How Many Americans Have Died of COVID-19?
Adding up COVID-19's toll since Donald Trump declared a national emergency five years ago.

This week marks five years since March 13, 2020, the day President Donald Trump declared a national state of emergency over the novel coronavirus outbreak. By that date, only 57 Americans had died of COVID-19 and 1,645 had been diagnosed with the virus. Three days later, the White House issued the President's Coronavirus Guidelines for America. Among other things, the guidelines advised Americans to avoid bars, restaurants, shopping trips, and social visits. They also recommended that governors in states with evidence of community transmission should close schools, bars, restaurants, food courts, gyms, and other indoor and outdoor venues. By then, the death toll had risen to 102.
Sticking to peer-reviewed science and setting aside the political question of what the government should do with this information, what do we know now about how deadly the pandemic was? On Monday and yesterday, we looked at what researchers have discovered over the past five years about the efficacy of facial masking for protection against COVID-19 and the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin for treating coronavirus infections. Next, we'll discuss what researchers have determined about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.
Today, we look at estimates of how many Americans have died of COVID-19. Some initial projections were frightening. On March 16, 2020, a team of epidemiological modelers associated with the Imperial College London published an alarming study calculating that 2.2 million Americans would die of COVID-19 if measures to stem the spread of the virus were not taken soon. A year later, a retrospective article in The Lancet: Microbe noted that "this information became foundational in decisions to implement physical distancing and adherence to other public health measures because it established the upper boundary for any worst-case scenarios." On March 18, 2020, I asked: Are we battling an unprecedented pandemic or panicking at a computer-generated mirage?
Others expressed more sanguine views. For example, Elon Musk bet $1 million with his (former) friend neuroscientist Sam Harris in March 2020 that there wouldn't be as many 35,000 cases (never mind deaths) of COVID-19 in the United States. In an interview with Reason, New York University law professor Richard Epstein stood by his March 16, 2020, article (since removed) from the Hoover Institution, in which he asserted the total number of deaths from COVID-19 globally would top out under 50,000 and that the United States we would see "about 500 deaths at the end."
In an effort to gauge the pandemic's toll, various researchers early on tried to nail down the infection fatality rate for the illness—that is, the percentage of infected individuals expected to die. At the beginning of the pandemic, no one knew crucial information, such as how fast the virus could spread, what percentage of infected people would remain asymptomatic, and whether they could transmit the virus to more vulnerable individuals. Initial infection fatality rates ranged widely.
For example, an April 11, 2020, study headed by Stanford physician Jay Bhattacharya (now a nominee for director of the National Institutes of Health) calculated an infection fatality rate of 0.12–0.2 percent. This suggested that COVID-19 was not much more deadly than seasonal flu. This contrasts with the Lancet study, which projected a 0.9 percent infection fatality rate from COVID-19 infections. These figures compare with the estimated U.S. infection fatality rate of 0.64 percent for the 1918 influenza pandemic.
Calculating deaths from epidemics takes years. More than 100 years later, estimates for the number of deaths stemming from the 1918 influenza pandemic globally still range from 17 to 100 million. So, keep in mind that COVID-19 death counts will still be contested for years to come.
In addition to tracking deaths attributed to COVID-19, researchers aim to account for those missed by formal diagnoses by calculating excess deaths. Excess deaths are typically defined as the number of deaths during a particular period above the usual, expected number of deaths under normal conditions.
A February 2024 article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences calculated excess deaths between March 2020 and August 2022, concluding that around 1.2 million Americans had died of COVID-19. A January 2025 analysis in the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Statistics in Society Series A calculated excess pandemic mortality in the United States for 2020 and 2021 at 920,731. Interestingly, Stanford biostatistician John Ioannidis, a skeptic of worst-case COVID-19 pandemic claims, and his colleagues calculated in a December 2023 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences article that the U.S. suffered 1,220,295 excess deaths between 2020 and 2023. Notably, they also calculated that the U.S. actually experienced 3,456 fewer than expected deaths of Americans aged 14 and under during that period. Considering that all of these calculations use data from 2023 or earlier, they suggest that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's current count of 1,225,281 American deaths from COVID-19 and related causes is somewhat conservative.
