Hospital Staff Failed To Treat Her Miscarriage, Then Accused Her of a Crime
A new lawsuit alleges that, after failing to treat a placental abruption, medical staff conspired to have Brittany Watts arrested for her miscarriage.

When Brittany Watts began bleeding at 21 weeks pregnant, she went to her local hospital seeking help. Instead, she was repeatedly denied treatment. When she miscarried at home, hospital staff accused Watts of deliberately harming her fetus, and Watts was eventually arrested and charged with a felony.
While a grand jury later declined to indict Watts, she filed a lawsuit earlier this month, accusing hospital employees of fabricating evidence that she had harmed her baby and failing to properly treat her miscarriage symptoms.
On September 19, 2023, Watts went to St. Joseph Warren Hospital in Warren, Ohio, after she had begun experiencing pain and bleeding. Doctors told her she had experienced a placental abruption, an extremely dangerous condition in which the placenta separates from the wall of the uterus before birth. But instead of receiving treatment, Watts waited for eight hours without care or information about her condition.
According to Watts' lawsuit, she eventually went home and rapidly declined by the following morning. When she returned to the hospital, she was told that her water had broken, her cervix was dilated, and an infection had started. Her doctor allegedly told her that she risked "hemorrhaging, sepsis, and death" unless her fetus was removed.
Once again, instead of inducing labor or performing a dilation and evacuation (D&E) procedure, doctors left Watts to languish without treatment—leaving her untreated for more than 10 hours. Watts once again returned home.
According to her lawsuit, Watts eventually miscarried in her toilet at home on September 22. The baby had already died, and Watts claims she didn't realize she had passed her fetus because it was obscured by a considerable volume of tissue, blood, and clots.
"Confronted with this bloody mess, Ms. Watts did what was reasonable: she flushed the toilet. The toilet began overflowing," the suit states. "Ms. Watts did her best to clear the toilet, removing some of the bloody mess with a bucket."
Watts yet again returned to the hospital seeking care. This time, instead of merely ignoring her needs for care, Watts found herself falsely accused of committing a crime. According to the suit, a nurse called the police and "falsely told them that Ms. Watts had given birth at home, did not want the baby and so did not look to see if it were alive, and had come to the hospital without the baby." The suit adds that the nurse "falsely suggested the baby could be alive and that Ms. Watts may have done something wrong or illegal."
As Watts awaited treatment, a nurse and a police detective, "conspired to interrogate Ms. Watts and accuse her of harming the fetus," the suit claims. "They worked together to fabricate evidence to falsely implicate Ms. Watts in criminal conduct. They knowingly created reports and hospital notes that contained blatantly false information. As a result, Ms. Watts was arrested and charged with a felony: abuse of a corpse. She faced a year in prison for simply having a miscarriage at home."
The suit further claims that the police detective "later provided flatly false information in police reports, including that Ms. Watts had seen and touched the fetus, writing that she told him she had 'taken the fetus out of the toilet and placed it in a black bucket.'"
While Watts was later cleared of wrongdoing, her case is still a terrifying example of alleged medical malpractice and police abuse.
"It's a shocking case," Julia Rickert, Watts' Attorney, told WFMJ, a local news station. "She was in the hospital for several days following the miscarriage, a hospital stay that could've been avoided if she had gotten proper care when she was at the hospital pre-miscarriage,"
"Ms.Watts was in a medical crisis, an emotional crisis and the people who should have been looking out for her, more than anyone else, the medical professionals, and police officers instead persecuted her," Ricket added.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
iF iT sAvEs OnE LiFe...
May have missed it, but did Emma try to find out the other side's story? Something seems fishy.
There is no 'other side' in propaganda; only in journalism.
I expect that the hospital wanted to cover up their lack of care during the first two visits, and went on the offensive. Probably SOP.
It sounds like the young lady admits to just leaving the hospital of her own volition, twice. At least, from the little bit that Emma cares to write about.
To be fair, if I was left waiting for 8 hours and then 10 hours, respectively, without receiving treatment or information, I might walk out too. But then I'd potentially go to a different hospital if I was able.
I had a heart scare from a bad case of heartburn and wasn't left sitting somewhere without information for any length of time. They did a full panel and got an x-ray and I was out inside of an hour.
It does make me wonder about this story. If this was Canada, I wouldn't be surprised if someone was left waiting so long they gave up. It's not normal for a hospital in the US to leave patients who are actively bleeding alone for hours on end. It's possible her attorneys are exaggerating here, though you'd think they would have some records to back it up.
