How FOIA Gave Rise to Government Transparency Laws Around the World
Flawed as it may be, the U.S. Freedom of Information Act became a model in transparency for other countries to follow.
It's well-known that the government heavily censors documents before declassifying them—something humorously captured by The Onion in 2005 with the headline, "CIA Realizes It's Been Using Black Highlighters All These Years." But from a glass-half-full perspective, it's incredible that the U.S. government shares information with the public at all. The original Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) of 1966—the law under which many of those redacted documents are obtained—was the "product of years of slow campaigning by a network of journalists, scientists, and politicians seeking to make the government more transparent," the historian Sam Lebovic writes in State of Silence: The Espionage Act and the Rise of America's Secrecy Regime. FOIA was later strengthened in the wake of the Watergate scandals in the 1970s.
The efforts of those American activists opened the floodgates around the world. Out of 195 countries, 121 now have freedom of information or government transparency laws, according to FreedomInfo, a website run by George Washington University's National Security Archive and Article19, a British free speech nonprofit. All but two of those countries adopted their laws after America's FOIA reforms, and the vast majority came after the Cold War ended.
Only Scandinavia was ahead of the curve. Sweden's Press Act of 1766, one of the world's first free expression laws, also required authorities to open up public records. Nearly two centuries later, in 1951, neighboring Finland passed the Publicity of Official Documents Act, which was "somewhat more limited than the Swedish model," according to a U.S. Department of Justice report.
There's a difference between freedom of information in theory and in practice. France passed a freedom of information law in 1978, but "the law has so many exceptions that it is totally ineffective. Almost everything is classified 'confidential defense' and when a document mentions an identity, it is rendered inaccessible," French journalist Paul Moreira has complained. He now leads a campaign to make France's law more like America's FOIA.
Meanwhile, China has made a "steady pivot away from earlier tolerance of (and even active support for) more transparent access to information" a decade ago to treating "data on even relatively mundane government or social trends" as "sensitive," according to the Council on Foreign Relations.
Still, it speaks to the power of the U.S. model that everyone feels the need to at least pretend to respect freedom of information. We have American activists and the U.S. Congress to thank for that.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "FOIA for All."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Ever since the Euro first came out (lol, NPI), I can't help but laugh every time I see Sweden. Maps like this remind me of that.
something humorously captured by The Onion
Ehhhh, doubtful. The Onion would have to be funny for that to be true.
The Onion is hilarious, especially when skewering the nutty far right -- which seems incapable or resisting the temptation to funnel it new material.
Cite needed.
The onion is Marxist shit that only retarded sub humans enjoy... Ohhh I see why you think it's good
Wow. I have no words. How did you say something that makes you look even more retarded?
You probably also believe that Biden was a good president either a omg list of accomplishments.
"The Onion is hilarious, especially when skewering the nutty far right..."
Steaming pile of lefty shit checks in.
I laughed at something in the onion once, in the late 90s.
Hold that thought because an author long ago made the same point about the Declaration of Independence ---which REASON is always minimizing
The Declaration of Independence: A Global History Hardcover –
by David Armitage
"This is meant to be a succinct, focused argument about the influence of the Declaration around the globe and across time"
C'mon, consign Ayn Rand to the outer darkness and start pushing the Declaration..."endowed by their Creator with unalienable rights"
What's the rub. I think it is 90% "Freedom of Religion", which liberals and libertarains both work behind the scenes to dismantle and thwart .
The Declaration of Independence includes a rather clear anti-Catholic bash that is obscure today but would have been obvious to anyone reading it then. It is amazing that Charles Carroll signed it, but there is also evidence that Carroll that liberal views.
Try a cite or a quote next time. Your track record makes it unlikely people are going to waste time looking for something obscure based on your word alone.
I think Charli is a sqrrs sock when he's on his meds
Either way, he’s a stupid cunt.
And a steaming pile of lefty shit.
He was referring to his interpretation of it.
Yes, because King George was such a Papist
Did he pape a lot of women?
There is no "freedom of religion," only the ban on Congress making laws that establish an official religion or restrict the practice of religion by individuals. Since then would-be religious persecutors have tried to sneak it in through the back door by claiming that other religions dilute traditional American culture (which, by the way, is not protected either and in the opinion of some of us, not worth preserving officially); and progressivists who want to eliminate religion altogether have tried to claim that any public expression of religion harms non-believers and infringes on their right NOT to practice religion. Both of these social forces are intolerable. You have a right to believe whatever nonsense you like and to practice your religion any way you like - as long as you don't violate any reasonable laws against murder, rape, robbery, etc. in the process - and they don't have a right not to be exposed to your practices just because they're fragile sensitivities might feel threatened.
Yeah goverment transparency is great.
When is your artical about the secret service being ordered to whipe their phones in order to avoid legal ramifications comming out?
FOIA is there to ensure that icky republicans are held to account. Not so much for the democrats that Reasons rafters vote for, however ‘strategically and reluctantly’.
Like, with a cloth?
Working great...
https://ussanews.com/2024/12/22/public-schools-using-multimillion-dollar-fees-to-stop-parental-foia-requests/
"In September 2022, Clair heard back from FOIA Coordinator Matthew McDaniel who told her that she would have to pay over $33 million for an employee, who was being paid $46 an hour, to review 21,514,288 emails."
LOL. If only there was a way to programmatically search text in multiple files for repeating patterns.
The moving force behind that 1766 Swedish Press Freedom Act - Anders Chydenius - is almost criminally underappreciated. He also explained the invisible hand and how individual freedom improves society - 10 years before Adam Smith and more clearly and concisely. He wasn't an influence on the Anglo/US version of founder era liberalism because he wasn't translated into English then.
When god imposed the curse of languages on his people at the Tower of Babel he did more than he knew! He may have set back hubris a few dozen generations but he also set back the bible and missionaries hundreds of generations and peace on earth, good will to men possibly forever.
When I lived in Sweden, I was shocked to learn that even personal tax returns are public. On slow news days, journalists would peruse the tax records, and then publish scandalous details about rich people. That's how we learned that the author Astrid Lindgren was once assessed income tax of 115% of her gross income.
How dare she be self employed.
Socialist regimes are awesome. Can you imagine if the democrat media had full access to everyone’s tax returns?
What is the punishment for an official who refuses to comply with the FOIA? I rest my case!
Mean chants at a campaign rally.
A Contempt of Congress charge that goes nowhere (those are only stick to icky MAGAs asserting constitutional rights)
Like Steve Bannon going to jail, but Liz Cheney engaged in flagrant witness tampering and will probably skate.