As a side note, several practitioners of the dismal science calculate in their March 2025 National Bureau of Economic Research study that the approximately 1.4 million excess deaths among Americans aged 25 and older between 2020 and 2023 have reduced the future outlays of Social Security by about $156 billion.
What have researchers learned about the infection fatality rate for COVID-19? The picture remains hazy. A rough calculation, assuming that 80 percent of Americans have had a bout of COVID-19, suggests an infection fatality rate of 0.45 percent. A June 2024 study in Infectious Disease Modelling calculated the median pre-vaccination rate for the U.S. at 0.214 percent. This is close to the rate reported by Bhattacharya and his colleagues back in 2020.
The upshot: Since Trump's COVID-19 national emergency declaration, COVID-19 has either been the underlying cause of or contributed to the deaths of some 1.3 million Americans.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Garbage in; garbage out. As has been pointed out here in the comments hundreds of times, the stats on COVID "deaths" fail to distinguish between deaths from COVID, deaths with COVID, deaths presumed to be for or with COVID without testing, and deaths that had nothing to do with COVID because reporting COVID deaths was lucrative for hospitals. Nor do they sort out deaths of very old, very sick people who would have died very soon anyway but were given a COVID diagnoses before they croaked, adding them to the "excess deaths". The result is that we will never know how many people were actually killed by COVID. What we do know is that the mortality was in line with that of other common respiratory viruses, and that virtually all mortality was among the very old and very ill.
deaths was lucrative for hospitals.
Remember how we went through the three-phase process with this one?
1. It wasn't true.
2. It was true, but not as bad as you say.
3. It's true, and was vital for our national fight against the deadly virus.
Excess deaths are not calculated by assigning a cause of death and then adding it to a tally. Excess deaths are based on the number of deaths that were statistically expected. So if someone kicks off from COVID two seconds before they would have died of natural causes, that doesn't change the number of excess deaths. Nobody says when someone dies, "hey, was this an excess death or a regular one?" It's just the actuarial number of deaths predicted for a time period subtracted from the number of people who actually died. Someone who died of COVID, someone who died of a heart attack,and someone who died when they tried to jump over the local Denny's on their motorcycle are all counted the same.
I should probably read this article more thoroughly before commenting but in his desperation to be relevant Ron seems determined to conflate excess deaths with deaths from Covid infection. This of course ignores deaths from the vaccines, well documented in Europe, Canada and elsewhere, deaths from delayed medical care during the lockdowns, deaths from suicide because of authoritarian repression, bankruptcy of small business owners driven to desperation and about a million other reasons resulting from Ron's beloved government assaults on liberty. Anybody paying attention knew from the beginning of this scam how this flu would play out because we actually had a real world example on a Princess Cruise liner. We knew the infection rate. We knew the vulnerable population. We knew the fatality rate. Ron chose to ignore actual evidence and appealed to corrupt authority which left him in a corner with nothing left except to screech "more testing" while his house of cards collapsed around him. Now he seeks to redeem himself by writing retrospectives ignoring his own culpability by pretending some new found knowledge. Just fuck off Ron. We know where you've been. You are just like Fauci and Brix. Beyond redemption.
That's the example I've been pointing to since the beginning. The actual statistics followed in line with conclusions a person could reasonably derive from that one early case study. The "best and brightest" are either retarded or expect us to be with what is reported from them.
Yeah. That was back when the Chinese were posting fake videos of people dropping dead on the street when an actual controlled study dropped into our collective laps by pure accident. Serendipitous to say the least. But the experts had a different agenda. Covid was never a mystery. Just lies, damn lies and statistics.
""You are just like Fauci and Brix. Beyond redemption.""
But did he get a pardon?
Ron's not worthy of pardon. Only derision.
Sounds as if some didn't read thoroughly. "Excess deaths" were used to adjust the numbers, for sure. But rightly so. Remember that 9/11 didn't even cause the "excess death" count for NYC alone to change enough to be statistically significant.
Know anyone who died from COVID? I knew five. Yep, four out of that five were elderly.
But so am I.
The new NIH director is of the same mind as me: allow herd immunity for most, protect those at risk. Because the "lockdown" wasn't; the number of carveouts grew daily, until it was just demoralizing detention.
