Americans Grow Increasingly Dependent on Government Payments
Many citizens of the land of the free are hooked on government checks.

An old saying has it that he who takes the king's coin becomes the king's man. The idea is that rulers expect obedience in return for money disbursed. That has important implications in a country founded on the ideal of independence from intrusive government but whose citizens are increasingly dependent on the public teat. With taxes collected from some repurposed as transfer payments to other members of the public, a growing share of Americans are becoming the king's men.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
Soaring Dependency in Recent Decades
"Income from government transfers is the fastest-growing major component of Americans' personal income," according to a September report from the bipartisan Economic Innovation Group (EIG). "Nationally, Americans received $3.8 trillion in government transfers in 2022, accounting for 18 percent of all personal income in the United States. That share has more than doubled since 1970."
As of 1970, the report's authors found, people in less than 1 percent of counties in the United States received a quarter or more of personal incomes from transfers. "These were the country's most economically distressed corners." That number rose to 5 percent by 1990, 10 percent in 2000, and then soared. In 2022, a majority of counties—53 percent—received a quarter or more of personal incomes from transfers. Nine percent of counties received less than 15 percent of income from transfers in 2022—down from 86 percent in 1970.
The significant rise in the share of personal income represented by government payments occurred because they are no longer targeted at just the "most economically distressed." The biggest growth in transfer payments comes in the form of entitlement programs linked to old age and retirement.
An Older Population Fuels Reliance on Government
"Aging is an especially important driver of the accelerated growth of the transfer share since the Great Recession," note report authors Kenan Fikri, Sarah Eckhardt, and Benjamin Glasner. "In percentage point terms, the 65 and over share of the population rose as much in the 10 years from 2010 to 2020 as it did in the 50 years from 1960 to 2010." Whereas 9.8 percent of the population was 65 and over in 1970, seniors made up 17.3 percent of the population as of 2022.
As a result, the largest category of transfer payments is Social Security, followed by Medicare. But economic downturns continue to fuel growth in government payments, subject to a ratchet effect that sees expenditures rise but never fully roll back.
"Total transfer income has emerged permanently higher from each recession since at least the 1970s," note the authors. "The resulting stair-step pattern suggests that each downturn leaves a legacy of expanded safety net programs and participation in its wake."
Medicaid, which provides healthcare for those with limited resources, is the third-largest category. It's driven by expansion of the program under Obamacare and by rising medical costs that also affect Medicare. "Medicaid is the fastest-growing component of transfer income," adds the report.
Separately, the Foundation for Government Accountability finds that "total spending on Medicaid expansion has surpassed $1 trillion nationwide—$574 billion more than expected."
Even so, the EIG report emphasizes that "Medicaid expansion had only three quarters the effect on transfer spending annually as a single percentage point increase in the share of the population aged 65 and over." Seniors are growing as a share of the U.S. population, cashing in on Social Security and Medicare, and that's the main driver of dependency on government payments.
Also included in the analysis are programs including veterans' benefits, the earned income tax credit, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Supplemental Security Income, unemployment insurance, and Pell grants.
Most dependent on transfer payments are retirement communities, Native American communities, poor areas, and rural counties lacking thriving farming, energy, or tourist industries. "62 percent of counties with above-national elderly shares of the population, 65 percent of counties outside metro areas, and 79 percent of counties with above-national poverty rates fell into the high-transfer tier in 2022."
The Scary Politics of Dependency
In their own analysis of the EIG data, The Wall Street Journal's Aaron Zitner, Jon Kamp, and Brian McGill emphasize that counties dependent on government payments have looked increasingly Republican over the last 20 years. "The map of government spending also helps explain the rise of Donald Trump," they write. "He not only has promised to revive America's economically stagnating communities, but to protect Social Security or Medicare from 'even a single penny' of cuts."
More to the point, Americans' growing reliance on payments from the government has pushed the transformation of American politics. Where once Democrats promised greater largesse and Republicans talked of a smaller, leaner state, now both major parties increasingly compete on visions of government that does things for people rather than getting out of the way of people doing for themselves. While they still constitute a minority, those dependent on the state are a growing proportion of the population and are receptive to politicians and programs that promise to keep the money flowing.