If the triage staff think that your case is not urgent, you can easily sit waiting in a US hospital for 12 or even 24 hours. Your heart scare (even though it only turned out to be heartburn) will easily bump you up the line, yes, even over someone who is actively (but not arterially) bleeding.
She wasn't left for 8 and then 10 hours untreated. She was left for 8 to 10 hours without being given the illegal treatment she demanded. Not to refuse your point about triage, but nowhere does the article say anything about triage and it specifically notes and implies at several points (via diagnoses) that she had sonograms and other inspections and monitoring performed.
Several years ago I cut my leg. I went to the ER. I had a bandage on the cut and was sitting in the Waiting Room when a woman fainted from looking at the blood on my shoe. I was in, got stitches and out of there in 20 minutes, with the Physician's Assistant cracking up as he wrapped my leg.
Yeah, loss of consciousness is generally a big booster to patient priority. Warranted or not.
It sounds like the young lady admits to just leaving the hospital of her own volition, twice. At least, from the little bit that Emma cares to write about.
IME, this is almost certainly explicitly as well. Even EMTs are explicit "I need you to confirm that you're refusing treatment."
So what does that have to do with anything? Her lawsuit isn't against the hospital for a lack of care, it is for conspiring to make a criminal issue out of the incident.
Assuming her story is the whole truth, sure. I don't believe it is though. And most reasonable people understand that people are usually the hero of their own story.
Not to mention, we're talking about her being the victim of Emma's telling of her attorney's version of her story.
If I walk into a police station fearing for my life, leave twice, and the person I claimed to be fearing turns up dead in the plumbing of my house, an investigation should be expected.
If one of my kids suddenly stopped going to school and all their other activities... on a certain level, this forces rational humans to void the object permanence skills they developed before they could talk playing peek-a-boo.
Unless hospitals are suddenly capable of their own investigation and litigation, they did the correct thing.
Again the whole thing stems from a false beyond reason assumption/neurotic assertion that fetuses aren't just property, they are private pieces of the women carrying them. If you see a woman aborting a fetus, you shouldn't call for help or notify anyone the way you wouldn't if they were chopping off their own hand or an ear or a breast. Their body, their choice.
She left a hospital bed, not the ER waiting room, twice. Waiting more than 12 hours for an unscheduled surgical procedure that isn't to immediately save your life is not uncommon, especially if the hospital is busy.
This site, and several writers including Emma, have a terrible record of only showing the good parts of one side and utterly ignoring the bad parts and the other side altogether. Some sound incredibly plausible, until someone like AT comes around and digs a little deeper. Unfortunately, AT does the same in reverse sometimes.
This one sounds like a complete travesty. But the track record makes me think something's fishy too.
Who is AT?
Something seems fishy.
Not fishy, wholly contrived.
"The baby had already died" = "Bullets struck the suspect".
Who says the baby already died? The woman who asked for an abortion when it was still alive and when the hospital refused she left... twice?
As usual, some people read "the baby died" and declare that to be a non-issue, even invoking the non-sequitur "My body, my choice." in refute of the dead body lying in the toilet.
Again, if you partake of the hyper-religious insanity of regarding the fetus as an actual life, not even a human with rights... just alive, the omissions of the story make perfect sense. She wasn't left untreated, they actually even performed diagnostics. She was denied the treatment she believes she is entitled to.
This is the same B.S. as the lesbian that Obama celebrated who claimed the Hospital discriminated against her. They lost the case. The Hospital had clear anti-discrimination policies in place and didn't violate them, but one social activist sold them the story that it was Florida and "Don't Say Gay."
Doesn’t sound like she was getting any other treatment.
Oh, FFS... "Bake The Gay Wedding Pizza Force Nuns To Top It With Dead Fetus Parts!" - Reason Magazine
https://www.mercy.net/about/
I mean this kind of shows how incompatible Catholic dogma is with sound medical treatment. They literally believe if the pregnancy threatens the life of the mother the mother should just be allowed to die. A sick religion.
Hmm, as a life-long Catholic and taking a few minutes of Google searching and reading the websites of various Catholic dioceses discussing that question, it would seem you are 100% wrong.
Perhaps you can enlighten further?
I'm curious whether those same symptoms indicate usage of an abortion pill. ENB is all about those being otc regardless of possible complications.
One-sided stories like this inspire no faith in the author's points.
