiny, tiny bit of slack, just this once.
I thought they were called Mitch McConnel and Nancy Pelosi.
Ever hear of alligators and crocodiles?
Some native nations have expressed interest in eventually providing land where dire wolves can once again roam freely.
Sure. Why not.
Quiet now, I want to try a mammoth steak.
Since the 1950's Explore's Club's woolly mammoth mummy dinner turned out to be Sea Turtle you may be the first since the late Bronze Age.
After MasterTheif's and your debunking below, I'm guessing it will taste juste like elephant.
I have no problem with cultivating these animals for zoos, pets, whatever but the idea of releasing them into the greater environment is an anathema to our already severely troubled property rights system.
Providing land, like the fucktards in Denver provided land for the reintroduction of gray wolves--out in western Colorado, nowhere near where elite idealists live?
I don't see the problem
You don't live amongst re-introduced wolves; that's why you don't see a problem. It's never the urban liberals who have to deal with them dumped into their backyards. It's the ruralites who pets and livestock are torn apart by packs. It's ruralites who are threatened with prison for killing a wolf by protecting a beloved horse or dog.
Bingo. That insanely stupid law almost got me to leave the sate. White ladies in Boulder and Denver forcing wolves onto the icky rural dopes.
I continue to hope some wealthy rancher will introduce and fund a bill to "reintroduce" pedophiles to Boulder and Denver. Who could possibly be so bigoted as to deny them free housing near their prey, just like the Karens did with the wolves?
When I lived in Florida (84-89) a Father shot and killed an alligator that was dragging his 3 year old son into a pond. The child had some damage to his hand but recovered. The animal rights wackos wanted the Father thrown in jail for killing the gator.
Why can't wolves be tracked with tracking collars?
I have seen the movies about this, it will not end well. I, for one, want to be able to use the crapper without fear of T-Rexes making a snack out of me.
I don’t know, reintroducing saber-toothed cats to Boulder could be funny.
I think DC sounds like a good option.
If they are taking suggestions, I’d go along with bringing back the saber tooth pussy cat. Would a dire wolf dare chase it?
Oh, super--let's revive an apex predator that nature marked for extinction, that's twice the size of a regular wolf which are already powerful and vicious as all hell, for shits and giggles.
Dr. Ian Malcom's speech on scientific ethics comes to mind here.
More testing needed!
This isn't like bringing something from 68 million years ago back.
Native Americans had already been in the Americas for at least 8,000 years by the time the Dire Wolf went extinct. The Last Glacial Maximum of the most recent ice age had happened 10,000 to 16,000 years before. The cities of Damascus and Jericho had already been around for 1,500 years in one form or another.
Yeah, but enough of these retro-wolves and a walk in the woods will get more interesting.
I saw introduce them in Europe. Somebody else's backyard is more amusing to me.
The reintroduction of regular wolves has already severely changed the eco-systems where those animals were released. In Yellowstone alone, the elk population has been reduced by 80%. This is likely an exaggerated impact just due to the herds in this area not being hunted. Outside of protected national forest lands, the impact has still been pretty heavy, with a severe impact to hunting grounds in Wyoming, Montana, and now Colorado.
Now I think it is fair to question whether or not hunting grounds should be preserved. Essentially, at some point, humans replaced Wolves as nature's herd-control and in places where we self-limited (national parks like Yellowstone or Rocky Mountain National Forest), the herds cause extensive impact to their environment.
That said, hunters are responsible for some of the most extensive habitat preservation in the nation, with tag fees being a principle source of state budgets. As fewer elk remain, less hunters will hunt...all to promote an idealized "environment" that is just as man-made and fake as the one we lived in 50 years ago. That is, I don't see any moral case of why an environment ravaged by wolves is any more moral than an environment properly managed by hunters. (Certainly, for the Elk, humans are far less cruel than wolves).
The population of elk may have been reduced but that doesn't make it a bad idea. When an apex predator is reintroduced, the effects can be seen all the way down the chain. For example, fewer elk could mean more young shoots growing into trees, meaning more birds and insects and thence small mammals, more absorption of rainwater - meaning that riverbanks erode less, etc.
You people never consider the humans or their animals that are impacted by reintroduction. Livestock loss is bad enough, but lose a beloved horse or dog to the roaming pack and you'll understand why "Smoke a pack a day" is not about Marlboros.
Dire wolves were extincted by humans
Cite?
They were just extincted too early. Need to cross-breed dire wolves and poodles to create a lapdog that tears the neighbors head off.
