Through the Finish Line
Plus: Puberty blockers study suppressed by doctors, organ donation on the rise, and more...

Anyone's race: "The candidates are statistically tied among likely voters in each of the seven swing states in the Bloomberg News/Morning Consult poll, with the razor-thin margins in these battlegrounds underscoring how the final blitz of advertising, rallies and door-knocking campaigns could decide who claims the White House," reports Bloomberg. "Across all seven states, the candidates are in a dead heat, with 49% support each among likely voters. The poll's overall statistical margin of error is 1 percentage point."
In Arizona and North Carolina, Donald Trump is leading by a tiny margin, still very much within the margin of error so it doesn't even really mean much; in Georgia, Trump and Kamala Harris are tied, per Marist College polls released overnight. Quinnipiac polls released yesterday show that Harris leads Trump 49 percent to 46 percent among likely voters in Michigan. In Wisconsin, the two are tied.
Though the economy is still the No. 1 issue for voters, they're becoming a bit more bullish: "About two-thirds of swing-state likely voters say the economy is on the wrong track, down 5 points from a year ago," notes Bloomberg. Fewer swing-staters say that they've noticed price increases over the past month compared with how many noticed price increases when asked a year ago.
No concessions: On Tuesday, NBC News' Hallie Jackson asked Kamala Harris what "specific concessions" she would be willing to make with the GOP in order to pass nationwide abortion legislation if she's elected president—for example, not forcing Catholic hospitals to provide abortions and other religious exemptions for those who oppose the procedure. Harris responded: "I don't think we should be making concessions when we're talking about a fundamental freedom to make decisions about your own body."
"It's a question that's out there because it's not a guarantee that Democrats will win control of Congress," followed up Jackson. Harris again declined to answer. "I'm not going to go down that rabbit hole with you right now," she said, saying at one point that she wouldn't entertain hypotheticals. "Let's start with the fundamental fact. A basic freedom has been taken from the women of America, the freedom to make decisions about their own body. And that cannot be negotiable, which is that we need to put back in the protections of Roe v. Wade, and that is it." There's something very Biden-esque about how Harris seemed almost pissed off at the question itself.
Regardless of your thoughts on abortion, this answer is bad for two reasons: One, she's failing to extend olive branches to moderates, and two, she's already a bit harmed by the correct public perception that she lacks legitimate policymaking experience. Embracing pragmatism and signaling that she'd be able to work well with a Republican Congress might be a smart move for Harris.
Does Harris have a closing pitch? I've been searching far and wide for what Harris' pitch to voters is as early voting starts and election day nears. Though her campaign has been short, spanning basically three months (August, September, and October), she's struggled to formulate a clear message other than that she's the candidate of joy. At times, she's distanced herself from her earlier run for president and the progressive causes du jour she championed back then; she has mostly pitched her policy priorities as a continuation of Joe Biden's agenda, just more, while also emphasizing that she's pretty law-and-ordery and a champion of abortion rights.
Her pick of Tim Walz, governor of Minnesota, showed she wanted an attack dog able to go after the Trump/Vance ticket, versus a pragmatic pick like Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, who could've shored up a swing state, but then her campaign mostly…hid the buffoonish Midwesterner from the media, with him doing very few cable news hits following his selection. And Walz does little to reassure voters that the Harris ticket has the requisite foreign policy experience, so it feels a bit like a miscalculation.
For a while, it seemed like she was shying away from sitting for broadcast interviews and doing splashy media hits, but now she's been making the rounds: The View, Telemundo, a Fox News interview, the Gen Z podcast Call Her Daddy, Charlamagne tha God. "Harris rocked the media blitz that big media mocked" reads a questionably accurate headline from The Nation. But simply appearing on shows is different than doing a good job on them, and Harris has been at times stiff and overscripted, at other times overly giggly and just kind of incomprehensible.
"So Harris is campaigning on personality, and Trump is campaigning on…policy?" writes Nate Silver on his Substack, articulating some of the challenges with Harris' campaign focus. "Not in a wonky, Buttigiegian way, obviously. But at least there are some CLEAR GOALS ARTICULATED IN ALL CAPS rather than Harris's triangulated language." Silver continues:
"This is why it's not surprising that Harris does comparatively better in favorability ratings than in head-to-head polls—and also why I don't particularly think there's any reason to expect that gap to close. Her message is: I'm a likable person, and I'm not Trump, and you'll just have to trust me to sort out the details. His is: I'm an asshole who fights for you, and here's a bunch of stuff you'll get if you vote for me. It's the Billboard Lawyer message—and there's a 53 percent chance it will work."
Scenes from New York: City council is currently weighing a bill that would force employers in NYC to let paid sick leave be used by employees to…take their pets to the vet or "be with them during surgery."
Introduced by Councilman Shaun Abreu, a Democrat representing Manhattan, this bill makes me want to jump off a cliff, mostly because pets are not the same as humans and we should stop this cultural slide toward pretending they are.
QUICK HITS
- Doctors held off on publishing an important study that revealed their findings on puberty blockers because they feared how it would be used politically. "I do not want our work to be weaponized," said Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy, who runs the U.S.'s largest youth gender clinic at the Children's Hospital of Los Angeles. The study, which has received large sums of money from the National Institutes of Health (totaling almost $10 million in federal support), found that puberty blockers did not actually seem to help transgender kids' mental health. The fact that they held off on publishing the study ought to be a huge scandal; doctors should be working to do no harm, and to provide accurate information based on their clinical findings, not to service a particular political agenda.
- "The Los Angeles Times' editorials editor resigned Wednesday after the newspaper's plans to endorse Vice President Kamala Harris in the presidential election were blocked by billionaire owner Patrick Soon-Shiong," reports Axios. Soon-Shiong has decided that the paper should not endorse any candidate this time around.
- "For the first time, the share of eligible New Yorkers who have signed up to be organ donors has passed 50 percent," reports The New York Times.
- Have you ever made a mistake that you learned from, asked Anderson Cooper of Vice President Kamala Harris in a CNN Town Hall. "I worked very hard at making sure I'm well-versed on issues and I think that is very important, it's a mistake to not be well-versed on an issue and feel compelled to answer a question."
hey Siri: Why isn't Kamala performing better with the masses?
Siri: watch this clip from tonight's CNN town hall pic.twitter.com/iYAgUXz8Yi
— Justin Hart (@justin_hart) October 24, 2024
- Import PSA from my dear friend (and sometimes Reason writer) Nancy Rommelmann:
Buy my book! https://t.co/UpA6hHeNFs pic.twitter.com/OXSBSCMe6v
— Nancy Rommelmann (@NancyRomm) October 24, 2024
- Bill Ackman on Harris vice presidential contender Tim Walz: "I can't imagine a world in which this guy is president of the United States." (Watch here.)
- Yes:
name one innovation that came out of singapore aside from lee kuan yew vibe reels https://t.co/pJSNVYaxZy
— roon (@tszzl) October 23, 2024
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fuck Buddies
The USA, Germany, Slovakia, Hungary, Spain, Belgium and Slovenia secretly or openly oppose inviting Ukraine to NATO.
- Politico
NAFO only wants you for the occasional putin.
There is no reason whatsoever to invite UKR into NATO. NFW!
Omg
So many Hitler like MAGA governments in Europe.
NAFO
Not Allied? Fuck Off.
If only.
That's because no one with a brain wants to go to war with Russia over a bunch of holhol retards or to get Victoria Nuland and Robert Kagan their Black Sea villa in Crimea back for them.
The candidates are statistically tied among likely voters in each of the seven swing states
That doesn’t seem realistic.
Is that based on 100% of potential voters, or 110%?
220, 221 whatever it takes.
"... and I heard champagne chilling in the background."
"you heard that?"
On RCP, Harris's national poll lead is down to 0.2% and Trump leads in 3 of the last four national polls. Not saying he's going to win the popular vote but those numbers should be making Harris supporters run for the hills. Additionally, the approve percentages are narrowing, with the approve less than a percentage point different, Harris's disapproval is still better than Trump's, however Trump is gaining in approval while she's losing approval and gaining in disapproval. Furthermore, recent polling shows a plurality of Americans now consider the Democrats a bigger threat to democracy than Republicans.
Kamala is not acting like a candidate who is in a good position to win. Her joy schtick is dead and buried and her new cunt persona is in full effect.
ouch! the C-word - thats such a nasty word!
A-B-Face persona is probably a little softer.
That is not a new persona.
Dude, where’s my money?
The U.S. government’s aid math is as brutal as it is revealing. For every American taxpayer, $750 is allocated for Hurricane Helene survivors—people who’ve lost homes, livelihoods, and even lives. But for Ukraine and Israel? It’s $1,526 and $2,381 per capita, respectively.
- The Islander
Seeing as the illegals are only getting about $150B/yr, maybe less foreign subsidizing is in order to boost more money for the imports.
Disclaimer: I didn’t check The Islander’s maths.
New rule: instead of collecting taxes in advance, the feds have to come door-to-door for each major spending initiative. It would be fun to watch them trying to collect for Ukraine and Israel.
One of my tax reform schemes was that Congress passes budgets like they're supposed to, and when you file your taxes, you specify which agencies get how much. If that exceeds Congress's budget, the excess is returned to taxpayers proportionally. If it's less than Congress authorized, whoops, too bad, so sad, fire employees, sell assets, but you ain't getting any other agency's surplus.
And if Congress doesn't pass budgets, agencies get zero. No continuing resolutions, no jail time or other punishment for Congress critters. Just no funding.
Siri: watch this clip from tonight's CNN town hall pic.twitter.com/iYAgUXz8Yi
Holy crap, what an empty suit.
Why is she wearing a lapel mic if she is holding and using a hand microphone?
It reminds her of a cock?
Did she spit on that thang?
Empty pant suit.
Ok, I actually watched the clip. What a nothing answer. "Oh, my greatest weakness? I care too much!" vibes.
I don't view that as a nothing answer. It's a way of saying she will empower the nanny state.
