Rand Paul Seeks Information on U.K. Requests for Americans' Private Data
Last month, the U.K. reportedly demanded access to any Apple user's data anywhere in the world. Paul wants to know if any other companies have received similar orders recently.

Last month, the United Kingdom Home Secretary reportedly demanded access to user data of any Apple customer on the planet. Apple chose to degrade U.K. users' data protection instead of complying with the order. In a letter to the U.S. attorney general this week, Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) expressed concern about the order and requested information on any other recent orders.
"Recent reports suggest that authorities in the United Kingdom (UK) have issued an order to a U.S. company requiring access to all end-to-end encrypted materials of UK users," wrote Paul, who chairs the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi. "This action raises significant questions about the integrity of U.S. user data in the context of the Cloud Act and UK statutes."
The Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data (CLOUD) Act, passed in 2018 as part of a 2,000-plus page omnibus spending bill, requires tech companies to provide information about customers to the government when asked, even if that information is stored outside the United States. The Department of Justice later entered into a data sharing agreement with the U.K. under the CLOUD Act.
When the bill came up for a vote, Paul tweeted an article in which American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) legislative counsel Neema Singh Guliani wrote that "Congress should reject the CLOUD Act because it fails to protect human rights or Americans' privacy…gives up their constitutional role, and gives far too much power to the attorney general, the secretary of state, the president and foreign governments."
In his letter to Bondi, Paul relayed that the U.K.'s demand was "the latest concerning attempt by law enforcement entities to obtaining 'backdoor' access to private user context under the pretext of national security."
To that end, he asked for unredacted copies of any requests from the U.K. government for information about U.S.-based companies—known as a "technical capability notice"—received since August 2024. Paul also asked for "records related to any confidentiality agreements or nondisclosure requirements applicable to a U.S. company as it relates to actions authorized pursuant to the US–UK Cloud Act Agreement."
Under the U.K.'s Investigatory Powers Act—nicknamed the Snooper's Charter—Britain can request information about a company's users and forbid the company from disclosing the order's existence.
The Investigatory Powers Tribunal hears complaints about U.K. government surveillance; in a letter last week, five U.S. lawmakers, led by Sen. Ron Wyden (D–Ore.), asked the tribunal to "remove the cloak of secrecy related to notices given to American technology companies by the United Kingdom."
In fact, the U.K.'s actions are already chilling American speech. "Apple has informed Congress that had it received a technical capabilities notice, it would be barred by U.K. law from telling Congress whether or not it received such a notice from the U.K., as the press has reported," the letter noted. "Google also recently told Senator Wyden's office that, if it had received a technical capabilities notice, it would be prohibited from disclosing that fact."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Hey, as long as my own government isn’t spying on me, what’s the problem?
/sarc
Jeff calls that government free speech.
Sponsor: Rep. Collins, Doug [R-GA-9]
Fuck Doug Collins.
If I had something to hide from the UK or US government or China for that matter, I would certainly NOT trust Apple or Google or Facebook to protect my confidential information. On a more general note, no our government and Apple should not be allowed to access or reveal my personal information without a warrant specifying the suspected crime and the evidence specifically being sought in that investigation.
"U.K. Requests for Americans' Private Data"
Molon labe
They did.
And lost.
Just ban all cell phones, and all social media.
Simple.
I mean. a few gun control laws and violence ended completely, right?
What is good enough for the second is good enough for the first.
If the ATF is constitutional certainly the Thought Police or Speech Police is as well. Requiring a federal background check before being allowed to write anything down seems totally ok. Writing is dangerous, can't have just anyone doing it.
A 30 day waiting period, General; don't forget a 30 day waiting period.
Of course. Don't forget it should also be illegal to make your own paper at home. Paper must be properly stamped with trackable serial numbers.
Sales of pens, whether new or used, shall be reported to the DHS for inclusion in a new database, and all pencils and pens manufactured following this notice shall be implanted with trackable microchips.
Sales of ink are to be subject to background checks on those who wish to buy.
Possession of feathers large enough to be shaved into quills is strictly forbidden. Kids and neighbors: if you see something, say something!
All data to be shared at whim with other governments, favored non-profits, and select media (this last not for attribution, of course).
High capacity mechanical pencils that hold more than one shaft of graphite are banned. Loading one shaft at a time is plenty.
Pencils longer than 5" or shorter than 4" shall also be banned. Possession of a sawed off pencil is extra bad.
Assault pencils with the outside colored black, those are clearly more dangerous and banned.
Colored pencils, can't have those. You might get creative or something and try using them for art.
Don't even get started on concealed pencil carry.
As long as you don't do any of 1000 super arbitrary things - your rights are totally not infringed.
Real ID has already given the UK all of my personal data including biometric data for face recognition. I guess it is ok if government does it?
Maybe you shouldn't visit fascist countries?
Well shit, that doesn’t leave much, does it?
Under the U.K.'s Investigatory Powers Act—nicknamed the Snooper's Charter—Britain can request information about a company's users and forbid the company from disclosing the order's existence.
What does the UK do if a company discloses the order's existence? On a related note, F the UK.
Thank you again Rand Paul! This totally unacceptable, and if is acceptable in the U.K., we need to figure out how to protect the US citizens from foreign governments accessing anything they request.
Keep in mind, the EU and the nations within went down the shitter a long time ago.
Thank you Rand Paul and keep up the good work.
F*** Kweer Stammer and f*** the U.K. Trump should shut down every U.S. military base in the U.K. and let them stew in it.
WE don't need them and we don't need NATO...or the U.N.
I'm just saying, I've got a solution to this. I know you guys don't like it, but it is a solution.
Pew pew pew.
No worries. Reason's Anti-Tariff lobbying will make sure all foreign government invasion of privacy will be carried out with a ZERO-tax penalty.