The EIG authors worry that growing reliance on transfer payments creates pressure for higher taxes that "could choke off the very economic activity that finances transfers." They're concerned the situation promotes stagnation as people come to value the security of regular checks over taking risks and building businesses that will create future prosperity.
At least as worrisome is that the cash flows create a client–patron relationship between Americans who receive government payments and the politicians who create and administer such programs. It's a relationship that empowers the political class by eroding the economic independence of the people over whom they wield authority. It's difficult to say "no" to those on whom you depend for handouts, and it's not obvious that many office-seekers, or voters, want to alter that dynamic.
No Easy Fixes
To remedy what they highlight as a dangerous situation, the EIG authors favor tax hikes, entitlement reform, and "policies that foster economic dynamism and participation in the workforce." But they admit an aging population poses severe challenges. And their recipe for higher taxes and growth-oriented industrial policy sounds like a call for more big, activist government that got us here and that inevitably cultivates dependency among the population to win support and exert control.
For Americans to reassert independence, they'll have to want to cut reliance on government. Some certainly do, but it's not clear that it involves enough people to change the country's course.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
They need to tweak Covid a little so it kills off more disabled and elderly. The current variants are too conservative in their effective killing, as seen in the overwhelming amount of boomers.
Also, how tf are we gonna lure in immigrants if we can’t dangle snap benefits, hotels, cash, phones, and housing in fromt of their impoverished asses?
Plus Medicaid. Immigrants are natural libertarians-Cato/Reason
Jd is so close to becoming a libritarian.
When it comes to the gov always assume malice. They are not good people, or people. They want stupid sick dependant loosers
Happy JD is focusing on the mountain and not a molehill like tariffs.
But isn’t he wrong about that?
JD
VanceTuccille is not wrong about government welfare costs.Wait wait- everyone calm the f3*k down. Immigrants are natural libertarians- Cato/Reason
I’ve paid $500,000 into Social Security between my contributions and the “employer contributions” and have been working in engineering since June 2, 1980. Adjusted for inflation this is over a million dollars. I think at this time I should start to collect my Social Security and other benefits.
Which entirely misses the point that by washing your money through the government, you are now at the mercy of government to give it back to you. That weakens your power to rein in the government that has so much discretion over your money.
^THIS^ +100000000. Social-ist Security Justice?
It has and will always be the very opposite of actual Justice.
The very point of Socialism is to destroy Liberty and Justice.
“The U.S. government is a Ponzi scheme”
Bernie Madoff
And he had a choice to do otherwise? Government collects payroll taxes at the point of a gun.
True. But it rather dismisses the collective [WE] gang responsibility in that – that chose to elect politicians that pridefully campaigned on UN-Constitutional (US destruction) policies. Specifically on-subject the election of FDR with a [D]-trifecta.
Democrats have always had every ability to launch a DNC Retirement company and offer Social-ist Security for every single one of their like-minded people. There was ZERO excuse to do Gov-Gun ‘armed-theft’ of unlike-minded people. Course that’s the whole point; Democrats aren’t out to ‘plan’ something wonderful. They’re out to STEAL from those 'icky' people. It's all part of their [WE] gang RULES 'democracy' their party idolizes above the Supreme Law (very definition) of a USA.
If they don't give it back to you, are you any less at their mercy?
Being forced to pay into it your entire life, while expecting something back is not irrational. At the very least, the 500k should be returned.
Everyone on planet earth walking across the social construct, throwing yourself as a ward of the state, or Americans breeding into it, then receiving transfers, are seemingly okay with CatoReason.
The left and it’s ?free? ponies has already STOLEN your “life savings” and there isn’t anything fair, just or rational about it. You feel ripped off because you’ve been ripped off.
It's for the 'poor' don't ya know? /s
You're right. It always pisses me off when these "think" tankers lump the Social Security and Medicare benefits we and our employers paid for with straight up welfare programs like SNAP and Medicaid.
"growing reliance on transfer payments creates pressure for higher taxes that could choke off the very economic activity that finances transfers.
They're concerned the situation promotes stagnation as people come to value the security of regular checks over taking risks and building businesses that will create future prosperity.
^THIS^ [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism] is a ZERO-SUM resources game.
Gov-Gun THEFT doesn't make sh*t.
