Cops Called on Dad for Playing Catch with 14-Year-Old Son at Park
"What is the end game here? Can you write a citation? Can you take me to jail?"

A few weeks ago, Adam Washington was tossing a football with his son, age 14, at a park in Ardmore, Pennsylvania. Not too far away—but far enough to avoid being bonked by a ball—his wife was pushing their toddler in the swings.
And then two Lower Merion Township Police Department cop cars pulled up.
"I said to my wife, 'I think they're going to come down and give us a hard time,'" Washington tells Reason. "And she said, 'For what?' And I said, 'For throwing this ball in the park.'"
Washington was right. The cops, a man and a woman, got out and approached him. They informed him that someone had called the police to report "two men" playing catch. The male cop asked Washington for his name and birth date.
Interestingly, the female cop already knew his name, because Washington owns a boxing gym in town and he's also a local real estate agent. He had ducked out to the park—which is about 150 feet from his home—for a rare moment of family time between his two jobs.
But that particular park, the cops told Washington, is the "tot lot" and only for kids ages two to five. They pointed to a sign listing the rules; older kids were clambering over the equipment as they did so. Two of the other local parks—which are not only for tots—were undergoing renovation.
"So I can't play at the park with my family?" Washington asked. After all, many families have one child younger than five and another child who is older.
The cops said that being there, playing catch, near little kids, was against the rules. They also indicated that the caller had thought there were two "men" playing in the park, not a dad and son.
Once they left, Washington called the precinct.
"I told them I was the guy who someone had just called the cops on for tossing around a football with my son and I told them I read the rules and there was nothing on them about playing with balls in the park," Washington told Philadelphia magazine, which first reported the story. "And eventually they told me that it's not the ball that's the problem, it's that only kids up to age five are supposed to play in the park. In other words, I'm supposedly not allowed to hang out in the park with my family, since one of my kids is past the age limit."
The police said they were too busy to talk, Washington tells Reason. And yet, they weren't "too busy to send two cop cars to the park."
So he called the township and arranged to speak at their next meeting.
At that meeting, which took place about a week ago, Washington got up to say he didn't think the police should be showing up to enforce park rules. After all, playground rules "aren't laws."
The township said they would discuss the matter, and Washington hopes they do. If not, "I'm going to reactivate the issue," he says, "Because what is the end game here? Can you write a citation? Can you take me to jail?"
His son chuckled at the experience, but Washington maintains he is not done fighting for the freedom to play ball in a park.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Jeff would like to know the address of the tots park.
14? Way too old for him.
The park is only for kids 2-5. That's why the cops were called.
Yes, it's in the article.
OTH, I think sensible people would use a little discretion about whether there were other people there other than his family.
Cops should not be deployed as officious bureaucrats who aren't allowed to think.
But Sam; In my 69 years on this mudball, I've learned that pigs are nothing but "officious bureaucrats" that are incapable of thinking. The miserable cocksuckers should not be deployed anywhere, since they only bother people who are doing things like playing with their sons & daughters. They are afraid of stopping violent criminals but they WILL ruin our lives for the fun of it.
And if parents sent their 2--5 year old children to the park by themselves, someone would call the cops as well.
The cops should have just spent a few minutes tossing the football back and forth with the father and son.
Oh well, I'm sure every park has a Karen nearby with 911 the most-called number in her directory. The one that called in this situation was probably offended by the testosterone emanating from the father and son. Don't cross the Karen in your neighborhood. If you do, she'll scratch a swastika into your Tesla. And you'll deserve it, you fascist you!
CindyF; No kaka. Everything you wrote is god's truth.
Once you reach 6, you are supposed to sit on your ass play video games get fat and work on your future heart disease.
Karen strikes again.
Keep it up Lenore. Appreciate your work.
+
The Dad can't be removed until we ask Tufts it is okay and he gets a trial.
God bless this man.
+
I agree that police are not the best people to enforce park rules, but the park is very small and there is no safe place to throw a football if there are other kids around.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/aB4PR1XdiRLQnx9p8
Agreed. It's just a mask, take the vaccine, just stay in your home.
Everyone you know hates you, dont they.
Molly has no enemies, but her friends dislike her intensely.
Do you let your kids out of the house without a helmet?
Who hurt you?
Not much of a public park if certain citizens can be excluded.
Fuck off evil slaver.
Define safe in this context.
Bet you'd be OK with it if a LGBT Pedo held a drag queen event there though, right?
I bet you’re the kind of person that would call 911 for a dad playing catch with his son.
You'd shut down a tube factory during a flood cuz they only hired non-union. Fuck you evil slaver.
Find the nosy bitch (and I will bet a large amount she has XX genes) and invite her to play catch. Like drill her with the football at 10 feet or so.
