Polymarkets in Everything
Plus: Democrats admitting big cities have big problems, Tulsi Gabbard's appointment, and more...

A raid, for show: Polymarket founder and CEO Shayne Coplan, 26, had his Soho apartment raided yesterday morning by the feds.
For the uninitiated, Polymarket is a betting website that accurately predicted the outcome of the presidential election, contra many pollsters. Now, Coplan is the subject of a joint criminal investigation by the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York as to whether he ran the site as an unlicensed commodities exchange.
You are reading Reason Roundup, our daily, morning newsletter.
Want articles just like this in your inbox every morning? Subscribe to Reason Roundup. It's free and you can unsubscribe any time.
The feds seized Coplan's devices, which has led to truly excellent tweets. Hey, if they're gonna do all this in public, so should he.
new phone, who dis?
— Shayne Coplan ???? (@shayne_coplan) November 13, 2024
But many speculate that Polymarket is getting in trouble not because it did something terribly wrong—indeed, nobody was harmed or defrauded, bettors are all willing adults, who in some cases made out like bandits—but because it disrupts the old way of doing things and embarrasses those in power. "Financial markets are generally pretty efficient, and the evidence suggests that the same is true of prediction markets," Eric Zitzewitz, economics professor at Dartmouth, told CNN. "There's no virtue-signaling in an anonymous market when you're betting."
Polymarket works by allowing users to buy shares tied to a specific outcome. Each share then trades somewhere between $0 and $1; correct bets pay out a dollar, so you can earn a fair chunk of change (as one French trader did, betting that Donald Trump would win the election). It's all run peer-to-peer on the blockchain, so there's no bookie.
"Election betting is a murky legal area in the United States. In 2022, Polymarket agreed to stop offering its services to U.S.-based users after settling with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission for operating without registration. The company paid a $1.4 million fine," reports The New York Times. But since then, the fact that you can access Polymarket easily with a VPN is an open secret; there are tons of U.S. users, contra what the feds would like.
And that French trader, mentioned above? Many theorized he was trying to manipulate the odds. "How accurate could this platform's predictive power be if one zealot can go all-in and distort the odds?" asked CNN, to which Coplan countered: "If someone takes a really big position on Trump…there is someone on the other side, a counterparty," frequently doing the opposite. "When you see the odds on Polymarket, it is not a function of how much money was put on either side, it is a function of market price at that moment," explained Coplan. "Some trade that someone made two weeks ago doesn't have bearing on what the market price is right now."
Polymarket not only called races pretty accurately, successfully crowdsourcing wisdom from those acting in their own self-interest, but also pretty early. A chart of comparisons:
Hours ahead, every time. pic.twitter.com/97BiW58RJw
— Polymarket (@Polymarket) November 6, 2024
The company's spokesman said the raid on Coplan's house was "obvious political retribution by the outgoing administration against Polymarket for providing a market that correctly called the 2024 presidential election."
"It's discouraging that the current administration would seek a last-ditch effort to go after companies they deem to be associated with political opponents," wrote Coplan yesterday on X. "We are deeply committed to being non-partisan, and today is no different, but the incumbents should do some self-reflecting and recognize that taking a more pro-business, pro-startup approach may be what would have changed their fate this election. Polymarket has provided value to 10's of millions of people this election cycle, while causing harm to nobody."
"The election will pass, but Polymarket as a format of information for the masses, and a way of thinking about current events + the future, is unquestionably here to stay," wrote Coplan last week on X before the election results had even come out. He was further vindicated a mere day later, once Trump's victory became clear. We'll see if the feds agree that his platform is here to stay.
Scenes from New York: Liberal darling Ezra Klein finally breaks the pundit omerta and admits what we all knew to be true: That cities governed by Democrats mostly suck, plagued by high cost of living and plenty of public disorder and inexcusable crime that, in some cases, doesn't even get prosecuted. He even talks about the influx of illegal immigrants as something that's been pissing folks off in places like New York. Is this the sign of a Democratic fever breaking, and them finally getting comfortable admitting obvious truths, or will he be taught a lesson?
QUICK HITS
- I wish there had been more Gaetzkeeping, truth be told. He's a bad pick:
It will be an honor to serve as President Trump's Attorney General! pic.twitter.com/dg0iQ0bA6Y
— Matt Gaetz (@mattgaetz) November 13, 2024
- Tulsi Gabbard, who years ago served as a Democratic representative in the House and has since made a name for herself as a Fox News regular/staunch war critic, will serve as the Director of National Intelligence. "I have a lot of questions," Sen. Mark Warner (D–Va.), the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, told reporters in response:
NEW: Tulsi announced as Director of National Intelligence pic.twitter.com/nIkqXyLHDf
— Sam Stein (@samstein) November 13, 2024
- The word backlash is used so many times here:
I now understand better why Donald Trump is the popular vote winner. pic.twitter.com/RZQKn1VOwP
— Patrick Ruffini (@PatrickRuffini) November 13, 2024
- The think tanks are fighting:
Just before the election, @ManhattanInst put out a report giving Trump academic cover for mass deportation, saying it'll cut debt. Today @CatoInstitute published my response, showing MI's results are based on 9 errors. Fixing them predicts mass removal will cost $6+ trillion. https://t.co/jFR9b7ZGbM
— David J. Bier (@David_J_Bier) November 13, 2024
- An excerpt: "MI assumes new immigrants generate ZERO additional corporate income tax revenues," writes the Cato Institute's David Bier. "I doubt MI's own tax policy experts agree. Employees are hired because they produce more corporate income. Ultimately, MI excludes over $700 billion in revenue from its analysis."
- "Consumer prices rose 2.6% year-on-year in October overall and 3.3% excluding the volatile food and energy categories," reports Bloomberg. "Both figures matched the median forecasts of economists in a Bloomberg survey. The figures underscore the slow and frustrating nature of the battle against inflation, which has often moved sideways—sometimes for months at a time—on its broader path down."
- The Trump-Musk relationship is fascinating:
Elon Musk's near-constant presence at Mar-a-Lago since President-elect Trump's victory has begun to wear on people in Trump's inner circle, sources say.
"He's behaving as if he's a co-president and making sure everyone knows it," one person says. https://t.co/pF4u8SXj5c
— NBC News (@NBCNews) November 13, 2024
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The Gift of Gabbard
Trump nominates Tulsi Gabbard, who has sharply criticized Zelensky and called for dialogue with Russia, for the post of US Director of National Intelligence.
Gabbard's nomination was announced in a statement released by Trump's transition team.
- Intel Slava Z (from the land free of team Jeff MAPedo)
Zely, the gravy train is about to be over.
The left media and democrats in Congress are calling her a BRICS puppet.
Well, they're certainly shitting BRICS these days. They got any evidence or just another "trust me bro" smear? I'm assuming a smear.
It's what they do best. And reflexively.
They hate her for speaking out against the Ukraine biolabs that Rubio uncovered during the Nuland questioning.
What are the odds that some paperwork still remains showing the Biden Brand?
IT’S ALL RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION!
Which is probably why Rubio was chosen for SecState. This is an administration that’s going to uncover and remove all these covert operations.
And ending Kamala in the 2020 debate.
Shit, AOC actually called her a 'pro-war appointee'.
The Uber-libs are absolutely losing their minds. I have never laughed so hard, ever, just watching them. They (the uber-libs) look like somebody trying to push out a fart, and can't quite do it.
Let John Bolton losing his absolute shit over Tulsi Gabbard and Matt Gaetz be the wholesome and quality content you need to kick off your Thursday morning.
https://x.com/TRHLofficial/status/1857066227593629720
I love how these Uniparty turds keep telling on themselves.
Tulsi "Friend of Russia" was a shoe-in for a cabinet level position as soon as Russia Today described her as a Soviet asset on-air.
"All roads lead to Putin!!!!!!11111"
Do you think your party could have won if it based the entire campaign on rehashing #RussiaGate?
I can imagine the DNC operatives deciding which memes to push, and choosing "garbage" and "joy" over "Russia, Russia, Russia".
Russia Today from the land free of team Pluggo MAPedo.
Hey, what happened to your original account? Shrinkflation?
Also, the Soviet Union was dissolved in 1991 when Gabbard was ten years old. Wouldn’t you like to go back to that time?
Would you care to explain to the commentariat how you managed to get your original account nuked here?
Tulsi is far less a “Friend of Russia” and a Soviet asset than you are, Tailgunner Joe.
Nobody buys your bullshit, pedo.
Reminder that Putin endorsed Kamala.
Putin likes Kamala’s contagious laugh.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
All the abolish articles made me think it was April fools day.
Wtf? Do they think anyone’s going to read all that?
They do this after every election.... right?
They're getting back to libertarian roots.
Hey, let's not get carried away!
No this was their November issue of the magazine- so the entire dead tree edition was filled with these articles.
Best issue ever.
Some of them (Army, borders, NPS) didn’t even make sense.
Maybe if you’re an ancap, you might want to abolish the army and borders. As much as I believe their hearts are in the right place, I don’t believe anarcho-capitalism is a tenable political ideology.
In principle I'm an an-cap. But I don't really see a path from here to there.
Same.
My problem always comes down to property rights in an anarcho-system, and then the general administration of criminal justice.
If you abolish the government, it's up to people to defend their own property and their own personal rights. Immediately what happens after that is the people with the greatest wealth and access to resources then are most capable of protecting their own rights by hiring security. But they would also have their own interest in stability that goes beyond security, so to resolve disputes, they'd try to hire independent arbitrators. They would end up funding and building their own private court system, and then people on the outside who are seeking remedies or recompense for injustices (violence, property damage) end up having to appeal to this privately funded system for the opportunity to have their court system hear the case and then enforce whatever penalties.
So it ends up just reverting to a feudal system, with local powerful lords essentially replacing the government. You pay into a protection scheme of sorts that's essentially just the government all over again. And if you're going to do that, you might as well create your own constitution with your own bill of rights, and then what's the difference between government and where you ended up?
Takes longer to get to the rampant official theft and graft stage that way?
I agree that something like a government is probably inevitable. But I don't put government in a separate category from feudal lordship or rule by organized crime gangs.
