New Case Against Khalil
Plus: Sanders supports deportations, tariff tracker, Panama's Jewish enclave, and more...

Did Mahmoud Khalil fail to disclose relevant information when applying for his green card? The government has stealthily added some new allegations in its case against Columbia graduate student Mahmoud Khalil, who is in Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention in Louisiana for his role in pro-Palestine protests at the Ivy League school.
The government now claims "he had willfully failed to disclose his membership in several organizations, including a United Nations agency that helps Palestinian refugees, when he applied to become a permanent U.S. resident last March," reports The New York Times. "The government also said that Mr. Khalil failed to list his continuing employment with the Syria Office in the British Embassy in Beirut, Lebanon, after 2022." If these allegations are true, they may put the deportation on firmer footing: It is easier for the authorities to argue that the First Amendment isn't a relevant factor when the issue is whether Khalil disclosed relevant information during a green card application.
You are reading Reason Roundup, our daily, morning newsletter.
Get your daily news roundup from Liz Wolfe and Reason.
But even if that is true, the Justice Department has shown its true motivation, even if it may be able to weasel out of the hole it's dug. Since it told The Free Press that "the allegation here is not that he was breaking the law" and suggested that "he was mobilizing support for Hamas and spreading antisemitism in a way that is contrary to the foreign policy of the U.S.," it sure seems obvious that it was Khalil's role in the Columbia protests that attracted ICE agents initially. If officials can now find a better pretense to deport him, that may pass more legal muster, but they already made clear that this is retribution for protest. This will have a chilling effect on speech. And if they legitimately believed he was a threat, they should have actually spent the time to substantiate this.
As for what actually happens to Khalil, it's not clear these new allegations will make much of a difference: "In order to deport Mr. Khalil on the basis of the new allegations, the government would have to convince an immigration judge that any failure to disclose the relevant information was willful, and that it would have made a difference in his chances of receiving legal permanent residency status," reports the Times.
Scenes from Pedasi: Was surfing in Panama and came across this:
Did not realize how large of a Jewish population exists in Panama, and specifically Pedasi--a surfing area along the southern coast. Here's a 10/7 memorial we spotted in this remote enclave in the jungle. pic.twitter.com/gncKa6jbP6
— Liz Wolfe (@LizWolfeReason) March 24, 2025
More background here, from Forward.
QUICK HITS
- Is Donald Trump's weak dollar plan actually working?
- Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.) has come out in support of President Donald Trump's deportation crackdown. This is essentially a return to the position he held a decade ago. "Open borders? No, that's a Koch brothers proposal," he told Vox back in 2015. "It would make everybody in America poorer—you're doing away with the concept of a nation state." ("What right-wing people in this country would love is an open-border policy," Sanders continued. "Bring in all kinds of people, work for $2 or $3 an hour, that would be great for them. I don't believe in that. I think we have to raise wages in this country, I think we have to do everything we can to create millions of jobs.")
Bernie Sanders now saying publicly that he supports Trump's stance against illegal immigration. Rather stunning how the Democrats have moved strongly to ape the Republicans on this. pic.twitter.com/nvWOPR4fUU
— Phillips P. OBrien (@PhillipsPOBrien) March 23, 2025
- Ro Khanna ascendant?
- Finland, Denmark, and Germany have issued travel warnings to their trans and nonbinary citizens, cautioning them that they must now state either "male" or "female" on official travel documents if attempting to come to the U.S.
- A weird consequence of an expected Trump travel ban: Cuban and Venezuelan pro baseball players (P-1 visa holders) might no longer be allowed to exit/enter our borders.
- An excellent thread from recent Just Asking Questions guest Kelsey Piper on how American abundance is out of reach because our politicians and bureaucrats make it illegal to build. And here's that JAQ episode; if Piper's not on your radar, you're missing out.
- "If Mahmoud Khalil is charged and convicted of an actual crime he should be deported," writes Eli Lake on X. "If his 'crime' is just the expression of support for a terrorist organization, then this pageant is grotesque. And yes I realize that [Columbia University Apartheid Divest's] harassment of Jews, destruction of property etc. is not protected speech. But the legal argument thus far amounts to saying permanent legal residents can't say anything that the Secretary of State believes undermines US foreign policy. That's a horrendous violation of free speech. And as much as I despise campus solidarity with baby stranglers, I love American values more." I agree: The specifics of what Khalil did to "support" Hamas—beyond speech—really matter. The government doesn't seem to have a very good case here.
- Bloomberg has an awesome tracker tool where you can look at how every single Trump tariff—or threat of tariff, or suspended tariff—has affected the economy.
- Important to ban cell phones in schools says Health and Human Services secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr….but it's because of "electromagnetic radiation." You were so close, RFK Jr.! You almost had me! Most reasonable people probably agree that phone use in school is bad—kids need to be learning, not scrolling social media. But you just couldn't stick the landing, ya big ole kooky bear-dumper.
- Bad omen:
This week, a math professor at MIT told me that incoming students are, on average, noticeably worse at math than they used to be.
Harvard, of course, just added a remedial math class, Math MA5, "aimed at rectifying a lack of foundational algebra skills among students". https://t.co/crqrw1jw78
— Patrick Collison (@patrickc) March 23, 2025
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Did Mahmoud Khalil fail to disclose relevant information when applying for his green card?
Sure. Let's go with that.
I don't really care, Margaret.
So true. The hamas homie lied on his federal forms. C-Ya!
Isn’t the UNITED STATES a member of the United Nations?
Hard to tell these days I know, as the US violates it’s sworn signatory oaths to the United Nations genocide convention.
Refuted.
Not for long hopefully. Pack of genocidaires pretending it was really teh Joooz.
Also, refuted.
This^
Pretty much this, yes.
When you're knee-deep in feces after a septic incident - any tool works.
The government now claims "he had willfully failed to disclose his membership in several organizations..."
They Al Caponed him!
I bet he also fudged his tax returns.
It is easier for the authorities to argue that the First Amendment isn't a relevant factor when the issue is whether Khalil disclosed relevant information during a green card application.
Time to zero in on that "Hates Jews" tick box.
Wasn't that box for expedited admittance under Biden?
If officials can now find a better pretense to deport him, that may pass more legal muster, but they already made clear that this is retribution for protest.
Kicking out that guest who kept pissing on my rug did seem a bit retaliatory, now that I think about it.
The Dude abides.
Shut the fuck up, Donny.
Donny was a good bowler, and a good man.
Goodnight, sweet prince.
Fuck it Dude, let’s go bowling.
What's a pederast, Walter?
Sarah Palin’s Buttplug.
Ha. Him and Jesus Quintana need to start a team.
Name of said team?
Balls Across the Nose? Pinsgender? Gutter Tramps?
Balls Across the Nose?
Get 'Em Before The Balls Drop
Diddler on the roof
You're out of your element
Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules.
Let's compromise and just send him halfway home.
Or half of him.
It really tied the room together.
What tied the room together, Dude?
Now that Fist has had his chance...
"And yes I realize that [Columbia University Apartheid Divest's] harassment of Jews, destruction of property etc. is not protected speech."
How about we just give Kahlil the same treatment as Jan 6 protesters? Shoot him in the face, or send him to dankest prison for longest time possible?
Exactly. It's amazing the amount of time everyone is wasting on this terror supporting ass munch.
Or just deport him.
Can we meet them half way and drop him out of the plane mid-flight at 15,000 feet?
Compromise and deport him halfway?
Or just deport him.
Fist? But he's a national treasure.
MY PEOPLE CAME HERE ON THE MAYFLOWER.
MY PEOPLE CAME HERE VIA BERINGIA.