They weren't 'marked for extinction'.
They were extincted by the human populations they were a threat to.
Humans have wiped out numerous things that preyed on them.
This more stupid and low effort than the idea that mixing their DNA with dog biology resurrects the species from extinction.
Like something sarcasmic or mtrueman would say.
Weighing around 150 pounds, they were about twice the size of today's gray wolves.
No! Where the hell did you pick that up? Game of Thrones? That's not real you know.
Dire wolves were the same height as Northern Timber Wolves, but stockier and more heavily built. At best they weighed 10-15% more.
Anyway, these are ordinary wolves with some Dire Wolf coding added. I'm super stoked and it's a fantastic advance but they are still not the real deal.
Plus, they inherit their cell structure and function from dog cells.
To be fair, male grey wolves can be upwards of 140lbs so 10-15% would get you there. This is more dependent on the latitude than the genetics, though. The further north you go, the bigger the wolf.
The whole thing, along a number of avenues, feels very... suppositional.
Are they feeding these dire dogs raised in captivity sloth, horse, and bison to keep them as near-original as possible? Feeding them modern, North American sloth (not a euphemism for sarcasmic), faster thoroughbred horse, and smaller bison or the kind they preyed upon in the wild? If they catch a rodent, lagomorph, or other undulate like a swine, or even something like a chicken, is someone going in and taking it away from them?
This won't possibly go wrong.
Technologyisms only go right.
It sounds to me like they edited the genes of a gray wolf then had a dog give birth to a larger than normal gray wolf. I'm skeptical that 15 edits on a gray wolf are enough to create the distinct morphplogy and unique genetics of a direwolf. Are the edits individually within the scope of natural variance for the species? What is shown doesn't look like the skull size and shape matches what it should be.
Your right. Dire Wolves were one of the most divergent canids from gray wolves, and 15 edits out of tens of thousands aren't going to do much. Far less than the edit's we already made to wolves when we turned them into dogs.
Some of the edits were cosmetic choices made by Colossal, like the white color. Real dire wolves were probably tawny like a Dingo or reddish like a Dhole.
So once again diversity falls to white supremacy.
Even if they could completely reconstruct a dire wolf genome, there's no way to produce an actual dire wolf.
Trans wolf?
Not yet.
"... don't murder me! I beg of you, don't murder me. Please don't murder me!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uejAhCMzK20
What does a Grateful Dead fan say when he runs out of marijuana?
Answer #1: "This band sucks."
Answer #2: Trick question, he fell into a giant bong as a child and the effect is permanent.
lol they're my cup of tea.
It's like a cross between a hurricane and a ship that's run aground.
How does this outfit generate revenue? Is there a consumer demand for giant wolves? Why do I feel like USAID is lurking in the background?
Sell “Dire Wolves” as pets.
Probably USAID or it's Big Big Game Hunter
'Colossal Biosciences Resurrects Long-Extinct Dire Wolf--Next up are woolly mammoths, dodos, and Tasmanian wolves.'
Cool. Then we can play Jurassic, er, Pleistocene Park.
Bringing any species back from distant extinction, by necessity, means introducing them as an alien species into a completely different ecosystem than they originally adapted to. Either, they will fail to thrive in the new ecosystem, or they will become invasive species. How does that make any fucking sense in a political and conservationist environment that actively works to avoid introducing invasive species, and even seeks to eliminate them when found?
This also make no sense as man has been gobbling up the habitat of many species and it seems unlike there is any real space for the Dire Wolf.
Idiot. The last Tasmanian Wolf only died in 1936.
It's hilarious that you think this is a germane response. And the irony of you calling them an idiot is the cherry on top.
Difficulty with reading comprehension much? I distinctly wrote, "distant extinction," with context clues indicating that I was referring to ancient extinctions; not contemporary extinctions.
So you would be okay if we brought back the thylacine? It would be a challenge, because they aren't that close to other species (they were in their own family), but maybe we could use Tasmanian Devils.
I'm still hoping there are remnant populations in New Guinea.
To quote Jeff Goldblum from Jurassic Park
"Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
Or, to put it another way, why the fuck would you do this?
See below.
"Because FYTW. Plus it gives us a nerdgasm."
Jurassic Park *plus* Dungeons and Dragons? Who could resist?
https://www.dungeonsolvers.com/bringing-to-life-the-dire-wolf-a-comprehensive-guide-for-dd-5e/
PS - Am I really the first to flag the Dungeons and Dragons connection?
Yes, and I am delighted that you did.