This is a really good article.
Minus the obvious contradiction leftardedness someone painted onto it. "recipe for higher taxes and growth-oriented industrial policy sounds like a call for more big, activist government that got us here and that inevitably cultivates dependency among the population to win support and exert control."
And the worse part is the self-destruction is perpetual.
The more THEFT happens the poorer the nation gets (Armed theft doesn't make sh*t) and the more THEFT people think they need to do. Especially when their armed-theft is cuddled as being 'equality' instead of being recognized as criminal. Cuddling criminal behavior is exactly what the lefts ideology stands on.
You have to wonder: Is transfer payment explosion the thing that will ultimately doom the historic USA experiment?
.
The ultimate result of unchecked transfer payment growth is a final, socialist state with a stagnating, failed economy a la Venezuela.
"Many citizens of the land of the free are hooked on government checks."
Is Reason talking about Americans or Ukrainians?
And how much of that is the SS Disability fund? That's important, because that program has grown well beyond its original intent, and while social security is (theoretically) fully funded by contributions, ss disability isn't. Any disabled person can draw on it.
2022 December SS Disability paid out <13B. So ballpark 150B for a year. That's a tiny fraction of SS. (SS's annual benefit payments for 2023 was 1.237 Trillion)
More than 10% isn't that tiny of a fraction
Rohan is correct here. Disability is not the same thing as retirement and there is an entire industry of private disability insurers, lawyers and "medical professionals" fast tracking people into the system. In fact SS disability is the early retirement plan of a pretty big percentage of the working population (see Office Space). I've known several.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTo5-p1G-h0
Rohan is wrong. You need to have worked and paid SS tax to qualify for SS Disability. He may be thinking of SSI (Supplemental Security Income), which is a welfare program and requires no work history.
That is not correct, John Rohan. SS Disability is available only for those who worked and paid FICA taxes. You're probably thinking of SSI, Supplemental Security Income, which doesn't require any work history and is pure welfare.
This article is worrying that retirees are stagnating?
Huh.
Perhaps there is some sort of corruption of justice in believing that just because you reach a certain age means everyone else has to support you?
""Americans Grow Increasingly Dependent on Government Payments""
Feature or bug?
A Feature for Gov-Gun packing ROBBERS.
A Bug for Gov-Gun THEFT victims.
Once upon a time Gov-Guns were used to ensure Liberty and Justice for all.
In a land where TAKING with 'Guns' was illegal and EARNING was the only just path to payments.
Course that all changes when criminals get a-hold of the Gov-Guns.
Scared?
"We have nothing to fear but fear itself." said FDR. He was wrong. We had him to fear. Virtually every one of his programs to reverse the Great Depression failed.
“We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before, and it does not work.” -Henry Morgenthau, Secretary of the Treasury (1934-1945)
Meanwhile throughout the 1930's, the economic programs of Hitler and Mussolini succeeded. When Hitler became Chancellor of Germany, the rate of unemployment was 33%; two years later, essentially zero.
Today, these United States are drowning in debt fueling governmental dependency. Of the two, major, presidential candidates, which offers realistic, hard-biting solutions? Neither. Our recent history is one of debt, defeat, dependency, and depravity. The future looks no different. Scared? With good reason.
Is there a better way? Yes. What? Employ the Scientific Method as described in detail in the unique novel, Retribution Fever.
Austerity is not popular among the peasants.
Cutting budgets is not popular among the government contractors.
Politicians need the votes of both.
“When Hitler became Chancellor of Germany, the rate of unemployment was 33%; two years later, essentially zero.”
Because he hired everybody into the SA?
Well, except for the ones he defined as not being persons.
BioMisbehavior certainly has a unique view of history.
That’s what happens when wages stagnate, cost of living increases and the government still wants them to consume.
Anyone that receives more than 50% of their livelihood from government benefits should not be eligible to vote. It is, quite simply, a conflict of interest.
Precisely the reason it requires 3/4 States and 2/3 Congress to Amend the US Constitution. The USA is not a 'democracy' and we no longer live in a USA because it has been conquered by elected 'democratic' [Na]tional So[zi]alist[s] who wouldn't honor their oath of office and should've been impeached/removed years ago.