Six or eight weeks of "hard" lockdown, with no travel, and things would have ended quickly. But as we are humans, that could not have happened, so we dragged it out for a few years.
That's not what I said.
The stats should also look at "projected years of life lost." A million people dying at an average age of 40 is a lot different from a million people dying at an average age of 75.
And many of the "excess deaths" could be from other causes -- people with advanced medical conditions (heart disease, cancer, diabetes, etc.) avoiding hospitals and medical care out of fear of COVID.
The lower mortality rate among young people could be from avoiding social interactions where they may have contracted other diseases more deadly to young people (compared to COVID-19).
Another estimate said people gained an average of 20 pounds while working from home or in lockdown for a year. The health impact in years of lost life from that would be significant in its own right, not to mention the loss of exercise and the mental well being from normal human social interactions.
The estimated "excess deaths" are from all causes, including COVID-19 and misguided lockdown policies.
“With”
Even murder-suicides.
From Sky News:
The Grand County Colorado coroner is disputing the number of COVID-19 deaths the state is reporting for the county.
Brenda Bock told county commissioners on Tuesday that the state is reporting two additional COVID-19 deaths in Grand, which she believes should not be included.
The coroner maintains that only one person in the county has died from COVID-19, while two more people have died with it, for a total of three COVID-related deaths in the county. However, the state is reporting five for Grand.
In disputing the numbers, Bock explained that a couple who died of gunshot wounds late last month IN A MURDER-SUICIDE SHOOTING have been included in the state’s numbers. The state told Bock those deaths are included in the count because the two tested positive for COVID-19 within 30 days before their death.
And motorcycle accidents although Snopes says this was ultimately corrected.
-----------
A person who died in a motorcycle accident was added to Florida’s COVID-19 death count, according to a state health official.
FOX 35 News found this out after asking Orange County Health Officer Dr. Raul Pino whether two coronavirus victims who were in their 20s had any underlying conditions. One of his answers surprised us.
“The first one didn’t have any. He died in a motorcycle accident,” Pino said.
Dr. Pino was asked if the man’s data was removed.
“I don’t think so. I have to double-check,” Pino said. “We were arguing, discussing, or trying to argue with the state. Not because of the numbers -- it’s 100…it doesn’t make any difference if it's 99 -- but the fact that the individual didn’t die from COVID-19…died in the crash. But you could actually argue that it could have been the COVID-19 that caused him to crash. I don’t know the conclusion of that one.”
Vernon in, Vernon out.
Another barf-worthy diatribe from a Reasonoid pinhead of small brain.
Cue fever pitched microcephalic chorus.
that virtually all mortality was among the very old and very ill.
Shout out to Lovecon, he posted the John Hopkins data daily showing this.
>>Calculating deaths from epidemics takes years.
so why bother? also can I safely call March "Chick and Mick Month" if I'm of Irish descent?
So WHERE do I buy, beg, borrow, or steal a "Mick-Chick and a Brick on a Stick, to Lick", anyway? (Especially if the Mick-Chick is a fiery red-headed Ginger and is built like a brick shit-house!)
Inquiring minds want to KNOW, ya know!
mme. dillinger looks Irish but her red is Russian ... I let it slide lol
NO ONE has EVER died of COVID! It was all just in our heads! Collective hysteria brought on by leftist ag-shitators and their scary "nocebos"; see "bad placebo" or ...
(noh-SEE-boh) A harmless substance or treatment that may cause harmful side effects or worsening of symptoms because the patient thinks or believes they may occur or expects them to occur.
Nocebos are best fended off by placebos, such ass witch doctors and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeopathy homeopathy... I do SNOT recommend voting for Trump, Trumpaloos, or tariff-trade wars!!!
you might like Ellen Langer
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0593497945/reasonmagazinea-20/
Thanks! I have wanted to get my 20-year-old body back for many years now. I wonder if this book could help me with that?
try the Huberman podcast she was a guest like 1-2 months ago it was fascinating
Donnie said it was just like the normal flu and would be gone by Easter 2020.
So deaths were zero.
But yet he declared that emergency! It's both things at once! The national emergency that he didn't care about is 100% all on Him!
Biden and Harris made clear at a primary debate that they wouldn't trust the vaccine.
