DOGE Isn't Exempt From FOIA Requests, Judge Rules
The judge found that the agency's "unusual secrecy" and "substantial authority" make it subject to public record laws.

Citing the agency's "unusual secrecy" and "substantial authority over vast swathes of the federal government," a federal judge ruled Monday that Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is likely subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and must respond to public records requests from a watchdog group.
U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper issued an opinion and preliminary injunction finding that Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a traditionally left-leaning government watchdog group, was likely to prevail on its claims that DOGE was covered by FOIA and is entitled to expedited processing of three requests for records from the agency, formerly the U.S. Digital Service (USDS).
Although Musk, a close adviser to President Donald Trump, has repeatedly said in social media posts and statements to press that DOGE is "maximally transparent," the White House moved the cost-cutting agency from the Office of Management and Budget and placed it under the umbrella of the Executive Office of the President, which is largely exempt from FOIA requests.
CREW filed a FOIA lawsuit in February seeking to compel DOGE to comply with its records requests. In response, lawyers for the U.S. government argued that the agency was no longer subject to the transparency law.
However, Cooper disagreed, citing numerous media reports that described the vast, independent power wielded by DOGE, as well as the intense public interest in the agency's operations.
"Congress needs the requested information in a timely fashion to use it effectively," Cooper wrote. "The electorate also requires the expeditious production and publication of this information. Voters may seek to influence congressional representatives to take action responsive to USDS at any point along the road. And '[t]he dissemination of information' sought by CREW would contribute 'to an informed electorate capable of developing knowledgeable opinions and sharing those knowledgeable opinions with their elected leaders.'"
"The public would be irreparably harmed by an indefinite delay in unearthing the records CREW seeks," Cooper concluded.
Cooper also ordered DOGE to preserve the records at issue, noting with a certain amount of judicial restraint that DOGE staffers "may not fully appreciate their obligations to preserve federal records."
The order is a victory for CREW, although Cooper did not grant the group's request to force DOGE to produce documents before Congress faces a looming government shutdown.
"Now more than ever, Americans deserve transparency in their government," CREW Executive Director and Chief Counsel Donald Sherman said in a press release. "Despite efforts and claims to the contrary, the government cannot hide the actions of the US DOGE Service. We look forward to the expedited processing of our requests and making all the DOGE documents public."
DOGE's stated goal of opening the operations of the federal government to public scrutiny is admirable and much-needed, but it will fail if it can't show the public it's willing to practice what it preaches. Cooper's order should be a wake-up call to the Trump administration that it won't be able to coast on empty promises of transparency for long.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The judge is an Obama appointee which means the ruling doesn't count.
[Edit I think i will stay off this glitchy shitsite more again]
*sound of champagne popping*
LOL Oh god was I hoping to see the rejoicing of the right-wing incel brigade at the prospect of me leaving. I feel your pain, losers.
DOGE should be renamed STOOGE!
You won’t be missed!
Delicious.
What? The last load of jizz you greedily swallowed?
Just make sure the door doesn't hit your ass on the way out.
This isn't an airport.
Judges make a lot of bad rulings, this one ranks near the top. Not just bad, embarrassingly bad. It will soon be reversed.
Stooge department should be transparent. A bunch of unknown punks given given unusually large powers...not ethical and ripe for political abuse.
How's that different from regular government?
It will probably be a surprise to an ignoramus such as yourself but "Stooge department should be transparent" is not the legal standard anywhere, except in your broken little mind and maybe some as yet undiscovered planet in another galaxy.
You were fine with that before. What's different now?
DOGE doesn't have vast independent powers. The judge seems to have made a bad ruling that is uninformed.
I don't think vast independent powers it the requirement.
Is it a government agency subject to the request?
That doesn't matter because JesseAZov, the russian asset, lies. It's all he ever does.
Fuck off and die, slimy pile of lying lefty shit.
Do you get disability pay for this level of retardation?
From the article.
However, Cooper disagreed, citing numerous media reports that described the vast, independent power wielded by DOGE, as well as the intense public interest in the agency's operations.
If they are akin to advisors to the president generally FOIA exclusions exist to stop release until post presidency.
By that description they sound like more than just advisors.
Isn't DOGE more akin to a government agency?
It's a department to advise on system/network updates as formed. Modernization of their databases and such.
That was my reaction as well - they are subject to the request but the reasoning the judge followed to get there is wrong.
It does seem baffling to see judge's use media stories as evidence with nothing to actually bolster the claim.
"Despite efforts and claims to the contrary, the government cannot hide the actions of the US DOGE Service. We look forward to the expedited processing of our requests and making all the DOGE documents public."
