Trump's New Tariffs on These 3 Countries Look Particularly Foolish
What tariffs on Singapore, Brazil, and Vietnam can tell us about how Trump misunderstands the value of trade.

Many things about the Trump administration's new global tariffs make little sense.
Those tariffs are a huge tax increase on American consumers and businesses—one that will raise taxes by $1.8 trillion and lower incomes by over 2 percent, according to the Tax Foundation's analysis. The White House seems to have used some fuzzy math in calculating those tariff rates. Trump is also, somehow, putting tariffs on countries inhabited solely by penguins—which has, in fairness, spurred robust growth in the manufacturing of memes. It is all very silly and largely self-destructive.
Yet, even by those standards, some of these new tariffs are truly outlandish. In the interest of narrowing down the chaos into a few bite-sized morsels, here are the three country-specific tariffs that make the least sense, based on what Trump himself has said are the guiding principles behind his new trade policies.
Singapore
For weeks, the White House has been using the word reciprocal to describe these new tariffs. "They charge us, we charge them," is how Trump described the tariffs on Wednesday.
If that's true, then the U.S. should be lowering its trade barriers with Singapore, which charges zero tariffs on most U.S. imports. (Indeed, Singapore's very existence is proof of the power of free trade. It has become one of the world's wealthiest nations not because it built a ton of factories or engaged in a lot of protectionist policies but by embracing low tariffs and free trade.)
Instead, Trump is slapping a 10 percent tariff on imports from Singapore. So much for "reciprocity."
You could say the same thing about Israel, which earlier this week decided to eliminate all tariffs on American imports in advance of Trump's tariff announcement. Did Trump respond to that move by lowering all American tariffs on imports from Israel? He did not: Israeli goods are now subject to a 17 percent tariff, per the list published Wednesday by the White House.
Brazil
Trump has repeatedly made the argument that higher tariffs are necessary to eliminate America's trade deficits with foreign countries. A trade deficit is the gap between the value of everything America imports from another country and the value of all goods exported to that same country.
But if that's the goal, then why are there new tariffs on goods imported from Brazil?
America runs a trade surplus with Brazil. Last year, that trade surplus totaled $7.4 billion, and that was a 32 percent increase from 2023, according to the U.S. Trade Representative.
For that matter, America also runs trade surpluses with Australia, Hong Kong, the Netherlands, Singapore, and the United Kingdom—and Trump just hiked tariffs on imports from all of those places too.
So, we can safely conclude that Trump's goal with these tariffs is not the elimination of America's trade deficits. Perhaps more accurately, we can conclude that the White House has prioritized higher tariffs for the sake of higher tariffs and is misleading the public by promising that higher tariffs are meant to reduce trade deficits.
Vietnam
Back in the halcyon days of 2018, when Trump's trade war was focused mostly on China, one of the clear goals was forcing manufacturers to relocate out of that country. Some moved to Vietnam—accelerating a trend that was already underway, as China moved up the so-called "value chain" and lower-level manufacturing shifted to other places.
Imports into the U.S. from Vietnam doubled between 2018 and 2023, while U.S. imports from China were declining.
Trump regarded that shift as proof that his tariffs were successful. "Many tariffed companies will be leaving China for Vietnam and other such countries in Asia," Trump claimed in May 2019, about a year after his tariffs were first imposed. "Thousands of companies are leaving because of the Tariffs."
So what happened on Wednesday? Trump slapped a staggering 46 percent tariff on all goods from Vietnam. As CNBC notes, those new tariffs will hit a ton of clothing and footwear brands, including Nike, Adidas, Hoka, Timberland, Vans, Steve Madden, and more. It will also raise prices for toys and household goods.
Imagine that you're running a company that relocated its supply chains out of China in the years since 2018. You tried to do what the Trump administration wanted. It didn't matter, and now you have to find yet another place to set up shop—or pass along a huge price increase to your customers.
That's the truly mind-boggling thing about the tariffs that Trump announced this week: They seem to undermine some of the very goals that Trump has claimed he wants to achieve. This isn't about reciprocity or lowering trade deficits or encouraging businesses to move supply chains away from potential adversaries. It is just pointlessly, mindlessly destructive.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Trump is just going to finally bring Charlie to justice! Vietnam must turn over Charlie, that guy has it coming.
