American Public Has High Hopes for New Trump Administration
The incoming administration has an opportunity—if it can meet expectations.

Having soured on lame-duck President Joe Biden, Americans are anticipating the inauguration of his successor—and predecessor—Donald Trump. Whether they're looking forward to the new administration eagerly or with dread depends, but Trump won the election with a higher vote tally than his opponent, so we can assume that more people than not are pulling for him. That doesn't mean the public thinks his path will be easy. Voters foresee success in some areas, with rockier prospects in others.
You are reading The Rattler, a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, sign up for The Rattler. It's free. Unsubscribe any time.
Many Expect Things They Care About To Improve
"Expectations are highest that Trump will control illegal immigration, which 68% of U.S. adults predict he'll do," Gallup pollsters reported last week. "Smaller majorities believe he will reduce unemployment, keep the country safe from terrorism, improve the economy, keep the country out of war, cut people's taxes or reduce the crime rate."
Specifically, 60 percent think the return of Trump heralds reduced unemployment and improved safety from terrorism, 58 percent expect the economy to improve, 55 percent see the new president keeping the U.S. out of war, 54 percent foresee taxes reduced, and 51 percent anticipate lowered crime rates.
Fortunately for the incoming administration, the areas where Americans expect success correspond pretty closely with the public's priorities. The things people most care about feature highly in the list of those they expect to improve over the next four years.
"Both Democrats and Republicans cite immigration, the economy, inflation, and foreign policy as top issues," AP-NORC pollsters revealed in a poll published this week. Rising in importance by 12 points from a year ago, immigration was ranked as the most important issue by 47 percent of voters (69 percent of Republicans and 32 percent of Democrats). Foreign policy, which certainly involves the possibility of war, was down by three points from a year ago but still named as a top concern by 35 percent of respondents (40 percent of Republicans and 30 percent of Democrats). The economy, up by six points from a year ago, was cited as a top issue by 30 percent (35 percent of Republicans and 25 percent of Democrats).
Separately, the Tax Foundation found that "more than 80 percent of respondents think the US federal tax code needs reform." More than half say taxes are too high, while two-thirds call the tax code unfair.
Some Are Bound To Be Disappointed
That said, agreement goes only so far. According to AP-NORC, Republicans emphasize concern for government spending and debt while Democrats focus on climate and the environment. Both groups are likely to be disappointed on those points—at least, most people expect that to be the case.
"Majorities of Americans do not think Trump will heal political divisions in the country, improve the quality of the environment, improve the healthcare system, improve race relations, improve education, substantially reduce the federal budget deficit, improve conditions for minorities and the poor, or reduce the prices of groceries and other items," adds Gallup.
That's probably a realistic assessment. There's certainly no real national consensus over environmental issues at a time when President Biden is spending some of his last moments in the White House issuing executive orders that prevent future oil and gas exploration along much of the U.S. coastline in an obvious effort to thwart President-elect Trump's plans to "drill, baby, drill." During the presidential campaign, voters generally trusted Trump over Biden/Harris on energy issues and, despite the incumbent's last-gasp efforts, climate will be deemphasized under the new administration.
Similarly, while concern over federal deficits and the growing national debt are well-founded, there's not a lot of room for optimism. Trump showed little inclination towards restraint on spending during his first term, and Biden took that as a hold-my-beer challenge when he succeeded Trump. The federal government has been spending beyond its means for decades. Under both Republican and Democratic administrations, deficits have grown, topping $1.8 trillion in 2024. Federal debt and, importantly, debt held by the public rather than owed by the government to itself, have correspondingly soared as a percentage of GDP. This is a recipe for disaster, but unlikely to be resolved soon.
As for other issues for which Americans surveyed by Gallup predict little chance of success, some, such as political divisions and race relations, are cultural matters that evolve over time. Politicians might make them worse, but social tensions that developed over decades aren't going to be healed by soothing words from an elected official.