(Well, only 18.75% did... but One Drop, Americans, amirite?)
Colonizers.
Did they pay a toll at the land bridge?
When did they invent floating moving vans?
Right after floating food trucks. Duh.
Sounds like something jeffsarc could support.
I'm sure sarc sees a (D)ifference in the situations.
Kind of sad Shikha didn't make a guest appearance. But welcome back liz.
We all know that once you step foot on American soil, you can never have your visa or green card revoked. At least based on corporate media the last few weeks. Who wouldn't agree with this?
Post
See new posts
Conversation
Bill Melugin
@BillMelugin_
NEW: CBS looked into ICE Boston claims that illegal aliens charged w/ child rape in MA are repeatedly being released from jail w/ ridiculously low bail. They found that yes, they are, including the following in recent months:
- Guatemalan charged w/ 3 counts of aggravated child rape released on $7,500 bail. (ICE detainer ignored).
- Guatemalan charged w/ aggravated child rape, (victim age 9 or below) released on $7,500 bail. (ICE detainer ignored).
- Honduran charged w/ assault to rape &
masked armed robbery released on his own recognizance with $0 bail. (ICE detainer ignored)
- Worcester County had two illegal alien inmates charged w/ child rape who both received $500 bails.
- Another was charged w/ fentanyl trafficking and released on $4,000 bond before ICE could arrive.
https://cbsnews.com/boston/news/massachusetts-immigrants-charged-violent-crimes/
Too local
These seem like awfully extreme cases to be protecting "all people" from the government. Is Wu trying to turn MA red?
"ya big ole kooky bear-dumper.
Well, he couldn't be expected to keep it in his trunk, could he?
Tim Walz was apparently handing out coins memorialized killing Trump over the weekend.
Liz Collin
@lizcollin
JUST IN: I’m told these disturbing wooden coins were apparently found inside Governor Tim Walz “town hall” event inside a Rochester public school today.
“Bury fascists” and “86 47” the coins say, in reference to President Trump.
PICTURE
https://x.com/lizcollin/status/1903538539087691939
Do they come with a mail-in rebate for tampons?
I think he just offers those for free in the men’s restroom.
They fit in the tampon dispenser coin slot. How'd you know?
He was handing them out?
They are being passed around in the crowd, yes. Are you claiming he is ignorant and had no idea?
Well to be fair, he's so ignorant he's retarded.
He is also weird.
The weirdest thing is actually thinks he has a shot at the nomination in 2028.
He might. Team D lets all sorts of types Walz in and become the candidate.
What nomination in 2028? Wasn't he with the people claiming that if they didn't win then there'd never be another election?
J.B. Sitzpinkler also thinks he's the answer to a question Americans never asked.
You mean Emperor Commodius Maximus?
Are you claiming he was handing them out? From the post it is not at all clear how many of these coins were found or whether Walz would have known about them.
According to the person who took pictures they were being passed around a tim Waltz event.
Are you saying it didn't happen? This is fine if you can prove Waltz himself didn't hand them out? It changes the fact democrats at a tim Waltz event are calling for trumps murders with commemorative coins?
You seem focused on the wrong part here.
Do you have proof of Tim Waltz passing them out beyond the fact that they are there?
I think you're focused on the wrong part. You could be focused on these coins, but instead, you decided to say that "Tim Walz was apparently handing out coins memorialized killing Trump over the weekend."
Does Waltz have a membership card for the coin makers guild? Hmmm…?
As is perfectly clear in my comment, I am not claiming anything. I have no doubt "it" happened, but it's unclear what exactly "it" was and to what extent he supported or approved of it. You are the one who claimed Walz was handing them out with zero basis. I think Walz is a dreadful person with terrible ideas. I'd still like to be accurate in what I accuse him of.
Too easy to false-flag this kind of thing. Just think of all the things dems could do at R events - and they'd have a complicit press to magnify the message.
remember the tiki-torches and fed dressed 'conservative' protest groups?
You said he was handing them out. Just because something is in the crowd, doesn't mean he is passing them out.
It's possible he has no idea unless he was patting everyone down at the town hall.
Okay. Fine. Go with that.
The coins being passed around a tim Waltz event are fine then? Since it can't be proven he knew?
What the fuck is wrong with some of you?
I'm shocked at the number of Waltz supporters here.
I didn't say they were fine. You're making logical missteps.
It's really simple. You could have said that the coins were passed around at his event without saying that he was the one passing them around. He might not know.
And that doesn't mean I support him.
We don't mention that the
emperorPrime Meanster has no clothes around here.No one is supporting Waltz, they are disagreeing with guilt by association. If Walz isn't involved, then he isn't to blame. Same reason as no one blames Trump for Jan 6 around here (less unserious people).
Are you channeling your inner jeffsarc today or something? This is not the level of logical inference I normally expect from you.
Something being passed out among attendees at an event != Support of coins by said organizer/speaker of event
Also, define 'fine' - Morally fine? Ethically fine? Legally fine? I'd go with no, no, and yes respectively.
I find it very strange that the focus is on Waltz and not coins advocating to 86 47.
You're the one that brought him into this! You led your post with him!
It's very possible that he was patting the men down, yes.
Or trying to tamp the men up.
You are the same Leftist dipshits that equate "protest peacefully and patriotically" with terrorism support from the speaker but this is beyond the pale.
I can't remember whether Knutsack is a leftist dipshit or not. But there is nothing in this thread to indicate leftism or dipshittery. Jesse made an eroneous claim about Walz handing out the Trump murder coins. There is nothing wrong with correcting an incorrect statement when you see it. If we want to make good cases against these people, it is worth while to try to be accurate.
Seeing what it takes around here to be labeled a "leftist dipshit", maybe I am.
Support for the constitution and the rule of law will definitely earn that label.
Oppose sending people to El Salvador torture camp prison without a hearing:
WHY DO YOU WANT MS 13 TO RAPE MY GRANDMA???
You support neither.
Edit: unless it helps Democrats.
Walz seems to be trying really hard to make it so history doesn't remember him as just the male tampon guy that might have been VP.
Nah, Walz coins are full of false information...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/walz-issued-congressional-challenge-coin-that-misstated-his-rank
Looks like the balls now in their court:
https://www.rt.com/news/614689-trans-travelers-us-warning/
Not in glass jars?
Not hanging in limbo?
The post op ones can’t be too testy over this.
How dare you assume their gender.
What do balls have to do with gender?
A look at all the political lawfirms in D.C. that had their clearances revoked.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1903464677939851756.html
They’ve been playing partisan politics with who they represent. In addition, one of them, IIRC, is Marc Elias’s law firm. That asshole should never have a security clearance.
By the way, congrats on your appointment as prime minister.
Why thank you. It was a tough election, but worth the effort.
Did you get help from Russia?
Vlad says he's Ukranian.
""That asshole should never have a security clearance."'
Well of course Hillary's bag man is going to have a security clearance.
40% of Democrats think torching teslas is a valid form of protest.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2025/03/39-of-democrats-view-vandalism-against-tesla-as-appropriate-form-of-protest/
"My violence is speech. Your speech (or lack there-of) is violence. I win."
Less than I thought to be quite honest.
Consider that it's mostly Democrats who own Teslas.
More Koreans on Rooftops needed.
We took some visiting Taiwanese guys shooting last fall . We brought up rooftop Koreans. The didn't get the reference and I was a bit worried about Taiwan based on their shooting performance. Fun to see guys who never dreamed of the opportunity to go shooting.
90% of Republicans think vandalizing the US Capitol is a valid form of protest.
And your citations the Capitol was vandalized, Mr. Bears-in-trunks?