Are you thinking of the old NPS or the new woke NPS? Cuz the current agency just wants to own more land, and then keep people out of it, while promoting DEI (specifically convincing target urban populations to go camping--the woodsy kind, not the highway overpass kind).
The old NPS, which is what the administration needs to get them back to being.
There is also urban underpass camping.
Well, the constitution does prohibit having a standing army. Not sure how they get around that one because it sure looks like we have a standing army.
Technically they re-establish it every 2 years.
So getting by on a technicality. Doesn't exactly seem in keeping with the intent or spirit of the law. How come conservative constitutionalist commentators never bring this up? Maybe we do need a standing army. If so, then the constitution can be amended.
the constitution does prohibit having a standing army
What makes you say that? Maybe it should be unconstitutional, I wouldn't argue that, but I read the clause below to limit only to 2 year at a time funding.
The Congress shall have Power...To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
Hmm. I guess I'm misremembering what the text of the constitution actually says. I'm probably thinking of some of the contemporary commentaries.
However, the time for supporting a navy is indefinite.
I'm thinking the framers' logic here was that if a president goes all Caesar, Congress could reel it in after a max of 2 years. The Navy on the other hand, well before planes and missiles they weren't much threat to the domestic population.
And ships are a big investment that need to be maintained and can't be raised in a big hurry like an army. Navy was, and is, also important for defending trade routes, fighting pirates and stuff like that. Army is really just for war (or that's the idea anyway).
All good points.
All NPS land should be sold to the states they’re located in or to citizens.
The sad thing is - they could write 100 more articles like that.
Well...are there more Abolish articles or JD Vance is Wrong over the last two month span?
JD Vance is wrong about abolishing stuff.
Greta Support a Shell of Its Former Self
Oil giant wins case against climate activists
British energy major Shell has won an appeal against a Dutch climate ruling ordering it to significantly cut greenhouse emissions.
- Russia Today (from the land free of team Jeff MAPedo)
How dare you!
They beat her at the shell game.
This could fuel more climate cultist protests.
Oil bet the protests get even rowdier.
The protesters will cry Wawa when there’s pushback.
All those tears could stain their Sheetz
They could organize using an app on their Mobil devices.
It would turn into a marathon protest.
If only we could return to a national Standard.
Would there be a Gulf between the protesters?
Not so long as they have a functioning pipeline.
A virtual Speedway to get them to the protest site.
Ready, cit go.
Protesters need to do it legally by putting their Exxon the dotted line and getting a permit.
This shows that between the oil producers and the regulators, there's a wide gulf.
This comment powered by frozen windmills.
I was out of gas.
Eat more beans (and then fart in a jar).
I unmuted the grey box to see what he said and wasn't disappointed.
You have DLAM muted?
Yeah, I was wondering at that too.
It also could be a running joke between Jesse and DLAM to mock sarc for constantly announcing his muting and unmuting of commenters.
I’m inclined to believe it to be a running joke on how Sarc claims to mute/unmute people yet doesn’t actually mute anyone.
It is a running joke after DLAM mocked me for being off sarcs list =(
But I am officially the mean girl ambassador.
STOP PEEKING IN MY GREY BOX!
If only they had beat her in the squid games.
Eh, so?
When did CNN loose intrest in Greta thornburg?
When she turned 18
Just like Jeffy and Shrike.
How dare you?
Well of course. Her whole shtick was to get up on stage so her followers could cry "from the mouth of babes!" and throw money at whatever environmental organization she was shilling at the time.
Yeah, she could be cute and endearing (to people who buy her bullshit) as a kid. Now she's just an ugly, angry adult.
I was worried Liz’s article was going to be “Abolish the comment section.”
I think that we can all agree the cunts that wrote abolish artical, and said they would vote for chass or kamala need to take a long walk off a short pier. They are all the lowest most vial hypocritical scum. They spent all of their time trashing the one candidate that wanted to minimize the gov, now they call to abisb things? Fuck off and die.
They are being conveniently libertarian post Trump victory akin to open borders supporters that will die on every hill to protect the welfare state attracting many of the illegals to the US.
They don’t want to be put in those camps.
Who doesn't love camping, though?
But the best campsites under the freeway go fast.
Unless the DNC is coming to town and the mayor wants to look good for them.
Leave sarc out of this.
Except if you read them, they're not Libertarian in the slightest beyond the headline.
Hey now. They also demand open borders. Yet no abolish welfare article.
Yep. I'll support opening the border one minute after the welfare state is eliminated. Otherwise, I advocate NOT importing poverty.
Also not the open boards traitors do not fund immigrants with their own money or housing.
Virtue signaling is expensive so it needs to be subsidized by taxpayers.
Spending other people's money is what makes it virtuous.
Other people's money is the easiest to spend.
They are all the lowest most vial hypocritical scum.
vials of scum? no thank you.
You’d prefer barrels?
Xcellent
Liberal newspaper accuses Musk of ‘racism’ and quits X
The Guardian will shut down its 80 accounts on X in response to the supposed spread of “conspiracy theories and racism”.
- Russia Today (from the land free of team Jeff MAPedo)
80 fewer propaganda accounts is a good thing. Guess The Guardian does not like African Americans. How diverse.
The guardian hates African 'mericans
Okay, byeeeeee.
Is there a British equivalent for Mastodon?
They decided X was an airport so they announced their departure.
Is that like vegans announcing there is nothing to eat, after sitting down to a group dinner?
So they bought all those blue check marks for nothing?!?
Again we see the left's expectation and demand that platforms be biased in their favor. When they are not they claim it is "unfair". Tellingly none of the X-quitters cared a whit when Twitter was censoring their enemies, to them that was just the normal and appropriate course. Now that they have to compete on ideas they run off rather than prove they cannot.
The cato istitue is full of globalist socialists that have, since 2015, bee lying and cherry picking data, expecially when it come to immigration. The 6 trillion figure is pulled right out of their collective asses.
plus it assumes we are exporting everyone not just the illegals the illegals are not running our universities or corporations or inventing anything of value. note they also assume we will no longer allow immigrants to pick crops when in Trumps first term he increased the number of allowed seasonal workers.
It also assumes there are no other workers.
Diversity Calling A Spade A Spade
Ukraine demands that African bloc denounce official’s ‘genocide’ remarks
Kiev wants ECOWAS to disavow Commissioner Abdel-Fatau Musah for calling Ukraine’s actions in Donbass a genocide.
- Russia Today (from the land free of team Jeff MAPedo)
Unipolar anti-diversity whining about being called out for genocide. Maybe team unipolar shouldn’t have conducted genocide. FFS.
Lol, you're right up there with Hamas propaganda. Maybe you and mtrueman can start a podcast.
Thank you Lindsey Graham’s mouthpiece. I appreciate the comments.
Stop genociding* me, bro. You're the one who spams the board with bs government propaganda, not me.
*did I use that right, the word has become meaningless lately the way it gets lopped around?
Frequently a Great Notion, had the US not engaged in color revolutions there dating back near a decade now the genocide in Donbass would not have been committed. The OP was regarding an African official calling it out.
I share news from folks in the area and not some shit like Black Rifle Coffee’s take or ignorant and MIC funded MSM.
Also, Supreme Leader Putin pays me 50 kopeks per post.
I share news from folks in the area and not
So this is a quote from the ecowas official, "Unipolar anti-diversity whining about being called out for genocide. Maybe team unipolar shouldn’t have conducted genocide. FFS."?
If so my apologies. If not then no you didn't just post a story, you commented on it. Your comentary was as stupid as mtrueman's claims that Israel is committing genocide. I said as much and stand by it.
The italics are the quoted story. The regular text is me expanding on the story.
Yup, Chumby is basically a Putin apologist at this point.
I pointed out yesterday that many conservatives are gravitating towards a Putin-like approach to governance because of what Putin did: he took a large diverse country and created a cultural homogeneity where traditional values are just considered the norm and totally uncontroversial. Minority views are not even presented in public - do they even have Pride parades in Moscow? Oh, wouldn't it be great in this country if "normal people" were overwhelmingly considered the normative standard and everyone else understood that they were wrong and inferior compared to the prevailing cultural standard?
Nope, no Pride parades in Moscow.
Gay parades banned in Moscow for 100 years
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-19293465
Wouldn't that be dreamy here in the US?
This is to protect the gays from being drone strike murdered by the bandera hohols that insist on attacking Russian citizens with their implements of war not unlike when Biden (D) drone strike murdered those children and aid worker in Afghanistan.
I am not surprised in the least that you are in favor of government force to prevent freedom of association of the people that you hate.
Can I crap on a Rainbow crosswalk?
Cite missing where I hate gay people. Please stop lying. It makes you look rather stupid.
You’ll get fee sarcophants to whatever issues you are supporting by being you.
Lying Jeffy lies. It’s what he does.
Oh, my mistake. Let me rephrase it:
I am not surprised in the least that you are in favor of government force to prevent freedom of association of the people that you
hatemerely dislike.Does that make everything okay now?
Your big complaint, wasn't about the mass deprivation of liberty that banning a parade for 100 years represents, but that the deprivation of liberty wasn't motivated by literal hatred?
Nope. Learn about culture, then learn about Russia, then consider rewriting your post into something better. You might need a few years. Thanks.
Dude, you're a bigger propagandist then he is.
A propagandist for liberty, you are right. I won't apologize for that.
Do you even smell the bullshit you shovel? A propagandist for liberty, my ass. You, Jeffy, who advocated for mandatory masks and compared them to trunk bears. You, Jeffy, who advocated for mandatory vaccination. You, Jeffy, who advocates for censorship here routinely. You’re about as anti-liberty as they get here.
To be fair, Jeff is probably retarded.
No, he’s a psychopathic liar.
This. Jeff knows full well that he's telling lies and he does it on purpose.
I never advocated for government mandates for masks or vaccines, you asshole. Never. Not once. I dare you to find any time where I did.
But this is the same shit that you pulled on Chase. He didn’t advocate for those things either. But you and your team claim he did, because you project your caricature of a left-wing progressive onto him.
It is stupid black/white binary thinking. "If he is outside my tribe, that means he belongs to the other tribe and advocates for all the things that the other tribe advocates."