Tr....truummmm taffifffffsss.... *drink*
*falls down*
Really enjoying watching the seething here by the usual suspects.
Indeed, Singapore's very existence is proof of the power of free trade. It has become one of the world's wealthiest nations not because it built a ton of factories or engaged in a lot of protectionist policies but by embracing low tariffs and free trade.
Nonsense. Trump says tariffs are what makes nations wealthy.
Look at the drunk flail!
Those darned penguins must pay for their defiance of American trade. We will not stand for their blatant disregard & disrespect of our ways. The only good penguin is a deported penguin; and we shall build resorts and hotels on their reappropriated lands. GOD BLESS AMERICA !
If a 'country' is populated entirely by penguins, isn't it safe to say they not only don't likely buy a lot of goods made in America, but also are not really producers of any product that would be subject to tariff?
A 46% tariff on products from Vietnam is a tariff based on the wholesale price of an item, not the retail price. A t-shirt that is manufactured at a cost of $1 but sells for $10 would see its 'cost' increase 46¢, not $4.60. Is that really going to tank the U.S. Economy?
2022: BIDENFLATION IS KILLING AMERICA!
2025: It's only a small price increase. Stop bitching.
Apr 2025 (Black Thursday): It's only a market correction because covid
Hey fag, I’ll bet you thought that was clever.
Hint, it wasn’t. Well, maybe for YOU. But that only maybe impresses worthless drunken retards, like Sarc.
Plus most Viernam-US trade is not an arms length transaction. It's internal accounting from one subsidiary to another within a multinational. There are very few real prices recorded in any of that. In most cases, the multinational simply invents a slew of charges to ensure that the subsidiary profit gets attributed to the entity with the lowest corporate tax rate.
What will become obvious over the next few months is how much international trade is really trade and how much is just internal supply chains.
Yah, more taxes are fine if they're small enough, that's the libertarian credo, eh?
Trump is more than an economic moron. He is an economic clown. I can't wait to see Jesse trying to defend any of this, but especially the penguins. Little does he know, but *I* already know the secret. Lean close and I'll whisper it to you.
TRUMP HATES LINUX.
Jesse read a book about game theory so now he knows more about economics than any economist. And you.... You are an economic fundamentalist who believes in economic dogma like it's a religion lol. You support advantaged trade, not free trade. You support slavery and oppose intellectual property. You want jobs to go overseas because you hate America. You never complained about Biden's tariffs which makes you a hypocrite. And most importantly, you're a poopy-head.
There. I just summarized Jesse's arguments.
TRUMP USES EMACS!!!11!!11!
"It's not Linux! It's GNU/Linux!!!" --Trump
*somewhere, RMS smiles approvingly*
have you ever made money on the side counting chickens before they've hatched?
in case you didn't notice, there is a wolf in the henhouse.
I'll take the wolf over Boehm's sarcposting
Boehm is getting even more shrill and retarded. More and more like Sarc.
Anyone know if Boehm has been hitting the sauce?
He’s probably not going to be given the time or space for any of the plan to work the way it’s theoretically supposed to. That’s the actual problem with all of this. Trumps got two years, if that, to put some epic wins on the board. All against massive political/media headwinds.
Reality is His Biggest Headwind... His Head-Wounds (ass well ass head-winds) prevent Him from seeing that tariff-taxes on the products of penguins have ZERO utility!!!
It is simply about power
Another article from this idiot.
Another comment from this idiot.
I think it's tariffic!
Iwanna say that's a great post!
So even Reason is in on the "tariff bad" propaganda wagon?
The goal of tariffs is to move manufacturing to the USA. As it stands now manufacturers can force American workers to work for less. They say, "Work for $x.xx or lose your job because we will just make our stuff in Vietnam, Mexico, China, etc. to avoid paying livable wages and benefits."
Bingo. Hollow out the middle class, get more crazy commie Dems among the helpless dependent serfs who can't get a decent job because they were all shipped overseas. I'm not blue-collar, but my dad and best friend are, so I sympathize.
Also, as we learned in 2020, it's really stupid and even dangerous to depend on importing everything. It's not so much economics as it's geopolitics and national security. It's a *spectacularly* bad idea for all of our critical electronics to be foreign-made.