100% of Chemjeff's think ten year sentences for "parading", torching drycleaners, historic churches and Footlockers, shooting at opposition politician's ballgames, starting violent rape factory autonomous zones in urban cores, silencing speech on the internet, and using corrupt prosecutors and judges to try an imprison opposition candidates on novel charges is a valid form of protest.
“starting violent rape factory autonomous zones in urban cores,”
Hey now, he’s only ok with these if the rape victims are drunk 14 year olds and if everyone feels bad afterwards.
What if they only blew their load on, rather than in, the child. That's gotta count as extenuating circumstances, right?
Cite?
He’s lying. It’s what he does.
I am holding out that there is a bear in a trunk possessing the citation for his claim.
Are you referencing the May 2020 arson of the Capitol by Leftists like you? Or are you talking about the unguided tour that cleaned up after itself?
Hey, let's be fair, the Feds also smashed in some windows on J6. So, there was vandalism, just probably not by the people jeffsarc thinks about while hate-fucking little boys.
90% of Republicans think vandalizing the US Capitol is a valid form of protest.
Note how Jeffey intentionally groups peaceful protesting and vandalism together - but only when the subjects are on the right. He treated left-protests like BLM completely differently by carefully delineating between peaceful protesters and the supposedly few violent rioters. His goal is always to protect Dems as much as possible and attack Reps s much as possible. and if his principles need to change to allow that it's not like he believes in any principles anyway.
Some 44% of "younger Democratic men" favor "assassinating a political figure who is harming the country or our democracy"
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/stories/poll-finds-support-great-replacement-hard-right-ideas/
https://res.cloudinary.com/splc/images/c_scale,w_896,h_503,dpr_1.25/f_auto,q_auto/v1736737141/partisanship-violence-3/partisanship-violence-3.png?_i=AA
Fortunately, that is only 4 or so people total.
100% of those thinks destruction of property is wrong when the property is theirs.
Is Donald Trump's weak dollar plan actually working?
I'm pretty sure we're not allowed to give him credit for anything.
I'm sure some judge will pop up to force Trump to keep paying almost half a billion to Australian schools.
-------------
https://redstate.com/streiff/2025/03/22/australian-universities-demand-emergency-meeting-after-trump-cancels-their-funding-n2186972
Australian Universities Demand 'Emergency Meeting' After Trump Cancels Their Funding
Australian universities are crying foul after the Trump administration asks questions that put $386 million in research grants in jeopardy. The bone of contention was a questionnaire sent to Australian grant recipients asking if the institution had "ties to communist or socialist parties, receive funding from China and it only recognises male and female sexes."
Australian Academy of Science chief executive Anna-Maria Arabia told the Australian Financial Review the federal government had to be quicker to respond to the cuts rather than choosing to "wait and see".
"It is incumbent on the prime minister to call an emergency meeting of the National Science and Technology Council, which he chairs, compelling all ministers to the table to share intel and comprehensively assess the extent of Australia’s exposure to a reduction in US R&D investment across portfolios,” Ms Arabia said.
"The consequences of inaction are profound with consequences for every Australian’s way of life,” she said.
"We don’t know the full extent of the pain US measures will inflict on Australia, but we do know it’s coming, and we have a chance to put in place strategies that will allow Australia to capture opportunities whilst mitigating the worst of the damage.”
"We don’t know the full extent of the pain US measures will inflict on Australia"
Like, everyone in Australia, or just the usual woke-socialist fringe (and the bureaucrats paid by "overhead")?
The judge along with the fat, childless, post-wall, Rachel Maddow watching cat ladies opposing Trump on this can send their money to those schools.
Why the fuck am I paying for Australian university programs? I dont care if they are woke or not why am I paying?
Agreed. I don't give a flyin' F what it's paying for. The obscene amounts of our tax money going all over the country and all over the world for God knows whatever has got to stop.
Because 80 million ballots voted for Sloppy Joe.
""The consequences of inaction are profound with consequences for every Australian’s way of life,” she said."
LO f'n L No, just her and her friends.
It Fosters good will
Europe can stay at home and enjoy their Muslim enclaves.
https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/britain-beefs-up-travel-warnings-over-us-border-enforcement-2025-03-20/
Britain beefs up travel warnings over US border enforcement
I bet they have awesome food trucks.
Only if they are total electric - - - - - -
The only thing edible are the tyres.
Math skills? Given that the primary purpose of Harvard (and Princeton and Yale) is to "educate" the next generation of government leaders, actual math skills would be an impediment.
Little bit of a surprise for MIT, though.
That's what you get when you put a cap on Asians.
I thought it was the jews that had little caps
I thought Misek wanted to put a cap in them
In one day he would destroy 500 yamakas... Not to mention the jews that were under them
Props mell brooks
3 jems in a row
I don't think it is a coincidence that the incoming freshman university classes would have started high school at the time of the covid lockdowns. We are only now going to start seeing how we willfully destroyed a generation for... reasons.
+1 Zoom Call
Jeffrey Toobin is pulling for that.
They have at least learned that math is sexist and racist.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.) has come out in support of President Donald Trump's deportation crackdown.
Bernie likes the idea of an iron curtain, but instead to keep people out.
Bernie just likes the idea of check points and border guards in spiffy uniforms.
Or is that AOC?
AOC: Can I ask a stupid question?
Trump: Better than anyone I know.
😉
Always orange man bad...
CBS News: Trump administration to discontinue humanitarian-based immigration programs
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/u-s-to-revoke-legal-status-of-over-a-half-million-migrants-chnv/?ftag=CNM-00-10aab7e&linkId=779786850
U.S. to revoke legal status of more than a half-million migrants, urges them to self deport
The Trump administration will be revoking the legal status of hundreds of thousands of Latin American and Haitian migrants welcomed into the U.S. under a Biden-era sponsorship process, urging them to self-deport or face arrest and removal by deportation agents.
The termination of their work permits and deportation protections under an immigration authority known as parole will take effect in late April, 30 days after March 25, according to a notice posted by the federal government.
The move will affect immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela who flew to the U.S. under a Biden administration program, known as CHNV, that was designed to reduce illegal immigration at the U.S.-Mexico border by giving would-be migrants legal migration avenues.
A total of 532,000 migrants entered the U.S. under that policy, which was paused soon after President Trump took office, though it's unclear how many have been able to secure another status that will allow them to stay in the country legally.
OTOH, CNN last year:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/05/politics/biden-administration-immigration-nicaragua-cuba-venezuela-haiti/index.html
The Biden administration won’t extend legal permissions for certain migrants from Nicaragua, Cuba, Venezuela and Haiti provided through a temporary humanitarian program designed to curb illegal border crossings, requiring them to seek other legal means to remain in the United States, according to the Department of Homeland Security.
The decision comes nearly two years after the administration rolled out a program geared toward Venezuelans seeking to come to the United States, allowing them to temporarily live and work in the US as a way to mitigate surges at the border. The program required that these migrants have a sponsor in the US, undergo screening and vetting, and complete vaccinations.
The administration later extended the program to Nicaraguans, Cubans and Haitians, describing it as a way for migrants to come to the US in an orderly manner.
But the program became a political flashpoint as Republicans have argued the administration was misusing parole authority and have frequently cited the program in their criticism of President Joe Biden’s immigration policies.
By the end of August, nearly 530,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans had flown into the US under the policy, according to federal data. The program is still available to new applicants from the four countries, though the administration briefly paused it this summer over concerns about fraud.
