Schools Are Spending Billions To Fight Campus Culture Wars
As tensions rise on campus and in board chambers, districts dish out more for security, lawyers, and staff turnover.

The culture war is costing school districts billions, according to a report released in October 2024 by the UCLA Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access. The report surveyed superintendents at 467 school districts nationwide about extra expenditures they undertook because of increased conflict over culture war issues such as critical race theory, book challenges, gender-related debates, and other politicized topics. The report estimates that such fights cost school districts around $3.2 billion during the 2023–2024 school year.
Superintendents reported increased security costs, legal fees, and expenditures related to high staff turnover, as well as other culture war spending. One superintendent interviewed for the report said these cultural conflicts, at a level he considered "high," required his district to spend an extra $100,000 to hire "armed plainclothes off-duty officers.…because people coming to the board meetings are unpredictable and sometimes violent."
That district also incurred more than $500,000 in legal fees. The district faced high turnover as well, incurring "additional costs in excess of $80,000 for recruitment and development of new staff members to replace teachers, counselors, and administrators who left their positions because they did not want to work in such a divisive setting," according to the report.
The report broke down extra expenditures into three main categories—direct budgetary costs, indirect costs (those "associated with districts redeploying staff time to address challenges created by culturally divisive conflict"), and staff turnover costs.
Around two-thirds of surveyed superintendents reported moderate or high conflict in their districts. For those in moderate-conflict districts, researchers calculated that a district with 10,000 students could expect to spend more than $485,000 in additional costs (a combination of direct, indirect, and turnover-related costs). A high-conflict district of the same size could expect to spend over $811,000 more. Low-conflict districts would, in contrast, spend around $250,000 extra.
The intense culture war battles that have dominated many school districts over the past several years have real costs to taxpayers and students. When the debate over school curriculum becomes a fierce, divisive fight, districts are forced to divert funding away from students and toward responding to security, legal, and public relations concerns.
"Again and again, we heard stories of sizable expenses related to all this tumult—the money schools and school systems needed to spend on these issues….meant less money was available for other educational priorities," the report reads. "Across rural, suburban, and urban areas and in communities of all political persuasions, we heard that these costs could be sizable, and that they were meaningfully impacting the quality of education students received."
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Educulture Wars."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Let's not forget who started the culture war. The leftists can stop their aggression any time and the schools will save billions. Expecting the sane people to just surrender and shut up is not realistic.
The tout themselves as being for "democracy" but there is an inherent tension between technocratic rule by "experts". Especially when the experts are motivated by a radical ideology.
The Left changes definitions of words over time. Its a form of Newspeak.
'Democracy' to them no longer means 'democracy'. It means 'institutions' now. It means 'rule by technocracy' now. 'Our precious democracy' should be translated as 'our precious bureaucracy'.
'Managed democracy' is more than a Helldivers 2 meme.
There is no tension. The left liberals want technocrats to rule them. The only way that can happen is to abandon the meaning of democracy. Democracy (the people rule) actually means that no one rules above the people. If the people vote to place dictators over them then that's not democracy. If I do not consent to being ruled by dictators elected by the majority or a powerful plurality, it's also not democracy.
It's only a "war" because they are finally experiencing resistance.
"Culture War" is pretty much exclusively defined by Eeason staff as resistance to the progressive social ideology. You do not see the Progressives much criticized for pushing their social values.
It's not fair to make schools lawyer up for their open violations of law and the constitution such as race based programs. Sure the ussc has ruled multiple times, but they shouldn't have to pay for continuing to do it in violation.
To be fair, the vast majority of schools were well established, well-regarded, and relatively/voluntarily self-segregated *and settled* (as in, continuously operating for decades in direct counterpart to white/male schools) well before the push to make all-male and all-white schools mixed-sex and mixed-race while keeping white men out of all-female and all-minority schools.
Right.
