The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Has Fueled a Surge in Campus Censorship
The portion of college students who say it's OK to shout down campus speakers is rising, according to a new survey.

Last year, student-led protests over the Israel-Hamas war broke out at dozens of college campuses. With the new school year well underway, student demonstrations have begun again in earnest.
While many students expressed their opposition to the war in Gaza through peaceful means, some protests devolved into property destruction, trespassing, and even violence on a handful of college campuses, including at some of America's most elite universities. Many students erected large encampments claiming public space on campuses—a form of protest that colleges are generally free to limit under reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions.
According to the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), attempts to deplatform speakers were surging by this April. Of the 67 attempts it had recorded from January to mid-April, 73 percent involved controversy surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. So how did a year of raucous—and occasionally disruptive and destructive—protest affect student opinions on free speech?
In September, FIRE released its fourth annual College Free Speech Rankings. The survey, which polled almost 60,000 undergraduates from more than 250 colleges, asked students a wide range of questions about free speech and the campus climate affecting it. The survey—as in past years—also asked questions about whether they would find it acceptable for students to engage in various kinds of disruptive protests of a hypothetical controversial speaker on campus.
About 37 percent of respondents agreed it was "sometimes" or "always" acceptable for students to shout down a campus speaker; last year, only 31 percent said the same. In all, fewer than one in three students said that it would "never" be acceptable to shout down a speaker.
Less than half of all students said it was "never" acceptable to protest by blocking other students from attending a controversial speech—a decline from last year's 55 percent. Nearly one in three said they would support violence to stop a campus speech in at least some circumstances. In 2023, only 27 percent of students said the same.
These results don't necessarily show the percentage of students who would engage in these activities themselves—rather, they reveal the proportion of students who might condone actions from other students that restrict speech.
The rising support for disruptive and even violent tactics among college students is a disturbing shift. Increased protests over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict likely accelerated this trend, but the data show that students' tolerance for censorship and obstruction has been growing for some time. This year, only 48 percent of students said it was never acceptable to block other students from attending a campus speech. In 2022, upwards of 62 percent of students said as much.
While the latest Israel-Hamas war is drawing more attention to this trend, the seeds of the erosion of respect for open discourse were clearly planted before October 7, 2023.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Censorship on Campus."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
One thing the campus demonstrations by hamas supporters has shown me is just how woefully ignorant and gullible our young college aged adults actually are. Another thing is the warped moral compass these young adults evidently have; I blame their parents for that.
I think these students need a "year abroad" in Gaza or Lebanon. Let's see how many blue-haired transgender feminists come home.
You mean the Israeli holocaust in Gaza.
Countries keep joining the United Nations genocide case against Israel. 15 countries to date.
What has come of the US reneging on its signatory obligations to the United Nations while continuing to support the Israeli holocaust against Palestinians?
For one, the world has finally recognized that the US has zero credibility and its words are worthless. It’s just another shithole pariah state, like Israel will forever be recognized as.
For one, the world has finally recognized that the US has zero credibility and its words are worthless. It’s just another shithole pariah state,”
The only way to save yourself is to leave.
Refuted.
Retarded.
"...15 countries to date..."
One or two accepted as "countries", steaming pile of Nazi shit.
You’re a lying waste of skin Kol Nidre boy.
Countries that have formally joined the case against Israel
South Africa
Bolivia
Maldives
Chile
Türkiye
Spain
Palestine
Mexico
Libya
Columbia
Nicaragua
Countries that have declared their intention to participate in the case against Israel
Belgium
Egypt
Ireland
Cuba
Refuted
Why are you already in Iran, fighting for your Islamist masters in your jihad against peace loving Jews? Could it be you don’t have the courage of your convictions?
Or maybe you just don’t have any courage at all.
Oh, and refuted.
Misek, the useless antisemitic POS, is welcome to fly his sorry ass to gaza to help his hamas homies.
The dude is chickenshit.
What the heck is a "Palestinian?"
You keep making up terms. Stop that.
Your hatred for Jews has jumped the shark, Rob. Now you think they're engaged in a "genocide" with something that only exists in your imagination. Seriously, sit back and think about that for a minute. You're literally in MTG "space lasers" territory here.
You’re too stupid to recognize or refute that October 7 was an inside job.
The video proves that Israel, funded, coordinated and enabled the October 7 attacks.
https://richardgage911.substack.com/p/new-documentary-on-gaza-october-7
It shows that Israel opened the gate to welcome trucks carrying Hamas through the wall.
