Puerto Rico Pays More For American Energy Than Its Neighbor
Because of the century-old Jones Act, U.S. citizens in Puerto Rico must use overpriced, outdated ships to import American LNG—while the Dominican Republic enjoys cheaper energy from the same source.

Crowley Maritime, an American shipping company, recently announced that it raised the U.S. flag on a 31-year-old French-built LNG carrier to comply with the Jones Act—a 100-year-old law—finally allowing for U.S. LNG to be shipped from the U.S. mainland to Puerto Rico through a loophole in the protectionist law.
A Major Problem With Minor Relief
Over 100 years ago, Congress passed the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, better known as the Jones Act, requiring all goods transported between U.S. ports to be carried on ships that are built in the United States, owned by U.S. citizens, crewed by Americans, and flagged under the United States. While support for the Jones Act was built on maintaining a strong U.S. maritime industry and protecting national security, it has failed to live up to these promises.
Due to absurdly strict requirements, the Jones Act increases the cost of shipping and ship manufacturing by limiting competition in domestic markets and even inspiring collusion. These inflated costs have historically made it impossible for Puerto Rico to import LNG from the United States. Unlike the mainland, Puerto Rico can't import LNG via trucking or rail and must instead import LNG using Jones Act carriers (which, until recently, didn't exist).
There is, however, a minor workaround. The U.S. Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1996 grants coastwise authorization (which is required for transportation of U.S. LNG to Puerto Rico) to foreign ships built before October 19, 1996, so long as they meet the remaining Jones Act requirements. This technical exception allowed Crowley Maritime's recently purchased American Energy, an LNG carrier built in France in 1994, to finally start supplying LNG to Puerto Rico.
This technicality offers a raindrop of relief to Puerto Rico, but it does little to address the financial costs of the Jones Act.
Shipping to Foreigners is Still Cheaper
While Puerto Rico's economy is strangled by inflated costs because of the Jones Act, the Dominican Republic is free from its restrictions, and it imports U.S. LNG at a fraction of the cost. Global markets are much more competitive and have access to modern, efficient LNG carriers. As a result, shipping prices are dramatically cheaper.
In the most recent Maritime Administration operating cost report, it was revealed that "U.S.-flag crewing costs were roughly 5.3 times higher than foreign-flag vessels in 2010" and a recent post on X by Sen. Mark Kelly (D–Ariz.) shows that the cost of operating a U.S. flagged vessel is 4.3 times higher than foreign ships—$8.5 million more.
The Dominican Republic is able to use more efficient and cheaper foreign LNG carriers that have had transportation prices as low as $3,500 per day in 2025. Even their most recent estimated operating costs of $15,000 per day pale in comparison to the estimated $64,500 per day in operating costs alone for the U.S.-flagged LNG carrier.
Puerto Rico is also forced to pay more for the product itself as a result of the Jones Act. A 2020 contract between the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA) and Naturgy (a major energy company in Puerto Rico) includes a provision that states, "If the Jones Act is repealed, or amended such that it does not apply to shipping LNG from the US mainland to Puerto Rico, or a waiver of the Jones Act is granted that permits shipping from the US mainland to Puerto Rico without complying with the Jones Act," would result in an 8 percent unit price reduction.
"American Energy" Isn't the Answer
Crowley's new ship is not a long-term solution. The vessel is old, has a smaller than average shipping capacity, and is only Jones Act-approved because of a loophole. This is not innovation; it's desperation and it shows to what extent Puerto Rico has to go to receive relatively cheap American energy.
Rather than modernizing our maritime fleet to be competitive on a global scale, we're instead buying unwanted vessels from other countries and celebrating them as innovative solutions. In truth, American Energy is a reminder that the United States citizens in Puerto Rico are being exploited because of a century-old law that has done nothing good for us.
The problem is the Jones Act, and the answer is repealing it.