The facts in this article come from the woman‘s civil complaint. And the typical civil complaint falls somewhere between “a work of fiction based loosely on a true story“ and “a work of fantasy that makes the Harry Potter novels read like nonfiction.“
The sent the woman home with a life-threatening condition. Malpractice --- what other side is there.
Disclaimer: I learned medical ethics from my father, who was a doctor.
No, they didn't "send the woman home" - she LEFT. Both times.
Your father may have been a doctor, but you clearly didn't learn the difference between actively sending someone home, and the person walking out on their own.
She left after being untreated for many hours. What was she supposed to have done when all evidence indicated they were not going to treat her?
Call her friends and relatives. Call the TV stations. Call the newspaper. Call news radio stations. Make a stink! Right there from the ED waiting room. She just wandered off without putting up a fight.
Disclaimer: I learned medical ethics from my father, who was a doctor.
Implied Disclaimers: Intelligence isn't strictly hereditary and his father wasn't Michael Crichton, M.D..
There's three sides to every story. Why is it always only 1 side Emma presents?
There's three sides to every story.
At least 2 anyway.
1) Ms Watts' side
2) The hospital's side
3) The truth
We may never know the full truth, but a so-called journalist should at least try to uncover it.
LOL. OK, good to know that we, as a society, have 100.00% given up on black fathers as even being a thing.
While I don’t agree with all the pro life nutjobs in the comments you do have a point that she doesn’t even say she tried to reach the hospital for comment. That being said, it’s standard practice to not speak to the press when you are being sued so they may not have been able to give their side.
"She's killing un-alive humans!!!", Pro-Life religious wack-jobs who can't mind their own F'En business.
can I just be a pro-life hippie who loves everyone?
The 'love' in using 'Guns' to dictate a persons body against their own will?
I don't use guns to love everyone.
Based on the information in this article, which comes only from Ms. Watts' perspective, we don't even know if abortion or desire for an abortion was a factor at all.
This story reeks of selective editing.
TL:DR
She walked in having a serious complication.
She made the mistake of saying the word "Abortion" in Ohio.
A doctor examined her and agreed .
Risk Management stuck its nose into things and panicked about Ohio's abortion laws and made everything go to hell after that.
Full story with better details here:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/brittany-watts-the-ohio-woman-charged-with-a-felony-after-a-miscarriage-talks-shock-of-her-arrest/
"Summary of the Article: Brittany Watts, Ohio Woman Charged with Felony After Miscarriage
The CBS News article details the experience of Brittany Watts, a 34-year-old woman from Warren, Ohio, who was charged with a felony after experiencing a miscarriage at home. The events surrounding her case highlight the intersection of medical ethics, the criminal justice system, and abortion laws in Ohio."
Summary of the Article
She made the mistake of saying the word "Abortion" in Ohio.
"Don't Say
GayAbortion" - Liberty_BelleThanks for providing the link where it lays out all the selective editing and falsehoods above:
Yeah, leaving AMA kind of absolves the hospital of liability, and certainly grants the medical staff plausible cause to suspect her of foul play in the death of the fetus (and who diagnosed the fetus as deceased?). Furthermore, there are several degrees of placenta abruptio, and at 21 weeks, the milder forms are generally treated by strict bedrest and close monitoring.
In more severe cases, an emergency C-section might be attempted if the fetus is considered viable. If not, again, the standard is bed rest, supportive care and monitoring and try to keep the fetus alive until viability. Especially at 21 weeks, every 24 hours they can prolong the pregnancy improves the fetus chance of surviving exponentially.
I will note, before anyone suggests it, at 21 weeks, a severe placental abruptio that threatens the mother's life is never treated by an abortion or a D&C, as the act of contracting necessary to expel the placenta risks the mother bleeding out. Emergency C-section is always indicated in that case.
Also, I would note, that entering a note late, as long as it's clearly labeled as a late entry, is both common practice and legal. Quite often, especially in an ER, you have limited time to chart.
Another consideration, she was 21 6 days. Medically induced abortions take on average 72 hours the law makes abortions illegal at 22 weeks, do the math. Additionally, two of the biggest complications from medically induced abortions are placenta abruptio and retained placenta. One of the biggest risk factors for retained placenta? You guessed it, placenta abruptio. Thus, very few on/gyn are going to perform a medically induced abortion on a woman that already is presenting with a placenta abruptio.
