Saudi Arabia's 'The Line' Violates Human Rights and Common Sense
Inhumane labor practices, worker deaths, and the forced eviction and repression of local residents have characterized the kingdom's efforts to build a miles-long linear skyscraper in the desert.

It turns out that Saudi Arabia's The Line project is a massive violation of good urban design principles and human rights.
A growing chorus of workers, whistleblowers, and human rights organizations say that the ongoing construction of The Line—which is supposed to be a 100-mile-long skyscraper upon completion—has been marred by inhumane labor practices, worker deaths, and the forced eviction of thousands of nearby villagers.
Most recently, The Line workers told an ITV documentary crew that they've been forced to work 16-hour shifts weeks in a row, resulting in mounting workplace accidents and even deaths.
In September, The Wall Street Journal published an investigation finding that The Line executives had reacted with callousness and casual racism when informed of multiple worker deaths that occurred because of unsafe conditions. The Journal also found a pattern of self-dealing and corruption allegations among top executives.
Upwards of 6,000 villagers have been forced from their homes near The Line construction site, reported the BBC earlier this year. Saudi human rights watchdogs say that dozens of people who've protested the evictions have been given prison sentences ranging from 15 to 50 years, and at least five protestors have been sentenced to death.
Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman unveiled The Line in 2021 as part of his grand Neom initiative to create a new, high-tech, urban megaregion in the Kingdom's remote Tabuk province.
The mounting accusations of rights violations surrounding the Neom initiative are shocking but not necessarily surprising.
Human rights groups have long criticized Saudi Arabia's terrible routine treatment of migrant workers and the "slavery-like" conditions they often toil under. It would be expected that these same abuses would show up at The Line.
Major government-backed land redevelopment schemes also typically involve the mass confiscation of land from private owners, even in free countries.
The United States government, with all its constitutional protections for private property, carved up existing neighborhoods for mid-century urban renewal projects. It's little surprise then that Saudi Arabia's theocratic monarchy has engaged in even worse rights violations of nearby villagers. This all adds an element of tragedy to what has always been a farcical project.
There is a reason no other city in the world is arranged in one big, long line: That's a really inefficient layout for an urban area.
As former World Bank economist Alain Bertaud has documented, cities in even remotely capitalist countries all look kind of the same: an ultra-dense urban core surrounded by decreasingly dense neighborhoods radiating outward.
This is a result of land prices that place a premium on city center development, where access to the rest of the urban area is easiest.
The Line screws all this up. A linear city of uniform density would have the same number of homes and amenities at every point, despite demand likely being a lot higher at the line's midpoint and a lot lower on its wings. Incredibly valuable land above and below the line is left entirely vacant.
The Line's design also calls for minutely designed neighborhoods where all the amenities of daily life are within a five-minute walk away. That would leave little room for the redevelopment and readaptation of businesses and homes in response to the changing needs of The Line residents.
In short, The Line is not something private property owners spending their own money would build. Where people do have at least a modicum of freedom to own, develop, and trade property, the built environment looks a lot different.
It's little surprising then that the people building a city with little room for future residents' individual agency have little respect for the rights of workers and existing inhabitants of the area either.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
That would leave little room for the redevelopment and readaptation of businesses and homes in response to the changing needs of The Line residents.
Why would your needs change? Everything has been planned for you by experts.
Don’t you trust the experts?
Apparently it's never occurred to the writer that center and spoke cities grew the way they did because of historical factors that changed dramatically over the decades that those cities were growing and that for every strategically located town that eventually became a big city there were hundreds of towns that did NOT grow; and that most them have disappeared as technology inexorably eliminated the reasons for the existence of small towns in the first place. None of the big cities referred to in this opinion piece were designed from the very beginning to achieve anything in particular in the imagination of the designers - they just grew that way. Perhaps after "The Line" is completed and populated, it will "just grow" or just die in a similar way as the designers drift off into the mists.
I don't get it. If we're going to build sustainable high density, super housing, there are some eggs that are going into that omelet, and those eggs are going to be broken.
FYI, that "Line" project is the hilarious culmination of WEF environmentalist bullshit and pie-in-the-sky Silicon Valley-type mindset.
It's a system where every location is literally as far away from every other location as possible. That's what happens when you put all your points on a line.
This is the type of shit that only $100 Laptop/Juicero types can dream up.
This is the type of shit that only $100 Laptop/Juicero types can dream up.
Can you believe that Trump wanted to build a wall? Crazy!
The Line reminds me of a stand-still Sand-Piercer.
Now do China.
There is a reason no other city in the world is arranged in one big, long line: that's a really inefficient layout for an urban area.
There are a ton of places - all associated with deserts - where the layout of people is linear not circular. Historically - villages are clumped around an oasis - with a path to the next oasis/village. Water - not land - is the key constraint. It makes zero sense to transport water from one place to another on a smaller scale (evaporation for one). And no oasis can have a population higher than the oasis/well/aquifer can support. Even Egypt has basically linear population density upriver of the Nile Delta - where irrigation from the Nile is the constraint. Libya was basically a coast road until they discovered the world's largest aquifer and built an underground river to the coast.
That your 'experts' couldn't even mention the obvious - water - says that you and your experts are just full of shit. The Saudis are obviously slave drivers but that has nothing to do with the design of the city.
Oh – and Saudi Arabia building highways for transportation, like everyone else would advise, just reinforces this driving habit. Call it the Enshallah mindset. No driver there has the notion that their life/death is in their control.
>Inhumane labor practices, worker deaths, and the forced eviction and repression of local residents have characterized the kingdom's efforts to build a miles-long linear skyscraper in the desert.
In other news, water is wet.
>There is a reason no other city in the world is arranged in one big, long line: that's a really inefficient layout for an urban area.
Every city that grew up along a waterway? Whole *nations* have been 'one long line' at some times.
See for example the Salt Like City metro area.
"and existing inhabitants of the area either"
AKA the Howeitat. The tribe Anthony Quinn made famous in Lawrence of Arabia.
I am Auda Abu Tayi! Does Auda serve? (Tribesmen in tent shout no, turns to ask those gathered outside) DOES AUDA SERVE?!? (Crowd yells angrily no)... I carry twenty-three great wounds, all got in battle. Seventy-five men have I killed with my own hands in battle. I scatter, I burn my enemies' tents. I take away their flocks and herds. The Turks pay me a golden treasure, yet I am poor! Because *I* am a river to my people!
Wow. Saudi Arabia is run by racists who put low value on the lives of poor immigrants. Quelle surprise. Stunning journalistic revelation that was.