It's time to stop patching holes in a sinking ship. The Jones Act is a policy failure that has harmed the people of Puerto Rico for over a century. The truth is that Puerto Rico should not have to rely on legal loopholes to access American goods. Foreign nations should not have cheaper access to American products just because they aren't bound by U.S. laws. Repealing the Jones Act isn't radical—it's necessary, and it provides immediate benefit to the Americans in Puerto Rico.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Given Reason's fixation on this topic, we should rename it The Jonesing Act.
But no other social-political dysfunction for energy supply and cost in Puerto Rico, right?
LOL. Good one.
You know what Puerto Rico could do? Try being a bit more self-sufficient
How dare you!
Self-sufficiency is racist white privilege and capitalist colonialism.
I question why Puerto Ricans can't man the LNG ships built in the US. He doesn't say that there is a lack of financial incentive to build the ships (or use old stock) in the US. The issue seems to be that American crews are too expensive compared to thirld world labor. Would Puerto Ricans qualify under the Jones Act since they're an American territory and would they be cheaper?
This does sound like a silly restriction as implemented, though not in principle. The workaround doesn't make much sense to me.
Puerto Ricans can man the ships, sure, but that isn't going to save any money.
After all, Puerto Ricans are US citizens (have been since 1917), and so are able to legally live and work anywhere in the US. Accordingly, they aren't going to be noticeably cheaper to hire as crewmen than anyone else who is able to legally live and work anywhere in the US.
The same applies to anyone else who can legally crew a ship under the Jones Act. The crewing requirements under the Jones Act are that the officers are all US citizens, and that the ordinary crewmen are at least 75% US citizens, with the balance of the ordinary crewmen being lawful permanent residents of the United States (that is, people with green cards). So literally anyone who can legally work a Jones Act-compliant ship is someone who can legally work at any ordinary job in the US, and thus can demand competitive wages.
On the other hand, the International Labor Organization-set minimum wage for seamen for international shipping is $673/month as of January 1, 2025, or $8,076/year. And the average pay for a Filipino seaman (including officers, experienced crew, and the like) in 2024 was reportedly ₱47,168/month; at the current exchange rate, that's around $822/month, or $9,864/year.
It should be obvious that it's utterly impossible to crew a ship with US citizens and green card holders and pay them less than $10,000/year.
Fair enough. I thought maybe Puerto Ricans are somwhat cheaper
Which is essentially a microcosm of the United States labor issues. It's shocking how much a Chinese industrial worker gets paid compared to their U.S. counterparts, not to even mention the safety regulations surrounding their jobs.
TL;DR: The United States has priced itself out of the international labor market, and is trying to make up the difference with transfer payments to citizens.
What’s up Peanuts?
Fatass Donnie’s stupidity knows no limit. Consider that Nike got hammered on Thursday when a 46% tariff was slapped on their own imports from Vietnam. But by Friday morning the premier from Vietnam quickly agreed to remove all tariffs from their tiny amount of US imports. Donnie quickly reduced that 46% back to zero.
So Nike stock jumped in the Friday bloodbath. Who the fuck won? Nike sure as hell won’t reshore those plants back to the US as is Donnie’s stated goal. Nike “won” because nothing changed.
#Donnie Hoover Smoot Idiot
#SPBP TDS
Donnie quickly reduced that 46% back to zero.
Are you sure about that? I only see Trump agreed to a meeting with Faux Chi Mihn.
You’re right. I’m giving him too much credit. But the implied solution was strong enough to send Nike stock up 5% on a bloody costly day for the USA.
turd, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
You don't understand. Trump truly wants "true" free trade with the world in the form of bilateral zero tariffs. At the same time he's going to raise enough revenue off tariffs to get rid of the income tax. Not only that but those tariffs will raise the prices of imports so much that people won't buy them and will instead buy domestic.
And his defenders see no contradictions there. None at all. Forget doublethink. His defenders are engaging in triplethink.