Another note: typically the practice is to allow the mother to try and pass the fetus naturally before resorting to a D&C in the case of fetal death. It's a lot easier on the body.
Or the whole thing is just a deliberate set-up and smear by pro-abortion individuals and groups because what is one woman's life when balanced against thousands of murders a year? They sure didn't have a problem with dead women when it came to Kermit Gosnell if it kept the slaughterhouses open.
If you can't find the sensational story to tug at the heartstrings, you have to make the sensational story yourself.
>>A new lawsuit alleges that, after failing to treat a placental abruption, medical staff conspired to have Brittany Watts arrested for her miscarriage.
ditch the disruptive comma.
Slightly different topic:
What is your stance on the Oxford comma?
I don't use it and when my assistant who cannot spell does I delete it lol
edit: and posting here I forego most punctuation
I love the Oxford comma. I find it makes reading faster. Is a subordinate clause upcoming, or is it the end of a series?
fair enough. let's eat grandma.
lol
similar to that book, "Eats, Shoots and Leaves."
>>According to Watts' lawsuit, she eventually went home and rapidly declined by the following morning.
eventually went home is the entire matter ... I see the who what where and when you may have missed the why here.
The ProPublica story just before the election turned out to be ex post facto narrative creation: the woman who went home under such circumstances in Texas and later died was such a scandal when it happens that her name (an unusual one) yielded 0 hits on every search engine until the ProPublica article.
The article was made by the author going through a database of people and finding the right combination of someone who went home and died, grabbed her name and then wrote a story about what could have happened in such a circumstance, and how the doctors might have acted differently if the laws were different. Less than a week before the election.
Journalist 1: I need you to find me a *checks notes* pregnant ten year old...
Journalist 2: *interrupting* ten year old's can't get pregnant.
Journalist 1: *waving hand, side to side dismissively* That's... not the point... or entirely true-- there are rare conditions where a 10 yr old can get pregnant. *Googles* Yeah, it's called.. 'promiscuous puberty". Rare... yes, but that's not the point, listen to me. *leans over desk with intensity* I need you to find a "pregnant" *makes air quotes with fingers* 10 yr old who was the victim of a rape, and the rapist needs to be someone with no background in the country...
Journalist 2: So an immigrant?
Journalist 1: *narrows eyes*
Journalist 2: Ohhhh, an illegal immigrant...
Journalist 1: You'll go far... so, again, I need you to find a "pregnant" 10 year old who was raped by ... someone with no google-able history in the country and had to get an emergency abortion at *pulls out card from pocket* this clinic.
Journalist 2: But what if...
Journalist 1: No, it has to be this clinic...
Journalist 2: Why this clinic, this is in Indiana?
Journalist 1: Trust me, this has all been arranged. The clinic staff will be waiting for you, just call the # on the card.
*Journalist 2 starts to get up*
Journalist 1: Remember, I need this by no later than 4:30 pm, tomorrow.
Journalist 2: When do you publish?
Journalist 1: I don't, I call the White House.
Fucking retards:
You wake up in the morning and find yourself back to back in bed with an unconscious violinist. A famous unconscious violinist. He has been found to have a fatal kidney ailment, and the Society of Music Lovers has canvassed all the available medical records and found that you alone have the right blood type to help. They
have therefore kidnapped you, andwith your consent last night plugged the violinist's circulatory system into yours, so that your kidneys can be used to extract poisons from his blood as well as your own. [If he is unplugged from you now, he will die; but] in nine months he will have recovered from his ailment, and can safely be unplugged from you.You discover some of the cables to be leaking. So you then go to the Music Lover's Hospital and demand that they kill and detach him. They admit you, test him and conclude that he will die shortly, that they'll care for you until he dies and do everything they can to prevent your death, but that they can't kill him, it's the law. You refuse their treatment and leave. The next day, when things get worse, you go *back* to the same Music Lover's Hospital where they tell you the exact same thing. That night, allegedly, the violinist dies and you flush him down the toilet. When the toilet gets clogged, for some unknown reason, you go *back again* to the same Music Lover's hospital where you previously insisted, twice, that they kill the violinist. When someone there suspects that you may have killed the violinist and flushed his body down the toilet. You accuse them of... uh... conspiracy... to... uh... provide you care... and... uh... obey the law... and... uh... refusing to kill a living violinist.
It's a shame the fetus is the one that got flushed.
