Biden Commutes Nearly All Federal Death Penalty Sentences
Biden preserved the death sentences of three mass murderers but commuted the sentences of 37 other federal death row inmates to life in prison.

Under pressure to fulfill a campaign promise before he leaves office, President Joe Biden will commute the sentences of nearly all federal inmates on death row to life in prison today, with the exception of three mass murderers.
The White House announced today that Biden is commuting the death penalty sentences of 37 out of 40 federal death row inmates, leaving only three sentences intact: those of Robert Bowers, who killed 11 people at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh in 2018; Dylann Roof, who killed nine black parishioners at a South Carolina church in 2015; and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the Boston Marathon bomber.
"Make no mistake: I condemn these murderers, grieve for the victims of their despicable acts, and ache for all the families who have suffered unimaginable and irreparable loss," Biden said in a White House statement. "But guided by my conscience and my experience as a public defender, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Vice President, and now President, I am more convinced than ever that we must stop the use of the death penalty at the federal level. In good conscience, I cannot stand back and let a new administration resume executions that I halted."
Biden faced pressure from a broad coalition of civil liberties, law enforcement, and religious groups—including Pope Francis—to fulfill a 2020 campaign pledge to end the federal death penalty. The Biden administration had imposed a moratorium on federal executions but continued to seek the death penalty in terrorism and mass-murder cases. For instance, the Justice Department recently filed capital charges against Luigi Mangione, the alleged murderer of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.
The issue took on life-and-death stakes after Donald Trump won reelection. The incoming Trump administration carried out 13 executions in the final six months of its first term and will almost surely lift the Biden administration's moratorium.
Criminal justice groups applauded today's news. Bryan Stevenson, the founder and executive director of the Equal Justice Initiative, said the commutations mark "an important turning point in ending America's tragic and error-prone use of the death penalty."
"By commuting almost all federal death sentences, President Biden has sent a strong message to Americans that the death penalty is not the answer to our country's concerns about public safety," Stevenson continued.
The commutations were supported not just by bleeding-heart liberals, but also by crime victims directly connected to some of the cases.
"I would like to commend President Biden for the important action he has taken today," Donnie Oliverio, a retired police officer whose partner was killed by a man whose sentence was commuted today, said in a press release. "Putting to death the person who killed my police partner and best friend would have brought me no peace. The President has done what is right here, and what is consistent with the faith he and I share."
That sentiment was not universal, though. Relatives of Joyce Fienberg, one of Robert Bowers' victims in the Tree of Life shooting, wrote a letter to Biden urging him not to pardon Bowers.
"The pardon power should only be utilized on the merits of a case or crime, not en masse to further a political agenda," the letter said. "Nothing in this crime merits a pardon or commutation of sentence."
The matter of Biden's sincerity about his faith and what it compels him to do is between him and the Catholic Church and God, but if he believes the death penalty is morally wrong, then of course it would be wrong to execute Bowers and the other two remaining death row inmates, and it would be wrong to continue seeking death sentences for future administrations to carry out. As Andrew McCarthy writes at National Review, the Biden administration's populist death penalty stance—it's philosophically unacceptable except for crimes of public notoriety—is cynical and insulting on any deeper reading.
But it will also placate most criminal justice groups and avoid the worst political blowback, and it will clear most of the federal death row before January 20 rolls around. In other words, it's the sort of action that defined the Biden administration's attempts to roll back a carceral system Biden helped create.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Don’t execute murderers, but if you have gotten too old or infirm, you are wasting the lives of caretakers and should be put down.
This^^ is the only reason I still click on the articles.
Trump should shoot the last three himself on pay-per-view.
I would pay to see that.
If anyone is an authority on mass murdering, it oughtta be Videla or Peron's Pope. Hitler's Pope, former nuncio Pacelli, proved a most useful tool in Christian National Socialism's war on Jews. Interestingly, nobody is willing to tote up how many of those inmates happen to be government killer-killers. It took Maryland Senator Joe Tydings of Buncombe County to first disclose that citizens murdered by prohibition goons numbered over 3x what government alleged. [NYT 10/13/29 26:1] (Chicago Tribune 10/12/29)
You know now that's all lies, Hank. So why are you saying it?