Better headline: Schools Are Spending Billions Defending Themselves From Cultural Threats Internal and External
For the longest time, schools just wanted to teach you to be an engineer or read and write, for your own benefit, completely voluntarily. Now they have to contend with the various divine mandates to make every retarded, transgender, social degenerate equally employable to Peter Thiel or Elon Musk.
I’m always willing to accept the left’s total and unconditional surrender.
So members of a government bureaucracy are griping about having public oversight and the effects of democracy thwarting their bizarre ideology. We have to spend more money because you will not let us have our way with your children sounds rather passive-aggressive.
Yes, they need 6-figure private security because the proles are “unpredictable” and not taking whatever is shoved down their throats.
Also violent, because words are violence
Another causal chain trimmed to suit the stupid and lazy.
IF they are doing this then they are taking money from actual schooling and NOT DOING THEIR JOB.
I had a daughter in the shtawful DC schools. Do they spend enough on schooling. You tell me
"the District of Columbia spends significantly more per student on education than the national average, with figures around $27,425 per student compared to the national average of around $16,281. "
I tell you: The DC schools are shit, unless you are the Obamas, who sent their kids to
they attended the private Sidwell Friends School through high school graduation.
PreK–2: $51,410
Grades 3–4: $53,920
Grades 5–8: $57,150
Grades 9–12: $57,620
Jimmy Carter sent Amy to public schools.
YET and here is what galls me: Obama was one of the chief enemies of school choice.
Obama’s War on School Choice
https://www.cato.org/commentary/obamas-war-school-choice
THis is the Cato Institute you faux Libertarians.
The peasants are revolting!
Fuck these guys.
And these are the same type of bureaucrats that in Loudoun County Virginia tried to sick the FBI on the irate dissenting parents speaking in the school board meetings as terrorists.
The peasants are revolting!
Yeah, they stink on ice.
Maybe if the schools spent their time on academics instead of indoctrination the controversy would disappear.
Exactly +100000000.
...one of the many consequences of putting politicians in charge.
Only Gov - 'Guns' can teach children!/s
"'Guns' do everything" is the very thing that is destroying the USA.
Focusing on reading, writing, and arithmetic is totes white supremacy!
American education facing an undeclared emergency with some scores reaching 30-year lows — school choice now a moral imperative
By Tommy Schultz
Published Jan. 29, 2025, 5:44 p.m. ET
Fuck you, cut spending.
Let me guess. Trumps fault still despite democrats and judges stopping the attempts? You seemed to have no concern with the judges stopping it.
Please tell us your ideas here. Because your cut spending seems to fly in the face of your other support for anti trump by any means necessary actions. Prove you don't have TDS.
If I disagree with the voices in your head are you going to call me a liar?
So you can’t do it. No one is surprised.
Isn’t that what ending the retarded DEI policies is doing?
This is a positive sign, actually. If schools are wandering off-mission, they should be challenged on it.
Are you in doubt that schools are shit currently ?
Just two days ago
American education facing an undeclared emergency with some scores reaching 30-year lows — school choice now a moral imperative
By Tommy Schultz
Published Jan. 29, 2025, 5:44 p.m. ET
"cULtuRe wArS"
It's not a fight about culture. It's a fight between a dominant group in the University administrations that wants to force racism, segregation, Marxism and mental illness by using threats, false accusations and heavy censorship, and the people who are against that.
^THIS
but you forgot the 'armed-theft' funding the mental illness.
The #1 problem with 'armed-theft' is the lack of required *earning*.
Pipe-dreams and excuses becomes the 'earn' factor instead of a product/service anyone wants.
This is pure propaganda. There are about a dozen ways a libertarian could cover this report and just passing on the claims of a think tank whose founder is a professor of "Educational Equity" ain't one of them.
"Our district chose to implement divisive and controversial lesson plans, and now we have to pay a bunch of money to defend them," is not a sob story that Reason should be even implicitly backing up.
