The Media Love Negative Trends, but America Keeps Moving in the Right Direction
Remember the bee apocalypse? The U.S. reversed that trend. What other trends can we reverse?

A few years ago, the media were abuzz with some bad news: Bees were dying out in record numbers.
Many culprits were suggested. Climate change. Insecticides. A mysterious disease known as "colony collapse disorder" seemingly caused worker bees to spontaneously go on strike, wander off, and die. There was little consensus about what was happening, but the decline was noticeable and worrying.
The trend is now different. According to the most recent Census of Agriculture, the twice-per-decade federal counting of all domestic and farm animals in the United States, the number of bee colonies is up 31 percent since 2007. Due to how the Department of Agriculture collects those data, the bee renaissance may be somewhat less dramatic than reported—private organizations that also track the number of beehives say the recovery has been more gradual. Still, the line is moving in the right direction.

The same is true for many human health trends. After a few years of decline, life expectancy in the U.S. is once more on the rise, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported in 2024. The average American now lives to be 77.5, up from 76.4 last year (though still a bit short of the all-time high of 78.8, set in 2019).
The reversal of that downward trend is primarily due to two factors. First, the ebbing of the COVID-19 pandemic, which ended far sooner than it might have thanks to the rapid development of a vaccine. Second, a turning of the tide in the long battle against opioid overdose deaths, which declined by 14 percent between June 2023 and June 2024 relative to the previous 12 months.

Our political and media culture often seems to thrive on negative trends. But one measure of the strength of any society is what happens when things are going in the wrong direction. It requires clear ideas, people unwilling to accept decline with a shrug, and leaders who seek change rather than scoring populist points by blaming others for problems.
Wealth helps a lot too. The fact that so few Americans—about 11 percent, according to the Census Bureau—live in poverty means more resources are available for solving other problems, and more people have more time to spend thinking up solutions.
Simply reversing a bad trend is not cause for declaring "mission accomplished." Much more could be done to alleviate, for example, the opioid crisis—including the legalization of alternative ways to get high. The same is true for violent crime, which is once again falling in most American urban centers but could always be lower.
What will be the next negative trend to get reversed? Perhaps automobile deaths, which have climbed in recent years as Americans have opted for bigger vehicles and more distractions. Cars that do more (or all) of the driving for you will be a revolution for safety. In its latest public report, automated vehicle developer Waymo claims its newest technology is 3.5 times better than human drivers at avoiding accidents in real-world tests.

Disappointments and failures will always remain. Scarcity and death are still with us. But as America enters the second quarter of the 21st century, it is a resilient place where people—and bees—are living better lives.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "The Line Goes Up."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Speaking of trends, can anyone address Sullum's TDS-based writing trend?
I doubt it, nobody reads him; we just come for the comments.
TDS is just BDS with one letter changed because gullible idiots will parrot any talking point. Great job thinking for yourself.
Life Expectancy By Sex: ~76.4
Life Expectancy With Sex: ~76.4
Life Expectancy Of Sex: ~30.2
Life Expectancy Per Sex: ~23.8
Ironic story from Mr tariffs will kill all of us Boehm.
From the last chart, we need to address gender equity by killing off a few of the more obnoxious females.
Equity!
Girls have a higher rate of suicide attempts. Men have a higher rate of suicide deaths.
This shows that chicks should get paid less because men know how to get the job done!
Fun fact: every single honey bee is a foreign invader in the US. I guess they do the work that native bees refuse to do.
Nothing grew here until they were introduced!
The natives just raised and ate their horses.
That is literally true. Bee species are particular about which plants they will pollinate.
...
You trying to palm this off? It was not a sterilizing vaccine, and the pandemic lasted remarkably long after vaccinations began. Compare it to the flu pandemic of a century earlier.
Yeah, if it’s over, why are some idiots still wearing paper masks?
Paranoia and virtue signalling.
the COVID-19 pandemic, which ended far sooner than it might have thanks to the rapid development of a vaccine
Here for the comments.
First, the ebbing of the COVID-19 pandemic, which ended far sooner than it might have thanks to the rapid development of a vaccine.
HAHAHA!
Also, shouldn't we start talking about the death gap between men and women and what we can do to make sure more women die younger? I'm told that's the solution to wages. I suppose we could simply mandate women need to work in high-risk occupations and that might even fix both issues at the same time!