Homeland Security officials maintain the program was intended to be temporary, providing those who arrived the opportunity to apply for other legal status while in the United States. The administration didn’t guarantee the program would be extended, though it did allow re-parole for Ukrainians and Afghans under similar programs.
Parole for certain Venezuelans is set to lapse soon, in line with the two-year program, but it also comes as immigration remains a central campaign issue between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris just weeks from Election Day.
Somehow a temporary program created by executive fiat becomes an ensconced pathway to citizenship that cannot be removed, ever? Even when the temporary program was shutdown by the SAME executive that created it because of rampant fraud?
I'm sure some judge will find an "orange man bad" reason to let 532k temporary visa to become permanent.
----------
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/trump-administration-to-revoke-legal-status-for-532-000-migrants-brought-to-us-during-biden-admin/ar-AA1BqjYv
Last month, a group of parole beneficiaries and sponsors and the Haitian Bridge Alliance — an immigrant rights group — sued the Trump administration over the program’s termination, challenging its legal authority to dismantle “established and Congressionally authorized pathways to the United States” and its attempts to “block” parolees “from seeking alternate legal statuses created and authorized by Congress.”
“Let’s be clear: Suddenly revoking the lawful status of hundreds of thousands of CHNV humanitarian parole recipients is going to cause needless chaos and heartbreak for families and communities across the country,” Karen Tumlin, director of the Justice Action Center, an immigrants rights group, said in a statement Friday.
“The Administration’s targeting of this successful and popular process — one of the last remaining safe and lawful pathways — is reckless, cruel and counterproductive,” she argued, adding that the Trump administration is “breaking a commitment the federal government made to the hundreds of thousands of American sponsors and beneficiaries who did everything the government asked of them to participate.”
The Biden administration launched the parole program in October 2022.
It allowed foreign nationals from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela to fly into the US and stay and work for up to two years, provided they could obtain a sponsor living in the country.
The program, plagued by rampant fraud, was an attempt by the Biden administration to drive down illegal immigration during record surges at the border.
In July 2024, the Biden administration temporarily paused the program after an internal review found that thousands of sponsors for the migrants were listing fake social security numbers or phone numbers and using the same physical address for thousands of parole applications.
“Some 100 addresses were listed on over 19,000 forms,” a US Citizenship and Immigration Services review found, and “many applications were submitted by the same IP address.”
In October 2024, the Biden administration barred migrants enrolled in the program from extending their temporary legal status.
President Trump swiftly ended the program on his first day in office, stopping any new applications from being submitted.
Hmm, maybe we can train a bunch of freedom-loving Venezuelan expats, and orchestrate an invasion of Caracas to overthrow Maduro. Probably land them in a nearby bay, or something.
Ro Khanna ascendant?
Any Democrat pretending to not be a total moonbat will look attractive at this point.
That’s a rather small pool of candidates at this point.
'Finland, Denmark, and Germany have issued travel warnings to their trans and nonbinary citizens, cautioning them that they must now state either "male" or "female" on official travel documents if attempting to come to the U.S.'
Did they warn them about the TSA "fondling" test?
Finland, Denmark, and Germany have issued travel warnings to their trans and nonbinary citizens, cautioning them that they must now state either "male" or "female" on official travel documents if attempting to come to the U.S.
Alternately, the could just not come. We have enough insufferable and entitled people without new ones adding a eurotrash layer.
Basically. "Oh no, Euro trannies won't come over" seems like the lowest tier of possible concerns
Cuban and Venezuelan pro baseball players (P-1 visa holders) might no longer be allowed to exit/enter our borders.
BUT THEY'RE OFTEN THE BEST ONES.
Rusney Castillo's $72.5M contract would disagree.
Crazy someone would pitch this idea. A curveball for those athletes.
Hopefully they slide in ahead of the new rules.
And as much as I despise campus solidarity with baby stranglers...
First they came for the baby strangler bros?
Bloomberg has an awesome tracker tool where you can look at how every single Trump tariff—or threat of tariff, or suspended tariff—has affected the economy.
Useless if it doesn't include the effect on a trading partner's morale.
Laws against terrorism seem redundant, in that terrorism is just crime. But there's lots of redundant laws, so it's no big deal.
Laws against supporting terrorism seem redundant too, just as laws against possession of stolen property or selling stolen property or helping a murderer bury a body seem redundant.
The only room for doubt I can guess beyond that is when a group claims to support a terrorist group, trespasses, blocks students from going to class, litters and makes a mess, uses bullhorns, etc etc etc ... Suppose this group had been claiming to support the Mafia or Jeffrey Dahmer or the Unabomber, doing the exact same thing.
Would that be a crime, aside from the trespass, littering, public nuisance, etc? I don't quite see it ... for citizens. But this guy was not a citizen. He claims to want to be a citizen. Yet he doesn't act like it. And now the government is claiming he lied about his support for a terrorist group on his application.
Yeah, sorry. Not much sympathy. He supports terrorists. Whether that should be a crime itself is a separate question which I don't see anyone arguing.
Raping babies and grandmothers, then beheading them, all while bragging and recording themselves, is beyond all comprehension. Supporting that, trespassing and disrupting campus for that, is beyond my tolerance. Throw them all out. Send them back to where they came from.
I tend to agree. Lawmakers always seem to jump at the chance to make two or more penalties for the same crime. You only need one law, not half a dozen that repeat the same thing.
One of my favorites is this oldie (https://loweringthebar.net/2021/09/assorted-stupidity-147.html)
Look at all the loopholes opened up by all that verbosity! The presumed intent is that travelers who dine and dash are harder to track down. But why only dine and dash -- why not assault and dash too, or any other crime and dash?
Then there's that long list of establishments. Looks like "dine and dash from a bed and breakfast" is OK, as is from a motor lodge.
And it's only "food, fuel, services, or accommodations". If you steal a drinking cup from a store, that's OK. Does a box of Hamburger Helper count as food, since it's inedible as is?
Theft is theft. Why this particular bad redundancy? Why separate laws for robbery, burglary, shoplifting, embezzlement, conversion, and every other synonym from a thesaurus?
Lawyers ruin everything.
I will take a stab at it. Inns and similar businesses are considered public accommodations and therefore have limited legal rights to refuse service and protect themselves from potential fraud. I would speculate that is why fraud against them comes under its own category as running them.out of business by theft is especially bad for the community.
That's a pretty good stabbing arm ya got there!
And now the government is claiming he lied about his support for a terrorist group on his application.
I think we can all agree they went fishing for something and almost certainly jumped the gun before they actually had a justification, but I think we also all knew that there was probably something there to find given that he is a 'spokesperson' for an organization with literal direct ties to foreign terrorists.
The Trump administration sort of lucked out that it turns out this guy is exactly the kind of jagoff that would lie on his forms about his connections to foreign terrorists, because of course he would. Hell, I wondered about that when I first heard about his deportation since it's curious someone who supports foreign terrorist groups would have been admitted in the first place...you know...without lying about it anyway. He didn't suddenly get those opinions after entry into the U.S. we can pretty safely assume.
I'm sure this isn't his first rodeo in terms of terrorist activism since he wasn't 'radicalized' at Columbia I'm sure. It's more like he brought his radicalization to Columbia and spread it around.
And no, I don't fully trust reporting on this from the administration...BUT...just from what I already know his organization is aligned with foreign terrorist groups and they've been advised by those groups (they called for an October 7th style attack on US soil, it obviously didn't happen though) so my sympathy for him is understandably slim even while I acknowledge the administration needs a legitimate reason to deport him beyond 'he said some things'.
It's important to remember the first amendment is a restriction on the government after all. That doesn't mean that endorsing terrorists will have no repercussions when you lie about those affiliations at the border to gain entry though, if indeed that's what he did.
