EPA Agrees To Reduce Federal Regulatory Authority in West Virginia
Giving more power to states is good for the environment.

This week, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin approved West Virginia's bid to regulate Class VI carbon dioxide (CO2) storage wells in the state. The United States is a global leader in energy production and emissions reduction. This announcement will allow it to continue its leadership in both.
Class VI injection wells were established in 2010 by the EPA to store carbon dioxide in deep rock formations more than a mile underground and well below the water table. The agency also regulates five other classes of underground injection wells that are not as deep (but still deep enough to protect public health) including those that store industrial waste, fluids from mining operations, and radioactive waste.
The emissions reduction potential from Class VI storage is potentially enormous; the Department of Energy estimates the country's geological storage capacity ranges from 2.2 trillion metric tons of CO2 to 21.2 trillion metric tons of CO2. For context, the U.S. emitted a little more than 4.8 billion metric tons of CO2 in 2023. Commercial-scale geological storage is also safe and has been around for nearly 30 years in other countries with a remarkable safety record.
Despite these benefits, government inefficiencies and years-long permitting timelines have hamstrung the establishment of Class VI wells in the United States. Since their inception in 2010, the EPA has permitted the construction of only eight Class VI wells. Only two of these have actually injected CO2 underground.
Even though the EPA received more than $48 million from the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to facilitate grants to states establishing Class VI programs, and an additional $25 million from the same bill for program administration, the agency still faces a permitting backlog for these projects. The EPA is currently reviewing 56 projects, representing 161 wells. Several of these applications have not been completed within the agency's goal of 24 months.
To circumvent the federal regulatory labyrinth, the EPA allows states to apply for primacy to permit and regulate injection wells within their respective borders. To date, four states—North Dakota, Wyoming, Louisiana, and now West Virginia—have been given this authority.
Primacy shrinks the size of the federal government in state operations (the EPA still retains oversight authority over all state injection wells) which in turn gets projects up and running faster. North Dakota, for instance, permitted and approved its first Class VI well within eight months of receiving primacy in 2018. Together, North Dakota and Wyoming—which was granted primacy in 2020—have issued permits for 18 injection wells. Louisiana has had primacy since 2023 and is currently reviewing more than 80 Class VI applications.
With primacy in hand, West Virginia is well-positioned to advance underground carbon storage projects. Fidelis New Energy has plans to build a hydrogen fuel production facility coupled with underground CO2 storage in Marshall County, West Virginia, and Tri-State CCS is exploring geological carbon storage in three of the state's counties. Advanced Resources International, which is the recipient of federal funding, has also announced plans to develop a Class VI well in Marshall County.
Primacy returns power to states, which are better positioned than federal agencies to meet and respond to the environmental needs of their communities. The EPA should recognize this and rescind its regulatory overreach to bring more environmentally beneficial projects online.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Why do they want plants to die?
When the plants die, they can grant big subsidies to their buddies to put up solar farms.
(Maybe they are storing the plant food underground to protect it?)
Trying to figure out why libertarians think carbon dioxide is a pollutant. I agree it's a revolutionary concept but also stupid. Even Jacob Sullum isn't that stupid. Or is he?
Great catch. True libertarians denounce science because science is leftist. Same with economics, math, logic, critical thinking, and anything else that involves engaging one's brain.
Really? How many people chanting Global Warming Change! have their brains engaged?
How many people chanting Global Warming Change! have brains?
There are two parts to this global warming thing. There is the science, and there is the politics. For those of us who can separate the two (that doesn't include you) it's possible to accept the science (I say science, not computer models) and shun the politics. Because you can't separate the two you feel that science is leftist because you reject the politics.
Are these the same people who believed global cooling, the "energy crisis," the hole in the ozone, the population bomb, etc. was science too?
You're not separating the science from the politics. Bad politics based upon good science doesn't make the science bad.
It is mostly the
global coolingno wait,global warmingno wait, "climate change" people that have been politicizing science for decades.carbon dioxide is a pollutant
In the atmosphere where it's currently at around 0.04% but has been naturally recorded as being as high as 8-10% and which humans exhale it at around 4%... it's a pollutant. Underground where all the other CO2 has been fixed via oxidization/mineralization and there is no CO2 is where it should be... naturally... once we pump it there.
Short history of carbon,
1. It Came From Outer Space!
2. Tragically it was sequestered underground and didn't do anybody any good.
3. Humans liberated it and bought Mustang convertibles.
4. The species thrived surrounded by vegetation and tripped over delicious food littering the ground.
Alternate history,
3. It remained underground.
4. The planet is uninhabited.
'Giving more power to states is good for the environment.'
But bad for the blob, the WEF, and Klaus.
Primacy returns power to states, which are better positioned than federal agencies to meet and respond to the environmental needs of their communities.
That is often true - but the reason EPA exists is because conflicts within states made pollution both worse and unresolvable. Specifically, the Cuyahoga River drains through Cleveland. It was so polluted that it literally burned multiple times - see the Randy Newman song Burn On. The city of Cleveland tried to clean it up within Cleveland (even approved a bond issue) but the Ohio legislature deliberately prevented any cleanup of the river outside the city limits. That was where the main crap was being dumped precisely because it was free to dump crap outside and upriver of the city limits and because it was very cheap for the polluting companies to buy legislators. When the river burned in mid-1969, it became a big national story that fit the times.
That sort of conflict within states - between cities/munis v rural areas - is very problematic.
Do you think CO2 burns?
Why can't the federal judiciary in the name of justice (laws ensuring Justice) handle it; having one State sue the other for down river pollution?
Why does your kind always make excuses to build an UN-Constitutional National Nanny-Tyranny?
Do you really think a Nanny-Agency is better for Liberty and Justice than actually ensuring Liberty and Justice for all?
Do you know what state Cleveland is in? Do you know what states the Cuyahoga River flows through?
Do you know why those are relevant questions re your brain farts of how things work?
Of course you don't
Did you say one single word that justified an EPA over ensuring Justice for all?
Nope.
"Giving more power to states is good for the environment."
This is true, so eliminate the EPA and let the states and counties handle any and all environmental issues.
Oh, wait.
That makes sense.
What was I thinking?
Giving more power to states is good for the environment.
Yes, we must protect the right of West Virginians to dispose of old appliances and tires by throwing them in to the creek.
Your case belongs in court.
Not an excuse for building a nanny nation.
Course building a tyrannical nanny nation was actually your point wasn't it. Not like you really believe W. Virginia doesn't have any littering laws on it's books already.
And all the plants got together and decided to store all Oxygen underground to save the animals! /s
Sometimes people actually can be dumber than plants especially when they get power-trips off of having control of a monopoly of 'Gun' dictation/theft.
" Commercial-scale geological storage is also safe and has been around for nearly 30 years"
Make that 70 years- caverns vast enough to hold a million barrels of LNG where cut into Philadelphia's granite subbasement in the 1950's.