It also took the government decades to break education and healthcare with meddling, centralization, and generally bad policy. Americans are addressing education concerns themselves by embracing alternatives to public schools. As for healthcare, well, few politicians are eager to tell the public that it can't have the cost-free medical utopia that it desires. Tweaks around the edges for appearances' sake will likely make things worse.
And while many people's budgets were ravaged by inflation, it's a lot easier to increase the money supply and devalue the dollar than it is to return prices to their earlier levels. Trump himself admitted last month of grocery prices that "it's hard to bring things down once they're up."
But soon-to-be President Donald Trump is fortunate that majorities of Americans generally expect him to be successful on the matters about which they care the most. That's why more people voted for him than for Kamala Harris, after all. The public expects him to make the world safer, saner, and more affordable in ways that matter to them.
Americans Expect Too Much of the Presidency
Of course, having expectations of a politician doesn't mean those expectations are reasonable or achievable. Biden is a one-term president because he disappointed the public. The arrogance of his administration played an enormous role in its downfall, including its insistence on imposing big costs and changes that were resented by millions of Americans, and on muzzling dissent. But also playing a role is the excessive weight people place on the presidency; the belief that an elected official should wield vast power, heal all ills, create prosperity, and protect the weak—but somehow without subverting freedom.
What Americans want from the president is impossible to achieve—even before we get to the damage most chief executives inflict on the country and themselves.
In his second term, President-elect Donald Trump has an opportunity to fulfill the optimistic hopes of the Americans who put him back in office. We'll see if he's up to the job.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
According to the Trump ads that ran nonstop in Georgia the most important issue to voters was Trannie Dancing.
Twat about zombies from Haiti who sacrifice and eat my pet kitties?
Reveyon is over, your cat can rest easier now.
Not a Democrat retard.
Yeah, I imagine condemnation of their pedophile strip shows really got stuck in your craw.
Surprised you haven't whined about that earlier tbqh.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
The big issue is the economy, and the reality is that the economy is in good shape. Almost anything President Trump does is more likely to hurt the economy than to help the economy. The biggest thing that his administration could do is to make DOGE successful and that means approaching cutting spending in a very reasonable way. Can a person as bombastic as Trump act with restraint? I think he could have a good and meaningful Presidency if he can set back set realistic goal and get them done.
Parody.
Almost anything President Trump does is more likely to hurt the economy than to help the economy
Thanks for the crystal ball reading, MSNBC.
Say, do you have any example from his last term, before Covid, that could back that bold statement?
First the 2017 TCJA was unnecessary as again the economy was in good shape when President Trump took office. The tax cut increased the deficit, proved little, and step the economy up for a bigger fall when COVID did hit. President Trump's tariff on steel resulted in retaliatory tariff on soybeans, stressing farmer income and necessitating the farmer welfare program in 2019.
I see you got your talking points finally [not "staying away from politics" this week?].
What good is saying the economy is good when all your bills get higher? That's what the dems didn't understand.
If your only measure of the economy is that fact that prices have risen then you are an unhappy person. But inflation is going down and the remaining driving factor for prices will likely be wages. To reduce prices from current inflation levels will likely mean deflating wages. So, as a person are you happier when prices are lower if your wages are also lower?
Yes. Because my saved labor($) don't disappear due to inflation.
The economy isn't good at all; it exists literally on debt.
Would you call a company whos entire income is credit card debt a good economical company.
Ignorant people like you make me sick.
Your ignorance will destroy this nation.
Probably already has.
One is reminded of Democrats deriding Trump's failure to build the Border Wall during his first term, omitting that they had voted to deny funding for it. If he fails, at least some of those failures will be because his efforts were thwarted by opponents.
See: Selling all the existing steel beams paid for and set aside for the border wall being sold for pennies on the dollar by whoever is the actual president.
Don't forget all the court cases they launched to prevent it too. But, yeah. Buttplug tries to do that even now.
I thought he was going to make Mexico pay for it.
I thought Obama was going to make the oceans recede. I thought Joe Biden was going to restore the soul of the nation.