Ah yes, Mr. Trunk Bears wants to change what he originally said.
A person who drives around with a bear in the trunk of their car which then gets out and mauls someone was Jeff the chemist's metaphor in support of his claim that people who refused to be vaccinated and went in public were violating the NAP. While he didn't technically advocate for masks and vaccines, what he actually advocated for was an illegal quarantine of people who were not sick "to protect the public from their aggression". Which is categorically an even more vile position.
Shut the fuck up, you lying shitweasel
You on the other hand are just a mindless drone for Team Red. What original thought do yo have around here? Where do YOU stand up for liberty - actual liberty, not the Team Red social conservative version of it?
Do you defend the liberty of parents to take their kids to drag queen story hour?
Do you defend the liberty of parents to decide what is best for health care for their own kids, without you or the other moral scolds dictating to them?
Do you defend the liberty of anyone to VOLUNTARILY wear masks in the middle of a pandemic if they so choose? Do you defend the liberty of private property owners to choose to require that guests wear masks on their property?
That's a rather specific and therefore revealing list of "liberties". Note how small they are.
Meanwhile the left has actual censorship and political retribution campaigns ongoing for years without making his list of concerns. Priorities are important.
Lying Jeffy just wants to fuck kids.
It is without question that jeffy defends the right to groom.
It is a list of liberties that right-wingers tend to object to. I made no claim about their relative importance vis a vis all possible liberties. That was you projecting your bias onto me. You like to do that a lot, project a stereotype in your head against the people you dislike. Why it's as if your entire schtick here is arguing against strawmen aka the voices in your head.
Yes, we know you think kids should be permanently crippled with puberty blockers and encouraged to undergo radical surgery on their genitals in service to the queer cult of self-mortification.
Notice how RRWP's concern here isn't about what's best for the children, but about what ideology is supposedly served. If kids are harmed but in the service of the "correct" ideology that is okay with him.
I made no claim about their relative importance vis a vis all possible liberties.
And yet we see what you attack people based on and what you don't. You can pretend that's happenstance but we all know it isn't. Some things motivate you to attack while other don't, and this distinction perfectly matches "attack the right, defend the left".
It's not a coincidence and the more you insist it is the more credibility you lose.
Notice how RRWP’s concern here isn’t about what’s best for the children
Notice how chemtard thinks that crippling puberty blockers and radical surgical procedures on children is okay as long as it supports the revolution.
“project a stereotype in your head against the people you dislike.”
Project? Mother fucker half of your posts are about the topic.
Except that it isn’t parents deciding on drag queen story hour or deciding what is best for kids’ health care, it’s the school, and by extension, the government, especially in places like California. Those aren’t parents making those decisions there, dip.
Yeah, chemtard is fine with schools going behind parents backs to encourage gender dysphoria because the schools are run by "experts," and anything supported by "experts" is automatically correct.
and anything supported by “experts” is automatically correct.
Lobotomies worked so well cutting off other parts is just the next step to paradise.
It's just more liberationist twaddle. "Anything which doesn't allow me to say or do whatever I want is oppressing me!" It's why these freaks go into full-blown meltdowns when real life doesn't turn out like their fairy tale stories.
He defended shooting babbit because she was trespassing. Jeff is a Marxist authoritarian.
A MAPedo authoritarian. All roads lead to the same destination.
Cripes, when Chemjeff swings in to 'help' you know that you fucked up somewhere, Great Notion.
I don't know where, but you might have to fumigate your posts.
Yup. I am disagreeing with SAGN on this, probably close to diametrically opposed, and I feel bad for him.
Correct. I am an agent of the FSB that is paid 50 kopeks per post on websites and social media sites to further the Russian agenda.
You actually get paid? I'm still getting tins of salted fish in the mail.
Putin likes puns. What else can I say?
I've Red that somewhere.
You charge him a ussry fee don't you.
Let’s not be russian to conclusions.
he took a large diverse country and created a cultural homogeneity where traditional values are just considered the norm and totally uncontroversial.
This is a hilarious take considering I was listening to a podcast last night talking about how progressives see any return to traditionalist norms, no matter how small, as an existential threat.
Jeff thinks Russia culturally homogeneous. What a retard. A land mass on two continents with many times zones, several dozen languages. He understands neither culture nor Russia. The biggest common cultural identity they have is repeated western aggression from Napoleon during the first patriotic war, then France-England aggression into Crimea, Kaiser Bill declaring war in 1914, then that Austrian painter in the 1940s. And now with color revolution after color revolution on her doorstep. Don’t poke the bear.
Evidently, egalitarianism still holds you by the balls.
So, whatever personal grudge or sperg dunk (Am I using that term correctly?) you’re trying to perpetrate aside, you’re taking the side that ECOWAS should disavow Abdela-Fatau Musah because Ukraine took offense to the use of the term genocide even if it was used inappropriately?
I don’t know that I have any particular dog in this fight, but I do want to be clear that that’s the dog your'e backing.
You paid attention in RMac’s class.
I am stealing the sperg dunk. I am going to print that out and share it at work.
Lol, wondered if anyone read that. That guy is a very interesting follow.
I read it and thought about sperg dunking on it. 🙂
I wish there had been more Gaetzkeeping, truth be told. He's a bad pick:
Actually curious if anyone can say why he is a bad pick. So far it gas been Nonsensical diatribes without actual reason. Even the known DoJ claim is largely built off lawfare. Thr initial accuser was blackmailing his dad. DoJ dropped the case due to no evidence.
Why is he a bad pick?
Well going by Biden qualification standards, he lacks qualification because he's not a fag
Or corrupt as hell like the current AG.
Why is he a bad pick?
He’s GOP and he likes Trump.
That’s all you need to know.
He wants to massively cut government. He wants to stop the lawfare. He wants to hold government accountable.
Ahh. It's those last 2 things.
So unlibertarian.
Watched Tim Pool last night and someone pointed out that Trump appointed him and Tulsi to direct the organizations that targeted them. Pretty good indication of what’s to come.
He's a walking scandal magnet.
But do proceed, go ahead and recess appoint him to a post where he is totally over his head, and then when he proceeds to embarrass himself and your whole team, I will enjoy seeing you try to defend the indefensible.
I’m betting you will have gone insane before that happens.
"He’s a walking scandal magnet."
Jeffy's pulling a Rules for Radicals trick here. Make a whole bunch of false, unprovable accusations against a target, and then infer that they're too controversial and compromised.
Make a whole bunch of false, unprovable accusations against a target
that’s you
you are a completely in the bag Trump cultist at this point
Woosh!
We just caught you in action, fifty-center. "NO U!!" isn't the riposte you think it is.
Notice. For Jeff it is the woman's fault for wearing the skirt, not the leftists faults for creating false scandals and lawfare about everything.
Does the woman have a penis? And can we somehow blame Putin?
Could it get as bad as you defending Joe Biden? I think not.
So, this is where you don't address the substance of my claim and just attack me. Isn't that something that you are personally offended by?
LOL! "Substance" of your claim, "He’s a walking scandal magnet" while failing to list a single scandal.
Keep 'em coming, kid. My sides are splitting.
Hey, he also said he was in over his head. Can’t argue with that!
Why would you say that? Pointing out your propaganda has always been one of my contributions to the board.
But you didn’t “point out my propaganda”. You just attacked me. You didn’t even try to argue how my claims were either true or false. You’re just another ‘pwn the lib’ shit-talking right-wing troll, on par with Jesse and ML.
So in Marshal's world, just launching personal attacks counts as "pointing out propaganda" and represents a valuable contribution to the board. But if I or sarc were to, say, insult another commenter, that is dragging down the tenor of the board and Marshal is 'personally offended' by it.
Looks like you are the one who has a hard time following a consistent standard.
It looks like we'll have to add propaganda to the list of subjects you don't understand. Applying different standards to different groups and distracting attention away from allies and onto enemies is propaganda.
That fucker understands propaganda just fine as he spreads enough of that shit here.
I think he just does it naturally. Like masturbation you don't need to understand how it works to give it a shot.
I’m really not being hyperbolic when I call him a psychopath.
Applying different standards to different groups and distracting attention away from allies and onto enemies is propaganda.
Again, this is what YOU DO. You claim to be 'personally offended' when I don't act like a pure saint, yet you say absolutely nothing about the garbage filth nominally associated with your team.
How about projection? Is that 'propaganda' too? Because you are definitely good at that.
You must be an RMac sock. He pulled similar shit before I put him on ignore. He would criticize me for the pettiest of things, like petty grammar shit, while he said absolutely nothing about his allies outright lying. Nardz can advocate for literal murder against the people he disagrees with, Misek can advocate for Holocaust Part 2, but somehow *I* am the problem. You're a clown. You're just another shit-talking right-wing troll. You're Jesse with better grammar.
In the current discussion, YOU are the one distracting attention away from allies (Matt Gaetz) and onto enemies (Biden). YOU are the one who derailed this entire conversation to turn it into a gripefest directed at me personally. You're trash. Go away.
Your entire sc
Again, this is what YOU DO. You claim to be ‘personally offended’ when I don’t act like a pure saint, yet you say absolutely nothing about the garbage filth nominally associated with your team.
I said I'm personally offended you lie about what you are because it suggests we're too stupid to see through your cosplay. As far as I can tell no one on the right is pretending not to be. This is true of the openly left wing commenters as well who I also don't bother with. It's revealing you replaced my specific complaint with your own inaccurate generality because you know the correct statement doesn't make your point.
And why do you keep asserting my "team"? Haven't you railed against that consistently only to turn around and do it to others? Typical that even while claiming you're merely imperfect you continue every stupid tactic you're ever thought of.
You’re Jesse with better grammar.
I do try to be clear so it's nice people notice.
In the current discussion, YOU are the one distracting attention away from allies (Matt Gaetz) and onto enemies (Biden).
Don't be silly, you're not part of the discussion. You're the comedy relief.
I said I’m personally offended you lie about what you are
But I don’t lie about who I am. YOU lie about who I am because you project your caricature onto me.
And you are even lying about your original ‘personally offended’ comment. Here is what you wrote:
https://reason.com/2024/11/08/smoking-the-copium/?comments=true#comment-10793477
I’m personally offended by people who ruin the board for everyone while preening that they desire better.
