It's Time To End Double Taxation for Americans Living Abroad
Most people don't realize it, but if you're a U.S. citizen, the IRS wants to know about all the money you earn, no matter where in the world you earn it.

The new year will bring a new administration, and I'll be watching to see if President-elect Donald Trump's team finally puts an end to the worldwide taxation of individual Americans' income. Fixing this is imperative. It would not only be sound fiscal policy but could keep millions of law-abiding Americans living overseas from being treated like financial pariahs.
Trump seems to agree. "I support ending the double taxation of overseas Americans," he promised in a campaign statement. This problem is rooted in America's bizarre worldwide tax system.
Most people don't realize it, but if you're a U.S. citizen, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) wants to know about all the dollars or euros you earn, no matter where in the world you earn them. This isn't about jet-setters or Americans hiding money in offshore accounts. It's a tax grab that applies even if you haven't lived here for decades and pay your fair share in another country. It's like having the IRS follow you around the globe, demanding an account of every paycheck, bank account, or investment.
Here is how it works: If you live and work exclusively outside of the United States, you must file a U.S. tax return reporting your income, foreign bank accounts containing over $10,000, retirement accounts, investments, and other financial details. You're responsible for paying U.S. taxes on income above certain thresholds and navigating complex forms and rules to avoid or minimize double taxation.
This is not only unfair but uniquely so. The United States is the only developed nation that taxes based on citizenship rather than residency. We are in terrible company. As the Cato Institute's Adam Michel writes, "Eritrea's brutal dictatorship is the only other country to come close, imposing a 2 percent levy on all expatriates."
Double taxation most commonly sets in when you live in one of the many countries not covered by a tax treaty, or for foreign-earned income not protected by the Section 911 exclusion (which currently exempts up to $126,500) or other provisions that "allow foreign tax credits to offset similar taxes paid to other governments," Michel explains.
Common financial activities that are tax-advantaged in one's country of residence (like retirement accounts or home sales) may still trigger U.S. tax liability. Americans living abroad must essentially maintain two parallel tax lives and shoulder a higher burden than either U.S.-based taxpayers or those in their country of residence.
The better alternative is a territorial tax system, based on the principle that income should be taxed where it's earned. Under such a system, if you are an American living and working in Singapore, the income you earn there is taxed only in Singapore. Territorial taxation is a fundamental concept of sound tax policy that the U.S. citizenship–based system violates. In fact, Trump's tax reform of 2017 changed the worldwide taxation of corporations to quasi-territorial.
But the worst of it lies in how remarkably difficult banking has become for many Americans overseas. Thanks to the misguided Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), foreign financial institutions often choose to deny services to U.S. citizens living abroad rather than deal with the complex reporting requirements. These individuals can thus encounter enormous difficulty in opening bank accounts, getting mortgages, and participating in local investment and retirement plans.
To recap, Americans abroad must pay taxes in their country of residence, file and potentially pay additional U.S. taxes on the same income, and can't always expect adequate financial services, all despite typically receiving very few U.S. government services. Some who face these burdens maintain minimal ties to the United States.
The penalties for noncompliance are wildly disproportionate. Simple filing mistakes can result in tens of thousands of dollars in fines, even when no tax was owed. Complexity makes such mistakes easy to commit, even with professional help.
While the administration has tools to limit FATCA enforcement, altogether ending it would require congressional repeal. The best way, of course, would be for Trump and Congress to work together.
As for the underlying problem of worldwide taxation, the U.S. should join the rest of the developed world and adopt a residence-based tax and reporting system. This would address all the aforementioned problems and stop treating solid citizens like criminals—all while maintaining the ability to tax U.S. residents on their worldwide income and combat actual tax evasion.
Such a reform would also save government resources wasted on processing complex returns from Americans abroad who ultimately owe no taxes. It would encourage global mobility for U.S. citizens, including many who are abroad promoting U.S. companies, and make American workers more competitive internationally.
COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Americans living abroad?
