Just What the CEO Shooting Needs: A Video Game Moral Panic!
NBC reports the assassin's video game habits, as if they matter.

On Monday, police arrested Luigi Mangione, suspected of being the gunman who killed UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson last week. Right away, the internet scoured Mangione's online presence, deducing numerous details about his life (a privileged Ivy League graduate in the tech world) and his potential motive (a painful and debilitating injury). But NBC News offered an odd theory of its own.
"Luigi Mangione, who was arrested and charged with murder in the shooting death of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson, once belonged to a group of Ivy League gamers who played assassins," the article begins. "In the game, called 'Among Us,' some players are secretly assigned to be killers in space who perform other tasks while trying to avoid suspicion from other players."
If that feels like a particularly weak parallel to draw, it should.
Among Us is an online multiplayer game rated for players aged 10 and up, based on its "fantasy violence" and "mild blood." It's also very popular, and not just among violent vigilantes: The game has over 150 million registered users and averages more than 10 million active users each day. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D–N.Y.) even played Among Us on an October 2020 livestream. Clearly, one's interest in a very popular party game is not an indicator of future criminal violence.
The NBC News article nearly admits as much, noting that the "child-friendly" game "has been wildly popular, especially during the pandemic, and particularly among young children because of its simple mechanics, colorful cartoonish nature, and unpredictability."
To be clear, NBC does not say that Among Us is to blame for Mangione murdering a health insurance executive; it merely quotes a college acquaintance who found it "ironic" that someone he primarily interacted with in the context of a game featuring killers would, himself, end up a killer.
And sure, there's some dramatic irony in that sequence of events. But it certainly doesn't rise to the level where it should lead a major national news network's write-up of the suspect's arrest.
In fact, multiplayer video games in which players kill each other have long been a popular pastime: Earlier generations would gather around TVs to play Halo or GoldenEye 64 against each other. The coffee table book LAN Party, released earlier this year, depicts numerous multiplayer gaming sessions from the early 2000s.
Even apart from the digital space, Among Us follows the same basic format as numerous card games: Partygoers since the 1980s have played Mafia, in which some players are deemed "civilians" and others are deemed "mafia," and each team tries to suss out and kill the other.
Instead, NBC's decision to choose the video game anecdote as the focal point of its article is reminiscent of the numerous times violent video games have shouldered the blame for real-world violence.
The most prominent example is the 1999 shooting at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado. "Many commentators and some parents are wondering aloud about what influence—if any—video games may have had on the actions of the two gunmen," The New York Times reported just days later, noting that the pair were fond of first-person shooters Doom and Quake. Lawmakers have tried to either ban or severely limit the sale of violent video games, only to be struck down by courts for violating free speech.
Even as far back as 1976, the arcade driving game Death Race allowed players to run over screaming civilians. The gameplay was primitive and the graphics looked more or less like Pong, but a representative of the National Safety Council complained to the Times that the game could lead to violence: "I shudder to think what will come next if this is encouraged. It'll be pretty gory."
"Research clearly suggests that exposure to violent video games temporarily increases a person's hostility," Villanova University psychology professor Patrick Markey wrote in 2013. "However, research does not show a clear link between playing violent video games and real world violence. Although researchers have often noted the preference of violent video games by many school shooters, given that 97 percent of adolescents play video games such a preference is not overly surprising." Research conducted in the years since has further disputed the link between video games and violence.
And yet the claim has persisted, cited both by President Barack Obama and by President Donald Trump after mass shootings during their respective tenures in office.
Again, perhaps NBC did not intend to imply a direct correlation between two unrelated events. But in choosing to lead its coverage of Mangione's arrest with the tidbit that he once enjoyed playing a particular video game, the outlet appears to be playing into age-old tropes that a ubiquitous activity enjoyed by millions is actually some pernicious force of evil.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Kids who played Pacman, end up eating ghosts as adults.
If a gorilla comes in my yard, I’m hitting it with a hammer.
You have to. If you don’t, it will throw barrels at you.
Found the cause if the obesity epidemic. Great work.
Indeed. Ghosts are mostly empty calories.
Based just on the Call of Duty series, there should be thousands of people running around with a sniper rifle doing head shots. Afterward, teabag.
In general, while there is raging, video game violence actually lets you get aggression out. Sure you need a new TV after throw the controller though it but you don't run outside and beat someone.
I wonder what happens when everyone under 50 rolls their eyes collectively at the same time
"The earth moves!"
The applause light goes on and everyone in the studio audience cheers while Jon Stewart mugs for the camera.
It's not unusual for people, even those who have training and should know better, to reverse cause with effect and forget about confounding variables. The adage that correlation does not imply causation comes in here somewhere also. I don't think Joe's opinion that wondering about possible relationships in this case rises to the level of a moral panic or worthiness for comment by a network news organization counts for much, either. For example, although it's highly unlikely that playing video games causes people to become assassins, it's quite likely that potential assassins might be drawn to assassination simulations; or even that some skills needed to become a successful assassin might be learned by playing them. Just sayin' ...
Tough choice for NBC.
Real reporting with lots of research and cited quotes about how the federal government has totally fucked up health care under (mostly) democrat policies, including how the media runs left wing propaganda coverage, or a creative fluff piece blaming comic books.
Sorry, not comic books, pinball.
Sorry, not pinball, rock and roll.
Sorry, not rock and roll, hippies.
Sorry not hippies, video games.
I think I have caught up now.