So just about everything you write is a lie. You lie about who I am, you lie about what I believe, you lie about your own statements. What ARE you truthful about? Not much, apparently.
As far as I can tell no one on the right is pretending not to be.
YOU ARE. You are pretending to be some guy who is ‘personally offended’ by some bad behavior when in reality you deliberately provoke people and then turn around and disingenuously criticize them for bad behavior when they respond in kind. It is a sick little trolling game, nothing more.
Don’t be silly, you’re not part of the discussion. You’re the comedy relief.
Well, this just sums up the whole thing, doesn’t it? You deliberately twisted the conversation into a series of personal attacks on me, while revealing that your whole ‘personally offended’ schtick was completely fake – you are not offended by bad behavior here, you are part of the problem. YOU are part of the problem making the board worse off. This place would be much better if you would stop deliberately provoking people, if you would stop projecting onto the people you dislike the caricature in your head, and actually listen to them and engage in a conversation with them. YOU are the problem here, not me.
Oh, go blow, you fucking blowhard. No one is lying about who you are here, Jack. They’re using your own words that you yourself typed (banged?) onto your own keyboard with your own fat ass fingers.
You get personal attacks because you are a hypocrite who attacks others. Again, fuck off on that.
But I don’t lie about who I am.
If you were truthful you wouldn't have to use double standards to support your positions. Today you're claiming that circumventing rules makes Trump a dictator. But when Obama more clearly violated parliamentary rules to pass much more consequential legislation you had exactly zero complaints. So not only is Trump a dictator, a worse violation merits nothing at all. So we can see you don't care about governmental rules, you just hope someone else will accept your framing to put an extra notch down against Trump.
you project your caricature onto me.
We both know this is a lie. I test your claims and you are completely unable to show you have ever applied any of the principles you claim to base your decisions on to any leftist. If you were what you claimed to be you would do that repeatedly even without prompting.
if you would stop deliberately provoking people, if you would stop projecting onto the people you dislike the caricature in your head,
Sucks when people treat you like you treat them doesn't it? Maybe you should think what that says about you. The person you're pretending to be would have thought of that himself though.
“…..left wing commenters as well who I also don’t bother with.”
Yeah, there are several of us here that mostly just go after the worst of the worst and we all go after mr bears in trunks.
You’d think this would spark some self reflection, but no….
He’s a walking scandal magnet.
But do proceed, go ahead and recess appoint him to a post where he is totally over his head, and then when he proceeds to embarrass himself and your whole team, I will enjoy seeing you try to defend the indefensible.
Is this like when, shortly before the election, you were bragging about how sweet it will be when the awesome LP candidate is going to get so many votes that he'll swing the election to Kamala and you would be enjoying the tears or all the Trump voters here?
JD Vance
@JDVance
The main issue with Matt Gaetz is that he used his office to prosecute his political opponents and authorized federal agents to harass parents who were peacefully protesting at school board meetings.
Oh wait, that's actually Merrick Garland, the current attorney general.
7:51 PM · Nov 13, 2024
But that's OK, because they did it first.
/Jeff and Sarc
So you're saying JD Vance was wrong about Gaetz?
I have no opinion about Gaetz. I like JD's comment pointing out those who pretend to be worried about lawfare are not actually opposed to lawfare except against themselves, but I didn't want to take credit for the comment.
Gaetz has never prosecuted a case nor defended one (if you don't count his own DOJ investigation which never led to charges). He went to an okay law school but not great but that doesn't really matter as to his qualifications. He practiced law for approx 3 years in FL before becoming a FL state rep then became US Congressman.
So to sum up; he has 3 years experience practicing law none of which is particularly relevant to leading the federal government's Dept of Justice... has a penchant for cocaine and underage escorts ...looks like a grown up fatter version of Butthead from Beavis and Butthead...is a bomb thrower that personally derailed most of a session of Congress when the GOP held the house... anything else you would like to know? He cheerleads for Trump.
On the bright side, he is the Ted Cruz of the house. Hated by all, respected by few. But did I mention he is a big cheerleader for Daddy Trump and is also from Florida? That is his biggest qualification. He is Florida man personified into a congressman. Alleged that he hates government but spent almost all of his adult life sucking from the taxpayers tit in his cushy govt jobs.
Nobody believes you’re an attorney.
What law school did you go to?
William & Mary Law School is ranked 36th in the nation.
Curiously, I don't recall you saying that Kamala, whose political career arose out of her being a lawyer and then D.A. was unqualified to be a District Attorney, much less President of the United States. Her law school is ranked 82nd.
My personal misgivings are that he is too partisan and too aggressive for a position that should be apolitical. In reality, that's par for the course considering other recent occupants of the position.
On the other side, we have someone motivated to attack the corrupt officials in government and to prosecute the actual crimes the DOJ should be going after. If he can stay disciplined, then he is a good choice who will rain hell on those who deserve it.
Gaetzkeeping
I don't see him getting through confirmation hearings, and he has resigned his House seat. Seems like maybe he was rope-a-doped to the sidelines, while Trump can say "Hey I nominated you, like I said I would...it's not my fault you screwed up your confirmation. And it's too bad DeSantis has already filled your House seat...What will you do next? ".
If he doesn’t get confirmed, the insider baseball is he would take Rubio’s senate seat.
I'll be surprised if that happens. From what I understand, he and DeSantis don't like each other that much.
Gaetz is primarily being nominated for this becuase he's been a Trump guy from the very beginning. He probably wouldn't be any worse than his Y2K predecessors, but that's a low bar to clear. He's definitely not the person I would have picked.
Epic.
They are talking recess appointments for these picks. They have basically 2 years. They are going around the uniparty if they need to.
I love how Jesse confirms the left-wing stereotype against his team by demanding that Trump act like a dictator against even the wishes of a Republican Congress.
You do understand how recess appointments work, right, as they’re defined in the Constitution?
The Constitution also permits the president to suspend habeas corpus. In either case, it would be the president “acting like a dictator” even if the Constitution authorizes it.
It is cute that you think “constitutional” is synonymous with “correct”.
But I will be happy to put you down as well for supporting Trump act like a dictator even against the wishes of a Republican Senate. Trump uber alles, amirite?
Again, recess appointments are allowed as the Senate is not always in session. Article II, Section 2, Clause 3.
“The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.”
As for the suspension of habeas corpus, that’s under Article I, Section 9, Clauses 2 and 3. It can only be suspended “when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.” Even SCOTUS (1866) determined that you cannot use military tribunals in states that uphold the authority of the Constitution and where civilian courts operate (Ex parte Milligan).
Your whole premise is retarded, Jeffy.
constitutional =/= correct
Bunk. If it’s constitutional, then it’s the correct way to do things. Try reading it sometime instead of using it for toilet paper.
And that's how we know you're a right-winger and not a libertarian.
A right-winger worships the Constitution as if it were holy writ.
A libertarian understands that what is most important is liberty, not the Constitution.
No, asshole, it’s how we know you’re an unprincipled libertine and not libertarian nor classical liberal in the least. You seem to be of the opinion that the Constitution is irrelevant and thus you’re no different than a lot of Democrats and communists out there. This document is how we run our government, whether you like it or not. Fuck off, you retarded, lying, pettifogging, obfuscating, dipshitty son of a bitch.
Lying Jeffy’s on record being against equal protection under the law.
Also, how does libertarianism have more to do with government processes of appointments?
These are the rules we have used for almost 250 years, but Jeff has an issue with them because he thinks ha is smarter than the founding fathers. Holy crap.
You seem to be of the opinion that the Constitution is irrelevant
Not correct. The Constitution is not ‘irrelevant’. It is simply not always correct when it comes to liberty. Knock it off with the simplistic black/white thinking – either one must adore the Constitution or one must throw it away. Neither is correct.
This document is how we run our government, whether you like it or not.
I'm well aware of that. What does that have to do with anything? Are you saying that if the Constitution permits the government to do X, then X automatically becomes morally justified?
And yes, you are a right-winger and not a libertarian on the matter.
Jeffy, defending the Constitution is not being a right-winger. If anything, it’s one of the most libertarian documents ever created. Your ideas of “liberty” are rather twisted and are more libertine than libertarian or even classically liberal.
Jeff seems to be in a bad mood today and now making own goals. It is like there recently was a potus election and Donald Trump won. Weird.
Bullshit, chemjeff. You bitch about following the law and how Trump is a dictator, but when the law stands in the way of what you want, your position, you gladly ignore the law. Case in point, you telling me that it's fine for illegals to enter the U.S. illegally, since it's just too hard to do so legally. You discard the law at your whim, but then try to concern troll when Trump might do something that's not even illegal, and is, in fact, constitutional.
Obama made recess appointments even when congress was holding pro-forma sessions and I don't recall Jeffsarc or any other leftists referring to Obama as a dictator or implying he's a Nazi.
Are we to understand this is yet another standard applied only to Trump but never to left wing allies? Will Jeffsarc ever apply a single standard uniformly?
Jeffsarc apply a consistent standard? Surely you must be joking.
I was not even commenting here consistently at that time, so that is bad faith concern trolling on your part. Yes Obama was acting like a dictator when he was trying to do his recess appointments, in his case unconstitutionally.
Will you admit that trying to make executive appointments in defiance of the Senate is a dictatorial approach, no matter if it’s Obama or Trump?
Oh and by the way, will you admit that you are making this comment board a worse place by insulting people and dragging down the tenor of this place?
I was not even commenting here consistently at that time, so that is bad faith concern trolling on your part.
Surely you have something to show us right? Just because you didn't comment you still had thoughts?
Will you admit that trying to make executive appointments in defiance of the Senate is a dictatorial approach,
Of course not this is just your typical hyperbole, or to be more accurate it's you cosplaying along with the other idiots because you don't have any important work in your life. You wouldn't know dictatorial if it bit you in the ass. You know what was discatorial? Obama strong-arming the house rules official into allowing Obamacare to pass under rules applying only to budgets. But as we see above you don't give a shit about "dictatorial" powers, to you it's just a random word useful to attack the enemy in this moment.
will you admit that you are making this comment board a worse place by insulting people and dragging down the tenor of this place?