The Myth of Hitler's Pope
And what the fuck was even the point of that comment under an article about Biden?
Every single one of our Democrats here are nothing more than trolls. SQRLSY, Hank, Sarkles, Shrike, mtrueman, Lying Jeffy, etc do nothing but shitpost and troll.
They’re all pretty worthless, and inveterate liars too.
How does Comstock fit into this?
Hank also managed to jam in prohibition. In an article about commuting death sentences.
But nothing about girl bullying.
Next up, pardons and commutations for everyone who might be prosecuted (i.e. held accountable for committing crimes during the past decade) by Trump's Justice Department during the next four years.
Biden has assured his next title of Worst President in US History, replacing James Buchanan (whose incompetence resulted in the civil war).
But just as the nation was rescued from Democrat Buchanan's disastrous Presidency by Republican Abraham Lincoln, Donald Trump will rescue our nation from Biden's.
Although I oppose the death penalty, sweeping pardons of all death row inmates is absurd, and will not increase support for banning (or further restricting) the federal death penalty.
Only Congress has the Constitutional authority to enact/rescind the federal death penalty.
You pretty obviously do not understand what pardon or commutation means. That ain't Congress you moron
Explain to us why he's wrong, J(ew)Free.
Show some civility, you retarded bitch.
I am, personally, loving the norms being defended here before Trump comes in and ruins 'em.
We don't need a federal death penalty, and it is too bad Joe did not pardon the lot. I know the three left presented a heavy lift, but he is catching flak already and a little more will not matter.
That is not Biden's to decide unilaterally.
Article II, Section 2, Clause 1:
The President...shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
Unless you are arguing that one/all of those prisoners on federal death row was being impeached (or was involved with a Presidential impeachment), then the Constitution is as explicit as you can get that it is the PRESIDENT who has the power to reprieve - unilaterally.
It is not up to the President to unilaterally decide if thereciscto be a federal death penalty. That is the job of Congress.
He is not eliminating the federal death penalty. Even if he were to offer reprieve to everyone on death row (which he isn't doing - but has the unilateral power to do), he would not be eliminating the death penalty.
Whether or not to shit his pants or wander around the garden looking for leprechauns is not Biden's to decide. If I were the family of someone murdered by one of these pieces of shit, I would sue based on the fact the guy who is allegedly making these pardons hasn't been the President in years.
Yes it was. Just like the truly awful people DJT pardoned when he was in office.
Yes it was. Just like the truly awful people DJT pardoned when he was in office.
We do need it, and we don’t use it enough. Every one of those scumbags should be put down. It figures your kind are cheering this on. Always on the wrong side of everything.
Sorta surprised he didn't 'pardon-in-advance' Luigi
"The White House announced today... Biden said in a White House statement."
So, Joe Biden didn't do or say anything.
And do you know who is even more in absentia than Joe Biden? Kamala Harris.
Too busy getting Sarcasmic’d 24/7.
It is another dictatorial abuse of power by the worst president of my lifetime that is both morally hubristic and politically cowardly as he considered the last three death row convictions to politically fraught to commute as one is War on Terror crime and the other two were ethnic/racially motivated.
Also, if you think what he did here is acceptable for the reasons given, do not ever argue that pro-life policies are somehow a violation of separation of church and state again.
The real scandal here is that we don't even know who made the actual decision. We can be sure that it wasn't senile old Joe.
Like and subscribe
Yeah if this were truly about his convictions about the death penalty why the exceptions? Oh that's right he got praised by criminal justice reformers and the pope who are also apparently unprincipled assholes.
If you cannot figure that out...
Did he check with all of the lawyers employed filing appeals? Will any of them be losing jobs? This could hack 20 million dollars out of the GDP and shrink the economy. Why stop at 3 left?
I wouldn't call it the death penalty for these violent criminals.
I would call it involuntary euthanasia.
So he did this for religious reasons? Doesn't his faith say the same about abortions?