Am I doing this right?
/sarc
If we put more women in higher risk jobs, their death rate on the job would be even higher than men's. Women are smart to avoid such jobs.
If we put more women in higher risk jobs, their death rate on the job would be even higher than men's.
If Strong Wahmen fiction has taught me anything, it's that even highly-competent women will get the men around her killed at the same or greater rate than a man in the same position; frequently even sacrificing or killing a few herself strictly for self/gender-affirmation purposes.
Epidemiology is rife with similar trends and cyclical disturbances. One of the major reasons why government should have little or nothing to do with regulating free markets and transactions is that it is virtually impossible to get it right. Any reaction by anyone that does not include the long-term view is much more likely to engender unintended consequences. Regulating everything from drugs to bee epidemics DOES, however, giver power-hungry politicians the excuses they need to gain personal power at the expense of Liberty.
Staying at a hotel in Monterey, there was a book in the room regarding the sardine canneries. Historically, the catch was fairly stable until the evil 'factory ships' showed up and the catch fell off drastically.
Pretty standard story of 'evil human technology' until the last chapter where it was found that the sardine populations in the area are highly cyclical, and the 'factory ships' had little to do with anything.
there was a book in the room regarding the sardine canneries
Did it come with tooth picks to keep your eyes open?
The bee colony thing (in which its initial death was greatly exaggerated anyway), a slight uptick in life expectancy post-Covid, and a one-sentence reference to violent crime unsupported by statistics or thoughtful analysis of those statistics, is a pretty thin reed on which to write a "things are getting better!" story.
And your response is worthless.
And yet it was still more worthwhile than your response to his response. Go figure.
It seems worthwhile to point out that all the metrics used in the article to claim things are getting better could easily be offset by a handful of other things that are getting worse. Apparently, they don't need to be important things to offset the supposed gains either since all the listed points are basically bullshit and/or small potatoes, as Think it Through made clear.
According to a friend (who grew up in the Soviet Union), a Russian pessimist says "Things can't possibly get any worse."
A Russian optimist says "Oh, yes they can."
"...Apparently, they don't need to be important things to offset the supposed gains either since all the listed points are basically bullshit and/or small potatoes, as Think it Through made clear..."
Were you born full of shit or were you fed shit instead of formula?
See below: "Climate Change" is getting much improved, as are the number of prosperous people, the number of healthy people, the life spans of people.
"Remember the bee apocalypse? The U.S. reversed that trend. What other trends can we reverse?"
In '86, Hansen predicted, at the low end, a 3*F increase in world temps by 2020 (and 5.5* at the high end). Something under 2* was the result.
John Holdren, in '86, that (the now re-branded) climate warming-caused famines could kill as many as 1,000,000,000 people!
(both from "Fossil Future" Epstein, pg45 and 47)
>>What other trends can we reverse?
leftist authors crusading against public opinion?
Second, a turning of the tide in the long battle against opioid overdose deaths, which declined by 14 percent between June 2023 and June 2024 relative to the previous 12 months.
And you're just gonna whistle past that graveyard of reasons why that long, long... loooong incline of opioid deaths have seen a recent downtick, aren't you.
Which... *clears throat* which means that if we are "heading in the right direction" on opioid deaths, then the stuff we've started doing in around 2022... we should do harder, right? Because starting in around 2011 we did what we were doing then harder, and deaths went up, up, up, up, up, up, up, up, up. Then around 2022/2023 we started undoing some of those things and deaths have started going down-- which I predicted back in 2022 they would.
Are we running out of addicts?
Yes. See my comment below.
Close... we ran out of patience.
the COVID-19 pandemic, which ended far sooner than it might have thanks to the rapid development of a vaccine.
You people are never going to give up, are you?
Despite the fact that everyone I knew who got boosters immediately got COVID (and blamed the people who didn't get the shot for themselves getting COVID), and despite the fact that even the Branch Covidians admit that the shot does not prevent infection nor transmission (they all say that this was clear from the start and that no one claimed the shot would prevent infection/transmission), they all still believe in the shot. It's a mass hypnosis. There is no reasoning with these people.
This is retardation on a level that's hard to even comprehend. There are a couple of ways to interpret that statement.