So they were MAGA?
No.
And I agreed. But facts changed or something.
How many chickens died from the bird flu? 200 million?
Nobody knows, because they're being slaughtered by the millions just on suspicion.
Related:
Germany's foreign intelligence service in 2020 put at 80%-90% the likelihood that the coronavirus behind the COVID-19 pandemic was accidentally released from China's Wuhan Institute of Virology, two German newspapers reported on Wednesday.
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/german-spy-agency-concluded-covid-virus-likely-leaked-lab-papers-say-2025-03-12/
This isn't even up for debate any more. Unless someone can prove it didn't come from a lab, it came from a lab... a lab funded by Trump lackey, Anthony Fauci.
That is not how science/history works. I will always be up for debate, and that debate will change if new information becomes available. I could have come from a lab, but more likely it came from the wet market. We will likely never know for sure.
So would you classify government's or anyone else's attempt at shutting down the debate on social media as anti-science?
In general, yes. I don't like any official attempts at stifling scientific debate. However the government is allowed to push back hard on misinformation. And personally I have no trouble saying STFU to someone who is just spouting BS. But with those exceptions the BS side is not debating in good faith.
You tell yourself to STFU a lot it seems.
No. We thinking humans know for sure. You don't.
Yes, we do know. You're ignoring the facts.
Why would you still think the wet market theory is the better explanation at this point? The logical foundation for the theory has always been weak. The forensic evidence has contradicted it. All that is missing from the lab leak theory is the specifics of who, why, when, and how for patient zero. The general concept is there and some of those details can be surmised in spite of powerful actors suppressing them.
Seriously, you can't be this dumb. I get being a rabid partisan, but the lengths you go to defend your tribe even after the defense has been broadly abandoned is insane.
No, it didn’t “more likely come from the wet market” you racist twat.
Only the most gullible of morons would act like it's totally random that the worst viral outbreak in a century just happened to occur in a city with a lab studying that type of virus, and allegedly engaged in efforts to increase the "gain of function" of said virus, when some of the earliest human fatalities occurred among researchers at said lab.
I was born in the morning, but I wasn't born this morning.
I think the lab leak is very plausible but so is the wet market. Afterall, they were the source for prior outbreaks and geeze what could possibly go wrong in a place like that.
The idea that the Chinese had an accidental containment breach at a sophisticated scientific research facility is obviously racist.
It was clearly dirty foreign peasants lust for weird ethnic food and absolute disdain for any sort of sanitation standards. Yeah, much less racist and totally backed by facts.
(Pretty much everyone has discounted the 'wet market' theory by now, including the US government)
"I could have come from a lab"
We're pretty sure you're just a cheap bot, so yeah, lab.
The rampant and strident protestations and personal attacks (some directly coordinated by Fauci per his own emails) against anyone who dared to express even a hint of doubt that might point at the lab leak theory did nothing but bring forth the canard "The lady doth protest too much, methinks".
I would have found an answer like, "Well the two previous coronavirus epidemics were ultimately traced back to zoonotic sources, but there's certainly a non-zero chance that it did originate as a leak from the Wuhan lab." to be utterly sensible.
But NOOOOO. We had vicious attacks on the professionality, intelligence, honesty, etc. of pretty, much anyone who even acknowledged the remotest possibility of a lab leak. They were SO vituperative about it all that a reasonable person might wonder "Why are they being this way?" and coming up with "Coverup" as a perfectly rational rationale.
" I(t) will always be up for debate"
Weird how this is. It is not the case with any progressive shibboleth. You sound like you ain't "trusting the science"
"more likely it came from a wet market"? Not a chance honey. There is ZERO support for that hypothesis. NO DATA supports it.
Id be interested to know the exact number.
Also, how many Americans had their lives ruined, how much substance abuse, depression, suicide resulted. How many people had their rights violated by mandatory experimental med injections, and how many kids are still behind due to draconian and ill thoughtout policies that kept them out of school at a time that is key for developement.
Id like to know all that.
That's all been studied. Of the roughly 1.2 million excess deaths, a bit over 1 million died OF covid. The remaining 200,000 excess died of causes that were almost certainly not covid at all. Some of those may well have died from 'excessive societal reactions' to covid. Others died because that's what happens in recessions.
