The Panic Over an Imaginary Militia 'Hunting FEMA' Did More Damage Than the Actual Threat
Someone did allegedly threaten first responders, but the panic may have done more damage.

It was a bone-chilling report. As North Carolinians reeled from the aftermath of Hurricane Helene, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) suddenly ordered emergency workers "to stand down and evacuate" Rutherford County due to reports of "trucks of armed militias saying they were out hunting FEMA," The Washington Post reported on October 13, based on an email obtained from the U.S. Forest Service.
The threat turned out to be something less serious. On October 14, the Rutherford County Sheriff's Office announced the arrest of one man, William Jacob Parsons, for making a "comment about possibly harming FEMA employees" while armed with an assault rifle. Law enforcement concluded that "Parsons acted alone and there was no truck loads of militia," according to a statement quoted in The Washington Post.
Parsons told the BBC that he was not a member of any militia, he had not threatened any federal officials, and he was there to help distribute supplies to hurricane victims.
Every time America suffers a natural disaster, it seems, there's serious anxiety about social collapse and mass violence. And the media often runs with the most fantastical version, as journalists did with reports of violence at the Superdome refugee center in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005.
These rumors by themselves can do serious damage. Louisiana National Guard Maj. Ed Bush told Reason in 2005 that "perhaps FEMA would have been quicker in if we hadn't heard all these urban myths about shootings and rapes and deaths and killing and bodies everywhere." Last week, relief efforts in Rutherford County and nearby Ashe County were paused due to the alleged militia threat.
Through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, Reason has obtained the original email thread about the threat. Forest Service firefighting official Gordy Sachs, quoting a message from FEMA, did indeed write to other officials on October 12 that "Title 10 troops had come across x2 trucks of armed militia saying they were out hunting FEMA." (Both federal troops and National Guards under federal command are referred to as being under "Title 10 orders.")
The Forest Service scrambled to figure out what was really happening. "Are you aware of this? Are we engaged? Any updates to share?" Tracy Perry, the service's director of law enforcement and investigations, wrote in an email to subordinates. "This is the first I've heard of this, I spoke with some LE [law enforcement] staff around 11:30 this morning and they did not mention anything," an official, whose name and title were redacted, wrote back.
By that afternoon, officials had figured out the real story. An interim patrol commander at the Forest Service, whose name was redacted, replied to the email thread at 6:52 p.m. with a screenshot of a bulletin asking police to be on the lookout for a man who "made threats to FEMA and anyone that got in his way" and a photo of someone who appears to be Parsons.
"This has a great likelihood of [being] the earlier threat (unconfirmed)," the patrol commander wrote. The commander followed up 20 minutes later to write that "the suspect is in custody."
Only the original email talking about "trucks of armed militia" was leaked to the press. The Washington Post reported on the alleged threat on the afternoon of October 13, apparently unaware that a suspect had been identified. "Two federal officials confirmed the authenticity of the email, though it was unclear whether the quoted threat was seen as credible," the Post reported.
After Parsons' arrest was publicized, the Post updated its story to focus on his alleged threat, and removed the phrase "armed militia" from the headline. As it turns out, U.S. soldiers had called in the threat—after hearing about it secondhand from a gas station cashier. "This was a lone individual," Rutherford County Sheriffs Office Capt. James Keever told the Post. "We're trying to get the word out about that."
But other news outlets had already start to run with the story. "Trump's Hurricane Lies Spark Terrifying Threat," The New Republic stated, blaming former president Donald Trump's criticism of FEMA for the alleged militia menace. In its own coverage of the militia threat, The Guardian reported that the "politicization" of the hurricane relief effort "has provided a recruitment opportunity for white supremacist groups who have assembled in devastated regions." The Daily Beast featured a photo of an actual militia atop its coverage.
Rep. Chuck Edwards (R–N.C.) told NBC News that two counties in North Carolina were reporting "different militias attacking and threatening FEMA."
On the ground, the picture looked quite different. People mostly stepped up to help each other and their communities. Volunteer aid organizations distributed supplies across North Carolina and the surrounding states. Reason did witness a militia-like operation near Asheville—but rather than attacking relief workers, the "redneck air force" was cooperating with authorities to run helicopter flights to isolated towns.
And rather than a terrifying plague of misinformation, at least one local official sees anti-FEMA conspiracy theories as mostly an annoyance.
"As far as I know, social media rumors did not impair response. They do tend to be a distraction, but my concern was that folks might quit helping if they thought their efforts were being undermined. That didn't happen," Glenn Jacobs, the mayor of Knox County, Tennessee, told Reason. Jacobs says recovery efforts following Hurricane Helene "once again showed how local communities come together to help their neighbors even before government is mobilized. I saw a lot of that."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
One guy has been alleged to have made threats. He should be given a fair trial, if it proceeds that far, and punished accordingly if guilty. Compare any major blue city’s homicide rate over the same time period.
