CNN Panelist Claims That Donald Trump Caused Charlottesville Attack
The punch line: It was a panel on the dangers of misinformation.

National security officials, Democratic politicians, and media figures frequently list the dreaded scourge of misinformation as one of their top concerns. Mainstream news organizations incessantly warn their readers and viewers that right-wing provocateurs, Republican politicians, and foreign agents are flooding social media with falsehoods. Tech regulators all over the world—from Brazil to the European Union—are using the threat of misinformation as a pretext for censorship. In the U.S., the First Amendment makes it much more difficult for would-be censors to directly criminalize misinformation, though that won't stop politicians from trying; Democratic Vice Presidential candidate Tim Walz has already suggested—incorrectly—that misinformation and hate speech are not protected speech.
This claim is itself an example of misinformation, in that it is a false statement; the Supreme Court has steadfastly maintained that hate speech, for example, is protected by the First Amendment. Yet when mainstream Democrats express clearly incorrect statements, they seldom attract the misinformation label. This speaks to the one-sidedness of the concept—a one-sidedness that was perfectly illustrated during a CNN panel on Sunday.
The topic of the panel, ironically, was misinformation. CNN's Wolf Blitzer was interviewing former Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson about how malicious lies being spread by right-wing actors are eroding trust in U.S. democracy. Blitzer invited several panelists to respond. Maria Cardona, a Democratic strategist, chimed in with a comment about former President Donald Trump.
"Let's remember Charlottesville," she said. "Let's remember January 6th. All of those events ended in tragedy and all of those events were spurred on and inspired by the words that came out of the former president's mouth."
CNN contributor Scott Jennings, a Republican, then interrupted Cardona to dispute that Trump's rhetoric caused the 2017 rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, where one person was killed and a dozen others injured by a white nationalist. Cardona doubled down, asserting that Trump "went out there and said both sides are good people."
"I do think he caused Charlottesville," she said. "Those people that were marching were marching in support of one person. They were marching in support of Donald Trump."
While discussing misinformation, Maria Cardona says Donald Trump inspired Charlottesville by saying the oft-used & debunked "good people on both sides" line, which happened after Charlottesville, anyway.
She then claims Democrat leaders didn't support anti-Israel rallies. pic.twitter.com/KytdgVu4uD
— Jason Rantz on KTTH Radio (@jasonrantz) November 4, 2024
These claims are flagrantly wrong.
Most obviously: Trump's rhetoric did not cause a group of white nationalists to organize a rally in Charlottesville. The controversy over Trump's remarks has to do with things that he said in response to the rally.
And there too, critics of Trump overreached. As the fact-checking website Snopes has concluded, Trump never said the neo-Nazis were very fine people—he said neo-Nazis and white nationalists "should be condemned totally." His "fine people on both sides" comment referred to the debate over whether it was a good idea to remove statues of problematic historical figures. And indeed, reasonable people can disagree about the wisdom of taking down statutes, and about which historical figures deserve new scrutiny.
It's perfectly fine to disagree with Trump's handling of the episode, or to think his condemnations did not go far enough. But no serious person has suggested that remarks by Trump are what spurred on the racism and violence in Charlottesville in 2017. The rally was organized by explicit white nationalists Jason Kessler and Richard Spencer for the purpose of protesting the removal of Confederate General Robert E. Lee's statue. Their efforts were not inspired by, or in defense of, Donald Trump.
At no point did Blitzer jump in to accuse Cardona of spreading misinformation. The job of correcting her was left to co-panelist Jennings. Remember: This was a panel ostensibly highlighting the toxic spread of misinformation.
This is the sort of flagrantly false assertion that the host would, in any other circumstance, interrupt and correct—especially, if, say, the speaker was a Republican. (Though conservative panelist @ScottJenningsKY did an admirable job of setting the record straight.)
— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) November 3, 2024
People spreading bad information, either accidentally or deliberately, is not new. It was happening on television, on the radio, in newspapers, in books, and in everyday conversation long before social media existed. Commentators who fixate on platforms they distrust or partisan actors they dislike frequently treat misinformation like an actual pathogenic disease, all while ignoring falsehoods that arise on their own side or treating those as mere differences of opinion.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Pure TDS.
This isn't even "the skirt was too short, she was asking for it"
It's "hey, she was probably going to have worn a short skirt the next week, so she was probably asking for it"
But hey, its always by and means necessary with these people. Whatever serves the narrative.
That slut!
An article criticizing criticism of Trump? No way. Doesn't exit. Contradicts the narrative. Nothing to see here. Move along.
Ideas™ !
But Jen Psaki says this is true. Did facts change sarc? Yes. You've made this same claim being criticized lol.
Psarc has never heard of the exception that proves the rule.
It must be a day ending in Y. Sarc is trying to turn a subject damning to the left into criticism of the right.
Sad.
"Let's remember Charlottesville," she said. "Let's remember January 6th. All of those events ended in tragedy and all of those events were spurred on and inspired by the words that came out of the former president's mouth."
It's getting harder and harder to see leftists as rational, sentient beings. Either they know they're lying and are evil enough to do so and cause discord, or they're NPCs who no matter how much time passes, cannot accept any new information or perspective.
Obama said it at an event on the weekend too. This is obviously a new party narrative, which is weird because it can't even be misconstrued as true. Even in the Soviet Union or the Nazi Regime they'd base their gaslighting on something real. The Democrats have gone beyond that.
By their same logic, Patrice Cullors, Nikole Hannah-Jones, and Charles M. Blow caused riots in Minneapolis, Portland, Kenosha, and at the white House by spreading the #handUpDontShoot narrative.
Should they be prosecuted for causing riots?
Or was it different because those riots were in the name of Racial Justice®™?
Absolutely (D)ifferent.
Even though Trump did not call for these action the left will tell you his just being elected alone gave approval of these actions and that is why anyone who votes for him is by extension a racist nazi etc etc......
Not bad information. Bad reasoning. Robby doesn't get it. They are making an argument that Trump sets the mood and invites this chaos, whether it is the "fine people" rhetoric or his whole schtick. But it is up for debate.
Reasonable people understand that we need to look for causes and trends and so on and this means positing theories and claims by which to argue. This is very different than misifnformation like "they are eating pets" or "illegal people are voting". That kind of misinformation is bad because it is making up reality completely. It's not even a theory or an interpretation, just false facts.
Robby gets it wrong again.
Or what about the "Hands Up Don't Shoot" misinformation?
Did that cause the riots in Portland, Minneapolis, Kenosha, and at the White House?
Heraclitus.
Is.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
FOAD, asshole.
Feel free to explain why CA outlaws ID for voting.
Feel free to explain the DoJ attempting to prevent the removal of proven illegal aliens from voting rolls.
LOL. Good one. Democrat lies are simply explanations of reality. Republican lies are lies.
So, fake but accurate?
Revs razor
When it comes to Marxists (and their subsets) never ascribe to ignorance war can be ascribed to malice
Tribalism - always blame malice when talking about the other tribe.
This guy has absolutely zero self-awareness.
It’s really sad.
“Let’s remember Charlottesville,” she said. “Let’s remember January 6th. All of those events ended in tragedy and all of those events were spurred on and inspired by the words that came out of the former president’s mouth.”
By that same logic, the riots in Portland, Minneapolis, Kenosha, and the White House were inspired by the words of Patrice Cullors, Nikole Hannah-Jones, and Charles M. Blow.
Should they be prosecuted for causing riots?
Or is it okay because those were not riuots, but resisatance against White Supremacy®™?
Look, what don't you understand? OrangeManBad! This justifies any lies told to keep him out of office and to ruin him.
Do we once again have to review Wolf Blitzer's triumphant appearance on Jeopardy?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVC28oemocA
The man has the IQ of a warm room.
Never saw this; thanks for the laughs.
In F or C?