OK I recently retired after 45 years of paying into SS/Medicare. For most of those years I was self employed and paid the full 15.3% of net profits and my business also paid 7.65% on behalf of my employees. It was clear to me 40 years ago that the entire system was an unsustainable Ponzi scheme. With every passing year it required more people paying in to support those who were entitled to benefits. Sooner or later the thing was destined to bust. It's not rocket science. I hung out with some activist tax protesters way back in the 80s some of whom ended up pleading their cases in federal courts. Read the tracts. Subscribed to newsletters. In every case the courts ruled that taxation was a political matter and that the courts have no jurisdiction. Over the years there were multiple proposals to reform the system with an option of individual retirement accounts or a Fair Tax on consumption to fund the treasury. I would have jumped on any opportunity. But none became available. So now I get a monthly payment from the US Treasury that the author describes as sucking on the public teat. Well you can fuck right off. My purported greed and dependency have earned me a poverty wage that will only break even if I outlive the actuarial tables. And. All of this weeping and gnashing of teeth about entitlements ignores the much larger issue which threatens not only SS but all retirement savings and indeed the income of everyone. The inevitable collapse of the USD. Government operates by MMT. Nobody even pretends otherwise. This cannot end well and sometimes I hope I don't outlive the actuarial tables. The shit is going to get really ugly.
But if most of this is "paying ourselves", it's not clear to me that that's a problem. Seems the incentives were worse when you had to be poor to qualify.
That's a point against the Us vs. Them narrative.
But the real problems IMO are:
(a) we have to pay a lot of bureaucrats just to "pay ourselves" and
(b) every "pay ourselves" program has been (or will be) politicized -- and now people wonder how our politics became so fractious.
If it was just "paying ourselves" it wouldn't require Gov-Guns.
Read this in the WSJ recently. It's a load of bollocks because it includes SS/Medicare. That's lame because (a) participation in those programs IS REQUIRED BY LAW and (b) retirees lead the pack in household net worth. WTH?
All you can conclude from this report is that the Democrats' long-term plan to turn all citizens into clients of the State has worked like a charm since FDR's New Deal. Thanks, folks. :-/
So true and it will get only worse
The politicians have successfully hooked the elderly, and now they are working on those in their child-bearing years.
Romney proposed giving more money to parents with children three or four years ago. Several "conservatives" agreed with the plan.
Harris is now proposing to give more money to parents with children, and Walz signed a bill to provide free school lunches for every student in Minnesota.
Still, the fertility rate is declining, with many people blaming costs, even while government subsidies for parents with children continue to grow and employer benefits for parents with children continue to grow.
It isn’t just the citizens, it’s the towns, municipalities, counties and states increasingly becoming dependent on the federal government, or at least using it to suck as much money as possible out by spending more than we actually needed to in order to get more "free" dollars. My county seat just “beautified” itself with a million matching dollars used to install ornamental streetlights, rip up concrete sidewalks and replace them with bricks, install flowery medians, replace the courthouse roof and windows. We could have just replaced the roof and windows ourselves for far less than we spent to get matching dollars, the medians just made it so you have to go a quarter mile and make a u-turn to get into a business you just had to turn left to get to before the medians, the pretty lightposts are in the middle of the sidewalks so the people using the new wheelchair ramps everywhere to get on the sidewalk have to get on the grass to go around them. It was a total waste of money on a small rural town. We now have sidewalks in places where no one ever walks that lead to nowhere.
Didn't Romney make essentially this point when he was running years ago, and get clobbered for doing so?
Social security will be means tested. It is the obvious solution, and it is inevitable.
Social-ist Security has already been means tested. Over and over and over and over and over again throughout human history. This nation fought a war of Independence to escape the FAILURE that it is.
If you want Social-ist Security; MOVE to some other nation.
The increasing dependency on government payments raises important questions about our economic future. While these funds are essential for many families, I can’t help but feel concerned about the sustainability of such programs. It’s crucial to encourage self-reliance and job creation instead. I’ve noticed various payment solutions, like https://payneteasy.com/ are making it easier for businesses and individuals to manage their finances. Perhaps if more resources were directed toward financial education and innovative payment methods, we could empower people to become less reliant on government support. How can we find a balance that fosters independence while providing necessary assistance?