Mocking the guy here only to be an asshole to everyone else certainly brings up the tenor of the place.
So filling the board up with lots of back-and-forth comments full of insults makes the board a better place? Really?
Maybe, the word 'dictatorial' means 'acting like a dictator' and it can apply to many different people in many different contexts, including both Obama and Trump. Huh, whaddya know!
Will you admit you lie all the time, Lying Jeffy?
Would it be defiance of the Senate if the Senate intentionally recesses specifically to allow recess appointments?
But that is silly. If the Senate has the votes to go into recess, then the Senate has the votes to confirm the appointments in question.
That’s at the discretion of the Senate. SCOTUS has even ruled on that.
Keep going Lying Jeffy! You’re doing great!
It's better than when Obama tried to make recess appointments when the Senate had expressly said they are not in recess. And had to be slapped down by SCOTUS:
Justice Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court, joined by Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan. Breyer, writing for the Court, stated, "We hold that, for purposes of the Recess Appointments Clause, the Senate is in session when it says it is, provided that, under its own rules, it retains the capacity to transact Senate business."
Justice Scalia wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment, joined by Chief Justice Roberts, Thomas, and Alito. While it agreed with the conclusion the Court reached, the concurrence chastises the majority opinion for ensuring "that recess appointments will remain a powerful weapon in the President's arsenal. ... That is unfortunate, because the recess appointment power is an anachronism."
Scalia also argued that the recess appointment power only applies to vacancies that *arise* *while* the Senate is in recess, and not merely openings that President's try to strategically hold unfilled until a recess occurs (the former is an unfortunate circumstance that may require an unusual response, the later is gaming the system).
It's not dictatorial OR against the will of the Senate when the Senate intentionally recesses to allow the appointments.
"Sen John Thune, who was chosen majority leader, agreed to use recess appointments to fill the posts quickly.
https://x.com/SenJohnThune/status/1855722302568300794
We must act quickly and decisively to get the president’s nominees in place as soon as possible, & all options are on the table to make that happen, including recess appointments. We cannot let Schumer and Senate Dems block the will of the American people.
This is posturing and silly. If the Senate is unable to get a nominee through the confirmation process, it wouldn't be Schumer's fault, it would be Republicans' fault.
Moving the goalposts...first it was "dictatorial" and "against the will of Congress".
Now you're arguing it's a silly procedural move. Keep moving them...
See the comment by Massie below.
Gaetz will get to play during recess. The game he has in mind is US invasion forces in 2003 versus Polish defense forces in 1939.
He resigned his house seat so the house ethics committee report/investigation into his hookers and blow parties will be stopped. Because they were going to kick him out anyway. Now the house ethics committee has lost jurisdiction because he is no longer a house member. The vote to release a report of their findings was due to be held tomorrow 11/15/24. Coincidental timing of his resignation I am sure.
Wrong. He did it right away because it means his replacement will be in place by the time congress is back in session.
Florida requirements on filling vacancies is 8 weeks. Stepping down now means they can have a replacement Jan 3rd.
There is zero evidence for your claims. The initial claims were made by someone blackmailing Gaetz father for money. They were charged.
Are you sure you're a lawyer?
No. But he did blow a trucker outside of a Holiday Inn Express.
Does this mean Tulsi Gabbard stops getting followed by air marshals on commercial flights?
For the next four years.
The IC will take over.
No, it just means she gets introduced to them.
If I were an air marshal I'd prefer walking behind Tulsi's behind to any other assignment.
What about pat-downs?
You have to pat down the push ups.
The Polymarket story: they warned us that if Trump was elected the government would punish its political enemies. Wait, the Democrats are still in charge of the executive branch until January and they are going after their enemies? Nevermind.
if Trump was elected the government would punish its political enemies.
You ain’t seen nothing yet… I mean, we didn’t see any such thing the first time… But trust us, this time will be a bloodbath (just like he was calling for!).
Point of order: Trump didn't "call for" a bloodbath, he predicted one.
Even Snopes agrees: "The context of the remark suggests Trump was predicting an "economic bloodbath" for the country, not a literal one, if he loses the 2024 presidential election."
Sure, he said the words...
"Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a bloodbath for the whole — that's going to be the least of it, it's going to be a bloodbath for the country, that'll be the least of it."
The next sentence.... "But they're [China] not going to sell those cars" and the previous sentence was "No, we're going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you're not going to be able to sell those cars if I get elected."
To be fair, Democrats are willing to shed blood over selling cars (and just about everything else).
NO BLOOD FOR BORSCHT!
If nobody picks up on the difference between a literal bloodbath and an economic bloodbath, do you really think there will be a quibble over whether he “called” for it or “predicted” it?
That's (D)ifferent.
Talk about shooting the messenger, what a bunch of assholes.
How is Polymarket the "enemy" of Democrats?
fed raid = prima facie
Lol. This time I think Lying Jeffy really is being stupid.
The NYS government has been doing this for years to no criticism from those currently hyperventilating about it. They only care if Trump does it back, you see left wingers are good people so we can accept them doing it to others.
NYS government keeps murdering pet squirrels there will be a reckoning.
Don’t Bet On It
FBI seizes Polymarket CEO’s phone, electronics after betting platform predicts Trump win: source.
https://nypost.com/2024/11/13/business/fbi-seizes-polymarket-ceos-phone-electronics-after-betting-platform-predicts-trump-win-source/
- Bellum Acta
The machine will not go quietly as Machiavelli predicted.
Will it be televised?
Maybe not, but it will be tweeted.
Remember when the FBI made a big in public deal about seizing the my pillow guys phone while he was at a resturant, they could have done that in the privacy of his home. haven't heard a thing since which shows that was pure lawfare to scare Mike Lindell into shutting up and make an example of him so others won't look to closely.
And the great defenders of liberty, Lying Jeffy, Mike Liarson, and sarc, treated it like a joke because he’s not in their tribe.
I’m glad those clowns have double standards because otherwise they’d have no standards at all.
You can still get MyPillows on Amazon, and I think the company itself even offering a deal right now to get one for $20 on its website.
Losing the Walmart and Bed, Bath, and Beyond contracts really nuked his business income, but ironically MyPillow is still humming while BB&B is now bankrupt and defunct.
Polymarket story is just insane. I guess every voter went " well polymarket says Trump is going to win, I better vote for him".
Like if enough people bet on something it's definitely going to happen. Sports betting odds change all the time on big bets.
The question is will the machine be able to do something in the next 2 months before Trump gets in
Does Polymarket have a wager on that?
For a short period after 9/11, there was a market for predicting new terror attacks. It got the kibosh due to the macabre optics of it.
An excerpt: "MI assumes new immigrants generate ZERO additional corporate income tax revenues," writes the Cato Institute's David Bier. "I doubt MI's own tax policy experts agree. Employees are hired because they produce more corporate income. Ultimately, MI excludes over $700 billion in revenue from its analysis."
This is a weird, but consistent, bad take from CATO. This assumes this revenue would be lost if not for immigrants, a really bad assumption. It makes this assumption despite adding any welfare costs to citizens who lose jobs to citizens. So count the one side but not the other side.
This is the usual trick by open borders acolytes, which CATO has become, to ignore all costs but use third and forth order benefits.
CATO would also have to take into account costs to schools, hospitals, roads, etc if it wants to play this secondary or tertiary benefit game. But they won't.
Cato has become a global homo shell of itself. It's the reason I stopped giving them money. I saw the writing on the wall in 2014, then when their tds kicked in you knew they were toast. The fact that anyone quotes them after endorsing the jab shows how stupid people are
I noticed around 2010. But agree.
If you look at some of their writers and analysts, many come from the far left. They have largely been captured.
Like the Marxists told us they would.
Looks like soros started speaking and funding CATO in 2011.
I remember Cato from living in a guest house during the OJ trial.
Ouch.
Did you hear a thump on the wall?
I remember Cato getting their ass kicked by Inspector Clouseau right before he hits himself in the face with the double-hinged door.
That little yellow guy is showing some marked improvement.
Youngsters! Cato was the Green Hornet's muscle.
Thought that was the green gnat.
Elon Musk’s near-constant presence at Mar-a-Lago since President-elect Trump’s victory has begun to wear on people in Trump’s inner circle, sources say.
“He’s behaving as if he’s a co-president and making sure everyone knows it,” one person says.
Anonymous sources complain to dem media about negative effects of Musk.
I heard the CEO of Mastodon has already started preparing for an eventual takeover as Trump’s bestie.
This^.
Can't hate the media nearly enough.
You may think that you hate them enough, but you never actually do.
its Bannon 2.0, they did the same thing.
"Trump is really an incompetent idiot, Steve Bannon is really the shadow president running things" etc etc
Attempt to drive a wedge between Elon and Trump while also shit talking him. Same playbook
How many minutes before the Democratic faithful believe it?
I'll take 'Stories NBC invented out of nothing' for $1000, Alex.
Tomorrow's story involves bumper stickers in Maine.
'But many speculate that Polymarket is getting in trouble not because it did something terribly wrong—indeed, nobody was harmed or defrauded, bettors are all willing adults, who in some cases made out like bandits—but because it disrupts the old way of doing things and embarrasses those in power.'
Remember when the stodgy establishment was owned by Republicans?
No, Hank. None of *us* were alive from 1870-1910.
I have to admit it is a stretch nomination for her...someone here talked about having her lead the VA, whih seemed to be a perfect nomination...Now media and establishment vomiting all over Gabbard...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/senate-gop-must-stop-tulsi-gabbard-from-getting-keys-to-intelligence-castle/ar-AA1u22D6
If you thought about the worst possible choice for director of National Intelligence, former Democratic-turned-Republican Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard would be high up there. However, that's exactly who President-elect Donald Trump nominated to head the supervision of the United States's intelligence apparatus.