Nanny logic:
1. I care about you.
2. I own your ass.
Nannies!?! Asses!?! Where??? ~~ Dougie
Her response to an audience question about what she considered her weaknesses was similarly, um, weird.
She is an empty vessel. Everytime she speaks, she bleeds votes of sane, rational voters.
Hence the three month campaign, which was three months longer than her team would’ve preferred.
If she wins, it proves the fucking Democrats can put anyone in the White House.
Quick! To the Bat Cave, er, Biden Basement!
BRICS and Mortar
JUST IN: BRICS officially adds 13 new nations to the alliance as partner countries (not full members).
Algeria
Belarus
Bolivia
Cuba
Indonesia
Kazakhstan
Malaysia
Nigeria
Thailand
Turkey
Uganda
Uzbekistan
Vietnam
- Bernama et. al.
The boomerang effects of Biden-Harris weaponizing the dollar and pushing the globohomo unipolar agenda.
Indonesia is significant.
Maybe, but BRICS still looks like a combination of the short bus kids and the weirdos who spend all day in the empty lot behind the school.
How so? The namesakes of BRICS are pretty big deals.
The idea that India, China, and Russia will ever stay together in any long-lasting partnership is ludicrous, let alone that they will ever agree on any coherent planning or strategic goals.
Yeah, didn't China and India just end a low intensity shooting war on their border, and have fought over aforementioned border three times since India gained its independence? Also, historically the Chinese and Russians haven't agreed on their border, and both have heavily militarized it. It's one of the things that led to the breakdown in relations between the USSR and Mao.
Mao was a Stalinist and Khrushchev fostered in de-Stalinization which moved away from the Beijing view of communism. That is when the rift formalized. There were also disagreements regrading transfer of technology. Though neither country had 10 million invaders come in and do $150B/yr of damage.
There were also some very hostile border issues, as in actual combat, just not labeled a war. Sort of like between Imperial Japan and the Soviets in the late 1930s. Or the PRC and Vietnam in the late 1970 until the mid 1980s.
And further back to the opiums wars when Russia took Northern Manchuria.
And yes China and India have been in recent border conflicts. And Thailand, Vietnam and Indonesia, have been in conflict with China (no shooting yet) over the South China Sea.
You nailed it and why I posted that. Turkey is interesting too, but Jakarta participating is important.
These are the ones who are the most notable--Indonesia, Turkey, Vietnam, Nigeria, and to a lesser extent Thailand.
This is an alliance setting itself up as a bulwark against the post-Cold War NWO that's been run by the US and Brussels.
We were very close to normalizing relationships with Vietnam and close to using them as a bulwark against China just four years ago.
If I had to make a list of Americans that give a shit about what countries are in BRIC it would mainly be Pentagon-types, economists, and maybe the odd person involved in international shipping. If I excluded all the people from that list who would be unlikely to use the word "globohomo" on an internet comment thread I wonder who I would be left with.
Yeah, I know. You dumbasses never see the train coming until it runs you over, even after it's spent the previous half-mile blowing its horn at you.
Things happen gradually until they happen quickly and then 00bdragon wakes up shouting WTF?!
Bragging about your ignorance is an interesting approach.
The asshole has much to be humble about.
If I had to make a list of Americans who could find Ukraine on a map your name would not appear.
JD Vance is wrong about cartography
The multipolar world is here.
The US should cut it's losses and abandon globohomo.
The US can't abandon it because they're the ones who set it up in the first place.
“Puberty blockers don’t help kids”, a shock to nobody with a brain.
Are you accusing jeffsarc of brainlessness?
No one ever accused them of having a brain
That is true.
Sarc has a brain. But it’s pickled.
Cirrhosis of the brain.
The study, which has received large sums of money from the National Institutes of Health (totaling almost $10 million in federal support), found that puberty blockers did not actually seem to help transgender kids' mental health.
But do they help parents with their virtue signaling?
Nothing says progressive allegiance like a trans kid.
They allow a barely-legal teenager to continue to appear to be a child. That's why they're so intriguing to...some people.
They aren’t for the children. They are for the MAPedo groomers that have ejaculatory fantasies.
ejaculatory fantasies.
But if they feel bad about it afterwards, no harm, no foul.
Every medical "study" found to be falsified or deliberately suppressed; everyone involved should be publicly executed. The irreversible harm should have the gravest of consequences.
I dunno about execution, but the people who suppressed this should face some kind of sanction, whether financial or imprisonment, or both.
I am OK with execution, but would settle for massive hormone treatments for all these assholes.
I'd have trouble arguing against castration on strictly logical grounds.
Might as well, the whole WPATH enterprise was based off of posts from a Usenet castration fetish forum.
Couldn't we return to one of the classics? Like making them into eunuchs and selling them into slavery?
Too many would enjoy that.
The key word is deliberately.
Yeah, execution might be a bit much. Never getting published or getting any grants again would be a good start. And all previous publications should be carefully examined.
How about shot in both kneecaps and elbows so they have seriously limited mobility and constant life long pain. Like what their work does to others
We should definitely fund someone 10M to find out the effects of that on these researchers.
I might go with that, in lieu of execution.
I could be convinced.
Just sew them all ass to mouth.
+1 Human Centipede.
Just to see that would leave some in stitches.
Just get them to agree to it by burying it in the next user-agreement for Apple.
I'm not sure many of them would view that as punishment.
Every medical “study” found to be falsified or deliberately suppressed; everyone involved should be publicly executed. The irreversible harm should have the gravest of consequences.
I’d argue their fears of retribution were put to rest, largely in part, by the lack of consequences paid by our country’s Covid response architects.
Imagine if this were Chevy hiding a study on the effectiveness of their air bag system. But no one wants to talk about it.
The only people on the left that I see talking about this are a lot of gay activists who believe that the Trans agenda basically has hijacked the gay rights movement and directed many gay kids to making lasting changes to their body that will drastically impact their sexual health going forward.
gay activists who believe that the Trans agenda basically has hijacked the gay rights movement and directed many gay kids to making lasting changes to their body that will drastically impact their sexual health going forward.
I wouldn't exactly call it a "belief".
M to F transgenderism is a genocide against gay boys.
Remember, this whole issue is just religious conservatives morally panicking about who uses which bathroom.
Turns out the mission creep was a trans activist.
I don't believe the reason was political.
The reason was financial. They want that sweet sweet ball shriveling money.
It can be both.
Well, duh. Even if puberty blockers worked exactly as the tranny lobby claims, they would be objectively harmful.
Just here to work.
The data, covering roughly 13 years from June 1, 2011, through Sept. 30, 2024, represents “the minimum number of crimes associated with criminal illegal noncitizens” charged with committing state offenses.
...
In the first category, criminal noncitizens previously known to DHS, more than 443,000 were booked into local Texas jails during the timeframe evaluated. The majority, 314,000, were in the country illegally.
The 314,000 were charged with more than 546,000 criminal offenses, according to the report. They include arrests for homicide (1,011), assault (70,230), burglary (9,787), drugs (63,886), kidnapping (1,292), theft (27,520), obstructing police (42,581), robbery (3,123), sexual assault (6,943), sexual offense (7,953) and weapons (6,748).
These charges resulted in more than 200,000 convictions.
During this timeframe, more than 32,000 in the second category were incarcerated by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Among them, 10,738 weren’t identified through DHS’s Secure Communities program at the time of their arrest.
The 10,738 criminal illegal foreign nationals incarcerated in TDCJ facilities were charged with more than 10,000 criminal offenses, according to the report. They include arrests for homicide (134), assault (1,294), burglary (573), drugs (1,809), kidnapping (57), theft (517), obstructing police (950), robbery (375), sexual assault (834), sexual offense (397), and weapons (244).
These criminal charges resulted in more than 5,000 convictions, according to DPS records.
That is one state.
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/texas-dps-over-443000-criminal-noncitizens-booked-texas-jails
Jeffy will waddle in shortly to say “nuh uh” using five paragraphs with enough verbiage to make a junior high school teacher cringe.
He has actually been trying to accuse me of conflating legal and illegal. He will likely fo so here. Despite his ignorance that visas for legal migrants include not committing crimes.
He’s projecting and delusional.
Interesting statistics you have there, but they don't mean a lot on their own. The data takes a 13-year window of incarceration in Texas prisons and then counts all the charges and convictions applied to anyone incarcerated during that time regardless of when they were charged and convicted or the crimes were committed. It doesn't say anything at all about overall criminality.
For example, the data from Texas DPS lists that 508 criminal homicide convictions resulted from this population. Even if we assume that each of those 508 murders was committed by a single separate illegal and no illegal was convicted of multiple homicides, that would still render the number of murders by illegals vanishingly small compared to the population as a whole. Texas has had a murder rate of around4.5/100k for most of the period you are looking at. If you just multiply the murder rate for 2011 through 2018 by the population and extrapolate through 2024 you'd estimate about 16,500 murder convictions in the state, which would mean that illegals are committing about 3% of the murders in the state despite making up 5% of the population.
Do correct me if I've gone off base here or I'm using a bad statistic.
Your attempts to rationalize the data away are off base, yes.
Please explain how.
For example your argument it could be 1 person committing 508 murders or 508 people committing 1 murder. I is nonsense.
If a murderer had donated to Act Blue, then they are a conservative.
I would still need some more evidence before declaring them conservatives. Now, if one had a Biden-Harris bumper sticker, it would be indisputable proof of his conservatism.
For the purposes of argument I made the general assumption that each of the 508 murder convictions was a single dead person killed by a single perpetrator. This is a concession to "immigrants are causing crime" argument. If a single person kills multiple people they get multiple convictions, one for each dead person. If multiple people kill one person, then you get more murder convictions than dead people.
So what's the argument here? The "508 convicted illegal immigrant murderers = 508 murders" is a theoretical upper bound. The reality is certainly lower than that. If two illegal immigrants kill one person, they collectively get two murder convictions but there's still only one dead person, meaning that the "508 murders" is overselling how likely you are to get killed by an illegal alien. If one illegal immigrant kills two people, that means a smaller percentage of illegal aliens is a dangerous killer.
