Meet Pierre Poilievre, the Front-Runner To Be Canada's Next Prime Minister
He says he wants to "stop growing the money supply and start growing the stuff money buys."

Justin Trudeau announced his resignation as Canadian prime minister on Monday, ending his nine-year tenure amid cratering support from voters and his own Liberal Party. During a Monday speech, Trudeau said he plans to remain in office until the Liberal Party selects a new leader. Canada's next federal election must take place by October.
Pierre Poilievre, the leader of Canada's Conservative Party, is the current front-runner to replace Trudeau as prime minister. Throughout 2024, polls showed Poilievre and the Conservative Party routing Trudeau and the Liberal Party as economic discontent grew and political issues (including the deputy prime minister's surprise resignation last year) rocked the incumbent government.
In a video posted to X after Trudeau's resignation on Monday, Poilievre painted his Conservative Party as the "common sense" antidote to Canada's recent woes. "We'll cap spending, axe taxes, reward work, build homes, uphold family, stop crime, secure borders, rearm our forces, restore our freedom, and put Canada first," he explained, "to bring home Canada's promise."
Beyond bite-sized slogans, what policies would Poilievre bring to the table as Canada's prime minister?
First elected to Canada's Parliament in 2004, Poilievre served as a senior cabinet minister under former Prime Minister Stephen Harper. He garnered attention in 2022 due to his support for the Canadian truck drivers who took to Ottawa to protest Trudeau-era COVID-19 vaccine mandates. In the years since, the firebrand Conservative has frequently railed against Trudeau and his government. He argued in a recent interview with psychologist Jordan Peterson that Canadians are "sick and tired" of the "horrendous, utopian wokeism" that benefits "egotistical personalities on top" rather than "common people."
Variously described as "libertarian" and "populist," Poilievre supports cutting government spending and lowering taxes. "We will cap government spending with a dollar-for-dollar law that requires we find one dollar of savings for every new dollar of spending," he argued in a September speech in Canada's House of Commons. Poilievre has said his government would remove the federal sales tax on homes under $1 million. Last June, he came out against a proposed capital gains tax increase and promised to form a "tax reform task force" soon after forming a government if elected. He owns and uses bitcoin and promotes cryptocurrencies as a hedge against inflation.
Inflation is immoral, Poilievre told Peterson, because "nobody votes on it." Rather, "inflation is adopted secretly, and you blame the grocer because groceries are more expensive or your local gas station because gas is more [expensive]…when in fact it was actually the government that bid up all of those things with money printing, and you didn't even know about it."
"What we have to do is stop growing the money supply and start growing the stuff money buys," he continued. "Produce more energy, grow more food, build more homes. We have to unleash the free enterprise system."
Poilievre is a fierce critic of Canada's carbon tax, calling it "an existential threat to our economy and our way of life." He has said "he plans to speed up approvals to build oil refineries, liquefied natural gas plants, nuclear facilities and hydro power," reported Bloomberg last week.
During a 2022 roundtable, Poilievre argued that immigrants and Conservatives shared the same values—"hard work, family, freedom, tradition"—and that those values were needed "to build a future Conservative party." More recently, he has pushed for tougher border security and tighter restrictions on asylum seekers. A Conservative government, Poilievre suggested, would set immigration levels below the rate of homebuilding.
Of course, a major question is how the U.S. and Canada, both helmed by new leaders, will interact. If elected, Poilievre is likely to have some points of friction with President-elect Donald Trump. Trump has promised to impose steep tariffs on Canada after he returns to the White House. "Canada is ripping itself off" by selling oil and gas to the U.S. at "enormous discounts," Poilievre told Peterson. The U.S.-Canada relationship reached a new (and very strange) level recently when Trump suggested that he might use "economic force" to acquire America's northern neighbor.
"Canada will never be the 51st state," Poilievre posted to X on Tuesday. "We will put Canada First."