With the decline of the insane, disinformative Left, Emma and Reason have committed to stepping up:
So, even in the retelling, of the classic tale of the violinist above *I'm* still being generous to Watts:
They admit you, test him and conclude that he will die shortly, that they'll care for you until he dies and do everything they can to prevent your death, including detaching him from you but they can't do it upon your specific and repeated request to kill him, it's the law.
This whole story feels like the kind of journalism that's done by researching tweets.
After reading the CBSNews story posted by Belle above, I think the worst people in this mess appear to be the "ethics committee" who fucked up Ms Watts' care. Her OBGYN and the doctor at the hospital had the same diagnosis, and that should have been the start of treatment, period. The "ethics committee" are the ones who should be investigated for potentially using Ms Watts as a way to challenge Ohio's abortion law.
Per the CBSNews story posted above, the OBGYN didn't have to consult the ethics committee. Per the CBSNews Story above, the ethics committee effectively said "It's OK if the doctor chooses to end someone's life, especially to save hers, but they can't commit a murder upon request." which was the case at any point, 21 weeks and 6 days or 22 weeks and 1 day (not to mention, pretty sound ethical advice, "Unplug them so their suffering can end." is not the same as "Unplug them so I can get my inheritance already.")
This, once again, sounds like doctors, OBGYNs, and even potentially activist women complicating things and then insisting that they be accommodated for doing so. Specifically pushing hard cases specifically to craft bad law.
She and her case should be tossed out of civil court on her face. There was once upon a time when this sort of one-sided reporting on a civil suit was generally considered to be unethical.
If Risk Management (or Ethics Committee or whatever hospitals call the same ilk of people) never got involved , Watts would have walked in, the Doctor agreed she had a life threatening situation and would have done the induction immediately and this whole debacle would have ended with the practice of good medicine by a trained and knowledgeable professional.
Nothing good happens once the busy bodies, bean counters, and appeasers get involved.
You didn't read your own story. Risk Management didn't get involved. Your "trained and knowledgeable professional" invoked them, invoked them when they didn't have to by law, and failed to proceed after the Risk Management had green lit things before the law applied.
Nothing good happens once the busy beans, body counters, and appeasers get involved.
FIFY. Fully agreed that nothing good happens once people start counting bodies and appeasing the people stacking them up.
As usual, this lawsuit actually makes healthcare and even reproductive/"reproductive" care worse for women going forward. But, as usual, it's not about the women or the fetuses or the healthcare workers, it's about punishing wrong thinkers.
Induction for a placenta abruptio? Hmmm, not usually the treatment of choice, as the risk of dangerous bleeding drastically increases with an induction. Now in my wife's case, the placenta abruptio was discovered during her induction, and at that point the doctor ordered them to prep for an emergency C-section, she managed to deliver vaginally while they were prepping the OR. We also had two ob/gyn attendings, an ob/gyn resident, a NICU attending and a neonatal cardiologist (for an unrelated issue) in the room, plus the anesthesiologist and four nurses.
Rule#1: Don't seek help for pregnancy complications at a Catholic Hospital in Ohio.
...and then don't just leave the ER. Once you walk out on your own accord, they're no longer responsible for you.
According to Watts' lawsuit, she eventually went home
Watts once again returned home.
Wait, before I even deep dive this... so she went for medical attention, was admitted, got tired of waiting, and left of her own volition? Twice?
They must know that's the weak link in their case, hence the only real COA against the hospital. An "EMTALA violation," which is laughable on its face. (And not just because I personally think, as some of you know, that EMTALA is one of the most unconstitutional laws ever written and responsible for hundreds of billions in Medicare debt/abuse.)
I love this line: 124. Although induction or a D&E procedure were medically necessary, Defendant ST. JOSEPH WARREN HOSPITAL failed to provide stabilizing treatment to Ms. Watts within the meaning of EMTALA and then constructively released her.
LMAO, WHAT????
That count will be dismissed on MSJ immediately following Watts' deposition. Nobody made her leave. Nobody asked her to leave. They even probably told her to stay - and she didn't. Hospital/ER wait times can be rough sometimes (thanks EMTALA!), but she wasn't in a state of life-threatening condition. Like, she wasn't bleeding out or anything there in the waiting room. She was "at risk of" - but not in immediate danger. She was told that she had a risky condition, and she left. I bet she didn't even sign out AMA. She likely just got up and left.
Then she went back, predictably worsened, but still only in an "at risk" condition. And then left again. "She was confused, tired, scared, frustrated, and sad because she had not been given the care she was told she needed." YET. She left before she COULD be given it. Which.... is a dumb thing to do. Just saying.