So does that mean that Richard Levine guy as the surgeon general gets taxed double?
I'm just wondering if reason will advocate they lose their right to vote if not taxed. North Carolina apparently has thousands of voters living abroad who never even lived in the state. The judges said their vote counts despite residency requirements to vote.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/29/politics/north-carolina-appeals-court-overseas-voters/index.html
That is a question I hadn't thought about much. It's a good one, especially for US citizens who were born abroad and who live abroad. Since all US voting is at the state level, how are you eligible to vote if you have never had an established residence in any state?
Abroad, not as a broad, LOL!
"Deadnaming" people gets you triple taxed
To recap, Americans abroad must pay taxes in their country of residence, file and potentially pay additional U.S. taxes on the same income, and can't always expect adequate financial services, all despite typically receiving very few U.S. government services. Some who face these burdens maintain minimal ties to the United States.
I can't with you Veronica.
Y'know, if we'd just voted for Ted Cruz a near-decade ago, we'd all be doing our taxes on a postcard. Flat tax, everyone contributes.
However, since we can't have nice things, there is a simple solution. Renounce American citizenship. Expat. Live abroad and call it a day.
But if you want "adequate financial services" and you expect "US government services" - then chip in your piece for the luxury and privilege of calling yourself an American. I don't like taxes any more than you do - but if I have to pay them, then anyone else calling them an American citizen has to pay them too. (And don't even get me started on the people with zero tax burden. They should have their citizenship stripped and provided an airline ticket to any third-world nation of choice.)
Why don't you just say, "I want all the rights and guarantees of an American, but none of the responsibilities or obligations or accountability." I mean, that's LOLertarianism in a nutshell, isn't it?
End voting for Americans living abroad. Sure, they're US citizens
but if they don't reside in the US why should they be able to vote here? I'm OK with an exception for those who have a legitimate residence and spend some amount of time there each year so long as they aren't dual or multi-nationals voting in a foreign country.
There's US citizens living on US soil whose votes don't count.
I just can’t help but think things would be so much better off we would be if we just got rid of the democrats.
How many did you kill today?
Not nearly enough. Although killing them isn’t really necessary. There are number of locations that will work just fine for mandatory relocation.
Don't worry. They're suicidal. Because they're self-loathing idiots.
"How can I make up for my shameful existence!?"
"Worship a sun god that hates you for breathing, and then castrate your kids."
"OK!"
"Then move to Canada where they'll kill you if you express in passing that you feel like you might have had a bad day."
"OK!!!!"
Seriously. Friggin' leftists.
The key is to keep them taking the rest of us down with them and, while I'm not sure how this whole MAGA thing will turn out - I'd say that's guaranteed for the next four years.
There will always be more. Putting aside the obvious moral problems with "getting rid of" 40% of the country, they keep making new people and people will always form a diversity of opinion on politics.
This is the dumbest comment system ever.
derp.
If you want to live abroad and don't want to pay taxes, then renounce your citizenship and became a citizen of where you live.
Otherwise you are reaping the benefits of American citizenship because paying for them.
1) If U.S. income tax were truly the counterpart of the 'rights and guarantees of an American,' then foreigners in the U.S. should not be required to pay for it.
2) By living abroad, you actually stop benefiting from many advantages of being a U.S. citizen residing in the U.S
3) Renouncing us citizenship is pretty costly and subject to taxation.
4) Some people born in the US but who never lived there had to pay quite a lot of money in order to renounce their citizenship.
5) Almost no other country taxes non-resident nationals on their foreign income. The U.S. can only do this because of its international predominance, using its power to siphon foreign money that would otherwise be spent locally.
6) Because of this rule, even I (a non us citizen living in a non us country) had to formally declare that I was not an us citizen to open a bank account, because foreign banks are bullied by the US authorities.
Except they still do have services they enjoy that most domestic citizens do not, such as embassy access. So they still do use government services. They still have benefits from military services. Etc. Etc.
