Can Trump Rename the Gulf of Mexico With an Executive Order?
The most important thing in any name is not what some official institution or a collection of old maps says. Spontaneous order tends to rule the day.

Amid the head-spinning flurry of "Day 1" executive orders that stretched presidential power to new (and potentially illegal) heights, President Donald Trump attempted to leave his mark on the globe.
Literally.
As part of an executive order promising to restore "names that honor American greatness," Trump told acting Secretary of the Interior Walter Cruickshank to rename the Gulf of Mexico the "Gulf of America." Doing so, Trump wrote in the order, would reflect the gulf's status as a "flourishing economic resource and its critical importance" to America's economy and people.
But can he do that?
The answer is not straightforward. Technically, Trump ordered that the federal Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) should be updated to reflect the new name, and ordered the secretary to "remove all references to the Gulf of Mexico from the GNIS." Additionally, he ordered that "all federal references to the Gulf of America, including on agency maps, contracts, and other documents and communications shall reflect its renaming."
So, yes, as far as the federal government is concerned, the body of water between Florida and the Yucatan Peninsula will officially be the Gulf of America within the next month (the order allows 30 days for the change to be made).
Things are complicated by the fact that the Gulf of Mexico is a body of water that extends outside the borders of the United States—and thus beyond the bounds of federal law. There is no international body that officially names international bodies of water. The closest thing that exists is the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO), which was established in 1921 and aims "to ensure all the world's seas, oceans and navigable waters are surveyed and charted."
But don't expect the IHO to get involved here. "Today, there is no formal international agreement or protocol in place for naming maritime areas," John Nyberg, the organization's director, told The New York Times.
In reality, the name of any body of water is the result of spontaneous order—we call the Atlantic Ocean by that name because that's just what everyone unofficially agrees it is.
There are plenty of spots on the map where that order is significantly more fuzzy. Saudi Arabia, for example, insists that the Persian Gulf is really the "Arabian Gulf"—which is a bit confusing since the gulf is adjacent to the Arabian Sea, and because "Arabian Gulf" was an old-time name for what's now called the Red Sea. Japan and South Korea have never agreed on what to call the body of water that lies between the two countries. What Americans know as the South China Sea has a bunch of different names in the non-China countries that border it.
History might count for something too. The Gulf of Mexico has been called that since at least the early 1600s. Earlier this month, in an apparent attempt at trolling Trump, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum publicly displayed a map made in 1607 that not only included the "Gulf of Mexico" label. Notably, it also marked much of the current United States as "Mexican America."
Of course, powerful nations have always sought to mark their influence on the map. And Trump is a master of branding, known for slapping his name on buildings that he didn't build or own. Is there some psychological edge gained by renaming the Gulf of Mexico just as Trump is about to embark on a campaign of trade and immigration policies that casts Mexico as an antagonist to American greatness? Perhaps, but it would be better for everyone involved to avoid such a conflict.
The most important thing in any name is not what some official institution or a collection of old maps says. "A rose by any other name," and so on. Language is ever-evolving in ways that go beyond what any government can control.
If most people start calling the body of water between Texas and Cuba "the Gulf of America," then that'll be what it is. Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R–Ga.) have already adopted the new nomenclature. What Google and Apple decide to label that body of water probably means more than anything else.
If, as is far more likely, yesterday's executive order ends up being widely ignored and quickly forgotten (and perhaps reversed by some future administration, as executive orders tend to be), then the Gulf of Mexico will remain "the Gulf of Mexico."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Well, if Obama can name Mount McKinley into Denali, then they can just redesignate how it shows up on maps.
But some name changes will never take, like Twitter is still Twitter despite Elon's best efforts.
It's always OK when leftists rename streets and military bases and destroy historical monuments they don't approve of because they're better than all the rest of us, and it's always bad when conservatives rename something because they're deplorable humans. See how easy this is? I hope I was able to help.
It is true that leftists do not approve of those who waged war against the US. The question is why do you?
Perhaps because they waged war against a government that exceeded its constitutional limitations.
[There were other ways to deal with disaffected States and to end slavery without a cost of 650,000 lives]; as far erasing history, maybe reading a book or two by Orwell would be helpful.
It is true that leftists do not approve of those who waged war against the US.
Everyone knows only leftists are approved to wage war against the US--for democracy, of course.
Eat a bullet.
Leftists vote Democrat.
I am glad that the Democrats have never waged war against the US.
LBJ tried to rename Cape Canaveral as Cape Kennedy, but it didn't stick.
Sooo you're saying it should be the "Gulf of X"?
In the near future president Musk will rename the fourth planet from the sun Planet x.