Awwww, ain't that adorable? He actually thinks the Trump administration is going to abide by court decisions that they don't like.
When has he not abided by them? Can you name one single time?
You did not mind when Biden DID ignore then, but are quite upset about Trump who has not done so.
Yes, yes, I know. Anyone who says anything about Trump is a hypocrite who didn't complain when Democrats did the same thing, and that makes whatever Trump does ok. You guys say this to every comment and every article critical of Trump.
Oh, and guess what? Jesse has already said it's ok for Trump to ignore court rulings because Andrew Jackson, a Democrat who famously told the court to screw, did it first.
I double dog dare you to show one actual instance of Trump ignoring courts. He tries all sorts of sneaky things, but far as I can tell, has always backed off when the courts rule against him.
Unlike Biden, who bragged of ignoring the Supreme Court concerning student loans, and even knowing what he was going to was unconstitutional.
Did I say he has? Read what I wrote. Read it again. No, I did not. Your reading comprehension is as bad and dishonest as Jesse, Jesse Jr.
""Did I say he has?""
You sure are projecting it though.
Does that say that he has done so in the past? No, Jesse Jr., it does not.
If he hasn't done it in the past, then why would you be so stupidly sure that it will suddenly happen? Fucking moron.
Your phrasing indicates that you did. Why don’t YOU try reading what you wrote.
" He actually thinks the Trump administration is going to abide by court decisions that they don't like."
Yeah, like Biden did when it came to the student loan SCOTUS decision.
Democrats did it first, that makes it ok. Yes I know.
I don’t disagree, and if he ever does the same as Biden, I’ll be happy to call it out. Until then it’s more like: Democrats did it.
Sarc isn’t capable of seeing another other than ‘Orange man bad!’
"Democrats did it, and I didn't/don't care. I believe that Trump will do it, despite no supporting evidence, so people who point out my hypocrisy and retarded takes are just mean." -sarc
I assume those records are stored with the Jan 6 documents?
Here are your 40 pages filled with black squares. Enjoy your information.
That will be $1 million dollars.
can they do that and not charge us for the toner?
Oh. You WILL be charged for the toner. And the paper. And filing fees. And administration fees. And administration supervision fees. And legal council. And secondary legal council. And environmental review. And snacks. And drinks.
"DOGE Isn't Exempt From FOIA Requests, Judge Rules."
Gee, does this mean I get to file an FOIA request on unredacted files from the IRS, FBI, CIA, etc.?
No?
I didn't think so.
Can you file FOIA requests? Absolutely.
Will some of those requests be refused for reasons that line up to one or more of the specified exceptions in the FOIA law? Almost certainly.
Will the responses you get be guaranteed unredacted? No.
Why do you think a request for DOGE-related records would be any different?
in the long history of stupid rulings this place has jumped on board with prior to adults stepping in this is the stupidest
The ruling doesn't matter. Trump will ignore it and you guys will defend him.
I like to ignore rulings for several reasons but so far despite my advice this administration is adhering to them until further rulings
Reminder. Sarc thinks it is just fine to ignore border and immigration laws.
Can you name an instance where he has done so?
I'll keep asking until you present a single example.
I didn’t say he has, dipshit. I said he will. If I’m wrong I’ll buy you a beer.
Your phrasing frequently indicates that he has. So stop lying.
So are we ignoring bathroom full of confidential records at Mar-a-Lago because it wasn't a ruling ? Just long-established rules and norms of the records act ?
Didn’t you hear? Biden did it too so that makes it ok.
This has been done to death. So fuck off. You’re just repeating discredited lies because your other narratives have fallen apart.
America has just about figured out that it needs to rid itself of your kind. So get ready for Hell.
Sarc’s hypocrisy on display. As usual.
No problem. This audit agency should provide all the data it has about audits that is not private or classified. That would exclude all the data people have filed suits to keep DOGE out of, since that is "private" or "classified".
We can't have the government giving everyone access to the data that people have argued DOGE shouldn't have. That would be irresponsible.
Oh, and it will take as long as the COVID information to release, since that was a reasonable throughput for a much larger organization. You know, like 10 pages a month...
Very good point. Trump/Doge/secretaries cant see the Data per activist judges, but CREW can it seems.
A judge who sites corporate media reports which are actively campaigning against DOGE is not a reasonable judge, but rather is an activist judge.
What is DOGE being "unusually secretive" about?
I agree that DOGE should be covered under FOIA, but how much super secret shit, that needs to be immediately known, could they possibly have been up to in the past 7 whole weeks? Leftists are really, really scared about something.
Bureaucracy dies, kicking and screaming, in the daylight. Goodbye unaccountable Leftist shit-stains.