Now, granted, not all murder cases solved, not by a long shot. According to Google, the Dallas PD cleared 78% of murder cases in 2020. So if we assume that rate holds for the whole state (generous, I think, given the clown show that the DPD regularly demonstrates itself to be), that means roughly 22% of immigrant-caused murder cases go unsolved meaning there's probably ~100 more immigrant murders than the "conviction-only" statistic would show, but even with this padding, immigrant-caused murder isn't even getting close to the general population rate.
Another own goal by JesseAz.
Total arrests in a single year in Texas ranged from close to 900,000 in the earlier years of your time period to slightly under 800,000 recently. Let’s say 850,000 x 13 years = 11,000,000 arrests, plus or minus. (Source is Texas DPS, same place JesseAz got his numbers).
So, 11,000,000 arrests, 443,000 of which were non-citizens. So about 4% of crimes by non-citizens and 96% by citizens.
Non-citizens are about 9% of the population in Texas.
Thank you for proving that Fiona Harrigan is completely right and admitting that you’ve been completely wrong.
(Let me predict: after having paraded and used the DPS numbers, you'll now claim they underreported the non-citizen status and their numbers are trash.)
I’m amazed you think this is an own goal Mike. How so?
Oh. Because citizens commit crimes too so we should just accept crimes committed by legal and illegal immigrants. Despite the latter being on conditional visas revolving around not committing crimes as a condition.
Do you even listen to your idiotic self Mike?
These are additive crimes. Crimes don’t normalize year to year.
Unless your policy ask is to deport citizens who aren’t here illegally or on conditional visas.
You democrats say really retarded things to justify your beliefs.
Your argument is: Americans commit crimes so therefore open borders.
Pretty retarded argument.
Nice try. Well, actually no, it’s a pathetic try.
The false claim over and over again has been that non-citizens are disproportionately violent. This claim is absolutely central to the Trump and Vance campaigns. Don’t pretend that you don’t play along with this false claim, we’ve all seen your posts here. Your own numbers – that you weren’t smart enough to think about before posting – prove that it’s all a big lie.
That’s why it’s a gigantic own goal.
Your “additive” argument is an additional own goal, you innumerate buffoon. You don’t even understand that A+B = B+A. You can’t say one number in a sum is the only one that is “added”. US citizens ADDED 10.55M crimes while non-citizens ADDED 0.45M crimes.
Also, your whole damn argument proves too much. Since you’re unaware of that concept, let me explain: If we believed your pitifully flawed logic, it would be an argument to place restrictions on citizen childbirth. Because if we allow you and your wife bring a new kid into the country through her birth canal, that one kid is statistically more likely to add more crimes than one kid brought in across the border.
That’s according to your own numbers and “additive” argument.
Finally, I'm well aware that there are other arguments for why you and your wife should be entitled to inflict your more criminal brat on the rest of us, while we exclude the less criminal kid from Central America. But those arguments don't have anything to do with reducing the crime rate, or even total crime, because again your own numbers we could reduce crime more by deporting you and your family than deporting a family of illegal immigrants.
The false claim over and over again has been that non-citizens are disproportionately violent.
False. This is the strawman of the left to handwaive away negative externalities of their open borders desire. But even then I can point to the Lott study. And you’d have to normalize population crime by population size. Something you did not do in your retarded attempt.
This claim is absolutely central to the Trump and Vance campaigns.
Again false. Another strawman of the left. Their claims are illegals commit crimes. It is independent of normalized statistics. Why lie Mike?
Don’t pretend that you don’t play along with this false claim, we’ve all seen your posts here.
Again another lie by you. I have stated repeated times that crimes are additive. Look at right above for yet another example. Why lie Mike?
I could keep going through this but you are committing the same lies as Jeff.
You denormalize data. Why? Higher populations commit more total numbers. Only idiots try to use this to justify it.
What we never see from you and Jeff, Mike, is admitting these costs exist and presenting an argument as to why the benefits outweigh the costs. Jeff tried once with a 30 year old Brookings paper showing they would be a benefit after 15 years.
What we always see from you, Mike, is lies and strawman arguments to dismiss costs and negative externalities.
And this proves you’re fucking retarded right here:
Your “additive” argument is an additional own goal, you innumerate buffoon. You don’t even understand that A+B = B+A.
Your retarded assumption is total number of crimes is fixed. If you weren’t a retard, Mike, you would not use a transitive property that assumes equality and realize:
If A > 0 and B > 0 then A+B>A.
You are fucking retarded Mike. Please never try to explain math again. You’ve made two fundamental mistakes in 2 posts. You’re truly fucking retarded.
It is amazing how retarded you democrats are. Lol.
Mike is no cawlculus professor.
A report released by the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) last Wednesday regarding the top 50 election threats that the U.S. is facing includes mail-in ballots on the list. “Voting by mail, also known as automatic absentee voting, is very convenient but can pose serious risks to election integrity,” according to the GAI report.
“Ballots can be lost in the mail or manipulated, and a secure chain of custody is impossible to guarantee. Twenty percent of poll respondents who voted by mail admitted to committing at least one kind of fraud. These are very difficult to verify, even when you require matching signature verification. Ballots can arrive late and raise difficult questions about when vote counting will conclude.”
In 2005, the bipartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform – which included ex-President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State under President George H. W. Bush, James Baker – highlighted the issues that concerned them about absentee ballots.
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/hillsdale-college-vp-receives-dc-mail-ballot-michigan-residence-voter-who
Seriously, the biggest risk with mail-in ballots is the complete lack of assurance of who actually filled in all the little bubbles.
Appantly D.C. ballots have ended up as far away as Michigan.
There's also the notion that mail-in ballots are handled by members of the NALC.
"The nation’s 290,000 active and retired city letter carriers represented by the National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC) are proud to announce our endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris and Governor Tim Walz to serve as the next president and vice president of the United States.
Imagine if they had endorsed Trump? Seems to me that no Democrat would allow a single mail-in ballot to count.
2020-2022: The abjectly stupid years.
Masks, lockdowns, 6 ft. of separation, 'vaccines', mail in voting... the only missing "insanely impossible thing that everyone just decided was not just credible by 100% real on evidence obviously fabricated in the moment" was a radio broadcast of a martian invasion (complete with alien autopsy video).
Seems like there was a lot of anal probing going on. Figuratively of course.
2020-2022: The abjectly stupid years.
Two weeks.
2020, 2020 won, and 2020 too
I think I already mentioned it, but I got a text with a link to get a Pennsylvania absentee ballot. I live in Michigan.
Did you ever even live in PA?
If you did it shows they haven’t purged voter rolls for a while. If you haven’t lived in PA previously, it’s an even bigger red flag to all the shenanigans going on.
Never lived there.
simply appearing on shows is different than doing a good job on them, and Harris has been at times stiff and overscripted, at other times overly giggly and just kind of incomprehensible. ...
Her message is: I'm a likable person, and I'm not Trump, and you'll just have to trust me to sort out the details.
Well said.
I didn't know sarc was female.
https://x.com/realJoelFischer/status/1848892666391441778
"Are you the one that walks by here and always screaming at people?"
"No, I haven't walked by recently."
Lmao
+1 Forget religion teaching people specific wrong answers to specific, worldly/heady questions as dogma. These people's mixture of public education and pseudo-religion has *specifically* trained them to give anything *but* a/the right or even useful answer to *any* question.
Can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman’?” Blackburn asked.
“Can I provide a definition?” Jackson repeated the question.
“Mmhmm, yeah,” Blackburn confirmed.
“I can’t,” Jackson replied.
“You can’t?” Blackburn asked.
“Not — in this context, I’m not a biologist,” Jackson laughed.
“So you believe the meaning of the word ‘woman’ is so unclear and controversial that you can’t give me a definition?” Blackburn continued to press.
And then Republicans still voted to confirm her.
Well, sort of.
Susan Collins R-Maine
Lisa Murkowski R-Alaska
Mitt Romney R-Utah
Good point.
They are republicans like a man is a woman.
Woman In Name Only? WINO.
So that is sarc in the OP video.
She seems rational.
Early onset TDS.
Why is it always similar-looking white women?
That's not Sarc. She doesn't look drunk enough. But that's White Mike and Mod if I ever saw it.
Maybe it was first thing in the morning, on her way to the liquor store?
Are you implying Sarc sobers up by morning?
The best cure for a hangover is more alcohol.
I imagine he operates along a sliding scale.
Saw that one yesterday. Yes, she probably has as much sand in her vagina as Sarc, but not drunk enough. Still a nasty bitch though.
Breaking news! Kamala Harris calls Donald Trump a doodoo-head. Serious Democratic media figures immediately concur, and delve into the color and texture of doodoo.
Amazing and brave. Just like Charlamagne breaking the seal on calling Trump a fascist, so too has Harris gone where no one else has before.
Is KMW telling Liz which polls to highlight? It seems it is always the ones most favorable to Kamala. Why is Nate Silver not being highlighted? RCP aggregate? WSJ?
InteractivePolls
@IAPolls2022
National poll by Wall Street Journal
2-WAY
Trump: 49%
Harris: 46%
Last poll (9/28) - Harris +1
——
FULL FIELD
Trump: 47%
Harris: 45%
Last poll - Harris +2
I don't think cherry-picking the public polling and aggregators amounts to much (what you think Liz Wolfe might be doing). The aggregators pretty much all come out close to each other.
The direction of the underlying poll movement is the same; away from Team D.
The quinnepac poll is one of two most positive for Kamala on RCP.
Which poll is highlighted seems to always switch to one's most favorable. For example Silver was highlighted when Kamala took the polling lead. Now a sub comment but not a highlight.
"The direction of the underlying poll movement is the same; away from Team D."
And because of it we can expect some batshit insane stunts from the Democrats and the corporate press in the next two weeks.
