Democratic Hubris Blows Up in Michigan
Democrats assumed they could campaign as neoconservatives while keeping Middle Eastern votes. They were wrong.

Perhaps Vice President Kamala Harris thought she could take Michigan's Middle Eastern communities for granted. In a state with a huge Iraqi-American community, Harris touted the endorsement of former Vice President Dick Cheney—who helped destroy Iraq—and campaigned alongside his equally neoconservative daughter, former Republican congresswoman Liz Cheney. And in a state with a huge Lebanese- and Palestinian-American community, one of the Harris campaign's closing messages was a pro-Israel rant delivered by former President Bill Clinton.
The Uncommitted movement, which represented around 100,000 dissatisfied Democrats in Michigan, warned that Harris would have to give at least a symbolic concession to Palestinian rights in order for those voters to come home. Democratic leadership brushed off the risks, arguing that the wars in the Middle East wouldn't be a salient issue. After all, former President Donald Trump "wants to put a ban on Arabs coming into the country," President Joe Biden said. "We'll make sure we understand who cares about the Arab population." What would Arab Americans do? Vote for Trump?
The answer, it turns out, was yes. Trump won around 42 percent of the vote in Dearborn, a heavily Arab suburb of Detroit, compared to 36 percent for Harris, and the rest for third-party candidates, according to the latest results. It was a shocking result in a community that had gone 74 percent for Biden in 2020. But it wasn't a surprising one. Muslim and Arab-American figures had been warning for months that foreign policy was a make-or-break issue in parts of Michigan. And Trump made a real effort to win over those votes, including reaching out to Abdullah Hammoud, the Democratic mayor of Dearborn.
Hammoud refused to endorse either candidate. He said he wouldn't be "fooled" by Trump, who supported Israel against Palestinians and supported the Saudi-led war in Yemen. (It's worth mentioning that Michigan also has a large Yemeni-American community.) Hammoud also denounced the Biden administration's massive support for Israeli military campaigns and the Harris campaign's decision to send Cheney and Clinton to Michigan as surrogates.
Clinton's speech on November 1 appeared to be particularly insulting to the Arab and Muslim communities. He started off by saying that he understands "why young Palestinian- and Arab-Americans in Michigan think too many people have died" in Israel's wars. "The people who criticize it are essentially saying, yeah but look how many people you've killed in retaliation, so how many is enough for you to kill to punish them for the terrible things they did?" he said.
But Clinton quickly took a different turn: "That all sounds nice until you realize, what would you do if it was your family and you hadn't done anything but support a homeland for the Palestinians and one day they come for you?" Then, unprompted, Clinton began to talk about how Israelis "were there first" in "Judea and Samaria," an Israeli nationalist term for the West Bank, and how a Palestinian leader had told him that Arabs "only care about [Palestinians] when they need to blame America and Israel for their people being upset."
Trump, instead of being condescending to Middle Eastern voters, spoke to them as if he wanted their votes. "They could turn the election one way or the other," Trump said at an October 26 rally alongside Muslim clergy in Michigan. "The Muslim and Arab voters in Michigan and across the country want a stop to the endless wars and a return to peace in the Middle East. That's all they want," Trump added. He also attacked Harris for campaigning alongside Cheney, the "Muslim-hating warmonger."
Harris tried to do damage control at a November 4 rally alongside Arab-American leaders in Michigan, promising to "do everything in my power to end the war in Gaza, to bring home the hostages, end the suffering in Gaza, ensure Israel is secure and ensure the Palestinian people can realize their right to dignity, freedom, security and self-determination."
Michigan has around 211,405 Arab-American residents, and around 241,828 Muslim residents. Each community on its own makes up just above 2 percent of the state's population. (They overlap, but not entirely. Many Muslims in Michigan are not Arab, many Arabs are Christian, and many of the Chaldean-Assyrian Iraqis in Michigan consider themselves neither Arab nor Muslim.) As it stands, Trump leads in Michigan by a little over 93,000 votes.
Whether Trump actually follows through on his promises—or uses ending endless wars as an excuse for even more military escalation—remains to be seen. After all, his first administration was filled with Iran-obsessed war hawks, and many of the same names are on his cabinet shortlist.
But the fact that he made those promises to begin with shows how the foreign policy dynamics of presidential elections have changed. Democrats had assumed that it was a matter of out-hawking the competition. Now, dovish swing voters have made clear that there is a political cost to war. Both parties ignore it at their peril.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Kamala blue that one.
And that ain't all she blew.
She failed to provide enough lip service to the upper and lower penisulas.
She's known to put her head down and get to work.
It is difficult for the Democrats to square the circle of not pissing off Jewish voters by tacitly supporting Hamas's war crimes of 10/07/23 or offending the Arab voters by not supporting those war crimes by the Gazan governing organization. There was no good route through that minefield.
^
Actually, openly taking EITHER side would have been better than trying to take both.
There at the end - We are just gonna rewrite history and pretend Trump 45 was a warmonger?
GFY Petti, go back to wherever you came from, you are terrible and make this rag worse
His TDS slipped out. He could not help himself. It was a decent article up to that point.
The Reason splurge out has been glorious.
Better meltdown. MSDNC or Reason?
Watched a few minutes of The View. The Sunny lady really doesn’t like white women.
If Harris had the guts to pick Shapiro as her running mate and stood up to the fringe left she would have won not only PA but probably enough swing states to put her over the top. Instead she did what the Dems started a number of years ago, caving to the radical crazies in their party and not take a position on anything. Turns out people want a President who has a platform of something other than "Joy".
Too bad, So sad.
Nope. She’s retarded regardless of who she picked. You can’t fix that.
Imagine how badly she would have fucked up foreign relations.