It's almost as though politicians say stupid, unicornian crap all the time, but only one particular party holds one particular orange president to the literal word of what he says.
^This
You mean Fox News doesn't exist? Because they certainly hold Democrats to the literal word of whatever they say.
Cite? Not a fox news viewer so I was unaware of this; I look forward to reading your cite.
He did in a fashion. By establishing the 'Stay in Mexico' policy Mexico was forced to pay to accommodate the 'asylumseeking' refuges while they waited to be processed. It stemmed the flow to the US. Mexico complained about bearing the extra expense as well. Not direct payment, but it certainly cost the US taxpayer less over that period of time as well as de-incentivized the people who tried to get in.
It seems like unelected bureaucrats that try to thwart him can be considered enemies of the people, no?
Considered? Absolutely. Actually prosecuted and fired or jailed? That part never ever happens, so the spiral continues.
In order...for the next 6 months
Debt ceiling increase
Make TCJA permanent, lower corp rate
Border Wall
Mass Deportation of illegal aliens + mandate eVerify + imprison and fine business owners employing illegal aliens
Pardon non-violent, non-property destroying Capitol Bldg rioters
Elimination of Dept of Education
Reduction of headcount of DC-based bureaucrats
Improve military readiness across the board
Other....anyone in the IC who had a hand in the Russia hoax gets walking papers and a reference to an attorney they might need in the future. I am fine with Kash Patel running wild at the FBI, it needs dramatic shaking up. The NSA, CIA need a major shake-up.
If he gets his way with tariffs we can expect more inflation.
Except that's not how inflation works, dipshit.
He changes definitions to attack conservatives and protect democrats based on whatever MSNBC said last night.
He will also continue to ignore the free money to his illegal immigrants IS a cause of inflation.
Will continue to rage at tariffs, but only from the GOP while ignoring regulatory costs or tariffs/bad trade acts from foreigners. Despite regulations being triple the cost effect of even the most pessimistic estimates of tariffs.
He will continue to not understand supply shift is an option many take and won't pay tariffs.
He will continue to not know the definition of free trade despite being given the literal definitions.
He will attack those trying to reduce federal spending while defending democrats.
Economists define inflation as the general rise in prices. The vast majority of the time the cause is monetary, however slapping huge taxes on imports will also have an inflationary effect. On the bright side inflation caused by tariffs can be easily alleviated by eliminating the taxes, unlike monetary inflation. But the fact of the matter is that prices of imported goods and prices of things made with imported goods will go up, because that's the entire point of protective tariffs. Prices of domestic goods will also rise as sellers adjust the prices to match the inflated import prices.
Your lies, personal attacks and strawmen won't change any of that.
They believe in "magic bean" economics.
They believe that they can refute an argument by attacking the person making it. They must. Because it's literally all they do.
Ideas!
Oh the irony of you two and your failed Keyenesian dreams.
If only your precious democrats and globalists could centrally plan just a bit more.
Like I said, your lies, personal attacks and strawmen don't change the fact that the protective tariffs you are defending by fucking definition raise prices, and that inflation is a general increase in prices, thus protective tariffs result in inflation.
""the fact that the protective tariffs you are defending by fucking definition raise prices""
Protective tariffs? Like this?
""But for too long, China’s government has used unfair, non-market practices. China’s forced technology transfers and intellectual property theft have contributed to its control of 70, 80, and even 90 percent of global production for the critical inputs necessary for our technologies, infrastructure, energy, and health care—creating unacceptable risks to America’s supply chains and economic security. Furthermore, these same non-market policies and practices contribute to China’s growing overcapacity and export surges that threaten to significantly harm American workers, businesses, and communities.""
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/05/14/fact-sheet-president-biden-takes-action-to-protect-american-workers-and-businesses-from-chinas-unfair-trade-practices/
So how much more can we expect to pay in 2025 because of Biden's protective tariffs in 2024?
So you can't wrap your head around the difference between targeted tariffs and blanket tariffs. Understood.