Republican senators, including Sens. Tom Cotton (R-AR), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), and Senate Majority Leader-elect Sen. John Thune (R-SD), now face a choice between putting the nation first or submission to Trump. After all, if Gabbard is approved, Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin will have an ideological sympathizer holding the keys to the U.S. intelligence community crown jewels. This is not an exaggeration.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/stunningly-unqualified-expert-urges-senate-to-reject-trump-s-spymaster-pick/ar-AA1u3dVx
Anti-Trump conservative and former Naval War College professor Tom Nichols urged the Senate to reject Donald Trump's pick of former Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence in a scathing article for The Atlantic.
Gabbard, who was a Democrat for years but constantly critical of her party and started supporting Trump more recently, has no qualification for the role, he warned — and has radical anti-American views that would completely undermine the intelligence community.
"Gabbard is stunningly unqualified for almost any Cabinet post ... but especially for ODNI," wrote Nichols. "She has no qualifications as an intelligence professional — literally none. (She is a reserve lieutenant colonel who previously served in the Hawaii Army National Guard, with assignments in medical, police, and civil-affairs-support positions. She has won some local elections and also represented Hawaii in Congress.) She has no significant experience directing or managing much of anything."
It doesn't matter who Trump nominates...the leftist media will lose its fucking mind.
I, for one, am really enjoying the meltdowns.
The Rubio pick sucks. The rest are meh to good.
Meltdowns = Yep. Priceless.
YT has so many lib meltdowns on X and Tik Tok. Hysterically funny.
I’m rather enjoying watching the Democrats and the media (I repeat myself) collectively lose their shit over Trump’s second term choices.
Gee, I wonder if that is the point.
I still disagree with this pick, he should nominate snowden
I doubt he would take the job.
Snowden would have to be pardoned (at a minimum) first.
Why? We just elected a convicted felon.
Multiple felonies!!!!!!!!!
https://nypost.com/2024/06/08/us-news/yale-law-professor-says-trump-isnt-a-convicted-felon-despite-guilty-verdict-heres-why/
Despite media reports, Rubenfeld insisted that it’s “not true” that Trump is already a “convicted felon,” arguing that one is “not a convicted felon because of a jury verdict.”
“You are not convicted until the judge enters that judgment of guilt. Now, in New York, it’s very likely that Judge Merchan will enter that judgment of guilt against Trump on the same day that he issues sentencing.
“This is not an exaggeration.”
Correct. It’s a straight up lie. Only question now is which leftist shill will repeat it here.
White Mike and then Lying Jeffy, but only because Jeffy doesn't wake up and waddle to the computer until noon.
The Establishment types still don't get it. Trump's Disruption Squad is not going to look like standard bureaucrats, or hold insider statist views.
Pizza Nips doesn't like Gabbard because she isn't a war-mongering piece of shit like him. I was the one who said she should get the VA, but I'm fine with her being head of the DNI, especially after she had that glowie travel flag put on her.
Pizza Nips
My favorite Japanese-Italian racial slur!
Trump learned from his first term to not put in establishment people waiting in line for their turn if he wants something done. this is like when he heard form teh generals but then wanted to hear from the actual troops on the ground this infuriated the generals who think they know it all from their comfy chairs in DC while men and women die in the field
The war machine in this country has a big sad.
FBI caught lying yet again about J6 pipe bomb suspect.
“In June 2023, the former Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Washington Field Office, Steve D’Antuono, who oversaw the pipe bomb investigation, said that the FBI received corrupted data from one of the cell carriers and that it most likely contained the identity of the pipe bomber. Given the significance of this information, my Subcommittee sent letters to the three major cell carriers, asking them to respond to Mr. D’Antuono’s claim of corrupted data,” he said.
“Every major cell carrier responded and confirmed that they did not provide the FBI corrupted data,” Loudermilk said.
https://justthenews.com/government/security/hldcell-companies-refute-fbi-testimony-j6-pipe-bomber-investigation-loudermilk
Arizona judge over 2020 electors case forced to step down after release of emails demanding people support Kamala, support PoC women, and calling critics Nazis.
https://arizonadailyindependent.com/2024/11/07/arizona-judge-in-2020-electors-case-demanded-judges-defend-kamala-harris/#google_vignette
Guess he wasn’t feeling chipper.
But he should.
Forget lethal injection, forget gas chamber, forget hanging. Woodchipper is safe, cheap and easy.
But it can be loud, so be considerate of your neighbors, and please finish all chipping by 8pm.
Kind of reminds me of Mr. Bonestripper in Nothing But Trouble.
"“I have been reflecting on Martin Niemoller’s brilliant post-WWII essay known as ‘First they came for…’ While the subject matter of his commentary was one of the most horrific periods in world history, its instruction applies equally to present day events,” said Cohen. “When we cannot or do not stand with others, the words of Martin Niemoller are no longer a historic reference to the atrocities of WWII, those words describe the present.”"
First they came for the communists and I said nothing. Then they came for the DEI advocates and I said "Are you sure you got all the commies?"
Niemoller's statement needs to put in the dustbin of history. It's nothing more than a thought stopping mechanism to try and nerf resistance to progressivism.
It’s really only useful for memes.
Same as that dumb Emma Lazarus poem.
“After reflection, I have come to realize that this was not proper use of this forum. I sincerely apologize to anyone put off or negatively impacted by my lapse of judgment.”
Judge suffers lapse of judgement. Is it a chronic condition?
You be the judge.
Collin Rugg
@CollinRugg
NEW: Reporter asks Rep. Thomas Massie about Trump's nomination of Matt Gaetz for Attorney General.
Reporter: Will he be confirmed by the Senate?
Massie: "Doesn't need to... we recess. He’s the Attorney General. Suck it up."
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1856817761919356935
Watching the media gag on all the crow they are being forced to eat makes each day more special than the next.
This is some real Larry Bird-tier shit talking. "I'm going to get the inbound at the top of the key, do a turnaround jumper, and you're not going to be able to do a damn thing to stop it."
"He even talks about the influx of illegal immigrants as something that's been pissing folks off in places like New York."
LOL
Fiona, Martha's Vineyard, pizza, 48 hours, etc.
They got blankets too liar.
Watch White Mike Dicksalad tell us all about how well they were treated there while ignoring that the illegal aliens were removed within those 48 hours.
Hopefully Abbott didn't send the smallpox blankets.
Based on reports of smallpox... it isn't the blankets to worry about.
'Polymarket not only called races pretty accurately, successfully crowdsourcing wisdom from those acting in their own self-interest, but also pretty early.'
Probably not a fair comparison, since Polymarket was motivated mostly by accuracy, and legacy media by ideological fantasies and partisan propaganda.
Made a lot or political “scientists “ look foolish.
Political scientists are like Christian Scientists. Or maybe dumber.
Dumber. I haven’t seen a Christian Scientist on TV or online saying Iowa was going to go for Kamala.
Slicing open a goat and reading the entrails has been shown to be just as accurate.
Christian Scientists are so dangerous they have to be Monitored.
If truth is stranger than fiction because fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities while the truth isn't; then, eventually, damned lies with statistics are guaranteed to veer off course into batshit insanity.
you can access Polymarket easily with a VPN is an open secret
Not even a secret. VPNs openly advertise that preventing geo-blocking is one of their main features. I mainly use one to hide torrenting from my ISP.
Jeffmikes entire narrative machine seems to be collapsing.
ABC leads scrambling to get at least one pro Trump voice on The View.
https://nypost.com/2024/11/13/media/abc-brass-scramble-to-bring-in-pro-trump-voices-to-the-view-and-other-shows-panic-mode/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=nypost
LA Times looking to get conservatives on editorial board.
https://deadline.com/2024/11/trump-la-times-editorial-board-1236173370/
Oh my can we get Keri lake on the view?
Lol. Would be epic.
My pick would be Kayleigh McEnany.
Stormy Daniels
I would love to see Navarro or Whoopi say something batshit crazy (the norm for them), and Kayleigh stops them to slam her binder on the table and fact-check them in real time.
Oh fuck, watching Whoopi go berserk over that would be comedy gold. In fact, the best comedy Whoopi has done in decades.
Kennedy or Kat.
Liz Wolfe
Just fire that gordita Ana Navarro and they'll already have improved the show.
But she's the one true act blue donating conservative on the show. Proves Nelson right.
It will be 400 to 1 still...wait they just look like 400 people.
Unless they find a woman like Scott Jennings, who gives master classes to CNN democrats, I don't see anyone going on that show.
'The company's spokesman said the raid on Coplan's house was "obvious political retribution by the outgoing administration against Polymarket for providing a market that correctly called the 2024 presidential election."'
And upsetting any last minute Democratic voting shenanigans?
Coplan is the subject of a joint criminal investigation by the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York
Is there no limit to Trump's weaponization of the DOJ!?
Still far sort of the current record.
This whole trump thing is getting to be more entertaining than I expected.
It’s going to be fun watching the swamp cockroaches run around after the rock they’ve been hiding under is moved.
right on par.
'Is this the sign of a Democratic fever breaking, and them finally getting comfortable admitting obvious truths, or will he be taught a lesson?'
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
'"I have a lot of questions," Sen. Mark Warner (D–Va.), the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, told reporters in response'
No, Sen. Warner. You'd better think up plenty of answers.
Jim Acosta of CNN claimed, on-air yesterday, that Trump is FALSELY claiming he won the popular vote.
CNN cannot go under fast enough.
He's going to get fired soon
Time-Warner might be the worst-run company not named Disney nor is primarily focused on making video games on the planet.
This is CNN
PoPuLaR vOtE means nothing.
Are we allowed to deny elections now?
WE? No.
THEM? Of course. No issues there.
Yes, because it’s (D)ifferent.
I was slow-rolling that declaration, but it's official at this point: Trump has a lead of over 3 million votes and there's only a few over 2 million votes left in California. Every remaining uncounted ballot could break for Kamala and Trump still wins the PV.
I am intrigued that the popular vote so far in California is only 58 to 38% in favor of Harris.
How many Democrats want to talk about proportional EC votes today?
I’m guessing none of them want to discuss proportional electoral college voting currently. With it, the margins for Trump look better, especially if implemented in California, Illinois, and New York.
See my comment below. Actually, Harris does better but Trump still wins.
I hope to see, on 1/7, suits involving the National Popular Vote Compact get filed. Given that the signees will, undoubtedly, violate their pledge and NOT give their votes to Trump, it is time to bury that thing.