Well, one very useful piece of information has emerged in the last week; namely, regardless of who wins, they will be dealing with a Team R Congress (House, Senate).
At this point, I'm more worried about shenanigans in Congressional races.
A Republican Congress with Kamamama in the White House might actually be the best outcome.
EO's will be commonplace. Congress is meaningless
The Supreme Court says you’re being short sighted.
We already are. Note the recent hit piece from The Atlantic.
They have another one today to link Trump to Epstein. Waiting for the usual band of Democrats here to post it. Already debunked.
Which is odd as,
1. It was under Trump’s DOJ that Epstein was finally arrested, and
2. Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-A-Lago for having untoward behavior towards the underage ladies there.
Lying lefties don’t care about facts that contradict their narrative.
JesseAZ, I just want to see the Venn diagram of Epstein's client list to P Diddy's Freak Off list to Kamala's top dollar donor list.
'Harris responded: "I don't think we should be making concessions when we're talking about a fundamental freedom to make decisions about your own body."'
And apparently that includes absolute control over third-party entities that may be in a woman's body at any given time. Men, you and your penises have been warned.
I don’t think we should be making concessions when we’re talking about a fundamental freedom to make decisions about your own body.
Except vaccines. We have every right to make you take experimental shots against your will.
Or sterilize you....Buck v Bell
Don't forget the draft. WW3 is just around the corner if Kamala wins.
Are we going to draft women , in the name of equity?
Only for the NBA, with mandatory contract salaries and play time minima.
Despite the best year EVR for the WNBA, they still lost $40M. The bumper year meant that the loss was not the $50M expected at the onset.
Since its inception in 1996, the WNBA has never turned a profit, and remains some 60% funded by NBA teams.
And what did the players do? They opted out of their CBA for more money.
"The WNBA this season will lose $40M, a “bit better" than the $50M “forecast and reported by several media outlets months ago but still a loss." The NBA owns nearly 60% of the league, and some NBA owners “want more transparency” from Commissioner Adam Silver about when they will “get to see some return from the suddenly popular WNBA.” A source said that when one “combines the NBA owners’ personal stakes in WNBA teams and the WNBA itself,” the amount owned rises to 75%.
"To be fair, the WNBA was projected to lose $50 million in 2024. It did $10 million better than expected — in a year that saw unprecedented viewership, attendance and popularity — and… still lost money.
And the WNBA only became "popular" because of one player. When the Fever got bounced, the playoff ratings went back into the toilet because no one outside of the press and political ideologues want to waste time watching a bunch of flat-chested lesbians play pro basketball. The league can't even beat the attendance of indoor lacrosse, which is a truly niche sport that gets NO media coverage and barely any kind of TV/streaming access.
Yeah but have you seen the Angel Reese pics in bikinis/revealing outfits?
Is the bikini bottom tight enough to show the outline of her penis?
She definitely does not have a penis.
The irony is that they could actually get more guys to watch the games if they shifted to appealing to the "male gaze" and moved away from being a Pride organization. There's some decently attractive women like Reese, Lexie Hull, Kelsey Plum, and Candace Parker that should draw male fans the way Livvy Dunne did for LSU gymnastics, but the league just assumes guys should show up because SUPPORT WOMEN AND GIRLS, and they know even most women won't watch it.
I could envision the establishment launching WW3 if Trump wins, in order to have an excuse to suspend transfer of leadership.
"Have you ever made a mistake that you learned from, asked Anderson Cooper of Vice President Kamala Harris in a CNN Town Hall"
JFC....The "What is your biggest flaw" interview question and Harris flubbed it. This was a softball that allowed Harris to explain away many of her flip-flops and she watched it go by, swatting it to the ground.
The problem with recruiting idiot puppets to manipulate, is that they're idiots.
Harris has shown that she can’t even handle softball questions; what makes anyone think she’s ready for a show like Joe Rogan’s?
Or the situation room in the White House?
She couldn’t handle a 3pm call much less a 3am call.
I hear she was quite adept at the 3am booty calls.
Rogan's pretty anodyne, to be honest. The issue with him is that he's got this "wow, man" laid-back conversational style that tends to trip up pretentious lightweights. There's absolutely no benefit to Harris going on because she'd further embarrass herself with her word salads, and she and her campaign know it. However, put Trump in Rogan's studio, and who knows what the outcome will be because Trump himself is so unpredictable on what he's going to say. Harris's "Hail Marcuse" move here is to assume that Trump on a 2-hour podcast will inevitably say something that can be turned into an ad that they'll run on loop for the next week and a half.
The only time I've really seen him get animated about anything on his show is when he's talking about bears, and when he had Sanjay Gupta on and raised his voice to him about CNN lying that he took "horse dewormer" for COVID, when he was prescribed ivermectin to treat the symptoms he had gotten from it. I specifically remember him hollering, "I can afford people medicine!"
Harris’s “Hail Marcuse” move here is to assume that Trump on a 2-hour podcast will inevitably say something that can be turned into an ad that they’ll run on loop for the next week and a half.
The problem is that Trump has already done five 2 hour podcasts this month with some pretty big names and they never got anything from those.
"The only time I’ve really seen him get animated about anything on his show is when he’s talking about bears, and when he had Sanjay Gupta on and raised his voice to him about CNN lying that he took “horse dewormer” for COVID"
And aliens. The talk between him and Tucker on aliens was pretty wild.
He’s gotten pretty caught up in Graham Hancock vs establishment archeologists.
He gets fascinated by these really esoteric topics and likes to bring on people who are outside the mainstream. That's one of the more appealing things about his show, but sometimes it can also cause you to be like, "holy shit, these guys are really out there."
a bill that would force employers in NYC to let paid sick leave be used by employees to…take their pets to the vet or "be with them during surgery."
This is outrageous! *Houseplants* are family, too!
Don't know why there isn't a normal video version of this available... https://www.youtube.com/shorts/rMX84eg0oP8
My employer provides paid sick leave, and nobody even checks or cares what it’s used for. I can use it to extend a holiday weekend if I want.
Methinks this is just another “Everything Is So Terrible And Unfair” posture from a perpetually aggrieved pandering democrat.
Good to see they’re focused on the important stuff in NYC.
I am totally not being a sexist male chauvinist pig when I say that Nancy Rommelman looks pretty damned hot in that cocktail dress. Uff-Da!
Nancy, if it doesn't work out...call me. /just teasing!!!
I love Nancy. She's been consistently one of the few good writers left at Reason.
I might even buy that book.
Let's make this a Nancy love thread and start by talking about her excellent on-the-ground journalism during the Seattle riots.
I like to remind people that repeatedly, ENB would puke out corporate media propaganda as fact in the roundup, only to be completely contradicted later the same day by Nancy’s actual, on the ground reporting. It made me happy.
Eric did an excellent job by traveling to western NC to report on how the mountain boys and gals are rolling up their sleeves to make things happen.
Yeah, that shit he published yesterday was top-tier, and right up there with Robby's UVa and Nick Sandmann articles. It was certainly leagues better than that bullshit Kevin Williamson published in The Dispatch about Springfield, Ohio, where he talked to just the mayor and the refugee coordinator, and then sallied out with his biases confirmed.
Yeah, I agree. Boehm the birdbrain evolved upward, reluctantly and strategically (for this one article).
I think that was actually Portland, but the point stands that she did some legit journalism during that period. It was certainly better than anything coming out of the mainstream media.
I think she reported on the Portland riots and the Seattle Occupy/CHAZ.
Yeah, it was both.
'ntroduced by Councilman Shaun Abreu, a Democrat representing Manhattan, this bill makes me want to jump off a cliff, mostly because pets are not the same as humans and we should stop this cultural slide toward pretending they are.'
Are they just clumps of cells?
Cruel de ville was just a misunderstood puppy abortion activist
JD Vance was wrong about Cruella being a childless dog lady.
"mostly because pets are not the same as humans and we should stop this cultural slide toward pretending they are"
I too am off-put by people calling themselves "Doggy Mommy" and "Doggy Daddy."
Shaken fur baby syndrome is junk science.
I hate that. You are not a "dog mama" you are a dog owner. You may love a pet very much, but if you are trying to have the type of relationship with it that you would have with a child you gave birth to, you have some issues.
But that's what a lot of them are doing, at least subconsciously, choosing a surrogate for children. Note how different someone with children and pets talk about their pets and people without children but have pets.
Hell, some empty nesters will even come out and tell you they got a pet basically so they still have something to care for.
Some? Its almost standard here in snowbird country.
I meant some are honest enough to admit it.
The bill makes me want to shovel a dump truck full of kittens off a cliff so that someone like Liz has a nice, fluffy landing.
We're all just clumps of cells.
'Doctors held off on publishing an important study that revealed their findings on puberty blockers because they feared how it would be used politically. "I do not want our work to be weaponized," said Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy, who runs the U.S.'s largest youth gender clinic at the Children's Hospital of Los Angeles.'
Translation for "Doctor" Olson-Kennedy: "I don't want the truth to undermine our agenda."
found that puberty blockers did not actually seem to help transgender kids' mental health. The fact that they held off on publishing the study ought to be a huge scandal; doctors should be working to do no harm, and to provide accurate information based on their clinical findings, not to service a particular political agenda.
Jeffsarcmike should be embarrassed by this. They won't be. Chase should understand his advocacy for chemical castration drugs that do have a negative effect with no positive one is bad. He won't.
If they could, they might get too testy about this.
Like masking, anyone paying attention for the past 10 years knew this already. It was well accepted for years that most kids outgrow their gender dysphoria and that transitioning was a long, arduous process that required so much commitment that individuals spend upwards of a decade getting to their first surgery.