Boy, that crystal TDS ball you bought has had all sorts of wild predictions this month. I've been bookmarking them, so you better pray they hold up.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Consider that Nike got hammered on Thursday when a 46% tariff was slapped on their own imports from Vietnam.
What about their Uighur slave farms? How did those do?
Nike moved to Vietnam from China.
YOUR LIVING IN THE PAST MAN
No they didn't, you lying fuck. In fact they're still going strong in Xinjiang.
The only place Nike isn't going to build factories is the US:
Peter Schiff Says Nike 'Won't Build Factories' In US, They Will Sell To Countries Like China: A Much Better Strategy Amid Trump Tariffs
Stupid lies like this is why Open Society won't hire you back.
He doesn't even realize it went back up when Vietnam started to have talks for 0% tariffs.
Hey Dylan,
I like your story except for the last two or three paragraphs. They turn it into op-ed instead of journalism, aimed at the choir rather than at a broad readership. Conversion from journalism to op-ed guarantees that I will not post a link.
This seems to be a Reason editorial policy because it shows up everywhere. As a newbie, you may have the opportunity to push back, if only a little, on this policy.
What if they burned garbage? I heard the entire island is made of that stuff.
The island might cap-size. You know? Tip over?
Dave Smith gives a reminder of simple libertarian (Austrian) economics culminating in a scathing criticism of Trump’s tariffs.
This is goofy economics. It doesn’t make any sense at all....This is an indefensibly bad policy and it really could be quite devastating....This is backward and wrong and it demonstrates a real lack of understanding of basic economics from the president and much of his base.
https://youtu.be/CiQ7xewUDcM?t=3750
Quicktown Brainless Shit is a TDS-addled steaming pile of shit who should fuck off and die.
Do you feel shortchanged Sevo? Sucking on Donnie’s tiny nub?
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Speaking of guys who like tiny dinks, you have the self-awareness of Sarcasmic, don't you Buttplug?
Imagine the years of humiliation you could have saved yourself if you hadn't posted child pornography links here.
I’m paraphrasing Marco Rubio on Donnie’s little nub. Also Stormy Daniels.
You know - expert witnesses.
You know who else likes little nubs?
Go on. Tell us about how Rubio saw Trump's penis.
I imagine if it was as small as you claim you'd be his biggest fan.
Trump was able to sneak a peak at Arnold Palmer’s hog.
Saw an interesting legal angle on attacking the constitutionality of the Jones Act. It was enacted before Hawaii and Alaska became states, and the Constitution says, Article I, Section 9, Clause 6 ...
Therefore the Jones Act became unconstitutional after Hawaii and Alaska were admitted as states.
No idea how this would play out in courts, since lawyers argue all sorts of nonsense and get away with it. Would it only be unconstitutional as applied to states, but OK for Puerto Rico, Guam, etc? Would courts revise it on the fly, void it, or what?
Is this one of those "Can god make a rock so big that even he can't lift it" things?
Won't know until the lawyers get done with it. But it is an interesting idea, and I'm sure there are many lawyers salivating over the prospect.
Nah, it's nonsense.
The Jones Act applies to all US ports equally. All it says is that, if you're going to ship from any US port to any other US port, the ship has to:
1. Be owned by Americans.
2. Be built in America.
3. Be crewed by Americans.
That doesn't grant any preference at all to any ports of any US state over those of any other US states.
I mean, some lawyer is going to cry about it being unfair in effect because of Hawaii's geography, and thus a plain rule of general application is really discriminatory, sure. And judges are often enough idiots.
But just because lawyers and judges might pretend otherwise doesn't stop it from being nonsense.
Because ... of course; ALL US ships are outdated and overpriced. /s
Writers at Reason seem to paint a pretty piss-poor picture of the US economy. Perhaps truthful, but settling for the piss-poor picture as a baseline for everything does nothing to fix the piss-poor US performance does it.
Reasons foundation, "SCREW the USA.... FOREIGNERS FIRST!"
