Most People Support School Choice. Why Won't They Vote For It?
School choice advocates work hard, but public school interest groups work harder.

On Tuesday, voters in Nebraska, Kentucky, and Colorado rejected school choice at the ballot box, voting against two pro-school choice state Constitutional Amendments and moving to repeal a school choice law. The defeat of all three measures signals a turning tide for school choice policies. After several years of major legislative and electoral successes—and a night where Republican politicians, who are more likely to support these measures, overperformed—voters themselves seemed resistant to approving individual pro-school choice ballot measures. However, this outcome isn't exactly surprising.
"School choice has never—at least not that I can think of—been approved in a popular vote," says Neal McCluskey, the director of The Cato Institute's Center for Educational Freedom. "We see polling that typically shows people support school choice if you just sort of present them with, 'hey, we could give you money and then you could use it to go seek the education of your choice.'" But, McCluskey adds, highly motivated public education employees manage to dominate the conversation when it comes to ballot measures.
"Referenda for school choice are always at a disadvantage because you're trying to take on entrenched, easily organized interests who defend the status quo and they can put a lot of money into defending the status quo and a lot of boots on the ground," says McCluskey.
In Nebraska, voters moved to repeal a school choice bill signed into law earlier this year. The law, Legislative Bill 1402, created scholarships allowing certain families—including low-income families, military families, those with special-needs children, or children facing other challenges like bullying—to allow eligible families to pay for private school with private money.
In Kentucky, voters also rejected Amendment 2, a measure that would have enabled the state legislature to fund school choice programs like charter schools, tax-credit vouchers, education savings accounts, or other backpack funding programs that would give parents the ability to use some of the money that would have funded their child's public school education to help fund private or homeschooling.
In Colorado, voters also rejected a school choice Amendment, though Colorado voters came the closest to passing the measure—the tally hovered around 52 percent voting "no" and 48 percent voting "yes" when the race was called by The New York Times on Thursday. The ballot measure, Amendment 80, aimed to enshrine a right to school choice into the state's constitution. The text of the measure states that "All children have the right to equal opportunity to access a quality education; that parents have the right to direct the education of their children; and that school choice includes neighborhood, charter, private, and home schools, open enrollment options, and future innovations in education."
Despite polling indicating generally broad support for school choice, it's hard for pro-school choice groups to combat intense campaigns from anti-choice advocates, who frequently frame the measures as destroying or defunding local schools.
"A lot of parents would probably like to have school choice, but they have regular jobs. They're not sure, even if school choice passes that they're going to get it. They're not sure how to use it. But the status quo or the establishment knows that they could lose money and they don't like that," says McCluskey. "You have a highly motivated, relatively easily organized group of people who will defend the status quo, and it's very hard to balance that out on the pro-school choice side, in large part because parents can't go out every weekend and campaign for it."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
End all tax money going to public education.
Sounds like school choice took it in the rear end on election night. Too bad there wasn't a more serious candidate to stimulate voters and provide more stiff competition.
^BINGO. Exactly why voters don't vote for it.
Sure; They want to keep their kids out of Commie-Indoctrination camps.
They just don't want to pay for it.
Most people don't perceive a need for school choice for their own children.
So they aren't motivated to vote for it.
Meanwhile, they might know several teachers who oppose it.
So, it's a lot easier to support school choice in the abstract, when your friends haven't been giving you an earful about how horrible it is.
Much easier to motivate people to "fix" things by replacing the school board or somesuch.
Yeah, all those overpaid teachers riding around in their S-Class Mercedes, bitching about their 4 hour work day. I kid of course.
I lot of places teachers don't make enough to get out of the poverty level and have to deal with the shifting tide of government who one year want Math 2.0 curriculum, the next they want the Bible added to EVERY class.
Meanwhile every parent cannot understand that their little snowflake is average and doesn't have a development disorder and should be give 'accommodations' for test and homework and the latest craze that hit my wife's school - hydration. The kids NEED a water bottle on their desk so they can stay hydrated because some study said so and the fact that all the kids are now lining up to go to the bathroom every 15 minutes is just a coincidence.
Hint: Its not the teachers...
I only know about the one in Colorado - but the reason it went down is because it was written almost exclusively to earmark property taxes for parental disbursement. That's really what 'school choice' is about now - forcing the state to extract taxes in order to give it to a small subset of individuals for their determination of what that important thing (something that was deemed important enough for the state to extract taxes in the first place) should be spent on.
It's a scam. Just because management by school districts and power of unions is also a scam does not mean the 'school choice' has become anything but a scam building on a scam masquerading as 'reform'.
You do kinda have to play culture wars to win these fights. “You get to send your kids to schools where boys can’t go to girls bathrooms” ads might have helped.
You mean fake scare tactics. Oh Boy!
First, lets be honest. School choice is mostly for people that believe there is not enough religion in public school.
And there is your answer.
So your asking people that are happy enough with public schools to pull funding from public schools and give them to private schools.
So the upper middle class get a slight break in private school costs. Those who cannot afford private schools (even with a $boost) would be voting to defund their public schools so some people richer than them can send their kid to private school.
We need more religious schools so we can learn history, science, math and morality from the Bible.... NOT!
You know, some poor people want to send their kids to private school, too.
"School choice advocates work hard, but public-school interest groups work harder."
Plus, the teachers' unions have more money for their propaganda campaigns.
Paid for by their opposition no less.
If you talk to a lot of people who have kids who go to public school, they may think public school is bad 'in that other state' or 'in that other neighborhood' but they like their local public school and teachers. They talk to those teachers at parent-teacher conferences. That connection has a lot of influence.
It certainly sells more bond issuance at the local level.
If it was a plan to Co-op it people would probably support it.
Getting the Gov-Gun theft out of the equation will be the hardest part.
Turns out people like to STEAL from their neighbors and get away with it.
It has literally become the biggest institution of politics.
Then you have the School Board members who are bought and paid for by the Teacher's Unions. When you have a Board member tell you to "sit down and shut up", because you don't have a child in school so your statement is wrong. Then when you are told to leave because you tell that Board member that when they stop taking $3,000 a year in property taxes and $1,100 in wage taxes from me, then I'll sit down and shut up.
I voted for school choice in my state, but the amendment lost.
School vouchers financed by collected tax monies are not getting the brightly-lit spotlight shined where it matters: passing those state-required tests that equalize the means of education.
At least, that was my assessment when I read the proposed amendment and almost did not vote for it, because it was a case of tax money going to private schools, as if private schools means some horror movie school straight out of 'The Collector' franchise ( ::shudder:: ), where the investment is never seen again!
First, I am a product of school choice and went a Catholic elementary school. But my parents made that choice with no help from the government. My reservation about school choice starts with the fact that in the end school choice will always likely be a limited percentage of the school children who have to be educated. There are places where there will not be choice schools because of economic reasons. There will be parents too busy to want to go through the process of selecting and applying for a private school. I was very happy with the public schools my children attended. Parents like me will likely continue with public schools. I am happy there is choice but have no foolish illusions that it will replace public schools. It will always be a niche market.
I'm a bit confused by your comment. You seem to be saying that because good private schools may not be available for all poor parents, you don't want _any_ poor parents to be able to get their children out of failing public schools.
Not what I am saying at all. What I am saying is that choice schools are and likely always will be a niche market. Therefore, the public will need to continue to fund public schools. Data also show that school choice is more of a benefit to middle class than the poor. While marketed as a help for poor children more middleclass children get the benefit.