That changed almost overnight. Basically, as soon as Gay Marriage was legalized in 2015, the advocates switched gears to Trans rights. It is really fun to watch the change in the Gender Dysphoria article on Wikipedia, as you can watch as decades of science on the subject were swiftly memory-holed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gender_dysphoria&oldid=687065611
In that article circa 2015, they said, "Some clinicians report that a significant proportion of young children diagnosed with gender identity disorder later do not exhibit the dysphoria.[40]"
By 2021 this language had been softened to say "Studies up through 2013" show this same thing. Now if you go to the Wikipedia article, you see no mention of such studies. Indeed, in the newest version, making a child comfortable with their physical sex is given the Orwellian term "Conversion Therapy", as if helping a person cope with their physical sex is the same as changing someone's sexual preference.
They have buried the 90% grow out of confusion post puberty for a decade now.
It used to be dogma that —
* Homosexuality was genetic and unchangeable. This was why gay conversion therapy was banned, even when voluntary.
* Female genital mutilation was about the worst crime possible.
* Chemical castration was immoral, even when voluntarily requested by convicted rapists and pedophiles. It was also unhealthy.
* Children by definition were not adults and not allowed to decide they wanted to smoke tobacco, drink alcohol, or imbibe other drugs.
Now it's dogma that gender is so fluid that pre-school kids must be believed when their teachers brainwash them into thinking their gender has changed, chemical castration is good AND safe when relabeled as puberty blockers, and child gender mutilation is not just good but so mandatory that parents can be charged with child abuse for trying to block it.
And somehow, when the LP candidate endorses this topsy turvy logic, I am supposed to swoon and vote for him.
Which is one reason that Trump actually has a shot at winning the popular vote this year, because a lot of libertarian leaning Republicans, who may have voted LP in the past couple decades aren't going to make that mistake again. On top of not wanting Biden or Harris back in, there's the fact that the LP basically picked the most fuck you candidate they could this cycle.
The only LP candidate I actually respected as a decent choice was Gary Johnson, first time. Sure, not a libertarian, but at least he had a proven political and executive background you could agree was better than anyone else. Second time, Weld broke that, then JoJo, and now Chase? The LP is lost to me. They aren't even serious about not being serious.
'"The Los Angeles Times' editorials editor resigned Wednesday after the newspaper's plans to endorse Vice President Kamala Harris in the presidential election were blocked by billionaire owner Patrick Soon-Shiong," reports Axios. Soon-Shiong has decided that the paper should not endorse any candidate this time around.'
SILENCE IS VIOLENCE!
Except that Mr. Soon-Shiong has something different to say.
https://x.com/drpatsoonshiong/status/1849217132183060705?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
'"For the first time, the share of eligible New Yorkers who have signed up to be organ donors has passed 50 percent," reports The New York Times. '
So that's what immigrants are for.
Worked for China and the Uyghurs
The retail cost of Soylent Green is predicted to plummet.
Tim walz attack dog?
Or Tim walz psychotic faggot Marxists
Tim Walz is more like an attack gerbil.
Yeah but the other guy is a dipshit.
You think he has the right stuff like Lemmiwinks?
You missed this one Liz.
KAMALA: "I'm pointing out things that need to be done that haven't been done that need to be done."
Kamala is unburdened by grammar, or logical sentence construction.
It probably goes without saying, but grammar is racist/raciss (Harris' pronunciation TBD based on perceived listener).
+1 Her inability to construct a sentence is racist against black people.
Except for the fact she isn’t black, but Indian.
What's next? Are you going to tell me that Barack Obama trying to shame black men into voting for her didn't work either (for some mysterious reason)?
Was that the Black Barry trying to shame the brothers, or the White Barry scolding uppity negroes?
Or sentience.
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.
It's even worse in full...
[Anderson] Cooper responded, “Some voters, though, might ask, you’ve been in the White House for four years, you were vice president, not the president. But why wasn’t any of that done over the last four years?”
Harris replied, “Well, there was a lot that was done, but there’s more to do, Anderson. And I’m pointing out things that need to be done that haven’t been done but need to be done.”
Yesterday Buttplug and Jeffsarc were pushing the Atlantic’s lie here based on an ‘anonymous source’ that Jeffrey Goldberg obviously created.
According to Goldberg’s article, upon hearing that the funeral cost $60,000, Trump said, “It doesn’t cost 60,000 bucks to bury a fucking Mexican!” and told Mark Meadows, his chief of staff at the time, “Don’t pay it!” The Guillén family is of Mexican origin.
Also yesterday, however, two of the people present came out and said it was a lie.
One was the sister of Vanessa Guillén, whose family was featured as proof in Goldberg’s piece, slammed the outlet and Goldberg for exploiting her sister’s death.
“Wow. I don’t appreciate how you are exploiting my sister’s death for politics — hurtful & disrespectful to the important changes she made for service members, President Donald Trump did nothing but show respect to my family & Vanessa. In fact, I voted for President Trump today.”
Theo Wold, yet another official who was actually in the room also publicly debunked the Atlantic’s claims yesterday.
“I was at President Trump’s meeting with the Guillén family because I assisted with translation that day.
President Trump was genuinely concerned about Vanessa Guillén and appalled by the tragedy the Guillén Family were enduring.
@mguilen_ was poised and confident in advocating for her sister then and she’s right again today: The Atlantic hit piece is a lie.
For example, President Trump had zero interest in the cameras. He met with the Guillén family privately for twenty minutes and offered the press gaggle solely if it would assist them in honoring Army Specialist Guillén and raising awareness about her case. He even told them that day that the press are vipers.
Boy was President Trump right.”
Goldberg’s smear piece is in line with his big 2020 lie, the “suckers and loser” hoax that was also heavily rebutted by nearly everyone involved, which he originated late in the election season as well. Conveniently, Democrats have since been rolling that hoax out every time Trump mentions the military, as they did again in the aftermath of Trump attending the Arlington National Cemetery ceremony.
I’ve said this before, but for a damaging story about a Democrat to be true, DNA must be found on a blue dress. It’s not enough to have a witness and a victim. It’s not enough to have a computer, a cache of validated emails, thousands of affadavits signed under the threat of perjury. There must be actual DNA, videotaped evidence. If the bad guy is a Democrat, there must be Blue Dress Proof.
For a damaging story about Trump to be true, nothing has to be true at all. Third-hand hearsay about hookers and pee, a smile on a face, or a sarcastic tweet or phrase taken out of context can make even the most absurd conclusion be portrayed as fact and conveyed as truth in perpetuity. If the bad guy is Trump, no proof is needed.
Buttplug and Jeffsarc will continue to push the lie here because that’s what the Democrats are doing, despite being debunked.
What does it say about Goldberg and The Atlantic? That is the real question, to me.
We knew Goldberg was trash ever since he fabricated quotes to justify the Iraq War back in 2002.
The Atlantic itself has always been bien pensant, but it has been an organ of the DNC ever since Kamala’s self-described best friend, Laureen Jobs bought it.
Even the Gen Kelly comment has been refuted by long time aids. Just like his sucker's and losers accusation was. Kelly is now paid to be an anti trump talking head.
Funny how Kelly didn't happen to remember it until just now. Almost suspicious.
General Kelly served this country with honor, and distinction. I think something happened inside his heart, soul and mind when his son died in battle during Trump's term. That has affected him. There is no doubt in my mind about that.
He deserves empathy and compassion, not scorn.
I think it's time we stop giving people some kind of moral cloak just because they signed up and didn't do a bunch of stupid shit while they were active duty.
Kelly's clearly acting as a political creature now, and him losing his son isn't relevant to what's motivating his actions and assertions today. No one who doesn't already think Trump is Hitler is buying this bullshit because 1) they've said it about every Republican since Truman; and 2) if Trump HAD actually said it, Kelly already would have slagged him with it on the way out the door.
On top of that, you have that tube-necked fuckhead George Conway is gaslighting Mayra Guillen that his side isn't using her sister as a political prop, and that she needs to drop her false consciousness because anything that makes Trump look bad is okay to promote. All based on this bullshit "sources say" nonsense that Jeffrey Goldberg put out.
Red, I hear you. I really do think his son's death profoundly affected him. I am explaining his actions, not making an excuse for them.
To be fair, I would think there's something wrong with him if it didn't. I just don't think it applies in this case. It seems to be driven more by the fact that Trump canned him.
Then he should learn to STFU.
“General Kelly served this country with honor, and distinction”
He was a career bureaucrat. Not some brave soldier turned battlefield commander. He is part of the reason the US military is in the state it is in.
He is a man who, by his own admission, WILLINGLY WORKED WITH A MAN WHO ADMIRED HITLER for years. Did not quit --- was, in fact, fired. And then FORGOT that the man admired Hitler for over 5 years until...well, now.
He's full of shit.
But it's not a lie if it saves democracy!
"Fake but accurate" is now the neocon catchphrase, too.
Mariel Garza, the editorials editor of the Los Angeles Times, resigned on Wednesday after the publication’s owner blocked an endorsement for Vice President Kamala Harris.
This is why you can’t have chicks in charge.
Is there an open seat on The View?
Based on tonnage alone...no.
Doctors held off on publishing an important study that revealed their findings on puberty blockers because they feared how it would be used politically.
Totally unsurprising and an excellent example of why faith in doctors and research in general is falling off. Anyone who lived through COVID knows, factually, that many doctors will place virtue signaling above a pursuit of truth.
The entire model of gender-affirming care is based on a belief system rather than evidence. It's rude to disagree with someone who has feelings about themself that don't align with reality. You should just accept everything out of politeness. It doesn't align with their sensibilities to tell children to suck it up and deal with it because life isn't meant to be easy. So they created a whole idea about how to treat gender dysphoria based on their belief system without testing to see whether it was effective, and called people bigots for disagreeing with its validity.
Then finding evidence that their treatment system is utter bullshit, they refuse to accept it because it doesn't align with their biases. They want to hide that because doing something pointless, something extremely costly, is worth the virtue signal even if it's ineffective or potentially even harmful. And these are doctors who advocate for the very thing they've found to be useless and will continue to advocate for this approach. The science is wrong because it doesn't conform their worldview. If they accept it, the Pope of their belief system will excommunicate them. The Earth doesn't revolve around the Sun, you bigot. That's blasphemy.