So how much more can we expect to pay in 2025 because of Biden's protective tariffs in 2024?
Can't answer?
I'll be more specific, how much more do you think green energy programs will cost with Biden's 2024 tariffs I posted?
Tariffs are not inflationary in the sense that they do not generally lead to a long-term rise in inflation, but the result will be a one-off increase in inflation. If people see prices rise, say, 10% because of tariffs, I doubt they will think to themselves, but it's only a one-off, and shrug their shoulders.
Speaking if magic beans economics.
Here shrike pretends behaviors do not change given an impulse into the system. That other factors to reduce regulatory costs or energy costs won't change behaviors or prices.
His magic bean thinking of all variables except one are static is quite hilariously retarded.
It would seem that that is exactly how inflation works or do you know some magic economic rule. Prices will go up on products with tariffs and that will in turn drive prices up on related products. Steel cost go up, trucks cost more, trucking fee rise, and products shipped in trucks go up in price.
Another ignoramous who believes supply shifts never occur.
In a world economy, supply shifts can become very hard. It is far more likely that tariffs will add to inflation than they will stimulate domestic production of common items. Companies will charge more, consumers will pay more, and little will happen because the capital costs to produce common items will not return enough on an investment.
So what's the 'inflation' factor on an 80% Domestic Tax?
Maybe it would be less stupid to UN-inflate Domestic ?Tariffs? before crying about 10% on Importers.
How much inflation did Biden's tariffs cause?
You still don't understand the difference between targeted tariffs on specific goods and general tariffs on all goods.
Is this because of willful ignorance or general stupidity?
You didn't answer the question.
I have answered the question a couple dozen times, only it was in reference to Trump's first round of targeted tariffs. Same reasoning applies. I thought you might be smart enough to figure that out. I was wrong.
Biden's tariffs, like Trump's tariffs during his first term, raised the prices of the things that were taxed. Because those taxes were targeted to specific goods, as opposed to everything, they did not cause a general increase in prices. The tariffs that Trump is currently proposing are not targeted to specific goods. They're on everything from our three biggest trading partners. Because they're on everything, instead of specific goods, the result will be a general increase in prices, otherwise known as inflation. If you can't understand that then there's something wrong with your brain.
""If you can't understand that then there's something wrong with your brain.""
This is what you are good at. Name calling. It doesn't make you look smarter either.
You've made it very clear that you don't understand the difference between tariffs on one or two specific items, and blanket tariffs on all imports. That makes explaining the inflationary effects of blanket tariffs impossible because your brain can't handle it. I'm done with this conversation. I'd have better luck explaining calculus to my cat.
""You've made it very clear that you don't understand the difference between tariffs on one or two specific items, ""
That's only in your mind. I even updated the question. How much more do you think green energy will cost as a result of the Biden's 2024 tariffs?
Steel and Aluminum
The tariff rate on certain steel and aluminum products under Section 301 will increase from 0–7.5% to 25% in 2024.
Steel is a vital sector for the American economy, and American companies are leading the future of clean steel. Recently, the Biden-Harris Administration announced $6 billion for 33 clean manufacturing projects including for steel and aluminum, including the first new primary aluminum smelter in four decades, made possible by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act. These investments will make the United States one of the first nations in the world to convert clean hydrogen into clean steel, bolstering the U.S. steel industry’s competitiveness as the world’s cleanest major steel producer.
American workers continue to face unfair competition from China’s non-market overcapacity in steel and aluminum, which are among the world’s most carbon intensive. China’s policies and subsidies for their domestic steel and aluminum industries mean high-quality, low-emissions U.S. products are undercut by artificially low-priced Chinese alternatives produced with higher emissions. Today’s actions will shield the U.S. steel and aluminum industries from China’s unfair trade practices.
Semiconductors
The tariff rate on semiconductors will increase from 25% to 50% by 2025.