As I said - that's all been studied. I doubt you are really interested at all.
It's all been studied huh? You sure packed a lot of bullshit into one paragraph. Kudos on your brevity.
Yes. This period has been a goldmine for empirical studies.
Empirical? Not even close. "Cause of death" was anecdotal throughout the entire pandemic.
Nothing is empirical when there is a bounty involved for reporting it
Yes, the garbage stats have been metastudied. As I said above, GIGO.
The studies the included the numbers before states like Colorado and Florida reduced their death totals 30% FROM covid when they realized a DUI crash killing someone isn't covid related.
You've been wrong at every step and continue to pretend to not have been so.
But Jesse, he is obviously one of our betters!
toll since Donald Trump declared a national emergency five years ago.
lol
Hey Ron, now that we've gotten the think pieces on Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, where my article on Paxlovir at?
The whole wuhan virus event was fake and gay
"Gay" as in homosexual? No because viruses do not have sexes. "Gay" as in a fun time? Also no because no one enjoyed covid.
Since the left can't meme, I'll help you out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iz8feYskRpk
That is profoundly stupid and it is an honor to be associated with a group that is unable to create that.
If you want to continue to be profoundly unfunny to the point of having zero sense of humor or ability to relate to average people, you are welcome to do that.
I want the democrats to continue to be woke scolds. Let's pick some more 20/80 issues for your team to champion. It's a great strategy in a democracy to pick unpopular policies and just drive that nail.
Be as annoying as possible. Have you considered adhering your hand to the pavement in the middle of rush hour, or throwing soup on a priceless work of fine art?
Actually a whole lot of authoritarians and "work from home" government employees enjoyed covid a lot.
They were a small fraction of workers. Most of us were "essential" and worked as usual right through it.
I worked right through and business was great. But then inflation sucked it all back so...
I enjoyed it until my company and most other businesses implemented mandatory masking. The lack of traffic in the DC area was great and the sort of people I don't want to put up with generally stayed home. I missed community events, but had some great backyard parties.
I sure enjoyed travelling during Covid!
1.2 M deaths from covid does seem to be the best estimate we have. In two years, one in 300 people in the US died of covid.
Yeah, but we gained that back in OnlyFans content creators.
That was mildly funny, I’ll give you that.
Lol. 3M people in the us die every year. Fuck off.
Most of that under Biden. Goddamn, is there anything he didn’t suck at?
(That’s if your numbers were right, which they are not.)
That is funny. I know thousands of people, and only one person personally who died from COVID, somewhat older ~67, overweight, not active, early in the event, and put of a ventilator (death sentence).
On the other hand, almost every one I know, 1) was vaccinated and 2) got COVID anyway. Yawn. Few days of a flu. Paxlovid was WAY worse.
We douched our economy for nothing, except a test of the World Government Totalitarians thirst for power (insatiable!). Never again.
Garbage.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#Comorbidities
5% of total Covid deaths were solely attributed to Covid, and the average Covid-related death had 4 other comorbidities.
GIGO
That really is the problem with this.
Notably, they also calculated that the U.S. actually experienced 3,456 fewer than expected deaths of Americans aged 14 and under during that period.
This is the info that should have been understood much earlier. As early as Feb 25 2020 I was posting that covid is NOT seasonal flu - it is not flu - it really doesn't affect the young. Other commenters who had seen the data understood the same thing. From my linked comment FACT is this Covid19 virus is overwhelmingly deadly to the elderly, the diabetic, and people with pre-existing heart/lung problems. NOT infants or the young/healthy. The preliminary fatality rates range from 15% for the over-80's to a bit less than 1% for the young/healthy. The info - even preliminary - WAS KNOWN THEN.
This should have had a huge impact re school closures after the first couple months (where other stuff was still very unknown). But the reality is that 'this is just like the flu' was a pervasive meme that hindered understanding of covid - especially for the young. For the 2020/2021 school year, schools were not closed 'for the kids'. They were closed 'for the teachers unions'.
I mean its good that excess deaths actually dropped among kids - while significantly rising among every other age group. But it also indicates that those school closures and kid restrictions were overkill. Many fewer kids died of cars, accidents, drowning, playing, kids being kids, etc - and covid was never going to kill them.