Innocent babies get no rights. Rapists and murderers are God's children. Because science.
The only faith Biden has is in his political grift. And the only god he sees is the one in the mirror. Just like every other democrat.
So instead of waiting for an execution that never happens, you wait in prison until you die of old age. Big whoop.
Good article CJ. Nice job of exposing the cynicism here.
This is a tough one.
On the one hand, I respect the notion of curbing the death penalty. The State should not be in the business of intentionally killing its citizens.
On the other hand, I have said for decades that our prison system is weak, coddles its inmates, encourages further crime, facilitates abuses, and that the fear of offending 8A has diluted the idea of retributive justice (and I've offered ideas for modernized prisons that can respect 8A while still subjecting cons, who absolutely deserve it, to the hardest time they'll ever know for everything from drug possession to serial murder).
On the third hand, liberalism/leftism/progressivism/socialism, whatever we're calling it these days, is evil. And this is clearly a liberal/leftist/progressive/socialist agenda at work. Joe Biden (or anyone else, including the Pope) do not get to claim they're doing anything "in good conscience" while they still support abortion, illegal immigration, LGBT pedo, or any other anti-human/anti-American agenda that the left embraces.
On the fourth hand (GORO!), how serious were we about killing these people in the first place? If we were really going to do it, then we should have offed that Boston Marathon bomber a decade ago. Just like we should off that guy who murdered the healthcare CEO 30 seconds after his guilty verdict. IF we're being serious about our commitment to capital punishment.
Obviously, the correct answer here is the one you've heard - and some of you have whined and cried - about before: serious, real, genuine prison reform. Modernized single cells that the inmates NEVER leave until their sentence is up. We have the technology. We have the engineering capability. We simply lack the will.
Build a real prison, make it real time, and maybe stuff like this wouldn't bother people. But with our cockamamie soft justice prisons, commuting a death sentence just further confirms that the American left isn't serious about criminal justice. (And we all know that lolertarianism is wholly anathema to the idea in the first place.)
Apparently you have NEVER been to a supermax prison. They are in the cells 23 hours per dat and the one hour they get to exercise is in an isolated "bigger cage."
Cool. Why aren't all prisons like that? Literally, every single one. Why do we even use the moniker "supermax" as if that's something beyond what the norm should be?
Because most of the prisoners will serve their sentences and be released back into society. It is not in our interest to treat them in such a way that guarantees they'll be insane when they get out.
Then don't let them out if they've gone insane instead of being rehabilitated. I mean, duh.
Some POTUS should issue a full pardon to all those convicted of victimless crimes. Next, Edward Snowden should be unconditionally pardoned and given the Metal of Honor with a monetary reward as restitution for lost revenue/career.
Biden could have moved against the federal death penalty at any point during his term. If he had, this end-of-term mass pardoning wouldn't have been necessary and he could have avoided the appearance of a partisan preference. I'd call this, doing the right thing for the wrong reasons.
Sometimes people forget that presidential pardon power can be used on an ongoing basis, as well as en masse. In 1862 President Lincoln pardoned all but 38 of 303 Native Americans who were sentenced to death after the uprising in Minnesota. Apparently he did so after a prominent Minnesotan advocate of Native rights appealed to him personally to consider each case in detail. His act cost Minnesota Republicans some seats in Congress.
During the course of the war Lincoln pardoned more than 300 deserters who had been sentenced to death. This was more a matter of personal values for Lincoln than politics and public opinion. In 1863 he forbade the executions of deserters under 18. After going through their court-martial records he pardoned deserters who had been influenced by Southern sympathizers, and boys who had deserted only out of homesickness and loneliness.
Biden did the wrong thing for the wrong reason. He is most likely getting laid to do this. Which is the case for many of his pardons.
The Big Guy needs to padhis retirement, and that of his scumbag family.
Bwhahahahahaha
First of all the death row inmates sentance were commuted, NOT pardoned. They are now living in prison for the rest of their life as opposed to ever getting out. The death penalty is NOT a deterrent and it never has been.
No criminal who has been executed has ever committed another crime.