Despite knowing that Ms. Watts would miscarry, neither Defendant KHAVARI nor any of Ms. Watts’s other medical providers told her how to manage her impending miscarriage at home.
Well why would they? Why would they expect her to leave??
OK, so let's stop and clarify a few things as we read further through this complaint. (It's really more for my sake than yours as I unpack this.)
Carney = Cop.
Khavari = Hospital OBGYN
Moschell and Carrino = Hospital staff (candystripers, probably)
So, she miscarries on the toilet, baby gets stuck in the p-trap, toilet overflows, she tries to clean up, and goes to the hospital.
We don't know who said what to who, in particular and especially what Watts said to the candystripers, but it appears that there was a weird little game of Telephone happening here. A traumatized Watts presented to the hospital having miscarried and bleeding, and at some point talked to Carrino and Moschell. As Watts explained what happened, I'm sure words like "baby" (likely not "fetus," as by her own admission this is a pregnancy she wanted, and was traumatized to lose) and "bucket" and "toilet" and so forth were mentioned. Whether "live" or "not moving" or whatever else were said is going to be She Said/They Said.
Moschell predictably sent this to in-house counsel ("the hospital’s risk management department"). They have to do this.
We don't know what in-house told her, but she called 5-0 later that day. I'm inclined to believe that's on their advice.
The two jointly interrogated Ms. Watts for nearly an hour. While they told her she was free to leave, she was in no condition to do so, as both knew.
So, based on what Watts told Moschell, which very possibly Moschell misinterpreted, she called the cops. Carney arrived and an "interrogation" ensued. Whether or not it was an interrogation or not is unclear. Was she under arrest? Doubtful. Was she detained? Not by the cops. Was she free to leave? Technically yes, but practically no.
But did she have to answer any questions? Nope. If she did, that was of her own volition. Know your rights, people.
64. Based on the totality of these circumstances, Ms. Watts had no real choice but to talk with CARNEY and MOSCHELL about what had happened earlier that day.
lol. What?
Defendants CARNEY and MOSCHELL set out to present a version of events in which Ms. Watts had given birth to a baby she thought may be alive and had then abused it.
Yea, but there's no indication that there was anything short of sincere belief there. Again, we'll never know without knowing what Watts said to them when she was admitted the third time after absconding twice prior.
So, let's look at the COAs. The bulk of them are against the cop and the stripers, apparently on some half-baked notion that they're all a bunch of mustache-twirling villains who, for no reason at all, concocted a plan to randomly persecute this woman. When the reality is that Watts likely said things that raised a few red flags, which the stripers were legally obligated to report, and which needed to be immediately addressed on the arguably very real possibility that there was an abandoned preemie newborn in a bucket somewhere. Again, we don't know exactly who said what - but this was apparently the inference that was made. Reasonable, unreasonable - YMMV. (I'm inclined to give the benefit of the doubt to life, so if four cruisers show up to kick in her door and look for a struggling preemie newborn in her bathroom, I don't really have a problem with it.)
They're going for the OBGYN apparently because they think triage and patient priority is a tort (which is stupid, they'll lose). Watts made a very dumb decision leaving the hospital twice. Khavari will testify, "When I went to perform the necessary treatment, which would have been in a medically timely fashion, she was gone."
As mentioned, the EMTALA claim is ludicrous.
The rest is spaghetti on the wall in hopes that the central torts stick.
Emma, do yourself a favor. Run all your future articles by me before you post them. I will invariably stop you from making yourself look like an idiot. (Admittedly, that might also make you unemployed, but maybe that's for the best.)
I will invariably stop you from making yourself look like an idiot. (Admittedly, that might also make you unemployed, but maybe that's for the best.)
No offense, I think you overestimate yourself. I've heard after-hours stories about Emma and plenty of writing from Emma to suggest that her naive idiocy isn't strictly professional.
I was trying to be kind, but then you had to go and kick her right in the vag didn't you.
Yea, she's retarded. We all know.
YOu look weird trying to build a story out of 3 concatenated oddities.
1 in 4 or 5 are miscarriages.
Refusal to treat (which happened galore during COVID and you were silent as a tomb)
And staff conspiring with police to have her arrested.
And we are supposed to appraise all this both medically and legally.
C'mon, maybe you should work in the recipe section
She's a millennial. She doesn't have even a single domestic skill, least of all the ability to cook for herself.