It shows how Israel not only ignored repeated warnings from their many surveillance sources but withdrew all defences from the wall and emptied their military bases just hours before the attack
It shows that Israel didn’t respond to the incursion for more than 6 hours. Allowing the few Hamas attackers free access to concert goers, kibbutz members and young women IDF surveillance operators.
It shows and proves that after that 6 hour window the IDF attacked the concert goers and the kibbutz’s with Apache helicopters and tanks to blame Hamas.
It shows that Netanyahu sacrificed dozens of IDF forces to blame Hamas.
It shows that only handfuls of Hamas soldiers wandered for hours through the evacuated areas looking for soldiers to fight but finding none.
It shows that the hostages that were taken by Hamas said they were treated well.
It shows that Israel/Netanyahu has funded Hamas with billions in cash in suitcases in the backs of cars for many years.
With all this evidence you’d have to be a willfully ignorant idiot or lying Kol Nidre boy not to recognize it as an inside job.
Which are you?
If you’re going to be a Nazi troll, can’t you at least be an interesting Nazi troll?
Jews not Nazis are committing a holocaust in Gaza today.
Now deny the Holocaust too.
You are.
Not the one you're pretending exists. The actual one.
No. Stick them in Iran.
Full sharia law. Death by stoning. Women are property. Men who can't grow full beards and won't execute a Jew baby in his crib are traitors.
Gaza and Lebanon are but mere proxies of Iran. Let's send them to the source. And if they just happen to be there when Israel nukes Iran, well... darn.
One thing the campus demonstrations by hamas supporters has shown me is that Reason and FIRE didn't even generally acknowledge "that colleges are generally free to limit under reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions" until *after* they were practically hit over the head with how politically and socially untenable their "these people are simply exercising free speech by just passively occupying campus spaces" stance is/was.
Be interesting to know if they're still defending "Local campus children's tranny burlesque shows are just free speech" or if they dropped that shit like a nuclear hot potato.
Kids are always gullible and have always been gullible. What is more disturbing is that adults in the media (see Reason - though that is also an editorial guideline/edict that the NYT sells to set a journalistic agenda everywhere) are continually diverting attention to US campuses every time there is a news story that might be about Palestine. You can see it in the tags here - esp before Oct 7. Every time there is a story tagged 'Palestine', it is usually a story about American students on college campuses carrying signs or chanting songs that include the word 'Palestine'.
A very effective propaganda technique to ensure that the American public (that means YOU) remains as stupid as can possibly be imagined - with no possible acceptable questions that can be asked about what the US is doing in that part of the world. It's all about college campuses.
We’ve been helping Iran and Hamas. That will come to and end this coming January 20th. Then Hamas will surrender or be annihilated. Iran had better learn their place too.
Any democrat attempting to help these terrorist entities should be tried for treason.
We live in the age of STEM and often look down on liberal arts which include history. Young people do need history and the failure to understand the problems of the Middle East shows this more than anything else.
The Middle East is just lacking a suitably brutal empire to keep the place in line.
The Middle East wasn't a shing beacon under the Ottoman Empire either. Back then people did not really have the weapons or media to make the news.
Heckler’s veto is a thing that angry, immature folks utilize.
Hopefully there is no math in this article -or- if so that a man checked it before it got posted.
Nearly one in three said they would support violence to stop a campus speech in at least some circumstances.
"I mean, as long as it's speech I disagree with."
Kids that were never told no while growing up.
You were told no when Jesse muted you. :p
What did that grey box say??
I’m suffering so badly after being muted.
On a scale of zero to Ken muting sarc, how much pain has this caused you?
I unmuted the grey box to post my list.
DLAM
Sqrsly
I may unmute you and make you ambassador of the squirrels.
What have I done to deserve this terrible fate?
Nit voting for Chase because he is apparently gay.
How could I be so foolish?
You may always admit the error of your ways, and plead for mercy at the court of JesseAZ. No guarantees, but that could work.
Do you really want to be grouped with SQRSLY on being muted?
This is a no win situation.
Dlam...I can act as an advocate (of sorts) for you, and plead your case at the Court of JesseAZ. Judge Jesse will then deliver a verdict.
Chase wasn’t gay enough. I question his commitment to same sex sodomy. So how could any libertarian vote for him in good conscience?
Is DLaM Jeffsarc, or Pluggo? I swear, we need a scorecard to sort out which sock belongs to which Marxist democrat here.