For all his liberty-friendly tendencies, certain aspects of Poilievre's plans—immigration restrictions and a proposed crackdown on crime, to name a few—might involve uncomfortable extensions of state power. Some may question his anti-establishment bona fides given that he is a career politician. Still, after Trudeau's nearly decade-long tenure, Poilievre offers some refreshing ideas—and he might just get the chance to put them into action.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I'm not hearing anything I dislike and sense Fiona got slippery with the quotes and context once it got to immigration and Trump.
Good for Canada if this guy is in charge.
What was slippery about it
On immigration she framed it as a preference for immigrants when he was likely describing a subset who can add to rather than detract from native success.
She highlights issues with Trump when it seems clear that both sides would have an interest in cooperation.
You are correct. The same view as Trump.
In an exclusive interview on True North’s Andrew Lawton Show, Poilievre rejected “systematic illegal immigration.”
“I support lawful immigration. People have to come in the right way. We can’t have systematic illegal immigration as the Liberals presided over with the Roxham Road, that they persisted for many many years and other forms of illegal entry,” Poilievre told Lawton in the interview, which premieres Monday at 1 p.m. ET.
“It causes chaos in the system and it also creates resentment among the people who actually followed the rules. When I’m prime minister, we’ll restore lawful immigration and we’ll make sure there are no perverse incentives for people to break the law to get in.”
https://tnc.news/2023/12/18/poilievre-rejects-incentives-illegal-immigration/
*eating apple*
Hello my fellow kids.
The commentariat already knows who he is.
Hell, I didn't. I don't really pay much attention to Canadian politics.
You're welcome.
He is basically Trump with a filter.
Sounds dangerous.
He will have to be convicted and imprisoned for an accounting error before he can destroy Canadian democracy.
Make Canada great again, eh.
And he's more consistent, and a lot closer to being libertarian than Trump.
I'd love it if we could have someone like him here. But I don't think his quiet, understated Canadianness would work here.
Yea, he's based af.
Hello my fellow kids:
That's one way to spin it, here's another take:
He thinks he can appease Trump. He may turn out to be the last Canadian PM.
Parody.
Make Parody Great Again.
Man, you should charge him rent for how easily he resides in your head.
I think a lot of people are just willfully ignorant about how Trump operates. It's not like he's an unknown at this point and no one's ever seen him say shit to rile people up.
Jesus Christ, dude, do you really think Trump is going to conquer Canada?
It's all part of Canada's plan to retake the 13 colonies, or however many there are these days. Welcome to south Canada boys or as we call it, "The sacred homeland of Treaty 12 Peoples"
I'm mostly cool with becoming the eleventh province with Governor Trump in charge. My only fear is that they'll start digging up church yards and forcing kids into curling leagues.
We need to give them the Fentanyl corridor. Add it to their fentanyl corridor in BC.
As long as we keep Greenland.
Of course, a major question is how the U.S. and Canada, both helmed by new leaders, will interact. If elected, Poilievre is likely to have some points of friction with President-elect Donald Trump. Trump has promised to impose steep tariffs on Canada after he returns to the White House. "Canada is ripping itself off" by selling oil and gas to the U.S. at "enormous discounts," Poilievre told Peterson.
I'm trying to decide if I'm going to post a 1000 word comment parsing this out for the commentariat, but I'm guessing many don't need a roadmap.
Intentionally bad interpretation and understanding of the world from a Reason writer. No surprise.
Pierre? Sounds French. MAGA types won’t trust him.
He's from Alberta. MAGA types will be just fine.
So you’re saying not to trust those from Quebec?
No.
No like No don’t trust them? Or no I didn’t say that?
This is why you stumble so much. You can’t be clear.
And you outright lied about my election prediction.
ML lies a lot. When he's not dragging the goalposts all over the field, he's dishonestly changing the argument.
"For all his liberty-friendly tendencies, certain aspects of Poilievre's plans—immigration restrictions and a proposed crackdown on crime, to name a few—might involve uncomfortable extensions of state power."
Canada used to have the world's most sanest and most sensible immigration policy. Canada had an almost perfect method of taking productive people from across the planet and integrating safely and quickly into Canadian society. It worked wonderfully, and the vast majority of Canadians were very much in favour of mass immigration.