"Gulf of MexicX"
The Gulf of America, (formerly the Gulf of Mexico)
is how reason will do it.
It’s comical to me that with all Trump has to face, THIS is what he does on the first day? Further picking a fight with a critical ally? The guy is a moron.
you think that is all he did that day? I wonder who the moron really is....
For a discussion about renaming the Gulf of Mexico his take is even more idiotically ethnocentric. You do know that the Japanese don't call themselves the Japanese, right? That, outside the N. America, Thousand Island dressing is sometimes called 'America Sauce' not because of some decree or patriotic branding, but because nobody outside N. America and even really the N. Atlantic region knows that the Thousand Islands reference is to the St. Lawrence river (or necessarily where that river even is). France declares champagne to be sparkling wine grown only in the Champagne region of France, no one else gives a shit. Sales of sparkling wine increase.
The idea that this is picking a fight is stupid.
I thought that Gulf of the Americas has a nice sound to it and would probably be acceptable to all, but - to each their own
If, as is far more likely, yesterday's executive order ends up being widely ignored and quickly forgotten (and perhaps reversed by some future administration, as executive orders tend to be), then the Gulf of Mexico will remain "the Gulf of Mexico."
It's almost like you had the conclusion in mind and wrote the article backwards without the least bit of care as to the oxymoronic, "The President can technically
move the capital of Israel to Jerusalemrename a geographic feature by executive decree, but *I* can see that it won't effectively change anything, trust me."The overwhelming majority of people living on or within sight of the Gulf are American and overwhelmingly voted for Trump, dumbass.
I suppose, on the plus side, this article isn't as terrible as the one Stooksberry would've written.
Well, Mumbai and Bombay are really the same name, just as Beijing and Peking (and before that, Peiping) are actually the same name, just different transliterations of it. It does seem hard to see how the M in Mumbai and the first B in Bombay can represent the same sound, but supposedly they do. Should countries be able to control the transliteration of their native names? Probably. And the people of a city like Mumbai almost certainly should not have to share the pronunciation of their city's name with part of a bomber aircraft, from which destruction might one day rain down on their city.
So we voted him back into office [and trust me I am really glad it wasn't his opposition who won]; so I guess we have to take the good with the...unusual.
See above. It's not unusual or only unusual in it's conspicuousness, not its type. The US Gov't has been going through and renaming landmarks and regions (even ones they don't control) for any twice-removed, extinct-culture, contemporary micro-grievance they could find since Obama.
Understood; fair play [but much better when WE can be the "unfair" ones for a change!]. I do like me some schadenfreude
When I first heard him say he was going to do it I laughed because it was classic Trump but then I thought "can he really do this"? I know he can direct the Federal Government to name whatever in official documents but I had thought there was some international body that agreed on official names like this so that everyone knew what everyone was talking about. I was very surprised to read that was not so. This leaves us where we are, I guess in that Trump and call anything whatever he wants and direct the US to do it officially. The gulf would be better off being called "The Gulf of North America" shortened to "Gulf of America" since it is bordered by North and Central America.
The most important thing in any name is not what some official institution or a collection of old maps says. Spontaneous order tends to rule the day.
Can India rename Bombay back to Mumbai? Or was it just a bunch of hip-swiveling glibertarians who did it via blockchain?
Well the leftists have spent the last decade renaming rivers and mountains and army bases and tearing down statues and monuments so shitting on history is apparently cool.
But that's (D)ifferent.
Makes me laugh that Democrats spent years renaming geographical features to satisfy their woke fetish but the minute Trump does it it is somehow an outrage. He could have officially named it "Gulf of Trump" or "The Great Trump Lake".
Is "America" necessarily synonymous with the United States? The continent of North America includes a lot of countries, including that Mexican one. But I guess "Gulf of the United States of America" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue.
At the time of Francis Drake, there were 3 names used for the New World. There was Brazil, which is much the same as it is today. Peru, the rest of South America, and Mexico, what we call today North America.
Get with the program Mister!
NO. "Gulf of America" isn't exclusive of Mexico--since Mexico is also part of North America.
What about "Gulf of Trump"?
How about "Lagonian Sea"? (translates into Spanish as "Mar Alago"-- sort of)
That's my thought. The renaming of the gulf seems silly to me, but "Gulf of America" actually is a more sensible name.
Since there is a country of Mexico but a continent of North America, referring to the gulf as the Gulf of America is more fitting I think and makes more sense.
I still call them freedom fries and you can't stop me.
Ha!
You can do anything you want with your own fries buddy. Just think twice about what you do with them afterwards.