"One superintendent interviewed for the report said these cultural conflicts, at a level he considered "high," required his district to spend an extra $100,000 to hire "armed plainclothes off-duty officers.…because people coming to the board meetings are unpredictable and sometimes violent.""
There are DOZENS of Reason articles explaining how these claims of "Violent" board meetings are completely (ehem) trumped up fictions used by board members and council leaders as an excuse to stifle and avoid debate. And yet Ms Camp repeats the claims without a shred of irony.
For too long, Reason staff have thought that "reason" means letting liberals with credentials justify pushing unwanted ideas and values on the children of superstitious sky-god worshipers. They think that surely The Science!™ must be the best way to counter what they see as neolithic conservatives that are the real problem with society. This has put them in the awkward position of empowering bureaucrats with the ability to override the preferences and rights of parents.
To quote James Carville in Old School, "That answer was perfect. We have nothing to add."
This is pure propaganda. There are about a dozen ways a libertarian could cover this report and just passing on the claims of a think tank whose founder is a professor of "Educational Equity" ain't one of them.
Yeah.
Case in point: "conflict over culture war issues such as critical race theory, book challenges, gender-related debates, and other politicized topics"
Ctrl+f 'palest': 0 results.
Ctrl+f 'gaza': 0 results.
So the actual fucking violent obstructions and obstructionists that set fire to buildings, took hostages, and had to be removed by force... the causes, by far, more likely to have people showing up to shout down meetings get a pass, but the people and causes duly being brought up and discussed at the appropriate meetings, going through the proper channels to get their grievances heard or positions clarified, and explicitly not bugging anyone otherwise are the ones running up security budgets.
There are DOZENS of Reason articles explaining how these claims of "Violent" board meetings are completely (ehem) trumped up fictions used by board members and council leaders as an excuse to stifle and avoid debate. And yet Ms Camp repeats the claims without a shred of irony.
You're being too honest and high-minded about Reason and Emma here. She's deliberately playing the retarded "BOAF SIDEZ" bullshit like the 400 lb. dude with pink hair claiming to be a woman using bullhorn to dare people to remove them by force with a dozen other people chanting them on while the rest of the crowd tells them to sit down or leave is the same thing as the concerned parent taking their 2 min. to question how their tuition dollars are being spent and then sitting back down.
It's dishonest and immoral. Fuck Emma. Fuck Reason. Once again, they're part of the problem.
Yet male pink-haired trannies can scream and wave Palestine flags and disrupt Ben Shapiro and Conservative (including kidnapping and holding hostage!) all they want - and get NO extra security.
We are SICK AND TIRED of the double standards.
(Shit sorry mad.casual I didn’t see your reply before I hate-typed my own! But JFC we nearly said the exact same thing! Shows how much of a meme these idiots are at this point! Also, you said it far more eloquently!)
These kinds of articles is what you get when you don’t hire libertarian writers who can argue from first principles.
You both miss the boat (even miss the ocean)
Schools are doing disastrously poorly. I am a teacher. Even things like civics and ability to write, reading levels --- they are all sht
American education facing an undeclared emergency with some scores reaching 30-year lows — school choice now a moral imperative
By Tommy Schultz
Published Jan. 29, 2025, 5:44 p.m. ET
So the problem here is not that schools are aggressively pushing divisive, and often evil, culture war topics/praxis but that they are being challenged on it. Fuck these evil commies and all their defenders (looking at you Emma). Stop preaching racism and gender ideology, stop brainwashing and drugging kids you evil cultists.
You know what else they spend BILLIONS on?
Requirements of Commie-Indoctrination (i.e. GE) nobody would take without taxpayer funded over-lords demanding it and giving far too much ?credit? for stupid indoctrination.
Nobody said teaching stupid in Commie-Indoctrination camps for kids was going to be cheap. The good news is we all get to enjoy a bankrupt and dependent nation from it. right, right? /s
This is why if Trump closes the Dept of Education, it will be one of the greatest accomplishments in this early century.