There are around 185 U.S. flagged cargo ships in service. In comparison, there are currently around 1250 ships for sale worldwide by just one ship brokerage firm.
Why do you think the US should make literally everything it can? Have you never heard of comparative advantage?
What advantage? According to Reason the US just sucks at making ships and everything else so everything needs to be imported. I'm sure you can figure out why being a liable dependent on others doesn't align well with Individual Liberty and Justice.
Uhhhh. No. Not even Reason is that stupid. Buying imports requires money, which comes from selling exports.
You're kinda new to this concept of trade, it seems.
"which comes from selling exports"
OR .......... MORE DEBT.
And YES Reason is pitching its Zero-Tax 'imports' narrative "that stupid".
It wouldn't be so stupid if they'd acknowledge the BIG issue is Domestic Tax and Regulatory costs.
Because governments (and societies) live on the timescales where your allies become your enemies.
Because one day, those trading partners will cease to exist.
Because that is what resource usage means.
And finally, because items will outlive the value of money.
Duh foreigners are bringing the food trucks Americans refuse to cook in
"Americans refuse to" .........
Precisely the roots of the master issue.
Why wouldn't they "refuse to" with "income security for socialists", ?free? housing, ?free? healthcare, ?free? pony-rides.......
Did anyone really expect Americans to EARN what they consume if they never have too? ... UNTIL their ?free? pony rides literally eat themselves in the process. The precise and obvious reason Socialism/Communism is a zero-sum dead-end game.
Hey, I never got a pony ride!
I'm still waiting for my free pony.
Been reading up on Carney in Canada. It is wild how badly he is owned by China.
Pierre Poilievre
@PierrePoilievre
Carney is compromised by the authoritarian regime in Beijing.
His company owes the Chinese state-owned bank a quarter billion dollars. He protected a Liberal candidate & MP who said a Canadian citizen should be turned over to Beijing for a bounty.
And now we find out he lobbied the Chinese government weeks before becoming PM to "deepen co-operation."
The Carney Liberals can't be trusted to keep Canadians safe. They don't deserve a fourth term.
Carneys business Brookfield has a huge loan from China secured shortly before he entered politics. It was what allowed his business to operate. He still owes on this loan.
Then there was a Canadian politician who openly told his constituents to secure and take his political opponent to a Chinese embassy for a 1M reward, a Carney barely even criticized it.
It is wild.
They are out and out traitors and I mean that literally.
There's a file from CSIS (Canada's CIA) sitting on Carney's desk detailing all the members in parliament who have taken bribes directly from the Chinese Communist Party. There are over 70.
The contents aren't a secret, but the Liberals have refused to release the names. It is believed Trudeau is the one who received over $50 million, probably in exchange for allowing Chinese troops to train here (no, really).
Surprisingly Canada's government funded media has no interest in the dossier, even though the Bloc, PP, Green and Conservative members bring it up every day in parliament.
Unless you watch the Canadian Parliamentary Channel you'd never know that it exists.
That's (D)ifferent!
Yeah, I know it's the Liberal party, but (L)ifferent does not make sense. Maybe (L)iars?
Is there no independent media or popular podcasts up in canada? It is wild that this isn't more well known.
No. There are shitloads, and they all talk about it. But just like in the US, if it's not on cable news then your average boomer hasn't heard about it, and they're still the biggest voter block.
20% of all EU politicians have been accused of what Marine LaPen was accused of. 139 members. Only 2 have ever been charged. Only 1 has been banned from running for election.
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2025/04/02/one-in-five-eu-lawmakers-broke-same-rule-as-le-pen-almost-all-avoided-punishment-report/
2022: BIDENFLATION IS KILLING AMERICA!!1!!11
2025: Shut up about higher prices already. They're for your own good.
SLAP THEM WITH TARIFFS!
#MAGA
btw, I miss Sandra. The MAGA assholes don’t like libertarian females.