And then Justin entered the stage, and he had a better way. Defund immigration services, and tell the world that if they can make it here he will give them free shit. A free house, free healthcare, free food, free clothes, free phones, free internet, and a monthly mad money allowance that was bigger than the average Canadian's paycheck.
So millions did, legally. 20 percent of the Canadian population in less than a decade. Nobody was prepared. Trudeau didn't invest a dime extra in healthcare, infrastructure, education or anything else needed to prepare for and accommodate massive population growth.
And then like everything else, he welched on his promises to the millions of new immigrants. He had gutted immigration they couldn't handle all the registrations and applications. So poor people who came with nothing, ended up 75 to a house and penniless, wishing that they could work three different jobs. But they don't have social insurance numbers and even if they did there's a million other applicants to scrub toilets at the 7Eleven.
Keep in mind that unlike in the US these are legal immigrants, not scofflaws.
So did Trudeau re-fund immigration services and work on the backlog?
No. Lol.
He had to give billions instead to journalists to keep them party loyal, and give addicts free hard drugs (meth, heroin, fentanyl... no, really) to kill themselves with (although he did save money by defunding treatment centres), and of course he needed to donate more money to the Ukrainian military than the Canadian Armed forces.
As for Poilievre's "a proposed crackdown on crime", Trudeau passed a couple of bills saying bail must always be set at the absolute minimum, and sentencing must always be the minimum, etc, kicking off the biggest crimewave outside of California.
Think California's theft epidemic but much worse. Particularly since Canada was an extreme high trust society 10 years ago. People didn't know what hit them.
All Poilievre's proposing is to bring back the laws to where they were 10 years ago.
Some might say that this is just the result of Toxic Empathy, but I think Trudeau's handlers have genuinely malevolent intentions towards Canadians.
Federal appeals court decides not to block the details of Trump crimes - but allows delay past inauguration.
Wow. Regal immunity for Donnie is in fact a reality now.
Merchan and Bragg should both be in jail for election interference, and you should get a kick to the teeth for bragging about fraudulent charges and Gestapo political lawfare.
How is this immunity? It's a delay not a dismissal, and they're clearly non-crimes in any case. You can't even construct a lie that survives examination of itself.
George Washington “Do not make me king. The US is not a monarchy “.
Fatass Donnie “Make me King or dictator. I want total power!”.
So, from another one of Poilievre's interviews:
So, the general gist of his comments that I'm getting here, is that the only identity that ought to matter is one's national identity. The other identities that might matter to a person - race, gender, sexual orientation, heritage, religion, etc. - those are secondary. What ought to define a person is how Canadian a person is. So we get just one big blob of Canadians who all act the same because they have prioritized the only identity that matters here.
Fuck off with your dishonest redefinitions, you evil snake. You're like the incarnation of Squealer from animal farm.
The Canadian state has no business treating anyone differently from anyone else. All must be equal in the eyes of the law, and nobody gets to be more equal than others.
People can be as different as they want but they have the exact same rights as anyone else. No more or less.
You're so fucking vile.
You really hate those who don’t think like you do. And you claim to an anthropologist?
You’re no Jared Diamond. You’re more like Savonarola.
Like traditional conservatives, people like ML want cultural and social conformity.
He knows what is best for everyone else!
I'm not talking about "the Canadian state". I'm talking about how people like Polivere and you want Canadians to view themselves. You don't want Pride parades or "Black History Month", just Canadians viewing themselves as just another Canadian. Obviously people are different but you don't want people to emphasize that difference, instead you'd prefer it if they conceal and hide those differences so that all blend in to the Canadian ideal. I think that's probably about right.
That sounds lovely.
You're so fucking vile.
Even Facebook's soon to be unemployed fact checkers agree that this is true.
"The Canadian state has no business treating anyone differently from anyone else."
They leave that to the provincial governments.
Conservatives think that culture matters. Why is this a surprise?