His ties to said organization are reason enough to toss him.
People keep forgetting he is a guest here.
"I think we can all agree they went fishing for something and almost certainly jumped the gun before they actually had a justification, "
There is an appearance of that. However it is easy for POTUS to make a call and have the person's entire social media scrubbed in short order, and anyone is their contact list, and anyone in their contact list (Three hops out). Relating it to terrorism opens the post 9/11 toolbox. So it's possible that they knew a lot more than they were saying at the time. We would not know.
Now, did they do that first? Who knows?
If they did know beforehand, they certainly didn't say a damn thing about their justifications until days later after they'd had time to sift through his entire life.
They wouldn't speak of it. You don't publicly speak of using these tools. Think along the lines of Stingray and how charges resulting from would be dropped if you challenged the source to prevent the use of the tool from being in the legal record. The data you get would be used to guide an investigation to give the appearance that the investigation discovered it. Then that can be used in court. I think the term is parallel investigation.
"The only room for doubt I can guess beyond that is when a group claims to support a terrorist group, trespasses, blocks students from going to class, litters and makes a mess, uses bullhorns, etc etc etc ... Suppose this group had been claiming to support the Mafia or Jeffrey Dahmer or the Unabomber, doing the exact same thing."
A protest group that wants to save the whales might trespass, block students, litter, etc. But those are incidental to their cause.
A terrorist organization is, pretty much by definition, planning on violence as a matter of course. Much like organized crime plans crimes. Pretty much every "meeting" is a "conspiracy to commit..." event.
""Laws against terrorism seem redundant, in that terrorism is just crime."
Terrorism is a special type of crime that opens the window for a level of surveillance that is only permitted for terrorism as per post 9/11 legislation.
Right: The argument here is that terrorism isn't just a crime against the person you killed or whose property you damaged. You are also essentially extorting other people- those who you are trying to terrorize.
While we COULD argue that you just should use Murder, Vandalism and Extortion rules, there is a reason why we don't just have a blanket "Murder" charge. The intent and circumstances line up into categories that should be treated differently under the law. A person killing a person accidentally, or in a fit of rage vs a person planning a cold murder, versus a person planning a spectacular murder meant to terrorize a community.
Sometimes it makes sense to have different laws to deal with these circumstances.
Important to ban cell phones in schools says Health and Human Services secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr….but it's because of "electromagnetic radiation." You were so close, RFK Jr.!
We want our teenagers' balls to remain fertile and unirradiated if we're to compete with the third world population.
This coupled with a moratorium on turning our boys into girls might bring us back from the brink of being Japan.
Also, Spring Break every month.
Yeah I think we're turning Japanese. I really think so.
Needz moar suicide forests.
"compete with the third world population."
I hate to tell you this: the 3rd world ain't reproducing either.
This week, a math professor at MIT told me that incoming students are, on average, noticeably worse at math than they used to be.
Time to dust off the old NO CHICKS ALLOWED sign and ship it off to MIT.
Not enough Asians?
I’m just spitballing here, but maybe the year and a half of not going to class, coupled with the decade long laser focus on woke indoctrination (DEI, anti-whiteness, 1/4 of them are now LGBTQ) had an impact and set them back a bit?
Colleges are also, universally, majority female.
I bet it's a coincidence.
Caltech has one they took down in the '70s...
"Universities" that offer remedial course are admitting students who are not ready for a "university".
My university wanted me to take remedial math when I started since I had a mostly public school education, but I put it off until my last year and took what I affectionately call 'shapes and colors' math for education majors from a community college and they considered that 'good enough' to graduate.
It also cost a hell of a lot less than their 'remedial math' course at my graduating university, so I guess I could do math after all.
Haa ha ha ha ha Trump defenders agree with Bernie Sanders the dumbfuck haaaaa ha ha ha ha!
Even a retarded stopped clock can be right twice a day. You are an excellent example of this.
Sarc agrees with Bernie Sanders nearly every day of the week so this is a novel stance from the idiot drunk.
But did you have Bernie saying something positive about Trump before sarc on your bingo card?
To be honest, yes. After I saw Biden wearing a MAGA hat I knew anything was possible before Sarckles.
Still drunk from the weekend?
Poor sarcbot.
I'm pretty sure Trump and defenders were saying it first so it would be Bernie Sanders agreeing with them.
But saying it that way wouldn't serve your Trump hate.
I’m old enough to have noticed that when the left is out of power, they send out their goons to cause chaos so they can campaign on “restoring normalcy.” It’s a complete scam.
It’s the last play left in their playbook:
1. Lose. Bigly.
2. Complain. A lot.
3. Launch their law drones for counter-loss lawfare.
4. Lose said lawfare suits. Bigly.
5. Send goons. Blow shit up. Riot. Cause chaos.
6. Campaign on “stopping the chaos” in the midterms.
7. ALWAYS promise more free shit.
'Give us what we want or else' isn't the greatest political campaign promise, but it's what they keep saying to us.
Amusingly, the 'or else' is exactly what they do when they're in power anyway so...not much incentive to listen to the Democrats...ever.
Steve Scalise nearly killed.
Two assassination attempts on Donald Trump's life.
Teslas getting firebombed as we speak.
But Mark Barabak wants to make sure you know it's Trump's fault that Eric Swalwell has to have a security guard.
I was told by no less a mind than shrike that there has only been one left wing murder in history.
I suspect the main reason Swalwell needs that security detail is to protect him from his Chinese pimp sponsors or DNC mob bosses if they decide that he's expendable, not Trump voters. And apparently if you get enough liquor in him, he even confesses to being a bigger pussy hound than Trump.
Yeah, the worst thing Trump supporters will do to Swallwell are fart, and fucking Chinese spy memes.
The guard is to stop Eric from eating any beans before a public appearance.
The Law Firms that Run DC
I see a lot of articles saying how President Trump is attacking law firms in Washington DC because he is vindictive. When in fact, it has nothing to do with being vindictive, and everything to do with the fact that they are acting like an extension of the Democratic Party.
This web shows how elite law firms in DC have become de facto political actors, coordinating with bureaucrats, Democratic campaigns, and activist groups to advance one side’s agenda while insulating allies from legal consequences.
1. Perkins Coie
Partisan Alignment: Strongly Democratic
Key Players: Marc Elias, Michael Sussmann
Involved In:
•Russiagate:
•Hired Fusion GPS on behalf of the Clinton campaign and DNC to create the Steele Dossier.
•Michael Sussmann was indicted for allegedly lying to the FBI about the source of Alfa Bank/Trump server claims (acquitted, but case exposed coordination between Clinton-linked lawyers and the intelligence community).
•Through Marc Elias, aggressively litigated to change election laws in battleground states pre-2020 (e.g., mail-in ballot rules, signature matching, ballot curing).
•Litigated against voter ID laws and redistricting efforts favoring GOP, using courts to alter rules under the guise of civil rights.
2. Elias Law Group
Partisan Alignment: 100% Democratic
Key Player: Marc Elias (founder, formerly at Perkins Cole)
Involved In:
•Election Lawfare:
•Filed hundreds of lawsuits between 2020–2024 aimed at changing ballot deadlines, preventing voter roll purges, and invalidating state-level election reforms.
•Sued states that passed voter integrity laws (Georgia, Texas, Arizona).
•Legal and strategic support for efforts to disqualify Trump from ballots under the 14th Amendment (Section 3).
3. WilmerHale
Partisan Alignment: Center-left establishment
Key Players: Robert Mueller, Jamie Gorelick
Involved In:
•Russiagate:
•Mueller was a WilmerHale partner before becoming special counsel.