I don't use welfare and have to pay foe that shit. Non domestic citizens can pay into the system too, they are utilizing it. They are even eligible for Medicare if they ever return domestically. Despite not paying into it.
That's true of all guaranteed benefit welfare systems, including social security, medicare/medicaid. If you're a European citizen, there are pension plans, free healthcare etc which you can also benefit from if living abroad-- and you technically don't pay into those if you're earning money abroad.
And it appears that some countries fix that as thus:
So that would be an easy fix-- if you're living abroad, you simply don't get medicare until you're on US soil using the US healthcare system etc. Social security is a slightly different issue as that's not a 'service', that's just a check that gets deposited in your bank account. All of these systems are going to be imperfect, but income tax, as its structured is the most invasive and immoral way to tax your populace.
People who live in the US and pay no federal taxes get those services too. What's the difference?
I always thought the vast majority of Americans living abroad were the same liberals insisting everyone else pay their fair share.
"Citizens of the World"
But something something pay your fair share damnit and just be thankful we don't take it all!
Better yet just do what a "libertarian" magazine should advocate, and end all income taxes.
Especially on labor. If I work for it, it should be 100% mine. Not 10-40% the city/state/feds.
"Income Tax is theft. Jet-setting millionaires hardest hit"
Again, a fine point about the injustice of the tax, but you found extremely unsympathetic victims.
Could you imagine how rich this country would be if the Federal, State and local government just stopped doing almost everything they currently do?
There are plenty of non-millionaires working and living abroad. But I don't think they pay much in US tax. I believe you deduct foreign taxes. I still don't like the invasion of privacy required (but that applies to all income tax).
Could you imagine how rich this country would be if the Federal, State and local government just stopped doing almost everything they currently do?
That's what we really need. Make it small enough that it doesn't need to be funded by income tax.
If only there was some other form of taxation that didn't involve knowing what you do during the day and how money got IN to your account.
You know, I'm ok with taxing foreign income (its not 'double-taxation' as the article headline claims) as long as we have taxes in the first place.
You want the protections of access to the US government, you want a place to flee to if your current home goes to shit, if you want a say in the future of the country - pay some taxes. At least submit your tax return and get credit for the tax you pay to your place of residence (which is actually how foreign income is taxed).
What should change is the USG's intrusiveness in foreign banks that makes being an American expat hard to remain banked.
How about just a fee if you want those services?
Here's a better idea: Eliminate the income tax and replace it with another way to tax such as a national sales tax.
Just imagine eliminating 95% of the IRS, you keep more of your hard-earned money, the Treasury coffers filling daily and no more complex, onerous and confusing tax code.
Oh, wait.
That makes sense.
My bad.
Yes. Income tax is way too much of an invasion of privacy. Government has no business knowing how much money everyone makes and where it comes from. Sales tax has some similar problems, but at least it doesn't require government access to absolutely everyone's private financial information.
You could even fund a small government with excise taxes or even *GASP* tariffs!
I'm not a fan of tariffs, but I'd be happy with an across the board tariff at a fairly low rate if government was <10% its current size and income tax was completely eliminated.
I prefer it to a sales tax as it is more voluntary. Don't buy an imported item, no tax. Otherwise every time I go next door to buy an egg from my neighbor with chickens, we both have to fill out paperwork.
If it's low enough that it's not a huge barrier to trade I think I agree. Sales tax I would prefer to income tax. But it still requires a lot of reporting of people's private business. Tariffs aren't completely free of that sort of problem, but far fewer people are importers and exporters and customs declarations are already a thing.
A national sales tax bill is already before Congress. HR-25, The Fair Tax bill. See http://www.fairtax.org. I'll note, here, that it's a hard tax to evade; even criminals and tourists will have no choice but to pay it, and it's paid anonymously. It replaces income, payroll, and corporate income taxes. It features a monthly "prebate" to all US citizens of the amount of the tax that a family of the same size would pay for necessities (at the Federal poverty level).
I never got double-taxed living abroad.