Canada's a pretty diverse place. Not the kind of place where a national identity is some rigidly enforced demand for absolute conformity.
including the deputy prime minister's surprise resignation last year
Okay, this statement is technically true; Freeland resigned in 2024, and it is now 2025, so it was "last year".
But it happened on December 16th, which is less than a month ago.
This was no slow burn where Freeland resigned and then there was a slow erosion of support and Trudeau found his position untenable.
Rather, on the very day that she was supposed to make a major financial presentation to Parliament, the Trudeau government's finance minister and deputy prime minister resigned, and as part of that resignation directly attacked the Trudeau government policies she had been scheduled to present and defend. And just 22 days later -- a period including the Christmas and New Year's holidays -- he was forced to announce the death of his own political career.
There had been a slow burn of the Trudeau government's popularity over the years, sure, but Freeland's resignation was the "Finish Him!" fatality.
"... certain aspects of Poilievre's plans—immigration restrictions and a proposed crackdown on crime, to name a few—might involve uncomfortable extensions of state power."
Or they might not. The lack of context for this speculation is bewildering. Doesn't it depend, Fiona, just a bit on what crimes he intends to crack down on and what restrictions he places on immigration, to name just two? And, by the way, immigration and crime are "two" not "a few" out of a whole long list of welcome reforms that are NOT "extensions of state power." In fact, since we're talking about Canada here, it would be almost impossible to imagine anything that state power had not already uncomfortably extended itself into long ago in Canada. In another Reason article recently there was mention of the difference between the impact of immigrants who were entitled to massive benefits in a welfare state and the impact of immigrants who were not entitled to welfare benefits but who were free to earn a living and arrange for their own living space in a free market state. Isn't it possible that a welcome restriction on immigration to Canada might just be refusing to entitle new immigrants to welfare benefits of any kind for the first year or two after they arrive (to name just one)?
Trudeau is like the pansy guys who you meet in any highschool. Girly semi-men who just want you to acknowledge how cute and wonderful and superior they are. Real men despise Trudeau.
Variously described as "libertarian" and "populist,"
And soon to be described as "far right" by MSDNC et al.
Trudeau and Kamala , identical in almost all respects.
Except he claims to be a man I see no evidence of that. Now, Kamala, there's a real man
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSqjg2arBqOx9bcXekoIX9t3EkPAwGuulrZlw&s
For all his liberty-friendly tendencies, certain aspects of Poilievre's plans—immigration restrictions and a proposed crackdown on crime, to name a few—might involve uncomfortable extensions of state power.
Ah, there it is. I had been wondering how this article was related to Fiona's unwavering support for illegal immigration.
Note that there is no mention in the article of the Tory leader promising to scrap/reform Canadian socialized health care/insurance policies. In that way, he is following his predecessors of all major parties. Canada's health system seems a lot more popular than Libertarians believe it to be.
The headline is incorrect. Canada's next PM will be the person selected by the Liberal Party to succeed Trudeau. That person will take the party into the next federal election.
It is remarkable that so many writers at Reason can't connect effective policing with a safe society that allows people to lead free lives. This is exemplified by the snide comment about stopping crime as "an extension of state power". No mention in the article of Trudeau imposing the Emergencies Act during the Trucker Freedom Convoy, which stripped every single Canadian of every single one of their civil rights. Now that's "an extension of state power".
What needs to be corrected is Trudeau's 2018 Bill C-75, which made it almost impossible to keep even violent criminals in pre-trial custody. In his 2023 speech to the Conservative Party convention, Poilievre pointed to statistics from the city of Vancouver, BC, where just 40 criminals were arrested a total of 6,000 times during one year. That is because within hours of each arrest, they were back on the street committing more crimes.
And not just property crimes. Vancouver has seen many random stabbings, including fatal ones. Nearby communities, like the one I live in, saw a criminal awaiting trial on multiple violent assault charges break into the home of a young woman and stab her to death. All because Trudeau made it nearly impossible to keep violent criminals in jail until their trial. That is what has to change.