What I find interesting is that only Greenland had reduced deaths in aggregate. IOW - covid happened, it was a pandemic, and it killed people unlike what the stupid lying wing of the commentariat here still believes.
The rich countries that had the fewest relative excess deaths were: New Zealand, Oman, Qatar, and Denmark.
The rich countries that had the most relative excess deaths were: Italy, US, UK, Greece, Poland, Chile.
Some countries handled the virus much better than other countries did. The evidence is dead people.
it killed people unlike what the stupid lying wing of the commentariat here still believes.
Please quote any of us saying COVID was not killing anyone.
Jfree still can't explain why covid death rates matched age based death rates in percentages. Almost as if it was primarily with and not due to.
Well you actually make some good points here. But as far as I know no one denies that covid killed people. But the fatality rate even with the heavily massaged numbers is less than the 1968 flu. Was it a pandemic? Sure it was because like every virus it didn't respect borders. But it was a flu. It started like flu. It adapted and evolved like a flu. Humans developed immunities to it like a flu. It was obviously a manufactured flu and a bad one but it was otherwise not particularly notable. Wading through the excess fatality numbers is not particularly helpful because we've never had the same level of insane response to a flu before. Who died from/with covid and who died from the authoritarian response and who has an incentive to cover their ass for their crimes against humanity leaves us in a place where facts will probably be filtered through AI and leave us with the same conventional wisdom that idiots like Bailey are currently desperately trying to create. Every statistic and every conclusion reached is a lie. That's where we are.
it is not and was never 'flu'. It was classified as a respiratory virus for purposes of autopsies. There really are no hidden causes of death, no hidden bodies. Whatever was ever reported in media had nothing to do with empirical studies. Not all statistics are lies and it in fact is quite easy to drill down into studies to see which ones are valid and which are dubious.
Those people who chose to acquire info about a virus/pandemic via a political lens remain profoundly ill informed. Stupid even. But whatever they continue to believe - now and in future - has nothing to do with what really happened then
Good advice. You should take it.
Are you claiming that the Covid virus was a kind of flu virus?
And yet California mandated COVID vaccination for kids to go back to school. And then found out that RSV was the bigger threat, since their immune systems didn't develop properly after a year in lockdown.
Yes, the stats are foggy because we die from multiple causes...
That said... For ALL of Ye PervFectly EVIL anti-vaxxers...
Killing people is good ass long ass anti-vaxxers have their way in promoting anti-vaxism ass THE most fashionable of ALL Marks of Tribal Virtue!!!
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status?country=~All+ages
Just LOOK at the interactive graph right at the top of this link!!!! COVID deaths among the unvaccinated VASTLY outnumbered, and still outnumber, the deaths among the vaccinated!!! WHY do You Perfectly Lust SOOOO Much for death and suffering, LYING servant and serpent of communicable diseases?!?!
PS, "food" is dangerous! People get sick and even die from food poisoning!!! Be SAFE!!! STOP eating!!!!
And still no one is loudly proclaiming the need to pass laws restricting the declaration of emergencies to bypass the legislative process.
How many "excess deaths" from lock downs and people not going to the doctor for their routine issues or having say colonoscopies or even PSA tests. I wonder the rates of cancer deaths for example...did they go up?
Cancer deaths:
2019 - 599,589
2020 - 602,342
2021 - 605,206
2022 - 608,366
The absolute numbers went up each year. The age adjusted rate (per 100,000 peeps) went down each year.
So basically - near zero excess deaths were cancer related.
Not really a surprise. The excess deaths were:
Covid related
Hospital capacity related during the 'crisis' times
Depression/recession related
The second tended to be far more acute/emergency than cancer. The third tended to be violence/drug/alcohol/mental health related
Just look at those groomed numbers. The chance that data as chaotic as cancer deaths rise by 3k every year for 4 years? Statistically impossible.
What's far more impressive about the "groomed numbers" for cancer deaths in the US is how long the "grooming" occurred before Covid.