It’s the damned videa gamez!
Not quite. It's Social Media now.
Well don't just stand there, DO SOMETHING for God's sake! ANYTHING!
There, a sufficient dose of moral panic du jour.
There needs to be a law! Why isn't there a law!?
It’s leftism in general. We need McCarthyism back in a big way.
Caught up maybe but you skipped the 80s greatest hit; D&D.
Correct, my omission.
(although there was a lot of the eighties where I didn't pay attention)
hippies
One of these things is not like the other ones. I don't recall any sort of moral panic over hippies. I recall a general disdain. I recall a rather factual observation or conception that the intellectual and social detachment for which hippies prided themselves provided a target-rich environment for serial killers and sociopaths. But I don't recall anyone, let alone many someone's or society at large, having a morally-based hatred of hippies.
Hippies rioted in my hometown in the 70's. They were presented to me by my parents/ grandparents as the obvious end of civilization.
Note, I did team up with the class hippie for my senior design project. Of course, I did all the work, especially after our third team member was deported back to China halfway through the semester
You have now. I hate hippies with every fiber of my being. I want them deported. Then imported, shaved, showered, and shot. Then deported again. Fuck hippies.
I want them deported. Then imported, shaved, showered, and shot. Then deported again.
The lazy, Godless hippies are coming for our jobs!
Seriously, I get how extreme laziness and lack of vigilance leads to an erosion of morals and the fall of Western Civilization and I get how hippies frequently embody those things, but that's, as indicated, categorically different than "Rock 'n roll music is corrupting our youth."
The people I know who hate lazy, unkempt, smelly hippies hate lazy, unkempt, smelly homeless people, and lazy, unkempt, smelly immigrants and lazy, unkempt, smelly natives... to the point that, yeah, if nobody does any jobs, or takes care of themselves their family or their property, it really rather literally is a/the collapse of civilization.
It's like saying chicken's concerned about not laying eggs are morally panicking.
Your reasoning is sound. Now help me shave, shower and shoot all these fucking hippies.
I want to blame public libraries. All of the killers throughout the last 50 years probably stepped into a public library at least once and became a killer.
it merely quotes a college acquaintance who found it "ironic" that someone he primarily interacted with in the context of a game featuring killers would, himself, end up a killer.
Who was it? Alanis Morrisette?
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D–N.Y.) even played Among Us on an October 2020 livestream. Clearly, one's interest in a very popular party game is not an indicator of future criminal violence.
I dunno... AOC seems like she could get criminally violent, and the future ain't over yet.
The Future Starts Slow
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiLjuRG3hoE
I figured AOC would play ’Dustborn’.
Look, the media has been trying very hard to not admit the obvious motive. Don't expect them to stop now, just because we have the guy's actual manifesto.
I played Pong once in 1977 and since then no white dot has been safe from my wrath.
If you used white paddles to oppress your opponent, you must be racist - - - - -
FFS, The dude is a real-world, ready-made character to "Assassin's Creed: Fundamental Rights", "Assassin's Creed: Last Rights", or "Assassin's Creed: Cure" that just needs some quasi-relevant, once-removed denizen of history's back story fleshed out and glued on (Joseph Lister had something to with medicine and... let's see... his Dad was wealthy and privileged and inventive, voila! Add in some references to Abstergo and Pieces of Eden and call it a day) and Among Us is the goddamned video game panic we get?
Actually, the most important question remaining to be answered in this assassination is not WHY he murdered Thompson but how he knew exactly where and when to attack his victim! Did he have inside information on the movements and plans of the CEO of a major corporation? How did he know that Thompson had rejected protection by body guards? Did his computer skills allow him to hack into corporate calendars?
Duh! Like Hillary calling people Deplorables and Biden called them garbage and Dems calling Trump a fascist. Gee whiz, you mean there is polarization in our society.
Pretty sure most of this goes away if we get rid of the Democrats.
Have you even tried to calculate the carbon footprint of burying that many bodies?
Pretty sure a guy who goes by "Fire up the Woodchippers" doesn't BURY bodies.
You can always ascertain a killer's political leanings by reading how the media chooses to report it. Or not report it.
Anybody want to tell me why we already know infinitely more about this twat than either of the two dudes who tried to snuff Trump six months ago?
Don't forget The Covenant School, and the Mandalay Bay Shooter.
I hope the gaming industry learns that no matter how woke they get --- they will never, EVER be woke enough.
But you will lead to tens of thousands of jobs lost as people stop buying the shitty product you make.
It isn't video games, it's those damn kids and their rock and roll music !
But mainly it's the psychoactive drugs, prescription and otherwise.
Yeah, what a person does is no clue to their character at all. And of course social science 'research' is 100% scientific and dependable, reproducibility be damned.
There are some reporters who commit crimes, therefore all reporters are suspect according to the illogical nonsense of the NBC reporter.
In reality "most" if not every single person is an individual who operates as individual even when they are members of a larger group. We still have ownership over our actions and while a person who plays a specific video game may be inspired by the violence, it's not the video game that is causing the problem. How many murderers ride e-bikes, drive cars, drink milk, eat meat, etc.. Oh, the violence of eating meat could have inspired the murderer, or wielding a rolling projectile commonly referred to as a car.
People forgot about Grand Theft Auto already? Steal cars, run over pedestrians, shoot whoever you want, nobody blinks. Add a mild sex-themed secret mini-game (Hot Coffee) inside the main game, and people freak out.