There will always be busybody outrage where the people of California bitch and moan about the actions of some principle in Alabama (or vice versa). But when you centralize billions and billions of dollars at the Federal level, it gives those busybodies the leverage to force their values on the other team.
It is no coincidence that after Bush pushed through NCLB, the left made rapid strides in their coopting of K-12 ed around the country. So much money went to the federal bureaucracy where the marxists could push change after change after change.
"But when you centralize billions and billions of dollars at the Federal level, it gives those busybodies the leverage to force their values on the other team"
Well Said. D.C. The only state that contains 2.4 to 5 TIMES more wealth of any other state in the US and makes absolutely NOTHING to speak of.
“after Bush pushed through NCLB”
This is one of the main reasons I argue that “compassionate conservatism” as espoused by him and other republicans is just progressivism in a different package.
Trump was a direct repudiation of that RINO mentality.
Why does Emma.accept their definition of violence as legitimate? The only violence I've ever seen is from security on speakers the boards didn't want to hear from. They don't need armed security except to enforce their censorship campaign.
Also unmentioned and presumably missing from the costs are consulting fees and other costs to implement the divisive culture wars in the first place. The result is Reason's standard position that initiating culture wars is fine, only fighting back is a problem.
This article is a left wing press piece produced by a strong rap her rather than a journalist. It is beneath what Reason should be.
Schools Are Spending Billions To Fight Campus Culture Wars
Good.
What the fuck else would they understand?
Gee, maybe the schools shouldn't have crammed DEI, CRT, and trans-grooming into the schools - even going as far as hiding what they were doing from parents and siccing cops on those who complained?
If they had just stuck to their role as basic educators and stopped letting the blue-hairs diddle kids they'd be well loved.
If only there was a way to avoid these costs and divisive environments... if only there was a way...
But... alas, there the schools were, minding their own business when... ALL OF A SUDDEN!
Fuck off, Emma. Just fuck off.
Sorry, Emma but, "We want to give your children a Marxist education, and we want to be left alone while we do it" is not going to be the standard-bearer on any issue for culture war that I'm going to give a single shit about.
Anyone caught teaching Marxism should be put in prison.
Uh oh, the schools may have to dip into their Pride Month budget to defend themselves for illegal activities.
God damn you suck as a "libertarian" Emma Camp. She doesn't even offer another side in her article, just regurgitates UCLA leftist propaganda.
It's worse than you think:
She is straight out of Critical Theory central casting-- you know, that thing that wasn't being taught in the schools? That thing that didn't exist? That thing that wasn't even being taught that would be a disaster if it were banned?
Excerpt from her book: Learning Power, Organizing and Educating for Justice
This is naked Marxism, nothing less.
OK, so the ~1 paragraph two hours earlier above and the 'bio' immediately above gives off a sort of vibe about Oakes. A vibe that was totally validated and lame when Michelle Pfeiffer did it in 1995.
That said, looking into it, would you feel better if she were dead?
extra expenditures they undertook because of increased conflict over culture war issues such as critical race theory, book challenges, gender-related debates, and other politicized topics.
Seems like that's the easiest thing in the world to address to immediately solve the problem of the expenditures.
Want to save a couple billion a year? Stick to math, history, literacy, physical sciences, and shop. Practical skills for use by an incoming labor force.
Uhh no, it seems the schools are spending money defending themselves against attacks by those who want to fight culture wars.
No. Your kind is attempting to indoctrinate children in Marxism and multiple types of sexual deviancy. Parents are just trying to stop them. If you support the schools efforts here than you are a Marxist groomer. Just like Pedo Jeffy.
The US "culture war" can be summed up as follows:
Left - "Treat everyone with respect."
Right - "Hell no!"
Left - "Treat everyone with respect."
You misspelled "accept their mental delusions."