2014 - 591,686
2015 - 595,919
2016 - 598,031
2017 - 599,099
2018 - 599,265
The real chaos and volatility in those deaths was hidden for years. Decades really if you want to look back further in time. Of course, the groundwork for Covid was set in place for so long for the explicit purpose of ensure that the manipulation would go undetected. Fortunately you and your ilk are far too bright to fall for that manipulation and grooming. You know the real numbers don't you. And sometime soon, you will reveal those chaotic numbers to the world. The conspiracy will be revealed. Moronic putz's like you will be proven to be right - finally.
Strange argument, that if someone hadn't had comorbidities, Covid wouldn't have killed them so their deaths don't really count as Covid-caused.
Strange game. It seems the only winning move is not to play.
Beat that straw man.
Really? You can see that argument on this page of comments.
Covid wouldn't have killed them
This part you smuggled in, which no one has argued, is what makes your comment a strawman.
5% of total Covid deaths were solely attributed to Covid, and the average Covid-related death had 4 other comorbidities.
Nobody believes any of this nonsense anymore, unless they're somehow and for some reason still in on it (or don't want to admit that they were hoodwinked).
COVID was a scam. Maybe the virus was real and genuinely affected some people (perhaps even mortally), but the response to it was a scam in every single way shape and form. From lockdowns to social distancing to masks to school closures to remote working to the vaccine - every iota of it was nonsense.
Who cares how many Americans "died" of COVID-19. The better question is how many had their lives or livelihoods ruined in one way or another by the media-instigated politically-motivated kabuki-theater hypochondria they made of it.
Why don't you ask that question, Ronald?
No one seems to ask why there were no lockdowns during the swine flu pandemic.
The whole idea for lockdowns came from a 14-yea-rold girl's science fair project!
Altruist Totalitarian is up there with Robert Dear, another shining example of the death-worshipping Comstockist coercion movement.
You're still wearing the mask, aren't you. Fag.
The seminal paper on this subject is not the garbage put out by the modelers at the Imperial College, it is a paper by Ioannidis. Pulled from the abstract. IOW, Ron is full of shit.
The IFRs had a median of 0.034% (interquartile range (IQR) 0.013-0.056%) for the 0-59 years old population, and 0.095% (IQR 0.036-0.119%) for the 0-69 years old. The median IFR was 0.0003% at 0-19 years, 0.002% at 20-29 years, 0.011% at 30-39 years, 0.035% at 40-49 years, 0.123% at 50-59 years, and 0.506% at 60-69 years. IFR increases approximately 4 times every 10 years. Including data from another 9 countries with imputed age distribution of COVID-19 deaths yielded median IFR of 0.025-0.032% for 0-59 years and 0.063-0.082% for 0-69 years. Meta-regression analyses also suggested global IFR of 0.03% and 0.07%, respectively in these age groups.
Sadly, we're never going to have anything remotely close to a true answer to this, because in one of the absolute worst policy decisions ever made in American history, the government gave hospitals a massive financial incentive to state that everyone during that time died of COVID, whether they did or not, so none of the hospital data from that period can be trusted, at all.
It sucks that this is going to be a series of articles.
Give Ronald a break. He hasn't seen the sky or touched grass since 2019.
It sucks because the pro-COVID Fascism crowd has not learned a thing and still clings to the 2020 narrative.
One sneaky thing always frustrates me in these scare stories: they conveniently leave out time. It doesn't matter that 1.2m or 2.2m or even 100m people may die, if the time period is undefined. A year? A decade? Centuries? Ron doesn't include the end-date of his measurement until the very end of the article, when he bounds it from March 2020 to present (5 years). 1.3m = 260k/year is a lot of people. It's also remarkably close to Ioannidis' and Battacharya's predictions -- you know, the guys who were completely vilified for not screaming that the sky is falling. Once again, the cooler heads have prevailed.
It was An Unparalelled Invasion, sho 'nuff. It moved in the opposite direction, over forty years behind the schedule Comrade Jack London had worked out, but it was a homecoming.
Why are excess deaths automatically considered covid-19 deaths? Were they actually caused by the disease, or by the government generated panic over the disease? For example, how many people died of strokes because they couldn't get medical care? I was expecting a more thoroughly researched article.
An English teacher would tell you to put your near-the-end sentence at the top as a topic sentence : "This is close to the rate reported by Bhattacharya and his colleagues back in 2020."
Else this is a laundry list with no coherence and no point