I liked Shapiro, but Harris was in a hopeless bind. For every vote she could pick up on the Constitutionalist right and center, she was likely to lose more than the break-even number of two to left-wing parties, who were polling significant support. As it was, the Left-leaning Walz helped her wrap up the Left (except for Hamas-supporting subscribers to the "Dearborn Independent").
Honestly, why would Shapiro want to get involved in the first place?
Dick Cheney—who helped destroy Iraq
I'm no fan of anyone named Cheney, but give me a fucking break, Petti.
For Arab Americans, the election was just about bad choices in the short term.
In the longer term, both Israel and the US (to the degree it's possible for the superpower to be a pariah) are now pariah states in that region.
That's going to have far more relevance going forward than any pretense that domestic electoral politics can effectively drive US foreign policy
I know you're still grieving over Nasrallah, Sinwar, et al.
"The Muslim and Arab voters in Michigan and across the country want a stop to the endless wars and a return to peace in the Middle East. That's all they want," Trump added. He also attacked Harris for campaigning alongside Cheney, the "Muslim-hating warmonger."
Maybe campaigning with neocons wasn't the best idea if you want the Muslim and Arab votes.
The dems thought having the Cheneys on board would help win them traditional republicans, not knowing that they already had their vote since the first Trump term, and assuming that brown people would automatically vote for them. Im glad to see they got their asses handed to them.
I repeat – domestic electoral politics isn’t effective in driving US foreign policy. At some point, that realization will become obvious. Clearly not yet
Loser.
You're aware that NOBODY there like the "Palestinians", right?
Don't want anything to do with them.
Most don't much like Iran either.
Don't think pissing either of em, or both, will really be a problem for the US.
I don't think "pariah state" means what you think it means.
So the Muslim vote is more anti-war than the liberaltarians at Reason.
What are you talking about? Trump is going to start WW IV, whereas Reason endorsed peacenik Nikki Haley.
Trump already started WWIV (Solemani), we are at least up to 5 or 6 now.
much, much more.
"After all, former President Donald Trump "wants to put a ban on Arabs coming into the country," President Joe Biden said."
Interesting to quote Biden on what Trump said/wants. What did Trump actually say?
I'd buy this theory a lot more if there was anything special about the election results in Michigan compared to, say, Wisconsin or Pennsylvania.
I don't know why the author called Clinton's speech a "rant". It was very soft-spoken and truthful, especially regarding how Arafat rejected the two state solution Clinton had helped negotiate. It just wasn't something smart to talk about in a heavily Muslim state like Michigan, at a Harris-Walz podium, just before the election!
the Religion of Peace comes through with the peace. fucking beautiful.
Democrats see Arab and Muslim Americans generally as those who just need to be brought up to understand the proper values, and who just need to be told what to do in the meantime.
You can apply that "logic" to Blacks and Hispanics as well. It's the new plantation, and Dems have quite a history with those.
The Iraqi's in Michigan are Chaldean Christians and don't consider themselves to be arabs as such. They also don't care much about (or for, frankly) Jews, Israel, and Palestinians are just as much part of the 'oppressor class' to them as the Iraqi muslims they've fled.
Bush/Obama/Trump/Biden didn't blow up Afghanistan, the Taliban did that. They also didn't start the war going on in Palestine, Hamas did that. If Arabs in Michigan think that supporting terrorism is necessary to get their votes, I hope they have many more bad choices to come.
I find it interesting that according to exit polls at least, American Jews voted for Trump in lower numbers than in any of his previous campaigns - 24% in 2016, 30% in 2020, 21% in 2024.
Of course, the moron commentariat here won't remotely understand any of this.
Democrats just don't get it.
Both Muslims and Jews want peace in the Middle East.
Why is this so hard to understand?
Because the donor class and deep state (and possibly Christian Zionists) does NOT want peace in the Middle East. They want arms sales, pols who are owned, a permanent presence of American empire, support for the most extreme settler/greater Israel types, an electorate that can be manipulated, the second coming of Jeebus, war with Iran (or war against Islam).
Much of the commentariat here seems to want all that too. To his credit, Trump talks the right game about wanting peace - but his instincts are also quite poor. Prob better than those among the D establishment (like Biden/Clintons) or R establishment (or Reason establishment) who follow the money and believe they are also following the right path while manufacturing consent. But I guess we'll find out.
So strange immigrants don't want to be murdered here anymore than they wanted to die in their home countries. Harris flat out blew it.
As a Michigander, nothing could please me more than to see how badly Trump beat up Harris in this state.
The three witches in Lansing, Whitmer, Bensen and Nessel must be getting quite nervous, now that their Washington, D.C. protectors will soon vanish like one of their spells.
Between the cheating and fraud in Wayne County (includes Detroit) and what happened up here in Antrim County, Trump's victory is payback. Harris, a low functioning moron, and Walz, a compulsive liar and fraud as well as both are confirmed communists have now to face their defeats like the arse kicking they so well deserved.
Trump, however doesn't deserve all the credit. The Democrats continued to literally f*** thing up wherever they put their squalid, grubby little hands, from the economy and crime to the massive uncontrolled immigration and lastly the wars in Ukraine and the middle east.
The dems have things so badly f***** up, we may not be able to recover and Ukraine is going to end up having to cede some of their territory to Russia, while Zelensky and his wife may very well face their own Ceausescu moment, that is unless they manage to escape to one of their villas on the Med or in Miami.
I mean it’s hilarious, fitting and everything they deserved but… should we be worried that a group of people with a modern history of trouble with fitting in and demands for conformity to their archaic rules/dogmas, literally all over the world.. seem to be dead set on importing their conflicts here, over all other interests? Backing terrorist and murderers no less.
To say nothing of their insistence that we rearrange our national priorities and friendships to appease them.