Finally, an economy that produces mostly ephemeral, consumable "experiences" generates no lasting value, except for the oligarchs and plutocrats. And that'll get consumed by currency debasement even more rapidly with no actual output to back it up.
manufacturers can force American workers to work for less
They're not "forcing" them to work for less. They're telling them what the actual value of the job is. This is a determinable thing. Way back in the day, I used to work on an assembly line. Know what my job was? A thing is going to come down on the assembly line. Stand it up and point it in this direction (so it could be sprayed with a barcode and product number).
That's it. That was the entirety of the job. It paid peanuts, but they graciously allowed me to listen to my walkman while I did it. I lived with that, because I was under no illusions that standing a thing up and pointing it in a direction was anything but a job of little notable value.
Fast forward a few decades, and bring in automation. It's even less valuable now. Now the robots can pick a thing up and point it in a direction. How valuable is the job now?
The problem is that a meddling government pushes artificial overhead on that job. "You need to pay that person standing the thing up and pointing it in a direction 'livable wages and benefits.'"
Well, sorry, but those "livable wages and benefits" are MORE than what the job is worth. So, they outsource and go find a place where that artificial overhead doesn't exist. And the fact that outsourcing is a viable competitor for American jobs is what keeps American jobs from being generated.
The goal is to move manufacturing to the USA. If we want that to work, then we have to appreciate the value of a job. If we saddle the employer with paying for what are effectively entitlements to the employee - then the employer has no reason to set up shop. At all.
On the other hand, if you want foreign outsourced effectively slave labor - then just admit that so we can talk candidly on the subject. (Most Democrats don't want to admit that's what they want, because they're desperately trying to shake off their history as slavers and racists.)
So the solution is to Tax Americans with Tariffs until employers move more manufacturing jobs to the US and then pay the Americans low wages and no benefits? Because a manufacturing job is only worth Chinese equivalent wages and no benefits?
What MAGA wants is back to the days that a worker could buy a house and support a family on a factory job or 2. If you still get minimum wage and no benefits why not work a retail or gig job and import cheap goods you can afford while paying all these tariff taxes? I don’t think most Trump voters want Chinese type manufacturing jobs along with a Chinese factory worker standard of living.
Because a manufacturing job is only worth Chinese equivalent wages and no benefits?
Yes. If you can't come up with a way to compete with China, then you're not going to be able to compete with China. By our standards, they're cheating. They use slaves, they use sweatshops, they corner cut every place they can. This is what and why we tariff them.
But we don't have to use slaves and sweatshops. All we have to do is recognize the value of a job, and not saddle the job-maker with artificial overhead. The tariffs keep China honest, and America keeps the value of the job honest.
China is terrified of this. As well they should be.
What MAGA wants is back to the days that a worker could buy a house and support a family on a factory job or 2.
I don't know what MAGA wants and I refuse to speculate on it. I'm simply telling you how it is. If a job is worth $3/hr, and the United States Government forces the job-maker to pay his employees more than $3/hr, then the job-maker is either going to pass that on to his consumers, or he's going to tell the government to pound sand. The end result being inflation or outsourcing. Which do you prefer?
THAT'S the real tax. It's not the tariffs. It's the minimum friggin' wage and the mandatory bennies.
It's kinda embarrassing that Boehm either ignored or didn't know about a huuge reason (!) Vietnam is on the list; that is, because China is laundering goods through there and other nations to avoid tariffs. This is a message from Trump to stop. Good or bad, you didn't even mention it, Boehm.
It's kind of embarrassing that you think this is a good reason for a 46% tariff.
It’s even more embarrassing that you don’t.
traitortrump is a moron
these tariffs are what you expect when you put a moron in charge
that said, I think the writer is ignoring, in the case of Vietnam at least, the reshipping of products made in China out of Vietnam, which apparently is a significant 'thing'
And to those who claim these tariffs will build American manufacturing, well, what, by next Wednesday? One does not build a manufacturing base in a week.
Congress needs to retake it's role and overturn all these stupidtariffs.
It is a mistake that he can do it at all
Well well well now this story didn't age too well for you Eric did it? With todays news that other nations are making deals with Trump means...
wait for it....
wait for it.......
wait for it..............
You were WRONG!
God I love it when a REASON made plan fails.