This is why we need to trust the WPATH advocacy groups over facts. - Jeff
"Anyone who lived through COVID knows, factually, that many doctors will place virtue signaling above a pursuit of truth."
Be fair. Those noble doctors were also saving democracy, in the last Most Important Election Year Ever.
You should just accept everything out of politeness.
The pervasive and explicit replacement of critical thinking with critical theorizing and the refusal to struggle with being harmless vs. doing good.
Well before 2019, it was (or should have been) understood that a good portion of medicine was in the realm of courtesy, virtue signalling, and projection.
All I really want is for people who are members of a religion to realize it. If you have a belief that exists before evidence, and persists after finding evidence to the contrary, that’s religious thinking. Organized religions in the modern world seem capable of accepting this disparity, but people who engage in religious thinking without the structure of a religion are incapable of examining their beliefs.
If you have a belief that exists before evidence, and persists after finding evidence to the contrary, that’s religious thinking.
What about people who believe something without evidence, go searching for evidence, fail to find any evidence, yet still hold the belief?
Asking for “a friend”, Sarc?
> What about people who believe something without evidence, go searching for evidence, fail to find any evidence, yet still hold the belief?
A lack of evidence is not, necessarily, evidence of lack. A fruitless search for evidence is, simply a fruitless search. It is not intrinsically evidence of, well, anything except, maybe, searching in the wrong manner and/or location.
Well said. Organized religion always comes down to a matter of faith in a deity or deities. Any illogic can be accepted because mere mortals cannot possibly comprehend the wisdom of the higher being. Without God religion is inevitably incoherent.
As a religious person, I agree. Faith is for what we cannot see or explain.
Their entire theological paradigm is based on a principle of pathological altruism, which is one of the core weaknesses of liberalism since the Enlightenment.
That, and the elitist assumption that superiority justifies control.
"You should just accept everything out of politeness."
But if someone decides they are trans-racial and wants to be (pretend to be) black, oh hell no!
I kinda suspect they would not care about "politicization" if it reported what they wanted it to report.
Kamala Harris explains how Trump was going to be Hitler his first term, but he forgot.
Kamala Harris: "Trump would invoke Adolf Hitler, the man who is responsible for the death of six million Jews."
Two assassination attempts, and it appears Kamala is attempting to generate a third attempt with her rhetoric. She's going all in, the Hitler Card is their desperation play. They have nothing left.
Well, that and how she was going to fix things in her first term but forgot she was already VP.
She is brain dead.
Speaking of brain dead, sarcasmic was repeating this stuff just the other day. I think I have some quotes somewhere.
He has been repeating it, along with Jeff, for over a year while claiming he isn't. It is amazing.
Critical drinking skills on display.
What does she mean by "invoke?" Is he going to summon Adolf Hitler back from the dead? Is he going to channel the spirit of Adolf through himself to carry out Adolf's design?
Hitler is Trump's stand. Kamala is also a stand user, so she can see it.
That's a Bizarre reference.
Adventurous
The progressives "trump is bad just like Hitler"
Also progressives "gas the jews"
You know else liked October surprises?
The 1968 Detroit Tigers?
this morning on MLB Network Jayson Stark put Denny McClain v. Bob Gibson up as one of the four big-time Star-v-Star World Series matchups
Vladimir Lenin?
The Great Pumpkin?
Admiral Mikawa?
Though in his case it was August, September, October and November surprises that stop being surprising.
An assassination is looking more and more like her only hope.
Thinking of that, I have a serious question:
What happens if the president-elect is assassinated after the election, but prior to inauguration? He wouldn’t yet be president, but his opponent would have been defeated in the election. Would it fall to the vice president-elect?
I don't think there's established rules on that, but if Trump did get yeeted after winning the election but before the inauguration, the assumption would be that Vance would be next in line and a VP for him would have to be chosen before the election certification by the House. Barring that, the Dems would probably demand to have another election after Vance picks a VP, although I can't imagine such a thing would go over well after they'd spent the past year trying to get Trump killed by some nutbag.
I asked a similar question the other day but here's another one. I early voted Trump/Vance yesterday. If Trump is assassinated prior to the election but the R ticket wins does Vance somehow win the presidency even though nobody voted for him for that office? Would the line of succession apply prior to or at the inauguration? Would Mike Johnson become Vice President? All shit we shouldn't have to worry about but a successful assassination is a real possibility.
After Congressional certification and before inauguration day, the 20th amendment would kick in. It provides that “if, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the president, the president elect shall have died, the vice president elect shall become president.”
But after Election Day and before certification? "It is an open legal question whether a candidate becomes the president-elect after winning a majority of the vote in the Electoral College or only after Congress counts the vote."
https://ballotpedia.org/What_happens_if_the_winning_presidential_candidate_becomes_incapacitated_before_taking_office%3F_(2020)
If they don't get him before the election, and he blasts past their fraud factor, they're going to get him before January.
Too many top men have done way too many criminal things since 2016 to ever let an uncorrupt DoJ come in.
That's what I've been saying here. Trump is not going to be allowed to be President again. It doesn't matter if he's elected.
Did Trump respect his father and love his mother? HITLER!
"I respected my father, but I loved my mother." Adolph Hitler
https://babylonbee.com/news/9-ways-trump-is-exactly-like-hitler
Mein Kampf is German for The Art Of The Deal: Some people may try to tell you that's not the correct translation, but that's just revisionist history.
Both were called Hitler by their political opponents: Obviously not a coincidence.
If you rearrange the letters in "Trump" (while eliminating the U, M, and P and adding H, I, L, and E) it spells "Hitler": Things like this don't just happen by chance.
Both briefly worked at McDonald's: Hitler reportedly loved serving up nein-piece Chicken McNuggets.
They have the exact same mustache but Trump's is blonde so you can't see it: Trust us.
WW2 and January 6th were basically the same: If you don't believe J6 was that bad, you can subscribe to The Babylon Bee and watch a documentary that will prove it.
Hitler was a painter and Trump one time did pottery in a commercial: This is no accident.
Both had cameos in major films: Trump in Home Alone 2, Hitler in Blitzkrieg Of Poland, which are essentially the same.
Hitler also got two scoops of ice cream when journalists only got one: The true mark of a genocidal fascist.
^ golf clap
If Poland had had Kevin, they might have repelled Hitler.
“They have the exact same mustache but Trump’s is blonde so you can’t see it: Trust us.”
My anonymous source has confirmed he overheard this on the subway.
They both liked dogs. Hitler had a GSD named Blondi and Trump fucked Stormy Daniels.
Fucking Stormy is one of my biggest criticisms of Trump. So many better looking porn stars.
Sasha Grey?
She’d work.
Democrats on abortion:
Democrats on slavery:
Democrats on Indian Removal:
They never change.
They've been evil since they spawned.
Meet the New York Times source who claims Kamala Harris’s late mother told her that her daughter worked at McDonald's. Turns out she’s a Harris Campaign surrogate who’s visited the White House.
I’m sure she could have made a phone call to the social security offices and had proof of employment within 10 minutes if she actually worked at McDonald’s.
She even says her and Kamala never really talked to each other about working at mcdonalds.
Maybe she’s misremembering and it was actually McDowell’s.
they got the golden arches, we got the golden arch.
"I'm McDowell's. They got the Golden Arches, mine is the Golden Arcs. They got the Big Mac, I got the Big Mick. We both got two all-beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles and onions, but their buns have sesame seeds."
Oops. Lost right into their private accounts.
World Bank bureaucrats lost track of at least $24B in funds fighting climate change: ‘Could be twice or 10 times more’
No wonder it’s so hot outside!
Buttigiegian
The distance one must be up one's own ass in order to use this word in support of the party can only be feasibly measured in light years.
"Not in a wonky way" would have been enough. dayenu.
"The candidates are statistically tied among likely voters in each of the seven swing states in the Bloomberg News/Morning Consult poll,..."
Gee, why not the NYT?
No innovations from Singapore? What about the Singapore Sling?
SMDH.
"this answer is bad for two reasons"
And more. It's 100% designed to satisfy the anti-Catholic fervor in Democrats, who seemingly want to force Catholic charity hospitals to perform abortions or go out of business. It's near the top of their list...can't have someone using their religion to choose to not perform abortions, they must be FORCED to do them no matter what. It's not enough that Planned Parenthood be able to operate an abortion clinic on every corner, if some Catholics want to fund a hospital they must OBEY the government and perform abortions too.
Catholic charity hospitals already have one foot in the closure box. One of the largest in NYC, St. Vincents, closed years ago due to lack of funds.
Communities needs these hospitals. Harris would be hurting the very people she claims to support.
https://www.nyclgbtsites.org/site/st-vincents-hospital-manhattan/
In my small town/city the only real hospital (and the largest in the region) is a Catholic institution. And the local purple hairs are constantly whining about not just abortion but also a lack of sterilization services. Of course, they also whine about a lack of maternity services across the region.
an abortion clinic on every corner
Planned Parenthood needs to team up with Dollar General.
I think Dollar General carries coat hangers. Just sayin.
now she's been making the rounds: The View, Telemundo, a Fox News interview, the Gen Z podcast Call Her Daddy, Charlamagne tha God.
Seriously?
Staged, preset questions, 100% friendly confines, rigged audiences. Hardly seems like "making the rounds".
“Are we going to be able to ask a question?” a woman attending the Oakland County event asked Shriver ahead of Harris taking the stage with former Congresswoman Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), according to the Daily Mail.
“You’re not, unfortunately we have some predetermined questions,” Shriver told the audience, sparking an immediate buzz. The event, held in Royal Oak, Michigan, alongside former Congresswoman Liz Cheney, quickly raised eyebrows as the atmosphere of open discussion was replaced with carefully managed queries.
It's rather remarkable how the media has bent over backwards to set this dizzy bimbo up for success, and she still can't come off looking like she knows what the fuck she's doing.