I remember reading a few years ago that a number of states (all blue states) entered into the Popular Vote Compact, or something like that, where the states pledge to assign all of their electoral votes to the winner of the popular vote going forward. Shouldn't those states be giving those EC votes to Trump?
Am I remembering wrong? Or are those states violating their oaths? I know they did it to ensure the Dem gets more EC votes, thinking the Republican wouldn't be able to win the popular vote even when winning the EC vote.
The plan is written to be operative only after states with a majority of EV votes signs on so that the agreement would always control the winner.
Okay. Thanks for the reply. I didn't think those blue states would enter into something like that that could backfire on them. Still, I could see a scenario in the future where, after getting states with at least 270 EC votes to sign on, and then something happens where a Republican wins the popular vote and the Dem the regular EC vote, they reneg and say it was never legally binding to begin with.
I see zero chance that they would EVER do it. If they will not do so now, I see zero reason to believe they will in the future and it needs to be shot down.
California should be cut down the middle vertically.
The San Andreas fault is trying (really, like how Baja has been rifted from mainland Mexico). But you have to wait 5 million years.
My dream before I die is to see the San Andreas have a massive cave-in that swallows the California coast, and the remaining inland counties rename themselves Otisville.
Plans always get shot down to break it up into 3 or 6 states. Maybe someday it will succeed.
Re: illegals and cost of deporting them...
Don't fret on the deportation costs until we've tried
a) Not giving them free shit. There's no costs involved in NOT giving someone free shit (ok, well in govt functionality, there's probably costs involved in NOT handing out free shit).
b) Stronger enforcement of E-verify and employer-side compliance with all employment and employee-related tax laws (e.g, minimum wage enforcement, withholding enforcements...)
There are over 1M convicted illegal immigrants. 1.5M already have received final deportation orders.
It's a start.
That it has not been a start until now is borderline criminal.
How many of those convicted illegal immigrants are ones that the law does not permit them to be deported?
How many of those convicted illegal immigrants are ones that come from countries that will not accept their return?
If they have deportation orders, dipstick, then they can and should be deported. They’re obviously eligible.
They’re obviously eligible.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1226
Please read section c. There is a class of illegal immigrants which the government is NOT allowed to deport, because they have committed serious crimes.
Somehow, in your rush to be stupid, you missed the part about how they have deportation orders that are simply not being carried out by the current administration.
Damn, Jeffy, you’re thicker than a brick.
Furthermore, there are some countries, like Venezuela, which will not readmit most immigrants. So they can't physically be deported to their original nation. What do you suppose the government should do with them?
Tough shit. Then they can pick them up at the airport or dock for all I care. That’s their problem, not mine, and not ours.
Sounds like "not our problem"
We could always offer to stop refining Venezuela's oil. We are the only ones who can do so presently.
Venezuela can determine who enters their country? That’s an interesting concept, Lying Jeffy.
Ha! That's a good point.
So Venezuela can determine who gets in their borders, but we can’t, Jeffy? Why is that?
You've already declared in previous comments that if the U.S. immigration laws are unjust or unfair, it's fine for migrants to break the law and enter the country. So why are you talking about how we can't violate Venezuela's sovereignty by deporting Venezuelan illegals back to Venezuela? It seems you are "concern trolling" again about following the "law" when the law doesn't matter to you in your zeal for open borders in the U.S.
Yes, that is the “defeatist” part of Chemjeff selectively nuanced defeatist.
I coined that!
I'm trying to understand your argument. That these people are so valuable, like taking over apartment complexes, that Venezuela says you keep them as a gift?
Wait are you saying we should follow Venezuela laws but not have any here?
People like you are sicken. You preach because it doesn't impact you directly.
If they were seeking asylums they would have come in the right way.
These aren't. These have been issued deportation orders already.
'The word backlash is used so many times here'
I know some progressive backs that deserve a lashing, even more than those who have spent the past week in self-flagellation. But what are the odds that Democrats will get out the whips?
Meanwhile, in the Democratic Sanctuary State of Colorado (reporting by Colorado Newsline):
'In the wake of Republican Donald Trump’s reelection to the presidency, Colorado Gov. Jared Polis is helping to lead a new initiative that aims to protect state-level democratic institutions against federal overreach.
'Polis, a Democrat with two more years in his term, is co-chairing Governors Safeguarding Democracy, alongside Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, also a Democrat.
'“We founded GSD because we know that simple hope alone won’t save our democracy. We need to work together, especially at the state level, to protect and strengthen it,” Polis said during a call with reporters on Tuesday.'
and
'The two governors did not offer details on who else is part of the initiative, though they emphasized it’s nonpartisan and said they have engaged in outreach to Republican governors across the country.'
HAHAHAHAHA. Also
'GSD will be supported by Governors Action Alliance, a new nonpartisan organization, and funded by philanthropic donations. Neither Pritzker nor Polis disclosed donors.'
I suppose this new interest in states' rights and autonomy could be a good thing. Or the prelude to US Civil War 2.0.
"I suppose this new interest in states’ rights and autonomy could be a good thing."
A new interesting form of TDS/election-backlash are democrats doing what the republicans wanted in the first place. I have seen people on Reddit say they were going to report illegals out of spite because the latino vote leaned more Trump than last time.
And they are calling for auditable paper ballots with voter id
Maybe purple fingers?
Oh no the guy that put roe v wade back to the states, and said the states should form their on policy on the wu flu might not be in favor of states self rule?
But this time if Democrat-run states want to quit the Union, I say we just let them go...
But what about those of us within those states that want to stay? I wouldn’t have tossed out the eastern third of Tennessee the last time, and likewise with the parts of Illinois outside Cook County. I’ll fight to stay in the Union, Pritzker be damned.
Once we all slit from the union - we can have 50 separate civil wars.
Only 50? Even within most counties there are factions eager to fight.
I suspect if Pritzker announced that Illinois was seceding, the areas outside Cook County and Champaign would tell him, "Okay, good luck, but you're on your own."
This Illinoisian would.
I think they would say thanks. They have been trying to secede for years
Okay I'm confused. I thought Polis was the most libertarian governor in the entire known universe. I learned that right here at Reason.
I think Polis is still Governor McDreamy for the Reason editors, regardless of how authoritarian he gets.
Sure. If your understanding of libertarianism is smoking pot and talking about how much you hate right-Americans he's a top flight selection. I bet ENB wishes she lived next door.
Then she would be able to make him a sandwich whenever he's hungry.
"An excerpt: "MI assumes new immigrants generate ZERO additional corporate income tax revenues," writes the Cato Institute's David Bier. "I doubt MI's own tax policy experts agree. Employees are hired because they produce more corporate income. Ultimately, MI excludes over $700 billion in revenue from its analysis.""
I guess that constitutes "evidence" in some alternate reality.
Yes, we get it --- slave labor is way cheaper than actually paying people. The quality of the work also tends to be, you know, utter shit.
Government subsidizing employment makes employment cheaper screams CATO.
Oh yeah cato, well hiring Americans over illegals would increese the gdp by 11,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.96*
*Source same as them, I made it up
They missed an article,
Abolish non-profit status. It’s an arbitrary distinction based on tax filing
Also abolish ngos. They are groups the gov pays when it's too illegal for even the gov to do it
"MI assumes new immigrants generate ZERO additional corporate income tax revenues," writes the Cato Institute's David Bier. "I doubt MI's own tax policy experts agree. Employees are hired because they produce more corporate income. Ultimately, MI excludes over $700 billion in revenue from its analysis."
I guess most food trucks are not corporations.
Sadly, the Polymarkets case explains Matt Gaetz's nomination. Extremes only breed counter-extremes.
Yep. It’s now, deservedly, Hannibal at the Gaetz. Not a moment too soon.
Garland is about to get a taste of more than poetic justice; we can only hope. Like the dozens of corrupt and statist hacks who preceded him in his role, Garland fell victim- with a malevolent glee-to the ills of power.
Pick any of them. From Mitchell to Reno to Gonzales to Holder. All of them spit on the face of democracy the moment their egos got massaged by the hands of power.
Comes now Mr. Gaetz. He offers serious hope, if not radical changes, since he himself felt, saw and engaged the ugly wrath of the DOJ. He stared down Garland more than once and never took flight.
Now Gaetz gets to flip the script. He gets a chance to disinfect the DOJ. Its stench was never worse than under Garland.
I have to say I've been surprised by some of Trump's appointments but as the overall strategy comes into focus I'm loving it. He's going to finish what he tried to do in his first term. Drain the swamp. There will be successes and failures and weeping and screaming and blood on the pavement but it could be the libertarian moment we've all been waiting for.
I’m with ya. If Gaetz wreaks havoc, as he’s about to, I’m really thrilled with what Vivek and Elon will do.
Gut the place. Scorched earth. Vivek, especially, is coming with napalm and bulldozers. Sweet. Those bureaucrat losers are more ruinous than the plague.
Trump didn’t just save the republic; he’s about to restore it to its near-original design.
Di Martino's analysis can be summarily dismissed because he doesn't even get his data correct. FY23 outlays by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services was $2.14 TRILLION, not $1.4 as he deceptively portrays. He deliberately left out the "Payments to Healthcare Trust Funds," which was $480 billion that year, and the outlays for the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund at $614 billion, which are all part of the same medical welfare system.
Di Martino counts on people not actually knowing how to pull up and read basic government reports. Nothing he asserts needs to be taken seriously.
But what does Musk think?
I'm absolutely devastated that McConnells replacement is going to be his clone, that piece of shit, John Thune.
That pisses me off as well. The vote for majority leader should’ve been done after the new Congress was seated.
Can they do it again right away with the new congress? Because Thune has got to go. He's poison. They may as well have picked Merrick Garland.
Not too sure how it would work. I’d suspect you’d have to have some sort of challenge within the party.
They definitely voted for him.
Hilarious
Joe wrote in himself, he had to have.
Joe looks like he's having more fun than he has in decades. That's a man on a perpetual dopamine rush, knowing you successfully shivved the people who fucked you over.
It is pretty funny. Every post election picture I've seen of Joe he has a big grin on his face.
"Yee-haw, got 'em."