•Several senior lawyers on Mueller’s team (Aaron Zebley, James Quarles) came from WilmerHale.
•Created a direct pipeline from a private DC firm to a politically charged investigation.
•WilmerHale defended companies and figures potentially affected by the Mueller investigation—raising questions about impartiality.
Insurrection Barbie
4. Latham & Watkins
Partisan Alignment: Progressive-leaning, deep resistance ties
Key Players: Kathryn Ruemmler (former Obama WH Counsel), multiple Obama-era appointees
Involved In:
•Lawfare Against Trump Policies:
•Litigated against Trump’s immigration, environmental, and regulatory rollbacks.
•Supported amicus briefs in support of January 6 prosecutions.
•Close ties to Biden DOJ officials (Ruemmler has known connections to current White House legal networks).
5. Covington & Burling
Partisan Alignment: Deep Obama/Biden ties
Key Players: Eric Holder, Lanny Breuer
Involved In:
•Russiagate/Deep State Entrenchment:
•Holder and Breuer returned to Covington after serving in the Obama DOJ.
•Firm has represented major tech and surveillance companies with ties to federal investigations.
•Defended figures in the intelligence community during investigations into FISA abuse and surveillance.
6. Debevoise & Plimpton
Partisan Alignment: Institutional left
Key Player: Mary Jo White (Obama SEC Chair), Andrew Ceresney
Involved In:
•Representing Hunter Biden in federal tax and firearms-related investigations.
•Helped negotiate controversial plea agreement that collapsed in 2023.
•Close ties to DOJ officials overseeing investigations of Hunter Biden. Scrutiny over sweetheart deals and unusual coordination.
Insurrection Barbie
7. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
Partisan Alignment: Progressive legal elite
Key Players: Jeh Johnson (Obama DHS), Loretta Lynch (Obama AG)
Involved In:
•Represented progressive groups in redistricting and voting rights lawsuits.
•No comparable representation for free speech or conservative plaintiffs, reinforcing political asymmetry.
•Consulted by Democratic-aligned NGOs on how to frame post-2020 election audit challenges as “threats to democracy.”
8. Jenner & Block
Partisan Alignment: J6-focused, anti-Trump
Key Players: Donald Verrilli (Obama SG), Ian Gershengorn
Involved In:
•January 6 Committee Staffing:
•Provided legal support and volunteers to the J6 Committee.
•Ties to lawfare efforts to charge Trump advisors and allies.
•Worked behind the scenes with groups like Lawfare Blog and Brookings to craft legal theories around “insurrection” and “disqualification.”
9. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
Partisan Alignment: Corporate Dem establishment
Key Players: Greg Craig (former Obama WH Counsel, indicted)
Involved In:
•Ukraine Lobbying Scandal:
•Paid millions by pro-Russian Ukrainian interests via Paul Manafort.
•Fined for failing to register under FARA. No major prosecutions of Skadden lawyers, despite harsh treatment of Manafort.
•Avoided accountability while similar conduct was used to hammer Trump affiliates.
People were wrong about the Deep State. It really is out on top.
You know about them, so it's not the deep state. -sarcjeff
I look forward to Lying Jeffy’s response…
“Norm Eisen accidentally told the truth that Judge Juan Merchan was part of his Bragg lawfare team. It didn’t take him long to figure out that he messed up.
I previously posted that Norm appeared to say that he was writing documents for the judge.
If true, that means Norm created the Bragg case, he worked with the witness Michael Cohen, and he worked with the judge.
Seems illegal to me.”
https://x.com/listen_2learn/status/1903877665339412894
Cancel all their clearances. Let them reapply stating the reason for application.
Bill Maher warned Democrats that if they don’t wake up, they’re going to “become the Whigs.” (New York Post, March 22, 2025)
Also:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-democrats-10-theories-driving-the-party-s-crisis/ar-AA1BrLMA
Talk to 20 Democrats and you'll find each one has a different theory of why they lost the 2024 election and sent the party into a spiral.
The party was cohesive in 2017 under a resistance banner. That's no longer the case — and the finger-pointing goes in all directions.
Why it matters: It's hard to win if you don't know why you lost.
Zoom in: Here are 10 theories, based on conversations with dozens of top Democrats, on what went wrong and what needs to change.
1. It's all Joe Biden's fault. For president, the party ran a deteriorating 81-year-old incumbent who had to drop out roughly 100 days before the election.
With such unprecedented headwinds, the party actually did OK after Biden left the race: Kamala Harris boosted party members' enthusiasm and avoided a wipeout. She lost the Electoral College by just 230,000 votes. Dems won Senate seats in four states that Trump won (Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, and Arizona).
2. It's all Kamala Harris' fault. She was a bad candidate in 2019 and many Democrats didn't see her as their strongest possible choice in 2024. Some believe the party should have had a mini-primary before its August convention — or taken its chances with Biden.
Even Harris' running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, recently said he believes their campaign was too cautious.
3. Podcasts and social media. Harris and other Democrats should have gone on Joe Rogan's show, fully embraced TikTok, and met voters where they were.
The party's policies were right, many Democrats say — but the voters didn't know it.
4. "Too woke." Democrats struggled to defend their support for marginalized communities — transgender people, those who benefit from diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs, and others.
Republicans spent tens of millions on ads blasting Democrats as having gone too far left on such social issues. Democrats failed to effectively justify their positions and counter-program the attacks.
Some Democrats, including potential 2028 presidential contenders Rahm Emanuel and California Gov. Gavin Newsom, argue that the party needs to moderate or focus less on such issues.
Another possible 2028 candidate, former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, quietly removed his pronouns from his X profile — a reflection of the calculus some Democrats are making post-2024.
5. Elitist words. The party has become the party of the college-educated and for the college-educated — and its members talk like it in ways the working class often finds condescending or alienating.
6. Elitist policies. It's not just the way the party talks — it's the way it governs. The working class has felt left behind by the Democratic Party as it's embraced free trade and other center-left technocratic policies. Those voters have been drifting to the GOP for years. Now that's reached a crisis point.
7. Testosterone. Many men, especially young men, feel Democrats don't have an agenda for them and don't seem to care about their problems. So they've turned toward MAGA.
8. Inflation, inflation, inflation. Incumbents throughout the Western world have lost as voters vent about inflation. Any incumbent party would have had trouble holding onto the White House.
9. The border. Democrats mishandled the border under Biden and abandoned the tough-on-immigration policies the party had under Presidents Clinton and Obama, playing right into Trump's signature issue.
Many Democrats assumed that Latino voters would be turned off by Trump's calls for mass deportations. Most Latinos stuck with Harris — but Trump set a new record for Latino support for a Republican, according to exit polls.
10. Trump is one-of-a-kind. To explain Trump's victory in 2016, Democrats blamed Russia, social media, fake news, Bernie Sanders, James Comey, Anthony Weiner and media coverage of Hillary Clinton's email server.
Democrats didn't grapple with the most obvious explanation: Many voters liked Trump and related to what he said.
All ten are true and they are ranked pretty much in order with 1-3 causing the most harm.
But voters have short memories. In 2004 and 2016 the GOP had full control of the Senate, House and Presidency only to get totally tossed out of power within four years.
"Throw the Bums Out" is the only constant in American politics. Donnie will lose big in the next two elections.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
"" Donnie will lose big in the next two elections.""
I'm generally a believer that the incumbent's party will lose in midterms. But that might be changing. The Rs did not do as well as I expected in the Biden midterm elections. I attributed this to the abortion issue. So particularly hot issues may give a different result. Illegal immigration is a hot issue. Excessive government spending may be a hot issue in midterm. If so, people may not want to elect the team that enables it the most.