What could possibly go wrong.
Just 15 edits? I call bullshit on these being dire wolves. These are wolves with a splash of dire.
But they will have the luck of the Dire-ish
When do I get to shoot one?
I'm waiting for a sabre tooth cat or a cave bear, shooting dogs is too easy and just doesn't feel good. It does seem silly to try and recreate an apex predator why not start with a sabre tooth hamster or a were-rabbit first or even a giant beaver maybe
Amazing the effort that will go into reviving an extinct species and how so little effort goes to preventing extinction of the current species.
Listen, if we don't kill the current species in utero; castrate it in its youth; encourage dead-end rainbow magic people lifestyles in their early adulthood; make them so prideful, greedy, guilt-ridden, and hedonistic to the point of DINK; dump so much affirmation on them when they (especially the women) hit the wall; and then thank them for their sacrifice when they seek euthanasia instead of "being a burden" in their old age - then mother gaia is going to global the warming.
(All this is especially great for dealing with those friggin' black people. Why we ever let them off the plantation...)
Sincerely,
-Progressivism.
and how so little effort goes to preventing extinction of the current species.
You are a bien-pensant's bien-pensant. I've never seen anyone as imbued with received opinion as you.
Billions upon billions annually go into preventing the extinction of the current species. It's a global industry. The amount of effort going into resurrecting recently extinct species isn't even a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of what goes into preventing the extinction of the current species
Billion upon billions? Where do you get this idea? Commercial fishing is taking its tolls on the ocean populations. The fact is that people are gobbling up habitat every day. What is worse is the habitat we gobble up we often poison for anything but grass. I now have salesmen coming to my door to offer to treat my yard for mosquitos. Now I hate mosquitos as much as anyone, but I also recall that they are at the base of the food chain for a lot of bats and birds. It is hard to get an exact number, but I have seen numbers as high as $76 billion dollars a year to treat lawns. We don't have weeds and bugs but we also lose butterflies and spiders and many other things.
The Nature Conservancy (TNC): Annual Budget, $1.3 Billion
World Wildlife Foundation: $435 Million
Greenpeace: $153 Million
Sierra Club: $100 Million
Environmental Defense Fund: $140 Million
That's just 5 and already you have over $2 Billion.
Moreover, again, almost certainly what is meant by his quote is something closer to: "how so little effort goes to preventing extinction of animals with traits that we can't otherwise distinguish from surviving animals with different traits".
"Monarch butterflies are going extinct." actually means *migratory* monarchs are becoming more rare. Whether they actually die or just stop migrating isn't clear.
"Grey wolves are recovering after near extinction in the US." actually means grey wolves territorially occupy most of the land in Canada, Alaska, and Asia and parts of the ME, which accounts for some 60-70% of the Earths land mass but are now inhabiting parts of Idaho and Montana again.
It's the SSDD of Spanish-speaking Mexicans or Puerto Ricans in the continental US discovering that they're actually more White, Western, and European than the Slavs who live next door.
Parody.
True.
Vast efforts have been expended with an eye to extinguish the current species. But where habitat sufficient to support the current species exists, the efforts have not worked. Most of central Idaho supplies such habitat—tens of thousands of square miles of it. That is all to the good. Nobody farms or ranches there anyway.
Contrary to remarks above, reintroduction of gray wolves to Yellowstone has delivered much broader beneficial effects to the ecosystem than the stupider members of the hunting and ranching communities comprehend. Fortunately both those communities include also smarter members, some of whom have greatly benefited their own holdings by applying ecological insights their obstinate neighbors unreflectively disapprove.
As usual, what morons do you think you're convincing with your self-righteous stupidity?
Rather objectively, owning and reintroducing wolves doesn't make anyone any smarter than raising and releasing pit bulls or German Shepherds. It's not like the ecosystems of Yellowstone and/or central Idaho were on the verge of collapse without the wolves.
You're like the retarded people carrying around Chihuahuas and Yorkie Poos in their hand bags except immensely more stupid, arrogant, and oblivious.
Its a very expensive grey wolf.
I predict dire consequences...
seems more like designer dog than dire wolf
Bring on the woolly rhino, cave bears and short-faced bears, machairodonts, barburofelids and nimravids. I want them all!
I'd be more impressed if they could create werewolves.
....meanwhile, in a remote laboratory in Transylvania...
Very bad idea, unless you can breed fear of humans into the animals.
In CA now, camping is dangerous; catamounts, bears and coyotes are protected and are now a danger to humans.