I sometimes think Trump really believes that tariffs are paid by the exporter, not the importer. Notice the language that he uses. He says he's going to "make them pay" and he created the "External Revenue Service." I know some of our resident retards like TJ believe tariffs are paid by foreigners. Do you think Trump believes that, or do you think he's just saying so because stupid people like TJ will believe it?
turd, the TDS-addled ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
"The MAGA assholes don’t like libertarian females."
YOU don’t like libertarian females. You hated Sandra. She made your life fucking miserable, continually pointing out your lies.
You were her #1 target.
What the hell is with this crazy retconning?
She hasn't disappeared entirely. She still comes by. You're not safe yet, Plugly.
You’re quite the liar. You MAGA assholes insulted Sandra repeatedly for opposing Donnie.
And I complemented her repeatedly as my favorite poster here. Yes, she parodied us liberaltarians.
But she used humor to make her point. You are only capable of lies and insults.
I get along with Sandra just fine, as she will attest.
In fact there's a pretty good chance she'll show up this afternoon, so this retconning of your relationship is a pretty risky endeavor.
Particularly because she despises you and has constantly called you a liar. You were the #1 target of her OpenBordersLiberaltarian parody.
In fact there's a pretty good chance she'll show up this afternoon
Maybe, but only to point out the identical gaslighting tactics employed by 2022 Biden supporters and 2025 Trump supporters: "Everything's fine! Pay no attention to that massive drop in your net worth!"
#BothSides
Pluggo is probably not as glad to see you as he intimated earlier, I'm afraid. I think he thought that you ran away.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Sandra is a terrible example. A bunch of people can't stand that asshole.
AMAZING you can't seem to realize Biden's SPENDING is exactly why the higher prices are, "for you own good"....
Did you honestly think all that SPENDING just gets washed under the rug???????????????
RU leftards really that F'En stupid?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/msnbc-host-stephanie-ruhle-alleges-trumps-treasury-sec-looking-for-an-exit-door/
Stephanie is smoking hot and a very credible financial reporter.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.
very credible financial reporter.
She regurgitated all the same dishonest Biden administration jobs and economic data you did. And just like you she never said a peep every time it was invariably revised downward.
No wonder you're pretending she was cReDiBLe.
The fact of the matter is that the chances this time around that anyone from the Trump administration is talking to anyone from MSNBC or the Daily Beast, is less than zero. The best that they can hope for in an inside story is catching someone from the typing pool when they're drunk.
Ruhle has no idea what Bessent is thinking. He would never talk to her. She's speaking through her hat.
Stephanie is smoking hot
The only way you would actually mean that is if she was 44 years younger.
MSNBC and "credibility" in the same sentence? Bold move.
What Puerto Rico pays for shipping is made up by what they receive in in Federal funding. 40% of the population is on welfare. If they want cheaper shipping they should vote for independence.
In case anybody is still wondering why John Roberts is so reluctant to go after the lawfare and district court judges.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/do-you-see-pattern
The hinge on the conflict now is the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS), which is led by Chief Justice John Roberts. A whole lot of troubling info about CJ Roberts has blown up in recent days, much of it not exactly new, but buried and ignored by the likes of The New York Times, and its kindred blob mouthpieces. You’ve read in this blog recently how CJ Roberts’s chief factotum at SCOTUS, Sheldon Snook, is married to Mary McCord, involved officially in every lawfare prank against Mr. Trump since RussiaGate, when she was U.S. Assistant Attorney-General for National Security — and who then went on as counsel for Jerrold Nadler’s House Committee Trump Impeachment No. 1, and the J-6 House Committee, both actions of stupendous bad faith.