The only real reasons they lost are racism and sexism and we should encourage this thinking.
Old case against kahil
He's a rag head terrorist that hates my country. Instead of deportation he should be executed
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/03/21/chris-cuomo-delivers-the-perfect-response-to-this-viewers-criticism-of-his-trump-coverage-n2654206
I’m not the biggest fan of Chris Cuomo, but ever since he left CNN, the man has become one of the more sensible news hosts in the Trump era. Cuomo has a bone to pick with Donald Trump, who called him an enemy of the state. He said he had to move because of that swipe. But when a viewer accused him of ‘sane-washing’ Trump, he blew his stack and delivered a sensible commentary. It's how the liberal media used to act and should act when covering someone with whom they disagree intensely.
"At what point are you going to realize that people know who Trump is and what he is and what he has done. They're not electing him to be their daddy, or to date their mom, or to take care of their kid, or to be in business with them. They're picking him to be a disruptor of a system that they are more concerned about than any of his personal foibles. Don't you get it?"
"At what point are you going to realize that people know who Trump is and what he is and what he has done. They're not electing him to be their daddy, or to date their mom, or to take care of their kid, or to be in business with them. They're picking him to be a disruptor of a system that they are more concerned about than any of his personal foibles. Don't you get it?"
And despite all his more than obvious flaws and risks, people preferred Trump over Democrats. Suck on that.
When Trump defeated Hillary Clinton I once wrote:
The rookie Trump strategically and tactically outplayed the veteran--her, the master politician and "most qualified person to ever run for the office"??!
And he is perhaps the most vilified person (and not without cause) ever to run for the office and before the election Mr. Obama had campaigned more for Democrat Hillary Clinton than any modern sitting president had for his party’s nominee.
And she still couldn't muster the win?
That's why we desperately need democracy with guardrails.
Like in Romania - right?
*smh*
These guys tend to be a lot more honest about their views when they aren't having their leashes yanked by corporate media boards. It's a big reason Greenwald and Taibbi had to go over to Substack.
But when a viewer accused him of ‘sane-washing’ Trump,
I've noticed various commenters on the cuckservative right echoing this same phrase over the last year or so. It shows these idiots really do take everything the left says at face value.
Its a phrase I am pretty sure Bill Maher would approve of.. .and yet he is getting an audience with the Republican Pope himself!
"They're picking him to be a disruptor of a system that they are more concerned about than any of his personal foibles. Don't you get it?"
That is almost the exact conversation I had with a couple people about my reasons for voting Trump (not that it mattered where I live). I felt that if the status quo remained unchanged, we'd end up in a civil war or/and economic collapse within 4 years. Of the two, only one candidate was offering any counter vision to the status quo. I still don't know if it will work, but at least it gives us a chance at a way out.
Maybe if the democrats had allowed any of their more populist voices to rise to prominence and run in the past 8 years instead of shutting them down things would have played out differently.
He gets my stamp of approval because I believe I'd like him if I met him in person and I do approve of most of his policies. Full stop. No further *I cant stand x, y z...he's bad on a, b c* mea culpas to make sure people thing I'm sane.
To all those who think its necessary to justify your support because "Orange man bad" then I say - "go to hell". I like who I like and approve those things I approve of.
I agree: The specifics of what Khalil did to "support" Hamas—beyond speech—really matter. The government doesn't seem to have a very good case here.,
You're still altering the question to justify the answer you want. Switch Hamas for terrorism. Khalil joined an organization whose mission is to "eradicate Western Civilization" and expressly supports terrorism to achieve this. Defending Khalil on this basis is like defending an accused racist without mentioning he joined and became a leader in the KKK.
And no criminal proceedings are required for his status to be revoked.
"What right-wing people in this country would love is an open-border policy," Sanders continued. "Bring in all kinds of people, work for $2 or $3 an hour, that would be great for them.
This older statement by Bernie is a great example of how much the political realignment has moved in the last decade. An open borders, "let as many in as possible" policy was as much a feature of the center-right over the last generation as it was of Soros's odious "Open Society" activism, as the former were manically fixated on this idea that the US labor force required endless influxes of blue-collar peon service class workers so that the former immigrants and their kids could migrate over to the white collar sector. The Jonah Goldberg right has always promoted this as a kind of population ponzi scheme, using American patriotism and appeals to World War II Holocaust guilt as the current US creation myth to justify it.
Yeah. Everyone tries to stick NAFTA on Bill Clinton, but I recall George Bush the Elder pushing that shit. I knew something was fundamentally weird for a supposed conservative to champion that.
Yeah, Clinton just happened to be in office when it passed, and while he supported it, it was very much a Uniparty policy. Ross Perot made opposition to it one of the centerpieces of his campaign.
Perot is a weird little goblin, but he was still the better choice at the time.
But the blinders hadn't been removed from the public eye until the advent of Trump. That was one of his greatest and hopefully long lasting accomplishments.
Spiked had some COVID retrospectives over the weekend:
https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/03/23/how-scientists-misled-the-world-about-covids-origins/
https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/03/23/take-it-from-a-sage-adviser-lockdown-was-a-disaster/
https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/03/23/take-it-from-a-sage-adviser-lockdown-was-a-disaster/
https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/03/23/lockdown-a-reckoning/
It’s been five years, and I’m still pissed off and radicalized. And the likes of Jeffy, Sarc, and J(ew)free supported that shit.
all my "five years ago today" pics recently have been of bandits
England wants to give lighter prison sentences to black and Muslims. Because "overrepresentation of non-white offenders in our prisons reflects racial prejudice in the justice system".
Maybe they can take the Jeff tack of being really sorry for what they did and get released? This is already basically excusing them because "their culture" doesn't say things like "murder is bad" and "thou shalt not gang-rape 16-year-old girls".
https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/03/12/the-sentencing-row-reveals-the-woke-turn-of-the-judiciary/
The Sentencing Council for England and Wales has put equality before the law in serious doubt. Last week, it published new sentencing guidelines appearing to favour offenders from ethnic-minority backgrounds. The guidance requires judges to consider a pre-sentence report (PSR) before passing a sentence on an offender from an ‘ethnic-minority, cultural-minority, and / or faith-minority community’. This would make these offenders less likely to receive a custodial sentence.
The Uk is becoming an Islamic Caliphate.
Becoming? Aren’t London and Birmingham already there?
Guys like Russel T Davies don't seem to understand that their shilling for 'ethnic minorities' is going to get them thrown off a roof, but then guys like him are rich enough to have 24/7 armed security I suppose.
His boy toys probably don't though.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/why-is-a-labour-mp-calling-for-a-blasphemy-law/
Today at Prime Minister’s Questions, the Labour MP Tahir Ali asked: ‘Will the Prime Minister commit to introducing measures to prohibit the desecration of all religious texts and the prophets of the Abrahamic religions?’
Does Mr Ali think this is the most important issue currently facing the UK? Or, even more disturbingly, is this something that his constituents are calling for?
The fact that we have an MP from the governing party calling for blasphemy laws to be reinstated is part of a terrifying development in politics. It comes alongside a rise in sectarian voting, which has seen minority groups pitted against each other and a splintering of modern society.
Why, for example, did Mr Ali choose only to cite the Abrahamic religions? Would I still be free to say awful things about Ganesh or Vishnu in Mr Ali’s dream society as long as I didn’t criticise the Quran? If I were a British Hindu listening, I would start to feel increasingly concerned about Ali’s intentions.