China’s policies in the legacy semiconductor sector have led to growing market share and rapid capacity expansion that risks driving out investment by market-driven firms. Over the next three to five years, China is expected to account for almost half of all new capacity coming online to manufacture certain legacy semiconductor wafers. During the pandemic, disruptions to the supply chain, including legacy chips, led to price spikes in a wide variety of products, including automobiles, consumer appliances, and medical devices, underscoring the risks of overreliance on a few markets.
Through the CHIPS and Science Act, President Biden is making a nearly $53 billion investment in American semiconductor manufacturing capacity, research, innovation, and workforce. This will help counteract decades of disinvestment and offshoring that has reduced the United States’ capacity to manufacture semiconductors domestically. The CHIPS and Science Act includes $39 billion in direct incentives to build, modernize, and expand semiconductor manufacturing fabrication facilities as well as a 25% investment tax credit for semiconductor companies. Raising the tariff rate on semiconductors is an important initial step to promote the sustainability of these investments.
Electric Vehicles (EVs)
The tariff rate on electric vehicles under Section 301 will increase from 25% to 100% in 2024.
With extensive subsidies and non-market practices leading to substantial risks of overcapacity, China’s exports of EVs grew by 70% from 2022 to 2023—jeopardizing productive investments elsewhere. A 100% tariff rate on EVs will protect American manufacturers from China’s unfair trade practices.
This action advances President Biden’s vision of ensuring the future of the auto industry will be made in America by American workers. As part of the President’s Investing in America agenda, the Administration is incentivizing the development of a robust EV market through business tax credits for manufacturing of batteries and production of critical minerals, consumer tax credits for EV adoption, smart standards, federal investments in EV charging infrastructure, and grants to supply EV and battery manufacturing. The increase in the tariff rate on electric vehicles will protect these investments and jobs from unfairly priced Chinese imports.
Batteries, Battery Components and Parts, and Critical Minerals
The tariff rate on lithium-ion EV batteries will increase from 7.5%% to 25% in 2024, while the tariff rate on lithium-ion non-EV batteries will increase from 7.5% to 25% in 2026. The tariff rate on battery parts will increase from 7.5% to 25% in 2024.
The tariff rate on natural graphite and permanent magnets will increase from zero to 25% in 2026. The tariff rate for certain other critical minerals will increase from zero to 25% in 2024.
Despite rapid and recent progress in U.S. onshoring, China currently controls over 80 percent of certain segments of the EV battery supply chain, particularly upstream nodes such as critical minerals mining, processing, and refining. Concentration of critical minerals mining and refining capacity in China leaves our supply chains vulnerable and our national security and clean energy goals at risk. In order to improve U.S. and global resiliency in these supply chains, President Biden has invested across the U.S. battery supply chain to build a sufficient domestic industrial base. Through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the Defense Production Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act, the Biden-Harris Administration has invested nearly $20 billion in grants and loans to expand domestic production capacity of advanced batteries and battery materials. The Inflation Reduction Act also contains manufacturing tax credits to incentivize investment in battery and battery material production in the United States. The President has also established the American Battery Materials Initiative, which will mobilize an all-of-government approach to secure a dependable, robust supply chain for batteries and their inputs.
Solar Cells
The tariff rate on solar cells (whether or not assembled into modules) will increase from 25% to 50% in 2024.
The tariff increase will protect against China’s policy-driven overcapacity that depresses prices and inhibits the development of solar capacity outside of China. China has used unfair practices to dominate upwards of 80 to 90% of certain parts of the global solar supply chain, and is trying to maintain that status quo. Chinese policies and nonmarket practices are flooding global markets with artificially cheap solar modules and panels, undermining investment in solar manufacturing outside of China.
The Biden-Harris Administration has made historic investments in the U.S. solar supply chain, building on early U.S. government-enabled research and development that helped create solar cell technologies. The Inflation Reduction Act provides supply-side tax incentives for solar components, including polysilicon, wafers, cells, modules, and backsheet material, as well as tax credits and grant and loan programs supporting deployment of utility-scale and residential solar energy projects. As a result of President Biden’s Investing in America agenda, solar manufacturers have already announced nearly $17 billion in planned investment under his Administration—an 8-fold increase in U.S. manufacturing capacity, enough to supply panels for millions of homes each year by 2030.