The Japanese lobbied the English speaking world to rename Corea to be spelled with a K. That way the indignity of a shithole country such as Korea appearing before Japan in alphabetical order would be avoided. Yes, Kyrgyzstan, Kiribati and Kenya where K is used before 'y,' 'I' or 'e,' but Canada, Columbia, and Cuba. By established English usage, Korea should be Corea, as it is in Spanish and other languages who refused to comply with Japanese demands.
And speaking of Mexico, how long will it take Trump to realize there is an entire state begging to be renamed New America?
It will be named "Trumpica"! Also, give Trump a few weeks or months, and He will change His Mind, and was-Gulf-of-Mexico, then-was-Gulf-of-America, will become Gulf of Trump!
(I will grant that Trump is doing His Worst towards making the gulf between the USA and Mexico MUCH bigger!)
The state where the governor unilaterally violates the 2nd Amendment?
Pass. I say give them to Mexico.
" I say give them to Mexico."
Mexico Mexico?
36 trillion in the hole and climbing should be the priority. Until that's under control don't spend a nickle on one new woke/conservative sign or map change.
Fuck you cut spending.
Lighten up, Francis.
Here in Phoenix, Squaw Peak got renamed to Piestewa Peak. This was done because modern lefties invented a slur out of the word "squaw" even though it isn't one.
The word in Algonquin means "woman" which is the language from which it is derived. Sometime in the 1970s, some lefty decided that it was _really_ from a suffix at the end of a word in the Mohawk language which meant "vagina." Needless to say from that moment on in academia, that was the preferred etymology for the word and it quickly became a slur and needed to be excised from every place in the country where it was used. That this is interpretation is clearly wrong is irrelevant, political points were there to be scored.
This is to say: it's (D)ifferent when the people we like do it.
How did an Algonquin end up in Arizona? I thought the Great Lakes were there hunting grounds.
"Squaw" got into the English language and spread all over the USA, and probably more, "organically" (no artificial chemicals were used! Why can't socialists accept "organic" language changes anyway?) The Algonquin didn't do this shit (or any mandated "engineered language changes") by military conquest! That has fallen to academia and the feds, more recently...
https://fox11online.com/news/local/feds-remove-squaw-from-names-of-eight-northeast-wisconsin-locations-lake-creek-island-derogatory-department-of-interior-outagamie-county-door-oconto-marinette-menominee-waushara
Feds remove 'squaw' from names of eight Northeast Wisconsin locations
I read a few decades ago by now, some disgruntled local politician, when told "Squaw Lake" won't cut it any more, suggested that the new name should be "Politically Correct Lake".
https://www.fark.com/comments/11049943/In-1991-state-of-Texas-voted-to-rename-any-town-geographical-feature-with-word-negro-in-its-name-for-a-prominent-African-American-instead-Almost-30-years-later-that-hasnt-happened-Why-Because-federal-government-wont-let-them
"Montenegro" (the nation) MUST be changed to "MonteFamousBlackPerson"!!! MontePython won't do, sorry... Not NEARLY black enough!!!
Can we rename Arnold Schwarzenegger too while we're at it?
We need to not be so NIGGARDLY when throwing about the name changes, and coerced language changes, left and right! When we (collectively) decide to be GENEROUS with real or threatened Government Almighty violence, we need to be GENEROUS!!! There's PLENTY of coercion to go around, now, ladies and germs!
...it was _really_ from a suffix at the end of a word in the Mohawk language which meant "vagina."
Pussy Peak has a nice ring to it. Missed opportunity if you ask me.
How do you say "lady dick" in Algonquin?
So much for American Exceptionalism! (Sarcasm).
Why did Constantinople get the works?
It's no ones business but the Turks.
What Trump is doing is extremely frivolous and silly.
That being said, I would take this article more seriously if this argument was ever deployed in response to the Progs changing place names for politically correct reasons.
The progs were changing internal US place names. It takes a higher degree of pushiness to change names used by foreigners, though it can be done. For example, Iranians and Arabs argue over the name of a certain Gulf that carries a lot of oil exports.
Why not just call it, "The Carribean Sea?"
Oh, wait.
That makes sense.
What was I thinking?
Ok Mr. Jaybird. Sometimes you nail it!
I'ma call it the Gulf of Boehm until you stop whining.
If Vance becomes President after 2028, he'll probably rename it, "The Gulf of Trump".
I grew up outside of DC, a huge of fan of a football team whose name can't be uttered on university campuses everywhere for fear of expulsion. And "The Commanders" is the dumbest name evar. I can't even root for the team anymore--even in the NFL championship. It just feels like the NFL is shitting on my childhood memories. Would it be too much to hope that when the wokeness faucet is turned off for a while, maybe they could change the name again?