Seems like there was a story, I think it was told by Rick James, that was left with a cliffhanger about a puff of smoke coming from the back window of a limosine and a gloved hand pulling a Portuguese Water Dog back inside.
It seems like there’s an epilogue and final seen with the same hand and mysterious smoke opening a letter with the Presidential Seal on it that has the simple phrase, “Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to fuck things up.” penned inside.
Scenes from New York: Liberal darling Ezra Klein finally breaks the pundit omerta and admits what we all knew to be true: That cities governed by Democrats mostly suck, plagued by high cost of living and plenty of public disorder and inexcusable crime that
What day was this? Nov...13th. And the election was when?
So he cares but only because it is necessary to help Dems get elected. Nice.
It's interesting a handful of left wingers have finally realized reality counts and at least want to pretend they care. But most want a life protected within government and therefore still don't.
OMG. Left-leaning pundits don’t try to sabotage the left-leaning candidate right before an election. It’s horrible! Only left-wingers do this of course. Right-wingers never do this!
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2006/11/09/what_i_mean_by_i_feel_liberated/
This was right after Republicans lost control of the House in 2006 after they had controlled it since 1994.
So of course during the election, he dutifully carried water for Team Red. The moment they lost the election, however, Rush made his real feelings known.
Except, Jeffy, most of the legacy media never does that. They carry water during and even after the election as they’re consistently partisan.
Lying Jeffy pulling out a Rush Limbaugh reference? LMAO, the flailing continues!
All you have to do to be consistent is show us a comment from you noting your support for Rush. Do you have one?
Revealingly Jeffey responds to a Dem doing something stupid by trying to distract us and make the complaint a Rep. But isn't this the very thing Jeffsarc complains about all the time? I specifically remember "it's ok because they did it first" as a criticism. But here he is saying exactly that.
You know sometimes I think they don't apply consistent standards, but instead base them on whether the issue is a Dem or a Rep.
Bringing this up is particularly hilarious because the 2006 election was the watershed that began the current GOP populist movement.
Watching the Bush administration fruitlessly flail around in Iraq and then get its ass kicked in 2006 ended up being the justification the party's voters needed to start the process of pushing back against the party's neocon leaders. Subsequently, the housing meltdown and TARP debacle, Palin's 2008 barnburner convention speech and then being left out to dry by John McCain and Steve Schmidt, the Tea Party insurgency, Romney going harder against Ron Paul than he ever dared to do against Obama, and finally the GOPe pushing Jeb as the leading 2016 candidate is what ultimately got us Trump.
"have finally realized reality counts"
I think this is why a combination of the border shit worked, and specifically why the tranny add worked so well against Harris when people realize at least that part doesnt represent a massive overall number, but represents a very big cultural problem.
And the underlying theme has been people tired of being told to believe their lying eyes, that the political overton windown shift the leftist pushed for to tell us water is dry and up is down. "ACCCKSHUALLY the economy is better than ever (youre just too stupid to realize it), crime is down (FBI said so! Fact checked!!), and there is no biological difference between men and women and we should absolutely let men play in womens sports or in womens prisons"
You can only keep up these emperors clothes behaviors in extremely tyrannical settings where the consequence for speaking out is extreme, and despite them wanting to be there (look at the push for social media censorship post election), the people are thoroughly rejecting the mass delusions of the left
Right. The conflict people woke up to is reality of out of control inflation while Dems dick around pretending protecting trans is the civil rights framework of our time. Leftists do this intentionally (see Jeffey screaming about it on this thread) because their economic program is a fucking disaster and they must have something to distract the masses. It can work in the early stages, but eventually everyone recognizes the gameplan.
'The word backlash is used so many times here'
Abolish the Backlash
Eastern Europeans prefer the term boomerang. Blowback is also acceptable.
perfect place for we're suffering some blowback from the Wig Offensive but it's pretty obscure.
We need common sense backlash laws.
JD Vance is wrong about backlash control.
Liz gave pushback to the backlash.
It’s going to boomerang on her.
>> Now, Coplan is the subject of a joint criminal investigation by the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York as to whether he ran the site as an unlicensed commodities exchange.
lol communists gonna communist to the very end. long live Peanut and Fred. stay out of New York.
>>Liberal darling Ezra Klein finally breaks the pundit omerta
idk about "finally" the day before the T v. B debate Ezra was saying out loud "it wasn't so bad under T the last time..."
>>I wish there had been more Gaetzkeeping, truth be told. He's a bad pick:
there are zero bad picks when held up to Merrick Garland, period. also I enjoy Matt's prosecutorial style.
Or Mayorkas.
exactly. I’ll even accept the dog-murdering people’s-will-overthrowing sociopath Noem on the border over Alejandro
She’ll be willing to pull the trigger on any policy Trump wants.
The Bay Areas has been tough on incumbents this year:
"Calif. sheriff under fire after internal probe claims she had inappropriate relationship with top aide she hired for $246K job" [...]
"A California sheriff is under fire after a new report alleged she hired a top aide with whom she had an inappropriate intimate relationship with — to the tune of more than $246,000 per year.
San Mateo County Sheriff Christina Corpus is facing calls to resign after the damning report outlined other accusations of abuse of power and intimidation as head of the department, on top of her hiring of Victor Aenlle to serve as her chief of staff.
The release of the report also coincided with the arrest of a deputy who leads its Deputy Sheriff’s Association, with its union blasting the criminal charges as politically motivated by Corpus, according to reports..."
https://nypost.com/2024/11/13/us-news/san-mateo-county-sheriff-christina-corpus-faces-heat-over-damning-report-about-inappropriate-relationship/
"...But many speculate that Polymarket is getting in trouble not because it did something terribly wrong—indeed, nobody was harmed or defrauded, bettors are all willing adults, who in some cases made out like bandits—..."
Trump, something, something...
>>The think tanks are fighting
Think Tanks never made it as a video game.
>>The Trump-Musk relationship is fascinating
free association is beautiful yes.
David Bier's original analysis of the frequency and costs of illegal immigrant crime depended on data that ended in 2018. Whether ineptitude or bias is responsible, I leave to others.
short day, another Crowes show. go see the Black Crowes when they are in or near your town. change your life for the better.
Iron Maiden was not as loud and the production was not as impressive as I'd expected when I saw them the other night.
I wanted to catch Iron Maiden on this tour, as I'd never seen them live, but wasn't able to make it happen.
I did just go to my first GWAR concert last week. Pretty good experience. The show started with an extremely fat Trump fighting a Kamala with a UUUGE ass, and in the background was a song made from sampling Trump saying "they're eating the cats, eating the dogs, (they're eating the people)."
I didn’t know GWAR had a post Oderus incarnation. Hope they’re doing well, that’s a fun show.
The first time I saw them they cut off OJs head. I was hooked.
I'm jealous. I need a remedy, remedy, remedy, remedy, remedy, remedy, remedy for what's ailin' me too.
Saw them with ZZ Top when they were just getting big. I’m guessing they didn’t have much experience in big venues because they weren’t great. Saw them many years later and they killed it.
Just for you guys, I wasted almost an hour to re-calculate the EC vote, if all states awarded their votes proportionately (like many Democrats have ranted for). Note that I did not round each state votes to whole numbers. The results:
Trump, 271 votes (about 50.3% of EC votes)
Harris, 257 votes (about 47.7 % of EC votes)
So Trump still wins, but with a total similar to his national popular vote. And about 10 EC votes go missing (to third parties)--and maybe hurt Harris more.
know that while you diligently calculated and slaved away, I was actively searching for the bottom of the internet, and have delved through memes upon memes during your effort
"if all states awarded their votes proportionately (like many Democrats have ranted for)"
Virtually no Democrats advocate that states award votes proportionately. The big thing they have going is the
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact
Advocating proportional assignment of electors would have given Trump 22 and Harris only 33 of California's 55 electors.
Instead, they want California's 15M voters to swamp the votes of people in other states, too.
Some pundits liked to talk about proportional representation, but only when there's a chance Trump could win and PR "saves" the election for the Democrat.
P.S., there used to be a website that would recalculate presidential elections based on different rules, like #counties won...kind of like this static view of one proportional reconsideration...https://www.270towin.com/news/2021/02/04/update-2020-election-all-states-allocated-electoral-votes-like-maine-nebraska_1150.html
Nominate Brandon Herrera as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF)
https://discourse.nomineesforthepeople.com/t/brandon-herrera-for-atf-director/48436
Personally, I think Matt Larosiere would be the peerless choice but pretty much any gun tuber would be an excellent choice. Except maybe Lucas Botkin.
I vote Brandon because it would be the funniest.
Oops, wrong place.
I nominate Scott of Kentucky Ballistics.
https://www.youtube.com/@KentuckyBallistics
Definitely a more wholesome appeal.
What's Hickok 45 up to these days? He probably needs something to do
If he ran for office I'd register to vote.
Alex Jones’ Infowars is bought by The Onion after being shut down for peddling Sandy Hook conspiracy theories
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14082865/InfoWars-alex-jones-bought-Onion-sandy-hook.html
That is so... what's the word I'm looking for... appropriate.
Ahh yes. A 1.5B judgement against a person you hate without families proving how they were actually harmed (punitive per USSC is 10x harm) is appropriate in your view. Lol.
Forcing him to sell all his property. Trying to now make any future earnings taken by courts. All appropriate to good Ole sarc.
without families proving how they were actually harmed
This is the schadenfreudiest part of the whole thing. Of all the cases that should've invoked the "no standing/moot point 2-step", the case of potentially-libelously accusing victims of profiting off their victimhood should've been it.
Not surprising that someone who lies about people 24/7/365 is vehemently opposed to laws against libel, slander, defamation, abuse and the like. Or is it one of those things where it’s ok when your team does it and you tear your hair out when the evil they does it.
I just thought it was funny that a satirical website is buying a conspiracy website, being that there's some serious unintentional overlap between the two.
You’re really too stupid to know what’s going on here.
I literally explain supreme court standards in my post retard….
Now justify the amount using those standards.
Only appropriate to fascists.
"Democrats admitting big cities have big problems."
The democrats will demand billions of our tax dollars to solve their problems just like they've doing the past 60 years.