Ship-to-Shore Cranes
The tariff rate on ship-to-shore cranes will increase from 0% to 25% in 2024.
The Administration continues to deliver for the American people by rebuilding the United States’ industrial capacity to produce port cranes with trusted partners. A 25% tariff rate on ship-to-shore cranes will help protect U.S. manufacturers from China’s unfair trade practices that have led to excessive concentration in the market. Port cranes are essential pieces of infrastructure that enable the continuous movement and flow of critical goods to, from, and within the United States, and the Administration is taking action to mitigate risks that could disrupt American supply chains. This action also builds off of ongoing work to invest in U.S. port infrastructure through the President’s Investing in America Agenda. This port security initiative includes bringing port crane manufacturing capabilities back to the United States to support U.S. supply chain security and encourages ports across the country and around the world to use trusted vendors when sourcing cranes or other heavy equipment.
Medical Products
The tariff rates on syringes and needles will increase from 0% to 50% in 2024. For certain personal protective equipment (PPE), including certain respirators and face masks, the tariff rates will increase from 0–7.5% to 25% in 2024. Tariffs on rubber medical and surgical gloves will increase from 7.5% to 25% in 2026.
These tariff rate increases will help support and sustain a strong domestic industrial base for medical supplies that were essential to the COVID-19 pandemic response, and continue to be used daily in every hospital across the country to deliver essential care. The federal government and the private sector have made substantial investments to build domestic manufacturing for these and other medical products to ensure American health care workers and patients have access to critical medical products when they need them. American businesses are now struggling to compete with underpriced Chinese-made supplies dumped on the market, sometimes of such poor quality that they may raise safety concerns for health care workers and patients.
Today’s announcement reflects President Biden’s commitment to always have the back of American workers. When faced with anticompetitive, unfair practices from abroad, the President will deploy any and all tools necessary to protect American workers and industry.""
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/05/14/fact-sheet-president-biden-takes-action-to-protect-american-workers-and-businesses-from-chinas-unfair-trade-practices/
""You've made it very clear that you don't understand the difference between tariffs on one or two specific items, and blanket tariffs on all imports.""
I guess you never read the link. It's obviously not one or two specific items.
You keep talking about what Trump says he will do but you think he lies all the time and has no morality. Why do you believe him when he says thing you don't like?
Semiconductors and battery components are in almost everything today. That's bound to jack up the price in a more widespread way.
Trump like to rattle sabers before negotiating. If you knew as much as you pretend about Trump you would know that.
I'm not a fan of the guy but that seems to be his style.
I know! I know! the difference.
sarcs ... "difference between targeted tariffs"
target ... TRUMP.
Government spending will continue to rise, the deficit will also rise as Trump cuts some more taxes, there will not be the large-scale deportation of illegal immigrants that "everyone" wants as the GOP faces opposition from donors in unskilled-worker-intensive industries.
Unemployment isn't a problem and there's not much scope to reduce it, therefore. It might go down from 4.2% to 3.6% or so. Aside from during Covid, unemployment has not been a genuine problem for over a decade. It started coming down sharply under Obama and then continued the declining trend under Trump until Covid. (As with GDP you cannot tell from the chart without dates when Trump took over from Obama. Not true for the deficit, though.
And crime is low anyway, notwithstanding the usual scaremongering.
Wow, everything is awesome out there! No wonder the party in power was re-elected.
I neither said nor implied that it was. However, people's perceptions may be political reality but they're not actual reality. If people believed that unemployment was higher than it was and that crime rates were high, it doesn't matter when it comes to voting what the actual data showed.
Care to make some economic predictions for the next four years?
"" However, people's perceptions may be political reality..."
This is the way, politically speaking.
So why did dems think it was a good idea to tell people their perceptions were wrong?