My prediction: these radical students and progressive campus groups will get worse over the next four years, partly by reflex and partly as they create sanctuaries for Democrats. The same goes for left wing cities and states, as already announced by Pritzker, Polis, and Newsom. Of course, Trump could pull a reverse Biden on student loans, and cancel loan benefits by executive order. That would be interesting.
Why will it get worse? The candidate with the most Arab and Muslim-American votes won with the support of leftist former-Dems like anti-war Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr.
Hamas will probably beg for peace now that Trump is back. Iran will likely back down before long too.
I love the constant "Well, MOST of them were peaceful."
Hey, so where 1/6 defendants. Didn't seem to work out too well for them. Hell, most of them were not even raucous yet STILL got years in prison.
Reason, still, could not be bothered to get worked up over it...so their assumption that THEIR sacred cows will generate any empathy is borderline laughable at this point.
Fuck these over-entitled fuckwits.
Abolish (and defund) higher ed! (At least the model of "college for all" and the dilettante humanities programs.)
Just stopping federal subsidies of science and college would end wokeness on campus.
Rich kid tantrums. There is way too much tolerance for this. Let them say whatever the hell they want, but when they start breaking things, attacking people and disturbing the peace, prosecute the shit out of them and maybe they might learn enough lessons to change the trajectory of their lives.
The best lesson neo Marxist college activists can learn is at the business end of a nightstick.
Very educational, and not easily forgotten.
Have the mohammedan terrists released the people they kidnapped while invading Israel?
I doubt that more than a handful are still alive.
Wait til Hank finds out all those people he knew from the 1800’s are dead.
An entire generation genocided by time.
The portion of college students who say it's OK to shout down campus speakers is rising, according to a new survey.
Is this a reprint from 2015 or did we just discover something that everyone else has been talking about while getting accused of wasting time on "kutlur war hurr durr"?
Also, UW president suffered her own personal Kristallnacht despite caving into pro-hamas protesters at every turn.
Where is Aaron Brown to point out the less than stellar scientific methodology of the FIRE study? Oh right, I forgot. Reason only brings him out in support of their positions.
Is campus camping still ok?
I have conducted my own poll and found that 73% of Reason articles now use false or misleading titles to get me to read what turns out to be a report of the results of yet another meaningless opinion poll. In the current example, "a Surge in Campus Censorship" there is almost no evidence one way or the other about campus censorship anywhere in the article! Student opinions about the okayness of using the heckler's veto do not constitute actual censorship on campuses. Indeed, the heckler's veto - violent or otherwise - is not an example of censorship. Reasonable time, place and manner restrictions may be a form of censorship depending upon how "reasonable" they actually are, and how even-handedly they are applied opinion-wise, but that trend isn't reported here under the mislabeled title.
To say nothing of the obvious false narrative of the article.
"A surge in campus censorship?" And yet, even if that were true, it doesn't point out that the root cause is a surge in campus anti-Semitic nazism which is ideologically supported BY the school.
I have to blame this ones on Progressive. They have for so long championed that idea of limiting speakers at colleges and universities in the name of safe spaces and now they are seeing that all come back on them with the war in Gaza. The reason you let the people you disagree with speak is so you can speak your self.
Schools invest heavily in their efforts to recruit and accept the best qualitied students. Best screening question would be to call upon applicant's to say whether they would approve of and contribute to the silencing of invited speakers, faculty, and other members of the school community. If they said they would, that should mean automatic rejection by the school; if they say the wouldn't, then they should be considered further for acceptance, and their pledge not to go along with deplatforming any speaker at any time while enrolled as a student should be treated as a contract with the school, breach of which mean automatic expulsion.
What's wrong with my idea? Anything?
I have a radically different view. Universities are not government. They may receive government funds, but that is a separate matter. Our constitution protects us from government infringement on our rights. Employers, universities, non-profits, private businesses, and clubs, etc., are not the government.
These institutions exist for a specific purpose: academic research and learning. As such, I believe academic inquiry, expression, debate, guest speaker events, and students' papers and discussions should be 100% protected. Those should not be censored.
But protests? That's not censorship. Forget that noise. The. 1960's was filled with toddleresque idiots and never ended. Disurpting campuses, impeding the work of campuses (incl. guest speakers), or creating a hostile environment for other students should not be protected and shutting that down isn't censorship.
In fact, if universities don't, they are in breach of contract with the other students who are having the very expensive educational experience they are paying for disrupted.