It fit the metrosexual narrative of folks that haven’t lived in rural America. Holy smokes, mountain boys carrying sidearms!
It also allowed Biden-Harris to chaff/redirect away from another abysmal performance where they again failed the American people.
And another hat tip: Eric earned his potatoes by visiting the area, talking with folks, observing, and writing a fine article about that experience.
If you read the entire article, the original rumor was third hand from someone who talked to a gas station attendant. If he was hunting FEMA it might have been to offer to help just like hundreds of other volunteers. Imagine the trial where the gas station attendant tells the jury that the accused looks like the guy who told him he was hunting FEMA and try to guess whether that jury will be willing to punish him for something that might or might not have been a vaguely threatening comment to a random stranger.
Honestly don't see how they can take this guy to trial. Even if he was purportedly overheard to say "I'm gonna go save these hillbillies and if FEMA tries to stop me I'm gonna fuck them up" it's hearsay about a pre crime that never happened.
It fit the metrosexual narrative of folks that haven’t lived in rural America. Holy smokes, mountain boys carrying sidearms!
There's also the handy fact that "Trump inspired armed militias!" distracts from yet another "Government incompetence angers victims." story.
Your issue is never the issue. Their issue is never the issue. Their issue is to distract you from their need for more power and control.
I love how they "debunked" the stories about Haitians but never seemed able to debunk this.
Weird. I guess bad things are more believable about Americans.
He wrote an excellent article, then he followed up with this POS.
https://reason.com/2024/10/24/where-is-trumps-plan-to-cut-spending/
Check out the first comment on that article.
From the article:
Forest Service firefighting official Gordy Sachs, quoting a message from FEMA, did indeed write to other officials on October 12 that "Title 10 troops had come across x2 trucks of armed militia saying they were out hunting FEMA."
So, this guy lied, he didn't see two trucks, and countless NC citizens were denied the Federal response they deserved... Sounds like a crime to me, I hope this official will be made to feel some pressure/professional loss for his careless statements.
This situation deserves AT A MINIMUM an equal amount of official outrage as "CBP horsemen 'whipping' Haitian Migrants" story, don't you think?
There were numerous threats and there have been reports of militia operating in the impacted areas. Whether there's any connection between the threats and those militia hasn't been established. That doesn't make FEMA's caution unwarranted.
re: "There were numerous threats..."
Citation, please. According to this article, there was precisely one. What is your evidence that there were multiple threats?
Note that mouthing off at a petty bureaucrat who is getting in the way of actually helping people does not count as a credible threat.
The left believes words are violence.
And that unsubstantiated rumors from ‘anonymous sources’ are fact.
That's only when somebody criticizes them. When they themselves commit violent acts, it's free speech.
Tie up your man bun and get back to your Brooklyn coffee house.
Militias operating (helping) in the impacted areas is EXACTLY what militias are supposed to do, you fucking urban halfwit.
There were numerous threats and there have been reports of militia operating in the impacted areas.
Stop lying. There were no threats, and any "militias" were just locals helping each other out in the wake of a disaster. Not militias, but I realize your side thinks any group of people that won't let your fellow progressives loot and steal shit is a "militia."
Militias are not illegal and there is nothing inherently bad about them. They can "operate" in many ways that are perfectly legal and peaceful.
According to the Dems, militias are apparently the thing that's actually protected by the 2nd amendment, and members are the only ones who should be allowed to own or carry guns.
All the brewhaha about the threats wasn't meant to be factual. It was meant to make Trump look bad because dems equate the militia to Trump fans. Look what Trump's people are doing!
The MSM should be ashamed of themselves but don't hold your breath waiting for an apology or any significant change in their deplorable behavior. Any politicization of the disaster is more on them than any comments Trump might have made criticizing FEMA. If FEMA would stick to their original mandate - maintaining mobile communications and medical response resources to help coordinate relief efforts, they would do just fine and be above reproach.
Government desires control. They don't want citizens to outdo them in the I can take care of you game.
These Acela vermin were really pissed that people they considered to be a bunch of dumb rednecks were coordinating assistance better than their beloved federal government.
Exactly right.
The point was to distract from FEMA's bungling response. It was all lies from the get go. But it sells with the low information crowd.
Look, if the DEI snowflake left imagines something negative, especially as a threat, we have to take official action--and echo it as "truth" in the official state media.
But if the nasty MAGA right imagines something negative, especially if it casts the state in a bad light, we have to engage all official denial offices--and push the "conspiracy" button in the media production facilities.