1. For instance, 'ended far sooner' might suggest that the spread and transmission was halted in its tracks *thumps on table ala Rachel Maddow* due to the vaccine. false
2. 'ended far sooner' might be interpreted as millions of children and adults were spared an agonizing death due to the vaccines miraculous life-saving therapeutic properties: almost entirely false
If we give our intrepid author the benefit of #2, yes there was evidence that the vaccine reduced the likelihood of serious illness or death from a very, very, very low number to a very, very ,very, very low number. So well done you, Pfizer. But for the libertarian magazine of record to breeze past all the costs of abject intrusions and eviscerations of liberty, freedom of speech, bodily autonomy, and trust in public institutions which led directly to a second Trump term--- all those things that were done to achieve that miniscule benefit... this just makes me hang my head in disgust over what this magazine has become.
This is retardation on a level that's hard to even comprehend.
There is a reason why Vernon is on the block list. I'd suggest others do the same.
He was agreeing with vernon....
It's incredible how little recognition there is of the role of COVID fascism in the election of President Trump and GOP members of Congress.
The slowdown in overdose deaths is because addicts have been dying faster than they can be replaced. We'll see an uptick again when young people at risk age into their junkie years and start overdosing.
Agree to disagree. The streets are still largely overrun with homeless addicts. Almost every major blue city had in some way, a revolt against the policies which got us this shocking rise in overdose deaths. Blue city after blue city recalled their progressive mayors, soros-funded prosecutors, re-criminalized drugs in some way shape or form, reversed defundthepolice policies and even chased out communists from their city councils.
While I will agree that a problem as bad as the one we've seen over the last 15 years-- a problem that was not just allowed to grow, but encouraged at every turn to do so might... might begin to burn itself out. But it's hard to separate how much 'burning itself out' there is from "You're fired, soros prosecutor, you're fired, Mayor More Homeless Camps, you're fired, DefundThePoliceCouncil Member in District X."
The city I live in will now... hold on to your hat... will now arrest you if you have a meth lab on city property. You will actually go to jail for that. That represents a 180 shift from where we were between 2015 and 2021.
Libertarians in favor of the drug war!
You prefer hundreds of thousands of deaths from overdose? Yes, I know that's the principled libertarian position.
"What other trends can we reverse?"
How about government spending, or am I asking for the earth, moon and sky?
You're asking for action on Social Security, Medicare, and military spending. So, yes, the earth, moon, and sky.
Lots of positive trends the last 4 weeks, wonder why?
Biden set us up for success!
It would be helpful to notice, in the life expectancy chart, that women continue to live about 5 years longer than men. This difference has persisted at least since I was in high school in the '60's. There have been many attempts to account for the difference, but I've always found them unconvincing. That's because this difference is multi-factorial and not easily addressed in a single paper or graph. Within the US population, life expectancy varies both by sex and by race. Black men live shorter lives than White men, and White women live longer than Black men, White men, and Black women. White men live approximately as long as Black women.
Moreover, we can see this difference between the sexes in virtually every country in the world with adequate data, including those countries with overall life expectancy at birth greater than ours. FYI, the three countries with the longest life expectancy are Hong Kong, Japan, and South Korea.
Taking a longer view, of course, shows that life expectancy has been increasing worldwide since 1950, with both sexes and all races enjoying the benefits. It's easy to point to a few things that have driven this increase: sanitation, better nutrition, reduced infant and child mortality (aka effective vaccines and control of disease vectors). This is also a multi-factorial question, the answers to which may usefully be grouped under increasing standards of living. Does anyone believe any longer that complicated patterns of global economics can be explained by a single factor, e.g. capitalism or socialism? I thought not.
sanitation, better nutrition, reduced infant and child mortality (aka effective vaccines and control of disease vectors)
What is usually overlooked is that these improvements that extended life spans were mostly accomplished by women.
"What is usually overlooked is that these improvements that extended life spans were mostly accomplished by women."
Cite missing.
Dare I try to post a link on the modern internet? No, I dare not. But if you search for "bees are back nerdcore" on youtube, you might manage to find a music video of me rapping about the bee situation getting better, and its relationship to negativity bias.
"What will be the next negative trend to get reversed?"
Well, there's a great trend going on right now of an unpaid agency showing massive amounts of fraud and waste in the government.
Wouldn't it be nice if reason editors by and large supported this and asked why Democrats are fighting it every step of the way?