Review: Evil on Trial Seeks To Reach A Younger Audience
WWII correspondent William L. Shirer's The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich comes to life in this Netflix docuseries.

"I thought Churchill was the chief villain of the Second World War," podcaster Darryl Cooper declared to conservative commentator Tucker Carlson in September. In July, podcaster Candace Owens said reports of experiments conducted on Holocaust victims sound "like bizarre propaganda." The Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany published a 2020 survey showing a deficiency in Holocaust knowledge among younger Americans. A new approach to preserving the facts of the past is needed.
The Netflix docuseries Hitler and the Nazis: Evil on Trial is narrated by William L. Shirer, an American war correspondent and author of The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich—despite Shirer dying in 1993. Director Joe Berlinger used an AI recreation of Shirer's voice to recite passages from his books alongside audio from his actual radio broadcasts. Visually, the series interweaves gut-wrenching dramatizations with colorized 80-year-old footage.
Berlinger sought to reach a younger audience with the six-part series that examines the Nazis "from pre-WWII to the Holocaust to the Nuremberg trials." How do you do that? "Embrace the tools of cinema that they're used to," Berlinger says.
The picture revealed is frighteningly familiar: a strongman figure, dehumanization of entire ethnic groups, increased support for immigration restrictions. (Nazism was greatly influenced by the eugenicist arguments that buttressed the era's restrictionist American immigration laws.) The 58 percent of survey respondents who believe "something like the Holocaust could happen again" seem attuned to the dangerous echoes reverberating today.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Skip Netflix and consider watching a Russian produced, English language narrated series free on YouTube regarding the eastern struggle against the national socialists during the second world war called Soviet Storm starting wuth episodes 1-4 out of 18:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97iOxxH_64s
Many hours covering the Russian perspective of the Great Patriotic War. Was produced about a decade ago.
It's very much pro Russian, pro Soviet propaganda. It's not the most heinous example of it ever, but it's still extremely biased. There's better content out there.
Not that I'd necessarily recommend Shirer, either. His work is a bit out of date, based upon some outdated assumptions, and the historiography has moved onward a bit. He's often cited by Marxists who claim Hitler's Germany was funded and controlled by capitalists.
It was a good offering. For folks inculcated in the western narrative of WW2 in the European theater, it might cause some reservations. Folks needing a multi episode film on Molotov Ribbentrop won’t find that there either.
For World War II and history content on YouTube, I recommend a channel called TIKHistory. He’s British with a very much libertarian outlook. He’s put out some very lengthy videos where he explains that Hitler and the Nazis were absolutely socialist, so the Marxists fucking hate him.
He has some very good battle breakdowns, and a lot of good discussion of economics, especially as to the way economics impact the war. He’s started trying to talk about ideas like religion and philosophy, though I think he’s out of his depth there. He seems a bit too literal minded for some elements of that, which led him to conclude that there’s a secret cult of Gnosticism that millions of people are in without being aware of it because his definitions end up being too broad to be useful.
Oh, he also made a documentary series on the battle of Stalingrad that's like 40 hours long, so there's a frackton of details people who view the war through a more western lens are not going to be aware of.
Have seen some of his works. I thought what I saw was good.
"The picture revealed is frighteningly familiar: a strongman figure, dehumanization of entire ethnic groups, increased support for immigration restrictions. (Nazism was greatly influenced by the eugenicist arguments that buttressed the era's restrictionist American immigration laws.) The 58 percent of survey respondents who believe "something like the Holocaust could happen again" seem attuned to the dangerous echoes reverberating today."
To quote Bridget Phetasy:
"There will be a lot of ink spilled about why Americans elected Trump and Republicans in a red wave but I can sum it up.
“He’s not Hitler. I’m not racist. Fuck you.”
Yep. Fuck you, Bekah "IsRaeLi GenOCide in gAza!" Congdon.
Thanks Beckah. I listened to select recreations of Shirer's broadcasts, but in someone else's voice. Unlike today's American National Socialists, Shirer still had one functioning eye. His was the eye and voice of America's Democracy watching Europe's descent into Christian National Socialism, led by Herbert Hoover, Hamilton Fish Jr, Germany, Spain and Italy. With the AfD currently funding the Jesus Caucus in Alabama, we may yet witness a real-time reenactment. https://libertrans.blogspot.com/2024/08/behind-scenes-in-1929.html
The picture is frighteningly familiar.
A (potential) leader appointed, not elected.
Dividing the nation by race and religion among other attributes.
Centralizing power at the highest political level.
Control of the population through control of corporations.
Direct and indirect control of public communications.
Jailing political opponents.
Sounds like we barely avoided a national disaster.
Gleichschaltung
(From the neutral and impartial Wikipedia)
In their seminal work on National Socialist vernacular, Nazi-Deutsch/Nazi-German: An English Lexicon of the Language of the Third Reich, historians Robert Michael and Karin Doerr define Gleichschaltung as: "Consolidation. All of the German Volk's social, political, and cultural organizations to be controlled and run according to Nazi ideology and policy. All opposition to be eliminated." This accords with the general description provided by historian Jane Caplan, who characterized the term as "the coordination of German institutions into a cohesive, Nazified whole."
You couldn’t have a stamp collecting club in Germany without it being nazified. It’s interesting how much like a cultural revolution the entire process was.
But they were totally *not* really socialists. Nope.
dehumanization of entire ethnic groups
Yeah, because 55% of Jewish men voted for Adolph Hitler.
The totally natural and organic timing of this is totally natural and organic!
I was going to say something about Godwin's Law, then I remembered that Godwin himself is OK with Trump/Hitler comparisons.
https://www.commondreams.org/news/godwins-law-trump