I'm impressed you can use a flail with a 10' chain.
So when the kids, aged two to five, are at the park with no one older, I suppose the snitch calls the cops because there are unattended children in the park? Do parents just throw the toddlers over the fence and hope for the best? Can you hire a five year old to supervise the two year olds?
Ah, yes. Pennsylvania; democrats at work, no doubt.
"So I can't play at the park with my family?" Washington asked. After all, many families have one child younger than five and another child who is older.
No, go to your assigned fun zone. You will see another sign that lists pre-approved fun activities.
1) Getting groomed by a pedo.
2) Drug use.
3) Making amends for your white guilt.
4) Killing babies.
5) Giving your housepet to a Haitian (they're hungry).
6) Prostitution.
7) Being raped and murdered by a guy named Jose.
Sincerely,
-Democrats
Vote Blue, get Blue. I have zero pity. This is what they literally asked for.
Petty rules like this, which reached a boiling point during Covid, are a big reason why we have evil orange man again. I laugh whenever I walk through one of these “tobacco free” parks with a pouch of snus in my mouth. If the Karens there only knew. It almost makes me want to light up a cigarette.
Do you actually laugh or just laugh inside
The rules don't have to make sense. In fact, the rule-makers prefer it if the rules do NOT make any sense and contradict each other. Every one of those rules was demanded by someone who said, "There oughta be a law!" at a town council meeting, or was implemented in response to lawsuit-happy gold-diggers looking for deep pockets. The rule-makers are in it for the power and it doesn't bother them at all if this latest controversy gives them an excuse to make even more rules to correct the problems created by the previous rules, kicking the can down the block until the next controversy.
"I am sorry, officer, but my 14 year old identifies as a tot."
Other towns word it as "no unaccompanied adults." lol
To address Washington's comments at the end of the article, I did the 5 minutes of research that both he and Reason failed to do. The Township code is available on their website.
The age restrictions are explicitly part of the law. Enforcement responsibility is explicitly given to the police department. The penalties are a fine of at most $600 and/or removal from the park. Most park rules are in fact laws, they have to be so as to be enforceable.
I won't spend much time opining about the situation itself other than to state that 1) the caller clearly has bought in to the panic that every grown male in the vicinity of children must be a pedophile, and 2) The police don't even appear to have done anything other than take his name and issue a verbal warning.
https://ecode360.com/6529190#6529198
https://ecode360.com/6529190#6529268
Wow. One person read the whole article with comprehension (and an open mind no less) & even did more research.
Guy is passing football with his teenage son. Violation of clearly posted park rules. Someone calls cops. They arrive, tell him he can't play here. (They should have made him leave; its not obvious if they did or not). They didn't beat him, arrest him, fine him, or anything else. What are they supposed to do, ignore the call? If you have a problem with the park rules, take it up with whoever sets the rules. Funny, the 14 year old son is smarter than his dad. Either way, not really a story here; must be a really slow news day.
Kids older than 5, outside, running around, not playing video games with masks on?
Whaaaa..?
"Cops Called on Dad for Playing Catch with 14-Year-Old Son at Park."
The Nanny State run by underworked and overpaid Karens strikes again.
I get the core intent of the park guideline, but the execution and logistical application without regard to logic is mind-boggling to me. What are you supposed to do if you have two children ages 4 and 6, tell them they're not allowed to play together? No exception made when the parks that do "allow" older children are closed? I get it, they're trying to avoid those situations where smaller children might get accidentally hurt by older kids, but this simply doesn't pass the common sense test.
I agree with all the nanny state comments above. But on top of that, the enforcement of these rules is completely arbitrary and bears no relationship to the severity of the infraction. Drink a can of beer on a hot summer evening in Central Park while you're waiting for your stepdaughter to finish track practice, and a police officer WILL issue either a citation or a warning. Shoot up while sitting on a bench in Washington Square Park, and nobody bats an eyelash. In fact, that's one of the attractions - you get falafel at Mamoun's and then you go up to the park to see junkies on parade.
Plus, the other 2 parks were closed.
As long as the Karen blows the pigs, everything is fine.
"fighting for the freedom to play ball in a park."
fighting for the freedom to play ball in that park.
Fixed it for you.
So, the problem isn't the ball. And it can't be the parents, because a child five or under couldn't be there alone. The only thing left that isn't allowed is a human in the 6-17 range?
The PD has time to enforce "park rules" but NOT time to justify it?
Who is authorized to make the rules in a park paid for by us? What are the penalties? Is the court involved?
That's a tiny fenced in park I don't see how they could have even been throwing the ball. It's a residential neighborhood so the street looks perfect to throw a football.