WOW! They are getting desperate. Anything they can come up with is fair game for the next 36 hours.
Props to Robby for turning on "fellow journalists" ("fellow 'journalists'"?) and calling them out. "Courage" like that has been rare the last ~10-12 yrs.
Wolf Blitzer
A - Is a cunt.
B - Has a cunt.
C - Has never seen a cunt.
D - Is an outstanding journalist proving the importance of the 4th Estate for the health of democracy.
Choose all that are correct.
"This claim is itself an example of misinformation" ... Indeed.
Enter: Leftard Self-Projection tactics 101.
The controversy over Trump's remarks has to do with things that he said in response to the rally.
No. The controversy was over what leftists CLAIMED he said. Snopes was not needed, it was obvious on the universally available whole video.
That the left and their media ignored. Like Reason.
Like Robby right here.
There is no legitimate question here.
Beyond everything else, the leaders of the Charlottesville mess were Biden voters--or has everyone forgotten who Richard Spencer endorsed in 2020?
Trump may lie and over exaggerate, but no where near as badly as the corporate media or the Harris campaign does.
Bear in mind that "hate speech" is only protected free speech as long as the Supreme Court says it is.
With progressives like Harris/Walz naming Supreme Court judges it probably won't last long.
And similarly, "disinformation" will be literally whatever Democrats say it is. Republicans might push back, but as observed, the media won't. But once there are government agencies run by Democrats, then we won't even have that.
it never ceases to amaze me how Republican rhetoric always is blamed for unrelated violence, but Democrat violence is completely unrelated to Democrat rhetoric that that Republicans are a bunch of Nazis who pose an existential threat to their very existence.
You have to be pretty fucking stupid to believe this bullshit.
CNN is the network whose viewers still largely believed in December of 2020 that the hospitalization rate for Covid19 was 50% or higher and that something like 1 in 20 people infected were going to die rather than recover.
CNN is the network which aired the context needed to debunk the "fine people hoax" live and in real time, and reported the full transcript on their website but whose anchors continued to perpetuate the hoax for nearly 2 years. Even when the Washington Post ran a story about a number of hoaxes and "misinformation" stories that a lot of people had been convinced to believe, CNN's air staff continued to promote the one of those which was ultimately cited as the reason why Joe Biden "had to get into the race" in 2020.
CNN is the network whose viewers probably still believe that surgical masks are effective at stopping the spread of Covid, and that grade school children should be on at least their 7th Covid booster by now (7 might be an exaggeration, but since the data indicates that almost nobody under 30 ever really needed the Covid shots, it's not hard to make the case for 1 booster being excessive for most children).
CNN viewers think that trump literally told people to "inject bleach", and that Joe Rogan claimed that "horse paste" alone cured his Covid (in reality, Rogan talked about being prescribed maybe 5 different treatments including monoclonal antibodies, Covid-specific antivirals, steroids which had been showing some positive results with the virus, and generic human-dosed Ivermectin which led to his symptoms clearing up in 4 days; when I had Covid the first time in June 2020, my fever cleared up after 4 days with absolutely no treatment other than rest and large amounts of vitamin C (the cough lasted a few days longer, and I continued to test positive for the virus for 2 weeks without any symptoms).
These are the people who believe that the "Russiagate" hoax was completely justified at the time "because Jan 6th", but are incapable of entertaining the thought necessary to wonder whether the "stop the steal" rhetoric could have got nearly as much traction if the Dems in Congress hadn't focused primarily on attempting to undo and undermine confidence in the 2016 election for 4 years including an impeachment related to trump having done things that Biden had freely and openly claimed to have done as VP in 2014 and for "obstructing" the investigation into something that trump (and the people who fabricated the Steele Dossier for the HRC campaign) was in a position to know was a hoax.
If CNN wanted an example of misinformation, they might have simply selected almost any hour from the last 6-7 years of their cable feed during which their "news" staff was on air and talking about virtually any topic.
Keep saying it. You really can't hate the media enough.