Perhaps most concerning of all was the Prime Minister’s response to Ali’s question. Keir Starmer uttered a bland, robotic reply that, ‘Desecration is awful, and we are committed to tackling all forms of hatred and division, including Islamophobia.’
There's that cultural enrichment they keep touting.
Invite in the 3rd world, become the 3rd world.
>"What right-wing people in this country would love is an open-border policy," Sanders continued. "Bring in all kinds of people, work for $2 or $3 an hour
What is hilarious is that this is the actual *left wing* position on open borders.
Gotta have a permanent underclass to pick your strawberries.
when I was fifteen, fifteen year-olds picked strawberries it was an interesting way to discover a strawberry allergy lol
The left doesn't give a shit about immigrant peon labor in that regard, it's just the cudgel they used against the right for decades because it appealed to the Rockefeller/Bush Republicans "cheap shit" obsession, and their adjoining pretense that every immigrant was an entrepreneur or doctor that "just needed an opportunity."
The left sees immigrants as their revolutionary vanguard, which is why they've been an open borders party since Hart-Cellar was passed.
The justifications are the same between Democrats and Republicans on open borders. There is no daylight between them other than the rhetoric they use to justify it.
I don't actually see much that is left wing about that position. It's a position of convenience for Democrats.
>>A weird consequence of an expected Trump travel ban: Cuban and Venezuelan pro baseball players (P-1 visa holders) might no longer be allowed to exit/enter our borders.
negotiation ploy to rid MLB of the despicable ghost-runner on 2d in extras.
>>"If his 'crime' is just the expression of support for a terrorist organization, then this pageant is grotesque.
a grotesque pageant has been on for sure.
>>Most reasonable people probably agree that phone use in school is bad
then why does it require addressing by HHS?
Reasonable people have little say in what goes on in schools.
shame they don't get together and vote or something
Because parenting is hard; easier to just have government do the parenting for you?
>>Bloomberg has an awesome tracker tool
guess your time in Panama failed to lead to reflection on biased sources
If people are getting stupider it might be time to put the lead back in the paint and the gasoline.
What annoys me is they are painting that as we've moved beyond peak intelligence, when in reality it's a failure of education writ large not some change in fundamental human intelligence.
Projection. Virtually everything the left denounces is simply an admission of things they are currently doing but that they don't want the other side to do.
-----------------
"Every accusation from a Democrat is a confession," journalist Batya Ungar-Sargon says
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/every-accusation-from-a-democrat-is-a-confession-journalist-says/vi-AA1Bqhp9
What happened to that facebook blogger Reason kept making articles about? Khalil really sucked the air out of the room for her.
So how are everybodies' brackets looking? My picks for Thursday were god-awful. I missed basically everything-both 5v12 games, both 6v11 games, both 7v10 games, and both 8v9 games. However, I rebounded by picking every single winner from the 8 games played yesterday. My Final Four is still intact, for now.
still alive in my suicide pool. Clemson killed half the field.
Yeah, I botched that Clemson game too. I really should have banked more on just how weak the ACC was this year.
big12 too zzzzzzzzzzzz
The various attempts to stick them in dresses and cut off their testicles might be a factor here.
GEN Z IS GOING RED — AND DEMOCRATS CAN’T BELIEVE IT
David Shor is stunned: Gen Z, once hailed as the future of the progressive movement, is now leaning conservative.
Trump’s support among 18-29 year olds just hit 52.7%. Young men are backing him by huge margins.
Ezra Klein put it bluntly:
“Democrats are getting destroyed now among young voters.”
Turns out Gen Z isn’t buying the identity politics and censorship.
They want freedom, fairness, and a future — and they’re finding it on the right.
""Turns out Gen Z isn’t buying the identity politics and censorship.""
I've been saying for years that America is not buy what the left is selling.
Chemjeff's America really set a fascist precedent. It’s not a coincidence that every country that has a Populist Leader winning in the polls also has a good chance of seeing them being arrested and sent to prison or banned from politics for made up crimes.
Prosecutors seek five-year ban from public office for French opposition leader Marine Le Pen.
Le Pen is not mightier than the sword.
Thats the lesson of all European nations writ large.
Remember, Buttplug and Sarckles say the Republicans are the violent ones somehow.
Democrat Rep. Jasmine Crockett THREATENS Sen. Ted Cruz:
“I think that you punch… it’s Ted Cruz. I mean like this dude has to be knocked over the head, like, hard. Right. Like there is no niceties with him. Like at all. You go clean off on him."
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/miacathell/2025/03/24/erin-white-tesla-attack-chicago-n2654073
A "transgender"-identifying activist was charged with vandalizing a newly constructed Tesla service center near Chicago following the firebombings of two other Tesla sites allegedly by "trans" suspects.
Erin Go Bro.
Same article, different perp...
Adam Matthew Lansky, 41, who uses the "trans" alias "Allison Tesla," was arrested over the Inauguration Day firebombing and February 19 shooting of a Tesla showroom in Salem, Oregon.
He has since been charged by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) with illegally possessing an unregistered destructive device. Lansky was apprehended after throwing approximately eight Molotov cocktails at the Tesla locale, according to the Trump DOJ.
https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2025/03/24/new-domestic-terror-plot-foiled-in-austin-n3801109
This happened at 8:04 local time today. Oddly enough, the Dallas Morning News has yet to report on the act of domestic terrorism even at 1:45 in the afternoon. They do, however, have a snarky editorial cartoon poking fun at the rising acts of terror against Tesla and car owners over Elon Musk's participation in the US DOGE Service and elimination of swaths of federal spending.
Fox News has picked up the story, however:
Incendiary devices were discovered at a Tesla dealership in Austin, Texas, on Monday morning, authorities said, the latest in widespread acts of violence targeting the electric carmaker.
The bomb squad investigated and removed the devices without incident after they were discovered at the dealership along U.S. Highway 183, the Austin Police Department said.
There's a new Dan Carlin Common Sense out for the 1st time in 3 years.
I haven't listened to the whole thing yet, but judging from the 1st half, my fellow TDS sufferers will love it, but Trump cultists will hate it.
For everyone else...no wait...everyone fits in one of those 2 categories.
https://www.dancarlin.com/product/common-sense-324-whats-good-for-the-goose/
Yes I do hate it. Maybe because I haven't got to the common sense part yet and am still stuck in the conventional wisdom and received opinion parts.
Yeah, I finished it and found it to be hyperbolic even for this TDS sufferer. Too bad, I really liked Common Sense back in the day.
"...my fellow TDS sufferers will love it, but Trump cultists..."
Those with TDS are Trump cultists.
[I get emails from several leftist organizations...]
Public Citizen (https://www.citizen.org/) email today flat out lies.
Claims:
Some pesky facts about Social Security:
Currently, around 70 million Americans depend on Social Security every month.
At the risk of stating the obvious, they have earned those benefits. Social Security is not a government handout. (Unlike the numerous tax breaks and subsidies that billionaires like Howard Lutnick and giant corporations get courtesy of American taxpayers.)
People pay into the system throughout their working lives, then get money back once they reach a certain age.
Both of those characterizations are 100% false, and in this case seems specifically designed as propaganda to convince people that this is actually how SS works...that "their money" is in an account somewhere waiting for them to have it sent back to them.
"But even if that is true, the Justice Department has shown its true motivation"
Can you get any more childish? "Welcome to 'What's My Motivation?' The show where the points don't matter and only your motivation counts!" It's the "All Evil Trump Hour" and there is no shade of gray allowed here. While I agree that deciding what you want to do first and then scouring the books for plausible excuses is a reprehensible mode for government officials, putting this in the context of an escalating culture war shortly after the other side regained central power leaves a lot of room for subtlety.