So why did dems think it was a good idea to tell people their perceptions were wrong?
Either a poor model of human behaviour, or simple incompetence.
More magic bean parody from shrike.
Using knowingly false government numbers while ignoring labor participation. Just one example.
Still blames Trump for Democrats baseline budgeting and continued elevated spending even after he left.
Shrike is a moron lol.
What's extra hilarious is shrike has defended energy regulations, other regulations, dem spending, and attacked any conservative pushing tax cuts.
Someone setting a woman on fire and watching her burn will make people feel unsafe regardless of what the statistics are.
Dems lost an election by burying their heads in the sand. They really have lost their way. People react and vote according to how they feel not what the stats are. The dems once understand that. This last election cycle we saw how much that was abandoned. Saying but crime is down, but the economy is great, failed to gain traction in the voting booth. Everyone knows how expensive things have become. Trying to tell everyone they are wrong and the stats are right is a horrible political strategy.
Yes indeed.
Trump had better political acumen than Harris.
Yup.
"Trump won the election with a higher vote tally than his opponent, so we can assume that more people than not are pulling for him."
This is a flat-out face-palm-level error by the author. No, that CAN'T be assumed. While Trump did receive more votes than Biden, Trump did not receive a majority of votes cast for all candidates.
""Trump did not receive a majority of votes cast for all candidates.""
Why would this matter in the US?
It doesn't matter to the outcome of the election. It is relevant to claiming that a majority supports Trump or at least hopes he does well.
This is a flat-out face-palm-level error by the author. No, that CAN'T be assumed. While Trump did receive more votes than Biden, Trump did not receive a majority of votes cast for all candidates.
Trump has never received more votes than Biden. He received more votes than Harris.
The last paragraph is the key. Americans' growing illiteracy on civic matters, especially what is meant by "Federal", separation of powers, etc. leads to ridiculous expectations and conflicting sentiments (the Gov't is incompetent, but I expect them to solve every problem) Unfortunately, Trump is hardly someone we expect to acknowledge there are limits on what he can, should or will do. That will be the ultimate undoing of DOGE. They'll want to take a blowtorch to the administrative state and Trump will want programs, which require a large administrative state under his control and can bypass Congress. I expect a lot of feel-good stuff, but not much change in long term prospects for the public fisc. The bright spot will continue to be the US is a lot better off than any other country.
^This
""Trump is hardly someone we expect to acknowledge there are limits on what he can, should or will do. ""
Every president seems to do that. Voters are the same. They want to elect a president that will solve all their problems not acknowledging that the president is not that powerful.
What's amazing/not amazing is Biden actual admitted he did not have the power to forgive student loans before trying to do so. So even when a president knows their limits, they will try to push them because they have a phone and a pen.
American Public Has High Hopes for New Trump Administration
This headline is the answer to the question: "How can I say that the "American Public" is not paying attention to what politicians actually say and do without saying it in those words?"
There is no question that Trump will disappoint. Many of his proclaimed plans and objectives make no sense, and he is appointing a largely incompetent collection of twits to implement his promises. His latest wet dreams are stealing the Panama Canal from the country of Panama, and bullying Denmark to give us control of Greenland. It's going to be the nut-job cause of the week in the White House.
Oh, I forgot to mention his idea of renaming the Gulf of Mexico to be the Gulf of America. That will certainly go over well with our ally Mexico. While the MAGAts will like the bravado involved, the leaders of the rest of the world are going to see this as just another egomaniac fantasy.
So the American public didn't learn at all from his first term.
De-Regulation Committee.
Paris Accord Rejection.
EPA de-funding.
Tax-Cuts.
Immigration control.
~1/2 the deficit of Biden or Obama with a [D] trifecta.
I'll tell you what I learned from the first term.
Trump is a lot more patriotic than his campaigning was.
I didn't even like him when he ran for his first term.
I LEARNED.
Something that appears to be impossible for Leftards too busy being [WE] Identify-as RULES gangsters.