It's the equivalent of someone making a birdhouse for their kid, telling the kid, "Okay, all you have to do is nail the roof to the top of the house and you're done," and the dumbshit puts the damn thing on crooked while smacking their own hand twice in the process.
Yellow (pink?) journalism is back, baby!
Bom Dia
African migrants in Lisbon, Portugal, are rioting after a local African criminal was shot dead by Portuguese cops after he attacked them first with a bladed weapon.
The riots began in Zambujal, the African ghetto of Lisbon and were mostly contained in that part of the city.
- Resistencia Lusitania
Resisting the Great Replacement, I mean Demographics is Destiny, is racist!
Actual emergency preparedness, #3...
https://www.fema.gov/about/strategic-plan
FEMA Goals and Objectives:
Goal 1: Instill equity as a foundation of emergency management
Goal 2: Lead whole of community in climate resilience
Goal 3: Promote and sustain a ready FEMA and prepared nation
Lead whole of community in climate resilience
WTF is that supposed to mean?
Did you flunk your Post-modernist Thought course?
If the 'w' his a typo I think it's a post-modern interpretation of "shoot the climate community in the head or sever the spinal column".
China...
I wouldn’t call the PRC either open or innovative.
The economy in China is. That was the statement... an open an innovative economy. That's why Apple builds its phones there.
I would say it’s dynamic rather than innovative. They don’t really create anything new, but they do make a lot of things and copy them from elsewhere.
Yeah, look, all I’m saying is that China (and Singapore, I guess, because I’m not super-knowledgeable about Singapore’s political structure) has kind of put the lie to the fact that if you introduce free-market policies, general liberty will follow.
And just for the record, I work for a company that manufactures in China and I’ve spent time working there. I can tell you that for China to build and maintain the infrastructure, know-how and engineering talent to build and maintain the manufacturing and business environment it has requires quite a bit of innovation. Yes, there is tons of IP theft in China. Yes, the average Chinese person in business has different priorities and looks at the world differently than we do in the west (big subject). But trust me, the Chinese are very smart people who can produce incredibly innovative processes to solve vexing problems.
I see it more as economic freedom being necessary, but not sufficient, to produce general liberty. And culture and history matter too. There's no way a Singapore-like authoritarian government would work out well in the US, and probably most of the west.
“And culture and history matter too.”
Look at Zeb going all racist.
I see it more as economic freedom being necessary, but not sufficient, to produce general liberty.
I agree with this. Culture matters. The Islamic world is not teetering on the edge of becoming a trans-flag waving liberal democracy if we can just send them a few episodes of My Two Dads.
Just an aside, since you mentioned My Two Dads, Staci Keanan is now a DA on Los Angeles county, I didn’t know that.
Read a book a few years back, name and author unknown, who argued that maritime nations (Netherlands, Britain, US) developed an independent free-thinking society, especially in the age of sail, whereas territorial nations (Germany, Russia, China) developed rigid hierarchies to control and coordinate their armies. France was the major in-between example, yet the minute their army was called upon to repel invasion, they beached their ships and turned their cannon and sailors into army soldiers.
Seems to me like a decent theory, although hard to prove. Hard to guess how much it still applies with steam ships and telegraph and radio communications. But it does provide an interesting way of comparing societies.
China dominated the Eastern Pacific and Indian Ocean with a giant fleet in the early 1400s, then abruptly abandoned it. It’s debated why, but two given explanations are the conservative Confucionists took over and wanted the country to focus inward, and that increased attacks by the Mongols and other groups required them to increase their focus and resources on land defense.
Maritime powers generally required a large, specialized, workforce and that requires a strong, economic base to support. Additionally, unlike an Army (at the time, early modern period) a Navy once built, generally required more upkeep, even during peace times, than an Army, which was much easier to downsize. Even ships in regular require upkeep, and armed merchantmen just could not stand up to true warships, so some crew had to be kept around to perform regular maintenance. Additionally, maritime nations had overseas colonies that required a guarantee of navigation, which required a large number of war ships (especially brig, sloops and frigate size) left in service. This all required a greater investment than peace time Armies, requiring a stronger economic base than land based powers. This required a far freer economic system in order to create the surplus necessary to fund a standing Navy, which in turn helped contribute to the workers demanding more personal liberty. Additionally, add in the fact that the Netherlands and Britain are northern Germanic states, as opposed to southern Germanic states, and protestant to boot, there was also a tradition of greater individual freedoms to build upon. Hell, one of the things the Normans (descendants of the Vikings only superficially latinized) worked hard to eliminate after 1066 was slavery in England.
It was never officially banned (not until the 19th century) but the Normans worked to make it socially unacceptable. And mostly succeeded.
" notes Bloomberg. Fewer swing-staters say that they've noticed price increases over the past month compared with how many noticed price increases when asked a year ago.
This confuses me. "A Chicken & Gyoza now costs $50 at my local hole-in-the-wall"
"Yeah, but has it gone up since yesterday?"
"Well... no..."
"Ok, then inflation is under control"
Inflation is ok if you no longer notice it.
I've no idea how much some things have gone up, since I stopped buying and doing those things. Fast food? No idea, almost never eat it (living in BFE, there's no fast food places within 25 miles or so). Plane tickets? Haven't flown in years. Movie theater? Stopped going once an 80-inch TV was put up in the house.
Now, we can talk about the price of chicken feed, tractor diesel, and fence parts...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/23/science/puberty-blockers-olson-kennedy.html U.S. Study on Puberty Blockers Goes Unpublished Because of Politics, Doctor Says
The leader of the long-running study said that the drugs did not improve mental health in children with gender distress and that the finding might be weaponized by opponents of the care.
Trust the Science... Butt shit is SECRET twat The Science has found!!!
This shit is old...
http://reason.com/blog/2017/10/03/brickbat-dont-ask-dont-tell
I am utterly SHOCKED to learn that NOT offending the “tranny brigade” of PC people is WAY more important than the actual happiness of trannies and potential trannies!!! Or even STUDYING such matters!
Speaking of such things, there are biochemical, often off-label, solutions to your urges towards becoming a tranny, which MIGHT actually lead to better results! To MORE happiness, for many potential trannies! To becoming happy with your body, as it already is! Imagine that!
See http://www.drugs.com/condition/gender-dysphoria.html for “Off Label” uses of drugs for suppressing “gender dysphoria”… 6 drugs listed in web link above, to include (pretty obviously) testosterone…
Also see “The successful treatment of a gender dysphoric patient with Pimozide” at http://www.researchgate.net/publication/14365362_The_successful_treatment_of_a_genderdysphoric_patient_with_Pimozide
(I hope that the PC police won’t be bashing my door down soon, for my sins, in reporting this.)
Also use below as search-string…
“Transgender woman, who claims pills for male hair-loss sparked gender change, opens up”
Concerns male-hair-loss “…drug (Whose Name May Not Be Mentioned), called (Whose Name May Not Be Mentioned), to halt the onset of hereditary baldness”, which feminized his / her body, and brought around the desire for a sex change, according to him-now-her.
So then drug (Whose Name May Not Be Mentioned) sounds like a darned-good choice for an off-label drug use, if you are female, contemplating sex-change to male, and worrying that your marriage might not survive such a sex change… Which is a strong possibility! Try this first, to see if maybe you’d like to stay female, before you make drastic changes…
I am severely disappointed in Reason.com, in that they (supposedly “pro-free-speech” ones that they are) have repeatedly disallowed my posts mentioning precisely WHICH drug (by name) might be used for off-label uses! Hey Reason! People DESPERATELY needing pain relief just MIGHT use street heroin for pain relief, OFF LABEL, instead of committing severe-pain-induced suicide! Shall we prohibit mentioning “heroin”?
Here, I'll give you a reply to let you feel like you're accomplishing something.
I don't think we should be making concessions when we're talking about a fundamental freedom to make decisions about your own body."
The level of cognitive dissonance needed to believe forcing a group of healthcare providers to do something is not a violation of their "fundamental freedom" is genuinely breathtaking. And that doesn't even address all the other fundamental freedoms Harris and progressives are pathologically opposed to:
Selling your labor at any rate you see fit.
Selling your organs as you see fit.
Selling sexual services as you see fit.
Consuming intoxicants as you see fit.
Doing with your property as you see fit...
And of course, even if you're ignoring the fetus' place in the equation, Democrats are still about FORCING medical providers to violate their own fundamental human rights to follow their own religious beliefs. Democrats are not content that abortion is allowed--oh, no--abortion MUST be provided and cannot be refused by any medical practitioner for any reason, by force if need be (or in some cases, preferably).
The FDA would like a word about your freedom to make decisions about your own body...
Dave Smith vs Binion, I’m here for it:
“Unserious? Billy I will run circles around you on any topic and you and everyone at Reason knows this. That’s why I’m lapping you in this game. Sit the fuck down.”
https://x.com/ComicDaveSmith/status/1849432688232402970
I went over... very carefully my 'isidewith' answers where I got 88% Chase Oliver an 80% DT, with Harris down at 36%. And yet another flock of Reason writers picked Harris as the strategic and reluctant libertarian-ish vote.
I say again, there is no way in any reasonable world that Harris is "the best substitute" for a libertarian vote that you're not enthused about from the party...
Hell, even Chemjeff claimed he got Trump @57% and Harris @45%. And that guy's a Democrat, cosplaying as a Democrat and using Libertarian pronouns.
I mean, Jesus, look a this from Binion:
A reminder that these are the same folks who’ll lecture you about how you’re not a ~real libertarian~ while they advocate for a guy who pushes tariffs, spends like a drunken sailor, wants to execute people for drug crimes & gives handouts to his fav special interests. Unserious.
Let’s go through these one at a time:
A guy who pushes Tariffs. Ok, are Democrats against Tariffs? Ronald Reagan was for Tariffs and his name is invoked often as a glowing example of a “good non-Trumpy” era of Republicanism.
Spends like a Drunken Sailor. Compared to… what? Democrats will PROUDLY declare they’re tax and spend liberals. That’s a central party position! This is bowf sidezism at it’s worst. Democrats want to spend $900,000,000 Trillion! Trump spent $4 trillion! Bowf Sidez!