I can think of so many times that things have been renamed something stupid in the name of wokeness. Denali and the Gulf of Mexico are the least of them.
It's not just 'woke.' Sometimes renaming is in the interest of accuracy. Tidal wave -> Tsunami, Global warming -> Climate change, Assault rifle -> Semi automatic.
Assault rifle just means "Scary looking gun". Literally nothing more.
Handguns are semi-automatic. Nothing rifle-esque about 'em.
Semi automatic rifle is the correct name.
All of my guns are full-semi-automatic weapons.
I almost peed myself laughing when that asshat came out with "fully semi automatic". People should not make laws about things they don't understand.
"Owning automatic machine guns is illegal" is another knee slapper. No, it is not illegal.
I grew up and am still in the range of DC fans. Most people still call them the Skins and haven't dropped HTTR. The name changes have been dumb and basically nobody likes it.
If one looks at which EOs Reason is focusing on and which ones they are ignoring, one would infer Reason has a left leaning bias. Not a libertarian one.
"infer Reason has a left leaning bias"
It won't harm you. In fact, exposure to a diversity of thought and opinion should do you good.
No, I have been informed that muting is the answer.
Don't underestimate the Flag Comment.
One would, wouldn't they?
Mexico is a valley, the old home of the Toltecs and the Aztecs. The only body of water of significance is (was) Lake Texcoco. The Gulf of America is hundreds of miles away.
I would rather Trump ban federal agencies from renaming US domestic features, because the old names make somebody sad (and the new names help progressives with virtue signaling).
It is one of the Four Olds.
I can't believe anyone cares about this enough to make hay - or write whiny articles - about it. Like, do you have some personal anathema to it being called the Gulf of America, or is it just because Trump's the one who did it and it's a pro-America thing?
What Google and Apple decide to label that body of water probably means more than anything else.
Admittedly, I am absolutely going to accuse people who say "Gulf of Mexico" of deadnaming.
It's an act of violence, y'know. Or so leftists/marxists tell me.
So, I came into the City via the Battery Tunnel*, and took the West Side Highway** uptown to 48th, and then went crosstown to 6th Ave.***, where I parked and then walked a couple of blocks west to a restaurant in Hell's Kitchen****.
*Hugh L. Carey Tunnel
**Joe DiMaggio Highway
***Ave. of the Americas
****Clinton [the odd instance of the older name often supplanting the newer, mostly to make RE brokers happier].
"Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum publicly displayed a map made in 1607 that not only included the "Gulf of Mexico" label. Notably, it also marked much of the current United States as "Mexican America."
Don't know what map she is referring to but in 1607 it was not Mexico yet but Nueva Hispania or New Spain.
My favorite is when they decided to change the name of Patrick Henry Community College because of that whole icky slave thing. So it’s now called Patrick & Henry Community College, since it serves Patrick and Henry Counties… both of which were named in honor of Patrick Henry.
Istanbul was Constantinople
Now it's Istanbul, not Constantinople
Been a long time gone, Constantinople
Now it's Turkish delight on a moonlit night
Every gal in Constantinople
Lives in Istanbul, not Constantinople
So if you've a date in Constantinople
She'll be waiting in Istanbul
Even old New York was once New Amsterdam
Why they changed it I can't say
People just liked it better that way
Yeah. Gulf of the Caribbean, Caribbean Sea or Gulf of THE AMERICAS all make better sense.
CB
1619 Project = Okey Dokey
Gulf of America = Arrogance
Boy, the Left sure loves establishment and tradition, oh wait no they don't, what exactly is going on here?
BTW, I tried to name (not rename) the mountain peak THAT I OWN and it was subject to review by not only the USGS, but also by two separate native tribal councils(?). It took four years to be rejected - rejected by one of the tribal councils.
I guess my point is that bureaucracy is self-propagating and it is interesting to me that it takes presidential level power to cut through the fat.
+1
It's like the Drake meme-
1619 Project: Yup.
2 Men = 1 Man + 1 Woman: Thumbs up.
Gulf of America: Retraction.
It's almost like Democrats and Leftists didn't get the message that Americans don't abjectly hate Black People, Women, History, Geography, or America the way they hate them.
This name chang will completely change immigration problems
Right now, all ships and boats coming into every Gulf port are crossing a border from Mexico into the US. Once the name changes, the border will get shorter as well so the number of immigrants will drop.
It's like a 4D chess move
Dresden -> Karl Marx Stadt
Saigon -> Ho Chi Min City
Gulf of Mexico -> Gulf of America
Rather tiring, isn't it?