I'm always amused when left wingers pretend teaching children that their friends and classmates are oppressing them is teaching them respect. Once people understand the specifics of the left's program they reject it immediately. That's why they speak in generalities: to mislead you about what they are doing.
Left - "Treat everyone
with respect's insane and destructive ideas as valid, and allow us to teach them to your children."RightNormal People - "Hell no!"Uhhh no, you spent decades gradually infiltrating the tax-funded public school system in order to promote your opinions through the official curriculum. Just because it took the other half of your school district taxpayers a while to realize what you were doing and start objecting doesn't mean that what you were doing wasn't culture war. The only way to avoid culture war in public school districts is to stop propagandizing the students from the left and the right. Maths is culturally neutral until you assert that girls and children of color shouldn't have to demonstrate competence in maths. History is culturally neutral until you try to justify reparations and assign motivations instead of presenting historical facts. We're on to your tricks and pretending that you're a victim instead of one of the instigators no longer works.
I already said that the peasants are revolting, no need for your redundancy.
This is such a perfect illustration of Critical Theory married to Partisanship in action.
Because you are only capable of seeing things through an Oppressor/Oppressed lens, and because it's plain as day which side you're on, you necessarily categorize the schools as "Oppressed" because they're the ones on "your side" when it comes to trans, racism, and illegal alienage (among other things that have no place in education). And therefore anyone who has a problem with that is necessarily the Oppressor.
Meaning you characterize them as the "attackers" and the schools the ones on the "defense."
When the reality is that the schools would have never been in this position had they not put themselves in it in the first place. It's like coming between a bear and its cub, and then claiming that the bear is in the wrong for YOUR foolish actions. No, the bear is just doing what bears do.
It's the schools that made poor choices, and then doubled down to
spendwaste billions in order to rationalize that choice when NOBODY wanted them making it in the first place.You don't get to play the victim when you're smack in between of the FA and the FO.
As long as the administration allows the toddlers to call the shots nothing will ever change. Are there any adults left in higher education?
No. What did you think they spent the last two generations grooming them for? It was precisely that.
"As tensions rise on campus and in board chambers, districts dish out more for security, lawyers, and staff turnover."
All this would be moot if the parents of children were the ones who are responsible for paying and selecting their kid's schools instead of the taxpayers.
Reason: Schools Are Spending Billions To Fight Campus Culture Wars
Also Reason: FIRE sues UT for $250K for expelling a pharmacy student who said "I'm bout to write a book about the birds and bees entitled 'it started with a dick suck' because the truth is that's how most of us got here."
Also Also Reason: "Without CRT, how is anyone supposed to learn about slavery?" - FIRE
Fuck you Reason. Fuck you FIRE. You're part of the problem.
Emma, you forgot to mention how much school districts have to pay for mental health services to deal with the many issues gender diverse students bring with them. Sure, other kids whose gender doesn’t define them have problems too, but not at the same level.
So is the author saying this has anything at all to do with the frighteningly abysmal test scores? Another strawman courtesy of the woke faculty of my alma mater.
Emma and Rick James seem to me to show how the very issue is not understood. They cannot read, write, or do arithmetic.
If your grocery store is offering free cars, coffee and donuts, entertainment BUT THERE IS NO FOOD
Woke DEI poses an existential threat to the nation as it totally rejects both the Declaration of Independence and the Republic based on the US Constitution. The problem is that both the near-MAGA and the near-WOKE are vastly ignorant of the actual treat. Near-MAGA and near-Woke means those members of each party who really do not understand Woke. True Believers both distort their own version and those near-to-them accept the false version. Near-MAGA believe their kids are being coerced into changing sexual identity and having unwanted sex change operations on the noon lunch beak. The near-Woke believe that White America spends 100% of its time making certain that no minority every receives the fruits of his labor.
The rational center knows what both extremes are wrong, but the media knows that extremism sells very well, and thus, the media ignore the rational center.