MAGA right imagines something negative
I suppose imagining a government that cleans up in the wake of a hurricane beyond commensurate with taxation is imaginary and *kind of* a negative…
Edit: I guess you weren't talking about imagining this specific situation but, even then, the amount of "conspiracy theory as future past" that's gone on in the last couple years leaves me scratching my head a bit as to "imagines something negative". I suppose, maybe, as many Haitians didn't eat as many cats as imagined.
ctrl-f "Kane" 0/0
No mention that Mayor Glenn Jacobs had a previous career or significant note?
I think he used to be a dentist.
Also, very briefly, both a Christmas-based monster and also a copy of another wrestler.
Nor that he is libertarian.
He isn’t openly gay and a closet progressive so can’t grace the pixels of this website.
Any story that furthers the anti-MAGA, anti-redneck narrative will get wide exposure
And we believe FEMA that this threat actually happened?
oh no! defend the feds at all costs?
A bit of gas lighting here. This could all have gone away if Trump had said he was wrong and just stopped repeating lies. It's not fair for a presidential candidate to spread obvious lies and then expect everyone to roll over and ignore it. That may be wise advice from a tactical standpoint but he knows how to push buttons and he knows it will yield lame articles like this that will eventually come around to hurt his opponents more than him. This is why we are tired of Trump and need to not vote for him.
Biden shat the bed on the hurricane response. It is simple reality. He could not have handled it worse than he did.
Just think, if you didn't cheat in 2020, you'd be just about done with Trump entirely right now.
>>Just think, if you didn’t cheat in 2020, you’d be just about done with Trump entirely right now.
should be at the top of this website.
Go back on your meds. If it's lies, just look at the Democrats. When they get caught, it takes weeks for the media to notice, if they notice at all. Just look at the story about the murdered soldier. A Liberal journalist spouted lies about Trump's response. The soldier's family denies that it happened, but, the media spread it all over the place.
LOL, the projection from this shitlib can be seen from Pluto.
For a minute I thought you were talking about Tampon Tim, the compulsive liar and fraud.
FEMA has demonstrated its incompetence once again, and once again I'll say it needs to be defunded and disbanded.
Let the states handle their own catastrophes.
They don't need one catastrophe, like a hurricane, to be added on to another catastrophe like FEMA.
Indeed!
That FEMA threatened to arrest anyone who dared attempt rescue and relief operations outside of their authority apparently has escaped some.
The same thing happened after Katrina.
Now that after a few weeks, we have seen plenty of evidence that homegrown militia volunteers and local groups have been far more efficient at getting relief and rescue than the FEMA bureaucrats.
Remember, government is not efficient nor is it capable of making it so.
I salute all those hard working local groups who showed what real volunteerism and dedication to helping their neighbors recover.
FEMA
Funneling
Emergency
Money
to Aliens
F***FEMA,
F***Mayorcass
FJB
FKH
FGW
>while armed with an assault rifle
Magazine-fed, intermediate caliber, select-fire rifle? Really?
Or was it a semi-auto 'patrol rifle'?
Do you know the difference?
It goes beyond a terrorist threat, which is a crime whether carried out or not. The crime is in making the threat....and claiming you were joking is no defense if people are, as is the case here, terrified. But it does beyond to the fact that Trump and his propaganda team were lying to discredit Fema and thus disrupt its efforts to help. IN fact, Trump refused to denounce the terrorist threat, which in itself could easily cause panic and hurt the relief effort. Clearly the Trump team wanted panic...why else spread rumors and lies?
"Trump refuses to denounce threats to FEMA, doubles down on falsehoods."
SWANNANOA, N.C. — Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump declined to condemn violent threats to Federal Emergency Management Agency workers providing relief to Americans impacted by Hurricane Helene, instead criticizing the government’s storm response using false allegations.
Asked during a news conference here about whether the former president is harming the recovery effort after a man was arrested for threatening federal relief workers this month, Trump responded by repeating falsehoods, including those the suspect said motivated him. Trump did not offer any concern for the workers’ safety or a denunciation of violence."
We have, in this failure to denounce threats and spreading lies to discredit FEMA for political purposes me the true Enemy Within.
Why is it his job to denounce what you allege are falsehoods?
It goes beyond a terrorist threat, which is a crime whether carried out or not.
Since there wasn't a terrorist threat, there's nothing to worry about, shitlib.
Was it an InSuRrEcTiOn?
Has anyone actually seen a transcript or video of the alleged threat? Do we know if the alleged threat was actually credible at the time in context? That someone may have been afraid is not sufficient for credibility. I was once accused of making a violent threat in response to an old friend’s question about a productive fishing hole. My response: “If I told you, I’d have to kill you.” Seriously. Even after my friend said it wasn’t a threat but a joke, the third party would not relent.
Yeah, FeebleMA is the unappreciated hero. How would you like to have private citizens vowing to do what you can't do? I was just reading where a bunch of West Virginia coal miners built a road to Chimney Rock WV in a week that FeebleMA said would take a year. The horror! The horror! But the coal miners weren't lubbertarians, so the road doesn't count.