“wants to execute people for drug crimes” Yeah, that’s bad rhetoric. But it’s Donald Trump essentially bloviating on the death penalty, which he supports. So does Harris. Harris is a death penalty supporter. Isidewith: Do you support the death penalty: Harris/Trump: Yes
” & gives handouts to his fav special interests.”. What in the fuck politics are you watching, asshole? You really can’t be this retarded… even with that fucking hat you can’t be this retarded.
if you can pick Binion apart in two minutes ...
Well, Binion is retarded.
popping his head up at Dave Smith would seem to verify this.
Yeah but that hair. Sooo Dreamy.
Summary: they both like tariffs, one wants to cut taxes and spend while the other wants to raise taxes and spend, both want to execute people for victimless crimes, and both subsidize politically connected companies. Yet one is so much better than the other.
And Chase is gay, so now what?
Wait. What?!?!? I was going to vote for him due to his extensive libertarian track record both in the private sector and as an elected official. But now I’m not so sure. Has this been confirmed?
According to sarc, he is totally gay, and that’s the only reason people won’t vote for him.
Doesn’t Jeffy need white knighting somewhere?
Think he needs White Castle more.
He can be, and he is.
I didn't have Chase in my list Kamala was in there, but not Chase but with parties it came out libertarian as #1 with constitutional as #2 with apologies to the group and no knowledge of this candidate Peter Sonski, Trump, and Kennedy as matching choices.
+1 Trump, Sonski, RFK Jr.
Kammy is/was at 4-8%. Oliver is nowhere to be found.
Essentially, unless you're 100% in the "We need to subsidize transitioning children and abortive mothers." camp, there's no clear Reason to support Chase over others.
Whether the LP did it knowingly or accidentally, that's the way they chose to define/represent themselves. What used to be a party of hip, edgy, but principled Republicans has turned into a party of circus freaks so weird even the Democrats have started to say "Boys, Boys, you're scaring the straights, OK? Is there any way we can do this tomorrow?"
"...The fact that they held off on publishing the study ought to be a huge scandal; doctors should be working to do no harm, and to provide accurate information based on their clinical findings, not to service a particular political agenda..."
There's a certain asshole with the initials of F-a-u-c-i who disagrees.
>>statistically tied among likely voters in each of the seven swing states in the Bloomberg News/Morning Consult poll
can you guys even spell Rasmussen?
>>"I don't think we should be making concessions when we're talking about a fundamental freedom to make decisions about your own body."
I would have proposed this when registering for the draft but in the '80s identifying as a girl didn't carry the water it does today.
Since women still aren't required to register for the draft, how about a woman who identifies as a man? Or for that sake, a man who identifies as woman? How does selective service address this? Tells you a lot about how much they cherish their so called principles.
I think they were floating chicks in the draft last year to counter the obvious ludicrousness you pointed out
I think, like a lot of things, they’re just for equality when it’s convenient and beneficial, but when it becomes inconvenient or distasteful, then they pretend like you’re a monster for proposing it. As an side, to graduate 19K school, a male recruit must be able to clear the breach, grab the next round* out of storage and load the 120 mm cannon in under 4 seconds, a female needs to do it in under 6 seconds. That’s the difference of 15 shots/minute and ten shots/minute, which is really the difference between life and death. Okay, here’s an idea, sure females can serve in combat arms but have to meet the same standards as men, because it’s other people’s life on the line.
*Average weight of the 120 mm round is around 75 pounds, about 40% of the body weight of the average male recruit, and closer to 60-75% of the average female recruit. Of course the next version of the Abrams may have an autoloading system but the US Army has been reluctant** to adopt autoloading systems due to unreliability issues. It would shrink crew size from 4 to 3, but if it breaks down in combat.
** Similar to how the US Army has been reluctant to adopt a bullpup configuration for its main rifles.
>>sure females can serve in combat arms but have to meet the same standards as men
^^ the answer I clicked in the stupid poll although I'm not military so any opinion is clearly theory,
It's just logical because the combat arms tend to be extremely physical and lack of being able to meet the physical standards puts other people's lives at risk. Want to be an 11C (infantry mortar team, mortars are all infantry) but can't hump the baseplate at a route step or run distances carrying it? You think the battle is going to stop to accommodate your equity? Can't load a 155 mm shell or a 120 mm shell or a 105 mm shell as fast as a man? How many men are going to die to accommodate your equity.
Well, women bring other things besides physical strength. Doesn't matter when I need mortar fire now, what other gifts you have, what I care about is you and your team getting the mortar in place fast and correctly so they can lay down the fire I need.
At least a biological woman can be maintained in the field without daily drug therapy.
Even if they cannot load a shell or change a tread without male assistance.
What is the plan for a trans tank crewmember/artillerist/mortar team member who needs daily hormone therapy?
Obama and Miley have hollowed out our military.
Biden has given away all our ammunition reserves.
Our generals should be ashamed of themselves
You can't make concessions with someone who is trying to enslave you.
Who is this?
Uncle Leo?
>>I've been searching far and wide for what Harris' pitch to voters is as early voting starts and election day nears.
queue Chicago VII ... also, why?
Another day…
“HOLY MACKEREL the gov knew abt TdA in Aurora as early as Sept 2023 and chose to neither inform us or do anything to remove these dangerous ppl
All our local politicians and bureaucrats deserve to be fired”
https://x.com/dnvr_is_burning/status/1849219457152946248
Well, yeah, that's when all the Venezuelans were being sent to sancturary in the Mile High Shitty by Abbott.
>>Have you ever made a mistake that you learned from, asked Anderson Cooper of Vice President Kamala Harris in a CNN Town Hall.
asking a question the answer of which you know will destroy the subject of the question is a devious and delicious tactic.
>>Doctors held off on publishing an important study that revealed their findings on puberty blockers because they feared how it would be used politically.
no no ... doctors used politically an important study revealing their findings on puberty blockers because they feared the truth.
>>The fact that they held off on publishing the study ought to be a huge scandal
totally your job to make it so. interested to see how much you care.
>>Soon-Shiong has decided that the paper should not endorse any candidate this time around.
wielding political influence is one reason to purchase a major media outlet.
Looks like Trump might go on Joe Rogan's podcast. Predictably, people are already mad: "Trump Cancels All His Events in Favor of One of the Worst People Ever" https://newrepublic.com/post/187405/donald-trump-cancels-events-joe-rogan
I’ll definitely give it a listen.
I did that stupid poll & it came up 85% T / 81% Oliver / 51% RFK lol / 19% KH so now I don't know whether I'm gay or should work at McDonalds
If you are gay, sarc says McDonald’s won’t hire you.
Don’t ask; don’t fry.
I shall serve no fries before their time.
90% T, 61% Sonski, 43% RFK Jr., 10% West..., 8% KH
hilarious link. I had Sonski in the 40%s but idk who he is lol
American Solidarity Party.
For the record, mine was 89% T, 62% Sonski, 60% RFK; and the parties were:
Constitution: 91%
Republican: 86%
Libertarian: 78%
The Democrats came in dead last at 4%
I honestly don't know how some people here didn't align with Oliver at all. Again, I'm 88% Oliver, 80% Trump. While I won't go through every answer (because I answered all the questions, expanding out every category-- test took me like 40 minutes) I answered "yes" to anything that shrank the government or lowered taxes, more immigration restrictions, no amnesty for illegals, hard... HARD no on all the DEI/Culture war shit, hard, HARD no on all the tranny shit. The only thing I can think of where I would have aligned only with Oliver was drug legalization stuff. Despite my experiences (and regular complaining) about living in David Simon's masturbatory fantasy of drug decriminalization-- I'm still all in on ending the drug war... I just think that if a meth addict (who knows what's in his drugs) attacks someone or smashes the 7-11 storefront windows for the 9th time this month, that they/them should be arrested and put in fucking jail, and forced into rehab. If you're high on Krokodil and you carjack someone, you should go to jail.
Other than that, I was death penalty yes, abortion yes (ban after first trimester), shut down the border, shrink the government, stop restricting my 2nd amendment rights, quit interfering with the screening and blocking of offensive material, no welfare/healthcare in perpetuity for illegal immigrants. Seemed pretty Trumpy to me.
>>I was death penalty yes, abortion yes (ban after first trimester)
I'm a hard no on both so maybe where we flipped the T/O percentages?
"Buy my book!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDTwO0TlwOU
rather I buy lunch & Nancy reads it to me
I'm afraid you'll have to print out the photo poster size and prop it up across from you at the restaurant. Have your Kindle read the book to you in a sexy voice.
oh not for the sex I just thought she could use a meal.
Seems like a too thin skank swigging wine...avoid at all costs..get a chick with some meat on the bones..
They could name this appliance Pluggo because it sucks and hurls racial slurs:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-10-11/robot-vacuum-yells-racial-slurs-at-family-after-being-hacked/104445408
Daniel Swenson standing in the room where his robot vacuum was hacked. (Supplied)
I'm not sure what to think about captions like that...
"So this is where it happened?"
"Yeah"
"Can I get a picture?"
"I... guess."
"...organ donation on the rise..."
Really?
What about piano, trombone and clarinet donations?
Are they on the rise too?
The panting of the reason crowd for BJ Harris is pathetic. Her husband knocked up the nanny, she got into law school pretending to be a disadvantaged black (can we see her SAT or LSAT scores?), rode the CA diversity ladder up (and let old Willie bang the shit out of her), never had children, has no I repeat no discernable accomplishments or critical thinking skills and yet the Reason folks want her to win so bad. Why? Abortion..open borders and sexually mutilating kids. JC..you all live in DC or NYC or LA and are about the most disgusting folks..the pic above with another Reason "liberal" swigging wine and looking like she needs a Big Mac is not surprising. The only catholic you seem to have was a dude who honestly believes you can be the other gender and mutilated himself..Reason what the hell happened to you?