Turns out that CJ Roberts has been “besties” with Lawfare field marshal Norm Eisen, and for quite a long time, as far back as 2005. Eisen was special counsel on Impeachment No. 1, and chief strategist behind the janky cases staged last year against Mr. Trump by New York AG Letitia James, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, and Fulton County (GA) DA Fani Willis. You can bet that Eisen was at least an unofficial strategic advisor in the Special Counsel Jack Smith prosecutions, too, along with Mary McCord and Andrew Weissmann of Mueller Commission infamy — Eisen, McCord, and Weissmann, the three Nosferatus of Lawfare. Eisen is coordinating most of the current lawsuit action against Mr. Trump in the federal courts.
Several alt-news outlets are reporting that CJ Roberts made two trips to visit Norm Eisen in Prague between 2011 and 2014 when Eisen was Barack Obama’s ambassador to the Czech Republic. The longest visit, a week, entailed a global conference on "American and European rule-of-law issues." Hmmmm. . . what could that possibly mean? Revolver News, Mike Benz on “X”, and a character styled as “The Researcher” on “X” have all reported on the Roberts-Eisen close friendship.
Also turns out that CJ Roberts is a club member at an elite, invite-only club for legal poohbahs called the Edward Bennett Williams Inn of Court, which is indirectly associated with an international Inns of Court network centered in London. (“Rule-of-law,” anyone?) Other members of the EBW Inn of Court in DC. include Judges James (“Jeb”) Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta, all of the DC District — all involved in current lawfare suits — and SCOTUS Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Do you suppose they have discussed any of these matters at their meet-ups, especially after the pass-around of legal beverages? Perhaps even strategized about them?
Doesn’t that make you a little queasy about CJ Roberts’s role presiding over cases coming any day before SCOTUS that have been designed and propelled by his good pal, Norm Eisen? Should CJ Roberts consider recusing himself from any of these pending cases on the SCOTUS docket?
For Real ? ? ?
Oh, yes, one other interesting sidelight: John Roberts has been found listed on the Jeffrey Epstein flight logs of the “Lolita Express” bound for Little St. James Island in the US Virgin Islands, Epstein’s supposed party shack for the celebrity elite. The allegation that the “John Roberts” listed in the flight log is the same as the Chief Justice is officially unsubstantiated. But here it is FWIW.
Of course, no flight log would be required for a jaunt to Epstein’s New York City townhouse, in case CJ Roberts ever ventured up there from our nation’s capital, an easy car trip. It is established fact that Epstein was busy recording the various doings in the many bedrooms of these establishments, arguably not merely for his private entertainment. Is CJ Roberts perhaps under blackmail for any such activity recorded? Lord only knows, just now.
But it’s possible that FBI Director Kash Patel and his Deputy Director Dan Bongino know the answer to this abiding mystery, since weeks ago they assigned a thousand agents in the New York City FBI office to sort out the thousands of pages and other articles of evidence that the office had been suppressing for years until US AG Pam Bondi fired the top agent there, James Dennehy, for withholding it so long. It’s been awfully quiet over at the FBI and DOJ home office in DC since then. Of course, if any referrals are being considered, or any grand jury bound cases being prepared, you wouldn’t want that to leak out, would you?
I also like the photo of Robert's and Clinton hanging out in the ocean at epstien island
I've wondered if Roberts' preposterous rulings are a kind of duress code, like that naval officer who was captured by the North Koreans blinking TORTURE in Morse code in his "confession" video.
Once again, Puerto Rico can leave the US anytime they want.
Then the Jones Act becomes irrelevant. They refuse to do so because they are leeches.
What do Puerto Rico and Dominican Republic have in common?
Two nations America shouldn't care about!
Now that the Haitian menace is more or less gone, DR can just take over the entire island and do their thing. Once America kicks baby bird PR out of the nest, they can either learn to fly or be gobbled up by... hey, DR, want an extra island?
Arrest all the Puerto Ricans and have them sent to El Salvador?
I heard they were all gang members.
Well thats what that documentary musical I never saw was saying
The Jets are in gear,
Our cylinders are clickin'!
The Sharks'll steer clear,
'Cause ev'ry Puerto Rican
'S a lousy chicken!