Review: Arena Magazine Is Embracing Capitalism and the Future
"Our mainstream media is hell-bent on tearing down the future before we can get too good a glimpse," the publisher wrote in the debut issue.

"The new needs friends," says food critic Anton Ego in the Disney movie Ratatouille. Arena magazine doesn't just echo that sentiment—it emblazons it on the cover of its inaugural issue. "Misunderstandings and misinterpretations of new things are used to make the public fear innovation, and to hate innovators," writes editor and publisher Maxwell Meyer in a "manifesto for the future" at the start ofthe Texas-based publication's first issue, released in summer 2024. "Our mainstream media is hell-bent on tearing down the future before we can get too good a glimpse."
For someone eternally frustrated by the doomerism, tech panic, and casual anti-market sentiment permeating both mainstream and avant-garde media, reading Arena was refreshing. The magazine delivers a hefty dose of optimism and excitement not in spite of the current state of capitalism and innovation but because of it—an unapologetic insistence that the present is worth celebrating, the future bright, and some past "failures" worth reevaluating. For instance, a story on supersonic flight frames it not as an obvious flop but as an idea that could have succeeded (and may yet succeed) if regulators would get out of the way.
There are some misses here, including a pretty standard-issue essay complaining about social media (phone addiction "is a public health problem"). But there's plenty of good stuff to atone for such missteps, including a Judge Glock article panning the Federal Trade Commission's "data minimization" crusade and a Brian Chau essay on AI and how "monopoly fatalism can be a self-fulfilling prophecy."
With only one issue so far, it's too soon to declare Arena a future must-read. But it's off to a promising start. Consider me a friend.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Good luck on your new job ENB. May it be as successful as Mastadon.
That mag is fucking awful.
I agree. "How to spend a trillion dollars" with all sorts of bowing to "responsible", "competition", and all the right buzzwords, but it justifies the government dumping a trillion dollars into such projects because it has already wasted so much on wars, what's another trillion among friends?
If you think we shouldn't be spending money we don't actually have, then we're on the same page. That doesn't make it evil to think about how money might be spent better.
As long as they don't confuse Neo-liberalism with free markets, I might give it a look.
We're not off to a good start...
The sexy way of future -reproduction seems to involve a lot of stainless steel tables, rubber gloves, centrifuges and turkey basters.
Extra points for "old-fashioned" way being in scare quotes.
Hmm, pointless bitching, but not as much as I suspected.