A D.C. Cocktail Bar Takes on Taboos
"The more you tell people they can't have something, the more they want it."

One of Washington, D.C.'s best cocktail bars is Silver Lyan, the only U.S. outpost for award-winning British bar maestro Ryan "Mr Lyan" Chetiyawardana's cocktail empire. The bar, which is located inside a subterranean vault in a bank that has been converted into a chic downtown hotel, is renowned for its elaborate techniques, its cleverly referential cocktails—one recent drink was designed to mimic a half-smoke, Washington, D.C.'s signature chili dog—and its themed menus.
Over the summer, the bar unveiled its newest menu, devoted to exploring taboos. On this menu, there are drinks devoted to cannibalism, nipples, unspeakable words, and outlawed substances.
For example, there's the Banned in Boston, which consists of Patrón reposado tequila, pawpaw amazake, cornflake Froyo, white cacao absinthe, and silver pepper mix. Even if you aren't familiar with most of the ingredients, all you need to know is they're all part of a high-concept story in a glass.
The drink was inspired by the so-called forbidden fruit effect. As a post on the bar's Instagram feed explained, "Multiple psych studies have shown that limiting access to something only makes it more desirable—the more you tell people they can't have something, the more they want it—and the allure of the unattainable has been exploited by canny marketers for centuries." And thus, multiple ingredients in the cocktail are derived from substances that have either been banned or have been associated with the Garden of Eden, where Eve was tempted to eat a fruit from a particular tree after being told not to.
Pawpaws, for example, are Missouri's official state fruit, and Missouri is where members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints believe the Garden of Eden existed. The pawpaws in the drink come from a farm in Ohio, however, and are combined with mango, banana, koji rice, and vodka. And that's just one part of the drink.
The cornflake Froyo, meanwhile, is a nod to John Harvey Kellogg, a Progressive leader in the late 1800s and early 1900s who advocated abstinence from sex, insisting it provided health benefits. For the drink, cornflakes and whole milk are combined into cereal milk, then added to Greek yogurt, which is then garnished with peppercorns.
If this sounds exhaustingly elaborate, have no fear; the drink itself is creamy and chilled and layered with delicious, unexpected flavors. It's so unusual, and so good, that it's not too hard to imagine the drink being, well, banned in Boston, a mid–20th century phrase that achieved meme status referencing the New England city's historical propensity to ban books, music, movies, and other artistic works with supposedly objectionable content.
The good news? The Banned in Boston is available for drinking in Washington, D.C.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "The Cocktail of Forbidden Fruit."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The more you tell people they can't have something, the more they want it.
This is lost on MSM and their messaging about DJT.
cleverly referential cocktails
I can’t wait for this remnant of hipster culture to die.
Pawpaws, for example, are Missouri’s official state fruit, and Missouri is where members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints believe the Garden of Eden existed. The pawpaws in the drink come from a farm in Ohio
It’s like a terrible game of Six-Degrees of I don’t give a shit.
It literally sounds like they made a drink and then just retconned the story. Is that part of the schtick? Am I trampling on some sort of kayfabe? Because otherwise it seems like a lame excuse to pay too much money for a drink by people obsessed with making things that aren’t things into things. Like a stereotypical hyper-conservative couple from the 50s (or earlier) who’s been married for 40 yrs. and whose idea of ‘living dangerously’ is mixed drinks with exotic fruit flavors.
Sounds 'edgy', like telling Trump jokes on late-night TV.
Ah, the D.C. cocktail scene.
Could you play into the Reason writer stereotype harder?
Stoned ass-sex with a Mexican behind a food truck?
What do you think he's doing after consuming a $45 drink?
My god, the most reason-esque article of time, right before my eyes. The cocktail parties accusations are correct.
Damn. Even Reason is trolling Reason .
That's right, lean into it
Lol
$19. Could be worse.
https://www.silverlyan.com/
So . . . the Banned in Boston not only isn't banned in Boston, but it contains nothing that was ever banned in Boston - or anythign even related to Boston.
Instead it has a bunch of unrelated ingredients that don't even have a consistent theme?
Right. To the point that it almost seems like the weird FinDom fetish where people pay hookers too much money just to lie to them and treat them badly. Those of us "outside the community" just don't appreciate it.
I would much rather eat chili dogs than drink chili dog- flavored cocktails. What the Hell are they even putting in there? Cocktail onions, mustard, chili powder, cumin, allspice, garlic and cloves?
Multiple psych studies have shown that limiting access to something only makes it more desirable—the more you tell people they can't have something, the more they want it
Yea, it's a real problem with criminals (and especially sex offenders, especially in these days of the rainbow alphabet people and pornography on demand). That's why we have jails. Because it's not always a good idea for people to have whatever they want.
This is the very first lesson mankind never learned. Which makes the following line so apropos:
And thus, multiple ingredients in the cocktail are derived from substances that have either been banned or have been associated with the Garden of Eden, where Eve was tempted to eat a fruit from a particular tree after being told not to.
Kinda missed the point of that then, didn't they.
Or they're sneering at it.
Like I said - very first lesson we refused to learn.
And the second lesson we refused to learn is that other people will do things that you don't like and there's little you can do about it.
No, the second lesson was about envy, pride, and murder.
I don’t get it. The very first part of that was that there are some forbidden desires that I right to resist or forbid.
Do you not acknowledge that?
Is there also no point to acknowledging that being a slave to your own desires is also not freedom?
Same block as the original 9:30 Club.
Banned in DC > Banned in Boston.
Well lah di fricking dah. How archly ironic it all is. Do I need to show my INDIE magazine subscription to get in the door?
What a horrible way to treat perfectly good booze!
If you feel the need to disguise your alcohol with a bunch of adulterants, you're drinking the wrong stuff. A good single-malt scotch needs no additives.
Note to self: avoid the Silver Lyan. Sounds insufferable. And expensive.
The Banned in Boston is but the watery and preterite shadow of the Consistory of Geneva, a Himbeergeist & high-cyanide Willamine flaming cocktail on offer only to the Calvinist Elect in the gnome bars of Zug.